Damn!

Props to them for not being homos and crushing everybody with it.

And for not posting it on the forums for all to see to abuse like some other corps we know.

oh they posted it on the forums, but only after ccp patched it

Yeah really well what about props to ekho one who made a day before II?
The post gets moved, then i assume deleted because i cant find it anymore.
Everyone doubts me in the thread saying yeah right thats impossible.
Not a single thumbs up

The same night i post and after the devs obviously saw it because they moved the thread it gets fixed. and the credit is givin to someone who posts a video the day after...wow

Your welcome

Yeah really well what about props to ekho one who made a day before II?
The post gets moved, then i assume deleted because i cant find it anymore.
Everyone doubts me in the thread saying yeah right thats impossible.
Not a single thumbs up

The same night i post and after the devs obviously saw it because they moved the thread it gets fixed. and the credit is givin to someone who posts a video the day after...wow

Your welcome

The glitch was discovered, explored, and reported before your thread. Please, don't be childish. What's important is that we found a glitch and it was fixed. Who found it and reported it doesn't matter, as it was reported and fixed, and not abused. Besides, it's not like CCP gave us Type II Assault BPOs in Yellow and Black stripes.

I gotta admit, I was really hoping for those. We would have looked totally bad ass on the battlefield in them.

Wow, that could have been horribly abusive in pubs.

this is my point of view for this:
Immobile Infantry got reported to CCP staff for bugusing and now they are doing damage mitigation by saying "they were doing tests" and taking credit for bugusing in pub matches.

they were testing nothing, they only ruined the games of some poor new players in militia stuff. I saw sammus420 doing it several times in pub matches already last week and reported it accordingly...

the irony, just check this thread: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=676057#post676057
and they dared to ask "Do you have any proof to back up your claims?" and now they post the evidence by themself.

if you want to test something, make a corp match instead of ruining the experience of new players

IDK if you're a student at D-UNI or better represent them but I read bullkitten like this and think less of them. There's public tweets between devs and Immobile Infantry, it was discussed in IRC, there's an easily visible conversation between the two and you're making things up because of some kind of anti-Goon agenda.

Why are you so dishonest?

I only represent myself, also I specifically stated that this my point of view and if this is wrong then please answer those questions:

if they were testing something, please tell me why sammus420 was using it already last week, why have they used it in pub matches "for testing" when they could aswell make a corp match? and if it was for testing why was sammus420 teamkilling other players instead of his corpmates? as you can see in the thread I linked (which ironically is about II teamkilling others and you could provoke the bug via teamkilling), I already knew about this before so I am not making up things.

I'm not a Goon, nor can I speak for them, but I imagine any abuse of the exploit was the act of an individual.

I've seen Immobile Infantry leadership very clearly, after they immediately told CCP, pass on a "stop doing this". I've seen Cerebral Wolf dismiss the idea of sharing the exploit until it's fixed. I've seen internal discussion focused on fixing a gamebreaking bug and I've seen conversations between CCP and II focused on solving the problem.

EDIT: Also, +1 for the reasonable response to a fairly hostile post.

Are you rewarding someone for something they should do anyways? Just because they be gooning? Just question, no tone intended.

...but you're totally welcome to think that despite allegedly being made aware of the issue by several parties CCP decided only to reward Immobile Infantry because something something "they claimed the reward".