It shouldn't take entire squads of AV to deal with anything when one person can operate a vehicle.

One guy running a Logistics LAV can effectively ruin a battle because they're so difficult to kill.

One guy running an HAV (who knows what the hell he is doing) can force an entire squad's worth of players to go AV and put the team at a massive disadvantage because now they suddenly are playing 10 against 15 infantry-wise (-6 from the AV squad and -1 from the HAV driver)

When it takes an entire squad to operate an HAV, I'll accept requiring an entire squad of AV. Until then, vehicles only upset the balance of teams in this game. Open world environment doesn't have that issue but when you have 16 v 16, it creates a giant gap in the power balance.

And honestly, it shouldn't take more than one round from my Proto AV gear to kill a Militia LAV. I put millions of SP into it, and heaps of ISK. You put nothing into yours. Why should you have an advantage?

Oh thank goodness. Thought I was shooting blanks. Was going to see the Doctor next week.

Rather than make LAV strikes less damaging CCP just needs to inflict the same amount of damage on the LAV that it causes. Maybe not the best use of Netwon's Laws of Motion but it is simple and fair.

Let the LAV Menace continue. There are Logi LAV drivers who have been waiting so very long for their revenge.

LAVS are crazy every game you go there is like 2-3 guys driving around going like 8-1 15-1 in LAVs. I am thinking of just playing in BPO and running people over.

Rather than make LAV strikes less damaging CCP just needs to inflict the same amount of damage on the LAV that it causes.

How is that fair? Could you possibly explain how that's fair?

Which part?

1. Conservation of Momentum
2. The LAV Menace
3. Forge Guns potentially phasing through targets. (unlikely this one but had to list all because a three-point bulletin looks smarter)

Hitting a dropsuit doing the equal amount of damage to the vehicle.

I don't care of the defensive capabilities of LAVs. However it is bullshit how easy it is be killed simply by being hit by one. Seriously, it should either take out our shields or take 50% of our total health.

Another one that wishes for physics to be thrown out because they can't bother with any AV capability.

Go back to Call of Duty.

All the more reason to take away the BPO's for vehicles and nerf the HP for LAVs, say 15%.

Actually the one hit kill by a vehicle is more COD than what the previous person was asking for.

No reason to be a crappy to someone.

There's no reason for physics to be denied just because he gets killed when things work the way they're supposed to. Why shouldn't people be killed by vehicles when they're moving at a decent speed? Like I've said before, the armor LAVs weigh a couple of tons. Is there any valid, logical reason that a few thousand pounds traveling 70mph shouldn't easily kill a dropsuit?

There is no logic and no need for it. It's a GAME, bases on science fiction, and Should be BALANCED. Also you are a complete Dbag and nowhere near as intelligent as you would like others to believe.

Another one that wishes for physics to be thrown out because they can't bother with any AV capability.

Go back to Call of Duty.

Why can't inertia dampeners work the other way? Since when did COD have vehicles in multiplayer other then tanks in WAW? You do realize this game attracks the cod/battlefield crowd. Also go suck a chode.

EDIT: why the hell would I run a tank when I can kill loads more people with a ****ing LAV?

EDIT: why the hell would I run a tank when I can kill loads more people with a ****ing LAV?

EDIT: why the hell would I run a tank when I can kill loads more people with a ****ing LAV?

Fix radar so lavs can't sneak up on people and it'd be fine. There's no reason hav and lav shouldn't be on radar 100% of the time. That or make AV less boring so folks actually use it. Swarms suck and nobody wants to be super slow to use forge.

why the hell would I run a tank when I can kill loads more people with a ****ing LAV?