|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
468
   |
Posted - 2015.06.26 16:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
Congratulations, it is now legal
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/06/27/us/supreme-court-same-sex-marriage.html?referrer=
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
468
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 16:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
REDBACK96USMC wrote:Well Technically it isnt legal yet, but the legal precedent has been set for States to do so if they please. In the end it is still up to the States to decide.
I assume States like Texas and such will still not recognize it internally since they don't give a crap about federal funding.
Not true: ruling states that the 14th amendment is extended to cover gay marriage, overriding state opinions on the matter. Texas' Attorney General says to not issue, but he has no legal basis for the claim and it will be forced in court.
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
471
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 16:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
http://hypetrain.website/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/salt.jpg
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
474
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 17:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
Daddrobit wrote:
What the ever loving ****?
The Treaty of Tripoli, Article 11: "The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion..."
Written at the end of George Washington's second term, and signed during John Adams.
Congratulations to all those finally gaining the equal right to legally love another human being!
totally on topic important NF business:
Dad, next time you are on, NF requests your soothing voice to grace us with the reading of various Kain Spero fan fiction.
Aeon Amadi tried, but it isn't the same as your buttery smooth voice.
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
474
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 17:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
Songs of Seraphim wrote:demens grimwulff wrote:http://hypetrain.website/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/salt.jpg I'm saving this image. XD
Good man ;)
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
477
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 17:31:00 -
[6] - Quote
Daddrobit wrote:But seriously though, Hynox needs to get his derriere in gear and write more delightful dragon dildo drama for me to disclose!
^ This
You have the perfect voice for the drama, love, and emotions he expresses in his writings
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
477
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 17:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
REDBACK96USMC wrote:
I think you should read the State Actor Doctrine and rethink that.
State action doctrine is the American legal concept that the protections of the Constitution GÇö such as the Fourteenth and First Amendments GÇö only apply with any real strength to the coercive power of the state against the individual, rather than the coercive power of the individual against the individual.
From a legal website... your interpretation is wrong. 14th amendment is upheld, states are required to marry. Sorry.
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
481
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 17:47:00 -
[8] - Quote
Daddrobit wrote:demens grimwulff wrote:Daddrobit wrote:But seriously though, Hynox needs to get his derriere in gear and write more delightful dragon dildo drama for me to disclose! ^ This You have the perfect voice for the drama, love, and emotions he expresses in his writings Alright, I didn't need sleep, I'm on now...
Awww :( @ work... tonight is NF drunk night if you're still awake
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
482
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 17:56:00 -
[9] - Quote
Daddrobit wrote: I work night shifts... Our love... Can it survive the dark rigors of conflicting work schedules? Well at least the Supreme Court seems to think so! 
We will always have love and hope, dad
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
485
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 18:27:00 -
[10] - Quote
PLAYSTTION wrote:Ok here we go. I'm young an my bible knowledge is pretty small but I will give you context and explain the ones I understand.
When you get older, see if your bigoted opinions remain.
As someone who has suffered threats of violence, failed college classes, had people threaten to pull work from the company I work for, and watched friends commit suicide from their own harrasement, solely because of a sexual preference one is born with, your opinion in this thread reflects the lack of maturity and experience that you admit to not having.
Get out of the surbabanite bubble and see the world. You will change.
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
|
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
487
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 18:31:00 -
[11] - Quote
Sergeant Sazu wrote:"This several thousand year old book says dehumanizing people is okay, so it must be okay."
I'm getting really pissed off at the homophobes in this thread. Keep cherrypicking from your storybook.
Oh, and before anyone gets any ideas; I'm your average straight, non-religious, over-privileged white teenager. Except many of my friends are not heterosexual, and I'm trying to fathom why people want to stick their nose in other people's lives and tell them how to feel and what they're allowed to do. But, you know, "God loves everyone, except for those gay people. Make sure they don't have basic human rights because the way you roll is the 'right way' and anyone who doesn't is invalid."
...Whoa. I got salty.
9/10, you got me. GG
I made the post once I noticed my qqcup was empty. It has filled up several times since then, and my life force has been sustained.
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
487
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 18:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
PLAYSTTION wrote:
Your right I will change! My beliefs will become more solid and my knowledge will expand. I went on a missions trip to Honduras to "see the world" when I was 13 and I did change. Building up that village was amazing.
http://theconversation.com/why-the-murder-rate-in-honduras-is-twice-as-high-as-anywhere-else-34687
Have you read anything on Honduras? I work with Hondurans... they giggled at your post. Your bubble remained intact, as expected.
Go, see the real world... don't be sheltered.
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
487
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 18:47:00 -
[13] - Quote
Panthrax Oblivion wrote:PLAYSTTION is explaining his point through a Christian perspective and interpreting all the Biblical passages to shed some light that God is not as cruel as everyone thinks. How does this make him immature? If anything, you are for attacking his beliefs. Give your opinion, let each person believe what they want to, and go back to more important things than getting salty on a silly thread
*facepalms*
maturity
[muh-choo r-i-tee, -too r-, -tyoo r-, -chur-]
noun
1.
the state of being mature; ripeness:
The fruit will reach maturity in a few days.
2.
full development; perfected condition:
maturity of judgment; to bring a plan to maturity
I am glad you used the psychological definition, which through proper interpretation you will notice through context that I did not, as it points out your opinions and views on the matter.
I am not attacking his age so much as lack of experience outside of the bubble his family has put him in. His opinions aren't that mature and require more time to fully develop. Though I do appreciate your injection of your own bias... it is quite telling.
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
487
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 18:55:00 -
[14] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Did. You. Just. Compare. Homosexuality. With. Criminality?
I believe so, yes.
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
487
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 18:57:00 -
[15] - Quote
PLAYSTTION wrote:Thanks, I am enjoying answering these questions actually. Its easy throughout the internet where the questions come slower. IRL when people bash me it is question after question with no time for an answer. Its also always 5v1.
Not sure why you are thanking him. He did nothing besides misinterpret my statement... unless you did the same and felt like he pointed it out... at which point, my statement still applies, but to both of you.
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
488
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 19:00:00 -
[16] - Quote
PLAYSTTION wrote:
I understand my mind is not fully there yet but my faith is my own. My family started it but I have taken it up.
1 Timothy 4:12
[ESV]
Let no one despise you for your youth, but set the believers an example in speech, in conduct, in love, in faith, in purity.
[NSV]
Don't let anyone look down on you because you are young, but set an example for the believers in speech, in conduct, in love, in faith and in purity.
Profound, but misguided.
I am not looking down on you because of your age, I am just pointing out that your bigoted opinions will change in time, as your exposure to the world has been limited. Much like discussions in public forums, I am sure.
If a 40 year old had said the same, I would have responded in the same manner... your opinions reflect that of someone whow has not spent time amongst the world. Your otherization of homosexuality is, in part, how this is easily recognizeable.
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
488
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 19:01:00 -
[17] - Quote
Eruditus 920 wrote:Well, it's official. You can now post anything you want in GD. The Locker Room is dead. This is the worst thread I have ever read here. If you live long enough, one becomes aware of one singular universal truth: it is pointless to discuss religion and politics in mixed company. They are the most personal of topics, and you will never change someone's mind. I am pleased, however, that my Great State of Texas has been referenced as it is the only truly relevant US state. There's Texas, then everyone else. There is no ambivalence. No one ever brags about being from Delaware. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbJC6recwOQ
Houston, you?
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
488
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 19:04:00 -
[18] - Quote
PLAYSTTION wrote:I compared a sin with a sin in a relatable analogy. Again, I do not claim to be all knowing on this topic .
And my point there was if a friend was going down a bad path...
It was the only non-christian example I had, as adultery and other things aren't as severe to non-believers.
Wow.
... wow.
Ummm... wow...
I... wow. /done
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
488
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 19:07:00 -
[19] - Quote
Eruditus 920 wrote:
Dallas!
Mmmm... I love NE Dallas...
Dallas is like a clean, more refined, and gnerally nicer version of Houston :/
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
489
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 19:09:00 -
[20] - Quote
PLAYSTTION wrote:I clarified more in an edit to that.
" I used an extreme to get my point across"
NEVER use an extreme case when discussing a topic.
Just a tip.
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
|
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
489
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 19:13:00 -
[21] - Quote
Eruditus 920 wrote:I'm in the suburbs now but Big D is home, where I was born.
Houston is good times, crazy zoning laws though.
Now if the Longhorns could just get a quarterback...
Houston zoning can only be understood if you're a lawyer or under large doses of drugs.
F-Aggies recruitment is too strong... UT will have a hard time recruiting strong blood :/
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
513
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 12:41:00 -
[22] - Quote
Omega Nox wrote:
The Constitution says nothing of marriage, and your rights come from the Bill of Rights which also does not mention marriage.
Marriage was and always covered by Common Law, not Statutory nor Constitutional.
It should be noted that Common Law, is older than history itself.
Now we have 5 liberal elitist, all from New York, pulling "rights" out of thin air, and telling 380 million citizens what the law is.
Am I the only person here that sees the tyrany in this?
The citizens are the boss in the US not some unelected harvard grad wearing a black robe!
You are wrong. Your bias is blinding you.
The US government has the ability to rule over several things, including the rights of the people and whether states are upholding them, inter-state commerce and issues that harm ir, and taxation on the federal level.
1) this is a rights issue and has been determined to be one, therefore the US government can rule on it
2) the inter-state commerce clause does not need to be used, but can be as there is precedence on record
3) marriage carries a different taxation structure in the US, giving the US government the immediate ability to rule on it. If they can tax it, they can make laws on it.
Sneaky Nando #4) no where in the Constitution does it state that the US Supreme Court has to be bound by the constitution. What kind of silly, last hope logic are they spewing at you? The Supreme Court is the final arbiter over whether or not something is illegal or legal, and they have ruled that the 14th Amendment covers gay marriage, NOT what you're think.
I am so very happy that I can finally say this, but you are on the wrong side of history.
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
513
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 16:11:00 -
[23] - Quote
Louis Domi wrote:Starlight Burner wrote:Who cares?
EDIT: & shouldn't this be in locker room? It actually is in Locker room. Seeing as how most people use General I guess he must've added one here to get the word out.
^^^^^
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
513
|
Posted - 2015.06.28 14:14:00 -
[24] - Quote
Mex-0 wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:You're actually born with the natural instinct to survive AND REPRODUCE. The beautiful thing about living in the future is that you no longer need a Man and Woman to have a baby :D I really hope you're talking about adoption.
NSFW due to topic: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/scientists-create-artificial-human-eggs-and-sperm/
Right now, only a male dna code would work for this
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
513
|
Posted - 2015.06.28 14:29:00 -
[25] - Quote
Fire of Prometheus wrote:Don't come to Canada....we've made it legal for about a decade
Shhhhhhhh! You're not supposed to tell them! We want them gone ;.;
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
515
|
Posted - 2015.06.28 15:44:00 -
[26] - Quote
Mex-0 wrote:What about in rabbits?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mammals_displaying_homosexual_behavior
If you're referring to the pink, fluffy variety, I know at least one who does ;) (it isn't Dad, either)
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
demens grimwulff
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
516
|
Posted - 2015.06.28 21:46:00 -
[27] - Quote
Omega Nox wrote:Well if you are correct, let the stoning begin!
fortunately for you! you are absolutely ignorant of the law, and what it was in the beginning.
wrong, wrong, wrong!
Funny, then, as the new testament doesn't really mention homosexuality at all. Without the old testament still applying, then you have no Christian argument against. And I quote:
In the New Testament (NT) there are at least three passages that may refer to homosexual activity: Romans 1:26GÇô27, 1 Corinthians 6:9GÇô10, and 1 Timothy 1:9GÇô10. A fourth passage, Jude 1:7, is often interpreted as referring to homosexuality. None of the four gospels mentions the subject directly, and there is nothing about homosexuality in the Book of Acts, in Hebrews, in Revelation, or in the letters attributed to James, Peter, and John. Jesus may be restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples when he cites Genesis during a discussion of marriage (Matthew 19:4-6 and Mark 10:6-9).
The presumed references to 'homosexuality' itself in the New Testament hinge on the interpretation of three specific Greek words, arsenokoit-ôs (ß+Ç-ü-â+¦+++++¦+++»-ä++-é), malakos (+++¦+++¦+¦-î-é), and porneia.[1][2] While it is not disputed that the three Greek words concern sexual relations between men (and possibly between women), some academics interpret the relevant passages as a prohibition against pederasty or prostitution rather than homosexuality per se, while other scholars have presented counter arguments.[3][4][5] The historical context of the passages has also been a subject of debate.
As the archeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end
|
|
|
| |
|