Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
142
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 13:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
"What we are adding in the next release, thanks to the supreme efforts of CCP Nullabor, is a quality graphic so that when looking at battles in the battle finder you get an idea of what your connection speed to the battle is"
is that per server?
or per player?
if you make it per player, make sure you add in vote to kick or it's useless.
still, good 2 hear.
Peace B |
Logi Blade
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
13
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 13:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
Do not add the infamous over abused "Vote to kick" or many will leave. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
472
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 13:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
I know people I'd vote to kick, and it as nothing to do with ping times. |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
144
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 14:42:00 -
[4] - Quote
V2K has to be in.
If it's not, then this game is f'ed
leaving V2K out and FF off will kill this game faster then anything else.
Peace B |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1893
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 14:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
V2K is a stupid idea in this kind of game.
And I'm pretty confident that, given the context, any ping rating will be for YOUR connection quality to that battle server (which matters more than an individual player's ping anyway) rather than showing everyone's ping. |
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
1135
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 14:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:V2K has to be in.
If it's not, then this game is f'ed
leaving V2K out and FF off will kill this game faster then anything else.
Peace B
Not sure we need vote to kick. What we really need though is the ability for directors to kick people from corporation matches. This becomes more important as corporation matches become more relevant, important, and you get the ability to bring none-corp members into corp matches.
I think a lot of these kind of features, ability to kick and friendly fire, |
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
121
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 15:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
V2K gets abused to **** in every game
In pub matches V2K would be useless because you would prob get another useless player in anyways, and since its high sec pub matches it really doesnt matter if you win or lose or whatever because both sides will be **** anyways
V2K will only have its place in corp matches where you need ppl to what needs to be done and if they dont boot em and get someone else in who can do the job |
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
1140
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 15:09:00 -
[8] - Quote
Responding to the OP though:
BASSMEANT wrote:"What we are adding in the next release, thanks to the supreme efforts of CCP Nullabor, is a quality graphic so that when looking at battles in the battle finder you get an idea of what your connection speed to the battle is"
is that per server?
or per player?
if you make it per player, make sure you add in vote to kick or it's useless.
still, good 2 hear.
Peace B
When we do add any kind of ping or latency meter it will probably be in the battle finder for matches that are not of the instant battle variety and will be your connection to the battle server that battle is being hosted on.
So this will be relevant to any custom matches we host for special events, factional warfare battles, and corporation battles. |
|
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
145
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 15:16:00 -
[9] - Quote
1. V2K is ABSOLUTELY needed in team games. You guys are already dodgin out of it? seriously? damn. that's too bad.
2. Match ping doesn't matter. What matters is PLAYER PING rating. Who cares if a match is crappy. We need to know WHO is draggin the match down with their lag. All the players in the match should have a ping rating = green yellow or red. then you combine V2K with a red ping rating and suddenly the match is green.
please don't tell me you're gonna protect the casuals with the lack of V2K.
that's just a stupid f'ing move.
Peace B |
Takahiro Kashuken
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
122
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 15:27:00 -
[10] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:Gibberish
Peace B Not sure we need vote to kick. What we really need though is the ability for directors to kick people from corporation matches. This becomes more important as corporation matches become more relevant, important, and you get the ability to bring none-corp members into corp matches.I think a lot of these kind of features, ability to kick and friendly fire,
Casual player in a casual clan complaining that he cant V2K ppl out of a casual high sec pubbie game which has no impact on anything
CCP dev highlighted in bold wants V2K to be actually useful |
|
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
393
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 15:35:00 -
[11] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:V2K has to be in.
If it's not, then this game is f'ed
leaving V2K out and FF off will kill this game faster then anything else.
Peace B Not sure we need vote to kick. What we really need though is the ability for directors to kick people from corporation matches. This becomes more important as corporation matches become more relevant, important, and you get the ability to bring none-corp members into corp matches. I think a lot of these kind of features, ability to kick and friendly fire, DING DING DING...we have a winner |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1895
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 15:46:00 -
[12] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:1. V2K is ABSOLUTELY needed in team games like dust. You guys are already dodgin out of it? seriously? damn. that's too bad. you're gonna end up forcing a buncha new players to be saddled with either useless players, afk'ers or worse, redline camp snipers. not to mention the einsteins who jump in other peoples vehicle drops. No man... there is no abuse of V2K. that's just an excuse that average players use to get out from under the kick. if you're a good player, you're not threaened by it. if you're a bad player, hell yeah you're scared. better get better. fast.
2. Match ping doesn't matter. What matters is PLAYER PING rating. Who cares if a match is crappy. We need to know WHO is draggin the match down with their lag. All the players in the match should have a ping rating = green yellow or red. then you combine V2K with a red ping rating and suddenly the match is green.
please don't tell me you're gonna protect the casuals with the lack of V2K.
that's just a stupid f'ing move.
Peace B Good luck to those "casuals" getting into a game that has any influence on corp battles.
And good luck using V2K because one of the other team's best is out-of-region and has a higher ping. He's going to lag out the match! (pro-tip: That's not how server-side almost everything works anyway) Kick him! Uhhh... no. He's part of OUR team, not YOURS. Look after your own people, maybe?
Your ping to the BATTLE SERVER is what will have the most impact on your play experience when movement tracking and hit detection are handled server-side. If you have great ping, and another guy's sitting at 8000 or something (that's not milliseconds any more. That's just REGULAR SECONDS), then he's going to be showing up on your screen pretty consistently in the exact place THE SERVER says he is. When you aim at where the server says he is, your shots will hit. He won't see you, because he'll be looking for where you had been 8 seconds earlier when the server sent its last message updating him on your location, but you'll see where he actually IS, and you'll aim where he actually IS, according to the server, and when your shots hit, he'll find out that he died 8 seconds after you're done with him.
Yes, that's an extreme (to the point of "you can't get broadband that slow") example. But you can see the point. |
Midas Man ll
Talon Strike Force LTD Sleepless Knights Alliance
51
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 15:51:00 -
[13] - Quote
Yes to Ping, No to V2K,
All we will see with V2K is the elitists booting everyone from there team just before the match expires so they get all the spoils of war for themselves, this happens in every game that V2k is included in. And as DUST is currently riddled with exploiters this will ruin the experience for everyone else. |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
145
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 15:54:00 -
[14] - Quote
i know all about hit detection and server side vs client side.
that's not a pro tip, it's just common knowledge.
and hell yeah he should be kicked for laggin.
as well as:
1. useless micless players 2. camp snipers 3. kids 4. basically anyone who doesn't know what they are doing.
you guys are all montessori about it now.
bet you'll be singin a different tune when the time comes.
you think i'm a casual gamer?
you must be new here.
Peace B |
Yagihige
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
194
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 15:58:00 -
[15] - Quote
What about useful micless players?
Can't i play without a mic now? |
Takahiro Kashuken
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
123
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 16:00:00 -
[16] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:i know all about hit detection and server side vs client side.
that's not a pro tip, it's just common knowledge.
and hell yeah he should be kicked for laggin.
as well as:
1. useless micless players 2. camp snipers 3. kids 4. basically anyone who doesn't know what they are doing.
you guys are all montessori about it now.
bet you'll be singin a different tune when the time comes.
you think i'm a casual gamer?
you must be new here.
Peace B
Casual player in a casual clan complaining that he cant V2K ppl out of a casual high sec pubbie game which has no impact on anything
|
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
440
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 16:24:00 -
[17] - Quote
Claiming VTK doesn't get abused is disingenuous, especially for anybody who comes out of MAG. That's where I learned that the primary use of VTK is poops'n'giggles.
In thinking about VTK, it seems that the mechanics for hisec pubs and losec corp battles definitely need to be different.
There's separate legit issues at play - ping, teamkilling, non-participation, poor player stats, working against the team, etc.
Can one mechanism justly address all these issues? |
Lasarte Ioni
Noob Gaming
73
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 16:34:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ok, we got it, we are playing YOUR game so even if everyone sees you are an elitist scum that plays pubs because "atm CB are meaningless", you will continue to play pub matches just to roll over noobs and ofc you want to be able to bring your squad in and get control over the match, not as a player but as some kind of admin (BF3 admins anyone? ) well, i'm sorry to tell you, the game isn't yours and if you don't like a pub match BREAKING NEWS! YOU can leave it w/o needing a single vote! how awesome is that! but probably you can't even lose 10 mins worth of SP can you? |
Zekain Kade
BetaMax.
955
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 16:37:00 -
[19] - Quote
I want a vote to kill" option :) |
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
1147
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 16:48:00 -
[20] - Quote
Zekain Kade wrote:I want a vote to kill" option :)
OK now THIS I can get behind. The kill though should come in the form of a pink laser from orbit. Just so everyone who sees him die knows it was due to the vote. Need to emphasis it to EVERYONE. :D |
|
|
MORTADEL0
Grupo de Asalto Chacal CRONOS.
48
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 16:52:00 -
[21] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:V2K has to be in.
If it's not, then this game is f'ed
leaving V2K out and FF off will kill this game faster then anything else.
Peace B Not sure we need vote to kick. What we really need though is the ability for directors to kick people from corporation matches. This becomes more important as corporation matches become more relevant, important, and you get the ability to bring none-corp members into corp matches. I think a lot of these kind of features, ability to kick and friendly fire,
yes, please https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=59419&find=unread
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1898
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 16:54:00 -
[22] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Zekain Kade wrote:I want a vote to kill" option :) OK now THIS I can get behind. The kill though should come in the form of a pink laser from orbit. Just so everyone who sees him die knows it was due to the vote. Need to emphasis it to EVERYONE. :D Relevant. Again.
Please make that show up right before the end-game stats page if someone got vote-killed by unanimous agreement from their entire team? Or have it pop up every time anyone gets vote-killed, just to make the reason REALLY clear... |
steadyhand amarr
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
342
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 17:09:00 -
[23] - Quote
CONCORD ASSASSIN just sayin |
Kushmir Nadian
Valor Coalition RISE of LEGION
80
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 17:39:00 -
[24] - Quote
I've always played games with with VTK as well, hell I got voted out of my first SOCOM game for shooting a friendly (and rightfully so) I didnt cry about it because I was DEAD WRONG. Some of you need to let go of the butt-hurt about getting kicked in your gaming past.
That said, Dust is a different animal. As long as we have the option to boot saboteurs from corp battles and other large scale Null-sec engagements it should be fine.
High sec is where guys are supposed to learn. VTK on a guy because he sucks isnt going to make him better. And as long as we have good grouping tools we can form our squads outside of matches and won't need to kick for a friend.
I REPEAT: As long as we have good grouping tools. |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
441
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 17:39:00 -
[25] - Quote
steadyhand amarr wrote:CONCORD ASSASSIN just sayin +1. Would be so very cool to see the assasin coming - i'd start teamkilling just for the thrill of getting hunted down ;) |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3039
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 17:41:00 -
[26] - Quote
no to VTK if anything the server would be the deciding factor of dropping a player who's latency is high enough to longer have a good connection. |
Captain-Awesome
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
355
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 17:45:00 -
[27] - Quote
bassment, your reasons to kick are pretty stupid.
if someone is lagging, it's not their fault, if someone is afk, they may come back - there's already an auto boot.
logic = flawed. I'd vote to kick you every game just because I could. |
Dusters Blog
Galactic News Network
143
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 17:56:00 -
[28] - Quote
Vrain Matari wrote:steadyhand amarr wrote:CONCORD ASSASSIN just sayin +1. Would be so very cool to see the assasin coming - i'd start teamkilling just for the thrill of getting hunted down ;)
we'd actually like to see defective [teamkilling] clones get deactivated like they were in Templar One. would fit better into the lore. auto boot them after 3 friendly team kills or 6 friendly 'assists'. |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
146
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 18:06:00 -
[29] - Quote
man... you guys can't possibly be this blind:
you're forcing folks to play lumped up together. you're wondering why the "game is so hard"? you have teams wtih 1 squad and 12 randoms with no mics.
and you think my reasoning is off?
i give you about 3 to 6 months post retail and people will be begging for V2K.
but that is all off topic and i'll split the diff and take half for actually engaging in that.
ping rating is a legit issue:
most of you must not be old enough to remember how bf2 worked. and it did work. because the cat with the red ping rating (which IS his fault actually, get some better service) ends up shunned. and then when you get all the red ping people out of the regular servers, they can all STILL go and play on a server with each other. nobody is stopping them from playing.
they shouldn't be playing with the green ping players. that's just the way it is.
you guys are still trying to figure out how to keep things "fair". there is no such thing as fair after kindergarten.
put in a player ping rating for a couple months and if you don't like it take it back out. it's a not a game changer in the sense of balance or mechanics. once you have it in there, nobody is gonna want it out.
Peace B |
Nstomper
Th3-ReSiStAnCe-SEC.0
206
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 18:26:00 -
[30] - Quote
no **** v2k we dont need an option to make the game easier for people , i never once liked games that cater to noobs , eve is suppossed to be a cruel universe isnt it? voting to kick bad players just so you can invite good players and have your team win isnt going to work any where except for corp matches , so if ccp were to add it i hope they only add it to corp matches and not matches with random people |
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
123
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 18:35:00 -
[31] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:man... you guys can't possibly be this blind:
you're forcing folks to play lumped up together. you're wondering why the "game is so hard"? you have teams wtih 1 squad and 12 randoms with no mics.
and you think my reasoning is off?
i give you about 3 to 6 months post retail and people will be begging for V2K.
but that is all off topic and i'll split the diff and take half for actually engaging in that.
ping rating is a legit issue:
most of you must not be old enough to remember how bf2 worked. and it did work. because the cat with the red ping rating (which IS his fault actually, get some better service) ends up shunned. and then when you get all the red ping people out of the regular servers, they can all STILL go and play on a server with each other. nobody is stopping them from playing.
they shouldn't be playing with the green ping players. that's just the way it is.
you guys are still trying to figure out how to keep things "fair". there is no such thing as fair after kindergarten.
put in a player ping rating for a couple months and if you don't like it take it back out. it's a not a game changer in the sense of balance or mechanics. once you have it in there, nobody is gonna want it out.
Peace B
Casual player in a casual clan complaining that he cant V2K ppl out of a casual high sec pubbie game which has no impact on anything
Yet he calls us blind |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
146
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 18:38:00 -
[32] - Quote
V2K isn't for noobs?
wtf is wrong with you people?
V2K is used by team players to make sure the team is a team:
when you have 6 snipers not doing anything useful, you kick em... like the complaints on the other threads.
when you have someone jump in your tank and drive off you kick em... like the complaints on the other threads.
when you have a guy sitting still in the mcc for 3 minutes you kick em... like the complaints from the other threads.
same thing for the racists, the micless cluess morons who just won't try and don't get it and are only draning your teams tickets.
AND for the guy with the red ping bar that whenever her shows up the server goes to hell and you know who he is because now that they coded the ping bar into the game, you get used to seeing who is and isn't running a good connection and you end up memorizing the guys with the bad ones on sight and so at the beginning of the match you hear someone on team channel go "ohhhhhh jeez it's Wally Whathisnuts and his red ping bar... get him outta here folks" and then everyone chuckles and agrees. and suddenly the games stop lagging as much.
you guys are used to lag because most of you are under 30 and never experienced the ping bar/v2k.
you DID experience V2K in the hands of a buncha kids and that was during mag, but was a failed game and it failed for the very reason that it catered to and protected the casuals and hamstrung all the teams until the game died.
and that's what ccp is starting to do over here. like i said:
builid the ping rating into the system since it's not a mechanics issue and ask the community if they want it out.
dollar sez they won't
as per the V2K issue, like i said, give it a few months post retail and once you guys start feeding money into the meter then you'l beggin for V2K.
