Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tuna the Fish
Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
It seems to me that "playing the metagame" is just glorified/encouraged griefing. Congratulations, you and your buddies hijacked someone else's match and teamkilled them till they lost. The only difference between griefing in dust and griefing in other games is that in dust people will pay you for it.
But that's not the point of this topic. The question I pose to you: Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame, or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new? |
Daedric Lothar
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
384
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Oh look, another OMG SPIES thread. |
Kira Lannister
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
904
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
Protip: If you sabotage do it right. Not like Beta...ehem...failmax :] |
Banned From Forums
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
65
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tuna the Fish wrote:It seems to me that "playing the metagame" is just glorified/encouraged griefing. Congratulations, you and your buddies hijacked someone else's match and teamkilled them till they lost. The only difference between griefing in dust and griefing in other games is that in dust people will pay you for it.
But that's not the point of this topic. The question I pose to you: Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame, or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new?
Meta gaming: The act of using fail tactics to get the better of someone just because you suck!
|
Banned From Forums
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
65
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:Protip: If you sabotage do it right. Not like Beta...ehem...failmax :]
Meta gaming with Betamax is still in its Beta stage. It will be out SoonGäó! |
dent 308
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1386
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:02:00 -
[6] - Quote
Playing the meta game is as much about friends as it is about making enemies. |
Tuna the Fish
Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:04:00 -
[7] - Quote
Daedric Lothar wrote:Oh look, another OMG SPIES thread.
Not quite. Try re-reading the second paragraph.
Anyone care to give an on-topic reply?
Edit: Thank you, dent 308. Anyone else? |
Dust HaHakoke
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
well other then greifing there is moral part of the metagame is making your corp look good and the other guys bad. You can slander the other guy question his leadership or you can make quailty of life improvements to a corp gaining better players simply cause your corp seems the best option for whatever reason.
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
479
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
Tuna the Fish wrote:It seems to me that "playing the metagame" is just glorified/encouraged griefing. Congratulations, you and your buddies hijacked someone else's match and teamkilled them till they lost. The only difference between griefing in dust and griefing in other games is that in dust people will pay you for it.
But that's not the point of this topic. The question I pose to you: Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame, or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new?
Meta gaming in New Eden generally requires an intricate knowledge of most dramas going on at any one moment, so it will always exclude new players. Developing trusted allies is still meta gaming IMO. If you sell your services as a merc, you can establish a good rep with the corps, and managing that rep when you inevitably get hired against previous employers could be quite a challenge. Especially having seen the tantrums thrown in the war room by certain corps. |
Baracka Flocka Flame
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
Meta gaming isn't all about greifing and harassing, your just witnessing what happens when kids think they are meta gaming by bringing in a spy to disrupt 1 little battle in a war for some lulz. I wouldnt consider that meta gaming at all, just kids being kids and using a mechanic to their advantage at the moment.
Like the posts above me say meta gaming is lots of things. As a new player, ya you wouldnt really be involved in this. |
|
Tuna the Fish
Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:13:00 -
[11] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Tuna the Fish wrote:It seems to me that "playing the metagame" is just glorified/encouraged griefing. Congratulations, you and your buddies hijacked someone else's match and teamkilled them till they lost. The only difference between griefing in dust and griefing in other games is that in dust people will pay you for it.
But that's not the point of this topic. The question I pose to you: Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame, or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new? Meta gaming in New Eden generally requires an intricate knowledge of most dramas going on at any one moment, so it will always exclude new players. Developing trusted allies is still meta gaming IMO. If you sell your services as a merc, you can establish a good rep with the corps, and managing that rep when you inevitably get hired against previous employers could be quite a challenge. Especially having seen the tantrums thrown in the war room by certain corps.
I'm not to worried about being excluded at this point since I am so new. What I was concerned with is that my only options seemed to be either grief or be griefed. However, the idea of building a reputation as a merc does sound appealing. |
Dust HaHakoke
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:16:00 -
[12] - Quote
iI once ran part of a corp in eve online its not exactly easy my job was more or less to help to decide in corp ideas and rules. Well that and to explain to the new guys what the corp expects where it is going how were going to get there etc. never liked the job but it was MY job |
Natu Nobilis
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
295
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:18:00 -
[13] - Quote
Tuna the Fish wrote:It seems to me that "playing the metagame" is just glorified/encouraged griefing. Congratulations, you and your buddies hijacked someone else's match and teamkilled them till they lost. The only difference between griefing in dust and griefing in other games is that in dust people will pay you for it.
But that's not the point of this topic. The question I pose to you: Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame, or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new?
We play a console game. It has certain rules and mechanics. I can pick weapons, vehicles, skills, and use them to accomplish certain objectives written in the rules. (Remove all opponent clones or destroy the MCC). That-¦s the game.
The metagame can be all the things you do outside this mechanic, or using it in non-conventional ways. It can be elaborated, or simple, but it-¦s a game within the game.
Examples:
- You infiltrate a group so you can have access to their information, and pass it to third parties, be it for fun, intel gathering, or profit.
- You can infiltrate a group so you can gather power within the ranks and use this power in was that are harmful to this group, benefic to other groups, or both of them. It doesn-¦t matter the timeframe of the infiltration, you can go for a soldier that doesn-¦t fight in a battle or pretends that he-¦s a bad player, a squad leader that invites unexpected people to important battles, a Field Commander that deliberately uses corporations assets in ways that are harmful to the corporation, an accountant that empties the corporation wallet, a director that removes all money, assets and players, taking the name of the corporation / alliance hostage and ultimately ripping a form of identity from the group.
- You can use the forums / blogs / news to make propaganda and psyops that may result in the target losing members, making moves that didn-¦t got proper planning, losing allies due to uncovered / fake information, or simply to manipulate the players and the market in a way that is benefitial for you, making everyone sell/buy a specific item/service.
- You can create a persona that shows up on the news, writes articles for game sites, have their own game site, got removed from the CSM for telling people to commit suicide, and be a famous internet person.
- You can create a real service and make real money with apps and services related to the game, and even commit the illegality of RTM for a time before being permabanned by CCP.
You can do a lot of things. Filling a squad with hostile combatants is nothing. If people get stressed over this, then the future is going to be a pleasure.
Think outside the box. Having good reflexes in a protosuit with a good weapon is not the only thing that counts in this world.
|
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2167
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:19:00 -
[14] - Quote
I have to agree. Meta gaming exists in almost every game. Simply being here on the forums, getting info on bug/glitches/fits ect is meta gaming.
The EvE community however, seems to feel griefing is meta gaming, and CCP back them. Which is total BS imho. I think this is an issue which will continue to plague CCPs games.
I will not defend saboteurs or griefers however, the enemy of my enemy... |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
2377
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:25:00 -
[15] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:I have to agree. Meta gaming exists in almost every game. Simply being here on the forums, getting info on bug/glitches/fits ect is meta gaming.
The EvE community however, seems to feel griefing is meta gaming, and CCP back them. Which is total BS imho. I think this is an issue which will continue to plague CCPs games.
I will not defend saboteurs or griefers however, the enemy of my enemy...
If griefing as a meta game is a problem for CCP, how do you explain the success of Eve? |
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet
875
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:29:00 -
[16] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:
I will not defend saboteurs or griefers however, the enemy of my enemy...
is my enemy's enemy.
And how dare you besmirch the name of your King.
mittani is King of Space and he bent over backwards to repent his one sin ever. Lesser minds cannot comprehend this magnanimity and seek to bring yet more shame to his name.
Also the metagame makes this bad game good.
I approve of this AWOXING service and intend to utilize it to the fullest extent possible...
After I start caring about planetary Conquest. |
RKKR
The Southern Legion RISE of LEGION
26
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:33:00 -
[17] - Quote
Excuse me for my post but I couldn't help myself.
Daedric Lothar wrote:Oh look, another OMG SPIES thread.
Aren't you supposed to link to your own thread now? But wait this thread isn't about OMG Spies so you can't...
|
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2167
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:35:00 -
[18] - Quote
@maken nOOb corps, hi sec, concord & gate guns. Griefing exists in many games. Diablo ii HC was the best/worst. Damn hydra sorcs & their TPs.
@Breakin I think you'll find someone like mittens has more than a single sin to his soul. To become king often requires great sacrifice. Winter is comming and all that jazz. |
Natu Nobilis
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
295
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:43:00 -
[19] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:I have to agree. Meta gaming exists in almost every game. Simply being here on the forums, getting info on bug/glitches/fits ect is meta gaming.
The EvE community however, seems to feel griefing is meta gaming, and CCP back them. Which is total BS imho. I think this is an issue which will continue to plague CCPs games.
I will not defend saboteurs or griefers however, the enemy of my enemy...
CCP doesn-¦t endorse griefing. They have sandobx games that have emergent gameplay.
That being said, if you thing that you-¦re being harassed or you can-¦t play the game because of someone (he bumps you out of your minning position and it doesn-¦t matter how many systems you jump, he follows you and you can-¦t play for example), you-¦re welcome to file a petition. Harass and griefing is no good.
What people call griefing however, is another story.
Soon we-¦ll have people calling "Oh, but he killed me 20 times with his protosuit, while i only have STD" griefing. |
Lord Kira DeAurum
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:00:00 -
[20] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote:Tony Calif wrote:I have to agree. Meta gaming exists in almost every game. Simply being here on the forums, getting info on bug/glitches/fits ect is meta gaming.
The EvE community however, seems to feel griefing is meta gaming, and CCP back them. Which is total BS imho. I think this is an issue which will continue to plague CCPs games.
I will not defend saboteurs or griefers however, the enemy of my enemy... CCP doesn-¦t endorse griefing. They have sandobx games that have emergent gameplay. That being said, if you thing that you-¦re being harassed or you can-¦t play the game because of someone (he bumps you out of your minning position and it doesn-¦t matter how many systems you jump, he follows you and you can-¦t play for example), you-¦re welcome to file a petition. Harass and griefing is no good. What people call griefing however, is another story. Soon we-¦ll have people calling "Oh, but he killed me 20 times with his protosuit, while i only have STD" griefing.
