DUST Search - Need UVT for corp voice now? GG CCP

All Channels

General Discussions

Need UVT for corp voice now? GG CCP

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Leither Yiltron KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 417	Posted - 2012.12.19 06:26:00 - [91] - Quote CCP Frame wrote: Hey guys, We are currently investigating this issue and will update you here the moment we have more information available. Thank you for your patience. This is definitely relieving. I can't wait until we have our corp channels back.
Tectonious Falcon The Southern Legion 395	Posted - 2012.12.19 07:59:00 - [92] - Quote Tony Calif wrote: It's stupid. 500k EvE accounts. 50k online at 1 time ever. What is wrong with borrowing the 450k unused channels that are ALREADY paid for? Sorry but I don't see any reason to pay for services which are already paid for. Charging twice for the same service is Bullshit. This. From what I've heard, most big EVE corps use things like Teamspeak, vent or mumble rather than EVE's voice chat, but they still pay for the voice chat as part of their subscription, even though they don't use it. Why can't we just use the same servers as them, that have already been paid for? Especially since we're going to be in the same corporations as they, meaning we will be using the same channel as they are.
Rasatsu Much Crying Old Experts 437	Posted - 2012.12.19 09:45:00 - [93] - Quote Tectonious Falcon wrote: Tony Calif wrote: It's stupid. 500k EvE accounts. 50k online at 1 time ever. What is wrong with borrowing the 450k unused channels that are ALREADY paid for? Sorry but I don't see any reason to pay for services which are already paid for. Charging twice for the same service is Bullshit. This. From what I've heard, most big EVE corps use things like Teamspeak, vent or mumble rather than EVE's voice chat, but they still pay for the voice chat as part of their subscription, even though they don't use it. Why can't we just use the same servers as them, that have already been paid for? Especially since we're going to be in the same corporations as they, meaning we will be using the same channel as they are. Wait... you think those are paid for already? You really think CCP paid for 500k voice channels? Are you... mental?
Tectonious Falcon The Southern Legion 395	Posted - 2012.12.19 10:07:00 - [94] - Quote Rasatsu wrote: Tectonious Falcon wrote: Tony Calif wrote: It's stupid. 500k EvE accounts. 50k online at 1 time ever. What is wrong with borrowing the 450k unused channels that are ALREADY paid for? Sorry but I don't see any reason to pay for services which are already paid for. Charging twice for the same service is Bullshit. This. From what I've heard, most big EVE corps use things like Teamspeak, vent or mumble rather than EVE's voice chat, but they still pay for the voice chat as part of their subscription, even though they don't use it. Why can't we just use the same servers as them, that have already been paid for? Especially since we're going to be in the same corporations as they, meaning we will be using the same channel as they are. Wait... you think those are paid for already? You really think CCP paid for 500k voice channels? Are you... mental? Please quote the section of my post where I said this.
Odiain Suliis ZionTCD Legacy Rising 112	Posted - 2012.12.19 10:27:00 - [95] - Quote Tectonious Falcon wrote: Tony Calif wrote: It's stupid. 500k EvE accounts. 50k online at 1 time ever. What is wrong with borrowing the 450k unused channels that are ALREADY paid for? Sorry but I don't see any reason to pay for services which are already paid for. Charging twice for the same service is Bullshit. This. From what I've heard, most big EVE corps use things like Teamspeak, vent or mumble rather than EVE's voice chat, but they still pay for the voice chat as part of their subscription, even though they don't use it. Why can't we just use the same servers as them, that have already been paid for? Especially since we're going to be in the same corporations as they, meaning we will be using the same channel as they are. And what should we do when/if DUST picks up and grows playerbase as bigas EVE or larger? You suppose that EVE sub's are still paying our voice comm bills? What if DUST has 1mil- 3mil users that use voice comms? You think that that portion of EVE sub that is reserved for EVE-vioce bills are enough?
Guinevere Bravo SVER True Blood Unclaimed. 140	Posted - 2012.12.19 10:40:00 - [96] - Quote CCP Frame wrote: Hey guys, We are currently investigating this issue and will update you here the moment we have more information available. Thank you for your patience. Im glad your looking into this Frame, It will destroy the ability for new players to get invovled and will push them to think this F2P game is going to be full of little 'neccessary purchases' which it's not. Corp chat is one of the only few social features that is currently working well, if half the corp cant use the chat then whats the point?.
JW v Weingarten SyNergy Gaming 300	Posted - 2012.12.19 10:55:00 - [97] - Quote lol@peoplesayingtouseteamspeak There are more people that are not able to set up a pc/laptop/whatever you wanna use to get teamspeak running next to their ps3 than people without aurum.
Captain-Awesome Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 349	Posted - 2012.12.19 11:42:00 - [98] - Quote JW v Weingarten wrote: lol@peoplesayingtouseteamspeak There are more people that are not able to set up a pc/laptop/whatever you wanna use to get teamspeak running next to their ps3 than people without aurum. I use my phone :p
Tony Calif Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 2002	Posted - 2012.12.19 11:55:00 - [99] - Quote Still waiting to hear why we can't just freeload off the EvE subs, and what about people with EvE accs? Will all EvE players be provided with a monthly UVT to donate to their Dust char, or their friends? Or maybe 30x 1day UVT, 4x weekly, whatever would be best for EvE players trying to contact Dusters. There could be a great deal of benefit to this, including people subbing for EvE if it works out only fractionally more expensive.
EnglishSnake Zumari Force Projection Caldari State 1012	Posted - 2012.12.19 12:56:00 - [100] - Quote Tony Calif wrote: Still waiting to hear why we can't just freeload off the EvE subs, and what about people with EvE accs? Will all EvE players be provided with a monthly UVT to donate to their Dust char, or their friends? Or maybe 30x 1day UVT, 4x weekly, whatever would be best for EvE players trying to contact Dusters. There could be a great deal of benefit to this, including people subbing for EvE if it works out only fractionally more expensive. Because the EVE subs have already been paying for the development of this game and also the development of another game called World of Darkness about vampires i think This UVT as it is allows all the ppl in a corp to talk to each other which with some corps is already 200+ members, no other game console game that i can think of allowed this either tbh Dont say MAG either because you could only talk to ppl in your 8 man squad or 16 if glitched, clan deploy later on allowed upto the full 128 but for example at =V= if everyone was on at once 500+ ppl you still couldnt talk to everyone you would need 4 CD open but also that was only talking to ppl in your corp. But also that was when out of game with CD not ingame Think about custom chat channels that ppl make so corp leaders can get into one and talk about an alliance or whatever without having to drop tags and join someone else for 10min I can see why ppl dont want the UVT and i can understand it but the UVT is still unfinished and is still getting tweeked as to what channels it will effect and how much AUR it will cost and if we can buy a bunch and give to ppl in our corp or if it will be available for ISK Right now tho short term solution is get the 4000 AUR package for -ú1.59 and buy 33yrs and 3 months worth of UVTs if you really want to at the current beta price

NAV HIV The Generals 151	Posted - 2012.12.19 13:12:00 - [101] - Quote Mavado V Noriega wrote: this wont be a big issue if CCP actually had a corp wide UVT which one person can buy and enable on the corp channel its not a problem to pay tbh, but it is a problem FORCING every single corp member to pay a seperate fee because like ppl said not everyone has access to a credit card (kids) and shouldnt force everyone to buy a PSN card for some aurum to socialize. I'll gladly pay for my corpwide uvt for my guys tbh i got no issue with that i know they need to make money I dont mind doing that either.
Brush Master HavoK Core 162	Posted - 2012.12.19 18:46:00 - [102] - Quote CCP Frame wrote: Hey guys, We are currently investigating this issue and will update you here the moment we have more information available. Thank you for your patience. Give us a name so we can rage on that poor developer haha.
PalaceGuard CrimeWave Syndicate 15	Posted - 2012.12.19 23:50:00 - [103] - Quote If CCP eventually allows selling UVTs on the market, then players can buy them with isk, or perhaps do a private transfer from player to player? A corporation might even might even buy them for their members.
Sandromin Hes Sand Mercenary Corps Inc. 204	Posted - 2012.12.20 00:33:00 - [104] - Quote Rasatsu wrote: Tectonious Falcon wrote: Tony Calif wrote: It's stupid. 500k EvE accounts. 50k online at 1 time ever. What is wrong with borrowing the 450k unused channels that are ALREADY paid for? Sorry but I don't see any reason to pay for services which are already paid for. Charging twice for the same service is Bullshit. This. From what I've heard, most big EVE corps use things like Teamspeak, vent or mumble rather than EVE's voice chat, but they still pay for the voice chat as part of their subscription, even though they don't use it. Why can't we just use the same servers as them, that have already been paid for? Especially since we're going to be in the same corporations as they, meaning we will be using the same channel as they are. Wait... you think those are paid for already? You really think CCP paid for 500k voice channels? Are you... mental? Yes, because all of those 500k people definitely have their own corporation, and don't share the same local chat or anything... nope, they get private chats all to themselves... Seriously? Lolno. They pay for 1 voice server that has thousands of sub-channels. You didn't read what he typed, did you?
Sytonis Auran Valor Coalition RISE of LEGION 52	Posted - 2012.12.20 01:03:00 - [105] - Quote PalaceGuard wrote: If CCP eventually allows selling UVTs on the market, then players can buy them with isk, or perhaps do a private transfer from player to player? A corporation might even might even buy them for their members. I'm not sure about the whole issue of UVT. I can see both sides though I would quite quickly change my mind should UVT price raise (too much.). From the other viewpoint, a low low cost item that is likely to be bought by a many is great income for CCP. Regarding the point quoted. Certain sections of Eve has shown great hostility to Dust 514, it would be altogether too easy for them to manipulate the market and price this item out of reach of ISK purchase.


Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.