Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mike Poole
Kirkinen Risk Control Caldari State
203
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 04:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why the hell is recalling a vehicle so easy?
A quick bit of hacking to take a killing machine and whisk it away the instant it comes under fire just to call it back out again nice and fixed up?
Where the hell is my option to instantly dematerialize my favorite expensive fit the instant I see someone coming to kill me?
I've never seen someone actually recall a vehicle until just now. I always assumed it would be a process that takes even a little time and needs a carrier to swoop in to pick it up at least leaving the vehicle vulnerable while it gets whisked away to perfect safety without any cost to the users wallet.
But a quick hack and instantly whisked away to never never land saving the user their full investment and robbing everyone trying to take it down? I don't think you can get much cheaper than that. |
Harpyja
DUST University Ivy League
97
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 04:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Your proto suit gets instantaneously saved at a supply depot, does it not? At least we have to jump out of our vehicles and be vulnerable for five whole seconds. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax. CRONOS.
1870
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 04:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
It puts up a message about RDV collection, but I think there really needs to actually be an RDV involved so that there is some risk involved in the recall. |
Wolfgang Erikson
Opus Arcana Orion Empire
11
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 04:55:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:It puts up a message about RDV collection, but I think there really needs to actually be an RDV involved so that there is some risk involved in the recall.
Agreed , just disappearing seems weird. RDV souls come back and pick it up. |
hgghyujh
Expert Intervention Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 04:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
Yep said this day one bleh what ever. |
undeadsoldier90
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
548
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 05:12:00 -
[6] - Quote
Wah? I called a wambulance for you. Should be arriving shortly. |
Doc Noah
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
119
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 05:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
Vehicles that sustained heavy damage (not just the ones on fire), shouldnt be able to be returned unless repaired. Speed of returning a vehicle should be reduced. Stolen vehicles shouldnt be returned to the owner at the end of a match.
Just some issues I hope CCP looks into somewhere down their roadmap. |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
274
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 05:56:00 -
[8] - Quote
Doc Noah wrote:Vehicles that sustained heavy damage (not just the ones on fire), shouldnt be able to be returned unless repaired. Speed of returning a vehicle should be reduced. Stolen vehicles shouldnt be returned to the owner at the end of a match.
Just some issues I hope CCP looks into somewhere down their roadmap. Just ride it into the redline before the match ends like I do. They don't get their vehicle back then |
Esper Shadows
Savage Arms INC
24
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 06:00:00 -
[9] - Quote
Doc Noah wrote:Vehicles that sustained heavy damage (not just the ones on fire), shouldnt be able to be returned unless repaired.
Repaired armor yes, agreed.
Doc Noah wrote: Speed of returning a vehicle should be reduced.
Would be better if the AI dropship had to be called in to pick up your vehicle just like it was brought in. That's reasonable.
Doc Noah wrote: Stolen vehicles shouldnt be returned to the owner at the end of a match.
That's a bridge too far bro. High-end vehicles cost a million+ ISK. They should be returned to the player that made that investment if it wasn't destroyed in the match. Whoever stole it most likely wouldn't be able to deploy it again anyway and there's no market to sell these items. Until we get the latter, vehicle owners should get their vehicle back. |
Karazantor
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 06:12:00 -
[10] - Quote
Esper Shadows wrote:[quote=Doc Noah] That's a bridge too far bro. High-end vehicles cost a million+ ISK. They should be returned to the player that made that investment if it wasn't destroyed in the match. Whoever stole it most likely wouldn't be able to deploy it again anyway and there's no market to sell these items. Until we get the latter, vehicle owners should get their vehicle back.
Hardly, if the owner can't keep it they don't deserve it. As for price, what the hell does that have to do with whether they should keep it?
Its not like the police are going to come and confiscate it and give it back to the original (incompetent) owner Actions have consequences. |
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon Plus
875
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 06:33:00 -
[11] - Quote
Esper Shadows wrote:Doc Noah wrote: Stolen vehicles shouldnt be returned to the owner at the end of a match.
That's a bridge too far bro. High-end vehicles cost a million+ ISK. They should be returned to the player that made that investment if it wasn't destroyed in the match. Whoever stole it most likely wouldn't be able to deploy it again anyway and there's no market to sell these items. Until we get the latter, vehicle owners should get their vehicle back. So you think people should get their tanks back if they were so horribly incompetent that they managed to die outside and allow their tank to be hacked?
|
Esper Shadows
Savage Arms INC
24
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 06:38:00 -
[12] - Quote
Well look at it this way, your proto dropsuit can cost a million+ ISK, but nobody can hack it and steal it. But million+ ISK vehicles CAN. Now, its fun to hack stuff, so hacking vehicles is in the game. But its fair to at least return it to the owner if it doesn't get blown up during the match.
Infantry-only players don't have to worry about their suits getting hacked. But vehicle-specced players have to worry about it every match. Try to put yourself in the other guy's shoes.
|
Doc Noah
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
119
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 06:42:00 -
[13] - Quote
Esper Shadows wrote:Well look at it this way, your proto dropsuit can cost a million+ ISK, but nobody can hack it and steal it. But million+ ISK vehicles CAN. Now, its fun to hack stuff, so hacking vehicles is in the game. But its fair to at least return it to the owner if it doesn't get blown up during the match.
Infantry-only players don't have to worry about their suits getting hacked. But vehicle-specced players have to worry about it every match. Try to put yourself in the other guy's shoes.
If they hack it back, sure, but if its in the hands of the enemy, then no.
You lost the vehicle, its your own fault and should have to deal with the consequence. Just be glad that the tank doesnt end up in the salvage of the stealer. |
Karazantor
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 06:45:00 -
[14] - Quote
Esper Shadows wrote:Well look at it this way, your proto dropsuit can cost a million+ ISK, but nobody can hack it and steal it. But million+ ISK vehicles CAN. Now, its fun to hack stuff, so hacking vehicles is in the game. But its fair to at least return it to the owner if it doesn't get blown up during the match.
Infantry-only players don't have to worry about their suits getting hacked. But vehicle-specced players have to worry about it every match. Try to put yourself in the other guy's shoes.
Thats not a very logical argument. It seems to center around it not being fair.
well, if you leave your car unlocked in rl it could well get stolen. On the other hand, unless you are mugged the chances of losing your shirt is a lot less.
Its sort of called, 'reality'.
And we can argue all you like over the definition of 'reality' in a sci-fi, however physics and human nature don't suddenly change. Also, if you lose ****, its stays lost., and doesn't magically materialize next to you the next day. |
Wolfgang Erikson
Opus Arcana Orion Empire
11
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 06:48:00 -
[15] - Quote
Esper Shadows wrote:Well look at it this way, your proto dropsuit can cost a million+ ISK, but nobody can hack it and steal it. But million+ ISK vehicles CAN. Now, its fun to hack stuff, so hacking vehicles is in the game. But its fair to at least return it to the owner if it doesn't get blown up during the match.
Infantry-only players don't have to worry about their suits getting hacked. But vehicle-specced players have to worry about it every match. Try to put yourself in the other guy's shoes.
First of all, nobody will ever lose as many tanks as drop suits. Except militia maybe, or idiots. Second, you can't leave your dropsuit on the battlefield to be hacked. Apples and oranges.
If you let your tank get hacked, consider it gone. It might as well been destroyed. What? Is an enemy corporation going to call you and leave a message: "Hey bro, you left your tank on the battlefield, thought you might want it back. "
In a game centered around making and losing ISK, that makes no sense. No matter whose shoes you are in. This game is about risks and rewards. |
Galvan Nized
Deep Space Republic
24
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 06:50:00 -
[16] - Quote
Esper Shadows wrote:Well look at it this way, your proto dropsuit can cost a million+ ISK, but nobody can hack it and steal it. But million+ ISK vehicles CAN. Now, its fun to hack stuff, so hacking vehicles is in the game. But its fair to at least return it to the owner if it doesn't get blown up during the match.
Infantry-only players don't have to worry about their suits getting hacked. But vehicle-specced players have to worry about it every match. Try to put yourself in the other guy's shoes.
Oh vehicle-specced players have like 2% chance of getting their vehicle hacked if they are anything near competent. Plus, as it is now, everyone just destroys the vehicle that they hack before the match is up so the vehicle-specced player is losing nothing more. I think you should be able to keep it as a prize if you hack it, but there is no recall (at least not like we have it).
|
ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
239
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 06:54:00 -
[17] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:Your proto suit gets instantaneously saved at a supply depot, does it not? At least we have to jump out of our vehicles and be vulnerable for five whole seconds.
Because your always guaranteed to be right next to a Supply Depot when you need it, right? |
Esper Shadows
Savage Arms INC
24
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 07:04:00 -
[18] - Quote
Esper Shadows wrote:
Thats not a very logical argument. It seems to center around it not being fair.
well, if you leave your car unlocked in rl it could well get stolen. On the other hand, unless you are mugged the chances of losing your shirt is a lot less.
Its sort of called, 'reality'.
And we can argue all you like over the definition of 'reality' in a sci-fi, however physics and human nature don't suddenly change. Also, if you lose ****, its stays lost., and doesn't magically materialize next to you the next day.
This is a video game dude. Its not real. CCP makes the rules. So I'll happily ignore this argument. I'll just say that where the ISK is getting invested matters. People who run infantry are putting millions into their dropsuits and they get mad whenever they get killed, especially if the enemy is using cheap tactics. But they don't have to worry about their suit getting stolen (by blueberries or reds).
Players who run vehicles get upset not only when their ride gets blown up, but especially when some blueberry jacks their ride or a red hacks it. Naturally, we put lots of ISK into our vehicles just like proto infantry does. So we appreciate having some code in the game that returns our expensive vehicles if we lose them during the game but they survive the match. Its a way of balancing the inherent in-game risks involved with fielding a vehicle (dumb blueberries and hacks) that proto suits don't have to deal with.
Put yourself in the other guy's shoes.
|
Charlotte O'Dell
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
428
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 07:06:00 -
[19] - Quote
Doc Noah wrote:Vehicles that sustained heavy damage (not just the ones on fire), shouldnt be able to be returned unless repaired. Speed of returning a vehicle should be reduced. Stolen vehicles shouldnt be returned to the owner at the end of a match.
Just some issues I hope CCP looks into somewhere down their roadmap.
You can't recall vehicles on fire. I do think it's a bit fast to recall. Sure, I don't see why not. |
Karazantor
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
20
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 07:10:00 -
[20] - Quote
Esper Shadows wrote:[quote=Esper Shadows]
This is a video game dude. Its not real. CCP makes the rules. So I'll happily ignore this argument. I'll just say that where the ISK is getting invested matters. People who run infantry are putting millions into their dropsuits and they get mad whenever they get killed, especially if the enemy is using cheap tactics. But they don't have to worry about their suit getting stolen (by blueberries or reds).
Players who run vehicles get upset not only when their ride gets blown up, but especially when some blueberry jacks their ride or a red hacks it. Naturally, we put lots of ISK into our vehicles just like proto infantry does. So we appreciate having some code in the game that returns our expensive vehicles if we lose them during the game but they survive the match. Its a way of balancing the inherent in-game risks involved with fielding a vehicle (dumb blueberries and hacks) that proto suits don't have to deal with.
Put yourself in the other guy's shoes.
I've been in 'the other guy's shoes'. I have had a tank stolen.
No, I didn't like it.
Yes, it was my fault
Yes, it was expensive.
Yes, It should happen.
If you think reality doesn't matter, you may not be aware that one of the selling points of CCP games is supposed to be 'realism' and consequences. It doesn't matter how much you hate this, it won't change.
A large portion of the fanbase of both takes great pleasure in 'harvesting tears' which includes destroying and stealing others things. The devs are known to be amongst this fanbase.
Despite not particularly caring for 'harvesting tears' I do strongly believe that realism matters, or I would be playing WoW or PS2 as of yesterday.
So good luck with this particular crusade, but it won't change, and I for one am extremely grateful for that fact. Nothing else for me to say on the subject. |
|
Knight SoIaire
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
757
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 07:28:00 -
[21] - Quote
It isn't instantly taken away.
I've destroyed HAVs that I couldn't even see. |
Esper Shadows
Savage Arms INC
25
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 07:33:00 -
[22] - Quote
Quote:
First of all, nobody will ever lose as many tanks as drop suits. Except militia maybe, or idiots. Second, you can't leave your dropsuit on the battlefield to be hacked. Apples and oranges.
If you let your tank get hacked, consider it gone. It might as well been destroyed. What? Is an enemy corporation going to call you and leave a message: "Hey bro, you left your tank on the battlefield, thought you might want it back. "
In a game centered around making and losing ISK, that makes no sense. No matter whose shoes you are in. This game is about risks and rewards.
Also, this previous post.
I don't really care if the "return your vehicle if it survives" code is realistic or not. I simply appreciate that its there because I put millions of ISK into my vehicles, and it balances off the risk of it getting stolen or hacked in-game. |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
176
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 07:34:00 -
[23] - Quote
Mike Poole wrote:Why the hell is recalling a vehicle so easy?
A quick bit of hacking to take a killing machine and whisk it away the instant it comes under fire just to call it back out again nice and fixed up?
Where the hell is my option to instantly dematerialize my favorite expensive fit the instant I see someone coming to kill me?
I've never seen someone actually recall a vehicle until just now. I always assumed it would be a process that takes even a little time and needs a carrier to swoop in to pick it up at least leaving the vehicle vulnerable while it gets whisked away to perfect safety without any cost to the users wallet.
But a quick hack and instantly whisked away to never never land saving the user their full investment and robbing everyone trying to take it down? I don't think you can get much cheaper than that. Why are you complaining? |
Esper Shadows
Savage Arms INC
25
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 07:37:00 -
[24] - Quote
Karazantor wrote:
So good luck with this particular crusade, but it won't change, and I for one am extremely grateful for that fact. Nothing else for me to say on the subject.
Good luck? Dude, the code is written in a way that I like. I want to keep it the way it is. If you like harvesting tears, go kill some proto suits. Leave my ride alone.
|
Void Echo
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
170
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 08:58:00 -
[25] - Quote
Doc Noah wrote:Esper Shadows wrote:Well look at it this way, your proto dropsuit can cost a million+ ISK, but nobody can hack it and steal it. But million+ ISK vehicles CAN. Now, its fun to hack stuff, so hacking vehicles is in the game. But its fair to at least return it to the owner if it doesn't get blown up during the match.
Infantry-only players don't have to worry about their suits getting hacked. But vehicle-specced players have to worry about it every match. Try to put yourself in the other guy's shoes.
If they hack it back, sure, but if its in the hands of the enemy, then no. You lost the vehicle, its your own fault and should have to deal with the consequence. Just be glad that the tank doesnt end up in the salvage of the stealer. If they manage to steal my vehicle despite every precaution I take, then they earned it. Not a happy camper but I'm not gonna whine just because I lost it fair. I had a situation in squad chat where a guy lost his tank because he called it in when he was alone and got killed as it arrived. Then he begged his team not to destroy the tank so he can get it back at the end of the match. His corp mates decided to do as he says and shelved a good forge gunner AV while the tank took out a good chunk of our clones. It was pathetic.
as a vet tank driver myself, that guy shouldv lost his tank, he took the risk and lost the reward because he let his guard down and yet his "friends" didn't let him learn the hard way NEVER to let your guard down. that truly is pathetic. |
Void Echo
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
170
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 09:24:00 -
[26] - Quote
it would make sense for an RDV to pick up my tank when im recalling it, after all that's how it was deployed too, but if that's going to be implemented then once the RDV has the tank it should take no damage while being flown away |
Esper Shadows
Savage Arms INC
27
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 11:25:00 -
[27] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Doc Noah wrote:Esper Shadows wrote:Well look at it this way, your proto dropsuit can cost a million+ ISK, but nobody can hack it and steal it. But million+ ISK vehicles CAN. Now, its fun to hack stuff, so hacking vehicles is in the game. But its fair to at least return it to the owner if it doesn't get blown up during the match.
Infantry-only players don't have to worry about their suits getting hacked. But vehicle-specced players have to worry about it every match. Try to put yourself in the other guy's shoes.
If they hack it back, sure, but if its in the hands of the enemy, then no. You lost the vehicle, its your own fault and should have to deal with the consequence. Just be glad that the tank doesnt end up in the salvage of the stealer. If they manage to steal my vehicle despite every precaution I take, then they earned it. Not a happy camper but I'm not gonna whine just because I lost it fair. I had a situation in squad chat where a guy lost his tank because he called it in when he was alone and got killed as it arrived. Then he begged his team not to destroy the tank so he can get it back at the end of the match. His corp mates decided to do as he says and shelved a good forge gunner AV while the tank took out a good chunk of our clones. It was pathetic. as a vet tank driver myself, that guy shouldv lost his tank, he took the risk and lost the reward because he let his guard down and yet his "friends" didn't let him learn the hard way NEVER to let your guard down. that truly is pathetic.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining about hacking/stealing vehicles. Although I do have some serious grief with blueberries stealing my sh*t or preventing me from recalling. Since its in the game, I can live with it.
I certainly don't whine on team chat trying to save my vehicle if it gets hacked. That's sad. But one idiot's actions should not prompt a code change that impacts everyone who fields a vehicle.
I just don't like it when players who don't field vehicles complain about these esoteric features like what happens to your vehicle after the match if it was hacked but not destroyed. Like its any of there damb business. There's no gain to be had by that feature because the stolen vehicle can't be sold, and most likely you don't have the skill set to field it yourself. Its just griefing vehicle-centric players.
|
Doc Noah
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
122
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 18:13:00 -
[28] - Quote
Esper Shadows wrote:Don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining about hacking/stealing vehicles. Although I do have some serious grief with blueberries stealing my sh*t or preventing me from recalling. Since its in the game, I can live with it.
I certainly don't whine on team chat trying to save my vehicle if it gets hacked. That's sad. But one idiot's actions should not prompt a code change that impacts everyone who fields a vehicle.
I just don't like it when players who don't field vehicles complain about these esoteric features like what happens to your vehicle after the match if it was hacked but not destroyed. Like its any of there damb business. There's no gain to be had by that feature because the stolen vehicle can't be sold, and most likely you don't have the skill set to field it yourself. Its just griefing vehicle-centric players.
Except that the vehicle being returned to the owner by simply being on the field seems more like a design oversight and doesnt coincide with CCP's reputation for harsh reality You're actually doing the exact same thing he was doing, only this time with words on the forum. Disregarding reason to save some ISKs Is it griefing? No more than it is destroying someone's vehicle with AV.
Your arguments: -I dont like this idea therefore it shouldnt happen (thats more of a biased personal opinion, not a compelling argument) -Its not in the game and therefore shouldnt be in it (this game is still in it's infant stage, theres a lot of balance, game design, and gameplay changes to be made. Nothing is ever final until the fat lady sings) -It costs a lot of ISK and therefore I should get it back (terrible argument in a game where you could lose millions in one match and not from a stolen vehicle) -Its unfair to vehicle users (how is it unfair? You lost the vehicle and now its in enemy hands, think of it like a lesson learned)
Our arguments: -Risk vs reward, you lost the risk so why should you be rewarded? -Lesson learned, maybe it wont happen again, maybe. Cant learn when you arent punished for your own mistake -Makes absolutely no sense for the vehicle to be gracefully handed back at the end of a match, it WOULD make more sense if it was pocketed by the stealer but thats a different topic altogether (one I'll have to argue against) -You let it happen and now you want out the easy way, thats not how it works in New Eden -You can still hack it back, only it wont be as easy as looking the other way when it comes time to destroy it -We could simply destroy it ourselves by ditching it on the roadside or go headfirst into a group of enemy AV, why should you get to keep it if we chose to hold onto it through the match?
Probably more arguments but I'm just going off the top of my head. |
KEROSIINI-TERO
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
437
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 19:08:00 -
[29] - Quote
I was about to create a post about recalling vehicles being too instantaneous. Hopefully the OP edits the thread title to be more informative, like "FEEDBACK: Vehicle recalling too easy"
You got my point. Reasons for that are: - Hacking takes only a short time - Vehicle begins to dematerialize IMMEDIATELY which is the biggest issue - RDV is not used in recalling
I understand it takes serious effort to create algorithms for bolas able to enter the field and pickup from whereever. But it actual recalling should be at least scheduled.
DISCLAIMER: If someone thinks this is a rant of a sadface AV runner, I do use tanks. Example: Recalling A-I blaster tank at first sight of red tank and swapping to rail to pop it While railtanking on far hills and being sacked by AV infantry, just reverse 20m into cover and recall precious tank. After that, shoot red swarms and forges into head with TAC AR. So too easy from that point of view also. |
Onesimus Tarsus
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
317
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 19:38:00 -
[30] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:Your proto suit gets instantaneously saved at a supply depot, does it not? At least we have to jump out of our vehicles and be vulnerable for five whole seconds.
I believe neither of these options should exist. Nor should nanohives or resupply of any kind. Don't shoot what you can't afford to lose. No shield recharge or armor repair either. The consequence of pulling the trigger, donchaknow. Matter of fact, each player gets a set number of completely irretrievably gone items per match and after that, you're in the bleachers. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |