Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
olssam 62
What The French CRONOS.
42
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 12:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
|
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax. CRONOS.
1469
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 12:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
It still has pretty crazy recoil on its shots. |
General John Ripper
ROGUE SPADES EoN.
148
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 12:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
lol really? should i start buying these and abusing them? |
Delta 749
Maverick Security Consulting
35
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 12:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
Its not that much more than the militia scrambler pistol which fires just as quickly and as accurately and you dont see people screaming to nerf that |
Chris F2112
187. Unclaimed.
172
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 12:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
They are absolutely absurd now. Far more range than a standard duvolle, and way more potential damage. The recoil is a bit hard to manage, but the range is worth it. |
Ted Nugget
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
97
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 12:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
General John Ripper wrote:lol really? should i start buying these and abusing them? sure the majority is using them too
|
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
160
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 12:54:00 -
[7] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Its not that much more than the militia scrambler pistol which fires just as quickly and as accurately and you dont see people screaming to nerf that militia scrambler pistol is not able to hit targets at 80m range and has 11 shots per reload at max. fail comparison is fail. |
Cat Merc
BetaMax. CRONOS.
970
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 12:54:00 -
[8] - Quote
Oh look, they actually have a use now. |
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
160
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 12:55:00 -
[9] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Oh look, they actually have a use now. and the wave of useless posts from cat cod514scrub continues |
RedRebelCork
Ahrendee Mercenaries
39
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 12:55:00 -
[10] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Its not that much more than the militia scrambler pistol which fires just as quickly and as accurately and you dont see people screaming to nerf that
To be fair, as a relatively new player I'm doing better with the GLU-5 Tac rifle than I've ever done and the only gun I fear in an assaults hands is the Duvolle Tac. Tac rifles are top dog in this build (imho). |
|
Mr Gloo Gloo
What The French CRONOS.
71
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 12:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
WTF ?????
Around 100 HP just ONE bullet with correct skills and a damager ?
Bad move, Tact AR day !!! |
Delta 749
Maverick Security Consulting
36
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 12:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Delta 749 wrote:Its not that much more than the militia scrambler pistol which fires just as quickly and as accurately and you dont see people screaming to nerf that militia scrambler pistol is not able to hit targets at 80m range and has 11 shots per reload at max. fail comparison is fail.
Max =/= effective range, with the recoil hitting things reliably, especially a moving target like every player with two brain cells, is almost entirely luck based Inside 20 yards is where you want to be which surprise surprise is good for the scrambler pistol as well, which is more accurate than the rifle when hip fired FYI |
Your Absolut End
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
44
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:00:00 -
[13] - Quote
lol, it is the weapon with the most range, right after the Sniper Rifles.
Last build everybody was complaining about the lasers, now you have a weapon which is even more OP then the Laser used to be but thats okay, simply because its an AR? Seriously? You all were complaining about the lasers, and right now, the TAR IS the laser.
CCP has to do something about this. Nerf the range, or nerf the dmg, or nerf the shooting frequency. Or do it like they did it to the laser: nerf every statistic this weapon has :D
The game feels now very different and I think most of the weapons are balanced because they are all quiet weak, even the protos. The problem with this is that the TAR stands out so much from this. So we have to make all weapons this powerful, or simply nerf this one weapon, your decision CCP. |
Delta 749
Maverick Security Consulting
36
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
RedRebelCork wrote:Delta 749 wrote:Its not that much more than the militia scrambler pistol which fires just as quickly and as accurately and you dont see people screaming to nerf that To be fair, as a relatively new player I'm doing better with the GLU-5 Tac rifle than I've ever done and the only gun I fear in an assaults hands is the Duvolle Tac. Tac rifles are top dog in this build (imho).
True but thats more to do with them being easier to aim now since they borked up the old sights, a lot of people switched since the tac has a dot sight and a bit of zoom |
SoLJae
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
400
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:06:00 -
[15] - Quote
RedRebelCork wrote: Tac rifles are top dog in this build (imho).
They've been trying to make the Tac a viable weapon for a long time now.
Back in the earliest builds the Breach was king. Then the reg ARs had their glory run, which we all know.
...and now it does appear that the Tac is a gonna be a killa and should be quite ubiquitous on the field.
|
Cat Merc
BetaMax. CRONOS.
970
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:14:00 -
[16] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Oh look, they actually have a use now. and the wave of useless posts from cat cod514scrub continues Oh, how cute. I don't play COD, Battlefield, or anything like that. You people don't see the 514 problems this game has that never existed in chromosome, and you blindly defend CCP because... well, drones. |
Your Absolut End
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
44
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:16:00 -
[17] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Jack McReady wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Oh look, they actually have a use now. and the wave of useless posts from cat cod514scrub continues Oh, how cute. I don't play COD, Battlefield, or anything like that. You people don't see the 514 problems this game has that never existed in chromosome, and you blindly defend CCP because... well, drones.
I'm not defending CCP here, they actually did some serious mistakes with this build, and if the TAR is the only weapon which owns now means we have 2 options right now: Option 1: Every weapon is broken, except for the TAR Option 2 The TAR is to strong.
Now make your choice. |
Ayures II
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
116
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:17:00 -
[18] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Its not that much more than the militia scrambler pistol which fires just as quickly and as accurately and you dont see people screaming to nerf that
Probably because it has less than half of the range and the magazine holds 6 (or less? I don't remember) rounds. |
Cat Merc
BetaMax. CRONOS.
970
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:19:00 -
[19] - Quote
Your Absolut End wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Jack McReady wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Oh look, they actually have a use now. and the wave of useless posts from cat cod514scrub continues Oh, how cute. I don't play COD, Battlefield, or anything like that. You people don't see the 514 problems this game has that never existed in chromosome, and you blindly defend CCP because... well, drones. I'm not defending CCP here, they actually did some serious mistakes with this build, and if the TAR is the only weapon which owns now means we have 2 options right now: Option 1: Every weapon is broken, except for the TAR Option 2 The TAR is to strong. Now make your choice. The TAR is strong. What I said before didn't mean the weapon is fine. It meant that it finally has a use. Though CCP forgot how it was before the nerf and overbuffed the weapon. |
Your Absolut End
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
45
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:23:00 -
[20] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Your Absolut End wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Jack McReady wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Oh look, they actually have a use now. and the wave of useless posts from cat cod514scrub continues Oh, how cute. I don't play COD, Battlefield, or anything like that. You people don't see the 514 problems this game has that never existed in chromosome, and you blindly defend CCP because... well, drones. I'm not defending CCP here, they actually did some serious mistakes with this build, and if the TAR is the only weapon which owns now means we have 2 options right now: Option 1: Every weapon is broken, except for the TAR Option 2 The TAR is to strong. Now make your choice. The TAR is strong. What I said before didn't mean the weapon is fine. It meant that it finally has a use. Though CCP forgot how it was before the nerf and overbuffed the weapon.
I think they just know 2 extremes, make weapons OP or weak as f*ck.
|
|
LeCuch
Red Star. EoN.
71
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:24:00 -
[21] - Quote
The damage is a bit high but its hard as heck to use. Im still trying to properly use it |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
450
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:26:00 -
[22] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Jack McReady wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Oh look, they actually have a use now. and the wave of useless posts from cat cod514scrub continues Oh, how cute. I don't play COD, Battlefield, or anything like that. You people don't see the 514 problems this game has that never existed in chromosome, and you blindly defend CCP because... well, drones.
ooo i want drones! |
Traky78
What The French CRONOS.
121
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:26:00 -
[23] - Quote
Tactiacal Assaut riffles are too op for the moment |
KingBabar
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
576
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:30:00 -
[24] - Quote
I dunno.
I've been trying to use it, it was semi successfull. The odd part is that its for me a very good cqc weapon, much better than the Duvolle. To land enough shots at distance though, especially on a moving target is very hard and only the very best manages to pull it off.
I am however very weary of bringing down the nerf hammer too soon. Do we want to go back to 90% of players using a Gek or a Duvolle?
I have to do some more testing but it seems to me that I don't have gun game enough (Just ask any Imp, I'm just a scrub...) to use it more effectively than I can with a 60 bullet AR, I don't think its right to ask for a nerf on that basis....
So far I've been shot a lot by tac ARs but they seldom kill me and they're almost useless at supression compared to the old laser, a little zig zagging and bunny hopping makes me close the distance in most chases without taking too much damage.
Let it be for now, its too early to tell. |
NAV HIV
The Generals EoN.
206
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:30:00 -
[25] - Quote
Your Absolut End wrote:lol, it is the weapon with the most range, right after the Sniper Rifles.
Last build everybody was complaining about the lasers, now you have a weapon which is even more OP then the Laser used to be but thats okay, simply because its an AR? Seriously? You all were complaining about the lasers, and right now, the TAR IS the laser.
CCP has to do something about this. Nerf the range, or nerf the dmg, or nerf the shooting frequency. Or do it like they did it to the laser: nerf every statistic this weapon has :D
The game feels now very different and I think most of the weapons are balanced because they are all quiet weak, even the protos. The problem with this is that the TAR stands out so much from this. So we have to make all weapons this powerful, or simply nerf this one weapon, your decision CCP.
There is big difference between a TAR and a Laser. You don't just slice your enemy under 2 seconds as lasers did. You'd actually have to aim and put it multiple shots. Nerf? Phhh... Why ? Killing you too many times? Pick one up and see if it's as easy as Lasers used to be.... |
Beren Hurin
OMNI Endeavors
434
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:31:00 -
[26] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Oh look, they actually have a use now. and the wave of useless posts from cat cod514scrub continues
Can we be friends :) |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
139
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:31:00 -
[27] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:It still has pretty crazy recoil on its shots.
Do you actually play this game or just blindly comment about it? |
Cat Merc
BetaMax. CRONOS.
973
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:33:00 -
[28] - Quote
Beren Hurin wrote:Jack McReady wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Oh look, they actually have a use now. and the wave of useless posts from cat cod514scrub continues Can we be friends :) Dumb and Dumber. No wait, its Drone and Droner. |
NAV HIV
The Generals EoN.
206
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:33:00 -
[29] - Quote
KingBabar wrote: I dunno.
I've been trying to use it, it was semi successfull. The odd part is that its for me a very good cqc weapon, much better than the Duvolle. To land enough shots at distance though, especially on a moving target is very hard and only the very best manages to pull it off.
I am however very weary of bringing down the nerf hammer too soon. Do we want to go back to 90% of players using a Gek or a Duvolle?
I have to do some more testing but it seems to me that I don't have gun game enough (Just ask any Imp, I'm just a scrub...) to use it more effectively than I can with a 60 bullet AR, I don't think its right to ask for a nerf on that basis....
So far I've been shot a lot by tac ARs but they seldom kill me and they're almost useless at supression compared to the old laser, a little zig zagging and bunny hopping makes me close the distance in most chases without taking too much damage.
Let it be for now, its too early to tell.
It isn't easy to use. Not with a DS3 atleast. I dont use KBM so can't comment on that. If KBM worked properly, this Gun would be very effective.... |
Beren Hurin
OMNI Endeavors
434
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:34:00 -
[30] - Quote
One difference is though that you see where its shots are coming from better than before. I don't think that's been mentioned yet. The damage still sucks when you are getting hit, but if you can survive a bit, running to cover is a little easier.
Plus if we could all get a 'feel' for the '11 rounds max' thing and know when its safe to run and hide that could help. |
|
Quil'n Khan
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 13:59:00 -
[31] - Quote
I just wanted to add my two cents in the matter. First, the TAC does not have a further range than the standard AR. They are the same distance. Think of the standard AR's dispersion pattern as an ice cream cone. The tip of the cone being the muzzle of the rifle and the top of the cone the target you are firing at. The shap shooter skill narrows that cone to better hit your target when firing full automatic.
The TAC rifle fires more accurately because it is single shot, thus less wasted shots when on target. The recoil compensates so you cant rapid fire in zoom mode, unless you skill to decrease the kick back. In cqc the TAC is at a disadvantage due to the single shot. So there is a trade off, as well as the smaller clip.
Personally i would say drop the damage down to mid 60's, increase the clip size to 36 and give it a hip fire 3 round burst ability while maintaining the single shot scope ability. Then it would be a well rounded weapon |
RedRebelCork
Ahrendee Mercenaries
40
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 14:14:00 -
[32] - Quote
Quil'n Khan wrote:I just wanted to add my two cents in the matter. First, the TAC does not have a further range than the standard AR. They are the same distance.
Not calling you a liar, but I think you might be incorrect. I'd wager the GLU-5 TAR has a 10-20m further reach than a militia AR. Have a link for that same distance claim? |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
198
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 14:27:00 -
[33] - Quote
NAV HIV wrote:Your Absolut End wrote:lol, it is the weapon with the most range, right after the Sniper Rifles.
Last build everybody was complaining about the lasers, now you have a weapon which is even more OP then the Laser used to be but thats okay, simply because its an AR? Seriously? You all were complaining about the lasers, and right now, the TAR IS the laser.
CCP has to do something about this. Nerf the range, or nerf the dmg, or nerf the shooting frequency. Or do it like they did it to the laser: nerf every statistic this weapon has :D
The game feels now very different and I think most of the weapons are balanced because they are all quiet weak, even the protos. The problem with this is that the TAR stands out so much from this. So we have to make all weapons this powerful, or simply nerf this one weapon, your decision CCP. There is big difference between a TAR and a Laser. You don't just slice your enemy under 2 seconds as lasers did. You'd actually have to aim and put it multiple shots. Nerf? Phhh... Why ? Killing you too many times? Pick one up and see if it's as easy as Lasers used to be....
I'll second that! Absolutely love the Tac though. |
Bones McGavins
TacoCat Industries
157
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 14:28:00 -
[34] - Quote
Yeah im 99% sure the TAC has a longer range than the standard ARs.
TAC + Scrambler is god at almost any range.
However lets be careful to avoid calling the TAC OP until we see the role scrambler rifles will play. I predict the scrambler rifle will be a slightly less damage, less kick, more range, TAC AR. In which case, youll see the battlefield dominated by both TAC AR and Scrambler Rifles, with normal ARs being more of a mid/ CQ role.
The thing about the TAC is if you get the drop on someone its less of an auto win than the regular AR because due to kick the effective DPS is lower. If I get the drop on someone with the standard ARs, they are dead before they can react. With the TAC, they can usually start running or turn around before I can get enough shots in due to kick.
Now...they are still likely very dead. But just saying, there are draw backs to it. It requires more skill to use. Hitting moving/strafing targets is harder cause you cant just spray at them. Personally I love the combat in this game with TAC rifles dominating compared to what it was before with standard rifles.
The old rifles felt more of a toss up 1on1, these feel like the better player wins. |
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
162
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 14:30:00 -
[35] - Quote
Quil'n Khan wrote: First, the TAC does not have a further range than the standard AR. They are the same distance. you are wrong and should feel bad for it.
proto Assault Rifle Max Range: 71m Optimal Range: 1 - 42m Meta: 8
proto Tactical Assault Rifle Max Range: 100m Optimal Range: 1 - 65m Meta: 9 |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
139
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 14:35:00 -
[36] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Quil'n Khan wrote: First, the TAC does not have a further range than the standard AR. They are the same distance. you are wrong and should feel bad for it. proto Assault Rifle Max Range: 71m Optimal Range: 1 - 42m Meta: 8 proto Tactical Assault Rifle Max Range: 100m Optimal Range: 1 - 65m Meta: 9
DUNI throwin the truth on em! |
Quil'n Khan
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 14:36:00 -
[37] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Quil'n Khan wrote: First, the TAC does not have a further range than the standard AR. They are the same distance. you are wrong and should feel bad for it. proto Assault Rifle Max Range: 71m Optimal Range: 1 - 42m Meta: 8 proto Tactical Assault Rifle Max Range: 100m Optimal Range: 1 - 65m Meta: 9
I stand corrected. Thank you for the clarification. As for feeling bad.....let think about it a moment.......nope...not feeling it..sorry. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
198
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 14:36:00 -
[38] - Quote
Quil'n Khan wrote:I just wanted to add my two cents in the matter. First, the TAC does not have a further range than the standard AR. They are the same distance...
I stopped reading after that. You are absolutely wrong:
Tac AR = 110m/71m optimal (and that was the standard version that no loner exists - the others are even further).
AR = 78m/35 optimal
Could someone please link the weapon effective ranges thread for this guy. I keep forgetting to favorite that damned thing. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
198
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 14:38:00 -
[39] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Quil'n Khan wrote: First, the TAC does not have a further range than the standard AR. They are the same distance. you are wrong and should feel bad for it. proto Assault Rifle Max Range: 71m Optimal Range: 1 - 42m Meta: 8 proto Tactical Assault Rifle Max Range: 100m Optimal Range: 1 - 65m Meta: 9
Was the thread updated? Did the ranges change? |
NAV HIV
The Generals EoN.
207
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 14:40:00 -
[40] - Quote
Bones McGavins wrote:Yeah im 99% sure the TAC has a longer range than the standard ARs.
TAC + Scrambler is god at almost any range.
However lets be careful to avoid calling the TAC OP until we see the role scrambler rifles will play. I predict the scrambler rifle will be a slightly less damage, less kick, more range, TAC AR. In which case, youll see the battlefield dominated by both TAC AR and Scrambler Rifles, with normal ARs being more of a mid/ CQ role.
The thing about the TAC is if you get the drop on someone its less of an auto win than the regular AR because due to kick the effective DPS is lower. If I get the drop on someone with the standard ARs, they are dead before they can react. With the TAC, they can usually start running or turn around before I can get enough shots in due to kick.
Now...they are still likely very dead. But just saying, there are draw backs to it. It requires more skill to use. Hitting moving/strafing targets is harder cause you cant just spray at them. Personally I love the combat in this game with TAC rifles dominating compared to what it was before with standard rifles.
The old rifles felt more of a toss up 1on1, these feel like the better player wins.
Agreed. Spending a lot of time, trying to get used to it. Its a good challege |
|
Happy Violentime
OMFGZOMBIESRUN
53
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 14:42:00 -
[41] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:It still has pretty crazy recoil on its shots.
You should get a modded controller then, recoil doesn't really seem to be an issue with those... |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens Orion Empire
166
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 14:43:00 -
[42] - Quote
I'm no sure what the numbers are ( CCP most have some data ) but i'm pretty sure is allot more people is using the Duvolle AR than the Tactical... it most be a reason for that... don't you think ? |
Happy Violentime
OMFGZOMBIESRUN
53
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 14:44:00 -
[43] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:I'm no sure what the numbers are ( CCP most have some data ) but i'm pretty sure allot more people is using the Duvolle AR than the Tactical... it most be a reason for that... don't you think ?
Either they have no skill or no modded controller.
|
Quil'n Khan
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 14:45:00 -
[44] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:Quil'n Khan wrote:I just wanted to add my two cents in the matter. First, the TAC does not have a further range than the standard AR. They are the same distance... I stopped reading after that. You are absolutely wrong: Tac AR = 110m/71m optimal (and that was the standard version that no loner exists - the others are even further). AR = 78m/35 optimal Could someone please link the weapon effective ranges thread for this guy. I keep forgetting to favorite that damned thing.
Was already linked to which i acknowledge being wrong, however your stats are off as well. You increased the TAC ranges a bit and decreased the AR ranges. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
199
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 14:58:00 -
[45] - Quote
Happy Violentime wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:I'm no sure what the numbers are ( CCP most have some data ) but i'm pretty sure allot more people is using the Duvolle AR than the Tactical... it most be a reason for that... don't you think ? Either they have no skill or no modded controller.
******* mod scrubs. Where is integrity/honor. Oh yah I can cheat at a game and beat every body. I'm so cool/good. *shakes his head* |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
199
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 15:00:00 -
[46] - Quote
Quil'n Khan wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:Quil'n Khan wrote:I just wanted to add my two cents in the matter. First, the TAC does not have a further range than the standard AR. They are the same distance... I stopped reading after that. You are absolutely wrong: Tac AR = 110m/71m optimal (and that was the standard version that no loner exists - the others are even further). AR = 78m/35 optimal Could someone please link the weapon effective ranges thread for this guy. I keep forgetting to favorite that damned thing. Was already linked to which i acknowledge being wrong, however your stats are off as well. You increased the TAC ranges a bit and decreased the AR ranges.
Yah they must have updated the thread with the new stats for uprising already. Those were the old stats though. |
Hawkings Greenback
D3ath D3alers RISE of LEGION
30
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 15:14:00 -
[47] - Quote
The duvolle tac is being used quite effectively by some people. I like the duvolle tac for the range, recoil is manageable & for me it isn't always easy to land shots on moving targets. So if you get killed by one then you were either stood still ( DON'T ) or they were a damn good shot & they deserved the kill. I prefer the Creo or Allotek.
Also when using the tac rifles you can avoid CQC where for me the aim & hit detection has gone for **** this build.
|
Quil'n Khan
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 15:23:00 -
[48] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:Quil'n Khan wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:Quil'n Khan wrote:I just wanted to add my two cents in the matter. First, the TAC does not have a further range than the standard AR. They are the same distance... I stopped reading after that. You are absolutely wrong: Tac AR = 110m/71m optimal (and that was the standard version that no loner exists - the others are even further). AR = 78m/35 optimal Could someone please link the weapon effective ranges thread for this guy. I keep forgetting to favorite that damned thing. Was already linked to which i acknowledge being wrong, however your stats are off as well. You increased the TAC ranges a bit and decreased the AR ranges. Yah they must have updated the thread with the new stats for uprising already. Those were the old stats though.
No biggie. The point i was trying to make was there were pluses and minuses to the weapon. I know there are those who use modded controllers to cheat the system. I would like to see them add a. 5 pause break between shots in zoom and a 3 round burst from hip fire with the same pause break. |
martinofski
Rebelles A Quebec Orion Empire
85
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 15:30:00 -
[49] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:Quil'n Khan wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:Quil'n Khan wrote:I just wanted to add my two cents in the matter. First, the TAC does not have a further range than the standard AR. They are the same distance... I stopped reading after that. You are absolutely wrong: Tac AR = 110m/71m optimal (and that was the standard version that no loner exists - the others are even further). AR = 78m/35 optimal Could someone please link the weapon effective ranges thread for this guy. I keep forgetting to favorite that damned thing. Was already linked to which i acknowledge being wrong, however your stats are off as well. You increased the TAC ranges a bit and decreased the AR ranges. Yah they must have updated the thread with the new stats for uprising already. Those were the old stats though.
Stats are.
Duvolle : 42m optimal, 70m max
TAC duvolle : 64m optimal, 100m max I tested ranges last night for 3 hours on various guns.
Note that hitting the head with a 2 shot burst at 80m with the tac grant you 112% eff. Add some dmg mods and a slow moving target, you can hit a guy which as let say 400hp in 4 shots, achievable under 1 second. really effective. It can drop a 1500hp heavy in 15 shots without to much issue. I do have seen turbo mod user too. firing those 900ish RPM the gun stats provide...15 shots per seconds, 1500DPS, but there is probably good kickback to control there. Reduce the max clicking RoF maybe, to bring the max to let say 800DPS?
+ seeing people saying it work better in CQC than long range make me feel this even more like a "best in all situation" gun |
DigiOps
Kirkinen Risk Control Caldari State
207
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 15:38:00 -
[50] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Quil'n Khan wrote: First, the TAC does not have a further range than the standard AR. They are the same distance. you are wrong and should feel bad for it. proto Assault Rifle Max Range: 71m Optimal Range: 1 - 42m Meta: 8 proto Tactical Assault Rifle Max Range: 100m Optimal Range: 1 - 65m Meta: 9 When did D-Uni guys get smart? |
|
p q
Zylak's Used Clones
6
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 15:46:00 -
[51] - Quote
Consider me a "medium" player; been here since open beta (Jan), have crappy thumbs, and have found my roles. The AR is king, has been for a while. Why? It's the weapon that fairs well on every map; open, metro... if your gonna spec in 1 weap, it should be the all purpose weap, the AR. In the previous build, the TAR sucked unless you chose to use a "cheater" mouse or similar controller (they are out there, I didn't buy either). Is the TAR overpowered for a new Duster, or just for those who have "magic rapid fire fingers", meaning, "cheater" devices? Maybe the TAR doesn't need any nerf apart from time between shots. Maybe "as fast as you can pull the trigger" is the problem. I hate the AR. I think the LR should be the "common" rifle in this universe... but the AR needs to stay strong because noobs love it, and we need noobs to build our Dust community. We have to convert CoD players, if we nerf the TAR it should be minor, say, 1 shot every 0.2 seconds? I am not a "ruler of the battlefield", but this is my opinion. |
DaOpa Magi
Static Corp
16
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 16:27:00 -
[52] - Quote
You guys know when this was changed? I did a data item dump a couple of days ago and it was 71.6...
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |