| Pages: [1] 2 3  :: one page | 
      
      
        | Author | Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) | 
      
      
        |  Hana-Maru
 DUST University
 Ivy League
 
 10
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:08:00 -
          [1] - Quote 
 Seriously! It's getting to be #%{^#* ridiculous! These things have no place in ambush.
 It can be challenging enough to take one down when you can control little things like spawn point and cooperation but in random ambushes, there is no such hope.
 This is horribly imbalanced and needs to be addressed.
 | 
      
      
        |  Vermaak Doe
 SVER True Blood
 Unclaimed.
 
 399
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:10:00 -
          [2] - Quote 
 Your tears are sweat, do you cry cinnabon
 | 
      
      
        |  Iago Templar
 SVER True Blood
 Unclaimed.
 
 0
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:13:00 -
          [3] - Quote 
 
 Vermaak Doe wrote:Your tears are sweat, do you cry cinnabon 
 Best reply EVAR.
 | 
      
      
        |  Tech Ohm Eaven
 L.O.T.I.S.
 Legacy Rising
 
 402
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:19:00 -
          [4] - Quote 
 
 Hana-Maru wrote:Seriously! It's getting to be #%{^#* ridiculous! These things have no place in ambush. It can be challenging enough to take one down when you can control little things like spawn point and cooperation but in random ambushes, there is no such hope.
 This is horribly imbalanced and needs to be addressed.
 
 Wrong section.
 Post this in FEEDBACK.
 
 I.e. please limit tanks to one or two count in the Ambush game mode.
 Then give your reasons why you ask this and then continue to post in your thread.
 
 I.e. tanks have unlimited ammo, can move at 25m a second versus ammo limited infantry thats also much slower, etc.
 
 Bye.
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Coleman Gray
 Coalition Of Goverments
 
 48
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:21:00 -
          [5] - Quote 
 If everyone took AV grenades Tanks wouldn't be an issue
 | 
      
      
        |  Iron Wolf Saber
 BetaMax.
 
 2868
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:21:00 -
          [6] - Quote 
 Just give me the damn plasma cannon.
 | 
      
      
        |  General John Ripper
 Killshot Corp
 
 37
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:22:00 -
          [7] - Quote 
 Your tears are sweet, do you cry cinnamon?
 
 Corrected it for you. I hope you do not mind.
 | 
      
      
        |  KalOfTheRathi
 CowTek
 
 169
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:24:00 -
          [8] - Quote 
 
 Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:And lose the INTERNET SCREAMING KEY.Hana-Maru wrote:-- snip of QQ, QQ, QQ, I don't understand -- Wrong section. Post this in FEEDBACK. I.e. please limit tanks to one or two count in the Ambush game mode. Then give your reasons why you ask this and then continue to post in your thread. I.e. tanks have unlimited ammo, can move at 25m a second versus ammo limited infantry thats also much slower, etc. Bye. 
 Many will just ignore posts with CAPS subject lines.
 | 
      
      
        |  Don Von Hulio
 UnReaL.
 
 91
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:25:00 -
          [9] - Quote 
 
 Vermaak Doe wrote:Your tears are sweat, do you cry cinnabon sweet*
 | 
      
      
        |  Dachande Anasazi
 IMPSwarm
 Negative-Feedback
 
 10
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:26:00 -
          [10] - Quote 
 
 Hana-Maru wrote:Seriously! It's getting to be #%{^#* ridiculous! These things have no place in ambush. It can be challenging enough to take one down when you can control little things like spawn point and cooperation but in random ambushes, there is no such hope.
 This is horribly imbalanced and needs to be addressed.
 
 I just made a tank alt. You know to kill tanks easily? AV nades.
 
 On my main the other team had 4 tanks out. AV nades..BAM BAM BAM BAM.
 
 Stop QQ and spend your SP
 | 
      
      
        |  Iron Wolf Saber
 BetaMax.
 
 2868
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:30:00 -
          [11] - Quote 
 
 General John Ripper wrote:Your tears are sweet, do you cry cinnamon?
 Corrected it for you. I hope you do not mind.
 
 cinnabon is a company infamously known for its heartstopping cinnamon rolls.
 | 
      
      
        |  Alan-Ibn-Xuan Al-Alasabe
 Planetary Response Organisation
 Test Friends Please Ignore
 
 97
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:30:00 -
          [12] - Quote 
 
 General John Ripper wrote:Your tears are sweet, do you cry cinnamon?
 Corrected it for you. I hope you do not mind.
 http://www.cinnabon.com/
 | 
      
      
        |  Tech Ohm Eaven
 L.O.T.I.S.
 Legacy Rising
 
 402
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:39:00 -
          [13] - Quote 
 
 Dachande Anasazi wrote:Hana-Maru wrote:Seriously! It's getting to be #%{^#* ridiculous! These things have no place in ambush. It can be challenging enough to take one down when you can control little things like spawn point and cooperation but in random ambushes, there is no such hope.
 This is horribly imbalanced and needs to be addressed.
 I just made a tank alt. You know to kill tanks easily? AV nades.  On my main the other team had 4 tanks out. AV nades..BAM BAM BAM BAM. Stop QQ and spend your SP 
 FOUR tanks and you killed them all with just AV nades??
 
 They were four good tanks then they took a melee to the knee..........
 
 But for real whenever a team rolls four tanks its over no matter how good your gungame is.
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Rasatsu
 Much Crying Old Experts
 
 444
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:45:00 -
          [14] - Quote 
 
 Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:FOUR tanks and you killed them all with just AV nades??
 They were four good tanks then they took a melee to the knee..........
 
 But for real whenever a team rolls four tanks its over no matter how good your gungame is.
 
 You have _NO_ idea how easy tanks are to kill.
 | 
      
      
        |  Tech Ohm Eaven
 L.O.T.I.S.
 Legacy Rising
 
 402
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:51:00 -
          [15] - Quote 
 
 Rasatsu wrote:Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:FOUR tanks and you killed them all with just AV nades??
 They were four good tanks then they took a melee to the knee..........
 
 But for real whenever a team rolls four tanks its over no matter how good your gungame is.
 
 You have _NO_ idea how easy four MILITIA tanks are to kill but if its four Sagaris/Surya tanks you are screwed. 
 Fixed.
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Rasatsu
 Much Crying Old Experts
 
 444
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 14:56:00 -
          [16] - Quote 
 
 Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:Rasatsu wrote:Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:FOUR tanks and you killed them all with just AV nades??
 They were four good tanks then they took a melee to the knee..........
 
 But for real whenever a team rolls four tanks its over no matter how good your gungame is.
 
 You have _NO_ idea how easy four MILITIA tanks are to kill but if its four Sagaris/Surya tanks you are screwed. Fixed. Ehm, I use a Sagaris, so no, not fixed.
 | 
      
      
        |  Tech Ohm Eaven
 L.O.T.I.S.
 Legacy Rising
 
 402
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 15:01:00 -
          [17] - Quote 
 
 Rasatsu wrote:Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:Rasatsu wrote:Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:FOUR tanks and you killed them all with just AV nades??
 They were four good tanks then they took a melee to the knee..........
 
 But for real whenever a team rolls four tanks its over no matter how good your gungame is.
 
 You have _NO_ idea how easy four MILITIA tanks are to kill but if its four Sagaris/Surya tanks you are screwed. Fixed. Ehm, I use a Sagaris, so no, not fixed. 
 So we are talking about the enemy team brings in FOUR Sagaris/Surya tanks.
 Once those four tanks are on the field its over.
 
 Bringing in your own Sagaris tank?
 Futile.
 The RDV will be shot down.
 AV?? versus four Sagaris/Suryas?
 Futile.
 
 Been there done that E3 Tankers Paradise build.
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Vermaak Doe
 SVER True Blood
 Unclaimed.
 
 400
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 15:03:00 -
          [18] - Quote 
 
 General John Ripper wrote:Your tears are sweet, do you cry cinnamon?
 Corrected it for you. I hope you do not mind.
 I was rushing a bit but a had cinnabon right.
 | 
      
      
        |  Travi Zyg
 G I A N T
 
 13
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 15:08:00 -
          [19] - Quote 
 so much crying here everyday. My god just play the game, these types of threads dont even deserve to be moved to feedback anymore. They have ceased to be constructive for a long time. this forum has sadly become worse than GFAQS in its entirety, shame shame.
 | 
      
      
        |  JETSTORM1090
 Against All Oddz
 
 1
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 15:12:00 -
          [20] - Quote 
 I cant believe people thinking that tanks in tdm AKA ambush is a good idea, You would have to be an idiot to think its ok. In normal ambush the maps are way too small so when you do try to take a tank out you are constantly getting killed by other footmen spawning next to you or you spawn in front of the tank....and only tankers will say its okay because they're having a blast racking up the kills lol.
 | 
      
      
        |  Tech Ohm Eaven
 L.O.T.I.S.
 Legacy Rising
 
 402
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 15:14:00 -
          [21] - Quote 
 
 Travi Zyg wrote:so much crying here everyday. My god just play the game, these types of threads dont even deserve to be moved to feedback anymore. They have ceased to be constructive for a long time. this forum has sadly become worse than GFAQS in its entirety, shame shame. 
 
 Yes, right, right and its not like the top player is a TANK DRIVER right??.....er wait!!!
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Travi Zyg
 G I A N T
 
 13
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 15:23:00 -
          [22] - Quote 
 
 Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:Travi Zyg wrote:so much crying here everyday. My god just play the game, these types of threads dont even deserve to be moved to feedback anymore. They have ceased to be constructive for a long time. this forum has sadly become worse than GFAQS in its entirety, shame shame. Yes, right, right and its not like the top player is a TANK DRIVER right??.....er wait!!! 
 
 i dont see the point here, using someones top spot on the boards for leverage against a class is silly. If tank is "SOOOOOO EASY MODE" and cheap in ambush why is there a concern that there is a tanker in the top stop? take comfort in thinking he got there cuz hes easy moding the game and being cheap. Not personally my belief but w/e.
 
 No matter what, there will always be people that will exploit the "easy mode" stuff (which will ALWAYS exist in every game) to climb to the top.
 
 Am i part of some sort of rediculous 1% that doesnt run tank and doesnt QQ about it?
 | 
      
      
        |  Iskandar Zul Karnain
 Hellstorm Inc
 League of Infamy
 
 178
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 15:34:00 -
          [23] - Quote 
 Nope. Awful idea.
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Fornacis Fairchild
 Kat 5 Kaos
 
 26
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 15:41:00 -
          [24] - Quote 
 Sometimes I see 3 to 4 tanks on the other side on the A B C map in Ambush.....makes it rough, but the other maps there is really no reason to use a tank. If the infanty is smart they will stay among cover and can easily win the fight.
 
 Usually the trend is the big corps get tired of newberry ownage by Militia rifles and bring in the calvary....or so it seems.
 
 Other than that I think 1 tank on each side is plenty for 16 vs 16 ambush. If its opened up to 48 vs 48 then 2 tanks on each side.
 
 I've tried the AV nades, and coming in on my starter Anti - Armor set and its next to useless. The launch is stupid to use.....I mean its like the same damn lock time if you're 10m away or 40m away......great design.
 
 I'm still focusing on my main builds to be bothered with sinking SP into Anti-Armor, but hopefully I can have some fun points to spend soon.
 | 
      
      
        |  Tech Ohm Eaven
 L.O.T.I.S.
 Legacy Rising
 
 402
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 15:45:00 -
          [25] - Quote 
 
 Travi Zyg wrote:Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:Travi Zyg wrote:so much crying here everyday. My god just play the game, these types of threads dont even deserve to be moved to feedback anymore. They have ceased to be constructive for a long time. this forum has sadly become worse than GFAQS in its entirety, shame shame. Yes, right, right and its not like the top player is a TANK DRIVER right??.....er wait!!! i dont see the point here, using someones top spot on the boards for leverage against a class is silly. If tank is "SOOOOOO EASY MODE" and cheap in ambush why is there a concern that there is a tanker in the top stop? take comfort in thinking he got there cuz hes easy moding the game and being cheap. Not personally my belief but w/e. No matter what, there will always be people that will exploit the "easy mode" stuff (which will ALWAYS exist in every game) to climb to the top.  Am i part of some sort of rediculous 1% that doesnt run tank and doesnt QQ about it? 
 
 I do not run tank but then I remember when there where FIVE tanks per match in the E3 build and it was useless to continue that game.
 
 I chase after tanks trying to kill them and its futile when you need 16 AV to kill four good tanks.
 Its best to either try to avoid them or quit game or play some other game until its balanced.
 
 With such a small player count it needs to be buff the tanks health a bit but limit the tank number to two per match or just one in the case of Ambush.
 
 Tankers going 60 and 0 did not kill the game and no amount of newberry QQ did that but what will kill the game is lack of content in a timely manner.
 
 Good day.
 
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Tech Ohm Eaven
 L.O.T.I.S.
 Legacy Rising
 
 402
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 15:50:00 -
          [26] - Quote 
 
 Fornacis Fairchild wrote:Sometimes I see 3 to 4 tanks on the other side on the A B C map in Ambush.....makes it rough, but the other maps there is really no reason to use a tank. If the infanty is smart they will stay among cover and can easily win the fight.
 Usually the trend is the big corps get tired of newberry ownage by Militia rifles and bring in the calvary....or so it seems.
 
 Other than that I think 1 tank on each side is plenty for 16 vs 16 ambush. If its opened up to 48 vs 48 then 2 tanks on each side.
 
 I've tried the AV nades, and coming in on my starter Anti - Armor set and its next to useless. The launch is stupid to use.....I mean its like the same damn lock time if you're 10m away or 40m away......great design.
 
 I'm still focusing on my main builds to be bothered with sinking SP into Anti-Armor, but hopefully I can have some fun points to spend soon.
 
 Agreed.
 The player counts are too small for four tanks.
 It needs to be 1 tank per side in Ambush.
 But the tanks do need a small health buff and a limit of two reppers max since I can run four reppers and negate a lot of damage.
 
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Lurchasaurus
 SVER True Blood
 Unclaimed.
 
 810
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.27 16:50:00 -
          [27] - Quote 
 You need to stop it with the "tanks are unfair, stop that!" talk.
 
 This is a sandbox and we can do what we want. If there are 4 proto tanks on the field, the enemy team has easily invested 10 mil isk to win a pub match. no **** your going to lose. You really think your militia swarms are going to counter that? get some av nades.
 
 I would be chompin at the bit to destroy some isk like that.
 
 If you are in a fleet of 10 frigates in EVE and the enemy comes in with caps, your not living long. Thats how it works.
 
 The enemy just stepped it up and brought a tank to a gun fight. Put the knife away.
 | 
      
      
        |  trollface dot jpg
 Destined 4 Biomass
 
 24
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.28 01:24:00 -
          [28] - Quote 
 
 Lurchasaurus wrote:You need to stop it with the "tanks are unfair, stop that!" talk. 
 This is a sandbox and we can do what we want. If there are 4 proto tanks on the field, the enemy team has easily invested 10 mil isk to win a pub match. no **** your going to lose. You really think your militia swarms are going to counter that? get some av nades.
 
 I would be chompin at the bit to destroy some isk like that.
 
 If you are in a fleet of 10 frigates in EVE and the enemy comes in with caps, your not living long. Thats how it works.
 
 The enemy just stepped it up and brought a tank to a gun fight. Put the knife away.
 AV nades on a top level tank? Please. 180 plates, 2 active 25% hardners, 1 passive 11% resistance mod, 9% damage control unit just for S&G's on a Madrugar. Oh look, you STILL have slots left for more health even though your tank can now take 8 AV grenades without dying! And you are saying AV grenades will drop 4 proto tanks properly fitted, let alone one in a match where you cannot control where you spawn or who/what you spawn near? Please, tell me more.
  | 
      
      
        |  Y0UR NAME HERE
 Imperfects
 Negative-Feedback
 
 455
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.28 01:30:00 -
          [29] - Quote 
 
 trollface dot jpg wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:You need to stop it with the "tanks are unfair, stop that!" talk. 
 This is a sandbox and we can do what we want. If there are 4 proto tanks on the field, the enemy team has easily invested 10 mil isk to win a pub match. no **** your going to lose. You really think your militia swarms are going to counter that? get some av nades.
 
 I would be chompin at the bit to destroy some isk like that.
 
 If you are in a fleet of 10 frigates in EVE and the enemy comes in with caps, your not living long. Thats how it works.
 
 The enemy just stepped it up and brought a tank to a gun fight. Put the knife away.
 AV nades on a top level tank? Please. 180 plates, 2 active 25% hardners, 1 passive 11% resistance mod, 9% damage control unit just for S&G's on a Madrugar. Oh look, you STILL have slots left for more health even though your tank can now take 8 AV grenades without dying! And you are saying AV grenades will drop 4 proto tanks properly fitted, let alone one in a match where you cannot control where you spawn or who/what you spawn near? Please, tell me more.  
 
 There are no proto tanks.
 
 Here you kids are with your proto Av and our advanced tanks totally blow.
 
 Why does everyone want tanks removed from this game??
 
 Seriously this is getting annoying,
 
 You have nerfed us enough.
 
 If you think AV is an issue, maybe its because your playing cqc Ambush?
 
 Tanks hardly even survive in skirmish, why you see so many in ambush, squads can kill AV when they spawn.
 
 Stop nerfing the hell out of us and maybe u'd see tanks in skirmish.
 
 Its your own nerfing fault we're in ambush.
 
 QQ in a corner.
 | 
      
      
        |  Kira Lannister
 Hellstorm Inc
 League of Infamy
 
 724
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.02.28 01:33:00 -
          [30] - Quote 
 
 Y0UR NAME HERE wrote:trollface dot jpg wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:You need to stop it with the "tanks are unfair, stop that!" talk. 
 This is a sandbox and we can do what we want. If there are 4 proto tanks on the field, the enemy team has easily invested 10 mil isk to win a pub match. no **** your going to lose. You really think your militia swarms are going to counter that? get some av nades.
 
 I would be chompin at the bit to destroy some isk like that.
 
 If you are in a fleet of 10 frigates in EVE and the enemy comes in with caps, your not living long. Thats how it works.
 
 The enemy just stepped it up and brought a tank to a gun fight. Put the knife away.
 AV nades on a top level tank? Please. 180 plates, 2 active 25% hardners, 1 passive 11% resistance mod, 9% damage control unit just for S&G's on a Madrugar. Oh look, you STILL have slots left for more health even though your tank can now take 8 AV grenades without dying! And you are saying AV grenades will drop 4 proto tanks properly fitted, let alone one in a match where you cannot control where you spawn or who/what you spawn near? Please, tell me more.  There are no proto tanks. Here you kids are with your proto Av and our advanced tanks totally blow. Why does everyone want tanks removed from this game?? Seriously this is getting annoying, You have nerfed us enough. If you think AV is an issue, maybe its because your playing cqc Ambush? Tanks hardly even survive in skirmish, why you see so many in ambush, squads can kill AV when they spawn. Stop nerfing the hell out of us and maybe u'd see tanks in skirmish. Its your own nerfing fault we're in ambush. QQ in a corner. 
 stop the QQ
 
 | 
      
        |  |  | 
      
      
        | Pages: [1] 2 3  :: one page | 
      
      
        | First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |