DUST Search - What Did You Do To The Tankers?

All Channels

General Discussions

What Did You Do To The Tankers?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Summa Militum Art.of.Death 1	Posted - 2015.10.11 18:53:00 - [1] - Quote On my APEX 'Spartan' *** Your Tank* class I have equipped a Plasma Cannon and Packed Lai Dai's. My strategy is simple, I run up to the tank like I am about to give it a hug but instead of a hug I shoot missiles and grenades at it. Since FoxFour dropped I have not lost a single engagement with a tank. I know there are weak points on the tank but I am not exactly sure where they are at so it's not like I am consistently targeting those weak points. Any other infantry out there find it extremely easy to destroy tanks now?
JIMvc2 KILL-EM-QUICK Rise Of Legion. 1	Posted - 2015.10.11 19:00:00 - [2] - Quote One time a stupid Minmatar Commando almost killed me when his stupid ass Mass Driver = That wanker failed lol. In the end I ran him over >:) I hope that teaches mercs that Tanks can still kill you even if you avoid them. Judge my muscle content then I'll judge you by your Half Marathon time. Never underestimate runners - "Jim"
MrShooter01 Ustio Mercenary Squadron 1	Posted - 2015.10.11 19:28:00 - [3] - Quote When a tank really rustles my jimmies
TERRORIST NO 1 Ametat Security Amarr Empire 9	Posted - 2015.10.11 19:41:00 - [4] - Quote fi'll tell you what they did, they fuked them up the ass then left them high and dry, tanking doesn't take skill anymore, it's either stacked dm's or dual hardners, ppl should bring out tanks to battle other tanks but thats not gnna happen if most tanks can get wreaked by starter av fits, what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to *** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur ** straight ccp BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare...
Pocket Rocket Girl Psygod9 511	Posted - 2015.10.11 19:47:00 - [5] - Quote TERRORIST NO 1 wrote: what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to *** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur ** straight ccp BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare... Blame your fellow tankers that complained. They wanted balance because they didn't know how to pilot and this is the result. Have garbage gun game? Throw a Core.
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 21	Posted - 2015.10.11 20:02:00 - [6] - Quote As many have said before none remain worth their salt or who care any more. HAV combat is a superfluous role that wastes a rifle on foot closer to the objective all the while not being particularly realistic, balanced, or interesting. Goes to Star Wars Battlefront Beta and operates AT-ST and AT-AT with powerful laser cannon with AoE damage, Air Strike Call Ins, Long Ranges, Etc Em shah tey et naGÇÖemsaer ek rahvi, amarr osedah gasi ubday pahk. Ekin tey vahka ijed div ema ziel. Et tey vamatal em.
JudgeIsABadPilot Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic 51	Posted - 2015.10.11 20:02:00 - [7] - Quote Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: TERRORIST NO 1 wrote: what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to *** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur ** straight ccp BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare... Blame your fellow tankers that complained. They wanted balance because they didn't know how to pilot and this is the result. I think it's the opposite. They're so damn good and infantry so bad that they had vehicles beaten into the ground and nerfed to near-uselessness, because they couldn't solo marauders and the best pilots at the time.
Summa Militum Art.of.Death 1	Posted - 2015.10.11 20:14:00 - [8] - Quote JudgeIsABadPilot wrote: Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: TERRORIST NO 1 wrote: what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to *** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur ** straight ccp BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare... Blame your fellow tankers that complained. They wanted balance because they didn't know how to pilot and this is the result. I think it's the opposite. They're so damn good and infantry so bad that they had vehicles beaten into the ground and nerfed to near-uselessness, because they couldn't solo marauders and the best pilots at the time. I agree with this. I want to add that I believe a lot of infantry never bothered to figure out how to or even practiced flanking up on tanks to destroy them. Instead they would just run off to avoid them and then claim they are OP. I feel bad for tankers now. Maybe I am just having a string of luck with destroying them at the moment; it's why I came to the forums about this. I want to know if any other infantry who actively goes after tanks is finding it much easier to destroy them.
MrShooter01 Ustio Mercenary Squadron 1	Posted - 2015.10.11 20:26:00 - [9] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: I feel bad for tankers now. Maybe I am just having a string of luck with destroying them at the moment; it's why I came to the forums about this. I want to know if any other infantry who actively goes after tanks is finding it much easier to destroy them. Honestly think its just luck on my part too, and new tankers coming into play I've killed a couple maddies with PLCs which surprised me, but I never even hit their weak point, just caught them off guard and did too much damage before they lit up their hardeners, probably didn't know what to do about a nutjob attacking an armor tank with a plasma cannon and just assumed they could take more shots than they did. Haven't even encountered many gunnlogis, unless they were on my team. A Gv.0 is still deadly as ever when one shows up with hardeners
King Bolly Dead TOOMEY 54	Posted - 2015.10.11 20:31:00 - [10] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: On my APEX 'Spartan' *** Your Tank* class I have equipped a Plasma Cannon and Packed Lai Dai's. My strategy is simple, I run up to the tank like I am about to give it a hug but instead of a hug I shoot missiles and grenades at it. Since FoxFour dropped I have not lost a single engagement with a tank. I know there are weak points on the tank but I am not exactly sure where they are at so it's not like I am consistently targeting those weak points. Any other infantry out there find it extremely easy to destroy tanks now? i have max tank skills 2 complex reps, complex 120mm, and a hardener, it would take 2 of you Flight ceiling has its limit.

King Bolly Dead TOOMEY 54	Posted - 2015.10.11 20:32:00 - [11] - Quote King Bolly wrote: Summa Militum wrote: On my APEX 'Spartan' *** Your Tank* class I have equipped a Plasma Cannon and Packed Lai Dai's. My strategy is simple, I run up to the tank like I am about to give it a hug but instead of a hug I shoot missiles and grenades at it. Since FoxFour dropped I have not lost a single engagement with a tank. I know there are weak points on the tank but I am not exactly sure where they are at so it's not like I am consistently targeting those weak points. Any other infantry out there find it extremely easy to destroy tanks now? i have max tank skills 2 complex reps, complex 120mm, and a hardener, it would take 2 of you also have you met duna2002? Flight ceiling has its limit.
Summa Militum Art.of.Death 1	Posted - 2015.10.11 20:48:00 - [12] - Quote King Bolly wrote: Summa Militum wrote: On my APEX 'Spartan' *** Your Tank* class I have equipped a Plasma Cannon and Packed Lai Dai's. My strategy is simple, I run up to the tank like I am about to give it a hug but instead of a hug I shoot missiles and grenades at it. Since FoxFour dropped I have not lost a single engagement with a tank. I know there are weak points on the tank but I am not exactly sure where they are at so it's not like I am consistently targeting those weak points. Any other infantry out there find it extremely easy to destroy tanks now? i have max tank skills 2 complex reps, complex 120mm, and a hardener, it would take 2 of you Good! If you have all your tank skills maxed out and are equipping Proto Gear it sure as hell should take atleast two people to take you out. Heads up though, usually when I see a tank with a hardener running I will simply wait a little bit for the hardener to run out before attacking.
Summa Militum Art.of.Death 1	Posted - 2015.10.11 20:50:00 - [13] - Quote King Bolly wrote: King Bolly wrote: Summa Militum wrote: On my APEX 'Spartan' *** Your Tank* class I have equipped a Plasma Cannon and Packed Lai Dai's. My strategy is simple, I run up to the tank like I am about to give it a hug but instead of a hug I shoot missiles and grenades at it. Since FoxFour dropped I have not lost a single engagement with a tank. I know there are weak points on the tank but I am not exactly sure where they are at so it's not like I am consistently targeting those weak points. Any other infantry out there find it extremely easy to destroy tanks now? i have max tank skills 2 complex reps, complex 120mm, and a hardener, it would take 2 of you also have you met duna2002? Yea, I have killed Duna2002 before in his fancy tank. With Duna once you destroy one of his tanks you will never see him the rest of the match.
JudgeIsABadPilot Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic 51	Posted - 2015.10.11 21:01:00 - [14] - Quote King Bolly wrote: King Bolly wrote: Summa Militum wrote: On my APEX 'Spartan' *** Your Tank* class I have equipped a Plasma Cannon and Packed Lai Dai's. My strategy is simple, I run up to the tank like I am about to give it a hug but instead of a hug I shoot missiles and grenades at it. Since FoxFour dropped I have not lost a single engagement with a tank. I know there are weak points on the tank but I am not exactly sure where they are at so it's not like I am consistently targeting those weak points. Any other infantry out there find it extremely easy to destroy tanks now? i have max tank skills 2 complex reps, complex 120mm, and a hardener, it would take 2 of you also have you met duna2002? Duna is trash.
MrShooter01 Ustio Mercenary Squadron 1	Posted - 2015.10.11 21:08:00 - [15] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: Yea, I have killed Duna2002 before in his fancy tank. With Duna once you destroy one of his tanks you will never see him the rest of the match. He will also send you a squad invite and get very angry if you decline
IMMORTAL WAR HERO NECROM0NGERS 420	Posted - 2015.10.11 21:22:00 - [16] - Quote Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: TERRORIST NO 1 wrote: what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to *** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur ** straight ccp BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare... Blame your fellow tankers that complained. They wanted balance because they didn't know how to pilot and this is the result. Trrruuuuuuuuuuuuueeeeeeee yo fuk all you tank scrubs Frowned upon by amateurs: The object of war is not to die for your country but make the other bastard die for his. GSP
Roger Cordill The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 447	Posted - 2015.10.11 21:39:00 - [17] - Quote Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: TERRORIST NO 1 wrote: what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to *** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur ** straight ccp BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare... Blame your fellow tankers that complained. They wanted balance because they didn't know how to pilot and this is the result. I've never seen a single Pilot actually ask for those changes, at the most accepting of them until they saw that they were ineffective, really harmful.
Roger Cordill The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 447	Posted - 2015.10.11 21:44:00 - [18] - Quote The problem is that balance has been focused on balance. But balance on what grounds? Vehicles are the most poorly defined things in the game, hence the "vehicles have no role" often being said.
KEROSIINI-TERO The Rainbow Effect 2	Posted - 2015.10.11 22:31:00 - [19] - Quote Those weak spots are really significant. Here's a clip from the first day of HF FoxFour: https://youtu.be/5UOioTIkC0Y Note: that was a solo good player, with JUST AHMG and he did NOT use AV nades. All in five seconds, thru double large reps without time for hardeners to kick in. Cool kill, gotta say. Tankers gotta adapt. "Today I have been feeling mostly smug." KERO-TRADER is my official Eve character for Dust trading.
Pocket Rocket Girl Psygod9 514	Posted - 2015.10.11 22:50:00 - [20] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: JudgeIsABadPilot wrote: Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: TERRORIST NO 1 wrote: what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to *** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur ** straight ccp BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare... Blame your fellow tankers that complained. They wanted balance because they didn't know how to pilot and this is the result. I think it's the opposite. They're so damn good and infantry so bad that they had vehicles beaten into the ground and nerfed to near-uselessness, because they couldn't solo marauders and the best pilots at the time. I agree with this. I want to add that I believe a lot of infantry never bothered to figure out how to or even practiced flanking up on tanks to destroy them. Instead they would just run off to avoid them and then claim they are OP. I feel bad for tankers now. Maybe I am just having a string of luck with destroying them at the moment; it's why I came to the forums about this. I want to know if any other infantry who actively goes after tanks is finding it much easier to destroy them. I disagree with that most of the forum posts were tankers complaint that av is op after 1.7. But yes there were alot of av players that didn't know how to tackle a tank during 1.7. I admit I wasnt the best nor am I now but all I did was adapt and try to improve my game play style. I'd try to find some one else with av and stick with them. Tankers complained that it should take teamwork to take a tank out and before the current hot fix ( which is a joke in my opinion) I would tank every now and again and it would take at least 2 people to kill me every time. Have I been soloed yes but I knew I ran that risk with my modules on cool down. But yes I do agree something is off with tanks they are easier to pop but there was also the increase to the weak spot. Have garbage gun game? Throw a Core.

TERRORIST NO 1 RAISE 'EM UP 17	Posted - 2015.10.11 23:46:00 - [21] - Quote IMMORTAL WAR HERO wrote: Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: TERRORIST NO 1 wrote: what happened to the old days where it was 3v4 or 1v1 or 2v5 etc tank battles, no1 used to *** about tanks then until 1.7 when ccp started taking crack n i was racing lav's in my tank :), thy went crazy with tanks n idk why... then came 1.8 where any tank would die in 3 swarms, now u hve every1 telling u how bad tanks are except the dumbasses crying about dual hardners n every1, evev av runners telling u how op av is. take the dik out ur asses n get ur ** straight ccp BPO TANKS ARE STILL OWNED BUY THE PPL WHO BOUGHT THEM, U HVE NO RIGHT TO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE IT... u should put oooooopppppppppp aaaasssss fuk officer vehicle's in btw n make em really rare... Blame your fellow tankers that complained. They wanted balance because they didn't know how to pilot and this is the result. Trrruuuuueee yo fuk all you tank scrubs lmfao, you were probably 1 of the ppl bitching about balance, canadian scrub! :) I would rather die for a cause than live a life that is worthless. -Immortal Technique
Pocket Rocket Girl Psygod9 514	Posted - 2015.10.12 00:00:00 - [22] - Quote KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: Those weak spots are really significant. Here's a clip from the first day of HF FoxFour: https://youtu.be/5UOioTIkC0Y Note: that was a solo good player, with JUST AHMG and he did NOT use AV nades. All in five seconds, thru double large reps without time for hardeners to kick in. Cool kill, gotta say. Tankers gotta adapt. It looked like there were 2 people hitting you one could have possible overheated and the other took over. But either way it was a clean kill harnders were down the took advantage of you being distracted. I'm glad your not one of those tankers that's scream and yell when they died. Have garbage gun game? Throw a Core.
Mobius Wyvern Fatal Absolution Bleeding Sun Conglomerate 7	Posted - 2015.10.12 00:40:00 - [23] - Quote The people whining about the Hotfix need to stop trying to sweep the big issue under the rug. Armor Repairer Madrugar/Marduk fits had been nearly indestructible for months. With the adjustments to HAVs they buffed shields and left armor alone such that it is now possible to take out rep-stacking Gallente tanks. By no means have they been rendered useless by being vulnerable to weapons designed to damage them. Amidst the blue skies A link from past to future The sheltering wings of the protector
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 21	Posted - 2015.10.12 00:51:00 - [24] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: The people whining about the Hotfix need to stop trying to sweep the big issue under the rug. Armor Repairer Madrugar/Marduk fits had been nearly indestructible for months. With the adjustments to HAVs they buffed shields and left armor alone such that it is now possible to take out rep-stacking Gallente tanks. By no means have they been rendered useless by being vulnerable to weapons designed to damage them. That's not really what I take issue with as I agree Repairers never should have gone passive.... it's that HAV don't act like heavily armed and armoured vehicles should. Em shah tey et naGÇÖemsaer ek rahvi, amarr osedah gasi ubday pahk. Ekin tey vahka ijed div ema ziel. Et tey vamatal em.
Operative 1174 Uuali True Companion Planetary Requisitions 1	Posted - 2015.10.12 03:10:00 - [25] - Quote True Adamance wrote: As many have said before none remain worth their salt or who care any more. HAV combat is a superfluous role that wastes a rifle on foot closer to the objective all the while not being particularly realistic, balanced, or interesting. Goes to Star Wars Battlefront Beta and operates AT-ST and AT-AT with powerful laser cannon with AoE damage, Air Strike Call Ins, Long Ranges, Etc I have much sad. Is Star Wars good? Is it worth it? I'm an original Star Wars baby. I live it. That's the first movie my 5 year old self actually remembered when I walked out of the theater. For the first time I see an SW game that, to me, could live up to the video game experience I always wanted. Can't wait to take my boys to their first SW film at the theater and it looks to be what I like to call GÇÿStar Wars: Not the Prequels'. CCP logic GÇô We fix what doesn't need breaking.
Operative 1174 Uuali True Companion Planetary Requisitions 1	Posted - 2015.10.12 03:15:00 - [26] - Quote True Adamance wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: The people whining about the Hotfix need to stop trying to sweep the big issue under the rug. Armor Repairer Madrugar/Marduk fits had been nearly indestructible for months. With the adjustments to HAVs they buffed shields and left armor alone such that it is now possible to take out rep-stacking Gallente tanks. By no means have they been rendered useless by being vulnerable to weapons designed to damage them. That's not really what I take issue with as I agree Repairers never should have gone passive.... it's that HAV don't act like heavily armed and armoured vehicles should. A tank is a "trench buster". Anything not resembling that is a fail. The few times I have used a tank like that it is fulfilling. For instance, being able to roll into CQ (with a missile Gunni no less!) and pulling area denial and force the enemy into paths of approach is one of the few times a tank is doing what it should and achieving a useful role in DUST. CCP logic GÇô We fix what doesn't need breaking.
Summa Militum Art.of.Death 1	Posted - 2015.10.12 03:27:00 - [27] - Quote Operative 1174 Uuali wrote: True Adamance wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: The people whining about the Hotfix need to stop trying to sweep the big issue under the rug. Armor Repairer Madrugar/Marduk fits had been nearly indestructible for months. With the adjustments to HAVs they buffed shields and left armor alone such that it is now possible to take out rep-stacking Gallente tanks. By no means have they been rendered useless by being vulnerable to weapons designed to damage them. That's not really what I take issue with as I agree Repairers never should have gone passive.... it's that HAV don't act like heavily armed and armoured vehicles should. A tank is a "trench buster". Anything not resembling that is a fail. The few times I have used a tank like that it is fulfilling. For instance, being able to roll into CQ (with a missile Gunni no less!) and pulling area denial and force the enemy into paths of approach is one of the few times a tank is doing what it should and achieving a useful role in DUST. I wish I saw more often in this game what you just described. I'm not a tanker so I'd probably be one of the people getting slaughtered by the tank but at least it would be epic.
postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 1	Posted - 2015.10.12 03:30:00 - [28] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: On my APEX 'Spartan' *** Your Tank* class I have equipped a Plasma Cannon and Packed Lai Dai's. My strategy is simple, I run up to the tank like I am about to give it a hug but instead of a hug I shoot missiles and grenades at it. Since FoxFour dropped I have not lost a single engagement with a tank. I know there are weak points on the tank but I am not exactly sure where they are at so it's not like I am consistently targeting those weak points. Any other infantry out there find it extremely easy to destroy tanks now? I will take my quafe forge and try to forge some ragdolls XD "Forge Sentinel - Corrosive Synergy"
Tread Loudly 2 FromTheAshes Damage LLC 133	Posted - 2015.10.12 03:32:00 - [29] - Quote The problem with tanks is that there are far more infantry than vehicle operators here on the forums so generally if both the infantry and the vehicle operators are complaining about opposite things the infantry will win :( EDIT: Tank operator for over 2 years Also as far as no tankers worth their salt anymore that's just BS, they old OP tankers are no longer here that's why Duna2002 is trying to make a comeback with his 4 man tank squads. AV is OP and I stand by that as an AV person because it is SO easy for me to 1v1 a tank with any type of AV. And I'm not spectacularly talented with AV either. Let my sniper see far, and my Bolt Pistol kill many.
postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 1	Posted - 2015.10.12 03:39:00 - [30] - Quote Tread Loudly 2 wrote: The problem with tanks is that there are far more infantry than vehicle operators here on the forums so generally if both the infantry and the vehicle operators are complaining about opposite things the infantry will win :( EDIT: Tank operator for over 2 years Also as far as no tankers worth their salt anymore that's just BS, they old OP tankers are no longer here that's why Duna2002 is trying to make a comeback with his 4 man tank squads. AV is OP and I stand by that as an AV person because it is SO easy for me to 1v1 a tank with any type of AV. And I'm not spectacularly talented with AV either. Major issue is there is not enought designated AVers on fields and that time infantry starts about "OP vehicles". In that same time drivers start with "OP AV weaponary" and constructivism is gone. I think Its good now. I can take down tank or DS i do not have issue. I have issue when there is three tanks on battlefield and im only boyo with forge around. That is issue. "Forge Sentinel - Corrosive Synergy"

Skihids Random Gunz Rise Of Legion. 3	Posted - 2015.10.12 04:29:00 - [31] - Quote As long as vehicles compete with infantry for the role of slaying infantry they will be balanced 1v1 with infantry. That's not my definition of a tank, but DUST doesn't have a role for a modern tank. There is nothing for it to do other than hunt individual infantry units. Can you imagine tanks being used that way on today's battlefield? In DUST an HAV is just another suit for a player to wear that does the same thing other suits do. Thus it can't be any better than any other suit. If tanks had a unique niche destroying something that infantry wasn't good at and were wasted going after infantry, then they could be harder for infantry to kill in return. Piloting vehicles sucks, and it will remain so unless and until CCP gives vehicles a unique role.
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 11	Posted - 2015.10.12 05:32:00 - [32] - Quote MrShooter01 wrote: Summa Militum wrote: Yea, I have killed Duna2002 before in his fancy tank. With Duna once you destroy one of his tanks you will never see him the rest of the match. He will also send you a squad invite and get very angry if you decline Funny he never invited me on the occasions I torched his murder chariots. WoW has taught me that Purple means Legendary. This means Quafe suits are the optimal loadout for killing all of you.
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 11	Posted - 2015.10.12 05:33:00 - [33] - Quote True Adamance wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: The people whining about the Hotfix need to stop trying to sweep the big issue under the rug. Armor Repairer Madrugar/Marduk fits had been nearly indestructible for months. With the adjustments to HAVs they buffed shields and left armor alone such that it is now possible to take out rep-stacking Gallente tanks. By no means have they been rendered useless by being vulnerable to weapons designed to damage them. That's not really what I take issue with as I agree Repairers never should have gone passive.... it's that HAV don't act like heavily armed and armoured vehicles should. I can agree with this statement. It also means the Forge Guns and Plasma Cannons don't feel like actual antitank weapons, which irks the bejeezus out of me. WoW has taught me that Purple means Legendary. This means Quafe suits are the optimal loadout for killing all of you.
Press Attache The Office of The Attorney General 200	Posted - 2015.10.12 13:35:00 - [34] - Quote Breakin Stuff wrote: MrShooter01 wrote: Summa Militum wrote: Yea, I have killed Duna2002 before in his fancy tank. With Duna once you destroy one of his tanks you will never see him the rest of the match. He will also send you a squad invite and get very angry if you decline Funny he never invited me on the occasions I torched his murder chariots. Bob and I used to hunt him and make him quit ambush for the day after we would catch him a few times. Forum representative for Mr. Hybrid Vayu: The Attorney General.
KEROSIINI-TERO The Rainbow Effect 2	Posted - 2015.10.13 03:18:00 - [35] - Quote Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: Those weak spots are really significant. Here's a clip from the first day of HF FoxFour: https://youtu.be/5UOioTIkC0Y It looked like there were 2 people hitting you one could have possible overheated and the other took over. But either way it was a clean kill harnders were down the took advantage of you being distracted. I'm glad your not one of those tankers that's scream and yell when they died. The fact that Komczak did 5279 damage to me supports that he did that solo. (3700 initial armor - no shields - with four-five rep cycles of about 300 bring the HP total lost close to 5000-5200. I counted five cycles there.) "Today I have been feeling mostly smug." KERO-TRADER is my official Eve character for Dust trading.
Mobius Wyvern Fatal Absolution Bleeding Sun Conglomerate 7	Posted - 2015.10.13 12:07:00 - [36] - Quote True Adamance wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: The people whining about the Hotfix need to stop trying to sweep the big issue under the rug. Armor Repairer Madrugar/Marduk fits had been nearly indestructible for months. With the adjustments to HAVs they buffed shields and left armor alone such that it is now possible to take out rep-stacking Gallente tanks. By no means have they been rendered useless by being vulnerable to weapons designed to damage them. That's not really what I take issue with as I agree Repairers never should have gone passive.... it's that HAV don't act like heavily armed and armoured vehicles should. I was more responding to the reactionary posts of "ALL MY WORK IS WASTED". You don't have the same tendency to flip out over the slightest change that many others seem to. Amidst the blue skies A link from past to future The sheltering wings of the protector
JEDI LORD HOTH 15	Posted - 2015.10.13 12:12:00 - [37] - Quote STANKS! lmao=ƒÿé Abandon Ship514. International Peace Sign incoming throws up middle .l.. finger


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.