DUST Search - The things that set dust 514 apart as a shooter

All Channels

General Discussions

The things that set dust 514 apart as a shooter

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Saiibot Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 142	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:23:00 - [1] - Quote uhhhhhhhhhh........ hmmmmmmmmmm...... Cant think of a damn thing
Veigar Mordekaiser Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 676	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:25:00 - [2] - Quote Skill diversity. EVE interaction. Universe size. Persistence. There are the ones that catch my eye.
Sees-Too-Much 332	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:26:00 - [3] - Quote Oh my god, you're right! I will immediately stop enjoying playing this game, because of your incredibly insightful post! Thank you! Thank you so much.
Saiibot Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 142	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:27:00 - [4] - Quote Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: Skill diversity. EVE interaction. Universe size. Persistence. There are the ones that catch my eye. How about the actual SHOOTER aspects of the game?
Sniper no Sniping Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 21	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:27:00 - [5] - Quote MMORTFPSRPG (Massively Multiplayer Online, Real-Time First Person Shooter, Role Playing Game)
Veigar Mordekaiser Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 676	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:29:00 - [6] - Quote Saiibot wrote: How about the actual SHOOTER aspects of the game? Alright, *-EVE interaction- -battle persistence- -skill diversity-*. 3/4 of the things I said have an effect on the shooter aspect of the game.
Super Cargo Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 428	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:29:00 - [7] - Quote Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: Skill diversity. EVE interaction. Universe size. Persistence. There are the ones that catch my eye. This guy has got it. Unfortunately the shooting mechanics make the game fall flat on its face. It's ironic that the weakest element of DUST is what defines its genre. FIX THE DAMN GUNS
Skihids Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising 969	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:30:00 - [8] - Quote It's not just a bunch of egos crowing about their KDR and trash talking everyone else? Outside of the High Sec sandbox it will be completely objective based? There are significant support roles?
TEBOW BAGGINS FIREFLY ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED TACNET 549	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:32:00 - [9] - Quote It's a war simulator not a "real FPS"
Dr Debo Galaxy GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention 195	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:32:00 - [10] - Quote the commander skill type. In the market they can put down command nodes/turret installations/etc. The logistics system, so many choice so much time. The seeded universe. Orbital strikes plans for the next year of updates.not three month out and then done roles corps and spys and assets passive skill system as well as active it is free i'm sure there are more but these are the ones i don't really see in other games.

Veigar Mordekaiser Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 676	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:32:00 - [11] - Quote Super Cargo wrote: This guy has got it. Unfortunately the shooting mechanics make the game fall flat on its face. It's ironic that the weakest element of DUST is what defines its genre. FIX THE DAMN GUNS The actually FPS gameplay felt great in E3, and is not so great in Precursor. I've taken to using KBM - I think they improved it slightly since the first couple days - as I have rather severe input lag on the DS3, and the deadzones are horrendous as well.
Veigar Mordekaiser Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 676	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:34:00 - [12] - Quote TEBOW BAGGINS wrote: It's a war simulator not a "real FPS" As far as I can tell, it's in first person, and you shoot things, doesn't get any more "real" than that. Next people will start saying Wolfienstein 3D wasn't a real FPS.
Crimson MoonV Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 658	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:35:00 - [13] - Quote The things that set dust 514 apart as a shooter? The gun game play is complete **** compared to most other AAA fps on console. (That's not saying much either) The health is to high while the movement speed is to slow. Makes for boring slow game play. The equation is all messed up and the maps are to big. The only people that still think this game is good are the people wearing ccp fanboy sunglasses. You won't be able to see the truth through those shades. I would say that sets it apart from other shooters.
Saiibot Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 142	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:36:00 - [14] - Quote Super Cargo wrote: Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: Skill diversity. EVE interaction. Universe size. Persistence. There are the ones that catch my eye. This guy has got it. Unfortunately the shooting mechanics make the game fall flat on its face. It's ironic that the weakest element of DUST is what defines its genre. FIX THE DAMN GUNS You hit the hammer on the head! All these guys are dancing outside and around the actual gameplay mechanics itself when i ask how it sets itself apart when their clone's actual boots hit the ground
Saiibot Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 142	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:37:00 - [15] - Quote Crimson MoonV wrote: The things that set dust 514 apart as a shooter? The gun game play is complete **** compared to most other AAA fps on console. (That's not saying much either) The health is to high while the movement speed is to slow. Makes for boring slow game play. The equation is all messed up and the maps are to big. The only people that still think this game is good are the people wearing ccp fanboy sunglasses. You won't be able to see the truth through those shades. I would say that sets it apart from other shooters. Excellent observation!
Saiibot Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 142	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:41:00 - [16] - Quote TEBOW BAGGINS wrote: It's a war simulator not a "real FPS" Soooo.... it fails in its targeted genre is what you're saying?
Forlorn Destrier ZionTCD Legacy Rising 914	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:43:00 - [17] - Quote TEBOW BAGGINS wrote: It's a war simulator not a "real FPS" This seems accurate to me.
Veigar Mordekaiser Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 676	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:44:00 - [18] - Quote You can't make a judgement about a game that isn't out yet. I don't like Precursor, I'm not enjoying it nearly as much as I was enjoying E3, but I'm not about to say Dust is bad. Saying Dust is bad now, would be like playing Starcraft: Brood War 8 years ago and saying "Man, Starcraft 2 really sucks!".
Mr TamiyaCowboy Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation 121	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:46:00 - [19] - Quote Joining a game to get a server full then you join another game and your fittings are all INVALID. and your PS3 decides it should crash and burn when dust does. thats setting dust apart from all other FPS for me right now. broken things do not mend themselves.
Saiibot Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 142	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:50:00 - [20] - Quote Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: You can't make a judgement about a game that isn't out yet. I don't like Precursor, I'm not enjoying it nearly as much as I was enjoying E3, but I'm not about to say Dust is bad. Saying Dust is bad now, would be like playing Starcraft: Brood War 8 years ago and saying "Man, Starcraft 2 really sucks!". The game is tentatively slated to go live 6-8 weeks from now..... how much better do you think it'll get?!?

Paran Tadec Imperfects Negative-Feedback 902	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:51:00 - [21] - Quote Saiibot wrote: uhhhhhhhhhh........ hmmmmmmmmmm...... Cant think of a damn thing Door is this way >>>>>>>>>>>>
Veigar Mordekaiser Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 676	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:51:00 - [22] - Quote Saiibot wrote: Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: You can't make a judgement about a game that isn't out yet. I don't like Precursor, I'm not enjoying it nearly as much as I was enjoying E3, but I'm not about to say Dust is bad. Saying Dust is bad now, would be like playing Starcraft: Brood War 8 years ago and saying "Man, Starcraft 2 really sucks!". The game is tentatively slated to go live 6-8 weeks from now..... how much better do you think it'll get?!? Actually It could go live December 31st and still be a "2012 release". Personally, I think they're going to have a late release, and I don't really mind that. That aside, we are also a couple builds behind what they have in house.
Saiibot Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 142	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:52:00 - [23] - Quote TEBOW BAGGINS wrote: It's a war simulator not a "real FPS" "war simulator"!?! WTF!!
Veigar Mordekaiser Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 676	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:53:00 - [24] - Quote Saiibot wrote: TEBOW BAGGINS wrote: It's a war simulator not a "real FPS" "war simulator"!?! WTF!! Persistence, scale, corporations, sov wars. It's not just a quick match, win/lose, repeat.
STB Vermaak Doe 558	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:54:00 - [25] - Quote Saiibot wrote: TEBOW BAGGINS wrote: It's a war simulator not a "real FPS" "war simulator"!?! WTF!! War sim for the eve universe
Saiibot Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 142	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:55:00 - [26] - Quote Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: Saiibot wrote: Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: You can't make a judgement about a game that isn't out yet. I don't like Precursor, I'm not enjoying it nearly as much as I was enjoying E3, but I'm not about to say Dust is bad. Saying Dust is bad now, would be like playing Starcraft: Brood War 8 years ago and saying "Man, Starcraft 2 really sucks!". The game is tentatively slated to go live 6-8 weeks from now..... how much better do you think it'll get?!? Actually It could go live December 31st and still be a "2012 release". Personally, I think they're going to have a late release, and I don't really mind that. That aside, we are also a couple builds behind what they have in house. Uhhh.... They've been advertising a Fall release! Although with the way the beta is going, maybe next spring would be best
Veigar Mordekaiser Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 676	Posted - 2012.08.23 19:59:00 - [27] - Quote Saiibot wrote: Uhhh.... They've been advertising a Fall release! Although with the way the beta is going, maybe next spring would be best Wouldn't be the first time a game was released late, and I don't think it's gonna cause anybody any problems.
Rafari Katelok Clann Fian 6	Posted - 2012.08.23 20:00:00 - [28] - Quote Saiibot wrote: Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: Saiibot wrote: Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: You can't make a judgement about a game that isn't out yet. I don't like Precursor, I'm not enjoying it nearly as much as I was enjoying E3, but I'm not about to say Dust is bad. Saying Dust is bad now, would be like playing Starcraft: Brood War 8 years ago and saying "Man, Starcraft 2 really sucks!". The game is tentatively slated to go live 6-8 weeks from now..... how much better do you think it'll get?!? Actually It could go live December 31st and still be a "2012 release". Personally, I think they're going to have a late release, and I don't really mind that. That aside, we are also a couple builds behind what they have in house. Uhhh.... They've been advertising a Fall release! Although with the way the beta is going, maybe next spring would be best Besides the same ol rehashed shooters and other calamities, how many games have you played that come out on time? Most get delayed at some point unless the game is just the same rehashed crap we get every year. I for one thing it is coming out next year and will blow other games out of the water.
Crimson MoonV Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 658	Posted - 2012.08.23 20:07:00 - [29] - Quote Paran Tadec wrote: Saiibot wrote: uhhhhhhhhhh........ hmmmmmmmmmm...... Cant think of a damn thing Door is this way >>>>>>>>>>>> Even though some of us see the potential fail dust 514 is becoming, that doesn't mean we don't want this game to do well. So STFU with your GTFO BS. I will leave when this game goes up in flames and then I'm going to laugh about it. I want a good mmofps on console so I hope this doesn't happen. pay to talk. grind to win. kitten fps gameplay. dust is going in the wrong direction fast.
Templar Two Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 459	Posted - 2012.08.23 20:08:00 - [30] - Quote Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: ...we are also a couple builds behind what they have in house. So for you they are letting us test something they already changed? Really for what purpose: if what we test is already old/changed then we are all wasting time No my friend you lie to yourself on this: in a beta you don't test a build 2-3 months old, you test the latest build. If like many of you suggest/hope CCP has a better build, a completely superior one with perfect gameplay, and they are not letting us test it then all this beta is a farce aned we are all wasting time....we palyers and CCP alike. No people CCP doesn't have Dust 515 hidden in a closet and they are waiting to show it to say "surprise, we din't need your testing, we did it all alone and better". You judge Dust on your "future hopes" and blindly deny the reality of things: Dust 514 is here and now, judge form what you paly it here an now.



Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.