Peace B |
Takahiro Kashuken
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
124
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 18:46:00 -
[33] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:V2K isn't for noobs?
wtf is wrong with you people?
V2K is used by team players to make sure the team is a team:
when you have 6 snipers not doing anything useful, you kick em... like the complaints on the other threads.
when you have someone jump in your tank and drive off you kick em... like the complaints on the other threads.
when you have a guy sitting still in the mcc for 3 minutes you kick em... like the complaints from the other threads.
same thing for the racists, the micless cluess morons who just won't try and don't get it and are only draning your teams tickets.
AND for the guy with the red ping bar that whenever her shows up the server goes to hell and you know who he is because now that they coded the ping bar into the game, you get used to seeing who is and isn't running a good connection and you end up memorizing the guys with the bad ones on sight and so at the beginning of the match you hear someone on team channel go "ohhhhhh jeez it's Wally Whathisnuts and his red ping bar... get him outta here folks" and then everyone chuckles and agrees. and suddenly the games stop lagging as much.
you guys are used to lag because most of you are under 30 and never experienced the ping bar/v2k.
you DID experience V2K in the hands of a buncha kids and that was during mag, but was a failed game and it failed for the very reason that it catered to and protected the casuals and hamstrung all the teams until the game died.
and that's what ccp is starting to do over here. like i said:
builid the ping rating into the system since it's not a mechanics issue and ask the community if they want it out.
dollar sez they won't
as per the V2K issue, like i said, give it a few months post retail and once you guys start feeding money into the meter then you'l beggin for V2K.
Peace B
Casual player in a casual clan complaining that he cant V2K ppl out of a casual high sec pubbie game which has no impact on anything |
DeeJay One
BetaMax.
10
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 18:49:00 -
[34] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:
Not sure we need vote to kick. What we really need though is the ability for directors to kick people from corporation matches. This becomes more important as corporation matches become more relevant, important, and you get the ability to bring none-corp members into corp matches.
I think a lot of these kind of features, ability to kick and friendly fire,
Kicking a player from a corp match should follow the disable clone "feature" from the lore. If you let a saboteur into your match, you can disable his remaining clones, but it should leave the player slot occupied and not to be taken by someone else. We have to keep backstabbing a viable option;-) |
Nstomper
Th3-ReSiStAnCe-SEC.0
206
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 18:53:00 -
[35] - Quote
lmao that takahiro guy is killing me |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
149
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 23:18:00 -
[36] - Quote
"voting to kick bad players just so you can invite good players "
oh yeah i see my problem:
i thought you guys were smart.
my mistake.
oh and 1 more thing:
if the matches don't count, as you say, then why should it matter who plays?
why SHOULDN'T folks be able to kick out the bad players and keep the good ones? you said it didn't matter... so lets cut it the other way: put in the V2K and it won't hurt anyone because like you said, kicking em outta matches that don't matter won't matter.
you guys are clueless, seriously.
my guess is some of you were kicked for being garbagey type players and thus are trying not to relive the experience of being kicked again.
like i said, once the game goes retail and enough folks lose out on money they spent because they got stuck in rooms with a buncha shipdits that cost em money... like real i spent money on stuff money... folks will want it.
especially in null.
if you don't have V2K in null with FF on, holy hell are you opening a can of worms.
if you don't have FF on in null, then really... you don't have a game.
Peace B |
Panther Alpha
Onikanabo Brigade Caldari State
99
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 23:24:00 -
[37] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:"voting to kick bad players just so you can invite good players "
oh yeah i see my problem:
i thought you guys were smart.
my mistake.
oh and 1 more thing:
if the matches don't count, as you say, then why should it matter who plays?
why SHOULDN'T folks be able to kick out the bad players and keep the good ones? you said it didn't matter... so lets cut it the other way: put in the V2K and it won't hurt anyone because like you said, kicking em outta matches that don't matter won't matter.
you guys are clueless, seriously.
my guess is some of you were kicked for being garbagey type players and thus are trying not to relive the experience of being kicked again.
like i said, once the game goes retail and enough folks lose out on money they spent because they got stuck in rooms with a buncha shipdits that cost em money... like real i spent money on stuff money... folks will want it.
especially in null.
if you don't have V2K in null with FF on, holy hell are you opening a can of worms.
if you don't have FF on in null, then really... you don't have a game.
Peace B
Talk me one single game where V2K really works ?
Is a waste of time. To make it fair you'll need 50% of votes to kick some one, that never happens.
I think CCP will be better off improving other areas of the game, or adding useful things. V2K is useless.
|
Quill Killian
Better Hide R Die
115
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 00:07:00 -
[38] - Quote
Hmm. It'd be really interesting if CCP enabled a "ping" system, and a lot of the players who thought they were the "elite green" actually found out they were more yellow and red. |
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
290
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 00:18:00 -
[39] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:1. V2K is ABSOLUTELY needed in team games like dust. You guys are already dodgin out of it? seriously? damn. that's too bad. you're gonna end up forcing a buncha new players to be saddled with either useless players, afk'ers or worse, redline camp snipers. not to mention the einsteins who jump in other peoples vehicle drops. No man... there is no abuse of V2K. that's just an excuse that average players use to get out from under the kick. if you're a good player, you're not threaened by it. if you're a bad player, hell yeah you're scared. better get better. fast.
