OP
One of the many reasons this game sux.

LAV road killing is a game breaking exploit. Tac AR is one of the only weapons with reasonable range compared to map designs of dust... And I only have adv med frame suit and glu tac... U mad?

Yeah bravo, high-five, slow clap. It must take major skill to sit in the driver seat.

yea. always fun to end up in a blueberry patch. none of us take that seriously of course. it's evident you didn't go up against anyone who knew what they were doing.

The reduced range of all other weapons created the tac epidemic... If they increase the range of other weapons we will see much less tac use.

It shouldn't take entire squads of AV to deal with anything when one person can operate a vehicle.

One guy running a Logistics LAV can effectively ruin a battle because they're so difficult to kill.

One guy running an HAV (who knows what the hell he is doing) can force an entire squad's worth of players to go AV and put the team at a massive disadvantage because now they suddenly are playing 10 against 15 infantry-wise (-6 from the AV squad and -1 from the HAV driver)

When it takes an entire squad to operate an HAV, I'll accept requiring an entire squad of AV. Until then, vehicles only upset the balance of teams in this game. Open world environment doesn't have that issue but when you have 16 v 16, it creates a giant gap in the power balance.

And honestly, it shouldn't take more than one round from my Proto AV gear to kill a Militia LAV. I put millions of SP into it, and heaps of ISK. You put nothing into yours. Why should you have an advantage?

I have witnessed Forge guns shooting through moving lavs and av nades tracking but not damaging them...
Couple that with their speed and they can retreat, repair, repeat. But the logi lavs don't even need to retreat as they can tank like crazy.

I have no problem with them being tough... It's the insta kill of any suit at any speed. They need to MASSIVELY reduce the impact damage to reduce them back to a transport vehicle with the turret being the best offense it has.

What do damage mods and tac ars have to do with anything... I have been hit for over 10,000 damage by a LAV... That is the wrong answer in a first person shooter. The turret or "shooter" part of the lav should be the threat.

You people are fcukin re tar did

Yeah, see that to me seems like a major imbalance. You'll never see two guys going AV an entire match and landing two orbitals. Not with all of that anti-infantry capability running around on the enemy team.

It seems a little ridiculous that a Tank can offset the balance to such an extreme, right down to removing enemy vehicles from play before they even land when using a Railgun. Then again, I've kept that from happening using a Railgun Installation.

This isn't to say Tanks should be nerfed, but their mechanics shouldn't allow for ROFLROLLING from such a small team. I look at tanks in two fashions: Long range, active tanking which can survive the first few shots and have to find cover to make repairs - and short range, passive tanking which can survive entire onslaughts of AV but at the cost of not being able to repair it very quickly.

Unfortunately, considering HAVs move faster than Scouts, this isn't the case. Most of the time they'll just slowly accelerate until they get into the Red-line and make a full recovery, or sit ontop of a -******* skyscraper- where even Orbital Strikes can't kill them.

And it's at most three guys out of the entire team.

Then again, if you applied a maximum ammo count on them.............................

The most skill intensive ships in Eve Online aren't good at everything, in fact, they can't even hit the smaller ships that aren't as skill intensive.

Sure, you should have the ability to defend yourself, but Tankers should not be the end-all to everything in the game. They need to have a definite counter that they are poor against, something that isn't currently available. Abusing game mechanics only compounds that.

Oh thank goodness. Thought I was shooting blanks. Was going to see the Doctor next week.

Rather than make LAV strikes less damaging CCP just needs to inflict the same amount of damage on the LAV that it causes. Maybe not the best use of Netwon's Laws of Motion but it is simple and fair.

Let the LAV Menace continue. There are Logi LAV drivers who have been waiting so very long for their revenge.

Which part?

1. Conservation of Momentum
2. The LAV Menace
3. Forge Guns potentially phasing through targets. (unlikely this one but had to list all because a three-point bulletin looks smarter)

I don't care of the defensive capabilities of LAVs. However it is bullshit how easy it is be killed simply by being hit by one. Seriously, it should either take out our shields or take 50% of our total health.

All the more reason to take away the BPO's for vehicles and nerf the HP for LAVs, say 15%.

Actually the one hit kill by a vehicle is more COD than what the previous person was asking for.

No reason to be a crappy to someone.

There is no logic and no need for it. It's a GAME, bases on science fiction, and Should be BALANCED. Also you are a complete Dbag and nowhere near as intelligent as you would like others to believe.

Fix radar so lavs can't sneak up on people and it'd be fine. There's no reason hav and lav shouldn't be on radar 100% of the time. That or make AV less boring so folks actually use it. Swarms suck and nobody wants to be super slow to use forge.