Failmax needs grief counseling after their failed atempt at griefing.
Getting griefed while they grief? GRIEFCEPTION
|
|
Tuna the Fish
Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:07:00 -
[21] - Quote
Lord Kira DeAurum wrote:Natu Nobilis wrote:Tony Calif wrote:I have to agree. Meta gaming exists in almost every game. Simply being here on the forums, getting info on bug/glitches/fits ect is meta gaming.
The EvE community however, seems to feel griefing is meta gaming, and CCP back them. Which is total BS imho. I think this is an issue which will continue to plague CCPs games.
I will not defend saboteurs or griefers however, the enemy of my enemy... CCP doesn-¦t endorse griefing. They have sandobx games that have emergent gameplay. That being said, if you thing that you-¦re being harassed or you can-¦t play the game because of someone (he bumps you out of your minning position and it doesn-¦t matter how many systems you jump, he follows you and you can-¦t play for example), you-¦re welcome to file a petition. Harass and griefing is no good. What people call griefing however, is another story. Soon we-¦ll have people calling "Oh, but he killed me 20 times with his protosuit, while i only have STD" griefing. Failmax needs grief counseling after their failed atempt at griefing. Getting griefed while they grief? GRIEFCEPTION
Yo Dawg, I herd you like griefing, so I put some grief in your grief so you can grieve while you grief. |
Skyhound Solbrave
Rough Riders..
97
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:13:00 -
[22] - Quote
Eve is famous for the backstabbings, infiltrations, and robbings that go on in their corporations. Crashing a PC battle and TKing is pretty much militia-level metagaming if you ask me.
Though now the major corps have caught on that this is in fact, Eve-on-the-ground and will learn to prevent such things from happening. Usually they will use holding or auxillary corps for new members to join and they can prove their skills and trustworthiness through their actions in these scrub corps and will be filtered through to the main corp. True spies and saboteurs go through the entire process, making an entirely new character and persona that can be just as hardcore as any of us. They make friends within the corp, help them with their life problems, become true bros, until BAM! the moment to strike. It'll be when they make Director of the main corp or in charge of a particularly important match. They will burn the house down and never be heard from again.
|
Lord Kira DeAurum
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:16:00 -
[23] - Quote
So if crashing a pc battle is militia grade metagaming, and failmax failed at that...
That means they achieved Failing Proficiency Lvl. 5 |
Succendo
Goonfeet
11
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:21:00 -
[24] - Quote
Wars aren't won by boots on the ground. Wars are won via logistics, morale, and intel.
Sorry that you are so resistant to such a basic strategy lesson. |
Natu Nobilis
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
296
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:24:00 -
[25] - Quote
Succendo wrote:Wars aren't won by boots on the ground. Wars are won via logistics, morale, and intel.
Sorry that you are so resistant to such a basic strategy lesson.
Do we introduce them to Sun Tzu? |
lllIIIlI IIIlIl
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
36
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:34:00 -
[26] - Quote
The only thing the metagame does in dust is provide an excuse when someone acts like a spastic or a justification for why the core FPS mechanics are so bad. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
3128
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:37:00 -
[27] - Quote
The mentality behind using tactics unintended by CCP (mechanical oversights) as "legitimate tactics" is troubling.
When Immobile Infantry handled the finding of infinite Precision Strikes primarily inhouse and out of actual matches, instead of abusing it in game for their benefit, I ultimately thought that was very cool and "professional" of them. They tested it, duplicated it, and reported it, all off the grid so no one was abusing it.
Yet, CCPs OWN ELECT happily and freely use these loopholes and tag them as "legitimate tactics".
Of course you can sit there and say "oh we're trying to fix it and talk to CCP about it" but the fact that it's readily and casually used in the gaming environment....yea, it just doesn't sit right with me. |
Natu Nobilis
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
296
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:45:00 -
[28] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:The mentality behind using tactics unintended by CCP (mechanical oversights) as "legitimate tactics" is troubling.
When Immobile Infantry handled the finding of infinite Precision Strikes primarily inhouse and out of actual matches, instead of abusing it in game for their benefit, I ultimately thought that was very cool and "professional" of them. They tested it, duplicated it, and reported it, all off the grid so no one was abusing it.
Yet, CCPs OWN ELECT happily and freely use these loopholes and tag them as "legitimate tactics".
Of course you can sit there and say "oh we're trying to fix it and talk to CCP about it" but the fact that it's readily and casually used in the gaming environment....yea, it just doesn't sit right with me.
OB to be used, needs every X ammount of WP. That-¦s the mechanic.
If i find out that i can go X, -50, X, -50, that-¦s a bug. If people use the bug for personal gain, that-¦s an exploit.
**
I-¦m a squad leader, therefore, i invite people to squads. That-¦s the mechanic.
I find out that i can invite hostiles to a battle. That-¦s NOT an exploit.
If the difference between each case is not clear, it-¦s going to be very complicated to talk about emergent gameplay, or a game where "shoot shoot, kill kill, i killed most therefore i win" is not the plan. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
3129
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:50:00 -
[29] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:The mentality behind using tactics unintended by CCP (mechanical oversights) as "legitimate tactics" is troubling.
When Immobile Infantry handled the finding of infinite Precision Strikes primarily inhouse and out of actual matches, instead of abusing it in game for their benefit, I ultimately thought that was very cool and "professional" of them. They tested it, duplicated it, and reported it, all off the grid so no one was abusing it.
Yet, CCPs OWN ELECT happily and freely use these loopholes and tag them as "legitimate tactics".
Of course you can sit there and say "oh we're trying to fix it and talk to CCP about it" but the fact that it's readily and casually used in the gaming environment....yea, it just doesn't sit right with me. OB to be used, needs every X ammount of WP. That-¦s the mechanic. If i find out that i can go X, -50, X, -50, that-¦s a bug. If people use the bug for personal gain, that-¦s an exploit. ** I-¦m a squad leader, therefore, i invite people to squads. That-¦s the mechanic. I find out that i can invite hostiles to a battle. That-¦s NOT an exploit. If the difference between each case is not clear, it-¦s going to be very complicated to talk about emergent gameplay, or a game where "shoot shoot, kill kill, i killed most therefore i win" is not the plan.
Yet the simple lack of a mechanic as simple as roles or being able to remove people from combat has caused corporations to have to splinter off and go through silly loopholes and be hyper paranoid of every single applicant, because they have no control over what happens if someone goes rogue, because battle commanders forget how to cut clones off from the clone vat.
The second you're on the field, any clone vat will do. Why we don't just spawn on our enemies CRUs is beyond me
You would think that a member of CPM, CCPs own elected official, would take that information straight to CCP and try to hammer out an option BEFORE it came to light.
Emergent gameplay is one thing. That's cool and important. Finding a loophole and abusing it for your own gain at the expense of others is childish and bad form for a community representative.
The fact that this wasn't addressed before it came to light is the real issue at hand.
|
Natu Nobilis
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
297
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:59:00 -
[30] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Yet the simple lack of a mechanic as simple as roles or being able to remove people from combat has caused corporations to have to splinter off and go through silly loopholes and be hyper paranoid of every single applicant, because they have no control over what happens if someone goes rogue, because battle commanders forget how to cut clones off from the clone vat. The second you're on the field, any clone vat will do. Why we don't just spawn on our enemies CRUs is beyond me You would think that a member of CPM, CCPs own elected official, would take that information straight to CCP and try to hammer out an option BEFORE it came to light. Emergent gameplay is one thing. That's cool and important. Finding a loophole and abusing it for your own gain at the expense of others is childish and bad form for a community representative. The fact that this wasn't addressed before it came to light is the real issue at hand.
I-¦m in favor of more mechanics like roles and proper command structure, so the RTS side can be improved. That being said.
1 - Even with a lot of roles in EVE, people still use Holding corporations for alliances. (Smart one at least) 2 - Being paranoid about applicants should be a must, regardless of roles no? 3 - How can they take to CCP a long known mechanic that should be refined, i agree, but is not "broken" (incomplete i would say) 4 - How is this a loophole, or an abuse? 5 - It was adressed before
|
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
3129
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 21:05:00 -
[31] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote: 4 - How is this a loophole, or an abuse?
Well my understanding of the "mechanic" in question is fuzzy at best, I haven't had any experience with it first hand.
From what I hear, a squad leader or "spy" manages to hop into a PC battle alone by spamming X early on to ensure they get in. Then, they pull in a group of hostiles.
The battle commander (which doesn't even exist yet) can't cut off these clones access to his clone vats. The second they hit that war barge, they're in for the duration.
This doesn't require "infiltration" and does not break "trust" because it's so simple, has devastating results (unless you're BetaMax ), and is rather rewarding for the griefer in both time wasted and tears harvested.
It's childish, and not making this a top priority is dangerous for the metagame. This is the type of thing that CPM should be working to fix, that break further. |
Ender Storm
Goonfeet
50
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 21:07:00 -
[32] - Quote
Tuna the Fish wrote:It seems to me that "playing the metagame" is just glorified/encouraged griefing. Congratulations, you and your buddies hijacked someone else's match and teamkilled them till they lost. The only difference between griefing in dust and griefing in other games is that in dust people will pay you for it.
But that's not the point of this topic. The question I pose to you: Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame, or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new?
Yes theres metagame that dosent involve activities that might be considered unfair for the faint of heart.
An alliance leader can engage in treaties, a player can act as a diplomat, you can forge alliances and manipulate the geopolitics of the universe. |
Setaceous Prime
Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 21:11:00 -
[33] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Tony Calif wrote:I have to agree. Meta gaming exists in almost every game. Simply being here on the forums, getting info on bug/glitches/fits ect is meta gaming.
The EvE community however, seems to feel griefing is meta gaming, and CCP back them. Which is total BS imho. I think this is an issue which will continue to plague CCPs games.
I will not defend saboteurs or griefers however, the enemy of my enemy... If griefing as a meta game is a problem for CCP, how do you explain the success of Eve? AFK mining and a steady turnover of newbies. |
Natu Nobilis
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
298
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 21:41:00 -
[34] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Natu Nobilis wrote: 4 - How is this a loophole, or an abuse?
Well my understanding of the "mechanic" in question is fuzzy at best, I haven't had any experience with it first hand. From what I hear, a squad leader or "spy" manages to hop into a PC battle alone by spamming X early on to ensure they get in. Then, they pull in a group of hostiles. The battle commander (which doesn't even exist yet) can't cut off these clones access to his clone vats. The second they hit that war barge, they're in for the duration. This doesn't require "infiltration" and does not break "trust" because it's so simple, has devastating results (unless you're BetaMax ), and is rather rewarding for the griefer in both time wasted and tears harvested. It's childish, and not making this a top priority is dangerous for the metagame. This is the type of thing that CPM should be working to fix, that break further.
I agree that the system can be improved, no question about it. I-¦ve made a topic on the subject.
Today in EVE, you can invite anyone to your squad, and sometimes you invite the enemy, so he can join you, and you warp to him for the kill.
If recruiters put everyone that say X in a squad, they should be punished for their lack of security, but calling it a bad mechanic? What would be a "good" mechanic? Invites restricted to corp members? (That-¦s more harm than good and kills Merc work)
I agree with the ingame restrictions, check the topic.
|
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
574
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 21:57:00 -
[35] - Quote
At the end of the day, metagame is, simply put, politics. For example, my corp (corp A) wants to attack corp B's districts. However, they're much larger than us, so even mounting multiple attacks on multiple districts at the same time isn't going to help us. So, we talk to corp C about helping us attack corp B. Luckily, corp B has 20 districts, and we between enough have enough to attack all 20. Effectively, we're in a temporary, unofficial alliance.
So we attack all 20 districts at the same time every day for 3-4 days to wear their clones down. They will lose at least a few districts if your players are good enough.
That's a part of the metagame. Another wholly legal part is the griefing part. The most exciting and newsworthy part, really. Untold damage just for a few clicks of a button? Awesome. |
Ignatius Crumwald
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
478
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 22:12:00 -
[36] - Quote
Don't listen to any of these people. The key to understanding The Meta Game is as follows:
First, time travel to 1982.
Ok, now drive out to a rest stop anywhere on the US interstate. Next, walk out toward the woods until you hear rustling, then pull down your pants, bend over, and open your mouth wide as can be. Enjoy.
TA-DA!!! META GAME!!!
|
Marston VC
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
254
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 23:02:00 -
[37] - Quote
its just drama between alliance and corp leaders, nothing more. |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
452
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 23:37:00 -
[38] - Quote
What betamax and other corps did is no more meta-game than somebody hacking the server and booting the entire enemy team from a match.
And as a result of what they did, now every corp out there is going to give new members the heave-ho or stick them in some babysitting corp, which isn't exactly helping the longevity of this game by getting more people to play.
Think about it this way, remember when the Warriors exploited the repair tool to get tons and tons of WP several builds ago? Remember the consequence of that? Yup, CCP removed the ability to gain points from repairing. Which ended up hurting the people who actually used it for legit purposes (which was 99% of players). This is a case of one ruining it for the rest in the name of meta-gaming and HTFU, when in actuality it is nothing more than an exploit of the game mechanics (or lack of game mechanics such as being able to kick players from PC matches).
Congrats, you guys found an exploit that has massively impacted the game, but don't sit there and try to say it is simply a part of the meta-game. |
Onesimus Tarsus
Planetary Response Organization
41
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 00:00:00 -
[39] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Tony Calif wrote:I have to agree. Meta gaming exists in almost every game. Simply being here on the forums, getting info on bug/glitches/fits ect is meta gaming.
The EvE community however, seems to feel griefing is meta gaming, and CCP back them. Which is total BS imho. I think this is an issue which will continue to plague CCPs games.
I will not defend saboteurs or griefers however, the enemy of my enemy... If griefing as a meta game is a problem for CCP, how do you explain the success of Eve?
The same way I'd explain the "success" of online jerk-ness in general: anonymity plus power equals jerkfest. CCP are the ultimate jerks because they encourage jerkish behavior to hopefully keep lil' wannabe jerks interested enough to spend money to pretend to be jerks in armored wetsuits. |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
254
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 00:14:00 -
[40] - Quote
Metagaming is Real Life Role Play, inside a Role Play Game ... In other words... Mixing Reality and Fiction inside an imaginary world ...
Simple Explanation ; You take the role of a fictional "character ", to achieve an objective, that is not directly connected to the game you playing.. E.g; Make A corporation lost ISK, by pretending that you are their " friend " in a personal level. ( Outside the game Environment )
Real Explanation: Is "pretending" that you are someone else. |
|
Cass Barr
Red Star. EoN.
24
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 00:48:00 -
[41] - Quote
What it appears to be most often used for around here is to describe lying, manipulating, and operating under false pretenses in order to screw over a group of people who trusted you. Which really just encompasses the espionage and sabotage parts of meta gaming.
A more complete definition would be more along the lines of any activities outside the mechanics of a game that improve upon or alter the gaming within those mechanics. At least that's my understanding of it. In this case the mechanics would be the actual battles, markets, corporation and alliance management, PC related functions, and character development. Meta would encompass the aforementioned espionage and sabotage, as well as inter-alliance politics, inter-corporation politics, personnel politics, studying common strategies and their counters, ****-talking if there's a goal it might help accomplish, whining for nerfs, arguing for buffs, researching common and effective skill builds, corporate and alliance advertising as a way to accomplish goals, following trends and happenings within the game in order to anticipate and capitalize on future events, etc etc...
While that's probably a broader definition than most would use, it's a wide ranging term and as you can see, hardly limited to one activity. |
The Loathing
The Southern Legion RISE of LEGION
77
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 02:33:00 -
[42] - Quote
Meta game is what separates Dust from other shooters. The opportunity for infiltration is an awesome subgame. However, the current system is not acceptable due to the allowance given to ACTUAL griefers.
Griefers are not people working for or being paid by other Corps to undermine an organisation. These are the spais. Griefers are notorious immature gamers who ruin a battle for the lulz. An anonymous power trip with no gain other than their backwards sense of self satisfaction. The current system allows these people to just create headaches with absolutely no consequences.
A spai infiltrates a Corp in Eve by being VERY careful. They use subtle sabotage until the time is ripe for their move. They actually get my respect at certain levels, although I cannot like a rat ever. But griefers are just a waste of Dust space, and any system that makes their pathetic fetish easier needs to be fixed. |
Mithridates VI
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
1542
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 02:35:00 -
[43] - Quote
Tuna the Fish wrote:Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame?
Yes.
I've been told that I'm one of the most overtly involved in the DUST metagame (it's not a particularly deep metagame at the moment, so it's hard to become submerged unless you're very small) so I guess it's my job to contribute to this thread.
Metagaming is any strategy, action or method used in a game while transcending the standard constraints that the game seems to offer you. Thus, the New Eden metagame is simply the use of tools other than those explicitly offered by CCP, or the creative misuse of the available tools.
In the game, your means of determining your enemy's location is a code-based scanning system, with rules for when it can ping the opponent, which you can augment with specific ingame items. Metagaming is realising that the players on the enemy team also know the opponent's position and exploiting this knowledge by means such as asking them or persuading them to disclose the information.
If you don't want to lie, steal, cheat or backstab you are still welcome to become involved in the metagame. Superficially, this is how I am involved. If you have any skills with network mapping (figuring out relationships between various players, corps, alliances), you can use such skills defensively to protect the corporation whose interests you are looking after.
If your investigative skills are strong, you can look into offers which seem too good to be true and categorically display them as the scams they are. You can trace connections between alternate accounts and protect people from giving their trust to a wolf in sheep's clothing.
There are as many "good guy" counters as there are "bad guy" exploits of the metagame, and these are all open to you.
Once the market opens, using metagame knowledge to operate in this space is another option, as well as doing corporate PR, diplomacy, mediation between warring parties, etc.
What do you want to do in New Eden?
Tuna the Fish wrote:or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new?
This is a separate issue. You're going to earn trust from ANYONE you interact with. The best way to be who you are purporting to be in this thread, a generally honest person. |
Rusty Shallows
Black Jackals
78
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 02:42:00 -
[44] - Quote
Tuna the Fish wrote:It seems to me that "playing the metagame" is just glorified/encouraged griefing. I almost said, "welcome to New Eden"
That aside you already answered the thread topic with your first sentence. There is no enlightenment here. Just one big sewer. Which isn't so bad if that falls into your definition of fun. I play for that and the cool scifi stuff.
The optimist inside me says it will grow into something more interesting with time. |
Tuna the Fish
Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 03:50:00 -
[45] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Tuna the Fish wrote:Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame? Yes. I've been told that I'm one of the most overtly involved in the DUST metagame (it's not a particularly deep metagame at the moment, so it's hard to become submerged unless you're very small) so I guess it's my job to contribute to this thread. Metagaming is any strategy, action or method used in a game while transcending the standard constraints that the game seems to offer you. Thus, the New Eden metagame is simply the use of tools other than those explicitly offered by CCP, or the creative misuse of the available tools. In the game, your means of determining your enemy's location is a code-based scanning system, with rules for when it can ping the opponent, which you can augment with specific ingame items. Metagaming is realising that the players on the enemy team also know the opponent's position and exploiting this knowledge by means such as asking them or persuading them to disclose the information. If you don't want to lie, steal, cheat or backstab you are still welcome to become involved in the metagame. Superficially, this is how I am involved. If you have any skills with network mapping (figuring out relationships between various players, corps, alliances), you can use such skills defensively to protect the corporation whose interests you are looking after. If your investigative skills are strong, you can look into offers which seem too good to be true and categorically display them as the scams they are. You can trace connections between alternate accounts and protect people from giving their trust to a wolf in sheep's clothing. There are as many "good guy" counters as there are "bad guy" exploits of the metagame, and these are all open to you. Once the market opens, using metagame knowledge to operate in this space is another option, as well as doing corporate PR, diplomacy, mediation between warring parties, etc. What do you want to do in New Eden?
This is incredibly helpful. Thank you, and thanks to everyone else who added to the conversation.
Mithridates VI wrote:Tuna the Fish wrote:or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new? This is a separate issue. You're going to earn trust from ANYONE you interact with. The best way to be who you are purporting to be in this thread, a generally honest person.
Or maybe I just want everyone to think I'm an honest person (am I doing it right? ). |
Kel Ronson
Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 07:20:00 -
[46] - Quote
Morality in New Eden. WTF is this Veggie Tails? |
Callidus Vanus
BetaMax. CRONOS.
55
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 07:32:00 -
[47] - Quote
Why all the hate? We are beta testing the AWOXING mechanic for the community and are hoping to iron out any bugs that we find. Our aim it to give Dust 514 players the best team killing experience out there.
Known bugs/potential exploits: - Loading screen bug can affect the infiltrators ability to do their job - An infiltrator can hack an installation like a CRU/supply depot/turret and have a friendly on the other team hack it back, therefore farming WP for an OB. - Infitrator vehicles run on tears, not enough tears, no fuel. (potential feature) |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Gentlemen's Agreement
110
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 07:52:00 -
[48] - Quote
Quote:Help me understand the metagame
Brain dead EvE player circle jerk who are too busy whacking it to grasp that FPS>meta |
Nariec
Carbon 7
17
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 07:56:00 -
[49] - Quote
Tuna the Fish wrote:It seems to me that "playing the metagame" is just glorified/encouraged griefing. Congratulations, you and your buddies hijacked someone else's match and teamkilled them till they lost. The only difference between griefing in dust and griefing in other games is that in dust people will pay you for it.
But that's not the point of this topic. The question I pose to you: Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame, or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new?
Play the game with your friends, have fun, you don't have to play PC to enjoy it, I play with my bestfriend, we always have a blast flying in a dropship killing tanks and reddots. Even if we lose and get redlined, we call in free LAVs and going full GTA on them. |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
254
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 08:19:00 -
[50] - Quote
Callidus Vanus wrote:Why all the hate? We are beta testing the AWOXING mechanic for the community and are hoping to iron out any bugs that we find. Our aim it to give Dust 514 players the best team killing experience out there.
Known bugs/potential exploits: - Loading screen bug can affect the infiltrators ability to do their job - An infiltrator can hack an installation like a CRU/supply depot/turret and have a friendly on the other team hack it back, therefore farming WP for an OB. - Infitrator vehicles run on tears, not enough tears, no fuel. (potential feature)
Testing metagaming ? How can you possible "Test" how stupid people are ? and how is that related to a First Person Shooter MMO ?
Priorities CCP !! |
|
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
531
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 12:39:00 -
[51] - Quote
What is the metagame? It comes down to this:
The very best of us, the true generals and leaders, may very well be able to dominate Planetary Conquest with a bare minimum of fighting.
The opposite of the metagame is the meatgame.
They're both neccesary, but one is ultimately lose and the other is ultimately win. |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Gentlemen's Agreement
112
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 17:48:00 -
[52] - Quote
Vrain Matari wrote:What is the metagame? It comes down to this:
The very best of us, the true generals and leaders, may very well be able to dominate Planetary Conquest with a bare minimum of fighting.
The opposite of the metagame is the meatgame.
They're both neccesary, but one is ultimately lose and the other is ultimately win.
Yeah sure cuz a bunch of spread sheet PvEers are going to beat people who PvP in FPS every day.
makes sense.
Yeah sure cuz a bunch of farmville in space faeries can stop 16 FPS playing teenagers from breaking their stuff.
Makes sense.
Yeah sure cuz CCP is going to design their MMOFPS End Game around what 3 players in betamax want to the detriment of their entire player base.
Makes sense.
"Metabation, might not make you blind but it will make you stupid." |
Stupid Drunk1
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
97
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 20:03:00 -
[53] - Quote
Tuna the Fish wrote:It seems to me that "playing the metagame" is just glorified/encouraged griefing. Congratulations, you and your buddies hijacked someone else's match and teamkilled them till they lost. The only difference between griefing in dust and griefing in other games is that in dust people will pay you for it.
But that's not the point of this topic. The question I pose to you: Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame, or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new?
Ill try to shine this in a different light for you. First, your impression of the metagame are accurate, but you left out a key component. Nextly, their cannot be darkness without light, evil without good, ying/yang, you must rise above the fray, create a collective that opposes lying/cheating. See by eliminating this perceived evil, light cannot shine as bright.
In EvE not all groups create the same reputations for themselves the same. Some created glorified communist utopian everyone is equal, and people that play in those groups have fun like in no other game when they eliminate a fascist cooperation.
If everyone played like you honorable, and everyone was 100 the same life would be boring |
Blapathon Tanker
Grief University
23
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 01:13:00 -
[54] - Quote
Vrain Matari wrote:What is the metagame? It comes down to this:
The very best of us, the true generals and leaders, may very well be able to dominate Planetary Conquest with a bare minimum of fighting.
The opposite of the metagame is the meatgame.
They're both neccesary, but one is ultimately lose and the other is ultimately win.
the last metagame you clowns tried to play ended with your candidate for CSM being shamed off the list. Is your metagame perhaps "We require our people to be good guys while not caring if they prove us hypocrites?"
In other news, grief University will begin open, anonymous recruiting of alts to help you, our consumers have access to our services with full deniability.
Our only requirement will be that you actively contribute to discerning which mechanics can be used to enter into ruining peoples' Planetary conquest for profit and fun.
Mostly fun. |
Selinate deux
DUST University Ivy League
69
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 01:15:00 -
[55] - Quote
Are people really that desperate to infiltrate that they're using alternate PSN accounts?
Otherwise, you can just check the PSN ID for known griefers. Just make a list of them somewhere, share them with others, and keep it up to date. |
Mithridates VI
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
1561
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 01:20:00 -
[56] - Quote
Selinate deux wrote:Are people really that desperate to infiltrate that they're using alternate PSN accounts?
Otherwise, you can just check the PSN ID for known griefers. Just make a list of them somewhere, share them with others, and keep it up to date.
You do realise that an alternate PSN takes very little effort, right? |
Vallud Eadesso
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 01:25:00 -
[57] - Quote
Tuna the Fish wrote:It seems to me that "playing the metagame" is just glorified/encouraged griefing. Congratulations, you and your buddies hijacked someone else's match and teamkilled them till they lost. The only difference between griefing in dust and griefing in other games is that in dust people will pay you for it.
But that's not the point of this topic. The question I pose to you: Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame, or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new?
People throw the term "Metagaming" around without actually understanding what it means. Metagaming is the act of 'gaming the game' and it was originally a military and political term. An example of gaming the game would be, for example, using low cost fits effectively to the point of economic victory, or forcing economic returns to you and your pocket even through sustained loss (See: Goonswarm in EVE with Hulkageddon.) This would be done by~ lets say, when Null Wars are added, I force an invasion of my space where I control the market. I add a huge markup to the value of all items in my region and then choke the attackers supply lines. I then make sure they get JUST enough victories to hang around and profit hugely from their continues war 'against' me and my forced. Until i've made enough to fun my own war effort and force them out. Goonswarm have been doing this for years. This is meta gaming.
Metagaming could also describe the act of crazy dropsuit fits like the good old heavy-sniper build that showed up a while ago. Essentially, Metagaming is using rules outside of the game to effect or bend, but never break, the rules inside the game. What betamax and the rest did is NOT metagaming, it is 'exploiting' a loophole in the rules. A loophole that will likely be closed or addressed.
So yeah. That was a bit of a ramble. |
Selinate deux
DUST University Ivy League
69
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 01:26:00 -
[58] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Selinate deux wrote:Are people really that desperate to infiltrate that they're using alternate PSN accounts?
Otherwise, you can just check the PSN ID for known griefers. Just make a list of them somewhere, share them with others, and keep it up to date. You do realise that an alternate PSN takes very little effort, right?
No, I've never been inclined to make another one, nor do I see enough value in it to do it just to screw over other corps in one game. |
Mithridates VI
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
1561
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 01:28:00 -
[59] - Quote
Selinate deux wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Selinate deux wrote:Are people really that desperate to infiltrate that they're using alternate PSN accounts?
Otherwise, you can just check the PSN ID for known griefers. Just make a list of them somewhere, share them with others, and keep it up to date. You do realise that an alternate PSN takes very little effort, right? No, I've never been inclined to make another one, nor do I see enough value in it to do it just to screw over other corps in one game.
It takes about five minutes and lets your alts gain passive SP. Not quite a move of desperation. |
Selinate deux
DUST University Ivy League
69
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 01:32:00 -
[60] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Selinate deux wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Selinate deux wrote:Are people really that desperate to infiltrate that they're using alternate PSN accounts?
Otherwise, you can just check the PSN ID for known griefers. Just make a list of them somewhere, share them with others, and keep it up to date. You do realise that an alternate PSN takes very little effort, right? No, I've never been inclined to make another one, nor do I see enough value in it to do it just to screw over other corps in one game. It takes about five minutes and lets your alts gain passive SP. Not quite a move of desperation.
If this is the case, then CCP needs to act on it. Character recycling in Eve is against the rules/EULA/whatever, I believe. I don't see why it shouldn't be in Dust, also. |
|
Blapathon Tanker
Grief University
26
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 07:12:00 -
[61] - Quote
Selinate deux wrote:
If this is the case, then CCP needs to act on it. Character recycling in Eve is against the rules/EULA/whatever, I believe. I don't see why it shouldn't be in Dust, also.
because most people use passive SP alts to allow them to join alternative play styles.
Also because making alt accounts to bypass PSN names and API is a time honored tradition in the community.
the rule against recycling alts is to prevent people from making an alt, massacring people, biomassing the character, making a new character with new name and clean rapsheet then doing it again... and again without consequence.'
There are no name change services in New Eden, so if you want to start over you have to slag your character completely or abandon the account. but if you start griefing again with the new character you have hit the CCP exploit line.
I intend to not biomass my character because it's too fun to recruit in legitimate corp recruitment channels. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |