Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
CharCharOdell
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
71
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 02:37:00 -
[31] - Quote
One way to solve the ISK descrepency is to increase the payout in insant battles. |
Caeli SineDeo
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
470
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 02:42:00 -
[32] - Quote
Rusty Shallows wrote:Caeli SineDeo wrote:Rusty Shallows wrote:Caeli SineDeo wrote:I should be a able to kill a heavy faster then he kills me. In reality he has the element of surprise at all times Dropships you can easily tell when they are on the map heavies are not so easy. Forges are a little op but close to being in a good place. Please tell me that is a bad joke. I've been mowed down by Large Blasters many times while waiting for the charge timer on my assault forge. Tankers have no problem out DPSing me. Unless they are using Large Missiles, I still do not know if those have been un-nerfed yet. There was allot of fallout from the days when Missile Turrets were WIN. CCP should have just buffed Large Blasters rather than simultaneously nerfing all missiles last build. Caeli SineDeo wrote:Small vehicle turrets have been nerfed to hell. And need some buffing. I'm also thinking all turret skills are "must have skill 5s." For smalls if both the pilot and gunner don't both have enough stacking damage and a proto turret then their isn't any point even trying to get any kills. I am not talking about large turrets. I am talking about small for dropships. And trust me my gunner and me both have all small missile turrets maxed for max damage. still they underperform by a long shot . It should not take splash from 8+ missiles to kill a heavy. Direct hits should 1 shot most infantry besides the tankiest of the tankiest. 2-3 shot heavies. You have my respect for staying in Dropships. Gave up on them two or so game builds ago. In the last build a pilot with 5s in Small Missile Turrets and Turrets could with a decent gunner three shot large turret installations. This one time a guy kept count how long it took to blow up a supply depot and it was about 19 shots with a proto launcher. The missile splash is a legacy nerf. Missiles were "too good" so they were nerfed while blasters were buffed from being a comedic joke. Small missiles on Dropships were pretty terrifying at one time but I don't think they deserve their current state. Especially now that Dropships can't super tank with enough SP and isk. CCP really should revert them to the pre-blaster buff and see what happens. I know there would be missile sniping grumbling again but that can be solved by range limits.
What CCP needs to do is look at precursor. This build missiles where not complain as OP. Going into Codex they added both passive skills and damage mods. They became OP. They need to bring it so passive skills make it so small missile turrets perform how they did in precursor. The one major problem right now is that the splash radius is horrible. the range is **** when a forge can hit you at 425m yet you have lower then 100m with proto turrets.
I do not want to see codex I agree with anyone missiles where broken Splash could 1 hit heavies.
But precursor was the glory days. Handling was amazing. None of this floaty ass bullshit we have now. It felt like a heli does currently. Small adjustments made big movements. But fine tune handling could counter that. When you stoped somewhere you stopped you did not keep floating until you forced dropship to change direction. it is the future no one would produce a damn aircraft that floated around unable to stablize itself over a single location. it seems like there is no friction in the air against the damn things.
|
Pseudogenesis
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
4
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 02:45:00 -
[33] - Quote
Snaps Tremor wrote:and the match was still lost because it turns out you can't fire objective hacks from a tank barrel.
*runs to the suggestion thread, taking remote hack blasters with him* |
NOT slap26
Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation
51
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 02:48:00 -
[34] - Quote
Elrick Mercer wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:Gelan Corbaine wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:He had a 9K or maybe a standard with damage mods. I had a 5K shield gunlogi. It was...perfect. he could deny my access to an area, but never solo me unless I let him. I could still slaughter his teammates if he let me, but squared off against eachother, I could usually kill him, but half the time he'd get a couple of shots off and push me to another front. It was perfect. Why? BC it was std gear vs std modules. Against proto or even advanced gear I would have been 2-shotted, but this was balanced. I kept my distance to avoid AV nades, but it wasn't the 400 m distance expected. Maybe 50-200m max.
This ultimately means that either we need prototype vehicles or they need to lose prototype AV. It isn't a call for a buff or a nerf, but to fight fire with an equivalent amount of water; usually its like a campfire being put out by 7 fire trucks. You made a lot of money ........he made none.... I'm somehow failing to see how "perfect" it is .... His fits cost a fraction of what mine cost. If I die once, I lose 1 mil. How is THAT balanced? You said you could usually kill him so he didn't make anything back by denying you a position but lose out on ISK.... On the other hand you could kill him and his team which brings you in some money.... How is THAT balanced?
Post on your main or GTFO
|
Far Fall
DUST University Ivy League
15
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 02:54:00 -
[35] - Quote
Vaerana Myshtana wrote: Part of the reason that you see AVers so keen on soloing vehicles is because THAT is the only way for AV players to get rewarded. No killshot, no rewards.
If there was some better WP reward for AV other than killshots, that would fix a lot of the metagame balance issue.
For instance, if we got 50 WP for every 2000 HP of damage we inflicted to vehicles, that would help. Heck, I'd be fine if it was across the board for everyone, now that the game is tracking our total damage output. That 50WP per 2000 HP would also mean that the effective rewards for killing Advanced vehicles would be more commensurate with the challenge.
This is the good point. Actual combat balance of AV versus vehicles seems fine. People seem to be complaining about isk mostly, in that there is a lot of risk with no reward. A specialized AV user dumps a lot of skill points into those abilities, and spends money on those items, to get very very little isk in return. It is in fact hard to sustain such a path. The same can be said of dropships, in that they require much sp and isk, but return very little to no isk and wps back to the user. CCP should mainly figure out ways to award warpoints and isk to these users to make their VERY USEFUL builds/specializations rewarding for the user. |
DropKickSuicide
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
102
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 05:00:00 -
[36] - Quote
Far Fall wrote:Vaerana Myshtana wrote: Part of the reason that you see AVers so keen on soloing vehicles is because THAT is the only way for AV players to get rewarded. No killshot, no rewards.
If there was some better WP reward for AV other than killshots, that would fix a lot of the metagame balance issue.
For instance, if we got 50 WP for every 2000 HP of damage we inflicted to vehicles, that would help. Heck, I'd be fine if it was across the board for everyone, now that the game is tracking our total damage output. That 50WP per 2000 HP would also mean that the effective rewards for killing Advanced vehicles would be more commensurate with the challenge.
This is a good point. Actual combat balance of AV versus tanks seems fine. Isk payout is a very obvious issue howeve, in that there is a lot of risk for no reward with AVers. A specialized AV user dumps a lot of skill points into those abilities, and spends money on those items, to get very very little isk or warpoints in return. Which obviously discourages specific av users and hurts those who do chose to play that way. The same can be said of dropships, in that they require much sp and isk, but return very little to no isk or wps back to the user. CCP should mainly figure out ways to award warpoints and isk to these team players.
I cant agree more for bothe AV and DS,
I really like the Payout for Damage Dealt idea, Also I think ISK should be rewarded for how much ISK you cost other players.
One good example ( I think ) of how bad the ISK pay out is,
In 1 game I destroyed 3 tanks and killed 14 people totall, I made less then 200k ISK,
I died 3 times that game and it cost me over 300K. |
supersayinb
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
67
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 05:45:00 -
[37] - Quote
DropKickSuicide wrote:Far Fall wrote:Vaerana Myshtana wrote: Part of the reason that you see AVers so keen on soloing vehicles is because THAT is the only way for AV players to get rewarded. No killshot, no rewards.
If there was some better WP reward for AV other than killshots, that would fix a lot of the metagame balance issue.
For instance, if we got 50 WP for every 2000 HP of damage we inflicted to vehicles, that would help. Heck, I'd be fine if it was across the board for everyone, now that the game is tracking our total damage output. That 50WP per 2000 HP would also mean that the effective rewards for killing Advanced vehicles would be more commensurate with the challenge.
This is a good point. Actual combat balance of AV versus tanks seems fine. Isk payout is a very obvious issue howeve, in that there is a lot of risk for no reward with AVers. A specialized AV user dumps a lot of skill points into those abilities, and spends money on those items, to get very very little isk or warpoints in return. Which obviously discourages specific av users and hurts those who do chose to play that way. The same can be said of dropships, in that they require much sp and isk, but return very little to no isk or wps back to the user. CCP should mainly figure out ways to award warpoints and isk to these team players. I cant agree more for bothe AV and DS, I really like the Payout for Damage Dealt idea, Also I think ISK should be rewarded for how much ISK you cost other players. One good example ( I think ) of how bad the ISK pay out is, In 1 game I destroyed 3 tanks and killed 14 people totall, I made less then 200k ISK, I died 3 times that game and it cost me over 300K.
If they were to release an actual good weapon that fits in the side arm slot it would help. As is stands, if you're fitted for AV and encounter any infantry you're virtually defenseless. Give the poor heavy's a gun that they can actually stand a fighting chance in, like the compact AR that comes with the black eagle suit. |
DropKickSuicide
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
102
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 06:01:00 -
[38] - Quote
supersayinb wrote:DropKickSuicide wrote:Far Fall wrote:Vaerana Myshtana wrote: Part of the reason that you see AVers so keen on soloing vehicles is because THAT is the only way for AV players to get rewarded. No killshot, no rewards.
If there was some better WP reward for AV other than killshots, that would fix a lot of the metagame balance issue.
For instance, if we got 50 WP for every 2000 HP of damage we inflicted to vehicles, that would help. Heck, I'd be fine if it was across the board for everyone, now that the game is tracking our total damage output. That 50WP per 2000 HP would also mean that the effective rewards for killing Advanced vehicles would be more commensurate with the challenge.
This is a good point. Actual combat balance of AV versus tanks seems fine. Isk payout is a very obvious issue howeve, in that there is a lot of risk for no reward with AVers. A specialized AV user dumps a lot of skill points into those abilities, and spends money on those items, to get very very little isk or warpoints in return. Which obviously discourages specific av users and hurts those who do chose to play that way. The same can be said of dropships, in that they require much sp and isk, but return very little to no isk or wps back to the user. CCP should mainly figure out ways to award warpoints and isk to these team players. I cant agree more for bothe AV and DS, I really like the Payout for Damage Dealt idea, Also I think ISK should be rewarded for how much ISK you cost other players. One good example ( I think ) of how bad the ISK pay out is, In 1 game I destroyed 3 tanks and killed 14 people totall, I made less then 200k ISK, I died 3 times that game and it cost me over 300K. If they were to release an actual good weapon that fits in the side arm slot it would help. As is stands, if you're fitted for AV and encounter any infantry you're virtually defenseless. Give the poor heavy's a gun that they can actually stand a fighting chance in, like the compact AR that comes with the black eagle suit.
I agree, I always have a SMG on the side but if they out of range or more then 1-2 I have no chance.
And with the splash damage being bugged using the FG on infantry is a challenge |
EKH0 0ne
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 06:05:00 -
[39] - Quote
BobThe843CakeMan wrote:Gelan Corbaine wrote:Veritas Vitae wrote:Sometimes you sacrifice your income and stats in a match to be a better use to your team. Preventing a tank from steamrolling your team, even if you never kill the tank, is effectively removing the tank from the field of battle, making it so your infantry can focus on the enemy infantry. That is a vital, yet thankless role that AV plays. Watching an AV guy go 2-5 yet watching the enemy tank only get at most 10 kills when you know they could have gotten 30-40 without your AV guy is a beautiful thing. It's beautiful right up until you hit the poor house . It's a basic fact of New Eden . If you are losing the ISK war , then you are losing the war period ! Sorry but no merc should be running a charity ..... that goes against the entire idea of being a merc ! charity 1 day highly paid merc for doing it another day. u lose money one day and get hired by a corp tht will pay u the next.
Oh yeah because thats how it works in practice right,
" Hey Delta Force, I went 2-4 with my av guy, but im a real team player and i stopped a tank. Hire me for 5 million isk please" |
Im a PIGEON
Reckoners
14
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 06:31:00 -
[40] - Quote
I run a Sica with the ST-201 Missile launcher and every other module on it is Militia.
It has well over 5k EHP on its shields. Edging pretty close to 6k. I have room to upgrade it without moving into Standard equipment.
Prototype vehicles would be nice to see, but I don't think they're needed right now. |
|
Ninjanomyx
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
61
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 07:10:00 -
[41] - Quote
Why are people so obliviously bad @ this Game??? AV Tiers are not at all balanced to Vehicles. The HAV & LAV Buffs are just a Band-Aid tbh as the PG still suffers. If you get paid too little for AV "Effort" then you are bad @ DUST....... I "Bumblebee" (Now "Wasp") w/ a Duvo-TAC & ADV AV Nades & get more Kills than I would have in a Tank, even w/o a single Enemy Tank fielded, & risk significantly less ISK. If that's not enough.....swap to MLT Forge on Free Suit + Free Mods, Toxin & MLT Locus Nades (or STD Flux if I wanna be "That Guy") & get EZ $$$ & Tank Tears.
If you can't manage at least 1 Infantry Kill as a FGer.....you are obsolete. Heavy Suits & Weapons dropped in price while Tanks got more expensive. ADV AV is plenty to Solo a Tank (God forbid you need to "Specialize") so you can quite easily upgrade Nades or Sidearm or w/e (HMG or AR + Supply Depot). But no.....not enough for ya to possibly 1-3 Shot anything on the Map w/ a little bit of "Skill". Swarms are Fire & Forget, Sidearm &/or Nade Advice applies here as well. Hell........Speed Tank & AV, Depot, WIN DUST. But of course we all need to MLT Solo ALL Vehicles before "Happiness" ensues.
