He played more than 5 battles. Other morons are saying he lied that SR are Aur he didn't say they were he said the name of the variant that is Aur based. He was only honest in the entire review he didn't bash the game for the sake of bashing he was just pointing out a few flaws and did it hilariously

He described a scrambler rifle as a cool weapon and talked about how it works and such. There are variants that are obviously not behind a paywall that function exactly the same way. It was a dishonest comment, you imbecile.

He played more than 5 battles. Other morons are saying he lied that SR are Aur he didn't say they were he said the name of the variant that is Aur based. He was only honest in the entire review he didn't bash the game for the sake of bashing he was just pointing out a few flaws and did it hilariously

The reviewer couldn't be bothered to point out that there's an isk variant of the same gun. This gives the outside impression of SCRs beeing AUR only.

If he knew that there's an ISK variant than that's called deception by omission and is technically equivalent to lying. If he didn't than he failed to do basic research wich undermines any credibility of his statements.

His job is to properly inform consumers on the qualities of a product and provide an educated if also subjective assesment. The subjective part is open for discussion. Stating falsehoods as fact, thereby leading to ill informed consumer decisions is a clear failure, be it deliberate or not.

Watched the review, and that guy must of played 10 minutes and logged off, one of the worst reviews ever and completly full of hate. He does have some points but most of them are completly false. But we gotta be honest also, CCP brought this unto themselves, they should had never released the game on 14/5. It was a rushed launch that while helping the initial boost (check the increasing player count in server) its only going to hinder it in the long run when hacks like this reviewer who expect a cod/bf clone try to play it and its so daunting that that bash it without giving it a chance.

he made a couple of valid points but most of the stuff he said was subjective.

however i do agree that when compared to older iterations, modern skirmish feels way too generic.

Ya in 10 mins he clearly played like 10 maps with AR and played like 20 more maps. I guess you couldn't notice the environments changing? Blue dots....

Oh great elitist player who clearly should of learned about "hyperbole" and clearly should of learned about something called editing and making a point.

If you watch it again he says the ASHBOURNE Scrambler Rifle which is the Aur variant.

Clearly don't like the truth huh?

HAHA you must not play PC.

He never made clear what "Ashborne" means. No one who didn't know beforehand could know this is a specific AUR variant of an isk weapon that is readily available. Without these details, viewers are deceived into believing that there is no isk variant and that theres no way to get its funcionality without paying AUR. We know this is wrong but no one could know otherwise just by watching this video.

What baffles me is the fact that all the people who seem to hate this game, still put in effort to post on the forums. If you really hate it, grow a pair and leave, no one is forcing you to stay here and the ge is free...

What baffles me is the fact that all the people who seem to hate this game, still put in effort to post on the forums. If you really hate it, grow a pair and leave, no one is forcing you to stay here and the ge is free...

Is gametrailers.com affiliated with XBox/Microsoft?
There's a lot of XB adverts over there, even tho it itself isn't an absolute indication.

Is gametrailers.com affiliated with XBox/Microsoft?
There's a lot of XB adverts over there, even tho it itself isn't an absolute indication.

Lol! Are you sure? Right after that he says there is variants that can be bought with in game resources but they are a expensive and can be a grind to get them......Lol......Checkm8.....

Did you guys even watch the review? I am starting to think you didn't....Lol!

I expected it to be bad, but dayum, 4.4. Dust gets a solid 6 in my book as a shooter, and 9-10 for potential. Nevertheless, their main criticisms were perfectly valid, although there were some plain mistakes in the review.

I've been warning about the poor gunplay for months, and have said several times the game was released too early. It is a closed beta quality product now, and should have not been given out to the masses, yet. CCP can only blame themselves.

I expected it to be bad, but dayum, 4.4. Dust gets a solid 6 in my book as a shooter, and 9-10 for potential. Nevertheless, their main criticisms were perfectly valid, although there were some plain mistakes in the review.

I've been warning about the poor gunplay for months, and have said several times the game was released too early. It is a closed beta quality product now, and should have not been given out to the masses, yet. CCP can only blame themselves.

What baffles me is the fact that all the people who seem to hate this game, still put in effort to post on the forums. If you really hate it, grow a pair and leave, no one is forcing you to stay here and the ge is free...

Can't rate a game on potential only in the now. Dust is a 4.4 as a shooter it's below sub par