|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S.
Legacy Rising
324
   |
Posted - 2013.03.09 18:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:"What we are adding in the next release, thanks to the supreme efforts of CCP Nullabor, is a quality graphic so that when looking at battles in the battle finder you get an idea of what your connection speed to the battle is"
is that per server?
or per player?
if you make it per player, make sure you add in vote to kick or it's useless.
still, good 2 hear.
Peace
B
We talked briefly about this yesterday,and while I think there does need to be a VTK system,it also needs to be a fair VTK system.
MAG had a very abusive VTK system,and this game doesn't need to go down that same path.Maybe make it where only the squad leaders have the ability to initiate a VTK.Another think they could do is if the vote doesn't pass,the person that initiated it gets kicked.That would make people think twice about trying to kick people.
|
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S.
Legacy Rising
325
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 21:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kevales wrote:
Vote to kick is a terrible idea if it's going to be used for these reasons, the game is for everyone, not for a squad of players to decide who makes the grade to be allowed to play. And from the pro-V2K comments in here, that is exactly what most people want it for. To be able to dictate how others play the game.
.
So you mean to tell me that if a person that's doing nothing but sitting in the spawn area,shooting at his teammates and just wasting ammo and time by shooting straight into the air,and NOT helping his team win,he deserves to not be kicked?If you wanna play the game that way,fine,just not on my time nor in my matches.
There are definite times where some jackass needs to be kicked out of a match.There just needs to be a system that prevents people from abusing it.As I mentioned above,start penalizing players for failed VTK attempts.
I just now thought of another thing to add to the VTK system.Maybe if in order to VTK,it will cost your team some ISK to kick a player.Let's just call it giving money back to the people that hired you because one of the mercs isn't pulling his weight.Kind of a rebate of sorts that comes out of the pocket of the mercs on the field.Sometimes it can be worth a little money to remove players as well.
|
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S.
Legacy Rising
325
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 23:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Th3rdSun wrote:Kevales wrote:
Vote to kick is a terrible idea if it's going to be used for these reasons, the game is for everyone, not for a squad of players to decide who makes the grade to be allowed to play. And from the pro-V2K comments in here, that is exactly what most people want it for. To be able to dictate how others play the game.
.
So you mean to tell me that if a person that's doing nothing but sitting in the spawn area,shooting at his teammates and just wasting ammo and time by shooting straight into the air,and NOT helping his team win,he deserves to not be kicked?If you wanna play the game that way,fine,just not on my time nor in my matches. There are definite times where some jackass needs to be kicked out of a match.There just needs to be a system that prevents people from abusing it.As I mentioned above,start penalizing players for failed VTK attempts. I just now thought of another thing to add to the VTK system.Maybe if in order to VTK,it will cost your team some ISK to kick a player.Let's just call it giving money back to the people that hired you because one of the mercs isn't pulling his weight.Kind of a rebate of sorts that comes out of the pocket of the mercs on the field.Sometimes it can be worth a little money to remove players as well. Casual player in a casual clan complaining that he cant V2K ppl out of a casual high sec pubbie game which has no impact on anything
Ultimately,this is true,I have to admit.
Until we get into matches that really matter,I guess it doesn't.
Like I said before,I'm all for VTK,but it absolutely has to be done in the proper way,and that's something that people don't want to recognize.You CAN have a system in place that gives you the option to remove a troublesome teammate without making it completely abusive.First things last though,they need to up the player count per match before this is really even an option.
|
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S.
Legacy Rising
325
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 00:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
TankUVeryMuch wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:V2K has to be in.
If it's not, then this game is f'ed
leaving V2K out and FF off will kill this game faster then anything else.
Peace
B Not sure we need vote to kick. What we really need though is the ability for directors to kick people from corporation matches. This becomes more important as corporation matches become more relevant, important, and you get the ability to bring none-corp members into corp matches. I think a lot of these kind of features, ability to kick and friendly fire, Friendly fire should be an option/modes. I believe that most of us don't want to lose ISK (dropsuits) from random (players) friendly fire. EDITED because it didn't post my comment the first time.
Uh,what?
Sorry,but that's crap that casuals would say.
Sure,I don't want to lose ISK,but turning on FF would make this game 1000x more tactical.
I know that supposedly friendly fire is supposed to be on only in nulsec,,but I think it should be on all the time in all sections.Forget this optional BF3 BS.
|
|
|
| |
|