This is the attitude which causes people to say V2K is abused to begin with.
So, you can kick new players who you don't think are good? People who snipe? Who's gonna replace them?
Oh look, another random. Kick. Oh look, another. Kick. Oh another. Kick. I hate that guy. Kick. I hate his corp. Kick. I don't know that guy. Kick. A sniper. Kick. Never heard of him. Kick. A newberry tanker with only militia tanks. Kick. Another sniper. Kick. Grenade spammer. Kick.
You and the others voting will be kicking players all match trying to get good players in, leaving the rest of your team to fight the match without you. Which makes you even worse than a redline sniper.
Not only that, by kicking people you are taking away from their gameplay experience just for the sake of your own. Better match making is all we need, V2K does nothing but promote douchebaggery. And there is enough of that already.
Most importantly, since these battles are not paid for by you, but by an NPC entity (Blood Raiders, Mordu's Legion, Templis Dragonaurs, etc.), no other merc hired by said entity should have the right to cancel a contract that another randomly selected player has accepted to fight that match for that NPC entity. The cancellation of such a contract would have to be up to the NPC entity itself, meaning the match making needs to be fixed. |
Sextus Hardcock
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
91
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 00:28:00 -
[40] - Quote
Two words for you: Meta Game
V2K in New Eden... yah that won't be abused.
I am in support of pink space lazers |
|
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
290
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 00:28:00 -
[41] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Zekain Kade wrote:I want a vote to kill" option :) OK now THIS I can get behind. The kill though should come in the form of a pink laser from orbit. Just so everyone who sees him die knows it was due to the vote. Need to emphasis it to EVERYONE. :D I.... could see that. Only twice per person per match though. And it can't be done when they are driving a vehicle, that would just be a way to grief tankers and what not (they are a whiny bunch, but even I can see that would easily be abused). It would be a good deterrent for those people sniping with Thales from the redline or those douche's running full proto gear with officer weapons in a pub match against total newberries. You're gonna steal all the kills by playing dirty? You're gonna lose a couple Balacs in the process.
(Only kidding about the proto gear bit.... well..... sort of kidding) |
Thog A Kuma
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
25
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 01:41:00 -
[42] - Quote
I kinda liked the idea of V2K until I read what some of you would want to do with it. How in hell is a n00b supposed to learn how to play if people think they are entitled to only play with "good" players?
Voting to kick redline snipers is silly, designing a game so redline sniping is discouraged or not profitable is not silly. the.
There are 6 snipers on the team? kick them? how many snipers are acceptable to you sir? CCP gave us sniper rifles but don't dare use them because you'll get kicked. or is it 2 guys are sniping already so nobody else is allowed to snipe?
Someone is AFK in the MCC (I sympathize with the desire to kick) a better solution is probs to have a MCC timer not distracting everyone. ever get those notices that the server will be going down for routine maintenance in a firefight?
When did Mic posession become mandatory? I have a Mic, it works, I use it, most non corp-squad games I play are totally silent or some random Mic bumping noises. the loud kiddies are easy to deal with just mute the freak.
In short, never give random people a power you wouldn't give an enemy. I'd never voluntarily give an enemy the chance to kick me or even disturb my game playing experience. |
From Costa Rica
Grupo de Asalto Chacal CRONOS.
69
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 04:10:00 -
[43] - Quote
1. I am doing my best and i mean MY BEST to play nice and not directly attack the OP, its hard you know.
2. V2K always a bad idea, just go to a private server on BT3 and you will see what giving power to (trying to find a nicer word for idiots) some people does. Its like giving a nuke to a monkey. YOU JUST DON-ŠT
3. The ping thing actually sound good, just to see if joining a game in singapour could affect your gameplay.
4. Just lock this treat already, because i foresee it going really wrong really fast.
|
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2378
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 07:15:00 -
[44] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:man... you guys can't possibly be this blind:
you're forcing folks to play lumped up together. you're wondering why the "game is so hard"? you have teams wtih 1 squad and 12 randoms with no mics.
and you think my reasoning is off?
i give you about 3 to 6 months post retail and people will be begging for V2K.
but that is all off topic and i'll split the diff and take half for actually engaging in that.
ping rating is a legit issue:
most of you must not be old enough to remember how bf2 worked. and it did work. because the cat with the red ping rating (which IS his fault actually, get some better service) ends up shunned. and then when you get all the red ping people out of the regular servers, they can all STILL go and play on a server with each other. nobody is stopping them from playing.
they shouldn't be playing with the green ping players. that's just the way it is.
you guys are still trying to figure out how to keep things "fair". there is no such thing as fair after kindergarten.
put in a player ping rating for a couple months and if you don't like it take it back out. it's a not a game changer in the sense of balance or mechanics. once you have it in there, nobody is gonna want it out.
Peace B Casual player in a casual clan complaining that he cant V2K ppl out of a casual high sec pubbie game which has no impact on anything Yet he calls us blind
pretty much this lolbassmeant dont u realise this is just for hisec games? FW , district battles and nullsec pretty sure u wont have just any randoms involved and can fill a full team so why u QQing about pubs Bassmeant?
and FYI V2K WILL be abused. Think about it. U get into a game with some peeps that dont like u, u driving around in ur expensive tank......they V2K u....goodbye tank u just lost. GG.
|
WyrmHero1945
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
33
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 08:35:00 -
[45] - Quote
Think of the NEWBIES. |
Deskalkulos Ildigan
CrimeWave Syndicate
115
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 11:02:00 -
[46] - Quote
I wonder if vote to kick would be even Eve like. Kick the guy who is sabotaging your Team in a pub match that doesn't count ****? The worst (imho) behaviour, is kicking for lagging. Thats as elitist as you can possibly get, against someone who just happens to have bad internet connection. Flat out denying a game to someone (who probably can't even enjoy said game) only because he/she doesn't have your superduper lagfree internetconnection is just plain wrong. There will be some kind of rogue justice, once friendly fire is activated on standard though.
Vote to kick in a corps match is another story though, although i wouldn't just say yes to it, without thinking a lot more about the pros and cons. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
125
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 11:02:00 -
[47] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:"voting to kick bad players just so you can invite good players "
oh yeah i see my problem:
i thought you guys were smart.
my mistake.
oh and 1 more thing:
if the matches don't count, as you say, then why should it matter who plays?
why SHOULDN'T folks be able to kick out the bad players and keep the good ones? you said it didn't matter... so lets cut it the other way: put in the V2K and it won't hurt anyone because like you said, kicking em outta matches that don't matter won't matter.
you guys are clueless, seriously.
my guess is some of you were kicked for being garbagey type players and thus are trying not to relive the experience of being kicked again.
like i said, once the game goes retail and enough folks lose out on money they spent because they got stuck in rooms with a buncha shipdits that cost em money... like real i spent money on stuff money... folks will want it.
especially in null.
if you don't have V2K in null with FF on, holy hell are you opening a can of worms.
if you don't have FF on in null, then really... you don't have a game.
Peace B
Casual player in a casual clan complaining that he cant V2K ppl out of a casual high sec pubbie game which has no impact on anything |
Mercian Enforcer
Sebiestor Field Sappers Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 11:21:00 -
[48] - Quote
Vote to kick will ruin the game like it did MAG many left MAG because of the VTK bullies...... If someone is TKing then have a 3-4 friendly kill and you're out like many other fps games have. Corp matches need to be sorted somehow so no random can enter, I think that could be sorted out without any need of kicking. |
Stefan Stahl
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
31
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 12:35:00 -
[49] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Responding to the OP though: When we do add any kind of ping or latency meter it will probably be in the battle finder for matches that are not of the instant battle variety and will be your connection to the battle server that battle is being hosted on. So this will be relevant to any custom matches we host for special events, factional warfare battles, and corporation battles. Please make very sure that you're looking into providing latency feedback to the player during a match.
Latency changes. I've had times where for no apparent reason I'd suddenly get horrible lag with no indication of this until I went into combat and found that I couldn't hurt anyone - despite blue shield effects and steady aim. Later on I realized that somebody else on the network had temporarily used a lot of bandwidth, but at the time I had no indication of the technical issues I was facing and thus attributed the cause wrongly - I shall not repeat the words I mentally used to describe CCP's technical expertise at the time.
Situations like these could be easily avoided and they'd harm no one at all. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1910
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 12:49:00 -
[50] - Quote
Deskalkulos Ildigan wrote:Vote to kick in a corps match is another story though, although i wouldn't just say yes to it, without thinking a lot more about the pros and cons. I think instead of V2K in Corp matches, you'd have a "recommend kick" option that advises your CEO and any Directors in the match of a request to have someone removed. From there, it's up to the senior Corp members (at least one of whom should be required for a Corp match to begin). |
|
Vethosis
DUST University Ivy League
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 14:40:00 -
[51] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:V2K has to be in.
If it's not, then this game is f'ed
leaving V2K out and FF off will kill this game faster then anything else.
Peace B Not sure we need vote to kick. What we really need though is the ability for directors to kick people from corporation matches. This becomes more important as corporation matches become more relevant, important, and you get the ability to bring none-corp members into corp matches. I think a lot of these kind of features, ability to kick and friendly fire,
I believe Vote 2 Kick can be abused by a squadron of people just kicking for the heck of it. My request might be more understandable, if someone is afk in battlefield or barely doing anything, u can get 4 ppl to kick against that certain person, he/she will get 3 minutes to hack something, call a vehicle, shoot at anything, etc.
|
Your Absolut End
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
14
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 14:50:00 -
[52] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:1. V2K is ABSOLUTELY needed in team games like dust. You guys are already dodgin out of it? seriously? damn. that's too bad. you're gonna end up forcing a buncha new players to be saddled with either useless players, afk'ers or worse, redline camp snipers. not to mention the einsteins who jump in other peoples vehicle drops. No man... there is no abuse of V2K. that's just an excuse that average players use to get out from under the kick. if you're a good player, you're not threaened by it. if you're a bad player, hell yeah you're scared. better get better. fast.
2. Match ping doesn't matter. What matters is PLAYER PING rating. Who cares if a match is crappy. We need to know WHO is draggin the match down with their lag. All the players in the match should have a ping rating = green yellow or red. then you combine V2K with a red ping rating and suddenly the match is green.
please don't tell me you're gonna protect the casuals with the lack of V2K.
that's just a stupid f'ing move.
Peace B
I understand your point here, but on the other hand you make Dust a Hardcore-No-Lier game with this, as the regular player base will disapear, and I think I don't really have to mention that you stop new players joining dust.
I can remember on the V2K in L4D, it was horrible, just people waiting in lobbys and kicking people as they wait for their friends. And if you had the honour to finally play the game you were instant kicked after a quarter of one map when you didn't play like one of the pros. For sure it wasn't that bad as I am explaining this right now, but as a new player you really had to train in singleplayer before even touching the multiplayer. And as far as I know, we won't get a single player mode for Dust so your only options are playing good or leave New Eden forever, if you don't want to switch to EVE.
If there is one thing we really DON'T need fr Dust than this. I think it is right now hard enough to climb up as a new player. Much more frustration to new players and that's it. For sure there are situations where you would like to have a V2K but we should not only orientate on the Die-Hard Players. Just my two cents. |
IRuby Heart
DIOS EX.
396
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 15:05:00 -
[53] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:i know all about hit detection and server side vs client side.
that's not a pro tip, it's just common knowledge.
and hell yeah he should be kicked for laggin.
as well as:
1. useless micless players 2. camp snipers 3. kids 4. basically anyone who doesn't know what they are doing.
you guys are all montessori about it now.
bet you'll be singin a different tune when the time comes.
you think i'm a casual gamer?
you must be new here.
Peace B
Lol Horrible reasons to support a horrible idea which is why you're not a developer. You clearly don't know what your talking about. You sound like an elitist. If they ever implement V2K, Ill be kicking you off the team not the guy with a high ping.
Peace R.H.
|
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
294
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 17:18:00 -
[54] - Quote
As I said earlier, the most important thing is that it would not script with our entire world here. Our fiction has been set up for us. We are mercs hired in groups or individually to defend or attack districts for NPC entities (for now anyway). Your employment to your contractor isn't up for peer review, that would make no sense:
Baal Omniscient wrote:
Most importantly, since these battles are not paid for by you, but by an NPC entity (Blood Raiders, Mordu's Legion, Templis Dragonaurs, etc.), no other merc hired by said entity should have the right to cancel a contract that another randomly selected player has accepted to fight that match for that NPC entity. The cancellation of such a contract would have to be up to the NPC entity itself, meaning the match making needs to be fixed.
Matchmaking is the NPC entities means of determining who ends up on your team, so if you don't like how your teams are shaping up, look for better matchmaking, not V2K. |
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
324
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 18:01:00 -
[55] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:"What we are adding in the next release, thanks to the supreme efforts of CCP Nullabor, is a quality graphic so that when looking at battles in the battle finder you get an idea of what your connection speed to the battle is"
is that per server?
or per player?
if you make it per player, make sure you add in vote to kick or it's useless.
still, good 2 hear.
Peace B
We talked briefly about this yesterday,and while I think there does need to be a VTK system,it also needs to be a fair VTK system.
MAG had a very abusive VTK system,and this game doesn't need to go down that same path.Maybe make it where only the squad leaders have the ability to initiate a VTK.Another think they could do is if the vote doesn't pass,the person that initiated it gets kicked.That would make people think twice about trying to kick people.
|
Kevales
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 19:00:00 -
[56] - Quote
If you create a V2K system, only players like BASEMEANT will stick around. Players who think that DUST is exclusively for people with fast internet connections, mics, lots of ISK, lots of AUR, and lots of free time to get 'elite' - but little opportunity to do so. Vote to kick systems are always abused, even in games where the abuses are infrequent - you see players trying to abuse it. CS:S is an example, people try to kick for being too bad, for being too good (at which point the accusations of hacking fly), for using the wrong weapon, for not doing enough teamwork, because they have a friend that wants to join...
Vote to kick is a terrible idea if it's going to be used for these reasons, the game is for everyone, not for a squad of players to decide who makes the grade to be allowed to play. And from the pro-V2K comments in here, that is exactly what most people want it for. To be able to dictate how others play the game.
Matchmaking will help with poor ping as much as possible, and will gather together players of similar skill and resources. When FF is enabled, the game can punish repeat offenders. The game should be balanced to reward the kind of gameplay that's fun for everyone and good for the team. But you shouldn't give anonymous internet f***wads the power to boot someone for arbitrary reasons. |
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
325
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 21:07:00 -
[57] - Quote
Kevales wrote:
Vote to kick is a terrible idea if it's going to be used for these reasons, the game is for everyone, not for a squad of players to decide who makes the grade to be allowed to play. And from the pro-V2K comments in here, that is exactly what most people want it for. To be able to dictate how others play the game.
.
So you mean to tell me that if a person that's doing nothing but sitting in the spawn area,shooting at his teammates and just wasting ammo and time by shooting straight into the air,and NOT helping his team win,he deserves to not be kicked?If you wanna play the game that way,fine,just not on my time nor in my matches.
There are definite times where some jackass needs to be kicked out of a match.There just needs to be a system that prevents people from abusing it.As I mentioned above,start penalizing players for failed VTK attempts.
I just now thought of another thing to add to the VTK system.Maybe if in order to VTK,it will cost your team some ISK to kick a player.Let's just call it giving money back to the people that hired you because one of the mercs isn't pulling his weight.Kind of a rebate of sorts that comes out of the pocket of the mercs on the field.Sometimes it can be worth a little money to remove players as well.
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
127
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 21:23:00 -
[58] - Quote
Th3rdSun wrote:Kevales wrote:
Vote to kick is a terrible idea if it's going to be used for these reasons, the game is for everyone, not for a squad of players to decide who makes the grade to be allowed to play. And from the pro-V2K comments in here, that is exactly what most people want it for. To be able to dictate how others play the game.
.
So you mean to tell me that if a person that's doing nothing but sitting in the spawn area,shooting at his teammates and just wasting ammo and time by shooting straight into the air,and NOT helping his team win,he deserves to not be kicked?If you wanna play the game that way,fine,just not on my time nor in my matches. There are definite times where some jackass needs to be kicked out of a match.There just needs to be a system that prevents people from abusing it.As I mentioned above,start penalizing players for failed VTK attempts. I just now thought of another thing to add to the VTK system.Maybe if in order to VTK,it will cost your team some ISK to kick a player.Let's just call it giving money back to the people that hired you because one of the mercs isn't pulling his weight.Kind of a rebate of sorts that comes out of the pocket of the mercs on the field.Sometimes it can be worth a little money to remove players as well.
Casual player in a casual clan complaining that he cant V2K ppl out of a casual high sec pubbie game which has no impact on anything |
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
325
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 23:08:00 -
[59] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Th3rdSun wrote:Kevales wrote:
Vote to kick is a terrible idea if it's going to be used for these reasons, the game is for everyone, not for a squad of players to decide who makes the grade to be allowed to play. And from the pro-V2K comments in here, that is exactly what most people want it for. To be able to dictate how others play the game.
.
So you mean to tell me that if a person that's doing nothing but sitting in the spawn area,shooting at his teammates and just wasting ammo and time by shooting straight into the air,and NOT helping his team win,he deserves to not be kicked?If you wanna play the game that way,fine,just not on my time nor in my matches. There are definite times where some jackass needs to be kicked out of a match.There just needs to be a system that prevents people from abusing it.As I mentioned above,start penalizing players for failed VTK attempts. I just now thought of another thing to add to the VTK system.Maybe if in order to VTK,it will cost your team some ISK to kick a player.Let's just call it giving money back to the people that hired you because one of the mercs isn't pulling his weight.Kind of a rebate of sorts that comes out of the pocket of the mercs on the field.Sometimes it can be worth a little money to remove players as well. Casual player in a casual clan complaining that he cant V2K ppl out of a casual high sec pubbie game which has no impact on anything
Ultimately,this is true,I have to admit.
Until we get into matches that really matter,I guess it doesn't.
Like I said before,I'm all for VTK,but it absolutely has to be done in the proper way,and that's something that people don't want to recognize.You CAN have a system in place that gives you the option to remove a troublesome teammate without making it completely abusive.First things last though,they need to up the player count per match before this is really even an option.
|
TankUVeryMuch
Betaguards
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 23:16:00 -
[60] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:V2K has to be in.
If it's not, then this game is f'ed
leaving V2K out and FF off will kill this game faster then anything else.
Peace B Not sure we need vote to kick. What we really need though is the ability for directors to kick people from corporation matches. This becomes more important as corporation matches become more relevant, important, and you get the ability to bring none-corp members into corp matches. I think a lot of these kind of features, ability to kick and friendly fire,
|
|
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
325
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 00:25:00 -
[61] - Quote
TankUVeryMuch wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:V2K has to be in.
If it's not, then this game is f'ed
leaving V2K out and FF off will kill this game faster then anything else.
Peace B Not sure we need vote to kick. What we really need though is the ability for directors to kick people from corporation matches. This becomes more important as corporation matches become more relevant, important, and you get the ability to bring none-corp members into corp matches. I think a lot of these kind of features, ability to kick and friendly fire, Friendly fire should be an option/modes. I believe that most of us don't want to lose ISK (dropsuits) from random (players) friendly fire. EDITED because it didn't post my comment the first time.
Uh,what?
Sorry,but that's crap that casuals would say.
Sure,I don't want to lose ISK,but turning on FF would make this game 1000x more tactical.
I know that supposedly friendly fire is supposed to be on only in nulsec,,but I think it should be on all the time in all sections.Forget this optional BF3 BS.
|
usrevenge2
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
71
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 00:57:00 -
[62] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:V2K has to be in.
If it's not, then this game is f'ed
leaving V2K out and FF off will kill this game faster then anything else.
Peace B Not sure we need vote to kick. What we really need though is the ability for directors to kick people from corporation matches. This becomes more important as corporation matches become more relevant, important, and you get the ability to bring none-corp members into corp matches. I think a lot of these kind of features, ability to kick and friendly fire,
why shouldn't we be able to vote to kick useless snipers or people who just feed enemies kills? |
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
294
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 02:10:00 -
[63] - Quote
usrevenge2 wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:V2K has to be in.
If it's not, then this game is f'ed
leaving V2K out and FF off will kill this game faster then anything else.
Peace B Not sure we need vote to kick. What we really need though is the ability for directors to kick people from corporation matches. This becomes more important as corporation matches become more relevant, important, and you get the ability to bring none-corp members into corp matches. I think a lot of these kind of features, ability to kick and friendly fire, why shouldn't we be able to vote to kick useless snipers or people who just feed enemies kills? Because you are contracted to do a mission. Same as that other person. You are not the contractor, you are the contractee. When you start paying others to do missions for you, then you should be able to kick whom ever you like from those matches. But until then, you are a merc, not a contractor, so you have no power over the contract of another merc. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |