Alright, let's assume we'll get MTACs this year. I think it's safe to say they'll require vehicle skills, use small turrets, move slower than tanks, and have less HP than tanks.

How is a vehicle that moves slower than a tank and that has less DPS going to survive against current AV and even tanks?

Or maybe you should assume less and just wait.

look at what supports this, the new enforcers cost 2x as much as real tanks yet are far weaker, mainly because the assaulters crying "nerf everything"

For one, it might be small enough to fit inside of structures.

But yea, those are some pretty pessimistic and unfounded assumptions.

MTACs don't even exist yet, not even concept art and you're complaining?

1. they are vehicles of COURSE they'll need vehicle skills
2. who's to say they don't get a single large turret or a small turret on both arms (two small turrets can be quite effective)
3. Where'd you get this information from? How do you know they'll move slower?
4. okay yeah probably

and to Void Echo,
Do you even know what the enforcers are meant for? rail tanking, they're weaker so they can be destroyed while they RAIL TANK in the red line they aren't meant for the front lines and they aren't a nerf they are a variant of HAVs.

Alright, let's assume we'll get MTACs this year. I think it's safe to say they'll require vehicle skills, use small turrets, move slower than tanks, and have less HP than tanks.

How is a vehicle that moves slower than a tank and that has less DPS going to survive against current AV and even tanks?

who uses av on a map that a tank has no room to fit

and honestly if some one shoots a swarm at you move behind cover

if you see a forge gunner gtfo

and kill any one before they can get close enough to av you
simple

For one, it might be small enough to fit inside of structures.

But yea, those are some pretty pessimistic and unfounded assumptions.

OK, then let's assume they're good. What happens to vehicles that are combat effective- nerf once they get over 10:0 in a pub match and ppl start to QQ. It you think they'll be any good, your blind.

Agreed.

Personally, I envision them as the Tech-III ships of Dust. A medium weight-class vehicle with multiple subsystems that you assemble together into the specialization you want.

I also suggested a while back that they use infantry Heavy weapons to balance out what I imagine would be greater mobility and smaller size, thus making them a smaller and harder to hit target.

And for you to assume that they're going to be terrible is just ignorant. Larger vehicles will continue to dominate the large open fields, while MTACS could be a miniaturized version designed for CQC.

Besides, we have 0 information on what these will actually be. Will they be GIGANTIC JAPANESE FIGHTING ROBOTS, PS2's MAX suits, or very erotic and revealing leather suits with whips (female operators only), we won't know until later.

OK, so something with the HP of a Saga and the speed of a scout with kinetic katalyzers. It is not surviveable. Any vehicle user will tell you that if they know anything at all.

And for you to assume that they're going to be terrible is just ignorant. Larger vehicles will continue to dominate the large open fields, while MTACS could be a miniaturized version designed for CQC.

Besides, we have 0 information on what these will actually be. Will they be GIGANTIC JAPANESE FIGHTING ROBOTS, PS2's MAX suits, or very erotic and revealing leather suits with whips (female operators only)? We won't know until later.

OK, so something with the HP of a Saga and the speed of a scout with kinetic katalyzers. It is not surviveable. Any vehicle user will tell you that if they know anything at all.

MTACs don't even exist yet, not even concept art and you're complaining?

1. they are vehicles of COURSE they'll need vehicle skills
2. who's to say they don't get a single large turret or a small turret on both arms (two small turrets can be quite effective)
3. Where'd you get this information from? How do you know they'll move slower?
4. okay yeah they'll probably have less armor/shields

and to Void Echo,
Do you even know what the enforcers are meant for? rail tanking, they're weaker so they can be destroyed while they RAIL TANK in the red line they aren't meant for the front lines and they aren't a nerf they are a variant of HAVs.

Option 3 please.

Am I the only one that wants thrusters and a big ass plasma blade with my MTAC?

No or not :)
I really hope they don't nerf these BC they have so much potential. Imagine a team of two jumping ontop of a tank and ripping it apart with melee or gunning down infantry at close range with 30mm cannons for the minmitar versions. If they became the swiss army knives of dust I'd be pretty happy. Problem would be AV grenades that are carried by everyone so jump packs are a must.

MTACs don't even exist yet, not even concept art and you're complaining?

1. they are vehicles of COURSE they'll need vehicle skills
2. who's to say they don't get a single large turret or a small turret on both arms (two small turrets can be quite effective)
3. Where'd you get this information from? How do you know they'll move slower?
4. okay yeah they'll probably have less armor/shields

and to Void Echo,
Do you even know what the enforcers are meant for? rail tanking, they're weaker so they can be destroyed while they RAIL TANK in the red line they aren't meant for the front lines and they aren't a nerf they are a variant of HAVs.