Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cosgar
ParagonX
2236
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:25:00 -
[91] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
Even if our variants are bad - at least we'd have a choice... and a choice between shield tanking and armor tanking would be great... and honestly - fair.
Not really I hardly notice the difference when forge gunning an armor drop ship or a shield dropship. You're comparing infantry with vehicles and bringing Derpships into the argument? |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
5656
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:26:00 -
[92] - Quote
Ninjanomyx wrote: OMFG..........IWS just QUIT already. You are so f***ing irrelevant it actually makes me physically ill everytime you type/speak. You aren't a presence ingame, you have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to just about ANYTHING, and what little "Information" you provide is often misinformation & regurgitated misdirection. You are CCPs f***ing lap dog..... Whatever BS PR Spindig they fecal toss your way you immediately gobble it down & drool out the leftovers for the "Community".
From a Tactical Standpoint you often only see the Size/Shape of the Avatar before an Engagement. You then decide to Shoot or Run based upon the presented Scenario. The Color of the Suit & details of the "Skin" are often the last thing on your mind in a heated firefight, you simply Fight or Flight. And if you had enough time to stare at the Nipple Rings or Crotch Curvature of a Dropsuit for "Tactical Purposes" then you probably had enough time to ADS & read the Analysis/Scan of the ACTUAL DATA, which is far more informative as it contains all of the Data you need at a glance (& is extremely simple to add in).
Placeholders are hardly expensive.... You slap a Color (Or don't, who cares) on a Dural Suit & give it Stats & Slots, a Name, & an Skill Node to sink SP into & viola, new f***ing Dropsuits. Modeling is not needed so the Art Department can take their sweet ass time playing Dress-up or making New Models for New Content (MTAC, Jet, etc) & then play the Crayola Game w/ the Skins afterwards. I mean....are you seriously this dunce & blind of a Fanboy Pet that you defend this POS excuse??? I take it as yes....you are.
Placeholders allow for there to be room to breathe while the Community enjoys Critiquing & Metagaming the **** out of their new toys. Stat Balancing can be done @ a proper pace w/ more Community Involvement as we will have gained experience with the Synergies berween the Variants, thus allowing better informed Balancing Discussions at an accelerated pace. What we have now is a Logistical mess with no Balance while slow trickles of New Suits are thrown into the mix. Commando Suit, Pilot Suit, Weapons, hell even Modules & Equipment that are NEW are being introduced.....yet the Core Variants are left on the backburner.
This now excessively elongates the Balancing Duration & forces a significant chunk of the already burnt-out Community to remain Spec'd into something that is so far off of their chosen Career Path only to retain relevance on the Battlefield. Anyone who hoardes SP for 3 Years, remaining at the bottom of the "Food Chain" & being barred from Competitive Play, still clinging onto "Hope" as they live to be PUBstomped while eagerly awaiting their desired Fitting to be made.....is a Masochistic Blind Fanboy Freerunner. So not only do these ignoramus not contribute to the Developers/Producers/Directors/Etc. (& if they do...they are further gone mentally for Paying to Wait). they also attemp to derail Valuable Discussions by claiming those who don't follow their Mantra of what they call "Patience" to be deserving of wasting their SP.
So not only will introducing Placeholders, promptly followed by a Respec, be significantly more Cost Effective in the long run.....it also frees up Developmental Effort/Time that may further focus on Core & Balancing, allows a feeling of Near-Completion/Variety which boosts Community Morale & Player Retension, prevents a feeling of immediate need for Respec & Reinbursement in the future, & generally enables more valuable Well-Informed Discussions now rather than "SoonGäó". But what the hell do I know.....I haven't had my nasal cavity so far up the rectal orifice that I can smell last week's dinner :P
What part of 'CPM already tried and failed to get placeholders done months ago' did you not understand? |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
2564
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:27:00 -
[93] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
Even if our variants are bad - at least we'd have a choice... and a choice between shield tanking and armor tanking would be great... and honestly - fair.
Not really I hardly notice the difference when forge gunning an armor drop ship or a shield dropship.
wait...what????