TL:DR: Nerf FG Range, lower Tank & Turret prices, & bring out Tanks above STD.....seriously.
PS: Active Shield Hardeners are still trash & need 30 Pulse/10 Cooldown. KB still faster & unbalanced for Tanking. L2Code KthxBAI :P |
Far Fall
DUST University Ivy League
15
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 07:59:00 -
[42] - Quote
I was essentially going to respond that it should be that av players should have to specialize in proto forges and swarms to take down proto tanks, and that it should be that an av player shouldn't really have a lot of time to focus on killing the other infantry with his forge gun. When this occurs there should be specific warpoints for av activities as the av player won't be getting wp or isk from infantry kills.
So I agree with you, but I still hold that specific av actions should have wp associated with them (along with dropship actions). |
DropKickSuicide
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
103
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 08:08:00 -
[43] - Quote
Ninjanomyx wrote: Why are people so obliviously bad @ this Game??? AV Tiers are not at all balanced to Vehicles. The HAV & LAV Buffs are just a Band-Aid tbh as the PG still suffers. If you get paid too little for AV "Effort" then you are bad @ DUST....... I "Bumblebee" (Now "Wasp") w/ a Duvo-TAC & ADV AV Nades & get more Kills than I would have in a Tank, even w/o a single Enemy Tank fielded, & risk significantly less ISK. If that's not enough.....swap to MLT Forge on Free Suit + Free Mods, Toxin & MLT Locus Nades (or STD Flux if I wanna be "That Guy") & get EZ $$$ & Tank Tears.
If you can't manage at least 1 Infantry Kill as a FGer.....you are obsolete. Heavy Suits & Weapons dropped in price while Tanks got more expensive. ADV AV is plenty to Solo a Tank (God forbid you need to "Specialize") so you can quite easily upgrade Nades or Sidearm or w/e (HMG or AR + Supply Depot). But no.....not enough for ya to possibly 1-3 Shot anything on the Map w/ a little bit of "Skill". Swarms are Fire & Forget, Sidearm &/or Nade Advice applies here as well. Hell........Speed Tank & AV, Depot, WIN DUST. But of course we all need to MLT Solo ALL Vehicles before "Happiness" ensues.
TL:DR: Nerf FG Range, lower Tank & Turret prices, & bring out Tanks above STD.....seriously.
PS: Active Shield Hardeners are still trash & need 30 Pulse/10 Cooldown. KB still faster & unbalanced for Tanking. L2Code KthxBAI :P
why does FG need another range nerf?
and I dont think anyone was asking for free "Effort" WP/ISK, that would be like hey Assualts you get 10wp for every landed bullet cuz Ya'know you tried
But the payot of actually being AV needs to be higher, Its stupid you can solo a tank or 2 and get paid the same as the guy that killed 1-3 infentry |
DropKickSuicide
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
104
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 08:11:00 -
[44] - Quote
Far Fall wrote:I was essentially going to respond that it should be that av players should have to specialize in proto forges and swarms to take down proto tanks, and that it should be that an av player shouldn't really have a lot of time to focus on killing the other infantry with his forge gun. When this occurs there should be specific warpoints for av activities as the av player won't be getting wp or isk from infantry kills.
So I agree with you, but I still hold that specific av actions should have wp associated with them (along with dropship actions).
I can say that even tho its not really NEEDED it does help ALOT to specielize when going up against good Tanks.
BUT with that said I rarely EVER need to use anything more then an ADV Assualt FG+ DAM. Mods. |
Rogatien Merc
Ill Omens EoN.
48
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 12:49:00 -
[45] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:Veritas Vitae wrote:Sometimes you sacrifice your income and stats in a match to be a better use to your team. Preventing a tank from steamrolling your team, even if you never kill the tank, is effectively removing the tank from the field of battle, making it so your infantry can focus on the enemy infantry. That is a vital, yet thankless role that AV plays. Watching an AV guy go 2-5 yet watching the enemy tank only get at most 10 kills when you know they could have gotten 30-40 without your AV guy is a beautiful thing. Thank you. The purpose of AV is to deny tanks access to an area, not kill them. Only tanks and DS's should be as to solo tanks. Convenient definition of AV lol |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |