| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
postapo wastelander
Corrosive Synergy
No Context
1
   |
Posted - 2015.06.27 01:30:00 -
[151] - Quote
Sergeant Sazu wrote:PLAYSTTION wrote:homosexuality is a sin Ah, yes. I remember that line. "Man shall not lie with man as he does a women. It is an abomination." Notice how it doesn't explain why. No suporting argument, no reasoning whatsoever. Kinda sounds like, I dunno, someone's opinion. Just maybe.
And what about splitted hoof, do every that really big christians really not eat that.
Do ALL christians of US (and any other country) not eat pigs and any other of same kind hows bible told.
Fc\_/k you fecking fanatics.
BACON POWA
"Caller of the Monolith"
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Penumbra or something
7
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 01:35:00 -
[152] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:demens grimwulff wrote:PLAYSTTION wrote:Ok here we go. I'm young an my bible knowledge is pretty small but I will give you context and explain the ones I understand. When you get older, see if your bigoted opinions remain. As someone who has suffered threats of violence, failed college classes, had people threaten to pull work from the company I work for, and watched friends commit suicide from their own harrasement, solely because of a sexual preference one is born with, your opinion in this thread reflects the lack of maturity and experience that you admit to not having. Get out of the surbabanite bubble and see the world. You will change. Correction, your not born with any sexual instinct, straight or otherwise, I wasn't born thinking about getting some p***y or a**, your born with the Natural instinct to survive only. The environment and areas your surrounded by affect your development.
Actually, recent evidence states otherwise.
http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/science-behind-more-meaningful-understanding-sexual-orientation
Not caring about KD
|
Omega Nox
Consolidated Dust
104
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 01:36:00 -
[153] - Quote
postapo wastelander wrote:Sergeant Sazu wrote:PLAYSTTION wrote:homosexuality is a sin Ah, yes. I remember that line. "Man shall not lie with man as he does a women. It is an abomination." Notice how it doesn't explain why. No suporting argument, no reasoning whatsoever. Kinda sounds like, I dunno, someone's opinion. Just maybe. And what about splitted hoof, do every that really big christians really not eat that. Do ALL christians of US (and any other country) not eat pigs and any other of same kind hows bible told. Fc\_/k you fecking fanatics. BACON POWA
Bible told not you said.
Mordu's walking quafe mascot.
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Penumbra or something
7
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 01:38:00 -
[154] - Quote
postapo wastelander wrote:Sergeant Sazu wrote:PLAYSTTION wrote:homosexuality is a sin Ah, yes. I remember that line. "Man shall not lie with man as he does a women. It is an abomination." Notice how it doesn't explain why. No suporting argument, no reasoning whatsoever. Kinda sounds like, I dunno, someone's opinion. Just maybe. And what about splitted hoof, do every that really big christians really not eat that. Do ALL christians of US (and any other country) not eat pigs and any other of same kind hows bible told. Fc\_/k you fecking fanatics. BACON POWA
Speaking of which: why just protests against gay marriage? Why not anti-pork and anti-shrimp protests? Fabric-mixing protests? Tattoo protests?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/8d/6c/2d/8d6c2d97adbb194cb420f9390a7bc82f.jpg
Not caring about KD
|
Operative 1174 Uuali
True Companion Planetary Requisitions
850
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 01:43:00 -
[155] - Quote
Oh boy! Now I'm just waiting until they make it legal to marry my horse. Bruce identifies as a woman; I identify as Wolverine. Where's my admantium claws?
MY CPM2 PLATFORM
|
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
7
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 01:48:00 -
[156] - Quote
Omega Nox wrote:demens grimwulff wrote:REDBACK96USMC wrote:
I think you should read the State Actor Doctrine and rethink that.
State action doctrine is the American legal concept that the protections of the Constitution GÇö such as the Fourteenth and First Amendments GÇö only apply with any real strength to the coercive power of the state against the individual, rather than the coercive power of the individual against the individual. From a legal website... your interpretation is wrong. 14th amendment is upheld, states are required to marry. Sorry. Where in the Constitution is marriage mentioned? It is not and therefore up to the individual states to regulate. Using the 14th Amendment is laughable and shows a level of legal incompetence that is impeachable.
The power of marriage is given to the state, that you are right. But when the state makes a law that infringes on the rights of the people given to them in the Constitution it becomes a federal problem.
"The Wrath of God is Immense. His Justice is Swift and Decisive. His Tolerance is Limited."
|
Dreis ShadowWeaver
0uter.heaven
4
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 01:48:00 -
[157] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:demens grimwulff wrote:PLAYSTTION wrote:Ok here we go. I'm young an my bible knowledge is pretty small but I will give you context and explain the ones I understand. When you get older, see if your bigoted opinions remain. As someone who has suffered threats of violence, failed college classes, had people threaten to pull work from the company I work for, and watched friends commit suicide from their own harrasement, solely because of a sexual preference one is born with, your opinion in this thread reflects the lack of maturity and experience that you admit to not having. Get out of the surbabanite bubble and see the world. You will change. Correction, your not born with any sexual instinct, straight or otherwise, I wasn't born thinking about getting some p***y or a**, your born with the Natural instinct to survive only. The environment and areas your surrounded by affect your development.
I don't believe that. You're actually born with the natural instinct to survive AND REPRODUCE. This would mean that everyone is born with a predisposition to be sexually attracted to the opposite sex. This makes sense, right? After all, it is generally accepted that reproduction is the ultimate goal of any organism, and an instinctive predisposition to be sexually attracted to the opposite sex would aid in this.
I believe that there is a difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals, but I'd need to actually ASK people about this. This is just a theory though. I speculate that where a heterosexual male would be repulsed at the prospect of having sex with another man (because it would be pointless in regards to reproduction), a homosexual male would only be bored or uninterested at the prospect of having sex with a woman, rather than being disgusted and repulsed. This would be because of the natural sexual predisposition to the opposite sex.
How does this explain homosexuality? Well, I don't believe that people can be born homosexual, only with a natural sexual predisposition to the opposite sex, as explained above. I think that homosexuality develops as a result of upbringing. I think that if there are issues with a suitable male role model (a father) in the case of a boy, the boy may not develop a masculine gender identity correctly. I also speculate that a boy's desire to gain the approval of a male role model when young translates into wanting to sexually please other men when they grow up. This makes sense considering that the overwhelming majority of homosexual men have issues communicating with their fathers, or have other issues with the availability of a male role model when young. I realise that I've been mainly focusing on men, but I assume it would work similarly with females.
This is all just a theory however, and actual research would need to be carried out to corroborate it. I'd need to find out how homosexual men and women would feel about having sex with the opposite sex - whether they would feel disgusted or not. I'd also like to know the percentage of homosexual men who had 'daddy issues' when they were young. 
Creator of the 'Nova Knifers United' channel
My Minja Blog
Caldari blood, Matari heart <3
|
Omega Nox
Consolidated Dust
104
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 01:48:00 -
[158] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Void Echo wrote:demens grimwulff wrote:PLAYSTTION wrote:Ok here we go. I'm young an my bible knowledge is pretty small but I will give you context and explain the ones I understand. When you get older, see if your bigoted opinions remain. As someone who has suffered threats of violence, failed college classes, had people threaten to pull work from the company I work for, and watched friends commit suicide from their own harrasement, solely because of a sexual preference one is born with, your opinion in this thread reflects the lack of maturity and experience that you admit to not having. Get out of the surbabanite bubble and see the world. You will change. Correction, your not born with any sexual instinct, straight or otherwise, I wasn't born thinking about getting some p***y or a**, your born with the Natural instinct to survive only. The environment and areas your surrounded by affect your development. Actually, recent evidence states otherwise. http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/science-behind-more-meaningful-understanding-sexual-orientation
Respectfuly, your using the "epigenetics hypothesis" helps to prove not disprove his statement.
Mordu's walking quafe mascot.
|
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
7
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 02:03:00 -
[159] - Quote
Omega Nox wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Dzago Sevatarion wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Can someone explain to me the difference between a marriage and a civil union? Nomenclature. So what will change for same-sex couple's in the US following this ruling? Also, is marriage a necessarily religious ceremony, or can you be married in a non-religious way? The problem is not marriage, the problem is the Federal government and the Supreme court creating law where it has no jurisdiction. Our Constitution is written so that it expressly states what it has legal jurisdiction over. If the matter is not expressly described then the individual states have jurisdiction and the residents of the individual states vote on legislation. The US is a Federal Republic and not a Democracy.
Again you are correct but when the rights of the citizen is being infringed upon and the Constitution is specific on what rights that have, which you should know, it becomes a federal problem. No matter how you try to justify your blatantly obvious disapproval of the subject you can't deny that what the states have been doing was a basic denial of human rights.
"The Wrath of God is Immense. His Justice is Swift and Decisive. His Tolerance is Limited."
|
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
7
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 02:05:00 -
[160] - Quote
Omega Nox wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Dzago Sevatarion wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Can someone explain to me the difference between a marriage and a civil union? Nomenclature. So what will change for same-sex couple's in the US following this ruling? Also, is marriage a necessarily religious ceremony, or can you be married in a non-religious way? The problem is not marriage, the problem is the Federal government and the Supreme court creating law where it has no jurisdiction. Our Constitution is written so that it expressly states what it has legal jurisdiction over. If the matter is not expressly described then the individual states have jurisdiction and the residents of the individual states vote on legislation. The US is a Federal Republic and not a Democracy.
Again you are correct but when the rights of the citizen is being infringed upon and the Constitution is specific on what rights that is, which you should know, it becomes a federal problem. No matter how you try to justify your blatantly obvious disapproval of the subject you can't deny that what the states have been doing was a basic denial of human rights due to religious beliefs.
"The Wrath of God is Immense. His Justice is Swift and Decisive. His Tolerance is Limited."
|
|
|
Daddrobit
You Can Call Me Daddy
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 02:06:00 -
[161] - Quote
Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Dzago Sevatarion wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Can someone explain to me the difference between a marriage and a civil union? Nomenclature. So what will change for same-sex couples in the US following this ruling? Also, is marriage a necessarily religious ceremony, or can you be married in a non-religious way?
Marrige can simply be a legal documentation of the, (hopefully permanent) coupling of two people and it comes with lots of benefits. Off the top of my head:
Hospital visitation rights
Ability to make a medical decision for your spouse if they become incapacitated and can not make it themselves
Ability to make calls on what happens to your spouse postmortem (autopsy, burial, cremation, etc.)
Inheritance rights in case of a spouses death
Lots of federal and state tax benefits
Ability to share employee insurance
Ability to file for insurance packages with "family" rates
Ability to live in housing areas designated "Families Only"
Ability to file for adoption
Ability to file for joint custody, visitation rights, and child support in the case of a divorce
Ability to take sick leave in the event of spousal sickness
Ability to take bereavement leave in the event of the death of a spouse
Ability to renew some legal documents like leases
These and more were all what was really being fought for by the same sex advocates. And it's what the people against were saying they had no right to obtain.
"All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others"
They aren't just fighting for a piece of paper saying "You're Married." They really are fighting for equal rights.
O.G. Pink Fluffy Bunny
|
Omega Nox
Consolidated Dust
104
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 02:10:00 -
[162] - Quote
Nocturnal Soul wrote:Omega Nox wrote:demens grimwulff wrote:REDBACK96USMC wrote:
I think you should read the State Actor Doctrine and rethink that.
State action doctrine is the American legal concept that the protections of the Constitution GÇö such as the Fourteenth and First Amendments GÇö only apply with any real strength to the coercive power of the state against the individual, rather than the coercive power of the individual against the individual. From a legal website... your interpretation is wrong. 14th amendment is upheld, states are required to marry. Sorry. Where in the Constitution is marriage mentioned? It is not and therefore up to the individual states to regulate. Using the 14th Amendment is laughable and shows a level of legal incompetence that is impeachable. The power of marriage is given to the state, that you are right. But when the state makes a law that infringes on the rights of the people given to them in the Constitution it becomes a federal problem.
The Constitution says nothing of marriage, and your rights come from the Bill of Rights which also does not mention marriage.
Marriage was and always covered by Common Law, not Statutory nor Constitutional.
It should be noted that Common Law, is older than history itself.
Now we have 5 liberal elitist, all from New York, pulling "rights" out of thin air, and telling 380 million citizens what the law is.
Am I the only person here that sees the tyrany in this?
The citizens are the boss in the US not some unelected harvard grad wearing a black robe!
Mordu's walking quafe mascot.
|
postapo wastelander
Corrosive Synergy
No Context
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 02:17:00 -
[163] - Quote
Omega Nox wrote:postapo wastelander wrote:Sergeant Sazu wrote:PLAYSTTION wrote:homosexuality is a sin Ah, yes. I remember that line. "Man shall not lie with man as he does a women. It is an abomination." Notice how it doesn't explain why. No suporting argument, no reasoning whatsoever. Kinda sounds like, I dunno, someone's opinion. Just maybe. And what about splitted hoof, do every that really big christians really not eat that. Do ALL christians of US (and any other country) not eat pigs and any other of same kind hows bible told. Fc\_/k you fecking fanatics. BACON POWA Bible told not you said.
Really?!
Boyko i can eat every bibleholic for breakfast and you should eat this.
Sorry for stomp your fanatic dreams XD
"Caller of the Monolith"
|
Dreis ShadowWeaver
0uter.heaven
4
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 02:29:00 -
[164] - Quote
Daddrobit wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Dzago Sevatarion wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Can someone explain to me the difference between a marriage and a civil union? Nomenclature. So what will change for same-sex couples in the US following this ruling? Also, is marriage a necessarily religious ceremony, or can you be married in a non-religious way? Marrige can simply be a legal documentation of the, (hopefully permanent) coupling of two people and it comes with lots of benefits. Off the top of my head: Ability to file for adoption
Wait, gay couples can't adopt in the US?
Heheh, I know it may be a poor source, but have you ever heard of the American Sitcom Modern Family? I remember that there was a gay couple in it who adopted a child. Does this have no factual grounding? 
Creator of the 'Nova Knifers United' channel
My Minja Blog
Caldari blood, Matari heart <3
|
Omega Nox
Consolidated Dust
104
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 02:31:00 -
[165] - Quote
postapo wastelander wrote:Omega Nox wrote:postapo wastelander wrote:Sergeant Sazu wrote:PLAYSTTION wrote:homosexuality is a sin Ah, yes. I remember that line. "Man shall not lie with man as he does a women. It is an abomination." Notice how it doesn't explain why. No suporting argument, no reasoning whatsoever. Kinda sounds like, I dunno, someone's opinion. Just maybe. And what about splitted hoof, do every that really big christians really not eat that. Do ALL christians of US (and any other country) not eat pigs and any other of same kind hows bible told. Fc\_/k you fecking fanatics. BACON POWA Bible told not you said. Really?! Boyko i can eat every bibleholic for breakfast and you should eat this. Sorry for stomp your fanatic dreams XD ergo You are christian and eater of pig meatm you are lier and you will go to hell for it..enjoy boyo XD ALL HAIL THE MIGHTY MONOLITH!!
Really? actually yes, and I know because I can read!
buttercup, please don't be hatin this pig eatin son'o god!
pig is an essential part of every church going Americans breakfast....ummm bacon Merica!
as for your documented ignorance as to diet I refer you back to the B-I-B-L-E, because you are wrong, wrong, wrong.
ok buttercup!
Mordu's walking quafe mascot.
|
Daddrobit
You Can Call Me Daddy
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 02:33:00 -
[166] - Quote
Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Daddrobit wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Dzago Sevatarion wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Can someone explain to me the difference between a marriage and a civil union? Nomenclature. So what will change for same-sex couples in the US following this ruling? Also, is marriage a necessarily religious ceremony, or can you be married in a non-religious way? Marrige can simply be a legal documentation of the, (hopefully permanent) coupling of two people and it comes with lots of benefits. Off the top of my head: Ability to file for adoption Wait, gay couples can't adopt in the US? Heheh, I know it may be a poor source, but have you ever heard of the American Sitcom Modern Family? I remember that there was a gay couple in it who adopted a child. Does this have no factual grounding?
Adoption centers had the option to deny the adoption based on marital status. Prior to this, centers that said, "If you're not married, you can't adopt" were able to deny same sex couples a child because the couple couldn't get married in the first place.
O.G. Pink Fluffy Bunny
|
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
7
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 02:38:00 -
[167] - Quote
Omega Nox wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:Omega Nox wrote:demens grimwulff wrote:REDBACK96USMC wrote:
I think you should read the State Actor Doctrine and rethink that.
State action doctrine is the American legal concept that the protections of the Constitution GÇö such as the Fourteenth and First Amendments GÇö only apply with any real strength to the coercive power of the state against the individual, rather than the coercive power of the individual against the individual. From a legal website... your interpretation is wrong. 14th amendment is upheld, states are required to marry. Sorry. Where in the Constitution is marriage mentioned? It is not and therefore up to the individual states to regulate. Using the 14th Amendment is laughable and shows a level of legal incompetence that is impeachable. The power of marriage is given to the state, that you are right. But when the state makes a law that infringes on the rights of the people given to them in the Constitution it becomes a federal problem. The Constitution says nothing of marriage, and your rights come from the Bill of Rights which also does not mention marriage. Marriage was and always covered by Common Law, not Statutory nor Constitutional. It should be noted that Common Law, is older than history itself. Now we have 5 liberal elitist, all from New York, pulling "rights" out of thin air, and telling 380 million citizens what the law is. Am I the only person here that sees the tyrany in this? The citizens are the boss in the US not some unelected harvard grad wearing a black robe!
1. I literally just said that
2. 14 Amendment, No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
3. the states obvious disrespect for the rights of its citizens has shown itself in this matter and the Constitution has been interpreted by those given the power to do so. If you don't like it have the Constitution amended(that's a joke because that **** ain't gonna happen since every state has to agree..looking at you Mississippi and Texas o_o).
4. No matter how hard you try to sound right, you're still going to be wrong so deal with it. It's honestly not going to be the end of the world as you know. You're still going to wake up and do whatever the hell you do like yesterday so please stop being a ****.
"The Wrath of God is Immense. His Justice is Swift and Decisive. His Tolerance is Limited."
|
Louis Domi
Tugastroy
936
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 03:24:00 -
[168] - Quote
Guys and Gals come on You know the rules of conversation:
No talking about religion
No talking about politics
(Thats basically it)
If you don't follow these rules fights will break out, the walls ooze blood, Gentlemen act like asses. The discussion of gay marriage falls under both of these categories. Of course if you want to fight about it go ahead... But we can all agree
Close minded people take the L on this one.. Don't fight it... Just take the L.. |
Yokal Bob
Dead Man's Game
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 03:25:00 -
[169] - Quote
oh give it a rest already
Vote Dust for PS4
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Penumbra or something
7
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 04:08:00 -
[170] - Quote
Louis Domi wrote:Guys and Gals come on You know the rules of conversation:
No talking about religion
No talking about politics
(Thats basically it)
If you don't follow these rules fights will break out, the walls ooze blood, Gentlemen act like asses. The discussion of gay marriage falls under both of these categories. Of course if you want to fight about it go ahead... But we can all agree
Close minded people take the L on this one.. Don't fight it... Just take the L..
I've actually had one legendary (several week long) online conversation about religion from conflicting viewpoints that actually turned out quite well.
It just helps when at least 1 on each side isn't a closed-minded ****.
We ended up helping each other out against random rude ******* that tried popping into the discussion.
Not caring about KD
|
|
|
Stupid Blueberry
RED 0MEN.
Evil Syndicate Alliance.
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 04:14:00 -
[171] - Quote
The U.S. has needed some good news in light of all this racial stuff going on 
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
Haajakin Kalen.
Blueberry smokin' that crack y'all
|
SLENDER M4N
Xer Cloud Consortium
630
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 04:22:00 -
[172] - Quote
Gay marriage in the States is cool and all but im more worried about who t'f our president is gonna be. Isn't Fooking Donald Trump running for office? What aboot that Hillary Lady? 'Murica is getting unstable with all these tards running for president.
Our Lord and savior, Munson punched me and RE'd me! I feel loved <3
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Penumbra or something
7
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 04:35:00 -
[173] - Quote
Stupid Blueberry wrote:The U.S. has needed some good news in light of all this racial stuff going on
Almost all of the racial stuff is caused/amplified by the media having nothing better to report on, though.
Edit: I may or may not have just brought race into this thread, butt fick it
Not caring about KD
|
Deputy ReGnUM
Bragian Order
Amarr Empire
52
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 04:39:00 -
[174] - Quote
Panthrax Oblivion wrote:
Uhh I'm grilling out on the beach with my bros today soo....I don't think so
R U even aesthetic? |
Stupid Blueberry
RED 0MEN.
Evil Syndicate Alliance.
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 04:54:00 -
[175] - Quote
SLENDER M4N wrote:Gay marriage in the States is cool and all but im more worried about who t'f our president is gonna be. Isn't Fooking Donald Trump running for office? What aboot that Hillary Lady? 'Murica is getting unstable with all these tards running for president.
Donald Trump becomes POTUS
The Caldari State is born
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
Haajakin Kalen.
Blueberry smokin' that crack y'all
|
Louis Domi
Tugastroy
937
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 05:10:00 -
[176] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Louis Domi wrote:Guys and Gals come on You know the rules of conversation:
No talking about religion
No talking about politics
(Thats basically it)
If you don't follow these rules fights will break out, the walls ooze blood, Gentlemen act like asses. The discussion of gay marriage falls under both of these categories. Of course if you want to fight about it go ahead... But we can all agree
Close minded people take the L on this one.. Don't fight it... Just take the L.. I've actually had one legendary (several week long) online conversation about religion from conflicting viewpoints that actually turned out quite well. It just helps when at least 1 on each side isn't a closed-minded ****. We ended up helping each other out against random rude ******* that tried popping into the discussion.
I've actually had one or two similar conversations about religion in my US history class it turned out quite nice since we were all friends. Most of my other conversations about those topics don't end up that way.
(Hate it most when I'm forced into an argument about politics with friends and a couple of them just assume you're with a certain political party, and I'm just there like "No political preference here guys. If the person can do their job right and has convinced me so then I will indeed cast my vote to that person" Then even after that they will still label you with a certain politcal party as if they did not just hear the one time you talked during that entire argument...) You sir are lucky
|
rayakalj9
Opus Arcana
Covert Intervention
27
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 08:32:00 -
[177] - Quote
Pierced Daddy wrote:Panthrax Oblivion wrote:A sad dark day for my country It's a very sad joyful day. Now me and you can finally get married my love. Don't be ashamed of our love for each other. I know it's been tough coming out of the closet but I'm proud of you. You can wear the tux tonite handsome
lol..hahaha this made my day
born jamaican
|
Starlight Burner
Arrary of Clusters
293
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 09:00:00 -
[178] - Quote
Who cares?
EDIT: & shouldn't this be in locker room?
CEO of Arrary of Clusters, a close relations corporation
Caldari Factional Warfare, enlist today!
Thank you for DUST
|
sir RAVEN WING
No Context
3
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 11:53:00 -
[179] - Quote
4lbert Wesker wrote:No matter if you are homosexual or heterosexual,I hate you all.
I am asexual.
DO YOU LOVE ME YET?
The bird has flown away for a while. Leave a message at the tone
Gon' Flying, be back soon.
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
513
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 12:41:00 -
[180] - Quote
Omega Nox wrote:
The Constitution says nothing of marriage, and your rights come from the Bill of Rights which also does not mention marriage.
Marriage was and always covered by Common Law, not Statutory nor Constitutional.
It should be noted that Common Law, is older than history itself.
Now we have 5 liberal elitist, all from New York, pulling "rights" out of thin air, and telling 380 million citizens what the law is.
Am I the only person here that sees the tyrany in this?
The citizens are the boss in the US not some unelected harvard grad wearing a black robe!
You are wrong. Your bias is blinding you.
The US government has the ability to rule over several things, including the rights of the people and whether states are upholding them, inter-state commerce and issues that harm ir, and taxation on the federal level.
1) this is a rights issue and has been determined to be one, therefore the US government can rule on it
2) the inter-state commerce clause does not need to be used, but can be as there is precedence on record
3) marriage carries a different taxation structure in the US, giving the US government the immediate ability to rule on it. If they can tax it, they can make laws on it.
Sneaky Nando #4) no where in the Constitution does it state that the US Supreme Court has to be bound by the constitution. What kind of silly, last hope logic are they spewing at you? The Supreme Court is the final arbiter over whether or not something is illegal or legal, and they have ruled that the 14th Amendment covers gay marriage, NOT what you're think.
I am so very happy that I can finally say this, but you are on the wrong side of history.
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |