DUST Search - Simple easy things to make Dust better

All Channels

General Discussions

Simple easy things to make Dust better

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
LHughes Little Boy Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 1	Posted - 2016.01.21 20:34:00 - [1] - Quote NO TALKING ABOUT BEING ABLE TO PLAY THE GAME, WE KNOW THE SERVERS ARE ****** AT THE MOMENT!!! Now to business, just a list of what I think are easy to implement changes, feel free to add some more (easy to implement) ideas. - Shield variants of FG and swarms and armor variant of PLC. Very simple to add, would balance tanks out a lot more. - Already being said but a change to either the stamina usage of myofibs or change them to equipment (CCP said they were to reach new areas not for combat) - Heavy buff, I hate heavies but lets be honest they need maybe an extra 500HP (maybe lower speed after all they are for defense, You shouldn't be able to wiggle wiggle beat them 1v1) - Take equipment slot from Assaults and give scouts just 1 (I know most would disagree but it would be a decent buff for logis and increase overall teamwork) -Put a stacking penalty on PC districts to encourage more room for others to PC (However it's implemented I don't care, maybe 2/5% less clones reinforcements per district held) - Keep 10% of whatever suit and/or gun you kill in pubs (on top of WP payout), would encourage people to kill more proto rather than farm newbs (100 STD suits = 30k ISK, killing just 10 PRO suits = 57 ISK) Logi's, AV & tankers usually get more WPs which negates this. - No squads in pubs, Que the bitching! I'm sure there's somethings I've missed but what would you's want to see that CCP would have a hard time saying "SoonTM" or "we don't have the resources" If they can make the sh*tty AURUMbarge then they can do all of the above.
Sbundo'D Dead Meta Game 324	Posted - 2016.01.21 20:43:00 - [2] - Quote Now this is a refreshing forum post practical gameplay changes that are relevant to what we already have in Dust514 rather than fanboy fantasy, where we all blab about changes never going to happen Shame all you'll get is a ban But at least the community knows.. While CCP make changes to suit an underage audience... Hughes changes suit for an audience with the underage
YUUKI TERUMI Th3.Immortals Shadow of Dust 194	Posted - 2016.01.21 20:54:00 - [3] - Quote LHughes Little Boy wrote: NO TALKING ABOUT BEING ABLE TO PLAY THE GAME, WE KNOW THE SERVERS ARE ****** AT THE MOMENT!!! Now to business, just a list of what I think are easy to implement changes, feel free to add some more (easy to implement) ideas. - Shield variants of FG and swarms and armor variant of PLC. Very simple to add, would balance tanks out a lot more. - Already being said but a change to either the stamina usage of myofibs or change them to equipment (CCP said they were to reach new areas not for combat) - Heavy buff, I hate heavies but lets be honest they need maybe an extra 500HP (maybe lower speed after all they are for defense, You shouldn't be able to wiggle wiggle beat them 1v1) - Take equipment slot from Assaults and give scouts just 1 (I know most would disagree but it would be a decent buff for logis and increase overall teamwork) -Put a stacking penalty on PC districts to encourage more room for others to PC (However it's implemented I don't care, maybe 2/5% less clones reinforcements per district held) - Keep 10% of whatever suit and/or gun you kill in pubs (on top of WP payout), would encourage people to kill more proto rather than farm newbs (100 STD suits = 30k ISK, killing just 10 PRO suits = 57 ISK) Logi's, AV & tankers usually get more WPs which negates this. - No squads in pubs, Que the bitching! I'm sure there's somethings I've missed but what would you's want to see that CCP would have a hard time saying "SoonTM" or "we don't have the resources" If they can make the sh*tty AURUMbarge then they can do all of the above. can i touch you lilboy? All I can say is: meh PortDust514
LHughes Little Boy Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 6	Posted - 2016.01.21 23:18:00 - [4] - Quote My master says no <3
Abraxis Mangelor Breach Team 39	Posted - 2016.01.22 01:01:00 - [5] - Quote LHughes Little Boy wrote: NO TALKING ABOUT BEING ABLE TO PLAY THE GAME, WE KNOW THE SERVERS ARE ****** AT THE MOMENT!!! Now to business, just a list of what I think are easy to implement changes, feel free to add some more (easy to implement) ideas. - Shield variants of FG and swarms and armor variant of PLC. Very simple to add, would balance tanks out a lot more. - Already being said but a change to either the stamina usage of myofibs or change them to equipment (CCP said they were to reach new areas not for combat) - Heavy buff, I hate heavies but lets be honest they need maybe an extra 500HP (maybe lower speed after all they are for defense, You shouldn't be able to wiggle wiggle beat them 1v1) - Take equipment slot from Assaults and give scouts just 1 (I know most would disagree but it would be a decent buff for logis and increase overall teamwork) -Put a stacking penalty on PC districts to encourage more room for others to PC (However it's implemented I don't care, maybe 2/5% less clones reinforcements per district held) - Keep 10% of whatever suit and/or gun you kill in pubs (on top of WP payout), would encourage people to kill more proto rather than farm newbs (100 STD suits = 30k ISK, killing just 10 PRO suits = 57 ISK) Logi's, AV & tankers usually get more WPs which negates this. - No squads in pubs, Que the bitching! I'm sure there's somethings I've missed but what would you's want to see that CCP would have a hard time saying "SoonTM" or "we don't have the resources" If they can make the sh*tty AURUMbarge then they can do all of the above. Too bad all of it would require coding, playtesting, balancing, retesting, re-balancing, more coding, more playtesting, then finally to be released as a super bugged game breaker. What you are proposing won't be balanced at all....
LHughes Little Boy Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 9	Posted - 2016.01.22 09:58:00 - [6] - Quote Abraxis Mangelor wrote: LHughes Little Boy wrote: NO TALKING ABOUT BEING ABLE TO PLAY THE GAME, WE KNOW THE SERVERS ARE ****** AT THE MOMENT!!! Now to business, just a list of what I think are easy to implement changes, feel free to add some more (easy to implement) ideas. - Shield variants of FG and swarms and armor variant of PLC. Very simple to add, would balance tanks out a lot more. - Already being said but a change to either the stamina usage of myofibs or change them to equipment (CCP said they were to reach new areas not for combat) - Heavy buff, I hate heavies but lets be honest they need maybe an extra 500HP (maybe lower speed after all they are for defense, You shouldn't be able to wiggle wiggle beat them 1v1) - Take equipment slot from Assaults and give scouts just 1 (I know most would disagree but it would be a decent buff for logis and increase overall teamwork) -Put a stacking penalty on PC districts to encourage more room for others to PC (However it's implemented I don't care, maybe 2/5% less clones reinforcements per district held) - Keep 10% of whatever suit and/or gun you kill in pubs (on top of WP payout), would encourage people to kill more proto rather than farm newbs (100 STD suits = 30k ISK, killing just 10 PRO suits = 57 ISK) Logi's, AV & tankers usually get more WPs which negates this. - No squads in pubs, Que the bitching! I'm sure there's somethings I've missed but what would you's want to see that CCP would have a hard time saying "SoonTM" or "we don't have the resources" If they can make the shtty AURUMbarge then they can do all of the above. Too bad all of it would require coding, playtesting, balancing, retesting, re-balancing, more coding, more playtesting, then finally to be released as a super bugged game breaker. What you are proposing won't be balanced at all.... So why do we have Devs then you moron? It's *** easy to implement. you're just being controversal for the sake of it
Hawkings Greenback Dead Man's Game Preatoriani 510	Posted - 2016.01.22 12:59:00 - [7] - Quote LHughes Little Boy wrote: Abraxis Mangelor wrote: LHughes Little Boy wrote: NO TALKING ABOUT BEING ABLE TO PLAY THE GAME, WE KNOW THE SERVERS ARE ****** AT THE MOMENT!!! Now to business, just a list of what I think are easy to implement changes, feel free to add some more (easy to implement) ideas. - Shield variants of FG and swarms and armor variant of PLC. Very simple to add, would balance tanks out a lot more. - Already being said but a change to either the stamina usage of myofibs or change them to equipment (CCP said they were to reach new areas not for combat) - Heavy buff, I hate heavies but lets be honest they need maybe an extra 500HP (maybe lower speed after all they are for defense, You shouldn't be able to wiggle wiggle beat them 1v1) - Take equipment slot from Assaults and give scouts just 1 (I know most would disagree but it would be a decent buff for logis and increase overall teamwork) -Put a stacking penalty on PC districts to encourage more room for others to PC (However it's implemented I don't care, maybe 2/5% less clones reinforcements per district held) - Keep 10% of whatever suit and/or gun you kill in pubs (on top of WP payout), would encourage people to kill more proto rather than farm newbs (100 STD suits = 30k ISK, killing just 10 PRO suits = 57 ISK) Logi's, AV & tankers usually get more WPs which negates this. - No squads in pubs, Que the bitching! I'm sure there's somethings I've missed but what would you's want to see that CCP would have a hard time saying "SoonTM" or "we don't have the resources" If they can make the shtty AURUMbarge then they can do all of the above. Too bad all of it would require coding, playtesting, balancing, retesting, re-balancing, more coding, more playtesting, then finally to be released as a super bugged game breaker. What you are proposing won't be balanced at all.... So why do we have Devs then you moron? It's *** easy to implement. you're just being controversal for the sake of it Hughes in a non controversial post shocker. Also have you been taking posting lessons from TheD1CK ? Welcome to Dust. The bitter, salty taste is a feature just like the lag.
Satanic Fister Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire 101	Posted - 2016.01.22 13:33:00 - [8] - Quote I keep suggesting no squads in pubs but this community is so conceited that having one area without squads completely breaks the game and is unfair to casual players... that makes no **** in sense seeing as how it is now it not ducking fair for the casual solo players. "It's like a porcupine with down syndrome... you know it wants hugs but they don't know the pain they cause..."
Ankbar Latrommi Roghnaigh Do Scrios 172	Posted - 2016.01.22 13:42:00 - [9] - Quote LHughes Little Boy wrote: - Take equipment slot from Assaults and give scouts just 1 (I know most would disagree but it would be a decent buff for logis and increase overall teamwork) Doesn't that leave equipment only to Logi suits? If so, what's the point of their suit bonus? It only differentiates btwn the logi suits. Quote: -Put a stacking penalty on PC districts to encourage more room for others to PC (However it's implemented I don't care, maybe 2/5% less clones reinforcements per district held) +10 Quote: - No squads in pubs Why would mercenaries--whom are already grouped into corporations--then take contracts on an individual basis? Why would corporations wishing to conquer or defend facilities hire 16 individual mercenaries instead of hiring groups already working in firesquads(i.e.: perform better)? Reiner Knizia-"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning." Eve> FPS
Happy Violentime 1	Posted - 2016.01.22 13:45:00 - [10] - Quote Ankbar Latrommi wrote: Quote: - No squads in pubs Why would mercenaries--whom are already grouped into corporations--then take contracts on an individual basis? Why would corporations wishing to conquer or defend facilities hire 16 individual mercenaries instead of hiring groups already working in firesquads(i.e.: perform better)? Its a game dude, for reasons of better gameplay.

Happy Violentime 1	Posted - 2016.01.22 13:48:00 - [11] - Quote LHughes Little Boy wrote: NO TALKING ABOUT BEING ABLE TO PLAY THE GAME, WE KNOW THE SERVERS ARE ****** AT THE MOMENT!!! Now to business, just a list of what I think are easy to implement changes, feel free to add some more (easy to implement) ideas. - Shield variants of FG and swarms and armor variant of PLC. Very simple to add, would balance tanks out a lot more. - Already being said but a change to either the stamina usage of myofibs or change them to equipment (CCP said they were to reach new areas not for combat) - Heavy buff, I hate heavies but lets be honest they need maybe an extra 500HP (maybe lower speed after all they are for defense, You shouldn't be able to wiggle wiggle beat them 1v1) - Take equipment slot from Assaults and give scouts just 1 (I know most would disagree but it would be a decent buff for logis and increase overall teamwork) -Put a stacking penalty on PC districts to encourage more room for others to PC (However it's implemented I don't care, maybe 2/5% less clones reinforcements per district held) - Keep 10% of whatever suit and/or gun you kill in pubs (on top of WP payout), would encourage people to kill more proto rather than farm newbs (100 STD suits = 30k ISK, killing just 10 PRO suits = 57 ISK) Logi's, AV & tankers usually get more WPs which negates this. - No squads in pubs, Que the bitching! I'm sure there's somethings I've missed but what would you's want to see that CCP would have a hard time saying "SoonTM" or "we don't have the resources" If they can make the sh*tty AURUMbarge then they can do all of the above. If we're removing the 2nd eq from scouts can they all be given a proto cloak please? kthxbai
Ankbar Latrommi Roghnaigh Do Scrios 172	Posted - 2016.01.22 13:48:00 - [12] - Quote Happy Violentime wrote: Ankbar Latrommi wrote: Quote: - No squads in pubs Why would mercenaries--whom are already grouped into corporations--then take contracts on an individual basis? Why would corporations wishing to conquer or defend facilities hire 16 individual mercenaries instead of hiring groups already working in firesquads(i.e.: perform better)? Its a game dude, for reasons of better gameplay. There are many ways people enjoy games. Immersion is one such way. If it doesn't make sense, it's a lesser idea in my book. Reiner Knizia-"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning." Eve> FPS
Happy Violentime 1	Posted - 2016.01.22 13:52:00 - [13] - Quote And all items need to made tradeable - I'm sat on so much stuff I'll never use - boosters, I have a bunch of 1 day 3 day and 7 day boosters I'll never use them cos I cant face playing more than a couple of games a day. I need to be able to sell these to some dumb masochist. Fairly sure it wouldn't take more than 2 seconds to write a script to tick the 'make tradeable' box in the Database.
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 3	Posted - 2016.01.22 13:53:00 - [14] - Quote LHughes Little Boy wrote: NO TALKING ABOUT BEING ABLE TO PLAY THE GAME, WE KNOW THE SERVERS ARE ****** AT THE MOMENT!!! Now to business, just a list of what I think are easy to implement changes, feel free to add some more (easy to implement) ideas. - Shield variants of FG and swarms and armor variant of PLC. Very simple to add, would balance tanks out a lot more. Suggested when we were still here never happened - Already being said but a change to either the stamina usage of myofibs or change them to equipment (CCP said they were to reach new areas not for combat) Not my business carry on. - Heavy buff, I hate heavies but lets be honest they need maybe an extra 500HP (maybe lower speed after all they are for defense, You shouldn't be able to wiggle wiggle beat them 1v1) I take it you weren't here when heavy suits could brick to 1900 eHP, didn't end well. The problem is hit detection not heavy strength. - Take equipment slot from Assaults and give scouts just 1 (I know most would disagree but it would be a decent buff for logis and increase overall teamwork) Would also be a buff to vehicles and Ants-Nester's, defeats the purpose of the scout. -Put a stacking penalty on PC districts to encourage more room for others to PC (However it's implemented I don't care, maybe 2/5% less clones reinforcements per district held) Didn't they try that already? - Keep 10% of whatever suit and/or gun you kill in pubs (on top of WP payout), would encourage people to kill more proto rather than farm newbs (100 STD suits = 30k ISK, killing just 10 PRO suits = 57 ISK) Logi's, AV & tankers usually get more WPs which negates this. Add vehicle costs to this for AVers, 1% for friendly revives and it might be fair. - No squads in pubs, Que the bitching! This was suggested before, you got fire Team's I'm sure there's somethings I've missed but what would you's want to see that CCP would have a hard time saying "SoonTM" or "we don't have the resources" If they can make the shtty AURUMbarge then they can do all of the above. They call me the Monkey - I like to jump off sh* and piss RE's all over your tank! Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior Lvl 3
Happy Violentime 1	Posted - 2016.01.22 13:56:00 - [15] - Quote Ankbar Latrommi wrote: Happy Violentime wrote: Ankbar Latrommi wrote: Quote: - No squads in pubs Why would mercenaries--whom are already grouped into corporations--then take contracts on an individual basis? Why would corporations wishing to conquer or defend facilities hire 16 individual mercenaries instead of hiring groups already working in firesquads(i.e.: perform better)? Its a game dude, for reasons of better gameplay. There are many ways people enjoy games. Immersion is one such way. If it doesn't make sense, it's a lesser idea in my book. I didn't mention enjoyment. It doesnt break immersion. You have no point.
Ankbar Latrommi Roghnaigh Do Scrios 172	Posted - 2016.01.22 14:03:00 - [16] - Quote Happy Violentime wrote: Ankbar Latrommi wrote: Happy Violentime wrote: Ankbar Latrommi wrote: Quote: - No squads in pubs Why would mercenaries--whom are already grouped into corporations--then take contracts on an individual basis? Why would corporations wishing to conquer or defend facilities hire 16 individual mercenaries instead of hiring groups already working in firesquads(i.e.: perform better)? Its a game dude, for reasons of better gameplay. There are many ways people enjoy games. Immersion is one such way. If it doesn't make sense, it's a lesser idea in my book. I didn't mention enjoyment. It doesnt break immersion. You have no point. To half-quote you, "It's a game dude," it is all about enjoyment. I described an unrealistic behavior out of sentient entities (corps & mercs.) If you don't feel that is immersion breaking I suggest that isn't because it doesn't break immersion but rather that you don't have as high sensitivity to immersion as me. And finally, don't be a d1ck. You not agreeing or valuing my point does not mean I don't have a point. Debate logically. Reiner Knizia-"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning." Eve> FPS
Happy Violentime 1	Posted - 2016.01.22 14:59:00 - [17] - Quote I'm on a phone dude, not really conducive to addressing you points in detail. I would say its more immersion breaking for these same corporations to consistently employ rubbish mercs for their contracts, but that is what they seem to do in 99% of all public contracts. Matchmaking is broke, squads make it more broke, removing squads from pubs 'may' help and the game might actually be enjoyable for all 32 players in the game. Im sorry if this breaks the nonexistent immersion you are talking about, maybe you'll get over it in time? Alternatively pretend pubs dont exist and go immerse yourself in FW or PC?
Adipem Nothi Nos Nothi 18	Posted - 2016.01.22 15:04:00 - [18] - Quote Happy Violentime wrote: removing squads from pubs 'may' help. Why not start with one mode and see if it improves battle quality? Dropsuit Usage Rates
Adipem Nothi Nos Nothi 18	Posted - 2016.01.22 15:06:00 - [19] - Quote Happy Violentime wrote: removing squads from pubs 'may' help. Instead of removing squads from pubs altogether, why not start with one mode and see if it helps? Dropsuit Usage Rates
Happy Violentime 1	Posted - 2016.01.22 15:06:00 - [20] - Quote Adipem Nothi wrote: Happy Violentime wrote: removing squads from pubs 'may' help. Why not start with one mode and see if it improves battle quality? I'm on EU server, we only have one mode LOL

Adipem Nothi Nos Nothi 18	Posted - 2016.01.22 15:29:00 - [21] - Quote Happy Violentime wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Happy Violentime wrote: removing squads from pubs 'may' help. Why not start with one mode and see if it improves battle quality? I'm on EU server, we only have one mode LOL Dropsuit Usage Rates
Abraxis Mangelor Breach Team 43	Posted - 2016.01.22 15:34:00 - [22] - Quote removing squads from pubs would completely break ewar and hand the game to scouts even more than now. The only way a suit heavier than an assault can see anything smaller than himself is with shared ewar, or a nerfed defenses. This game is designed with teamwork at it's core by having complementary roles. Removing that core would stupify it even farther.
Ripley Riley Incorruptibles 13	Posted - 2016.01.22 15:36:00 - [23] - Quote Adipem Nothi wrote: Instead of removing squads from pubs altogether, why not start with one mode and see if it helps? This idea will never come to fruition because we don't have the dev resources, I don't think... but I'm just throwing it out there as food for thought. Imagine if we had a rotating incentive to perform certain gamemodes. One potential way that could work is through the daily mission system. Add 'Complete X ambushes' or 'Win X skirmishes' or if we want to take it a step further 'Earn X WPs in skirmishes'. There is no penalty to ignore these missions, but it might gently more people out of their comfort zones (domination). Become the phoenix, rise again
Abraxis Mangelor Breach Team 43	Posted - 2016.01.22 15:41:00 - [24] - Quote Shield and armor buffer and rep rates are balanced intentionally. If you made opposite variants of current AV weapons, they would have to have such low damage they would be useless, or they would be so uber it would break the game. The different defensive systems are not equivalent. As intended. As used throughout all New Eden. Developing weapons to accomplish what you speak of would take WAY more man hours than CCP gives this product. By a huge margin.
LHughes Little Boy Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 17	Posted - 2016.01.22 15:45:00 - [25] - Quote Abraxis Mangelor wrote: Shield and armor buffer and rep rates are balanced intentionally. If you made opposite variants of current AV weapons, they would have to have such low damage they would be useless, or they would be so uber it would break the game. The different defensive systems are not equivalent. As intended. As used throughout all New Eden. Developing weapons to accomplish what you speak of would take WAY more man hours than CCP gives this product. By a huge margin. You're chatting sh*t, in all seriousness please stop commenting on this thread.
Abraxis Mangelor Breach Team 43	Posted - 2016.01.22 16:11:00 - [26] - Quote ... can you counter my points?
Satanic Fister Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire 102	Posted - 2016.01.22 16:16:00 - [27] - Quote K then what I'm seeing is everyone wants dom removed in favor of acquisition? "It's like a porcupine with down syndrome... you know it wants hugs but they don't know the pain they cause..."
7th Son 7 Hakuna Matatah Inc 1	Posted - 2016.01.22 16:25:00 - [28] - Quote Adipem Nothi wrote: Happy Violentime wrote: removing squads from pubs 'may' help. Why not start with one mode and see if it improves battle quality? yes Only your complete and total awareness is needed, nothing else will do. ----- OSHO
Ankbar Latrommi Roghnaigh Do Scrios 176	Posted - 2016.01.22 16:30:00 - [29] - Quote Happy Violentime wrote: I'm on a phone dude, not really conducive to addressing you points in detail. "I don't mind" is easier and more accurate than "You have no point." Quote: I would say its more immersion breaking for these same corporations to consistently employ rubbish mercs for their contracts, but that is what they seem to do in 99% of all public contracts. I agree, and there's something they can do about that, too, if they put their minds and will to it. Quote: Matchmaking is broke, squads make it more broke, If it can be said that squads further exacerbates broken matchmaking than it is potentially equally true that soloing exacerbates broken matchmaking. Unless there is evidence that 4 squads of 4 vs 4 squads of 4 don't matchmake as well as 16 solos vs 16 solos? And so, how about instead of removing squads from pubs CCP emphasizes squads? (Requiring them--which would be the most opposite approach to removing squads--we all know just wouldn't work. Concurrent player issues, deployment issues, and casual player needs make that so.) Quote: Im sorry if this breaks the nonexistent immersion you are talking about, maybe you'll get over it in time? Alternatively pretend pubs dont exist and go immerse yourself in FW or PC? Alternatively someone who doesn't care about immersion can choose the game designed and aimed better for their preferences (like one of the many triple-A lobby shooters,) instead of a game which is supposed to be an MMOFPS (mmo = world to immerse in)--regardless of how poorly that immersion may be implemented. Reiner Knizia-"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning." Eve> FPS
Soto Gallente 355	Posted - 2016.01.22 16:37:00 - [30] - Quote LHughes Little Boy wrote: NO TALKING ABOUT BEING ABLE TO PLAY THE GAME, WE KNOW THE SERVERS ARE ****** AT THE MOMENT!!! Now to business, just a list of what I think are easy to implement changes, feel free to add some more (easy to implement) ideas. - Shield variants of FG and swarms and armor variant of PLC. Very simple to add, would balance tanks out a lot more. - Already being said but a change to either the stamina usage of myofibs or change them to equipment (CCP said they were to reach new areas not for combat) - Heavy buff, I hate heavies but lets be honest they need maybe an extra 500HP (maybe lower speed after all they are for defense, You shouldn't be able to wiggle wiggle beat them 1v1) - Take equipment slot from Assaults and give scouts just 1 (I know most would disagree but it would be a decent buff for logis and increase overall teamwork) -Put a stacking penalty on PC districts to encourage more room for others to PC (However it's implemented I don't care, maybe 2/5% less clones reinforcements per district held) - Keep 10% of whatever suit and/or gun you kill in pubs (on top of WP payout), would encourage people to kill more proto rather than farm newbs (100 STD suits = 30k ISK, killing just 10 PRO suits = 57 ISK) Logi's, AV & tankers usually get more WPs which negates this. - No squads in pubs, Que the bitching! I'm sure there's somethings I've missed but what would you's want to see that CCP would have a hard time saying "SoonTM" or "we don't have the resources" If they can make the sh*tty AURUMbarge then they can do all of the above. -Yes I would like to see the Amarr get their own AV heavy weapon. For the armor varient of the PLC we have one, it's called the Breach Mass Driver -Myofibs are and have always been for combat even before their supposed "buff". -Heavies could use a buff, along with Sentinels as well -No way bro, I don't run Assault but I can tell you now it is supposed to be a versatile combat unit designed for any situation, and by taking their equipment slot away you take their versatility away. Also, how are Caldari Snipers supposed to get their ammo now? It would force them to either snipe as a scout or as a Commando, and some people don't like the Commando and prefer the Assault. On scouts, the reason why they gave them two equipment slots is because of the cloak, as it was pretty much guaranteed they would have a cloak on their suit, it is the almost the same as only having one equipment slot. Also, even with two equipment slot they only have EIGHT bandwidth, meaning they can't put down much equipment in the first place -I disagree with you on PC, it is called Planetary CONQUEST for a reason. That reason is conquering as much land as possible with the amount of people you have. Besides, there is already a means for more people to enter PC, it's called free attacks that cost only 25k CP and no isk at all -I happily agree with this one, "keep what you kill" -Now, this is not a good idea, and I'll tell you why. Pubs are a good way to get to know your corpmates better in a smaller group, meaning you get to know them more personally. And pubs is the best place to do that at. In pubs you can test their individual and teamwork skills and how they work with a small fireteam. On a final note, this game was designed with teamwork in mind, I might be okay with squads being removed in the game as long as they force every single player to voice in team chat. Ex-news reporter for The Scope

Adipem Nothi Nos Nothi 18	Posted - 2016.01.22 17:23:00 - [31] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Instead of removing squads from pubs altogether, why not start with one mode and see if it helps? This idea will never come to fruition because we don't have the dev resources, I don't think... but I'm just throwing it out there as food for thought. Imagine if we had a rotating incentive to perform certain gamemodes. One potential way that could work is through the daily mission system. Add 'Complete X ambushes' or 'Win X skirmishes' or if we want to take it a step further 'Earn X WPs in skirmishes'. There is no penalty to ignore these missions, but it might gently more people out of their comfort zones (domination). Yes! Dropsuit Usage Rates
Happy Violentime 1	Posted - 2016.01.22 17:49:00 - [32] - Quote Abraxis Mangelor wrote: removing squads from pubs would completely break ewar and hand the game to scouts even more than now. The only way a suit heavier than an assault can see anything smaller than himself is with shared ewar, or a nerfed defenses. This game is designed with teamwork at it's core by having complementary roles. Removing that core would stupify it even farther. Fairly sure you can work as a team without being in a premade squad? Think you'll find except for a couple of specific scanners that ewar is team shared anyway, further more use your eyes and stop relying on scanners, most good scouts are damped below what scanners can pick up anyway.
Soto Gallente 357	Posted - 2016.01.22 17:50:00 - [33] - Quote Not to mention that removing squads from pubs would make gal logis next to useless as they would get literally no WP for doing their job. Ex-news reporter for The Scope
Happy Violentime 1	Posted - 2016.01.22 17:52:00 - [34] - Quote Soto Gallente wrote: Not to mention that removing squads from pubs would make gal logis next to useless as they would get literally no WP for doing their job. Yeah, spinning deserves rewards.
Denchlad 7 Dead Man's Game 2	Posted - 2016.01.22 22:48:00 - [35] - Quote Yay Hughes still makes alts to post <3 You'll only find me playing Destiny now. PSN: TheMysteriousEnd (PS4/PS3) XBL: Mystend 7 (XB1/360)
Soto Gallente 377	Posted - 2016.01.22 23:06:00 - [36] - Quote Happy Violentime wrote: Soto Gallente wrote: Not to mention that removing squads from pubs would make gal logis next to useless as they would get literally no WP for doing their job. Yeah, spinning deserves rewards. In the same sense, why does pointing and holding the trigger button next to a target deserve a reward? Why does pressing R1 and releasing a nanohive and waiting for a teammate to randomly walk over deserve a reward? Why does putting uplinks down, going to the redline and sniping deserve a reward? The reason, even if it is easy to do, it still helps the team overall. Ex-news reporter for The Scope
golpe 4 Eternal Beings I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth 170	Posted - 2016.01.22 23:26:00 - [37] - Quote Satanic Fister wrote: I keep suggesting no squads in pubs but this community is so conceited that having one area without squads completely breaks the game and is unfair to casual players... that makes no **** in sense seeing as how it is now it not ducking fair for the casual solo players. I will never play again if u take squads away im just a scrub here, to u know, do things helpful like ummm commenting,complaining,and giving terrible advice thats it
maybe deadcatz Serris Inc 2	Posted - 2016.01.22 23:31:00 - [38] - Quote If I remember correctly, public contracts are available for lone mercenaries or small squads (fureteams durh). Can't handle the teamwork? Go hide in the corner. Ha!You can't kill me! I'm already dead!
postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 2	Posted - 2016.01.22 23:37:00 - [39] - Quote LHughes Little Boy wrote: NO TALKING ABOUT BEING ABLE TO PLAY THE GAME, WE KNOW THE SERVERS ARE ****** AT THE MOMENT!!! Now to business, just a list of what I think are easy to implement changes, feel free to add some more (easy to implement) ideas. - Shield variants of FG and swarms and armor variant of PLC. Very simple to add, would balance tanks out a lot more. - Already being said but a change to either the stamina usage of myofibs or change them to equipment (CCP said they were to reach new areas not for combat) - Heavy buff, I hate heavies but lets be honest they need maybe an extra 500HP (maybe lower speed after all they are for defense, You shouldn't be able to wiggle wiggle beat them 1v1) - Take equipment slot from Assaults and give scouts just 1 (I know most would disagree but it would be a decent buff for logis and increase overall teamwork) -Put a stacking penalty on PC districts to encourage more room for others to PC (However it's implemented I don't care, maybe 2/5% less clones reinforcements per district held) - Keep 10% of whatever suit and/or gun you kill in pubs (on top of WP payout), would encourage people to kill more proto rather than farm newbs (100 STD suits = 30k ISK, killing just 10 PRO suits = 57 ISK) Logi's, AV & tankers usually get more WPs which negates this. - No squads in pubs, Que the bitching! I'm sure there's somethings I've missed but what would you's want to see that CCP would have a hard time saying "SoonTM" or "we don't have the resources" If they can make the shtty AURUMbarge then they can do all of the above. Why no squads in pubs. I think it is better if we make limitation for gear than for cooperation. Better idea: pubs: mlt-adv + ofic. gear cut off fw: mlt-pro + ofic. gear cut off pc: all gear If you ask me i will cut the ofic. gear out completely (by my side of view it is just making more imbalances to all weaponary). "Im original Boii Boyko"*
maybe deadcatz Serris Inc 2	Posted - 2016.01.22 23:41:00 - [40] - Quote Postato(can't spell to save life),the fck are you saying? I have no idea what kind of gear limitations you want to impose? Ha!You can't kill me! I'm already dead!

postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 2	Posted - 2016.01.22 23:46:00 - [41] - Quote maybe deadcatz wrote: Postato(can't spell to save life),the fck are you saying? I have no idea what kind of gear limitations you want to impose? Still better Postato than Prostato XD I meant it is better to make some limitation to gear usage than to cooperation. OP wanted to make pubs without groups and i think that is quite nonsence. I see better way if we will make limitation to gear what we can use boyko ;) *"Im original Boii Boyko"*
LHughes Little Boy Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 30	Posted - 2016.01.23 19:03:00 - [42] - Quote maybe deadcatz wrote: If I remember correctly, public contracts are available for lone mercenaries or small squads (fureteams durh). Can't handle the teamwork? Go hide in the corner. 2/3 slayers in a squad ruins the game for the other 29/30 players. Its why I don't squad in pubs (unless there's another squad queuing bush then I'll make one) you're probably just one of the players that would consistently go negative unless your in a squad.... If you want to squad go play FW, or at the very least give us ambush to have no squads in. Gear has very little to do with stomping. Stomping pisses me off. Go look at the leader boards, look at Exctacy Cravings, Dia Farrons & the asians WL stats, they would leave squads or kick people to get better players in. No OP suit or weapon has ever had that much of an effect on winning a game.
Alena Asakura Caldari Logistics Reserve 319	Posted - 2016.01.23 20:27:00 - [43] - Quote LHughes Little Boy wrote: - Take equipment slot from Assaults and give scouts just 1 (I know most would disagree but it would be a decent buff for logis and increase overall teamwork) This is on the basis that what? Logis carry everything you need? What about the fact that some of us play solo and don't have a squad to have logis in? No you need an equipment slot and scouts need two for what they do. You carry a cloak for a start, that uses up one equipment slot. If you're carrying a scanner or a drop uplink you need to have another slot. Simple.
Ankbar Latrommi Roghnaigh Do Scrios 178	Posted - 2016.01.25 14:46:00 - [44] - Quote LHughes Little Boy wrote: Go look at the leader boards, This is Eve, I wouldn't trust the leader boards enough to make a point. Reiner Knizia-"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning." Eve> FPS
postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 2	Posted - 2016.01.25 15:44:00 - [45] - Quote LHughes Little Boy wrote: NO TALKING ABOUT BEING ABLE TO PLAY THE GAME, WE KNOW THE SERVERS ARE ****** AT THE MOMENT!!! Now to business, just a list of what I think are easy to implement changes, feel free to add some more (easy to implement) ideas. - Shield variants of FG and swarms and armor variant of PLC. Very simple to add, would balance tanks out a lot more. - Already being said but a change to either the stamina usage of myofibs or change them to equipment (CCP said they were to reach new areas not for combat) - Heavy buff, I hate heavies but lets be honest they need maybe an extra 500HP (maybe lower speed after all they are for defense, You shouldn't be able to wiggle wiggle beat them 1v1) - Take equipment slot from Assaults and give scouts just 1 (I know most would disagree but it would be a decent buff for logis and increase overall teamwork) -Put a stacking penalty on PC districts to encourage more room for others to PC (However it's implemented I don't care, maybe 2/5% less clones reinforcements per district held) - Keep 10% of whatever suit and/or gun you kill in pubs (on top of WP payout), would encourage people to kill more proto rather than farm newbs (100 STD suits = 30k ISK, killing just 10 PRO suits = 57 ISK) Logi's, AV & tankers usually get more WPs which negates this. - No squads in pubs, Que the bitching! I'm sure there's somethings I've missed but what would you's want to see that CCP would have a hard time saying "SoonTM" or "we don't have the resources" If they can make the shtty AURUMbarge then they can do all of the above. that first point is basicaly place for amarr heavy lance (heavy laser) and matari autocannon (heavy artilery). "Beware the wrath of chipmunk boyko"*
LHughes Little Boy Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 47	Posted - 2016.01.25 18:23:00 - [46] - Quote Ankbar Latrommi wrote: LHughes Little Boy wrote: Go look at the leader boards, This is Eve, I wouldn't trust the leader boards enough to make a point. If you know how the player plays of course you can.


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

PortDust514