Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tuna the Fish
Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
It seems to me that "playing the metagame" is just glorified/encouraged griefing. Congratulations, you and your buddies hijacked someone else's match and teamkilled them till they lost. The only difference between griefing in dust and griefing in other games is that in dust people will pay you for it.
But that's not the point of this topic. The question I pose to you: Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame, or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new? |
Daedric Lothar
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
384
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Oh look, another OMG SPIES thread. |
Kira Lannister
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
904
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
Protip: If you sabotage do it right. Not like Beta...ehem...failmax :] |
Banned From Forums
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
65
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tuna the Fish wrote:It seems to me that "playing the metagame" is just glorified/encouraged griefing. Congratulations, you and your buddies hijacked someone else's match and teamkilled them till they lost. The only difference between griefing in dust and griefing in other games is that in dust people will pay you for it.
But that's not the point of this topic. The question I pose to you: Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame, or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new?
Meta gaming: The act of using fail tactics to get the better of someone just because you suck!
|
Banned From Forums
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
65
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:Protip: If you sabotage do it right. Not like Beta...ehem...failmax :]
Meta gaming with Betamax is still in its Beta stage. It will be out SoonGäó! |
dent 308
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1386
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:02:00 -
[6] - Quote
Playing the meta game is as much about friends as it is about making enemies. |
Tuna the Fish
Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:04:00 -
[7] - Quote
Daedric Lothar wrote:Oh look, another OMG SPIES thread.
Not quite. Try re-reading the second paragraph.
Anyone care to give an on-topic reply?
Edit: Thank you, dent 308. Anyone else? |
Dust HaHakoke
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
well other then greifing there is moral part of the metagame is making your corp look good and the other guys bad. You can slander the other guy question his leadership or you can make quailty of life improvements to a corp gaining better players simply cause your corp seems the best option for whatever reason.
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
479
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
Tuna the Fish wrote:It seems to me that "playing the metagame" is just glorified/encouraged griefing. Congratulations, you and your buddies hijacked someone else's match and teamkilled them till they lost. The only difference between griefing in dust and griefing in other games is that in dust people will pay you for it.
But that's not the point of this topic. The question I pose to you: Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame, or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new?
Meta gaming in New Eden generally requires an intricate knowledge of most dramas going on at any one moment, so it will always exclude new players. Developing trusted allies is still meta gaming IMO. If you sell your services as a merc, you can establish a good rep with the corps, and managing that rep when you inevitably get hired against previous employers could be quite a challenge. Especially having seen the tantrums thrown in the war room by certain corps. |
Baracka Flocka Flame
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
355
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
Meta gaming isn't all about greifing and harassing, your just witnessing what happens when kids think they are meta gaming by bringing in a spy to disrupt 1 little battle in a war for some lulz. I wouldnt consider that meta gaming at all, just kids being kids and using a mechanic to their advantage at the moment.
Like the posts above me say meta gaming is lots of things. As a new player, ya you wouldnt really be involved in this. |
|
Tuna the Fish
Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:13:00 -
[11] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Tuna the Fish wrote:It seems to me that "playing the metagame" is just glorified/encouraged griefing. Congratulations, you and your buddies hijacked someone else's match and teamkilled them till they lost. The only difference between griefing in dust and griefing in other games is that in dust people will pay you for it.
But that's not the point of this topic. The question I pose to you: Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame, or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new? Meta gaming in New Eden generally requires an intricate knowledge of most dramas going on at any one moment, so it will always exclude new players. Developing trusted allies is still meta gaming IMO. If you sell your services as a merc, you can establish a good rep with the corps, and managing that rep when you inevitably get hired against previous employers could be quite a challenge. Especially having seen the tantrums thrown in the war room by certain corps.
I'm not to worried about being excluded at this point since I am so new. What I was concerned with is that my only options seemed to be either grief or be griefed. However, the idea of building a reputation as a merc does sound appealing. |
Dust HaHakoke
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:16:00 -
[12] - Quote
iI once ran part of a corp in eve online its not exactly easy my job was more or less to help to decide in corp ideas and rules. Well that and to explain to the new guys what the corp expects where it is going how were going to get there etc. never liked the job but it was MY job |
Natu Nobilis
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
295
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:18:00 -
[13] - Quote
Tuna the Fish wrote:It seems to me that "playing the metagame" is just glorified/encouraged griefing. Congratulations, you and your buddies hijacked someone else's match and teamkilled them till they lost. The only difference between griefing in dust and griefing in other games is that in dust people will pay you for it.
But that's not the point of this topic. The question I pose to you: Is there any way to fully enjoy the metagame without griefing? If I don't care to lie, steal, cheat. or backstab, can I still enjoy the metagame, or is all I can look forward to being mistrusted by any corporation I join simply because I'm new?
We play a console game. It has certain rules and mechanics. I can pick weapons, vehicles, skills, and use them to accomplish certain objectives written in the rules. (Remove all opponent clones or destroy the MCC). That-¦s the game.
The metagame can be all the things you do outside this mechanic, or using it in non-conventional ways. It can be elaborated, or simple, but it-¦s a game within the game.
Examples:
- You infiltrate a group so you can have access to their information, and pass it to third parties, be it for fun, intel gathering, or profit.
- You can infiltrate a group so you can gather power within the ranks and use this power in was that are harmful to this group, benefic to other groups, or both of them. It doesn-¦t matter the timeframe of the infiltration, you can go for a soldier that doesn-¦t fight in a battle or pretends that he-¦s a bad player, a squad leader that invites unexpected people to important battles, a Field Commander that deliberately uses corporations assets in ways that are harmful to the corporation, an accountant that empties the corporation wallet, a director that removes all money, assets and players, taking the name of the corporation / alliance hostage and ultimately ripping a form of identity from the group.
- You can use the forums / blogs / news to make propaganda and psyops that may result in the target losing members, making moves that didn-¦t got proper planning, losing allies due to uncovered / fake information, or simply to manipulate the players and the market in a way that is benefitial for you, making everyone sell/buy a specific item/service.
- You can create a persona that shows up on the news, writes articles for game sites, have their own game site, got removed from the CSM for telling people to commit suicide, and be a famous internet person.
- You can create a real service and make real money with apps and services related to the game, and even commit the illegality of RTM for a time before being permabanned by CCP.
You can do a lot of things. Filling a squad with hostile combatants is nothing. If people get stressed over this, then the future is going to be a pleasure.
Think outside the box. Having good reflexes in a protosuit with a good weapon is not the only thing that counts in this world.
|
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2167
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:19:00 -
[14] - Quote
I have to agree. Meta gaming exists in almost every game. Simply being here on the forums, getting info on bug/glitches/fits ect is meta gaming.
The EvE community however, seems to feel griefing is meta gaming, and CCP back them. Which is total BS imho. I think this is an issue which will continue to plague CCPs games.
I will not defend saboteurs or griefers however, the enemy of my enemy... |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
2377
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:25:00 -
[15] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:I have to agree. Meta gaming exists in almost every game. Simply being here on the forums, getting info on bug/glitches/fits ect is meta gaming.
The EvE community however, seems to feel griefing is meta gaming, and CCP back them. Which is total BS imho. I think this is an issue which will continue to plague CCPs games.
I will not defend saboteurs or griefers however, the enemy of my enemy...
If griefing as a meta game is a problem for CCP, how do you explain the success of Eve? |
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet
875
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:29:00 -
[16] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:
I will not defend saboteurs or griefers however, the enemy of my enemy...
is my enemy's enemy.
And how dare you besmirch the name of your King.
mittani is King of Space and he bent over backwards to repent his one sin ever. Lesser minds cannot comprehend this magnanimity and seek to bring yet more shame to his name.
Also the metagame makes this bad game good.
I approve of this AWOXING service and intend to utilize it to the fullest extent possible...
After I start caring about planetary Conquest. |
RKKR
The Southern Legion RISE of LEGION
26
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:33:00 -
[17] - Quote
Excuse me for my post but I couldn't help myself.
Daedric Lothar wrote:Oh look, another OMG SPIES thread.
Aren't you supposed to link to your own thread now? But wait this thread isn't about OMG Spies so you can't...
|
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2167
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:35:00 -
[18] - Quote
@maken nOOb corps, hi sec, concord & gate guns. Griefing exists in many games. Diablo ii HC was the best/worst. Damn hydra sorcs & their TPs.
@Breakin I think you'll find someone like mittens has more than a single sin to his soul. To become king often requires great sacrifice. Winter is comming and all that jazz. |
Natu Nobilis
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
295
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:43:00 -
[19] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:I have to agree. Meta gaming exists in almost every game. Simply being here on the forums, getting info on bug/glitches/fits ect is meta gaming.
The EvE community however, seems to feel griefing is meta gaming, and CCP back them. Which is total BS imho. I think this is an issue which will continue to plague CCPs games.
I will not defend saboteurs or griefers however, the enemy of my enemy...
CCP doesn-¦t endorse griefing. They have sandobx games that have emergent gameplay.
That being said, if you thing that you-¦re being harassed or you can-¦t play the game because of someone (he bumps you out of your minning position and it doesn-¦t matter how many systems you jump, he follows you and you can-¦t play for example), you-¦re welcome to file a petition. Harass and griefing is no good.
What people call griefing however, is another story.
Soon we-¦ll have people calling "Oh, but he killed me 20 times with his protosuit, while i only have STD" griefing. |
Lord Kira DeAurum
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:00:00 -
[20] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote:Tony Calif wrote:I have to agree. Meta gaming exists in almost every game. Simply being here on the forums, getting info on bug/glitches/fits ect is meta gaming.
The EvE community however, seems to feel griefing is meta gaming, and CCP back them. Which is total BS imho. I think this is an issue which will continue to plague CCPs games.
I will not defend saboteurs or griefers however, the enemy of my enemy... CCP doesn-¦t endorse griefing. They have sandobx games that have emergent gameplay. That being said, if you thing that you-¦re being harassed or you can-¦t play the game because of someone (he bumps you out of your minning position and it doesn-¦t matter how many systems you jump, he follows you and you can-¦t play for example), you-¦re welcome to file a petition. Harass and griefing is no good. What people call griefing however, is another story. Soon we-¦ll have people calling "Oh, but he killed me 20 times with his protosuit, while i only have STD" griefing.
Failmax needs grief counseling after their failed atempt at griefing.
Getting griefed while they grief? GRIEFCEPTION
|
|
Tuna the Fish
Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:07:00 -
[21] - Quote
Lord Kira DeAurum wrote:Natu Nobilis wrote:Tony Calif wrote:I have to agree. Meta gaming exists in almost every game. Simply being here on the forums, getting info on bug/glitches/fits ect is meta gaming.
The EvE community however, seems to feel griefing is meta gaming, and CCP back them. Which is total BS imho. I think this is an issue which will continue to plague CCPs games.
I will not defend saboteurs or griefers however, the enemy of my enemy... CCP doesn-¦t endorse griefing. They have sandobx games that have emergent gameplay. That being said, if you thing that you-¦re being harassed or you can-¦t play the game because of someone (he bumps you out of your minning position and it doesn-¦t matter how many systems you jump, he follows you and you can-¦t play for example), you-¦re welcome to file a petition. Harass and griefing is no good. What people call griefing however, is another story. Soon we-¦ll have people calling "Oh, but he killed me 20 times with his protosuit, while i only have STD" griefing. Failmax needs grief counseling after their failed atempt at griefing. Getting griefed while they grief? GRIEFCEPTION
Yo Dawg, I herd you like griefing, so I put some grief in your grief so you can grieve while you grief. |
Skyhound Solbrave
Rough Riders..
97
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:13:00 -
[22] - Quote
Eve is famous for the backstabbings, infiltrations, and robbings that go on in their corporations. Crashing a PC battle and TKing is pretty much militia-level metagaming if you ask me.
Though now the major corps have caught on that this is in fact, Eve-on-the-ground and will learn to prevent such things from happening. Usually they will use holding or auxillary corps for new members to join and they can prove their skills and trustworthiness through their actions in these scrub corps and will be filtered through to the main corp. True spies and saboteurs go through the entire process, making an entirely new character and persona that can be just as hardcore as any of us. They make friends within the corp, help them with their life problems, become true bros, until BAM! the moment to strike. It'll be when they make Director of the main corp or in charge of a particularly important match. They will burn the house down and never be heard from again.
|
Lord Kira DeAurum
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:16:00 -
[23] - Quote
So if crashing a pc battle is militia grade metagaming, and failmax failed at that...
That means they achieved Failing Proficiency Lvl. 5 |
Succendo
Goonfeet
11
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:21:00 -
[24] - Quote
Wars aren't won by boots on the ground. Wars are won via logistics, morale, and intel.
Sorry that you are so resistant to such a basic strategy lesson. |
Natu Nobilis
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
296
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:24:00 -
[25] - Quote
Succendo wrote:Wars aren't won by boots on the ground. Wars are won via logistics, morale, and intel.
Sorry that you are so resistant to such a basic strategy lesson.
Do we introduce them to Sun Tzu? |
lllIIIlI IIIlIl
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
36
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:34:00 -
[26] - Quote
The only thing the metagame does in dust is provide an excuse when someone acts like a spastic or a justification for why the core FPS mechanics are so bad. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
3128
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:37:00 -
[27] - Quote
The mentality behind using tactics unintended by CCP (mechanical oversights) as "legitimate tactics" is troubling.
When Immobile Infantry handled the finding of infinite Precision Strikes primarily inhouse and out of actual matches, instead of abusing it in game for their benefit, I ultimately thought that was very cool and "professional" of them. They tested it, duplicated it, and reported it, all off the grid so no one was abusing it.
Yet, CCPs OWN ELECT happily and freely use these loopholes and tag them as "legitimate tactics".
Of course you can sit there and say "oh we're trying to fix it and talk to CCP about it" but the fact that it's readily and casually used in the gaming environment....yea, it just doesn't sit right with me. |
Natu Nobilis
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
296
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:45:00 -
[28] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:The mentality behind using tactics unintended by CCP (mechanical oversights) as "legitimate tactics" is troubling.
When Immobile Infantry handled the finding of infinite Precision Strikes primarily inhouse and out of actual matches, instead of abusing it in game for their benefit, I ultimately thought that was very cool and "professional" of them. They tested it, duplicated it, and reported it, all off the grid so no one was abusing it.
Yet, CCPs OWN ELECT happily and freely use these loopholes and tag them as "legitimate tactics".
Of course you can sit there and say "oh we're trying to fix it and talk to CCP about it" but the fact that it's readily and casually used in the gaming environment....yea, it just doesn't sit right with me.
OB to be used, needs every X ammount of WP. That-¦s the mechanic.
If i find out that i can go X, -50, X, -50, that-¦s a bug. If people use the bug for personal gain, that-¦s an exploit.
**
I-¦m a squad leader, therefore, i invite people to squads. That-¦s the mechanic.
I find out that i can invite hostiles to a battle. That-¦s NOT an exploit.
If the difference between each case is not clear, it-¦s going to be very complicated to talk about emergent gameplay, or a game where "shoot shoot, kill kill, i killed most therefore i win" is not the plan. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
3129
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:50:00 -
[29] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:The mentality behind using tactics unintended by CCP (mechanical oversights) as "legitimate tactics" is troubling.
When Immobile Infantry handled the finding of infinite Precision Strikes primarily inhouse and out of actual matches, instead of abusing it in game for their benefit, I ultimately thought that was very cool and "professional" of them. They tested it, duplicated it, and reported it, all off the grid so no one was abusing it.
Yet, CCPs OWN ELECT happily and freely use these loopholes and tag them as "legitimate tactics".
Of course you can sit there and say "oh we're trying to fix it and talk to CCP about it" but the fact that it's readily and casually used in the gaming environment....yea, it just doesn't sit right with me. OB to be used, needs every X ammount of WP. That-¦s the mechanic. If i find out that i can go X, -50, X, -50, that-¦s a bug. If people use the bug for personal gain, that-¦s an exploit. ** I-¦m a squad leader, therefore, i invite people to squads. That-¦s the mechanic. I find out that i can invite hostiles to a battle. That-¦s NOT an exploit. If the difference between each case is not clear, it-¦s going to be very complicated to talk about emergent gameplay, or a game where "shoot shoot, kill kill, i killed most therefore i win" is not the plan.
Yet the simple lack of a mechanic as simple as roles or being able to remove people from combat has caused corporations to have to splinter off and go through silly loopholes and be hyper paranoid of every single applicant, because they have no control over what happens if someone goes rogue, because battle commanders forget how to cut clones off from the clone vat.
The second you're on the field, any clone vat will do. Why we don't just spawn on our enemies CRUs is beyond me
You would think that a member of CPM, CCPs own elected official, would take that information straight to CCP and try to hammer out an option BEFORE it came to light.
Emergent gameplay is one thing. That's cool and important. Finding a loophole and abusing it for your own gain at the expense of others is childish and bad form for a community representative.
The fact that this wasn't addressed before it came to light is the real issue at hand.
|
Natu Nobilis
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
297
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 20:59:00 -
[30] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Yet the simple lack of a mechanic as simple as roles or being able to remove people from combat has caused corporations to have to splinter off and go through silly loopholes and be hyper paranoid of every single applicant, because they have no control over what happens if someone goes rogue, because battle commanders forget how to cut clones off from the clone vat. The second you're on the field, any clone vat will do. Why we don't just spawn on our enemies CRUs is beyond me You would think that a member of CPM, CCPs own elected official, would take that information straight to CCP and try to hammer out an option BEFORE it came to light. Emergent gameplay is one thing. That's cool and important. Finding a loophole and abusing it for your own gain at the expense of others is childish and bad form for a community representative. The fact that this wasn't addressed before it came to light is the real issue at hand.
I-¦m in favor of more mechanics like roles and proper command structure, so the RTS side can be improved. That being said.
1 - Even with a lot of roles in EVE, people still use Holding corporations for alliances. (Smart one at least) 2 - Being paranoid about applicants should be a must, regardless of roles no? 3 - How can they take to CCP a long known mechanic that should be refined, i agree, but is not "broken" (incomplete i would say) 4 - How is this a loophole, or an abuse? 5 - It was adressed before
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |