Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Summa Militum
Art.of.Death
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 18:53:00 -
[1] - Quote
On my APEX 'Spartan' **** Your Tank class I have equipped a Plasma Cannon and Packed Lai Dai's. My strategy is simple, I run up to the tank like I am about to give it a hug but instead of a hug I shoot missiles and grenades at it.
Since FoxFour dropped I have not lost a single engagement with a tank. I know there are weak points on the tank but I am not exactly sure where they are at so it's not like I am consistently targeting those weak points.
Any other infantry out there find it extremely easy to destroy tanks now?
|
JIMvc2
KILL-EM-QUICK Rise Of Legion.
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 19:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
One time a stupid Minmatar Commando almost killed me when his stupid ass Mass Driver = That wanker failed lol.
In the end I ran him over >:)
I hope that teaches mercs that Tanks can still kill you even if you avoid them.
Judge my muscle content then I'll judge you by your Half Marathon time. Never underestimate runners - "Jim"
|
MrShooter01
Ustio Mercenary Squadron
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 19:28:00 -
[3] - Quote
When a tank really rustles my jimmies |
TERRORIST NO 1
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 19:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
fi'll tell you what they did, they fuked them up the ass then left them high and dry, tanking doesn't take skill anymore, it's either stacked dm's or dual hardners, ppl should bring out tanks to battle other tanks but thats not gnna happen if most tanks can get wreaked by starter av fits, what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to ***** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur **** straight ccp *BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT*... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare... |
Pocket Rocket Girl
Psygod9
511
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 19:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
TERRORIST NO 1 wrote: what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to ***** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur **** straight ccp *BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT*... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare...
Blame your fellow tankers that complained. They wanted balance because they didn't know how to pilot and this is the result.
Have garbage gun game? Throw a Core.
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
21
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 20:02:00 -
[6] - Quote
As many have said before none remain worth their salt or who care any more. HAV combat is a superfluous role that wastes a rifle on foot closer to the objective all the while not being particularly realistic, balanced, or interesting.
*Goes to Star Wars Battlefront Beta and operates AT-ST and AT-AT with powerful laser cannon with AoE damage, Air Strike Call Ins, Long Ranges, Etc*
Em shah tey et naGÇÖemsaer ek rahvi, amarr osedah gasi ubday pahk. Ekin tey vahka ijed div ema ziel. Et tey vamatal em.
|
JudgeIsABadPilot
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
51
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 20:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
Pocket Rocket Girl wrote:TERRORIST NO 1 wrote: what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to ***** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur **** straight ccp *BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT*... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare... Blame your fellow tankers that complained. They wanted balance because they didn't know how to pilot and this is the result. I think it's the opposite. They're so damn good and infantry so bad that they had vehicles beaten into the ground and nerfed to near-uselessness, because they couldn't solo marauders and the best pilots at the time. |
Summa Militum
Art.of.Death
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 20:14:00 -
[8] - Quote
JudgeIsABadPilot wrote:Pocket Rocket Girl wrote:TERRORIST NO 1 wrote: what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to ***** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur **** straight ccp *BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT*... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare... Blame your fellow tankers that complained. They wanted balance because they didn't know how to pilot and this is the result. I think it's the opposite. They're so damn good and infantry so bad that they had vehicles beaten into the ground and nerfed to near-uselessness, because they couldn't solo marauders and the best pilots at the time.
I agree with this.
I want to add that I believe a lot of infantry never bothered to figure out how to or even practiced flanking up on tanks to destroy them. Instead they would just run off to avoid them and then claim they are OP.
I feel bad for tankers now. Maybe I am just having a string of luck with destroying them at the moment; it's why I came to the forums about this.
I want to know if any other infantry who actively goes after tanks is finding it much easier to destroy them. |
MrShooter01
Ustio Mercenary Squadron
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 20:26:00 -
[9] - Quote
Summa Militum wrote: I feel bad for tankers now. Maybe I am just having a string of luck with destroying them at the moment; it's why I came to the forums about this.
I want to know if any other infantry who actively goes after tanks is finding it much easier to destroy them.
Honestly think its just luck on my part too, and new tankers coming into play
I've killed a couple maddies with PLCs which surprised me, but I never even hit their weak point, just caught them off guard and did too much damage before they lit up their hardeners, probably didn't know what to do about a nutjob attacking an armor tank with a plasma cannon and just assumed they could take more shots than they did. Haven't even encountered many gunnlogis, unless they were on my team.
A Gv.0 is still deadly as ever when one shows up with hardeners |
King Bolly
Dead TOOMEY
54
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 20:31:00 -
[10] - Quote
Summa Militum wrote:On my APEX 'Spartan' **** Your Tank class I have equipped a Plasma Cannon and Packed Lai Dai's. My strategy is simple, I run up to the tank like I am about to give it a hug but instead of a hug I shoot missiles and grenades at it.
Since FoxFour dropped I have not lost a single engagement with a tank. I know there are weak points on the tank but I am not exactly sure where they are at so it's not like I am consistently targeting those weak points.
Any other infantry out there find it extremely easy to destroy tanks now?
i have max tank skills 2 complex reps, complex 120mm, and a hardener, it would take 2 of you
Flight ceiling has its limit.
|
|
King Bolly
Dead TOOMEY
54
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 20:32:00 -
[11] - Quote
King Bolly wrote:Summa Militum wrote:On my APEX 'Spartan' **** Your Tank class I have equipped a Plasma Cannon and Packed Lai Dai's. My strategy is simple, I run up to the tank like I am about to give it a hug but instead of a hug I shoot missiles and grenades at it.
Since FoxFour dropped I have not lost a single engagement with a tank. I know there are weak points on the tank but I am not exactly sure where they are at so it's not like I am consistently targeting those weak points.
Any other infantry out there find it extremely easy to destroy tanks now?
i have max tank skills 2 complex reps, complex 120mm, and a hardener, it would take 2 of you also have you met duna2002?
Flight ceiling has its limit.
|
Summa Militum
Art.of.Death
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 20:48:00 -
[12] - Quote
King Bolly wrote:Summa Militum wrote:On my APEX 'Spartan' **** Your Tank class I have equipped a Plasma Cannon and Packed Lai Dai's. My strategy is simple, I run up to the tank like I am about to give it a hug but instead of a hug I shoot missiles and grenades at it.
Since FoxFour dropped I have not lost a single engagement with a tank. I know there are weak points on the tank but I am not exactly sure where they are at so it's not like I am consistently targeting those weak points.
Any other infantry out there find it extremely easy to destroy tanks now?
i have max tank skills 2 complex reps, complex 120mm, and a hardener, it would take 2 of you
Good! If you have all your tank skills maxed out and are equipping Proto Gear it sure as hell should take atleast two people to take you out.
Heads up though, usually when I see a tank with a hardener running I will simply wait a little bit for the hardener to run out before attacking. |
Summa Militum
Art.of.Death
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 20:50:00 -
[13] - Quote
King Bolly wrote:King Bolly wrote:Summa Militum wrote:On my APEX 'Spartan' **** Your Tank class I have equipped a Plasma Cannon and Packed Lai Dai's. My strategy is simple, I run up to the tank like I am about to give it a hug but instead of a hug I shoot missiles and grenades at it.
Since FoxFour dropped I have not lost a single engagement with a tank. I know there are weak points on the tank but I am not exactly sure where they are at so it's not like I am consistently targeting those weak points.
Any other infantry out there find it extremely easy to destroy tanks now?
i have max tank skills 2 complex reps, complex 120mm, and a hardener, it would take 2 of you also have you met duna2002?
Yea, I have killed Duna2002 before in his fancy tank. With Duna once you destroy one of his tanks you will never see him the rest of the match. |
JudgeIsABadPilot
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
51
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 21:01:00 -
[14] - Quote
King Bolly wrote:King Bolly wrote:Summa Militum wrote:On my APEX 'Spartan' **** Your Tank class I have equipped a Plasma Cannon and Packed Lai Dai's. My strategy is simple, I run up to the tank like I am about to give it a hug but instead of a hug I shoot missiles and grenades at it.
Since FoxFour dropped I have not lost a single engagement with a tank. I know there are weak points on the tank but I am not exactly sure where they are at so it's not like I am consistently targeting those weak points.
Any other infantry out there find it extremely easy to destroy tanks now?
i have max tank skills 2 complex reps, complex 120mm, and a hardener, it would take 2 of you also have you met duna2002? Duna is trash. |
MrShooter01
Ustio Mercenary Squadron
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 21:08:00 -
[15] - Quote
Summa Militum wrote: Yea, I have killed Duna2002 before in his fancy tank. With Duna once you destroy one of his tanks you will never see him the rest of the match.
He will also send you a squad invite and get very angry if you decline |
IMMORTAL WAR HERO
NECROM0NGERS
420
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 21:22:00 -
[16] - Quote
Pocket Rocket Girl wrote:TERRORIST NO 1 wrote: what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to ***** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur **** straight ccp *BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT*... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare... Blame your fellow tankers that complained. They wanted balance because they didn't know how to pilot and this is the result.
Trrruuuuuuuuuuuuueeeeeeee yo fuk all you tank scrubs
Frowned upon by amateurs: The object of war is not to die for your country but make the other bastard die for his. GSP
|
Roger Cordill
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
447
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 21:39:00 -
[17] - Quote
Pocket Rocket Girl wrote:TERRORIST NO 1 wrote: what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to ***** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur **** straight ccp *BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT*... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare... Blame your fellow tankers that complained. They wanted balance because they didn't know how to pilot and this is the result.
I've never seen a single Pilot actually ask for those changes, at the most accepting of them until they saw that they were ineffective, really harmful. |
Roger Cordill
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
447
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 21:44:00 -
[18] - Quote
The problem is that balance has been focused on balance. But balance on what grounds? Vehicles are the most poorly defined things in the game, hence the "vehicles have no role" often being said. |
KEROSIINI-TERO
The Rainbow Effect
2
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 22:31:00 -
[19] - Quote
Those weak spots are really significant.
Here's a clip from the first day of HF FoxFour: https://youtu.be/5UOioTIkC0Y
Note: that was a solo good player, with JUST AHMG and he did NOT use AV nades. All in five seconds, thru double large reps without time for hardeners to kick in.
Cool kill, gotta say. Tankers gotta adapt.
"Today I have been feeling mostly smug."
KERO-TRADER is my official Eve character for Dust trading.
|
Pocket Rocket Girl
Psygod9
514
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 22:50:00 -
[20] - Quote
Summa Militum wrote:JudgeIsABadPilot wrote:Pocket Rocket Girl wrote:TERRORIST NO 1 wrote: what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to ***** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur **** straight ccp *BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT*... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare... Blame your fellow tankers that complained. They wanted balance because they didn't know how to pilot and this is the result. I think it's the opposite. They're so damn good and infantry so bad that they had vehicles beaten into the ground and nerfed to near-uselessness, because they couldn't solo marauders and the best pilots at the time. I agree with this. I want to add that I believe a lot of infantry never bothered to figure out how to or even practiced flanking up on tanks to destroy them. Instead they would just run off to avoid them and then claim they are OP. I feel bad for tankers now. Maybe I am just having a string of luck with destroying them at the moment; it's why I came to the forums about this. I want to know if any other infantry who actively goes after tanks is finding it much easier to destroy them.
I disagree with that most of the forum posts were tankers complaint that av is op after 1.7. But yes there were alot of av players that didn't know how to tackle a tank during 1.7. I admit I wasnt the best nor am I now but all I did was adapt and try to improve my game play style. I'd try to find some one else with av and stick with them. Tankers complained that it should take teamwork to take a tank out and before the current hot fix ( which is a joke in my opinion) I would tank every now and again and it would take at least 2 people to kill me every time. Have I been soloed yes but I knew I ran that risk with my modules on cool down. But yes I do agree something is off with tanks they are easier to pop but there was also the increase to the weak spot.
Have garbage gun game? Throw a Core.
|
|
TERRORIST NO 1
RAISE 'EM UP
17
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 23:46:00 -
[21] - Quote
IMMORTAL WAR HERO wrote:Pocket Rocket Girl wrote:TERRORIST NO 1 wrote: what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to ***** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur **** straight ccp *BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT*... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare... Blame your fellow tankers that complained. They wanted balance because they didn't know how to pilot and this is the result. Trrruuuuueee yo fuk all you tank scrubs lmfao, you were probably 1 of the ppl bitching about balance, canadian scrub! :)
I would rather die for a cause than live a life that is worthless.
-Immortal Technique
|
Pocket Rocket Girl
Psygod9
514
|
Posted - 2015.10.12 00:00:00 -
[22] - Quote
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote:Those weak spots are really significant. Here's a clip from the first day of HF FoxFour: https://youtu.be/5UOioTIkC0YNote: that was a solo good player, with JUST AHMG and he did NOT use AV nades. All in five seconds, thru double large reps without time for hardeners to kick in. Cool kill, gotta say. Tankers gotta adapt.
It looked like there were 2 people hitting you one could have possible overheated and the other took over. But either way it was a clean kill harnders were down the took advantage of you being distracted. I'm glad your not one of those tankers that's scream and yell when they died.
Have garbage gun game? Throw a Core.
|
Mobius Wyvern
Fatal Absolution Bleeding Sun Conglomerate
7
|
Posted - 2015.10.12 00:40:00 -
[23] - Quote
The people whining about the Hotfix need to stop trying to sweep the big issue under the rug.
Armor Repairer Madrugar/Marduk fits had been nearly indestructible for months. With the adjustments to HAVs they buffed shields and left armor alone such that it is now possible to take out rep-stacking Gallente tanks.
By no means have they been rendered useless by being vulnerable to weapons designed to damage them.
Amidst the blue skies
A link from past to future
The sheltering wings of the protector
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
21
|
Posted - 2015.10.12 00:51:00 -
[24] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:The people whining about the Hotfix need to stop trying to sweep the big issue under the rug.
Armor Repairer Madrugar/Marduk fits had been nearly indestructible for months. With the adjustments to HAVs they buffed shields and left armor alone such that it is now possible to take out rep-stacking Gallente tanks.
By no means have they been rendered useless by being vulnerable to weapons designed to damage them.
That's not really what I take issue with as I agree Repairers never should have gone passive.... it's that HAV don't act like heavily armed and armoured vehicles should.
Em shah tey et naGÇÖemsaer ek rahvi, amarr osedah gasi ubday pahk. Ekin tey vahka ijed div ema ziel. Et tey vamatal em.
|
Operative 1174 Uuali
True Companion Planetary Requisitions
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.12 03:10:00 -
[25] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:As many have said before none remain worth their salt or who care any more. HAV combat is a superfluous role that wastes a rifle on foot closer to the objective all the while not being particularly realistic, balanced, or interesting.
*Goes to Star Wars Battlefront Beta and operates AT-ST and AT-AT with powerful laser cannon with AoE damage, Air Strike Call Ins, Long Ranges, Etc*
I have much sad. Is Star Wars good? Is it worth it?
I'm an original Star Wars baby. I live it. That's the first movie my 5 year old self actually remembered when I walked out of the theater. For the first time I see an SW game that, to me, could live up to the video game experience I always wanted.
Can't wait to take my boys to their first SW film at the theater and it looks to be what I like to call GÇÿStar Wars: Not the Prequels'.
CCP logic GÇô We fix what doesn't need breaking.
|
Operative 1174 Uuali
True Companion Planetary Requisitions
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.12 03:15:00 -
[26] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:The people whining about the Hotfix need to stop trying to sweep the big issue under the rug.
Armor Repairer Madrugar/Marduk fits had been nearly indestructible for months. With the adjustments to HAVs they buffed shields and left armor alone such that it is now possible to take out rep-stacking Gallente tanks.
By no means have they been rendered useless by being vulnerable to weapons designed to damage them. That's not really what I take issue with as I agree Repairers never should have gone passive.... it's that HAV don't act like heavily armed and armoured vehicles should.
A tank is a "trench buster". Anything not resembling that is a fail. The few times I have used a tank like that it is fulfilling. For instance, being able to roll into CQ (with a missile Gunni no less!) and pulling area denial and force the enemy into paths of approach is one of the few times a tank is doing what it should and achieving a useful role in DUST.
CCP logic GÇô We fix what doesn't need breaking.
|
Summa Militum
Art.of.Death
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.12 03:27:00 -
[27] - Quote
Operative 1174 Uuali wrote:True Adamance wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:The people whining about the Hotfix need to stop trying to sweep the big issue under the rug.
Armor Repairer Madrugar/Marduk fits had been nearly indestructible for months. With the adjustments to HAVs they buffed shields and left armor alone such that it is now possible to take out rep-stacking Gallente tanks.
By no means have they been rendered useless by being vulnerable to weapons designed to damage them. That's not really what I take issue with as I agree Repairers never should have gone passive.... it's that HAV don't act like heavily armed and armoured vehicles should. A tank is a "trench buster". Anything not resembling that is a fail. The few times I have used a tank like that it is fulfilling. For instance, being able to roll into CQ (with a missile Gunni no less!) and pulling area denial and force the enemy into paths of approach is one of the few times a tank is doing what it should and achieving a useful role in DUST.
I wish I saw more often in this game what you just described. I'm not a tanker so I'd probably be one of the people getting slaughtered by the tank but at least it would be epic. |
postapo wastelander
Corrosive Synergy
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.12 03:30:00 -
[28] - Quote
Summa Militum wrote:On my APEX 'Spartan' **** Your Tank class I have equipped a Plasma Cannon and Packed Lai Dai's. My strategy is simple, I run up to the tank like I am about to give it a hug but instead of a hug I shoot missiles and grenades at it.
Since FoxFour dropped I have not lost a single engagement with a tank. I know there are weak points on the tank but I am not exactly sure where they are at so it's not like I am consistently targeting those weak points.
Any other infantry out there find it extremely easy to destroy tanks now?
I will take my quafe forge and try to forge some ragdolls XD
"Forge Sentinel - Corrosive Synergy"
|
Tread Loudly 2
FromTheAshes Damage LLC
133
|
Posted - 2015.10.12 03:32:00 -
[29] - Quote
The problem with tanks is that there are far more infantry than vehicle operators here on the forums so generally if both the infantry and the vehicle operators are complaining about opposite things the infantry will win :(
EDIT: Tank operator for over 2 years
Also as far as no tankers worth their salt anymore that's just BS, they old OP tankers are no longer here that's why Duna2002 is trying to make a comeback with his 4 man tank squads.
AV is OP and I stand by that as an AV person because it is SO easy for me to 1v1 a tank with any type of AV. And I'm not spectacularly talented with AV either.
Let my sniper see far, and my Bolt Pistol kill many.
|
postapo wastelander
Corrosive Synergy
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.12 03:39:00 -
[30] - Quote
Tread Loudly 2 wrote:The problem with tanks is that there are far more infantry than vehicle operators here on the forums so generally if both the infantry and the vehicle operators are complaining about opposite things the infantry will win :(
EDIT: Tank operator for over 2 years
Also as far as no tankers worth their salt anymore that's just BS, they old OP tankers are no longer here that's why Duna2002 is trying to make a comeback with his 4 man tank squads.
AV is OP and I stand by that as an AV person because it is SO easy for me to 1v1 a tank with any type of AV. And I'm not spectacularly talented with AV either.
Major issue is there is not enought designated AVers on fields and that time infantry starts about "OP vehicles". In that same time drivers start with "OP AV weaponary" and constructivism is gone.
I think Its good now. I can take down tank or DS i do not have issue.
I have issue when there is three tanks on battlefield and im only boyo with forge around. That is issue.
"Forge Sentinel - Corrosive Synergy"
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |