| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
Legacy Rising
886
   |
Posted - 2012.11.01 07:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
There is no incentive for players to resecure an objective after the enemy has hacked it. It takes longer to secure and you should get points for it.
Players, now, deliberately allow the hack to go through so they can get the points for hacking it. Meanwhile, the enemy does damage to the MCC and they spawn right behind you on the objective.
Players need points to resecure an objective |
I-Shayz-I
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
172
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 07:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
Good point, and well made.
+1 |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 10:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Thanks....I just haven't seen any threads on this which is rather surprising |
Adeptus Ezekiel
Bragian Order
Amarr Empire
30
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 11:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:There is no incentive for players to resecure an objective after the enemy has hacked it. It takes longer to secure and you should get points for it.
Players, now, deliberately allow the hack to go through so they can get the points for hacking it. Meanwhile, the enemy does damage to the MCC and they spawn right behind you on the objective.
Players need points to resecure an objective
+1 |
Ops Fox
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
197
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 14:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
+1 |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
3064
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 14:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
+1
The lack of points for this is inexcusable. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
690
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 14:54:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:There is no incentive for players to resecure an objective after the enemy has hacked it. It takes longer to secure and you should get points for it.
Players, now, deliberately allow the hack to go through so they can get the points for hacking it. Meanwhile, the enemy does damage to the MCC and they spawn right behind you on the objective.
Players need points to resecure an objective
+1 |
H arpoon
WarRavens
26
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 14:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
+1 This has been on my mind for a while. |
Serk Gallis
Fancy Men of Cornwall
9
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 15:11:00 -
[9] - Quote
+1 |
Moonracer2000
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
314
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 15:34:00 -
[10] - Quote
I've also said you should get hack assist points for covering your team while they hack. That way you don't get 3 people facing a console all getting shot in the back because no one wanted to miss out on points. If you are 10 meters from a hack taking place you are helping.
The system should reward players for doing the right thing instead of encouraging them to play poorly. |
|
|
Kain Spero
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
907
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 15:39:00 -
[11] - Quote
Big +1 to this. I also like Mooracer2000's proximity to the console idea. |
Joe Darkwater
Royal Uhlans
Amarr Empire
15
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 17:23:00 -
[12] - Quote
Read this somewhere else. Ah yeah I myself made this suggestion a while ago :) +1 Nevertheless |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
285
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 17:36:00 -
[13] - Quote
Moonracer2000 wrote:I've also said you should get hack assist points for covering your team while they hack. That way you don't get 3 people facing a console all getting shot in the back because no one wanted to miss out on points. If you are 10 meters from a hack taking place you are helping.
The system should reward players for doing the right thing instead of encouraging them to play poorly.
Effectively turning nulls into squad defend orders r.e. wp.
+1 |
Brush Master
HavoK Core
163
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 17:44:00 -
[14] - Quote
Seen it suggested before but yes definitely should be. I think you should actually get more points for stopping a hack just because it takes longer to disarm a hack then to hack it. |
Sha Kharn Clone
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1087
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 17:54:00 -
[15] - Quote
OP haz 24 likes and climbing. CCP listen up yo
Stupid it gives no points. |
Lion Redstar
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
66
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 09:37:00 -
[16] - Quote
+GêP
Players should be rewarded for this. |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
1155
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 12:50:00 -
[17] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:There is no incentive for players to resecure an objective after the enemy has hacked it. It takes longer to secure and you should get points for it.
Players, now, deliberately allow the hack to go through so they can get the points for hacking it. Meanwhile, the enemy does damage to the MCC and they spawn right behind you on the objective.
Players need points to resecure an objective
Max agreed. Been said over and over and over again. And still no fix. Stopping an hack of an objective should earn same amount of point, or even more than a regular hack. |
Cyn Bruin
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
653
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 13:42:00 -
[18] - Quote
Joe Darkwater wrote:Read this somewhere else. Ah yeah I myself made this suggestion a while ago :) +1 Nevertheless
Yea this subject has come up alot, this isn't the first suggestion. It's just that CCP has more important things going on than fixing this minor issue to them.
This is somewhat of a big issue to us though. If MCC shields/armor are = in match and in no threat of losing, why would I want to rehack asap a point of contention? Since no warpoints why not just let it cap and then recap it for 100?
I'd say give us 50pts for every rehack and move along. |
Mode Torsen
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
11
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 17:25:00 -
[19] - Quote
+1
CCP- reward us for EVERYTHING WE DO.
FPS is about rewards. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 17:45:00 -
[20] - Quote
Cyn Bruin wrote:Joe Darkwater wrote:Read this somewhere else. Ah yeah I myself made this suggestion a while ago :) +1 Nevertheless Yea this subject has come up alot, this isn't the first suggestion. It's just that CCP has more important things going on than fixing this minor issue to them. This is somewhat of a big issue to us though. If MCC shields/armor are = in match and in no threat of losing, why would I want to rehack asap a point of contention? Since no warpoints why not just let it cap and then recap it for 100? I'd say give us 50pts for every rehack and move along.
This is why we need to keep throwing this at them. CCP...EVERYONE in this game agrees to this.....it should be in the next hotfix (especially since our fragoed warpoints were reduced by half in a hotfix) |
|
|
CyriusBloodbane
Mercs and Capsuleers
3
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 17:50:00 -
[21] - Quote
I would say even make the points more than capping an objective. If you really think about it it takes MORE skill to resecure it as usually if they made it to the console to secure the defenders were wiped out. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 17:53:00 -
[22] - Quote
CyriusBloodbane wrote:I would say even make the points more than capping an objective. If you really think about it it takes MORE skill to resecure it as usually if they made it to the console to secure the defenders were wiped out.
Agreed....however, if they give us 75wps, I'll be satisfied. Even if they gave us 50, I'll keep my mouth shut but they need to give us somethng. |
KEROSIINI-TERO
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
248
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 19:10:00 -
[23] - Quote
+1 |
NeoprotoD
Zumari Force Projection
Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 22:29:00 -
[24] - Quote
The entire WP system needs some attention, logi, rehack, hack assist, points based on %hack rather than 100 for first and 50 for 2nd the list goes on...
+1 to this for sure |
Ops Fox
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
197
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 20:55:00 -
[25] - Quote
Bump CCP you will hear us |
corbear Ormand
Algintal Core
Gallente Federation
18
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 20:58:00 -
[26] - Quote
+1 this is needed, even if it's just 50 points. |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1062
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 21:39:00 -
[27] - Quote
Can I make 2 more characters to +1 this? |
ugg reset
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
234
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 23:03:00 -
[28] - Quote
Agreed. atm though i find it safer to hack it back that to try and stop there hack. |
2-Ton Twenty-One
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
235
|
Posted - 2012.11.04 06:41:00 -
[29] - Quote
+1 |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
220
|
Posted - 2012.11.04 14:06:00 -
[30] - Quote
This is the single issue I think has the highest importance:ease of fixing ratio.
I'm guessing nothing will get changed before the tournament's over but is totally and utterly necessary ASAP |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |