For me it's frame rate. Drops in FPS are not acceptable to me in competative games.

Remember, only 1 choice,

For me it's frame rate. Drops in FPS are not acceptable to me in competative games.

Remember, only 1 choice,

Aimming

All of it.

Fixing current issues retains older players.

Adding the rest of the game gets new players.

Both are critical.

Removing the Pub Stomp that is chasing new players away from the game.

I guess their current solution is matchmaking so they should work on that.

Of course their last two solutions have failed...they would be better served simply removing the SP/leveling system form the game entirely.

Ahh tony, with so many issues still not sorted from beta how can you choose only 1

Finding a middle ground.

On one extreme polar side exist Eve players or otherwise PC gamers, who are use to a slow development process and are willing to wait 5 to 7 years or more for signs of major improvement. Many put forth the tenet if you're not willing to devote years to Dust then it's not the for you. Many also seem to have almost fanatical attractment to a philosophical idea of what New Eden is and how those principles must be a core component to designing Dust, because they believe without question, what works in Eve must also work in Dust.

The other far end of the specturm are FPS hardcores, who because of the marketing structure of modern games favor the fast paced, instant gratification of a drop in, drop out experience. Needless to say patience is not one of their virtues, and they often come of as whiny and demanding. They feel most PC gamers, particularly MMO players lack FPS or general shooting experience, which lends to them being horrible Dust, and invalids most of their opinions on it.

Then there's everyone in the middle and truth that Dust is game with PC style, slow and steady development, but with FPS elements trying to hash out a niche on console. An entertainment medium whose principle market favors quicker installments and updates, trading the longivity of individual titles for the longivity of a series. The game needs to attract new players, while retaining existing ones. If Dust is to survive CCP needs to find a middle ground that reins in both extremes and doesn't alienate the middle majority.

Yay for Fenrir still being here :D join Seraphim Auxilleries. You've been NPC for too many builds.

Oh, and pick one thing :P

Putting the missing vowels in their name.

All of it.

Fixing current issues retains older players.

Adding the rest of the game gets new players.

Both are critical.

Two straw men pitted against one another in a false dichotomy. Great work.

Dose the entire game count?

Nanite injectors.

WORK ON GAME WITH PLAYERS

Not agains them.

maps being biased, i hate being a blaster tank sometimes because i cant shoot anything but anything can railgun/spam av nades at me, i know they cant change existing maps i just hope the new maps will be better other than that i think is actually pretty balanced to a degree

For me it's frame rate. Drops in FPS are not acceptable to me in competative games.

Remember, only 1 choice,

Gear-tiered matchmaking. I want to play matches with players only using militia and standard gear. This would singlehandedly save the game for me.

Its not just one... more like three (at the very least)

Aiming, walling grabbing on to you, Pub stomping

Those are all game breakers

The small player count in battles.

16 vs 16 in a game designed like Dust 514 is just laughable. 32 vs 32 should be an absolute barebones minimum. Unfortunately, there are a handful of smaller problems that make increasing player count a pipedream.

Nanite injectors.

For me it's frame rate. Drops in FPS are not acceptable to me in competative games.

Remember, only 4 choice's,

For me it's frame rate. Drops in FPS are not acceptable to me in competative games.

Remember, only 1 choice,