Hardly a difference between shield tanking and armor tanking???? What game have you been playing?
If I had a choice now I'll go more shields than armor in a heart beat! The amount of weapons that lolWTF rapes armor compared to shields, not to mention the regen time of shields and the speed penalty of lolarmor.
Hardly a difference? smh |
Killar-12
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
14
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:27:00 -
[94] - Quote
Ninjanomyx wrote: OMFG..........IWS just QUIT already. You are so f***ing irrelevant it actually makes me physically ill everytime you type/speak. You aren't a presence ingame, you have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to just about ANYTHING, and what little "Information" you provide is often misinformation & regurgitated misdirection. You are CCPs f***ing lap dog..... Whatever BS PR Spindig they fecal toss your way you immediately gobble it down & drool out the leftovers for the "Community".
From a Tactical Standpoint you often only see the Size/Shape of the Avatar before an Engagement. You then decide to Shoot or Run based upon the presented Scenario. The Color of the Suit & details of the "Skin" are often the last thing on your mind in a heated firefight, you simply Fight or Flight. And if you had enough time to stare at the Nipple Rings or Crotch Curvature of a Dropsuit for "Tactical Purposes" then you probably had enough time to ADS & read the Analysis/Scan of the ACTUAL DATA, which is far more informative as it contains all of the Data you need at a glance (& is extremely simple to add in).
Placeholders are hardly expensive.... You slap a Color (Or don't, who cares) on a Dural Suit & give it Stats & Slots, a Name, & an Skill Node to sink SP into & viola, new f***ing Dropsuits. Modeling is not needed so the Art Department can take their sweet ass time playing Dress-up or making New Models for New Content (MTAC, Jet, etc) & then play the Crayola Game w/ the Skins afterwards. I mean....are you seriously this dunce & blind of a Fanboy Pet that you defend this POS excuse??? I take it as yes....you are.
Placeholders allow for there to be room to breathe while the Community enjoys Critiquing & Metagaming the **** out of their new toys. Stat Balancing can be done @ a proper pace w/ more Community Involvement as we will have gained experience with the Synergies berween the Variants, thus allowing better informed Balancing Discussions at an accelerated pace. What we have now is a Logistical mess with no Balance while slow trickles of New Suits are thrown into the mix. Commando Suit, Pilot Suit, Weapons, hell even Modules & Equipment that are NEW are being introduced.....yet the Core Variants are left on the backburner.
This now excessively elongates the Balancing Duration & forces a significant chunk of the already burnt-out Community to remain Spec'd into something that is so far off of their chosen Career Path only to retain relevance on the Battlefield. Anyone who hoardes SP for 3 Years, remaining at the bottom of the "Food Chain" & being barred from Competitive Play, still clinging onto "Hope" as they live to be PUBstomped while eagerly awaiting their desired Fitting to be made.....is a Masochistic Blind Fanboy Freerunner. So not only do these ignoramus not contribute to the Developers/Producers/Directors/Etc. (& if they do...they are further gone mentally for Paying to Wait). they also attemp to derail Valuable Discussions by claiming those who don't follow their Mantra of what they call "Patience" to be deserving of wasting their SP.
So not only will introducing Placeholders, promptly followed by a Respec, be significantly more Cost Effective in the long run.....it also frees up Developmental Effort/Time that may further focus on Core & Balancing, allows a feeling of Near-Completion/Variety which boosts Community Morale & Player Retension, prevents a feeling of immediate need for Respec & Reinbursement in the future, & generally enables more valuable Well-Informed Discussions now rather than "SoonGäó". But what the hell do I know.....I haven't had my nasal cavity so far up the rectal orifice that I can smell last week's dinner :P I'd usually condone personal attacks but this is justified and you have a good point. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
4462
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:28:00 -
[95] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
Even if our variants are bad - at least we'd have a choice... and a choice between shield tanking and armor tanking would be great... and honestly - fair.
Not really I hardly notice the difference when forge gunning an armor drop ship or a shield dropship. Are... you comparing killing a DS to giving heavies a shield variant? >_> To be fair, we don't have an armor OR shield variant, we have a hybrid that you can tip in one direction or the other (unless you went sentinel lmfao).
I shield tank my heavy and it's pretty nasty. |
Killar-12
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
14
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:30:00 -
[96] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
Even if our variants are bad - at least we'd have a choice... and a choice between shield tanking and armor tanking would be great... and honestly - fair.
Not really I hardly notice the difference when forge gunning an armor drop ship or a shield dropship. Are... you comparing killing a DS to giving heavies a shield variant? >_> To be fair, we don't have an armor OR shield variant, we have a hybrid that you can tip in one direction or the other (unless you went sentinel lmfao). I shield tank my heavy and it's pretty nasty. Quick Question about shield tanking a heavy do you use a extender and energizer or just two extenders? |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
5658
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:34:00 -
[97] - Quote
Yeah I wished they would swap sentinel and commando suit bonuses they seem to fit each other a hell lot better. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
2566
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:43:00 -
[98] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Yeah I wished they would swap sentinel and commando suit bonuses they seem to fit each other a hell lot better.
I don't know, a reload bonus and feedback dmg reduction for a heavy HMG / FG seems to be just right |
Killar-12
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
14
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:45:00 -
[99] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Yeah I wished they would swap sentinel and commando suit bonuses they seem to fit each other a hell lot better. IWS you're at least smarter than hooc so... I won't rag you... without justification... |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
4463
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:54:00 -
[100] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Quick Question about shield tanking a heavy do you use a extender and energizer or just two extenders? Quick Answer: do you feel that a Heavies shields should be extended?
It's all about active recharge my friend. Being able to pop in and out of cover on your shields. Sometimes, sacrifices must be made.
In 4098 when the Gallente Heavy is officially released, I have every intention on hybrid tanking, no matter the outcry that it causes deep within any EVE players soul. <3 mah hybrid tank, ain't not nobody take ma hybrid tank. Damage mods are useful when you can't or don't want to use prototype gear, but I find the survivability to fit my playstyle more. Damage mods also help if your aim is horrible like mine (partly my controller or dust or boths fault. The camera will randomly move sometimes as if I'm pressing the right joystick in any given direction. It's extremely frustrating and I'll be doing my best to track down some kind of replacement when possible, but I need to have the Xbox style controller where the left joystick is higher up than the right, so it's wiggly aiming for now) ((whoaaa sidetracked))
Anyyyywaaay.
Lol flux. ***** can't touch this NA NANANA
|
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
4463
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:57:00 -
[101] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Yeah I wished they would swap sentinel and commando suit bonuses they seem to fit each other a hell lot better. I propose we give commando's to the medium frames, and just bump them ol' logis up to heavies. It fits the single heavy philosophy, because we only have to have one variant: the caldari. BOOM. Now logi's are fixed, commandos are where they belong, and all is well in no one gives a ****'s ville.
Sarcasm aside, I wish they would scrap basically all the bonuses they have and completely rethink them, nothing feels valuable or unique enough to actually care in most cases. |
Killar-12
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
15
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:00:00 -
[102] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Yeah I wished they would swap sentinel and commando suit bonuses they seem to fit each other a hell lot better. I propose we give commando's to the medium frames, and just bump them ol' logis up to heavies. It fits the single heavy philosophy, because we only have to have one variant: the caldari. BOOM. Now logi's are fixed, commandos are where they belong, and all is well in no one gives a ****'s ville. Sarcasm aside, I wish they would scrap basically all the bonuses they have and completely rethink them, nothing feels valuable or unique enough to actually care in most cases. I see the Commandos as specialty soldiers able to adapt to the situations in the battlefield |
Darken-Sol
BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate
403
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:01:00 -
[103] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:From IronWolfSaber on IRC: Quote:cost effort would be too high to use place holders
GG Heavies - we cost too much for them to care about. minnesota? |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
4463
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:03:00 -
[104] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:I see the Commandos as specialty soldiers able to adapt to the situations in the battlefield I see Commandos as something that look better on paper than they do in practice, and currently serve no more useful role than mobile AV specialists. (actually, they honestly can't even do that, because who AVs without AV grenades? O.o) The Commando is an SP sink hole through and through :/ )
You're welcome to test it out on the battlefield, my basic Heavy frame vs your Commando. I'll bring my AR, you bring...whatever. Bring friends. I probably won't, but the more the merrier
|
Cosgar
ParagonX
2239
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:07:00 -
[105] - Quote
Darken-Sol wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:From IronWolfSaber on IRC: Quote:cost effort would be too high to use place holders
GG Heavies - we cost too much for them to care about. minnesota? Detroit |
Killar-12
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
15
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:14:00 -
[106] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Killar-12 wrote:I see the Commandos as specialty soldiers able to adapt to the situations in the battlefield I see Commandos as something that look better on paper than they do in practice, and currently serve no more useful role than mobile AV specialists. (actually, they honestly can't even do that, because who AVs without AV grenades? O.o) The Commando is an SP sink hole through and through :/ ) They'd make halfway descent redline snipers at least. You're welcome to test it out on the battlefield, my basic Heavy frame vs your Commando. I'll bring my AR, you bring...whatever. Bring friends. I probably won't, but the more the merrier Hmmm... give me a little bit of time... |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
4465
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:19:00 -
[107] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Hmmm... give me a little bit of time... Too bad CCP doesn't know how to put in custom games in their "AAA" Shooter
|
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. League of Infamy
3213
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:19:00 -
[108] - Quote
So let me get this straight:
CPM Tried to get place-holders - got told to eff off - so stopped bringing it up? Regardless of CCP's position it should be hammered the importance of those place holders. You fail as our reps when you give into CCP's fail-logic of "Too much work and money."
I have an idea - take away all the suits variants and put them in the same boat as heavy and watch them be humbled by "Sorry too cost effective" and "Sorry - we don't think it would balance current game."
I'm sure people will just throw money left and right at CCP over it. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
714
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:28:00 -
[109] - Quote
it cost ccp 1 million dollars per placeholder which they have to pay sony because Sony owns the system, btw the pilot placeholders are costing ccp alot because they are still there. so they are begging sony to remove them so they don't have to pay for them. well this is what goes off in my mind anyways and probably PS2 has everything i as a vehicle user wanted and still have balance. Sony will smite everyone! run for the hills. to bad PS2 is only on PC because mines not that great but hey it only cost 400$. |
Killar-12
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
15
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:29:00 -
[110] - Quote
ladwar wrote:it cost ccp 1 million dollars per placeholder which they have to pay sony because Sony owns the system, btw the pilot placeholders are costing ccp alot because they are still there. so they are begging sony to remove them so they don't have to pay for them . well this is what goes off in my mind anyways and probably has some truth because PS2 has everything i as a vehicle user wanted and still have balance. Sony will smite everyone! run for the hills. to bad PS2 is only on PC because mines not that great but hey it only cost 400$. Are you High, Tired, or Drunk? |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
5661
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:35:00 -
[111] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:So let me get this straight:
CPM Tried to get place-holders - got told to eff off - so stopped bringing it up? Regardless of CCP's position it should be hammered the importance of those place holders. You fail as our reps when you give into CCP's fail-logic of "Too much work and money."
I have an idea - take away all the suits variants and put them in the same boat as heavy and watch them be humbled by "Sorry too cost effective" and "Sorry - we don't think it would balance current game."
I'm sure people will just throw money left and right at CCP over it.
Well CPM knows when and when not to push after all we're not designers, business manager nor their bosses.
While the CPM does have a great deal of influence on some thing for example, CPM Kain and CPM Nova Knife did a lot of pushing on one subject and actually got a change through next week.
There are topic and issues which CCP does have the right to put their foot down and basically tell us rather not. For example I suggested a vehicle control scheme which was shot down near instantly with a fairly good reason and well I am not going to push that subject again because it would be a waste of time and its rather marginal.
Like I said if I had to pick between fighting for place holes and fighting for new suits I rather fight for getting new heavy suits out. Because CCP cannot stomp on that at all because its on their to do list. Where as placeholders have been stomped down on and I am not willing to refight that. Now if CCP said like we're getting racial MMCs out before racial heavies I would certainly throw a tantrum then as MCCs are not gameplay objects yet.
I mean I am not sure where the three eye'd Gallente Heavy rumor came from as I haven't seen it on any of the Dev postings but if its true then more power to you. Just because the 6 month road map you guys saw is devoid of any 'content' you have to remember that these goals are very free form and can and will include content so on the balance bullet point new suits may be required to achieve that. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
4467
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 23:06:00 -
[112] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Like I said if I had to pick between fighting for placeholders or fighting for new suits I rather fight for getting new heavy suits out. Because CCP cannot stomp on that at all because it is on their to do list. Where as placeholders have been stomped down on and I am not willing to refight that. Now if CCP said like we're getting racial MMCs out before racial heavies I would certainly throw a tantrum then as MCCs are not gameplay objects yet.
I'd just like to be clear that I don't want placeholders.
I want the suits.
And if CCP aims to make me wait another half a year to get them, then they best DAMN make sure they refund the racial SP for Heavy and Scout suits when their racial variants are released. |
Killar-12
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
15
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 23:08:00 -
[113] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Like I said if I had to pick between fighting for placeholders or fighting for new suits I rather fight for getting new heavy suits out. Because CCP cannot stomp on that at all because it is on their to do list. Where as placeholders have been stomped down on and I am not willing to refight that. Now if CCP said like we're getting racial MMCs out before racial heavies I would certainly throw a tantrum then as MCCs are not gameplay objects yet.
I'd just like to be clear that I don't want placeholders. I want the suits. And if CCP aims to make me wait another half a year to get them, then they best DAMN make sure they refund the racial SP for Heavy and Scout suits when their racial variants are released. Agreed |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
5668
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 23:13:00 -
[114] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Like I said if I had to pick between fighting for placeholders or fighting for new suits I rather fight for getting new heavy suits out. Because CCP cannot stomp on that at all because it is on their to do list. Where as placeholders have been stomped down on and I am not willing to refight that. Now if CCP said like we're getting racial MMCs out before racial heavies I would certainly throw a tantrum then as MCCs are not gameplay objects yet.
I'd just like to be clear that I don't want placeholders. I want the suits. And if CCP aims to make me wait another half a year to get them, then they best DAMN make sure they refund the racial SP for Heavy and Scout suits when their racial variants are released.
Well I have no idea when the new suits are coming out but love for the Heavies is wanted. I hope it won't come down to waiting six months but whatever happens is going to happen. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
2143
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 23:16:00 -
[115] - Quote
Changing their colors is expensive? Bro, I could do it on Paint. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
5669
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 23:20:00 -
[116] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Changing their colors is expensive? Bro, I could do it on Paint.
Item creation and then removal is probably more expensive. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
2143
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 23:21:00 -
[117] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Changing their colors is expensive? Bro, I could do it on Paint. Item creation and then removal is probably more expensive. You lost me there |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
530
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 23:27:00 -
[118] - Quote
Is it even confirmed that the only thing that holds heavies back is the art department?
To put placeholders into the game we first need them to be essentially finished in design apart from art and i haven't seen anything that suggests that. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
2578
|
Posted - 2013.07.07 00:20:00 -
[119] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Is it even confirmed that the only thing that holds heavies back is the art department?
To put placeholders into the game we first need them to be essentially finished in design apart from art and i haven't seen anything that suggests that.
to be honest it doesn't matter what's holding back the other heavy suits. Bottom line is they're not coming anytime soon. |
Avinash Decker
BetaMax. CRONOS.
52
|
Posted - 2013.07.07 00:24:00 -
[120] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Changing their colors is expensive? Bro, I could do it on Paint. Item creation and then removal is probably more expensive.
If its true , just explain the process to the players they won't understand why until you do or until ccp does |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |