DUST Search - Corporation/Alliance Report [5/5]-[5/12]

All Channels

General Discussions

Corporation/Alliance Report [5/5]-[5/12]

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Mavado V Noriega SyNergy Gaming EoN. 3128	Posted - 2013.05.13 01:39:00 - [61] - Quote undeadsoldier90 wrote: Mavado V Noriega wrote: LeCuch wrote: Mavado V Noriega wrote: undeadsoldier90 wrote: First off its not poaching if the players aproached me. Secondly proof? Because im pretty sure I never sent a single person who joined recently a message. They joined hellstorm because they wanted to not because I used a jedi mind trick and coerced them into joining. Check your facts before calling people or corps poachers and also irs a video game you cant blame people for wanting to play with people that they actually like. kujo has the pic 1 of ur guys spammed kobrah with lol maple left cuz of his friends in hellstorm i got no issue with any of em that left ppl are free to go same with squagga an co. We lost some kool ppl who i enjoyed playing with but nothing that hurts us skillwise tbh just making sure everyone got their facts straight OT: nice work as always OP still always amazes me seeing how active we are despite being half and even 1/3 the size of other groups Dunno why they joined. They kinda just ditched us because they wanted a different corp, which i think is stupid. Why would i go with them if they just left so they could be in a bigger corp? That was the only reason really for them, PC. Quality > Quantity is what i always tell ppl. Doesnt matter if ppl join a corp with a **** load of members if most are terrible. Wait.... didnt hellstorm beat synergy. Wait wait wait..... didnt unreal beat synergy? Wait wait wait wait... didnt a large majority of good players from unreal join hellstorm? Maybe my memory is skewed..... As I said before z and the arrogance guys and squagga and his guys joined hellstorm because they like the way we run stuff, they like our player base not because they are good but because they are good people. I have no beef with you mavado but trash talking a corp that has beaten you just doesnt match up.... 1st off that was a general statement 2ndly if u played the unreal and hellstorm games then u would of seen we pretty much beat ourselves, in no way shape or form did u outclass us when we dominated ur vehicles and infantry but late starts cost us. 3rd i have no beef with u but u did throw jabs and if u honestly think u outclass us then kool on u but i wouldnt get too overconfident , would be a shame if u lost to a Not Even Decent grp after callin us "EoN noobs"
Mavado V Noriega SyNergy Gaming EoN. 3128	Posted - 2013.05.13 01:41:00 - [62] - Quote LeCuch wrote: Draxus Prime wrote: is orion empire the biggest dust allince? I thought it was Cronos, and then EoN Orion Empire is by far the biggest DUST alliance around 3300 members EoN. is one of the smallest DUST alliances
LeCuch Red Star. EoN. 94	Posted - 2013.05.13 01:50:00 - [63] - Quote Mavado V Noriega wrote: LeCuch wrote: Draxus Prime wrote: is orion empire the biggest dust allince? I thought it was Cronos, and then EoN Orion Empire is by far the biggest DUST alliance around 3300 members EoN. is one of the smallest DUST alliances My bad ._. listen to mavado
Enkidu Camuel The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION 89	Posted - 2013.05.13 01:50:00 - [64] - Quote Mavado V Noriega wrote: LeCuch wrote: Draxus Prime wrote: is orion empire the biggest dust allince? I thought it was Cronos, and then EoN Orion Empire is by far the biggest DUST alliance around 3300 members EoN. is one of the smallest DUST alliances Here are some numbers of the biggest alliances so far: Orion Empire: 3385 ROFL: 2600 CRONOS: 1930 Eon.: 943
undeadsoldier90 Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 413	Posted - 2013.05.13 01:51:00 - [65] - Quote @mavado Wins a win bro. And as for dominating our vehicles and infantry. .... cool story lol. And that was not a general statement since the linked post was directly related to hellstorm and your former members. Its ok though I forgive you. You know not what you say.
shade emry3 Conspiratus Immortalis League of Infamy 28	Posted - 2013.05.13 02:02:00 - [66] - Quote King Kobrah wrote: undeadsoldier90 wrote: King Kobrah wrote: undeadsoldier90 wrote: First off its not poaching if the players aproached me. Secondly proof? Because im pretty sure I never sent a single person who joined recently a message. They joined hellstorm because they wanted to not because I used a jedi mind trick and coerced them into joining. Check your facts before calling people or corps poachers and also irs a video game you cant blame people for wanting to play with people that they actually like. I'm not blaming anyone for anything, I'm telling you to please keep doing what you're doing. It's kinda like a free janitor service for various corporations. Janitor service lol. And I suppose exmaple zbroadway getshotup spyder apyra gem cutyer squagga and a hand full of other vwry good players are trash? Lol what ever floats your boat bro. I never called any of those players trash, don't put words in my mouth. Don't you have some spills to be mopping up or something ^^ this guy cracks me up, these forums are great, i just need a six pack and some popcorn..
King Kobrah SyNergy Gaming EoN. 266	Posted - 2013.05.13 02:11:00 - [67] - Quote undeadsoldier90 wrote: Mavado V Noriega wrote: LeCuch wrote: Mavado V Noriega wrote: undeadsoldier90 wrote: First off its not poaching if the players aproached me. Secondly proof? Because im pretty sure I never sent a single person who joined recently a message. They joined hellstorm because they wanted to not because I used a jedi mind trick and coerced them into joining. Check your facts before calling people or corps poachers and also irs a video game you cant blame people for wanting to play with people that they actually like. kujo has the pic 1 of ur guys spammed kobrah with lol maple left cuz of his friends in hellstorm i got no issue with any of em that left ppl are free to go same with squagga an co. We lost some kool ppl who i enjoyed playing with but nothing that hurts us skillwise tbh just making sure everyone got their facts straight OT: nice work as always OP still always amazes me seeing how active we are despite being half and even 1/3 the size of other groups Dunno why they joined. They kinda just ditched us because they wanted a different corp, which i think is stupid. Why would i go with them if they just left so they could be in a bigger corp? That was the only reason really for them, PC. Quality > Quantity is what i always tell ppl. Doesnt matter if ppl join a corp with a **** load of members if most are terrible. Wait.... didnt hellstorm beat synergy. Wait wait wait..... didnt unreal beat synergy? Wait wait wait wait... didnt a large majority of good players from unreal join hellstorm? Maybe my memory is skewed..... As I said before z and the arrogance guys and squagga and his guys joined hellstorm because they like the way we run stuff, they like our player base not because they are good but because they are good people. I have no beef with you mavado but trash talking a corp that has beaten you just doesnt match up.... You weren't even in that CB, which is unfortunate, you missed my first place 18-6 performance. That all goes out the window anyways, if you haven't noticed, we're 16v16 now with an entirely different set of "balance" in an entirely different build why you would bring this up is beyond me; stick to cleaning toilets.
LeCuch Red Star. EoN. 96	Posted - 2013.05.13 02:11:00 - [68] - Quote undeadsoldier90 wrote: @mavado Wins a win bro. And as for dominating our vehicles and infantry. .... cool story lol. And that was not a general statement since the linked post was directly related to hellstorm and your former members. Its ok though I forgive you. You know not what you say. Hellstorm reminds me of the wolf from red riding hood. All big and bad It was a wolf right? Can't remember
undeadsoldier90 Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 415	Posted - 2013.05.13 02:13:00 - [69] - Quote LeCuch wrote: undeadsoldier90 wrote: @mavado Wins a win bro. And as for dominating our vehicles and infantry. .... cool story lol. And that was not a general statement since the linked post was directly related to hellstorm and your former members. Its ok though I forgive you. You know not what you say. Hellstorm reminds me of the wolf from red riding hood. All big and bad It was a wolf right? Can't remember Pretty sure it was a wolf but I could be mistaken.... But thanks for the compliment
Dis Cord Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 114	Posted - 2013.05.13 02:15:00 - [70] - Quote Ydubbs81 RND wrote: Keyser Soze VerbalKint wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: That's the thing.....once you are in an alliance, your corp numbers doesn't matter. Your corp activity doesn't matter either. Well until alliance members can freely enter the matches of other alliance corps. Or at the least we as corp directors and alliance directors(hope we get this role soon) can create preapproved lists so that players can be approved on a name to name basis will be far better. (this of course should be tied into a merc request option, so players arent freely joining each other matches unless specifically requested by the contracted corp.) Because everyone else is aligning...it may be an imperative to get on board with others. But I feel that they need to get rid of the option to allow ringers. Alliances should only be able to provide training support, financial support, trading between one another, and not attack each other's territories. But ringers shouldn't be allowed...what's the point in forming a corporation when you won't fight your own battles. Merc work. Coalitions. "Blues." You just threw away basically every other player organization potential except for Alliance. It sounds like you want pre-defined battles rather than an open sandbox. This option should be available in arena play if/when CCP implements it. The limitation you propose makes no sense in the greater scheme of New Eden.

DJINN Marauder Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 565	Posted - 2013.05.13 02:23:00 - [71] - Quote LeCuch wrote: undeadsoldier90 wrote: @mavado Wins a win bro. And as for dominating our vehicles and infantry. .... cool story lol. And that was not a general statement since the linked post was directly related to hellstorm and your former members. Its ok though I forgive you. You know not what you say. Hellstorm reminds me of the wolf from red riding hood. All big and bad It was a wolf right? Can't remember We're not that bad
Ydubbs81 RND Ahrendee Mercenaries 1234	Posted - 2013.05.13 02:26:00 - [72] - Quote Dis Cord wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: Keyser Soze VerbalKint wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: That's the thing.....once you are in an alliance, your corp numbers doesn't matter. Your corp activity doesn't matter either. Well until alliance members can freely enter the matches of other alliance corps. Or at the least we as corp directors and alliance directors(hope we get this role soon) can create preapproved lists so that players can be approved on a name to name basis will be far better. (this of course should be tied into a merc request option, so players arent freely joining each other matches unless specifically requested by the contracted corp.) Because everyone else is aligning...it may be an imperative to get on board with others. But I feel that they need to get rid of the option to allow ringers. Alliances should only be able to provide training support, financial support, trading between one another, and not attack each other's territories. But ringers shouldn't be allowed...what's the point in forming a corporation when you won't fight your own battles. Merc work. Coalitions. "Blues." You just threw away basically every other player organization potential except for Alliance. It sounds like you want pre-defined battles rather than an open sandbox. This option should be available in arena play if/when CCP implements it. The limitation you propose makes no sense in the greater scheme of New Eden. "Blues"? I'm not talking about Eve....... I am also not saying that alliances in Dust shouldn't be allowed. I'm just saying that allowing anyone to join your corp match, shouldn't be allowed. I don't know how this ruins everything that Dust stands for. The only thing that this will change is that corps will have to actually fight their own battles. If you have only 4 people in your corp, you shouldn't be able to hold districts. But according to this system, that 4-man corp can hold 5 districts depending on how large and skilled their alliance is. This current system is almost making the corporation null and void and placing more emphasis on how strong your alliance members are.
undeadsoldier90 Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 415	Posted - 2013.05.13 02:26:00 - [73] - Quote Lol cleaning toilets.... well as it stands now hellstorm 1 synergy 0... Anything you say does not detract from the fact that you guys lost. So when PC comes put on your big boy pants and we will see who is who. So go back to flipping them burgers at micky d's son.
Darken-Sol BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate 61	Posted - 2013.05.13 02:30:00 - [74] - Quote i build the houses and apartment buildings u live in. what does a job have to do with the price of tea in china?
Harkon Vysarii Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 252	Posted - 2013.05.13 02:31:00 - [75] - Quote Yus I want to see a merc war in space do it!
Dis Cord Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 114	Posted - 2013.05.13 02:35:00 - [76] - Quote Ydubbs81 RND wrote: Dis Cord wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: Keyser Soze VerbalKint wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: That's the thing.....once you are in an alliance, your corp numbers doesn't matter. Your corp activity doesn't matter either. Well until alliance members can freely enter the matches of other alliance corps. Or at the least we as corp directors and alliance directors(hope we get this role soon) can create preapproved lists so that players can be approved on a name to name basis will be far better. (this of course should be tied into a merc request option, so players arent freely joining each other matches unless specifically requested by the contracted corp.) Because everyone else is aligning...it may be an imperative to get on board with others. But I feel that they need to get rid of the option to allow ringers. Alliances should only be able to provide training support, financial support, trading between one another, and not attack each other's territories. But ringers shouldn't be allowed...what's the point in forming a corporation when you won't fight your own battles. Merc work. Coalitions. "Blues." You just threw away basically every other player organization potential except for Alliance. It sounds like you want pre-defined battles rather than an open sandbox. This option should be available in arena play if/when CCP implements it. The limitation you propose makes no sense in the greater scheme of New Eden. "Blues"? I'm not talking about Eve....... I am also not saying that alliances in Dust shouldn't be allowed. I'm just saying that allowing anyone to join your corp match, shouldn't be allowed. I don't know how this ruins everything that Dust stands for. The only thing that this will change is that corps will have to actually fight their own battles. If you have only 4 people in your corp, you shouldn't be able to hold districts. But according to this system, that 4-man corp can hold 5 districts depending on how large and skilled their alliance is. This current system is almost making the corporation null and void and placing more emphasis on how strong your alliance members are. It's all about the isk.
Kira Lannister Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 889	Posted - 2013.05.13 02:45:00 - [77] - Quote I ain't trying to poach, but movado and kobrah. I got a r42 up. :] whispers seductively just press x...
Ydubbs81 RND Ahrendee Mercenaries 1234	Posted - 2013.05.13 03:38:00 - [78] - Quote Dis Cord wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: Dis Cord wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: Keyser Soze VerbalKint Well until alliance members can freely enter the matches of other alliance corps. Or at the least we as corp directors and alliance directors(hope we get this role soon) can create preapproved lists so that players can be approved on a name to name basis will be far better. (this of course should be tied into a merc request option, so players arent freely joining each other matches unless specifically requested by the contracted corp.) Because everyone else is aligning...it may be an imperative to get on board with others. But I feel that they need to get rid of the option to allow ringers. Alliances should only be able to provide training support, financial support, trading between one another, and not attack each other's territories. But ringers shouldn't be allowed...what's the point in forming a corporation when you won't fight your own battles. Merc work. Coalitions. "Blues." You just threw away basically every other player organization potential except for Alliance. It sounds like you want pre-defined battles rather than an open sandbox. This option should be available in arena play if/when CCP implements it. The limitation you propose makes no sense in the greater scheme of New Eden. "Blues"? I'm not talking about Eve....... I am also not saying that alliances in Dust shouldn't be allowed. I'm just saying that allowing anyone to join your corp match, shouldn't be allowed. I don't know how this ruins everything that Dust stands for. The only thing that this will change is that corps will have to actually fight their own battles. If you have only 4 people in your corp, you shouldn't be able to hold districts. But according to this system, that 4-man corp can hold 5 districts depending on how large and skilled their alliance is. This current system is almost making the corporation null and void and placing more emphasis on how strong your alliance members are. It's all about the isk. [:lol: wrote: yeah, I dig it but after a certain amount...what's the point? If a corp has $20B or $5B...the significance of the difference means nothing. Especially, when there aren't any billion ISK worth of gear. At least, without ringers, corps can say that they are the best or they are one of the best.
Dis Cord Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 115	Posted - 2013.05.13 03:40:00 - [79] - Quote Ydubbs81 RND wrote: yeah, I dig it but after a certain amount...what's the point? If a corp has $20B or $5B...the significance of the difference means nothing. Especially, when there aren't any billion ISK worth of gear. At least, without ringers, corps can say that they are the best or they are one of the best. In your example, the ringers would be the best.
TheSprayNPray2 Red Star. EoN. 23	Posted - 2013.05.13 03:42:00 - [80] - Quote undeadsoldier90 wrote: LeCuch wrote: undeadsoldier90 wrote: @mavado Wins a win bro. And as for dominating our vehicles and infantry. .... cool story lol. And that was not a general statement since the linked post was directly related to hellstorm and your former members. Its ok though I forgive you. You know not what you say. Hellstorm reminds me of the wolf from red riding hood. All big and bad It was a wolf right? Can't remember Pretty sure it was a wolf but I could be mistaken.... But thanks for the compliment So Hellstorm is a cross dressing wolf?

Mavado V Noriega SyNergy Gaming EoN. 3130	Posted - 2013.05.13 03:48:00 - [81] - Quote undeadsoldier90 wrote: Lol cleaning toilets.... well as it stands now hellstorm 1 synergy 0... Anything you say does not detract from the fact that you guys lost. So when PC comes put on your big boy pants and we will see who is who. So go back to flipping them burgers at micky d's son. is this also why u could only play on sundays? u mean to tell me out of almost 400 ppl u couldnt field an 8 during the weekday or sat? it had to be sunday? doesnt show me u have much confidence in ur members if u only have faith in a small few. We lost, where have i ever disputed a loss? Fact still remains u needed a 3min headstart to win and only won by 2-3 ticks left and the other one u had a man advantage for the 1st 5mins when i dc'd at the start........yet ask for a rematch and suddenly ppls dates and time schedules get full but hey ppl brag however they can get it right Anyway have fun. pce.
Darken-Sol BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate 62	Posted - 2013.05.13 03:53:00 - [82] - Quote there is a ton of coalitions and alliances not recorded. if u dont have an eve CEO its done by channels. theres hundreds of ppl to call on if u need a few bodies. theres corps that merc themselves out. i hope the big guys can watch their districts 24/7.
DJINN Kujo Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 76	Posted - 2013.05.13 06:16:00 - [83] - Quote Mavado V Noriega wrote: won by 2-3 ticks left It was actually by more than 60& armor on the MCC, we held two objectives exclusively the entire match, you flipped the second objective, we responded by taking your objective behind you, I recorded it, don't lie and say you won by 2-3 ticks.
NOT slap26 Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation 46	Posted - 2013.05.13 06:31:00 - [84] - Quote LOL at all the **** talking, the game sucks donkey nuts, who cares?
DJINN Marauder Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 565	Posted - 2013.05.13 06:54:00 - [85] - Quote Nvm
Deadeyes Anterie Ill Omens EoN. 514	Posted - 2013.05.13 09:28:00 - [86] - Quote NOT slap26 wrote: LOL at all the **** talking, the game sucks donkey nuts, who cares? I love how the comments are always a few degrees angrier when they come from alts. Mad CCP banned you?
mrunknown2u2 Ill Omens EoN. 3	Posted - 2013.05.13 09:36:00 - [87] - Quote Yes
Arramakaian Eka Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 498	Posted - 2013.05.13 09:52:00 - [88] - Quote Really good report! The blue on black is tough to read, a different color than blue or different background would fix that. The font doesn't help. On top 250 players, how is that defined? Is that lifetime WP? If so, it's not an accurate measurement. I'd say WP within the last month or three months would be a more accurate gauge. Not sure if that's available in your dataset, though.
mrunknown2u2 Ill Omens EoN. 3	Posted - 2013.05.13 09:55:00 - [89] - Quote Arramakaian Eka wrote: Really good report! The blue on black is tough to read, a different color than blue or different background would fix that. The font doesn't help. On top 250 players, how is that defined? Is that lifetime WP? If so, it's not an accurate measurement. I'd say WP within the last month or three months would be a more accurate gauge. Not sure if that's available in your dataset, though. Its top killers.
Ydubbs81 RND Ahrendee Mercenaries 1234	Posted - 2013.05.13 10:03:00 - [90] - Quote NOT slap26 wrote: LOL at all the **** talking, the game sucks donkey nuts, who cares? trash talking between Hellstorm and PFBHz was fine though?



Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page