Really good report!

The blue on black is tough to read, a different color than blue or different background would fix that. The font doesn't help.

On top 250 players, how is that defined? Is that lifetime WP? If so, it's not an accurate measurement. I'd say WP within the last month or three months would be a more accurate gauge. Not sure if that's available in your dataset, though.

For now its lifetime WP, I could do recently active but I think that is a less meaningful metric. To be in the lifetime top 250 we are talking many hundreds of hours. These are the players with the most SP and the most overall battlefield experience. Another thing to note is that if a player is not highly active they fall from the top rankings quickly. There are a few exceptions of course, players who quit after massive play, however despite the drama in the forums that number is extremely small. I can look for the next report and see how many of the top 250 are not playing anymore, I think its around 5-10.

At the end of the day weekly active tracking without crest would still be limited to top 1000 because of the leaderboard, and require at least 5x more work than top 250 tracking, so even if its marginally better (I personally don't think it is) it is not possible at this point for me.

I thought it was kills >.< wps boring....

For now its lifetime WP, I could do recently active but I think that is a less meaningful metric. To be in the lifetime top 250 we are talking many hundreds of hours. These are the players with the most SP and the most overall battlefield experience. Another thing to note is that if a player is not highly active they fall from the top rankings quickly. There are a few exceptions of course, players who quit after massive play, however despite the drama in the forums that number is extremely small. I can look for the next report and see how many of the top 250 are not playing anymore, I think its around 5-10.

At the end of the day weekly active tracking without crest would still be limited to top 1000 because of the leaderboard, and require at least 5x more work than top 250 tracking, so even if its marginally better (I personally don't think it is) it is not possible at this point for me.

It was actually by more than 60& armor on the MCC, we held two objectives exclusively the entire match, you flipped the second objective, we responded by taking your objective behind you, I recorded it, don't lie and say you won by 2-3 ticks.

You guys realize this game is based on Mercenary work right? How can you poach when everyone is supposed to be Mercs?

I take it the other 44 "top 100 corps" have no alliance? I only counted 66 on that page.

http://i.imgur.com/lGsTrUl.jpg

EDIT: included image, and I forgot to tell you how great of a job you did, keep up the good work!