Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Abu Stij
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
183
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 13:54:00 -
[61] - Quote
Not bumping. |
Judge Rhadamanthus
Kapow Heavy Industries
150
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 14:23:00 -
[62] - Quote
But where is the balance? I call my DS in and chose a stupid spot. You kill me and keep 1.3 million of assets. How do I as a DS pilot make 1.3 million in ISK or assets from you?
I can't steal your guns or suits. Letting you keep it lets you gain something from a match in a way I cannot. That is not fair. If you can steal my stuff, I need to be able to steal yours. Otherwise we have a situation where those making high risk investments can be robbed by those who are taking no such risk.
How about if i get close enough to hold O on you you get knocked out and I get your suit? Fair? |
Shadow Archeus
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
90
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 14:30:00 -
[63] - Quote
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote:But where is the balance? I call my DS in and chose a stupid spot. You kill me and keep 1.3 million of assets. How do I as a DS pilot make 1.3 million in ISK or assets from you?
I can't steal your guns or suits. Letting you keep it lets you gain something from a match in a way I cannot. That is not fair. If you can steal my stuff, I need to be able to steal yours. Otherwise we have a situation where those making high risk investments can be robbed by those who are taking no such risk.
How about if i get close enough to hold O on you you get knocked out and I get your suit? Fair?
The fact that you even said chose a stupid spot.....ergo its not my problem.....pick a better spot......its fair whether u think it is or not |
Judge Rhadamanthus
Kapow Heavy Industries
150
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 14:41:00 -
[64] - Quote
Shadow Archeus wrote:The fact that you even said chose a stupid spot.....ergo its not my problem.....pick a better spot......its fair whether u think it is or not
Well done for avoiding the content of my post and focusing on a totally irrelevant point. Making an assertion that it's fair without justification is useless. Saying it is fair weather i think so or not is a somewhat weak argument. I can simply reply by saying it is not fair. Now where do we go. Justify your response or be ignored.
Ill try help you. Lets say its a great spot, but i disconnect, or it drops on me, or i get pushed far from it by a friendly lav..It makes no difference. You as infantry have a way to make millions of ISK. The Pilot does not.
Explain how it is fair that in a match we can both :
Kill Get War Points Get Skill Points Earn ISK from battle payments
But only you can stay in role and steal millions from me. I'm waiting. |
Abu Stij
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
186
|
Posted - 2013.06.11 18:01:00 -
[65] - Quote
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote:
Well done for avoiding the content of my post and focusing on a totally irrelevant point. Making an assertion that it's fair without justification is useless. Saying it is fair weather i think so or not is a somewhat weak argument. I can simply reply by saying it is not fair. Now where do we go. Justify your response or be ignored.
Ill try help you. Lets say its a great spot, but i disconnect, or it drops on me, or i get pushed far from it by a friendly lav..It makes no difference. You as infantry have a way to make millions of ISK. The Pilot does not.
Explain how it is fair that in a match we can both :
Kill Get War Points Get Skill Points Earn ISK from battle payments
But only you can stay in role and steal millions from me. I'm waiting.
It is fair, because you chose a poor spot to deploy from. Its a punishment for you making a bad decision in the match. In the current scenario, you don't get punished and the "thief" doesn't get any reward for keeping the dropship alive nor using your dropship during the battle other than a short term gain, which even then is easily stoppable through competent anti-vehicle dropsuit fittings.
You can, obviously, try stealing it back or steal something else or have one of your allies do the same thing the opponent just did to you.
The dropsuit/weapon loot option you mentioned is also a viable way to balance things out, and you actually do get that loot in a Planetary Conquest match so that point is moot if you're trying to make it seem like its not at all in place right now.
So in summary:
1) Take responsibility for your actions/decisions in the match 2) Coordinate with your team to take back your dropship or take something from the other team 3) Stop complaining you don't get loot when you do in PC matches, and ask that CCP implement better loot drops in all match types if you avoid PC matches.
The fact you are demanding someone make an assertion that something is "fair" when you opened your statement with "what if I chose a dumb spot?" is hilarious. This is New Eden, and if you haven't noticed or heard, but "fairness" is what the losing side harps about when they make a stupid decision. When CCP makes it so the fault of the end result is on the one who made the poor decision, its a fair thing as there is no one to blame but the person who chose to do the wrong thing. Don't blame the thief if you leave your car unlocked and with the key in the ignition. |
Judge Rhadamanthus
Kapow Heavy Industries
150
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 09:09:00 -
[66] - Quote
That a long reply where you missed the point. Ill try make this simple
1) We both die 5 times. Loot is handed out as part of loot table at the end of the match - Both of us share this method. Our suits and equipment are added to the loot table. Balance (well sort of. In a vehicle i lose a suit and a vehicle)
2) I die calling in a drop ship. How is totally irrelevant. Please try to get that. i lose my suit and you, because you were close can personally take my vehicle. it does NOT go into the loot pool for the team. - You gain from me and above your team millions of ISK.
Now is there a way for a tank/HAV/DS pilot to remove loot from the loot table and take it personally while playing his role? No. This is the imbalance. You are asking for a way to make more ISK in a match than I can just because you are infantry. That is imbalanced. That is the unfairness.
Now please stop with this childish truism about new eden being unfair. If your an adult you should know that this isn't new eden, this is a game on Earth. It is a profit generating medium targeted at the media market. It is a product that sells for real money things like tanks to people. If you do that you need to watch your product carefully to avoid breaking the law.
If i can have a AUR DS taken from me then the game needs to allow me to do the same to others. And not just their DS or Tank but whatever they have bought to the fight in the same manner they can take my stuff. In this case hacking it after their death.
Abu Stij wrote:Don't blame the thief if you leave your car unlocked and with the key in the ignition.
Also did you seriously write that while sober? What a ignorant thing to write. I guess if you wear a short dress and get drunk you cant blame the rapist, or the burglar for coming into your house on a warm night if you sleep with the window open. You see it all the time do you? You vulgar synonym for the human vulva |
Abu Stij
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
188
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 15:01:00 -
[67] - Quote
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote:That a long reply where you missed the point. Ill try make this simple 1) We both die 5 times. Loot is handed out as part of loot table at the end of the match - Both of us share this method. Our suits and equipment are added to the loot table. Balance (well sort of. In a vehicle i lose a suit and a vehicle) 2) I die calling in a drop ship. How is totally irrelevant. Please try to get that. i lose my suit and you, because you were close can personally take my vehicle. it does NOT go into the loot pool for the team. - You gain from me and above your team millions of ISK. Now is there a way for a tank/HAV/DS pilot to remove loot from the loot table and take it personally while playing his role? No. This is the imbalance. You are asking for a way to make more ISK in a match than I can just because you are infantry. That is imbalanced. That is the unfairness. Now please stop with this childish truism about new eden being unfair. If your an adult you should know that this isn't new eden, this is a game on Earth. It is a profit generating medium targeted at the media market. It is a product that sells for real money things like tanks to people. If you do that you need to watch your product carefully to avoid breaking the law. If i can have a AUR DS taken from me then the game needs to allow me to do the same to others. And not just their DS or Tank but whatever they have bought to the fight in the same manner they can take my stuff. In this case hacking it after their death. Abu Stij wrote:Don't blame the thief if you leave your car unlocked and with the key in the ignition. Also did you seriously write that while sober? What a ignorant thing to write. I guess if you wear a short dress and get drunk you cant blame the rapist, or the burglar for coming into your house on a warm night if you sleep with the window open. You see it all the time do you? You vulgar synonym for the human vulva
1) No, that is balance because both people lost something. Just because you're a pilot and someone else is a soldier doesn't mean the soldier has to lose more just to match your loss of a vehicle you willingly put out into the field.
2) It shouldn't go into the loot pool for the team because the individual was able to hack the device, and recall it to his own cargo hold. I'm not sure where you got the idea that the team gains the millions of ISK but sure, if you lost something why can't someone else get anything from it?
Actually there is, it's this nifty concept that you, as a pilot, have your team help you steal another vehicle on the map and take it for yourself. I'm not sure how you can't comprehend that as a strategy or plan or if you are being willfully obstinate but that is a fully capable thing you can do in any class across the game. There is no "pilots can't ever hack" mechanic in the game nor should there ever be.
If you're willing to put out your expensive ship with the knowledge that you can lose it, don't cry foul when someone takes it from you. You're basically asking for permanent protection of your items from your own mistakes with no way for the other party to gain anything outside of a handful of war-points for destroying something expensive.
The ad hominem about "you're being a child" is silly. The game takes place in New Eden. We're talking about that aspect, not what the medium is being used to enter that "world". The fact you're trying to apply that destroying or "stealing" someone's tank in a battle because they bought it with real money is potentially illegal is laughable and you're ignorance to laws is apparent. The game clearly states "you can lose your items" and that should apply to your tanks. Let's compare a game where you actually pay to play it that uses a similar mechanic and is also by CCP Games, EVE Online. In EVE people can ransom each other for the digital goods of a space ship you bought with digital money you converted with real money (via PLEX), there doesn't seem to be anyone claiming legal fault on CCP for allowing that to happen. They also have a pretty solid legal team at CCP and have to deal with a multitude of different country's laws and regulations to make their product available in as many places as possible.
Regarding to your accusation that I was supporting rapists by saying "Don't blame the thief if you leave your car unlocked with the key in the ignition"; Holy Christ you can't be that desperately grasping at straws can you? One is an inanimate object left unprotected, the other is assaulting a person because of the clothing they wore. Are you that dense or are you just trying to be? A person being violated is not the same as an object being taken, the fact you're trying to compare the two is hilarious.
Also thank's the for attempt to skirt around the rules, but be an adult and leave the name calling at home. |
Richard Hansaw
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.16 06:18:00 -
[68] - Quote
+1 |
PizztOleMan
Axis of Chaos
5
|
Posted - 2013.06.16 06:51:00 -
[69] - Quote
ive had these exact convo's with my friends... OP 100% support as long as its a true copy... un changeable and fully 'usable' (skill free) |
Richard Hansaw
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.16 07:02:00 -
[70] - Quote
I know I've already +1'd this, but I'd like to add that this would be a real nice addition, along with WP for "Vehicle Hack" and "Vehicle Capture" because it gives an incentive to vehicle hacking, otherwise you just shoot them for WP. |
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE SPADES EoN.
28
|
Posted - 2013.06.16 07:46:00 -
[71] - Quote
Abu Stij wrote:During several games last evening myself and several other members of the DUST 514 community were all talking about hacking vehicles in a battle.
Currently when you hack an enemy vehicle you simply are granted friendly access to the LAV/HAV or Dropship for however long it takes you to run it off a cliff and blow it up Gumball Rally style.
The assumption was made that if you hacked the vehicle, you could keep it in your assets as you effectively "stole" it from your enemy, much like scamming or more specifically looting occurs in EVE Online.
CCP and fellow DUST players, I propose a change to the current system in which if/when you hack someones vehicle you can recall it and save the vehicle for future deployment either in that battle, or in whatever battle you wish in the future. This vehicle would and should be represented in your post match "Salvage" section, on top of any other salvage you might have received during that match.
This game mechanic is both a way to curb people from spawning tons of vehicles in a match, as well as provide those who hack the vehicle a reward for their effort.
I have brought this up to a CPM0 member and he is in support of it, and I hope both CCP and the DUST community would consider this proposal a good way to curb the mass vehicle spawning and provide people more incentives to work in the "Hacking" side of things for their respective armies.
unfortunately,CCP will most likely some how manage to do the exact opposite of what we want... like they always do. |
Sibri Vannikh
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.16 08:00:00 -
[72] - Quote
CCP Blam! wrote:This is a great thread. Let me provide some background.
We have discussed allowing players to directly salvage items - not just for vehicles, on the battlefield. I really like the proposal for the vehicle salvage, where hacked vehicles can be recalled into the hacker's inventory. To do this however, we would have to resolve a couple of technical issues:
1. Rather than making a vehicle usable by a particular team/individual after being hacked, enforce the concept of a new "owner" of the vehicle, so that the vehicle knows where to go to when being recalled.
2. Each blueprint and corresponding item would need to be linked. It wouldn't be feasible (or make much sense) to allow players who have hacked a vehicle that is a blueprint or has blueprints on it to inherit that blueprint. Rather, we would want a recall to place a blueprint's corresponding consumable item in the player's inventory.
This isn't a gargantuan task, but it's not something we can quickly deploy as part of a hotfix.
Thanks for the feedback guys, I will see what I can do. What about saving the vehicle as a whole in the hackers inventory instead of saving each item and he could not change the fitting of the vehicle. Same could apply for recalling own vehicles. If you know how to weld you will know that it needs alot of work to un-weld something. Also it would not be as rugged anymore so it would be better to just leave it as it is. |
ARF 1049
The Phoenix Federation
27
|
Posted - 2013.06.16 08:04:00 -
[73] - Quote
yeah great idea just have it show up in your inventory as hacked-whatever vehicle. you can't edit it or anything only deploy it and it can't be recalled it has to survive the match |
Abu Stij
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
191
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 12:49:00 -
[74] - Quote
PizztOleMan wrote:ive had these exact convo's with my friends... OP 100% support as long as its a true copy... un changeable and fully 'usable' (skill free)
Making it unchangeable is a grey area as in EVE when you take someone's ship in a heist or scam, you can still change the fitting. What would be better is locking the vehicle from being changed while in battle, so that you can only alter it while in your Mercenary Quarters, which is the only way to actually change fittings in EVE. I would prefer that system over making it so that I can never change a stolen vehicles fitting.
I also think making it so that even if you don't have the skills, you can still call it into a battle makes the need for LAV, HAV or Dropship skills completely useless which isn't at all helpful. If you don't have the skills, you can't use it.
Referencing EVE again, I can scam someone out of a Tengu even if I can't fly it. I still own it, I just can't use it until I'm skilled in the required areas. Selling it/contracting it to my corp/alliance however, is entirely possible and a useful avenue for income so that should be applicable to this. |
Saucy Butt Love
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
18
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 20:42:00 -
[75] - Quote
Thanks for the feedback guys, I will see what I can do.[/quote]What if:
1. Enemy infantry gonna hack my HAV. 2. My teammates gonna kill that guy before he manage to recall it. 3. My teammates gonna hack "my" HAV and try to recall it(?)
Whose property will be HAV in that scenario?
My teammates can not simply recall my HAV. And what if 3 guys is hacking enemy vehicle, who of them will be able to recall it?[/quote]
Wow your English is atrocious.
1. Enemy infantry hack 'my' HAV 2. My team mate kills the enemy after the hack but before he recalls it 3. My team mate hacks the enemy tank and recalls it.
Whose property is the HAV in that scenario? My team mates cannot simply recall my HAV, and what if 3 guys are hacking the enemy vehicle, who of them will be able to recall it?
Well in answer to you question after making it easier to read and understand.
Unfortunately the tank would be your team mates, however maybe there can be a 'gift back' command where if this happens you can gift the item back to the original owner and be rewarded 1000isk or 100wp.
The answer to your second question (3 guys hacking at once) is simple, whoever started hacking first. In the rare scenario where they hack at the same time then they can do all sorts of things from dual after the game or bid for it. |
Defy Gravity
Silver Talon Corporation
55
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 21:10:00 -
[76] - Quote
I support this fully! |
Dimitri Rascolovitch
The Immortal Knights
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 19:49:00 -
[77] - Quote
There are so many times where i have hacked peoples indestructo-LLAVS, HAVs and dropships, and become saddened because i couldnt recall it |
Abu Stij
Leessang.
236
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 21:50:00 -
[78] - Quote
Is it possible to get an update on this concept? |
The-Errorist
319
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 20:43:00 -
[79] - Quote
Still would like. |
Kallas Hallytyr
Skullbreakers
45
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 21:22:00 -
[80] - Quote
There needs to be a new module: the booby trap. Potentially such that a proto-level mod that can destroy other assets in a player's inventory! :D
Let the griefing commence! |
|
General Erick
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
166
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 00:57:00 -
[81] - Quote
CCP Blam! wrote:A little tack-on here - it goes without saying that going this route would mean that you wouldn't be able to call in your salvage if you don't have the skills for it. It would work just as any other item you have in your inventory. Awww man, you just killed my buzz
Fatbros for life! Stand against the oppression that is AR, and fight!
|
SponkSponkSponk
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
455
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 03:24:00 -
[82] - Quote
Abu Stij wrote:Is it possible to get an update on this concept?
Is Blam still working for CCP?
"Pulvis et umbra sumus. (We are but dust and shadow.)"
GÇò Horace, The Odes of Horace
|
emtbraincase
Falconpunch Hatesurfers
20
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 06:22:00 -
[83] - Quote
It's all fun and games till a blueberry steals your dropship and recalls it. Or your tank. Or your logiLAV. If it has to be an enemy, then this would easily be used to transfer vehicles for isk transfers, thus circumventing the market restrictions currently in place.
That being said, I support this idea. |
KingBlade82
NECROM0NGERS
207
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 07:49:00 -
[84] - Quote
CCP Blam! wrote:This is a great thread. Let me provide some background.
We have discussed allowing players to directly salvage items - not just for vehicles, on the battlefield. I really like the proposal for the vehicle salvage, where hacked vehicles can be recalled into the hacker's inventory. To do this however, we would have to resolve a couple of technical issues:
1. Rather than making a vehicle usable by a particular team/individual after being hacked, enforce the concept of a new "owner" of the vehicle, so that the vehicle knows where to go to when being recalled.
2. Each blueprint and corresponding item would need to be linked. It wouldn't be feasible (or make much sense) to allow players who have hacked a vehicle that is a blueprint or has blueprints on it to inherit that blueprint. Rather, we would want a recall to place a blueprint's corresponding consumable item in the player's inventory.
This isn't a gargantuan task, but it's not something we can quickly deploy as part of a hotfix.
Thanks for the feedback guys, I will see what I can do.
not our fault u added vehicle BPO's
JOIN NECROM0NGERS TODAY
need 10 mil SP and a mic
|
Levithunder
Butt Hurt Try Hards
121
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 09:25:00 -
[85] - Quote
CCP Blam! wrote:A little tack-on here - it goes without saying that going this route would mean that you wouldn't be able to call in your salvage if you don't have the skills for it. It would work just as any other item you have in your inventory. Tag, you like my tag:D?
(-í° -£-û -í°) Nerf Me If You Dare.
|
Xaviah Reaper
Nyain San Proficiency V.
172
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 14:03:00 -
[86] - Quote
Abu Stij wrote:During several games last evening myself and several other members of the DUST 514 community were all talking about hacking vehicles in a battle.
Currently when you hack an enemy vehicle you simply are granted friendly access to the LAV/HAV or Dropship for however long it takes you to run it off a cliff and blow it up Gumball Rally style.
The assumption was made that if you hacked the vehicle, you could keep it in your assets as you effectively "stole" it from your enemy, much like scamming or more specifically looting occurs in EVE Online.
CCP and fellow DUST players, I propose a change to the current system in which if/when you hack someones vehicle you can recall it and save the vehicle for future deployment either in that battle, or in whatever battle you wish in the future. This vehicle would and should be represented in your post match "Salvage" section, on top of any other salvage you might have received during that match.
This game mechanic is both a way to curb people from spawning tons of vehicles in a match, as well as provide those who hack the vehicle a reward for their effort.
I have brought this up to a CPM0 member and he is in support of it, and I hope both CCP and the DUST community would consider this proposal a good way to curb the mass vehicle spawning and provide people more incentives to work in the "Hacking" side of things for their respective armies.
the issue with this is that you may hack something you cant use therefore cant deploy. so you'll fill your inventory with loads of random crap you cant use. |
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Kinsho Swords Caldari State
41
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 23:20:00 -
[87] - Quote
I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT SO MANY OF YOU LIKE THIS IDEAL . BUT THEN AGAIN I CAN . What if your not skilled in the mods or skilled enough to have YOUR OWN type of the same vehicle ??? Will this IDEAL be like how when you scavenge a weapon , that you can't use that said weapon , until YOU HAVE OBTAINED the skill to operate it ???? If that's the case then yes go ahead and use this , by all means . To have someone rolling around in a vehicle that they haven't put in the work to obtain the vehicle , vehicle mods , turrets and the skill set even just , SOUNDS FOOLISH and GREEDY as well as just STUPID and somewhat like a shortcut to scam the system , which might I add there is enough of that , that goes on already .
This is not something new and if CCP listens to you who like this ideal without implementing some specifics then that LETS ME KNOW what type of people that I support and they had me fooled .
You should have to gain the skill set NO QUESTIONS ASKED before you could operate whatever that you have obtained
But like someone already said this seems like having more stuff in your arsenal that your not using or just can't for those who don't have the skill and that just seems meaningless.
" Doubts are like flies and should be crushed !!!!!! " I hope that I am THE FLY SWATTER of those in my presence .
|
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
1036
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 23:27:00 -
[88] - Quote
I approve of this.
in the 9 months ive been playing its always been discussed, asked for, and wanted.
an added thought to make it work with the bpo vehicles...
the thief should get to keep that copy but the bpo should still remain the owner's |
Abu Stij
WaffleDingos
246
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 05:12:00 -
[89] - Quote
Xaviah Reaper wrote: the issue with this is that you may hack something you cant use therefore cant deploy. so you'll fill your inventory with loads of random crap you cant use.
So you're saying any items "looted" must be immediately usable by the person who looted them or stole them. You do realize how silly that is right?
Just because someone may not have the proper skills to use it doesn't mean they shouldn't even be able to steal it and store it in their hangar/war room. |
Komodo Jones
Chaotik Serenity
189
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 05:30:00 -
[90] - Quote
Great idea, but this brings up the question...how the hell are we able to pilot hacked vehicles in the first place without the correct skills to call one in yourself? Do the skills only apply to fitting the vehicle? No, several skills help functionality of any of the things you use in the game. My image of this plan being implemented is that you get the modules and the vehicle and the turrets just placed in your assets, in which case you wouldn't be able to use them anyway unless you had the right skills.
If it didn't happen like this then you're list of stolen vehicle fittings would become incredibly cluttered as alot of people have different fits of vehicles, therefore the only real application of stolen materials in this game unless by chance you had the skills to use them, would be to be sold on the market whenever it opens up. That is unless they modify the menu to accommodate the vast array of vehicles and other stolen gear that could be collected. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |