Pages: 1 [2] |
21. neutron blaster w/ damage mod or ion cannon? - in General Discussions [original thread]
For isk efficiency neutron blaster. Also it allows for upgrades to some of the other modules. I assume you mean one damage mod? I've tried two, but have found that I prefer the nitro + 'whatever' for maddys. It is possible with all basic modules ...
- by Aardicus - at 2014.01.27 01:14:00
|
22. [Video] - Casual Dusting - Assault Rail Rifle Spotlight - in General Discussions [original thread]
+1 Good stuff.
- by Aardicus - at 2014.01.08 21:49:00
|
23. The real problem with AI installations... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rynoceros wrote: Assist Points for the Merc that hacked it. Also, I wonder if you'd get WP for repping it while it got the kills...?
- by Aardicus - at 2013.12.26 22:18:00
|
24. CCP WOLFMAN - TANKS/AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Wolfman wrote: We're working away on the vehicles atm. We'll give you guys an overview of what we're doing shortly so you know what's going on. Awesome, I look forward to this.
- by Aardicus - at 2013.08.23 11:25:00
|
25. armor tanks benefit more from shield repers then shield tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Halador Osiris wrote: Shield tanks are going to get more mileage out of shield transporters than armor tanks will. Why? Resists. If a shield tank has 23.5% resistance (aka Shield Upgrades V and a Ward Shield Amplifier), for every 100 points of ...
- by Aardicus - at 2013.08.12 19:46:00
|
26. Upllink spam - in General Discussions [original thread]
It is currently inefficient to use flux over AV simply due to the nature of the current LAVs. [/quote] IN PC matches LLAV's are not as effective as pubs.[/quote] Oh well i play pubs. our corp doesnt have enough members (nor the equipment) to g...
- by Aardicus - at 2013.08.12 19:41:00
|
27. Upllink spam - in General Discussions [original thread]
I hate how weapons in this game spam 'bullets'. CCP should really look into fixing this.
- by Aardicus - at 2013.08.12 19:36:00
|
28. armor tanks benefit more from shield repers then shield tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
My best games as an armor tanker have come from being in a squad of full of logi's that, you know, logi. I can basically sit ON the objective (in Dom) and repel all enemy rushes. Most AVers assume I'm just another dumb armor tank waiting to die to...
- by Aardicus - at 2013.08.12 19:31:00
|
29. What do we do about HAVs and Dropships? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I have heard that the LLAV has an inate 30% resist? If so I think this should be given to Heavy Vehicles. 30% to HAV's, 20% to MAV's, and 10% to LAV's.(Apply appropriately to Dropships) Then 'correct' the bugged armor reppers, and I'll not compla...
- by Aardicus - at 2013.08.01 21:44:00
|
30. 500,000,000+ ISK to be offered SoonTM (maybe) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alldin Kan wrote: I only feel like playing this game just to hit the cap, there's real no enjoyment in this game and I think I might be done in a few months or less. I still find it ridiculous how there's still no player trading, great lack of ...
- by Aardicus - at 2013.07.30 10:57:00
|
31. Militia Swarm > Proto Swarm? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: I have been using the proto swarm since the respec, but I have recently gone back to the militia to save ISK. Anyways... I have noticed that the militia Swarm missiles seem to be better than the proto version in key areas....
- by Aardicus - at 2013.07.27 19:05:00
|
32. Tanks are useless... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knightshade Belladonna wrote: medomai grey wrote: Cosgar wrote: Funny story- I was in an ambush and someone came in with a gunlogi. After a FG hit and a few MD rounds from yours truly, it was reduced to a smoldering heap of metal and tear...
- by Aardicus - at 2013.07.27 19:00:00
|
33. I Used To Be A Tanker Like You Until I Took A Missle To The Knee - in General Discussions [original thread]
No lollygaggin'
- by Aardicus - at 2013.06.18 11:12:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |