| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1878
   |
Posted - 2013.03.07 14:51:00 -
[61] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:
That was closer to 15m than 2m. Probably actually 10m, but why don't I play your game for a bit?
attacker was aiming the wrong way by the time he moved,
now you claim this is 15-10 meters away and he aimed in the wrong direction sure that 3 meters are magically 10-15 meters and he wasnt aiming at him properly at all, but oh wait the video shows something else  https://www.dropbox.com/s/9n4k18aswsyueyk/Clipboard01.jpg yeah that is "totally" 10 meters away and he is "totally" not aiming at him hahaha no word can describe your cluelessness but I guess ignorance is a blessing in your case 
Lets look at the position he was firing from - but BEFORE he scoped in (he didn't move closer, he ONLY used the sights, which ZOOM YOUR VIEW IN):
Link.
That definitely looks a lot like 3m. You're totally right.
Now lets look at how "on-target" he was as his target started to move:
Link.
Yep. On-target. Definitely. |
Jack McReady
A.C.M.E Corp
75
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 15:41:00 -
[62] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Jack McReady wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:
That was closer to 15m than 2m. Probably actually 10m, but why don't I play your game for a bit?
attacker was aiming the wrong way by the time he moved,
now you claim this is 15-10 meters away and he aimed in the wrong direction sure that 3 meters are magically 10-15 meters and he wasnt aiming at him properly at all, but oh wait the video shows something else https://www.dropbox.com/s/9n4k18aswsyueyk/Clipboard01.jpg yeah that is "totally" 10 meters away and he is "totally" not aiming at him hahaha no word can describe your cluelessness but I guess ignorance is a blessing in your case Lets look at the position he was firing from - but BEFORE he scoped in (he didn't move closer, he ONLY used the sights, which ZOOM YOUR VIEW IN): Link.That definitely looks a lot like 3m. You're totally right. Now lets look at how "on-target" he was as his target started to move: Link.Yep. On-target. Definitely.
your first screenshots shows him walking up to him
your second screenshot shows the assault guy walking away after receiving bullets for over a second.
so what is your point again? that you are a welp full of ignorance?
what is even more amusing is, that you still try to argue about something that you cant argue, everyone can check the video and see that you are full of bs
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1878
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 16:18:00 -
[63] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Lets look at the position he was firing from - but BEFORE he scoped in (he didn't move closer, he ONLY used the sights, which ZOOM YOUR VIEW IN): Link.That definitely looks a lot like 3m. You're totally right. Now lets look at how "on-target" he was as his target started to move: Link.Yep. On-target. Definitely. your first screenshots shows him walking up to him your second screenshot shows the assault guy walking away after receiving bullets for over a second.
My first shot shows him right as he's about to scope in, at which point he moves less than 1m forward while firing. Try actually watching the video a second time instead of assuming you processed it all perfectly the first time. I've re-watched it several times to be as clear as possible on what's happening. You obviously haven't, or you wouldn't be missing all the points where you're so wrong it should be painful.
My second pic shows how far off his aim had been BEFORE the target started to move. I couldn't get exactly the right timing (I tried several times without the dodgy button on this laptop's trackpad letting me catch the moment I wanted), but he started to turn his aim to the right just BEFORE the Assault moved to the left instead - heading IMMEDIATELY for the objective TO TAKE COVER FROM THE NEAR-LETHAL SMG FIRE. In case you didn't notice, the Assault's armour dropped HARD with only a single SMG round hitting it. The guy is very visibly shield-tanked, with probably minimal, if any, buffs to his armour (passive skills at most, no mods). Even when he was taking fire that you admit is being attempted at long range for the SMG, and only takes one bullet, there's a clearly-visible drop in the Assault suit's armour, in spite of partial damage going into the shields that had just started to regen when the shot connected.
And here's something that someone with your attitude might say to you if they'd actually watched the video through more than once:
Quote:so what is your point again? that you are a welp full of ignorance? what is even more amusing is, that you still try to argue about something that you cant argue, everyone can check the video and see that you are full of bs your troll posts dont help you in anyway, you just make yourself look stupid.
I'm not that rude though, so instead I'll just reiterate that you might stop making yourself look so confused if you try rewatching your own "evidence" and see what really happened. Also, if you're going to call someone "ignorant" you should probably spell "whelp" correctly when it's used in the same sentence. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |