|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Saiibot
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
142
   |
Posted - 2012.08.23 19:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
uhhhhhhhhhh........ hmmmmmmmmmm...... Cant think of a damn thing |
Saiibot
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
142
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 19:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:Skill diversity.
EVE interaction.
Universe size.
Persistence.
There are the ones that catch my eye.
How about the actual SHOOTER aspects of the game?  |
Saiibot
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
142
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 19:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
Super Cargo wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:Skill diversity.
EVE interaction.
Universe size.
Persistence.
There are the ones that catch my eye. This guy has got it. Unfortunately the shooting mechanics make the game fall flat on its face. It's ironic that the weakest element of DUST is what defines its genre. FIX THE DAMN GUNS
You hit the hammer on the head! All these guys are dancing outside and around the actual gameplay mechanics itself when i ask how it sets itself apart when their clone's actual boots hit the ground |
Saiibot
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
142
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 19:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
Crimson MoonV wrote:The things that set dust 514 apart as a shooter?
The gun game play is complete **** compared to most other AAA fps on console. (That's not saying much either) The health is to high while the movement speed is to slow. Makes for boring slow game play. The equation is all messed up and the maps are to big. The only people that still think this game is good are the people wearing ccp fanboy sunglasses. You won't be able to see the truth through those shades.
I would say that sets it apart from other shooters.
Excellent observation! |
Saiibot
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
142
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 19:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
TEBOW BAGGINS wrote:It's a war simulator not a "real FPS"
Soooo.... it fails in its targeted genre is what you're saying? |
Saiibot
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
142
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 19:50:00 -
[6] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:You can't make a judgement about a game that isn't out yet. I don't like Precursor, I'm not enjoying it nearly as much as I was enjoying E3, but I'm not about to say Dust is bad. Saying Dust is bad now, would be like playing Starcraft: Brood War 8 years ago and saying "Man, Starcraft 2 really sucks!".
The game is tentatively slated to go live 6-8 weeks from now..... how much better do you think it'll get?!? |
Saiibot
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
142
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 19:52:00 -
[7] - Quote
TEBOW BAGGINS wrote:It's a war simulator not a "real FPS"
"war simulator"!?! WTF!! |
Saiibot
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
142
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 19:55:00 -
[8] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:Saiibot wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:You can't make a judgement about a game that isn't out yet. I don't like Precursor, I'm not enjoying it nearly as much as I was enjoying E3, but I'm not about to say Dust is bad. Saying Dust is bad now, would be like playing Starcraft: Brood War 8 years ago and saying "Man, Starcraft 2 really sucks!". The game is tentatively slated to go live 6-8 weeks from now..... how much better do you think it'll get?!? Actually It could go live December 31st and still be a "2012 release". Personally, I think they're going to have a late release, and I don't really mind that. That aside, we are also a couple builds behind what they have in house.
Uhhh.... They've been advertising a Fall release! Although with the way the beta is going, maybe next spring would be best |
Saiibot
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
142
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 20:21:00 -
[9] - Quote
Rafari Katelok wrote:Saiibot wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:Saiibot wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:You can't make a judgement about a game that isn't out yet. I don't like Precursor, I'm not enjoying it nearly as much as I was enjoying E3, but I'm not about to say Dust is bad. Saying Dust is bad now, would be like playing Starcraft: Brood War 8 years ago and saying "Man, Starcraft 2 really sucks!". The game is tentatively slated to go live 6-8 weeks from now..... how much better do you think it'll get?!? Actually It could go live December 31st and still be a "2012 release". Personally, I think they're going to have a late release, and I don't really mind that. That aside, we are also a couple builds behind what they have in house. Uhhh.... They've been advertising a Fall release! Although with the way the beta is going, maybe next spring would be best Besides the same ol rehashed shooters and other calamities, how many games have you played that come out on time? Most get delayed at some point unless the game is just the same rehashed crap we get every year. I for one thing it is coming out next year and will blow other games out of the water.
As a matter of fact a high percentage of games that i've played have come out ON TIME n i have not been disappointed |
Saiibot
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
142
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 01:19:00 -
[10] - Quote
Mister Hunt wrote:Mr TamiyaCowboy wrote:
Joining a game to get a server full
then you join another game and your fittings are all INVALID.
and your PS3 decides it should crash and burn when dust does.
thats setting dust apart from all other FPS for me right now. broken things do not mend themselves.
It is called a Beta. Do you know what that means? That means the game isn't finished yet.
The frequent freezes and crashes along with 'INVALID FITTING' disclaimer when it shouldn't exist, is all discrepancies that should have been worked out in the ALPHA |
|
|
|
|
| |
|