Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Sextus Hardcock
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
142
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 01:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
http://themittani.com/news/dust-514-orbital-bombardment-exploit-documented
and Respect to CCP for patching it out nice and quick.
Sex
(not sure if this is old news yet, ran a search and got nuthin) |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation
1946
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 01:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Damn! |
Thor Odinson42
Red Star. EoN.
55
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 01:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Props to them for not being homos and crushing everybody with it. |
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1966
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 01:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:Props to them for not being homos and crushing everybody with it. And for not posting it on the forums for all to see to abuse like some other corps we know. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S.
1097
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 01:51:00 -
[5] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Props to them for not being homos and crushing everybody with it. And for not posting it on the forums for all to see to abuse like some other corps we know. oh they posted it on the forums, but only after ccp patched it |
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1966
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 01:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
gbghg wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Props to them for not being homos and crushing everybody with it. And for not posting it on the forums for all to see to abuse like some other corps we know. oh they posted it on the forums, but only after ccp patched it It's strange - this is now the second piece of evidence that I.I. may actually be a good group of guys. My understanding of goons is starting to shake lol |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1199
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 01:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
Props to them.
However, this is the eve universe- they must be hiding something yet. |
Veritas Vitae
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
116
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 02:33:00 -
[8] - Quote
Wow, that could have been horribly abusive in pubs. |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
738
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 02:46:00 -
[9] - Quote
This is II's public service announcement on the subject. |
Bojo The Mighty
Bojo's School of the Trades
850
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 03:09:00 -
[10] - Quote
Are you rewarding someone for something they should do anyways? Just because they be gooning? Just question, no tone intended. |
|
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
738
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 03:11:00 -
[11] - Quote
They're being rewarded for doing something I doubt most of the other major corps would do. |
EKH0 0ne
Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 04:50:00 -
[12] - Quote
Yeah really well what about props to ekho one who made a day before II? The post gets moved, then i assume deleted because i cant find it anymore. Everyone doubts me in the thread saying yeah right thats impossible. Not a single thumbs up
The same night i post and after the devs obviously saw it because they moved the thread it gets fixed. and the credit is givin to someone who posts a video the day after...wow
Your welcome |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
740
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 04:52:00 -
[13] - Quote
EKH0 0ne wrote:Yeah really well what about props to ekho one who made a day before II? The post gets moved, then i assume deleted because i cant find it anymore. Everyone doubts me in the thread saying yeah right thats impossible. Not a single thumbs up
The same night i post and after the devs obviously saw it because they moved the thread it gets fixed. and the credit is givin to someone who posts a video the day after...wow
Your welcome
[citation needed] |
EKH0 0ne
Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 04:55:00 -
[14] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=675299#post675299 |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
740
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 05:42:00 -
[15] - Quote
You're silly. While usually I would applaud anyone reporting issues, your expression of dissatisfaction with lack of recognition is childish and makes me hesitant to support you at all, so I won't.
You want props for your thread being first?
It wasn't. The bug was discovered at least a couple of days before your thread was created and Immobile Infantry spent a few days testing and documenting it, while reporting their progress to CCP who were alerted directly immediately.
Starting a thread because you saw someone using it? Not quite the same thing as developing and reporting a software exploit.
What people are giving props for is II having a full understanding of the bug and using it responsibly. |
Rusty Shallows
Black Jackals
40
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 06:13:00 -
[16] - Quote
And to think if the actual method was kept secret CCP would have been forced to remove free orbitals from public matches. |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
19
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 06:18:00 -
[17] - Quote
EKH0 0ne wrote:Yeah really well what about props to ekho one who made a day before II? The post gets moved, then i assume deleted because i cant find it anymore. Everyone doubts me in the thread saying yeah right thats impossible. Not a single thumbs up
The same night i post and after the devs obviously saw it because they moved the thread it gets fixed. and the credit is givin to someone who posts a video the day after...wow
Your welcome
The glitch was discovered, explored, and reported before your thread. Please, don't be childish. What's important is that we found a glitch and it was fixed. Who found it and reported it doesn't matter, as it was reported and fixed, and not abused. Besides, it's not like CCP gave us Type II Assault BPOs in Yellow and Black stripes.
That'd be totally preferential treatment and completely impossible. |
sammus420
Immobile Infantry
40
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 06:22:00 -
[18] - Quote
Eltra Ardell wrote: The glitch was discovered, explored, and reported before your thread. Please, don't be childish. What's important is that we found a glitch and it was fixed. Who found it and reported it doesn't matter, as it was reported and fixed, and not abused. Besides, it's not like CCP gave us Type II Assault BPOs in Yellow and Black stripes.
I gotta admit, I was really hoping for those. We would have looked totally bad ass on the battlefield in them. |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
20
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 06:41:00 -
[19] - Quote
sammus420 wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote: The glitch was discovered, explored, and reported before your thread. Please, don't be childish. What's important is that we found a glitch and it was fixed. Who found it and reported it doesn't matter, as it was reported and fixed, and not abused. Besides, it's not like CCP gave us Type II Assault BPOs in Yellow and Black stripes.
I gotta admit, I was really hoping for those. We would have looked totally bad ass on the battlefield in them. Yeah, we'd have been the definition of chic, baby.
|
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
899
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 06:48:00 -
[20] - Quote
Guess you'll just have to be happy with the AUR CCP gave you for a reward. Good job we knew about eves Plex for snitches policy eh? ;) |
|
Corn In TheSkidmark
Backstabbers N Cheaters Union
84
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 07:14:00 -
[21] - Quote
Some people like to wear knee pads under desks I guess. Damn snitches. |
Kalante Schiffer
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
193
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 08:07:00 -
[22] - Quote
Veritas Vitae wrote:Wow, that could have been horribly abusive in pubs. yeah it could of had been, but this aint no cod where commentators say to their viewers on how to exploit a glitch and once the voice is heard more and more commentators get on the bandwagon and tell EVERYONE...next thing you know there is scrubs glitching all over the game, plus treyarch/infinity ward lack of f*cks given does not help the situation (even though they make billions off from their ******** sheep and commentators leeching from that youtube money who could not even afford a haircut if it was not for cod and its viewers which are 90% 9 year olds who think no scoping and hacking cod WaW is legit). CCP sure gets things done. |
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
94
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 08:07:00 -
[23] - Quote
cool story bro
Immobile Infantry got reported to CCP staff for bugusung and now they are doing damage mitigation by saying "they were doing tests" and taking credit for bugusing in pub matches.
the irony, just check this thread: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=676057#post676057 fact is sammus420 was doing it already for ages and they dared to ask "Do you have any proof to back up your claims?" and now they post the evidence by themself
pathetic... |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
744
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 08:27:00 -
[24] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:this is my point of view for this: Immobile Infantry got reported to CCP staff for bugusing and now they are doing damage mitigation by saying "they were doing tests" and taking credit for bugusing in pub matches. they were testing nothing, they only ruined the games of some poor new players in militia stuff. I saw sammus420 doing it several times in pub matches already last week and reported it accordingly... the irony, just check this thread: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=676057#post676057and they dared to ask "Do you have any proof to back up your claims?" and now they post the evidence by themself. if you want to test something, make a corp match instead of ruining the experience of new players
IDK if you're a student at D-UNI or better represent them but I read bullkitten like this and think less of them. There's public tweets between devs and Immobile Infantry, it was discussed in IRC, there's an easily visible conversation between the two and you're making things up because of some kind of anti-Goon agenda.
Why are you so dishonest? |
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
94
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 08:32:00 -
[25] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Jack McReady wrote:this is my point of view for this: Immobile Infantry got reported to CCP staff for bugusing and now they are doing damage mitigation by saying "they were doing tests" and taking credit for bugusing in pub matches. they were testing nothing, they only ruined the games of some poor new players in militia stuff. I saw sammus420 doing it several times in pub matches already last week and reported it accordingly... the irony, just check this thread: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=676057#post676057and they dared to ask "Do you have any proof to back up your claims?" and now they post the evidence by themself. if you want to test something, make a corp match instead of ruining the experience of new players IDK if you're a student at D-UNI or better represent them but I read bullkitten like this and think less of them. There's public tweets between devs and Immobile Infantry, it was discussed in IRC, there's an easily visible conversation between the two and you're making things up because of some kind of anti-Goon agenda. Why are you so dishonest? I only represent myself, also I specifically stated that this my point of view and if this is wrong then please answer those questions:
if they were testing something, please tell me why sammus was using it already last week, why have they used it in pub matches "for testing" when they could aswell make a corp match? as you can see in the thread I linked, I already knew about this before so I am not making up things. |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
744
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 08:59:00 -
[26] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:I only represent myself, also I specifically stated that this my point of view and if this is wrong then please answer those questions:
if they were testing something, please tell me why sammus420 was using it already last week, why have they used it in pub matches "for testing" when they could aswell make a corp match? and if it was for testing why was sammus420 teamkilling other players instead of his corpmates? as you can see in the thread I linked (which ironically is about II teamkilling others and you could provoke the bug via teamkilling), I already knew about this before so I am not making up things.
I'm not a Goon, nor can I speak for them, but I imagine any abuse of the exploit was the act of an individual.
I've seen Immobile Infantry leadership very clearly, after they immediately told CCP, pass on a "stop doing this". I've seen Cerebral Wolf dismiss the idea of sharing the exploit until it's fixed. I've seen internal discussion focused on fixing a gamebreaking bug and I've seen conversations between CCP and II focused on solving the problem.
|
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
96
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 09:45:00 -
[27] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Jack McReady wrote:I only represent myself, also I specifically stated that this my point of view and if this is wrong then please answer those questions:
if they were testing something, please tell me why sammus420 was using it already last week, why have they used it in pub matches "for testing" when they could aswell make a corp match? and if it was for testing why was sammus420 teamkilling other players instead of his corpmates? as you can see in the thread I linked (which ironically is about II teamkilling others and you could provoke the bug via teamkilling), I already knew about this before so I am not making up things. I'm not a Goon, nor can I speak for them, but I imagine any abuse of the exploit was the act of an individual. I've seen Immobile Infantry leadership very clearly, after they immediately told CCP, pass on a "stop doing this". I've seen Cerebral Wolf dismiss the idea of sharing the exploit until it's fixed. I've seen internal discussion focused on fixing a gamebreaking bug and I've seen conversations between CCP and II focused on solving the problem. EDIT: Also, +1 for the reasonable response to a fairly hostile post. I am always reasonable, even when I am hostile
this is my theory what actually really happened 1. some guys on II were teamkilling for fun or to punish afk people (sammus admitted it in the thread I linked that he was teamkilling) 2. during this they discovered this bug and had some fun with multiple orbitals (see the thead I linked, where I accused sammus of doing it and they asked me GÇPif I have any proofGÇ£) 3. the directors of II said to stop the teamkilling and discussed internally whats going on (again see the thread I linked were Cerebral Wolf said to stop it and discuss it internally) 4. the buguser shared the exploit with the directors 5. the directors decided to share it with CCP and claim the reward for something most likely several people already reported via the ticket system 6. II posts a thread about how it works and pretty much confirms my whole theory by posting the proof by themself.
I was randomly placed with sammus and his corp buddies into a pub match few times and saw him doing it, so that is why I guess it was actually him discovering it during a teamkilling spree and if you check the threads my theory makes a lot of sense from an outsiders point of view. Imho it does not matter if it was act of an individual, it is a difference if you have your own opinion or actually do something "bad" under the flag of someone else, II should take action and atleast apologize for someone in their corp ruining the matches of some poor players looking for fun but now the statement is "sorry bro, bad luck it was for testing, it is all fine" |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
745
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 10:06:00 -
[28] - Quote
Cool, you can have whatever timeline you like. Here's a sequence of events based on time stamped posts.
6 Apr - Cerebral Wolf @CCP_Nullarbor Where can i send you the video of that broken thing i told @RegnerBA about? We have some insane footage with 12 of them.
7 Apr 09:09 GMT Cerebral Wolf passes on a "stop doing that" from CCP who have been advised of the exploit.
7 Apr 19:28 GMT - Jack McReady sammus420 is know for bugusing, teamkilling, several orbital strikes in 30secs of game time and so on.
EXPLOIT GETS PATCHED.
8 Apr 19:57 GMT Cerebral Wolf makes public announcement.
...but you're totally welcome to think that despite allegedly being made aware of the issue by several parties CCP decided only to reward Immobile Infantry because something something "they claimed the reward". |
Vaerana Myshtana
Bojo's School of the Trades
668
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 10:19:00 -
[29] - Quote
Bojo The Mighty wrote:Are you rewarding someone for something they should do anyways? Just because they be gooning? Just question, no tone intended.
Yes, they should be reporting it anyway- but there is also the acknowledgement that they figured it out.
Discovering an exploit is worthy of praise, unless they, well... EXPLOIT it.
So it's good, pro-social behavior to laud those who figured out how to commit a crime and reported it to the authorities rather than farming it for all it's worth.
It is also the only way to avoid The Ban Hammer. |
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
96
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 10:29:00 -
[30] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote: ...but you're totally welcome to think that despite allegedly being made aware of the issue by several parties CCP decided only to reward Immobile Infantry because something something "they claimed the reward".
that is not my point, the point is, the bug was used by a II member in pub matches before it was passed over to CCP, you cant convince anyone that teamkilling other players in pub matches to benefit from a bugand slaugher the opposition via multiple orbital strikes is for GÇPtestingGÇ£. The players affected are only left with bad experience while II got rewarded.
Funny, according to your timeline I reported I reported sammus exploiting the bug the same day ( link ), where is my reward? Not my fault that CCP is too slow at reading my rants *trollface* |
|
Dexter Peabody
Immobile Infantry
37
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 10:34:00 -
[31] - Quote
what is this e-respect, i dont want it
yo ccp we want to un-report the bug please remove your patch |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
745
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 10:51:00 -
[32] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Mithridates VI wrote: ...but you're totally welcome to think that despite allegedly being made aware of the issue by several parties CCP decided only to reward Immobile Infantry because something something "they claimed the reward".
that is not my point, the point is, the bug was used by a II member in pub matches before it was passed over to CCP, you cant convince anyone that teamkilling other players in pub matches to benefit from a bugand slaugher the opposition via multiple orbital strikes is for GÇPtestingGÇ£. The players affected are only left with bad experience while II got rewarded. Funny, according to your timeline I reported I reported sammus exploiting the bug the same day ( link ), where is my reward? Not my fault that CCP is too slow at reading my rants *trollface* I haven't seen any evidence that it was used before being reported.
What is it with the people saying "I saw the exploit in use, I should get a reward."
There's a significant difference between being a victim of a software exploit and being the developer and reporter of one. |
xaerael Kabiel
Immobile Infantry
12
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:17:00 -
[33] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote: 2. during this they discovered this bug and had some fun with multiple orbitals (see the thead I linked, where I accused sammus of doing it and they asked me GÇPif I have any proofGÇ£, note that this case was already reported by me back then via the ticket system)
Not even bothering reading your post from this point on, because you're wrong at point two.
*I* thought of the potential for the bug. And when I thought of it, I was sat in a Gunnlogi, not exactly prime TKing material. We were at less than 1k WP.
We finished that match and went to work. We successfully pulled it off. We successfully replicated. We reported it.
No need for tin foil hat theories, you can admit we're the good guys, and play the game within it's intended parameters.
Like I said before, if we wanted to, we could have held onto this for a week or so and stomped the living hell out of corp matches. The method was VERY convoluted, and I doubt CCP would have found it in the 48 hours it took for them to patch it if we hadn't told them straight away. They probably would have had to gut the OB system and start over, but our honesty led them straight to the cause of the problem.
|
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
3025
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:18:00 -
[34] - Quote
As a quick note thank you to all who reported this to us directly and discreetly.
I would like to quickly point out that if anyone ever comes across any kind of security concern or exploit in the future please send an email to [email protected] and keep the following in mind:
- The Bad Example - User files a bug report that says, "You guys are idiots the whole thing is broken."
- The Good Example - User sends an email to [email protected] which reads "Dearest CCP Sreegs, I have come across a cross site scripting vulnerability in your forum. Here is some sample exploit code which I have used to prove my concept"
|
|
xaerael Kabiel
Immobile Infantry
12
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:26:00 -
[35] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:I reported I reported sammus exploiting the bug the same day ( link )
But you're not really reporting a bug... you're reporting a player for using a bug. Stop begging for asspats dude, be glad you were there to see one of the most dangerous bugs in action.
Thing about bugs is they have to be used to see if they work. Otherwise it's just an idea of a bug that might be there.
I'll reiterate, we could have used this to death, and it would have been very unlikely that anyone would have caught on how we were doing it. Instead, we used it a couple of times to verify it's existence, then a couple of times in orchestrated consentual corp matches to record it for CCP to see in action. |
Dexter Peabody
Immobile Infantry
37
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:37:00 -
[36] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Jack McReady wrote:I only represent myself, also I specifically stated that this my point of view and if this is wrong then please answer those questions:
if they were testing something, please tell me why sammus420 was using it already last week, why have they used it in pub matches "for testing" when they could aswell make a corp match? and if it was for testing why was sammus420 teamkilling other players instead of his corpmates? as you can see in the thread I linked (which ironically is about II teamkilling others and you could provoke the bug via teamkilling), I already knew about this before so I am not making up things. I'm not a Goon, nor can I speak for them, but I imagine any abuse of the exploit was the act of an individual. I've seen Immobile Infantry leadership very clearly, after they immediately told CCP, pass on a "stop doing this". I've seen Cerebral Wolf dismiss the idea of sharing the exploit until it's fixed. I've seen internal discussion focused on fixing a gamebreaking bug and I've seen conversations between CCP and II focused on solving the problem. EDIT: Also, +1 for the reasonable response to a fairly hostile post. I am always reasonable, even when I am hostile this is my theory what actually really happened 1. some guys on II were teamkilling for fun or to punish afk people (sammus admitted it in the thread I linked that he was teamkilling) 2. during this they discovered this bug and had some fun with multiple orbitals (see the thead I linked, where I accused sammus of doing it and they asked me GÇPif I have any proofGÇ£, note that this case was already reported by me back then via the ticket system) 3. the directors of II said to stop the teamkilling and discussed internally whats going on (again see the thread I linked were Cerebral Wolf said to stop it and discuss it internally) 4. the buguser shared the exploit with the directors 5. the directors decided to share it with CCP and claim the reward for something most likely several people already reported via the ticket system 6. CCP fixed the issue 7. II posts a thread about how it works and "confirms" my theory I was randomly placed with sammus and his corp buddies into a pub match few times and saw him doing it, so that is why I guess it was actually him discovering it during a teamkilling spree and if you check the threads my theory makes a lot of sense from an outsiders point of view (I dont know what was going on in the background that is why I can only assume). Imho it does not matter if it was act of an individual, it is a difference if you have your own opinion or actually do something "bad" under the flag of someone else, II should take action and atleast apologize for ruining the matches of some poor players looking for fun but now the statement is "sorry bro, bad luck it was for testing, it is all fine". I do not begrudge that they got reward for it but anyone that was actually affected and received bad game experience by their actions during the so called "testing" should also receive a reward because they in fact were part of the testing.
I read this as "wah wah I want attention too!"
You're in a public beta. You got hazed with an exploit that we, as beta testers, are here to find. Your timeline of events is hilariously wrong, by the way.
|
EKH0 0ne
Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:58:00 -
[37] - Quote
Dexter Peabody wrote:Jack McReady wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Jack McReady wrote:I only represent myself, also I specifically stated that this my point of view and if this is wrong then please answer those questions:
if they were testing something, please tell me why sammus420 was using it already last week, why have they used it in pub matches "for testing" when they could aswell make a corp match? and if it was for testing why was sammus420 teamkilling other players instead of his corpmates? as you can see in the thread I linked (which ironically is about II teamkilling others and you could provoke the bug via teamkilling), I already knew about this before so I am not making up things. I'm not a Goon, nor can I speak for them, but I imagine any abuse of the exploit was the act of an individual. I've seen Immobile Infantry leadership very clearly, after they immediately told CCP, pass on a "stop doing this". I've seen Cerebral Wolf dismiss the idea of sharing the exploit until it's fixed. I've seen internal discussion focused on fixing a gamebreaking bug and I've seen conversations between CCP and II focused on solving the problem. EDIT: Also, +1 for the reasonable response to a fairly hostile post. I am always reasonable, even when I am hostile this is my theory what actually really happened 1. some guys on II were teamkilling for fun or to punish afk people (sammus admitted it in the thread I linked that he was teamkilling) 2. during this they discovered this bug and had some fun with multiple orbitals (see the thead I linked, where I accused sammus of doing it and they asked me GÇPif I have any proofGÇ£, note that this case was already reported by me back then via the ticket system) 3. the directors of II said to stop the teamkilling and discussed internally whats going on (again see the thread I linked were Cerebral Wolf said to stop it and discuss it internally) 4. the buguser shared the exploit with the directors 5. the directors decided to share it with CCP and claim the reward for something most likely several people already reported via the ticket system 6. CCP fixed the issue 7. II posts a thread about how it works and "confirms" my theory I was randomly placed with sammus and his corp buddies into a pub match few times and saw him doing it, so that is why I guess it was actually him discovering it during a teamkilling spree and if you check the threads my theory makes a lot of sense from an outsiders point of view (I dont know what was going on in the background that is why I can only assume). Imho it does not matter if it was act of an individual, it is a difference if you have your own opinion or actually do something "bad" under the flag of someone else, II should take action and atleast apologize for ruining the matches of some poor players looking for fun but now the statement is "sorry bro, bad luck it was for testing, it is all fine". I do not begrudge that they got reward for it but anyone that was actually affected and received bad game experience by their actions during the so called "testing" should also receive a reward because they in fact were part of the testing. I read this as "wah wah I want attention too!" You're in a public beta. You got hazed with an exploit that we, as beta testers, are here to find. Your timeline of events is hilariously wrong, by the way.
I read this as a document of what actually happend.
II just some corp with a capture card. If anybody is crying for attention it is them. |
xaerael Kabiel
Immobile Infantry
12
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:24:00 -
[38] - Quote
EKH0 0ne wrote:
I read this as a document of what actually happend.
But his theory is so flawed, it hurts.
OK, I'll help you out....
He says we found the bug because we were teamkilling. Well, to drop an OB, and get the bug to work, you needed 2500wp. If we had that many WPs by the time you need them to pull the bug off, we were playing properly. Why would we start TKing EXACTLY at the moment we went just over 2500WP rather than dropping the orbital on some fools?
Flawed so hard it hurts. No one would go "hey, we got an orbital, let's go TK some redliner fools!!"
Sure, knowledge of the fact that TKing by grenade docks off 50 points from your total resulted in theorising that using that to dip under and over the 2500 threshold would produce the effect it did, but it was in no way "accidental". |
Dexter Peabody
Immobile Infantry
37
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:48:00 -
[39] - Quote
EKH0 0ne wrote:Dexter Peabody wrote:Jack McReady wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Jack McReady wrote:I only represent myself, also I specifically stated that this my point of view and if this is wrong then please answer those questions:
if they were testing something, please tell me why sammus420 was using it already last week, why have they used it in pub matches "for testing" when they could aswell make a corp match? and if it was for testing why was sammus420 teamkilling other players instead of his corpmates? as you can see in the thread I linked (which ironically is about II teamkilling others and you could provoke the bug via teamkilling), I already knew about this before so I am not making up things. I'm not a Goon, nor can I speak for them, but I imagine any abuse of the exploit was the act of an individual. I've seen Immobile Infantry leadership very clearly, after they immediately told CCP, pass on a "stop doing this". I've seen Cerebral Wolf dismiss the idea of sharing the exploit until it's fixed. I've seen internal discussion focused on fixing a gamebreaking bug and I've seen conversations between CCP and II focused on solving the problem. EDIT: Also, +1 for the reasonable response to a fairly hostile post. I am always reasonable, even when I am hostile this is my theory what actually really happened 1. some guys on II were teamkilling for fun or to punish afk people (sammus admitted it in the thread I linked that he was teamkilling) 2. during this they discovered this bug and had some fun with multiple orbitals (see the thead I linked, where I accused sammus of doing it and they asked me GÇPif I have any proofGÇ£, note that this case was already reported by me back then via the ticket system) 3. the directors of II said to stop the teamkilling and discussed internally whats going on (again see the thread I linked were Cerebral Wolf said to stop it and discuss it internally) 4. the buguser shared the exploit with the directors 5. the directors decided to share it with CCP and claim the reward for something most likely several people already reported via the ticket system 6. CCP fixed the issue 7. II posts a thread about how it works and "confirms" my theory I was randomly placed with sammus and his corp buddies into a pub match few times and saw him doing it, so that is why I guess it was actually him discovering it during a teamkilling spree and if you check the threads my theory makes a lot of sense from an outsiders point of view (I dont know what was going on in the background that is why I can only assume). Imho it does not matter if it was act of an individual, it is a difference if you have your own opinion or actually do something "bad" under the flag of someone else, II should take action and atleast apologize for ruining the matches of some poor players looking for fun but now the statement is "sorry bro, bad luck it was for testing, it is all fine". I do not begrudge that they got reward for it but anyone that was actually affected and received bad game experience by their actions during the so called "testing" should also receive a reward because they in fact were part of the testing. I read this as "wah wah I want attention too!" You're in a public beta. You got hazed with an exploit that we, as beta testers, are here to find. Your timeline of events is hilariously wrong, by the way. I read this as a document of what actually happend. II just some corp with a capture card. If anybody is crying for attention it is them. except its not and you're an idiot |
ca ronic
Moffit Bros
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 13:30:00 -
[40] - Quote
Looks to me like II is getting a little hostile because they got caught using the exploit. I probably would have had some fun with it before reporting it or until I got caught also. |
|
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
900
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 13:36:00 -
[41] - Quote
ca ronic wrote:Looks to me like II is getting a little hostile because they got caught using the exploit. I probably would have had some fun with it before reporting it or until I got caught also.
We're not hostile, the other guy is just an idiot. If you give me a sec i'll find the exact moment i reported it to SoxFour...
Quote:(5:05:12 PM) CerebralWolf: I've got something in Dust that's game breakingly bad (5:05:18 PM) CerebralWolf: We can have unlimited OB's per game
That was on the 6th, we had it for maybe a few hours before that and it's GMT fyi.
Also the reason we reported it right away was because we know CCP, if anyone had exploited it without reporting it they would lose their account.
What can i say, goons are smarter than pubbies i guess? |
xaerael Kabiel
Immobile Infantry
12
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 13:41:00 -
[42] - Quote
If we got "caught", why did CCP give us a really cool reward for finding the bug and reporting it straight away?
The response to this thread is funny. It's so obvious that people are jealous they didn't find the bug. The envy is so thick in here, you'd need a surgical scalpel to cut it. |
ca ronic
Moffit Bros
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 14:06:00 -
[43] - Quote
I havent read the whole thread, I do remember a couple days ago the guy comes on the forum and asks whats up, this guy is getting multliple orbitals. Next day CCP makes fixes the bug. I dont care. It really was a cool exploit, who wouldnt want to use it a few times? If you had already reported the bug, I still wouldnt call the guy an idiot, all he know is he brings up the issue then it gets fixed. |
xaerael Kabiel
Immobile Infantry
13
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 14:10:00 -
[44] - Quote
The problem is, we couldn't go public on the bug till after it was fixed, or everyone would have been trying to replicate it. We didn't want the game to descend each match into a race to 2500 WP, and the first past the post got to rule the match thereafter. If CCP hadn't been able to fix it so quickly, OBs probably would have had to be switched off.
Posting about it on the forums before it's fixed on anyone's part is really stupid. It lets everyone know there's a bug. including the ones who would abuse it. If you see a bug in action, report it and stay quiet. |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
900
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 14:18:00 -
[45] - Quote
But confirm you can replicate the bug first, otherwise you're just wasting everyones time. |
ca ronic
Moffit Bros
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 14:22:00 -
[46] - Quote
xaerael Kabiel wrote:The problem is, we couldn't go public on the bug till after it was fixed, or everyone would have been trying to replicate it. We didn't want the game to descend each match into a race to 2500 WP, and the first past the post got to rule the match thereafter. If CCP hadn't been able to fix it so quickly, OBs probably would have had to be switched off.
Posting about it on the forums before it's fixed on anyone's part is really stupid. It lets everyone know there's a bug. including the ones who would abuse it. If you see a bug in action, report it and stay quiet. I understand. Exposing it in the forums should get it fixed pretty fast, maybe one reason CCP did act so fast. I dont squad up much, didnt know you lost 50 points with a suicide. Still pretty clever who ever wondered if they could get two orbitals doing that. |
xaerael Kabiel
Immobile Infantry
13
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 14:33:00 -
[47] - Quote
ca ronic wrote:Still pretty clever who ever wondered if they could get two orbitals doing that.
It was me, so thanks! |
Kabuki Quantum
Immobile Infantry
5
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 14:51:00 -
[48] - Quote
We here at Immobile Infantry strive for excellence in every aspect of what we do. Be it our undying service and support of the gaming communities we belong to, to our exceptionally stringent and arduous training processes. Every Goon gives his or her all, simply to better everyone's gaming experience.
We ask not for thanks, but for everyone to do their part in helping make Dust 514 and its community a better place for generations to come. |
Severus Smith
L.O.T.I.S.
210
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 15:48:00 -
[49] - Quote
ca ronic wrote:I understand. Exposing it in the forums should get it fixed pretty fast, maybe one reason CCP did act so fast. I dont squad up much, didnt know you lost 50 points with a suicide. Still pretty clever who ever wondered if they could get two orbitals doing that. I'm an IT Security Officer in RL and Zero Day Exploits (publicly releasing exploit details before they are patched by the vendor) are NEVER EVER EVER, let me repeat EVER EVER EVER, ahem EVER a good idea. The fact that you wanted II to release one makes me want to beat you over the head with my ISC2 book.
I kid... but seriously, they're bad. |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
21
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 16:40:00 -
[50] - Quote
ca ronic wrote: Exposing it in the forums should get it fixed pretty fast, maybe one reason CCP did act so fast.
Nah, they called an emergency meeting pretty much right after CW told a dev in IRC. My petition EVE-side also got a very prompt response, too, including knowledge that they were fixing it. |
|
ca ronic
Moffit Bros
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:46:00 -
[51] - Quote
Severus Smith wrote:ca ronic wrote:I understand. Exposing it in the forums should get it fixed pretty fast, maybe one reason CCP did act so fast. I dont squad up much, didnt know you lost 50 points with a suicide. Still pretty clever who ever wondered if they could get two orbitals doing that. I'm an IT Security Officer in RL and Zero Day Exploits (publicly releasing exploit details before they are patched by the vendor) are NEVER EVER EVER, let me repeat EVER EVER EVER, ahem EVER a good idea. The fact that you wanted II to release one makes me want to beat you over the head with my ISC2 book. I kid... but seriously, they're bad. lol, okay. I get it. I probably would have done the same thing, thinking once everybody know about an exploit, it will no longer be an exploit.
I have a question sort of related. Is the sound related to the number of orbitals or is it inconsistent, for effect only. Seems like the number of "booms" is random, meaning some people might have been doing this for a long time, be almost impossible to catch them. |
sammus420
Immobile Infantry
40
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:51:00 -
[52] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote: I only represent myself, also I specifically stated that this my point of view and if this is wrong then please answer those questions:
if they were testing something, please tell me why was sammus420 using it already last week, why have they used it in pub matches "for testing" when they could aswell make a corp match? and if it was for testing why was sammus420 teamkilling other players instead of his corpmates? as you can see in my post in the thread I linked (the thread that ironically is about II teamkilling others and you could provoke the bug via teamkilling), I already knew about this before so I am not making up things, evidence is here.
Why was Sammus420 using it last week? Hmmmmmmmmmmm maybe it's because he was one of the people who origionally found it, and since we didn't share it with but a small handful of other goons and the devs, there weren't a lot of people we could test it with. Also, I only used the exploit 4 times, which not exactly the level of abuse you seem to think it was.
Why didn't we do multiple corp matches to test it? Because then we would have been forced to explain how the exploit is done to more people. Instead farming orbitals off pubbies is far easier, and carried less chance of people catching on to what was happening, as evidenced by the thread where people guessed wildly (and incorrectly) how we were doing it.
Why was I teamkilling other players instead of my corp mates? Well this is just lies and slander. Everyone in the Science Squad i was part of can attest that not only were we only killing each other in the squad, we were systematically killing each other to farm maximum orbitals as fast as possible. Grenade ganking pubbies would have slowed down that process.
As for the request for you to back up your claim in the other thread? Well, Goons like to see our names on stuff, and being called out by name is always hillarious to us. It lets us know we've left an impression who's calling us out. And I can tell from how many times you've used my name that I've left one on you.
|
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
22
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:00:00 -
[53] - Quote
I can confirm the most efficient way to perform the exploit is to gank your fellow squadmates. You then spawn on each other's drop uplinks to regain the points and kill each other again. 'tis great, clean fun. |
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
96
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:10:00 -
[54] - Quote
sammus420 wrote:Jack McReady wrote: I only represent myself, also I specifically stated that this my point of view and if this is wrong then please answer those questions:
if they were testing something, please tell me why was sammus420 using it already last week, why have they used it in pub matches "for testing" when they could aswell make a corp match? and if it was for testing why was sammus420 teamkilling other players instead of his corpmates? as you can see in my post in the thread I linked (the thread that ironically is about II teamkilling others and you could provoke the bug via teamkilling), I already knew about this before so I am not making up things, evidence is here.
Why was Sammus420 using it last week? Hmmmmmmmmmmm maybe it's because he was one of the people who origionally found it, and since we didn't share it with but a small handful of other goons and the devs, there weren't a lot of people we could test it with. Also, I only used the exploit 4 times, which not exactly the level of abuse you seem to think it was. Why didn't we do multiple corp matches to test it? Because then we would have been forced to explain how the exploit is done to more people. Instead farming orbitals off pubbies is far easier, and carried less chance of people catching on to what was happening, as evidenced by the thread where people guessed wildly (and incorrectly) how we were doing it. Why was I teamkilling other players instead of my corp mates? Well this is just lies and slander. Everyone in the Science Squad i was part of can attest that not only were we only killing each other in the squad, we were systematically killing each other to farm maximum orbitals as fast as possible. Grenade ganking pubbies would have slowed down that process. As for the request for you to back up your claim in the other thread? Well, Goons like to see our names on stuff, and being called out by name is always hillarious to us. It lets us know we've left an impression who's calling us out. And I can tell from how many times you've used my name that I've left one on you. because you cant use alt accounts for corp matches right? also I only remember you because you were the guy calling the orbitals... the sad part is, your score was nothing to brag about, even after the orbitals, your corp mates did all the work |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
2471
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:15:00 -
[55] - Quote
xaerael Kabiel wrote:why did CCP give us a really cool reward for finding the bug
Wait...what?
If so, that's BS; plenty of people have found and reported bugs, both severe and minor, and I'm fairly sure they've never been compensated for their trouble. |
BursegSardaukar
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
78
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:20:00 -
[56] - Quote
Excellent job with the reporting.
Who would have thought: beta testers testing things and reporting problems? |
Charizard Zakalwe
Immobile Infantry
27
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:22:00 -
[57] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:xaerael Kabiel wrote:why did CCP give us a really cool reward for finding the bug Wait...what? If so, that's BS; plenty of people have found and reported bugs, both severe and minor, and I'm fairly sure they've never been compensated for their trouble.
CCP gives out PLEX's for stuff like this in EVE. Maybe you should've asked nicely, or the scale of your bug wasn't on par with infinite, earth shattering orbitals.
Personally I'd like to see how CCP fixed the bug and how it lines up with what I figured they do. |
sammus420
Immobile Infantry
40
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:25:00 -
[58] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:because you cant use alt accounts for corp matches right? also I only remember you because you were the guy calling the orbitals... the sad part is, your score was nothing to brag about, even after the orbitals, your corp mates did all the work
Yes, let me and my science squad all boot up our multiple playstations, log into our mains and alts, set up a corp battle, and play multiple TVs all at once to test a bug. Because that's certainly easier than getting a tank, getting an orbital, then bombing each other. That makes a lot of sense.
Also judging by your little attempted insult at my score in a game where were were intentionally keeping low scores and suicide ganking to make the exploit work, I think you're upset.
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
2471
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:38:00 -
[59] - Quote
Charizard Zakalwe wrote:Maybe you should've asked nicely, or the scale of your bug wasn't on par with infinite, earth shattering orbitals.
Always with the assumptions that if I mention something, clearly I am the one suffering from it
These forums
Just an observation in general. Plenty of people are constantly submitting valid bug reports, I just find it silly to show favoritism towards any particular beta tester, is all. |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
24
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:49:00 -
[60] - Quote
They provide incentives to come forward with particularly grievous glitches, exploits, and problems, especially when they're hard to find or discover. Otherwise less-forthcoming players would sit on them and abuse them. This is nothing new. |
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
2472
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:51:00 -
[61] - Quote
Eltra Ardell wrote:This is nothing new.
If it's supposed to be an incentive, you'd think they'd actually share that with people, not just those who've been playing EVE for years |
Charizard Zakalwe
Immobile Infantry
28
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:52:00 -
[62] - Quote
It's your anecdote, you get included. Did any of these bugs warrant CCP coming into the officer onto the weekend to fix them? Maybe you'll get some free aur (and not some super high amount, it was like 22.50 worth per person. Enough for them to each buy a 2 30 Day Boosters. Big whoop.) then. Until you find such a bug then, and treat it like the goddamn nuclear launch codes, then maybe you'll get some stuff. Or maybe you won't. Whinging about it on the forums certainly won't you anything. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
2472
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:54:00 -
[63] - Quote
Who's whining?
It's an observation, kind of like my observation of how I.I. is pulling a PR campaign to turn their public image around, hence threads like this one
|
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
24
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:56:00 -
[64] - Quote
Goons have no public image. Any attempts are futile. Goons are goons, and will continue to act like goons. |
Charizard Zakalwe
Immobile Infantry
28
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:26:00 -
[65] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Who's whining? It's an observation, kind of like my observation of how I.I. is pulling a PR campaign to turn their public image around, hence threads like this one
You mean the thread that wasn't made by goons? |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
2476
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:31:00 -
[66] - Quote
Charizard Zakalwe wrote:You mean the thread that wasn't made by goons?
You're all in the same group, don't be coy. |
Charizard Zakalwe
Immobile Infantry
28
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:36:00 -
[67] - Quote
And what group would that be? |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
2476
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:39:00 -
[68] - Quote
Charizard Zakalwe wrote:And what group would that be?
Goons? Or whatever the whole group is called. You're allied, is that better? |
sammus420
Immobile Infantry
41
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:42:00 -
[69] - Quote
Actually we have zero history with the Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz, and had nothing to do with this thread. We're not allies, we don't hang out in the same chats, we have no contact with them at all to my knowledge. But I do think it's nice of them to recognize us as actual beta testers looking for bugs and stuff and not just people concerned about our K/D. But this is going off topic. |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
903
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:42:00 -
[70] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote:This is nothing new. If it's supposed to be an incentive, you'd think they'd actually share that with people, not just those who've been playing EVE for years It's all about doing your homework little pubbie man. I doubt any of the bugs that have been reported thus far in Dust have been on this scale. I'm sure other people will find them and use the Plex for Snitches route to get something out of it. In fact, i was very surprised by CCP's generosity but i think that's due to the nature of the bug that we found and how game breaking it could have been had it got into the wrong hands, someone like you in fact.
There's no point in you being butt hurt about it really, you could have been involved if you'd not left the corp. You was one of only a very small number of pubbies in the corp. |
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
2476
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:43:00 -
[71] - Quote
sammus420 wrote:Actually we have zero history with the Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz, and had nothing to do with this thread. We're not allies, we don't hang out in the same chats, we have no contact with them at all to my knowledge. But I do think it's nice of them to recognize us as actual beta testers looking for bugs and stuff and not just people concerned about our K/D. But this is going off topic.
Aside from them being in your chat channels |
Eltra Ardell
Immobile Infantry
24
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:44:00 -
[72] - Quote
If we're in the same group as PFBH, then they'll have no problem giving me the ISK I need to run Proto suits, right? |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
903
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:45:00 -
[73] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Charizard Zakalwe wrote:And what group would that be? Goons? Or whatever the whole group is called. You're allied, is that better?
Don't play stupid, you was in II up till about 2 months ago. You know we've nothing to do with PFBHz.. you're just trying to **** stir for some reason. |
Martin Short Man
DUST University Ivy League
10
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 20:10:00 -
[74] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Charizard Zakalwe wrote:And what group would that be? Goons? Or whatever the whole group is called. You're allied, is that better? Don't play stupid, you was in II up till about 2 months ago. You know we've nothing to do with PFBHz.. you're just trying to **** stir for some reason. The groups that was in our chat channels in the past was Betamax and Seraphim but that's all changed and going back about 6 months for SI and 3 weeks for betamax.
Oh so it's an I.I. alt in PFBHz.
Well, it was good on you guys anyway for doing your job as beta testers and reporting a bug, but the bragging on your reward really over shadows any good you have done in the eyes of most.
Minus-1 |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
903
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 20:14:00 -
[75] - Quote
We don't want you're respect or your love, we want to rub your nose in it because we can. |
ca ronic
Moffit Bros
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 20:18:00 -
[76] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:We don't want you're respect or your love, we want to rub your nose in it because we can. Its got to be really bugging anybody who was using the exploit and not reporting it. They cant claim they found it first. So keep on bragging. |
Sextus Hardcock
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
148
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 20:19:00 -
[77] - Quote
confirming I am the Dust alt of The Mittani :P
PS
A lot of the people posting in what was to be a simple pat on the back to II (whether they like it or not lol) and a heads up to everyone else, have proven themselves to be complete b!tches. I look forward to helping crush your corps, ravage your districts and drink your sweet tears.
Sex |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
903
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 21:22:00 -
[78] - Quote
Sextus Hardcock wrote:confirming I am the Dust alt of The Mittani :P
PS
A lot of the people posting in what was to be a simple pat on the back to II (whether they like it or not lol) and a heads up to everyone else, have proven themselves to be complete b!tches. I look forward to helping crush your corps, ravage your districts and drink your sweet tears.
Sex I like this post. |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
755
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 22:12:00 -
[79] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:because you cant use alt accounts for corp matches right? also I only remember you because you were the guy calling the orbitals... the sad part is, your score was nothing to brag about, even after the orbitals, your corp mates did all the work
I was hoping there was some legitimate criticism of II's behaviour in here so I could run the other side of the story... but there's a bunch of evidence to support their arguments. Some contested details which there is no evidence for... and no evidence for your side...
Then you go and say things like this which make it seem like you have an agenda. |
Martin Short Man
DUST University Ivy League
11
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 22:29:00 -
[80] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:We don't want you're respect or your love, we want to rub your nose in it because we can.
This^^ |
|
xaerael Kabiel
Immobile Infantry
18
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 22:33:00 -
[81] - Quote
I'm actually getting irritated by the Dust uni people in here, which is sad because I'm Ex EUni when I played Eve a few years back, and have very little bad to say about them. I also joined on recommendation from a goon in the absence of me having an active forum account to join GF. I spent a lot of time after leaving for other things in the help channel helping out newbies.
Dust Uni seems to be a bunch of self entitled brats. It's sort of heartbreaking to see EUni's name being spoiled in my eyes by there paranoid posts and crying. From what I remember there was a zero tol policy on this sort of nonsense in EUni, and being like this got you the boot faster than piracy. |
Kevall Longstride
DUST University Ivy League
168
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 22:35:00 -
[82] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:gbghg wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Props to them for not being [annoying people] and crushing everybody with it. And for not posting it on the forums for all to see to abuse like some other corps we know. oh they posted it on the forums, but only after ccp patched it It's strange - this is now the second piece of evidence that I.I. may actually be a good group of guys. My understanding of goons is starting to shake lol
I would also like to thank the II for the discovery and subsequent removal of this potentially game killing exploit and to make a further point, at the risk of destroying that carefully cultivated reputation.
Out of the game, all the goons I've met have all been good people to meet and talk to. And dare I say it, have a drink with.
Sorry if that's burst a few bubbles. |
xaerael Kabiel
Immobile Infantry
18
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 22:38:00 -
[83] - Quote
Ok, my faith's been restored a little. phew! |
Kevall Longstride
DUST University Ivy League
168
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 22:53:00 -
[84] - Quote
xaerael Kabiel wrote:Ok, my faith's been restored a little. phew!
Your welcome o7
|
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
755
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 23:00:00 -
[85] - Quote
If anyone has another side to the story which can be backed up by more than bias against Immobile Infantry, I'd be keen to see it to add another perspective to my current story on them at dust411.com. |
Crash Monster
Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:42:00 -
[86] - Quote
To the naysayers, I have to say I was in a battle or two where there seemed to be a lot of OB's on the go... I sure as heck didn't sit around QQ'ing over it but I did do a bit more running away from prime real estate when I heard it.
Of course, I don't know who seemed to be earning all the OB's or how, and I didn't really give it a second thought.
Kudo's on reporting it, documenting it, and even giving us a video for amusement. That's an awesome way to help CCP see the problem and devise a fix. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |