DUST Search - How would you guys feel if

All Channels

General Discussions

How would you guys feel if

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Aeon Amadi Negative-Feedback. Negative-Feedback 9979	Posted - 2015.05.09 20:05:00 - [1] - Quote CCP put new content and balancing on hold for a month or two to work solely on nothing but bug fixes? You guys are like a broken record with this "CPM material" business xD Let it go
Eruditus 920 Nemo Malus Felix 1822	Posted - 2015.05.09 20:14:00 - [2] - Quote As an end user, I would love it. Makes a lot of common sense, doesn't it? I suspect, though Rattati could never admit it, that the ones at CCP controlling the purse strings, have mandated that work on DUST should be focused on action items that generate interest and revenue going forward in perpetuity. My own personal speculation. "Stay gold, Ponyboy..."
Sergeant Sazu Mantodea MC 454	Posted - 2015.05.09 20:29:00 - [3] - Quote I would wait as long as it takes. -Dat loading wheel of death and despair... and disconnection -Ferroscales not getting the efficacy bonus -The redline timer being inaccurate and continuing even after you leave it These are the ones that make me bittervet. (If that was a verb) [56.1m SP, Next skill: Minmatar Sentinel 5] Veteran Assault - Expert Logibro - Aspiring Minja - Speedy Sentinel
PARKOUR PRACTIONER Rebels New Republic The Ditanian Alliance 2833	Posted - 2015.05.09 20:55:00 - [4] - Quote I would feel happy. Knowing the wait is worth it. Minmatar-Daredevil, blind but smart & resourceful, & no qualms about smashing faces Autistic Athletic Nerd Bring it
Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 7377	Posted - 2015.05.09 21:05:00 - [5] - Quote Nothing would make me happier. Okay, maybe a few things... Bug fix patches are best patches!
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 8510	Posted - 2015.05.09 21:07:00 - [6] - Quote as long as inertia/strafing fixes are included, hell yes There's never enough sh**posting going on, so let's add a few more teaspoons of the guy posting after me to the recipie!
Nocturnal Soul Primordial Threat 6294	Posted - 2015.05.09 21:14:00 - [7] - Quote Wouldn't matter to me personally as I've gotten use to the unexpected but for the betterment of the game sure. (Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ. LASERS BTCH!!!!!! The Incursions are back... and they're golden baby!
Aeon Amadi Negative-Feedback. Negative-Feedback 9986	Posted - 2015.05.09 21:16:00 - [8] - Quote Breakin Stuff wrote: as long as inertia/strafing fixes are included, hell yes You guys are like a broken record with this "CPM material" business xD Let it go
Talos Vagheitan Ancient Exiles. 1223	Posted - 2015.05.09 22:46:00 - [9] - Quote Depends what's fixed. I think streamlining map design and player movement would be well worth it. For example: - Being able to hurdle over waist-height railings. - If they made it so my character never had another seizure while moving or aiming on uneven terrain. I really hate that. - Smoothing out all the terrain. Trust me, it sucks for new players to see someone run up a hill, try to follow, run into numerous invisible dead ends, start jumping, run out of stamina, see their 1 CM jump height, feel useless, then get killed in the back by protostompers. Let everyone run up hills! - Better visual distinction of what can be walked up. Like above, if a player can't run over something, give some sort of visual cue. Most of the non-traversable terrain in Dust looks completely traversable, compounding the problem. - LAV's should be way less clunky. - Nerf camera shake. Make it shake less. Or make it proportional to fall height, so 1 CM drops don't move your reticle. Or make it only shake when you do the sprint-jump. In any case, I really want the jump-seizures to stop. I'd be 100% down for this type of streamlining. Who cares what some sniper has to say. **--CCP, let's push for the license of Dust/Legion on both current Gen consoles-
thor424 Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 155	Posted - 2015.05.09 22:59:00 - [10] - Quote After PC 2.0, I think it's time to get that out. But I do hope after that things get cleaned up. Thor's Emporium

VAHZZ 1866	Posted - 2015.05.09 23:03:00 - [11] - Quote PC 2.0 and then nothing but bug fixes. NOTHING. BUT. BUG. FIXES. WOULD. MAKE. ME. HAPPY. C.C.P. "I bring nothing; I bless nothing, I save nothing, I just; erase. Completely. Shatter."
Cypher Nil Fireteam Tempest 287	Posted - 2015.05.09 23:05:00 - [12] - Quote I love the idea but at the same time if nothing new came about for a month i think the game would finally die out n++pâçGòÉS+Ç 28+ Million SP Merc n++pâçGòÉS+Ç Gû¼Gû¼+¦GòÉGòÉGòÉn¦ñ Caldari Loyalist Gû¼Gû¼+¦GòÉGòÉGòÉn¦ñ Of course we won, now when do I get paid?
Cyzad4 Blackfish Corp. 746	Posted - 2015.05.09 23:10:00 - [13] - Quote as much as "no new stuff" sucks "no new stuff"<"old broke **** is fixed" Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair.
Soldner VonKuechle SAM-MIK General Tso's Alliance 2305	Posted - 2015.05.09 23:22:00 - [14] - Quote If they can fix net coding in two months ill just assign a fair amount of my milk check to them. Better netcoding and plugged memory leaks. Last pieces of the broken puzlzle.
ToRgUe77 21	Posted - 2015.05.10 00:16:00 - [15] - Quote absolutely. definitely rather have no fatal errors over new aur skinsncrap
Vrain Matari Mikramurka Shock Troop Minmatar Republic 2741	Posted - 2015.05.10 00:30:00 - [16] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP put new content and balancing on hold for a month or two to work solely on nothing but bug fixes? I'd be 100% behind them on that. Hell, i'd even spend $20 dollars on the game out of a kind of mushy-headed sentimentality for ol' times sake. Which beats the $0 dollars that i've spent since the Rouge wedding. PSN: RationalSpark
Vrain Matari Mikramurka Shock Troop Minmatar Republic 2741	Posted - 2015.05.10 00:33:00 - [17] - Quote Eruditus 920 wrote: As an end user, I would love it. Makes a lot of common sense, doesn't it? I suspect, though Rattati could never admit it, that the ones at CCP controlling the purse strings, have mandated that work on DUST should be focused on action items that generate interest and revenue going forward in perpetuity. My own personal speculation. My speculation: Dust 514 is now CCP Z's marketing model testbed. PSN: RationalSpark
Scheneighnay McBob And the ButtPirates 6501	Posted - 2015.05.10 00:35:00 - [18] - Quote That was more or less the development system in beta. Didn't work for ****, just slowed down progress while changing how everything is broken. Some details can be ignored
Soldner VonKuechle SAM-MIK General Tso's Alliance 2311	Posted - 2015.05.10 00:41:00 - [19] - Quote Vrain Matari wrote: Eruditus 920 wrote: As an end user, I would love it. Makes a lot of common sense, doesn't it? I suspect, though Rattati could never admit it, that the ones at CCP controlling the purse strings, have mandated that work on DUST should be focused on action items that generate interest and revenue going forward in perpetuity. My own personal speculation. My speculation: Dust 514 is now CCP Z's marketing model testbed. Now? Sheet son, apex release and quafe treats were the start of Z revealing himself as the puppet master of monies. Better netcoding and plugged memory leaks. Last pieces of the broken puzlzle.
Mejt0 Dead Man's Game RUST415 1357	Posted - 2015.05.10 01:53:00 - [20] - Quote Won't happen unfortunately. It takes them very long just to test things. Finding a solution takes three times more. Caldari Loyalist thecreaturehub fan

Ripley Riley Incorruptibles 9988	Posted - 2015.05.10 02:12:00 - [21] - Quote I could stand for an entire patch dedicated to bugs, large and small. Perhaps a second patch focusing on optimization. I don't see it happening though. The reality is Dust 514 does not offer enough content to generate consistent, steady profit on it's own merit. Every patch must have something that drives aurum sales. Without aurum sales CCP cannot justify keeping Dust 514 online. @Ripley_Riley "Ripley > Soraya" - Arkena Wyrnspire
Golden Day Corrosive Synergy Rise Of Legion. 1685	Posted - 2015.05.10 02:14:00 - [22] - Quote We can give more money to CCP by letting boosters be traded "Dust came into New Eden with a hugeass battle, Dust can leave New Eden with a hugeass battle" Scheneighnay McBob
TEXA5 HiTM4N ROGUE SPADES 609	Posted - 2015.05.10 02:18:00 - [23] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP put new content and balancing on hold for a month or two to work solely on nothing but bug fixes? they did try that but they ended up making legion instead
Tech Ohm Eaven Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 1792	Posted - 2015.05.10 04:42:00 - [24] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP put new content and balancing on hold for a month or two to work solely on nothing but bug fixes? ***** please Its a business When profits outnumber debts then dust 514 lives When debts outnumber profits then dust 514 dies Remember when we had a single build then for the next six months Ccp said they were doing bug fixes? Yeah._._.Lol._.The checks in the mail
Tech Ohm Eaven Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 1792	Posted - 2015.05.10 04:45:00 - [25] - Quote TEXA5 HiTM4N wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP put new content and balancing on hold for a month or two to work solely on nothing but bug fixes? they did try that but they ended up making legion instead Ccp tried bug fixes for six months and Brandon Laurino quit
Tech Ohm Eaven Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 1792	Posted - 2015.05.10 04:46:00 - [26] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: I could stand for an entire patch dedicated to bugs, large and small. Perhaps a second patch focusing on optimization. I don't see it happening though. The reality is Dust 514 does not offer enough content to generate consistent, steady profit on it's own merit. Every patch must have something that drives aurum sales. Without aurum sales CCP cannot justify keeping Dust 514 online. See this guy gets that Its a business
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 8548	Posted - 2015.05.10 05:04:00 - [27] - Quote Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Ripley Riley wrote: I could stand for an entire patch dedicated to bugs, large and small. Perhaps a second patch focusing on optimization. I don't see it happening though. The reality is Dust 514 does not offer enough content to generate consistent, steady profit on it's own merit. Every patch must have something that drives aurum sales. Without aurum sales CCP cannot justify keeping Dust 514 online. See this guy gets that Its a business The question was "would we like it/be cool with it," not "do we consider it likely." There's never enough sh**posting going on, so let's add a few more teaspoons of the guy posting after me to the recipie!
Matius Indectus Shadow of the Raven 16	Posted - 2015.05.10 05:06:00 - [28] - Quote Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Ripley Riley wrote: I could stand for an entire patch dedicated to bugs, large and small. Perhaps a second patch focusing on optimization. I don't see it happening though. The reality is Dust 514 does not offer enough content to generate consistent, steady profit on it's own merit. Every patch must have something that drives aurum sales. Without aurum sales CCP cannot justify keeping Dust 514 online. See this guy gets that Its a business That plays to the free to play mentality well, but I will pose a question to you. If the games shooting and core mechanics are not optimized and streamlined will anybody new to the game put up with it? The answer is no. The amount of weapons and gear doesn't play as big a role as you might think, other shooters have like CoD and battlefield have just as much content maybe even less in a way. I have said this a lot, how the game play as an FPS doesn't compare to its competitors. Dust will not retain players because noobs will just think the controls and core shooter mechanics suck. All the shiny officer and aur gear and weapons will not compensate for poorly designed core mechanics. It's like building a house, you don't start with walls and roofing, you start with the foundation. If you can't read in between the lines, then what makes you think you can write?
Tech Ohm Eaven Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 1792	Posted - 2015.05.10 05:23:00 - [29] - Quote Matius Indectus wrote: Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Ripley Riley wrote: I could stand for an entire patch dedicated to bugs, large and small. Perhaps a second patch focusing on optimization. I don't see it happening though. The reality is Dust 514 does not offer enough content to generate consistent, steady profit on it's own merit. Every patch must have something that drives aurum sales. Without aurum sales CCP cannot justify keeping Dust 514 online. See this guy gets that Its a business That plays to the free to play mentality well, but I will pose a question to you. If the games shooting and core mechanics are not optimized and streamlined will anybody new to the game put up with it? The answer is no. The amount of weapons and gear doesn't play as big a role as you might think, other shooters have like CoD and battlefield have just as much content maybe even less in a way. I have said this a lot, how the game play as an FPS doesn't compare to its competitors. Dust will not retain players because noobs will just think the controls and core shooter mechanics suck. All the shiny officer and aur gear and weapons will not compensate for poorly designed core mechanics. It's like building a house, you don't start with walls and roofing, you start with the foundation. No You start with a ft2 sustainable business plan that includes plenty of carrots instead sticks i.e. Warframe Bugfixes and new content expansion simultaneously on that game Versus Ccp ? Please ._.Two years ago folks wanted to PAY for custom area nameplate on suits and vehicles Ccp said no Folks wanted custom colors Ccp said no Folks wanted to PAY for custom laser colors Ccp said no Folks wanted to PAY for clan tag on suit and vehicle Ccp said no Ccp needs to get schooled on ft2 sustainable business plan for a console that includes increased playerbase
Tech Ohm Eaven Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 1792	Posted - 2015.05.10 05:29:00 - [30] - Quote Breakin Stuff wrote: Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Ripley Riley wrote: I could stand for an entire patch dedicated to bugs, large and small. Perhaps a second patch focusing on optimization. I don't see it happening though. The reality is Dust 514 does not offer enough content to generate consistent, steady profit on it's own merit. Every patch must have something that drives aurum sales. Without aurum sales CCP cannot justify keeping Dust 514 online. See this guy gets that Its a business The question was "would we like it/be cool with it," not "do we consider it likely." The problem is Ccp only listens to server player numbers I hope they are listening to my ps4 only game play along with by now 23 million ps4 console games players

Maken Tosch DUST University Ivy League 11611	Posted - 2015.05.10 06:41:00 - [31] - Quote That would be a great idea but there is a problem. The game needs to continue making money and that means Rattati has to maintain a balance between focusing on bug fixes and introducing more content. Let me give you an analogy to better explain why. Pretend that I am an aircraft mechanic working for an airline. A commercial jet rolls into the hangar and is due for an annual inspection. However, since the aircraft is needed in action as often as possible to maintain revenue for the airline and since an aircraft on ground is an aircraft that is NOT making any money, we already filed the necessary paperwork to perform a progressive inspection instead. A progressive inspection is exactly like an annual inspection only it is performed at set intervals (usually every month) over the course of an entire year rather than being performed all at once. On the first month we inspect the wings. The following month we inspect the tail section. The month after that we inspect the landing gear, hydraulic & pneumatic systems, and so on and so forth until the 12th month when finally sign it off as completed and say it's airworthy. In the meantime, the aircraft continues to fly for the airline to make more money. This is preferred over doing the entire inspection process all in one go. Congratulations, you just learned something new that you probably won't even bother to use for the rest of your life unless you're an aircraft mechanic like me. Eve Online Invite https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=ed64524f-15ca-4997-ab92-eaae0af74b7f&action=buddy
Tech Ohm Eaven Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 1792	Posted - 2015.05.10 06:59:00 - [32] - Quote Maken Tosch wrote: That would be a great idea but there is a problem. The game needs to continue making money and that means Rattati has to maintain a balance between focusing on bug fixes and introducing more content. Let me give you an analogy to better explain why. Pretend that I am an aircraft mechanic working for an airline. A commercial jet rolls into the hangar and is due for an annual inspection. However, since the aircraft is needed in action as often as possible to maintain revenue for the airline and since an aircraft on ground is an aircraft that is NOT making any money, we already filed the necessary paperwork to perform a progressive inspection instead. A progressive inspection is exactly like an annual inspection only it is performed at set intervals (usually every month) over the course of an entire year rather than being performed all at once. On the first month we inspect the wings. The following month we inspect the tail section. The month after that we inspect the landing gear, hydraulic & pneumatic systems, and so on and so forth until the 12th month when finally sign it off as completed and say it's airworthy. In the meantime, the aircraft continues to fly for the airline to make more money. This is preferred over doing the entire inspection process all in one go. Congratulations, you just learned something new that you probably won't even bother to use for the rest of your life unless you're an aircraft mechanic like me. Orly? -60 used on what plane? Item was called a DASH sixty
Maken Tosch DUST University Ivy League 11612	Posted - 2015.05.10 07:22:00 - [33] - Quote Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Orly? -60 used on what plane? Item was called a DASH sixty I'm just recently certified and I was only using the airline part as an analogy. But a quick search on AviationPros reveals that you're talking about a power unit used for testing things like landing gear retraction or any other part of the aircraft that relies on hydraulic power. Given its design, I would probably say it's used on regional aircraft that are not too big. http://www.aviationpros.com/product/10025602/avtron-manufacturing-inc-dash-60-upgrade-kit http://www.aviationpros.com/product/10025541/avtron-manufacturing-inc-testing-equipment PS: Sorry for throwing this thread off topic. I did not intend to turn this into a class covering the FARs. Eve Online Invite https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=ed64524f-15ca-4997-ab92-eaae0af74b7f&action=buddy
Stefan Stahl Seituoda Taskforce Command 1167	Posted - 2015.05.10 08:57:00 - [34] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP put new content and balancing on hold for a month or two to work solely on nothing but bug fixes? I would extend this to "polish". Polish contains bug fixes, but also minor design changes to existing features. Some stuff I find relevant: - The charge level of weapons is being displayed in the wrong place (bottom right) instead of center, where you'd need it. - There is no visual feedback when you're being repaired. - The bandwidth feature is still in early development stage. How much bandwidth am I using right now? - When trying to enter a vehicle but all seats are taken this isn't shown visually and the user is left to speculate (maybe lag?). - The match start procedure is still the same as back when designers thought fights would be multiple hours long by 2014. (Hint: "Deployment starts in 10 ... 9 ... 8" and then everyone spawns at the same time.) - The "Press R1 to see daily missions" button should not be visible on screen all the time. It stopped being a new feature and should go into one of the Neocom tabs. Maybe put a red exclamation mark there after each downtime until the person looked at it. - One of the shaders still goes wonky when being a gunner on a hardened vehicle. The same can be observed while hacking when the left arm is being lit. The bright parts slowly become brighter while the dark parts get darker. - When driving a vehicle you can't see the ammo on your gunners. - The match loading screens don't deliver relevant information. This has irked me since 2013. From my perspective this could help improve NPE significantly within 2 weeks, if somebody finally bothered to do it. (I've seen examples where loading screens even showed small first-person tutorial videos to explain how certain actions work. There's so much space for improvement.) - The aiming mechanics didn't receive a make-over since closed beta. We should at least get the possibility to manipulate sensitivity, non-linearity and deadzones for X and Y direction in the settings - maybe under an "advanced settings" tab. - I could go on. The gist of it is that Dust really needs some polish.
CommanderBolt KILL-EM-QUICK Rise Of Legion. 3483	Posted - 2015.05.10 12:45:00 - [35] - Quote Agreed +1 Vitantur Nothus wrote: Why hide a solution under frothy pile of derpa? SCV Ready!
Onesimus Tarsus is-a-Corporation 3453	Posted - 2015.05.10 12:55:00 - [36] - Quote Stefan Stahl wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP put new content and balancing on hold for a month or two to work solely on nothing but bug fixes? I would extend this to "polish". Polish contains bug fixes, but also minor design changes to existing features. Some stuff I find relevant: - The charge level of weapons is being displayed in the wrong place (bottom right) instead of center, where you'd need it. - There is no visual feedback when you're being repaired. - The bandwidth feature is still in early development stage. How much bandwidth am I using right now? - When trying to enter a vehicle but all seats are taken this isn't shown visually and the user is left to speculate (maybe lag?). - The match start procedure is still the same as back when designers thought fights would be multiple hours long by 2014. (Hint: "Deployment starts in 10 ... 9 ... 8" and then everyone spawns at the same time.) - The "Press R1 to see daily missions" button should not be visible on screen all the time. It stopped being a new feature and should go into one of the Neocom tabs. Maybe put a red exclamation mark there after each downtime until the person looked at it. - One of the shaders still goes wonky when being a gunner on a hardened vehicle. The same can be observed while hacking when the left arm is being lit. The bright parts slowly become brighter while the dark parts get darker. - When driving a vehicle you can't see the ammo on your gunners. - The match loading screens don't deliver relevant information. This has irked me since 2013. From my perspective this could help improve NPE significantly within 2 weeks, if somebody finally bothered to do it. (I've seen examples where loading screens even showed small first-person tutorial videos to explain how certain actions work. There's so much space for improvement.) - The aiming mechanics didn't receive a make-over since closed beta. We should at least get the possibility to manipulate sensitivity, non-linearity and deadzones for X and Y direction in the settings - maybe under an "advanced settings" tab. - I could go on. The gist of it is that Dust really needs some polish. Great list, and only about half-done. .emag nug ym tpecxe gnihtyreve sexif gnikamhctam RDK
Aeon Amadi Negative-Feedback. Negative-Feedback 10013	Posted - 2015.05.10 13:37:00 - [37] - Quote Maken Tosch wrote: That would be a great idea but there is a problem. The game needs to continue making money and that means Rattati has to maintain a balance between focusing on bug fixes and introducing more content. Let me give you an analogy to better explain why. Pretend that I am an aircraft mechanic working for an airline. A commercial jet rolls into the hangar and is due for an annual inspection. However, since the aircraft is needed in action as often as possible to maintain revenue for the airline and since an aircraft on ground is an aircraft that is NOT making any money, we already filed the necessary paperwork to perform a progressive inspection instead. A progressive inspection is exactly like an annual inspection only it is performed at set intervals (usually every month) over the course of an entire year rather than being performed all at once. On the first month we inspect the wings. The following month we inspect the tail section. The month after that we inspect the landing gear, hydraulic & pneumatic systems, and so on and so forth until the 12th month when finally sign it off as completed and say it's airworthy. In the meantime, the aircraft continues to fly for the airline to make more money. This is preferred over doing the entire inspection process all in one go. Congratulations, you just learned something new that you probably won't even bother to use for the rest of your life unless you're an aircraft mechanic like me. I work at Northrop Grumman. Just thought I'd throw that out there. Sounds like we do things a lot different. You guys are like a broken record with this "CPM material" business xD Let it go
Maken Tosch DUST University Ivy League 11614	Posted - 2015.05.10 15:39:00 - [38] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: Maken Tosch wrote: That would be a great idea but there is a problem. The game needs to continue making money and that means Rattati has to maintain a balance between focusing on bug fixes and introducing more content. Let me give you an analogy to better explain why. Pretend that I am an aircraft mechanic working for an airline. A commercial jet rolls into the hangar and is due for an annual inspection. However, since the aircraft is needed in action as often as possible to maintain revenue for the airline and since an aircraft on ground is an aircraft that is NOT making any money, we already filed the necessary paperwork to perform a progressive inspection instead. A progressive inspection is exactly like an annual inspection only it is performed at set intervals (usually every month) over the course of an entire year rather than being performed all at once. On the first month we inspect the wings. The following month we inspect the tail section. The month after that we inspect the landing gear, hydraulic & pneumatic systems, and so on and so forth until the 12th month when finally sign it off as completed and say it's airworthy. In the meantime, the aircraft continues to fly for the airline to make more money. This is preferred over doing the entire inspection process all in one go. Congratulations, you just learned something new that you probably won't even bother to use for the rest of your life unless you're an aircraft mechanic like me. I work at Northrop Grumman. Just thought I'd throw that out there. Sounds like we do things a lot different. That not surprising to be honest. Airlines, cargo companies, repair stations, and aircraft/engine manufacturers do things differently from each other depending on what's needed of the aircraft and under what Part of the FARs the aircraft operates in. Some places do what I like to call the Alphabet soup of Checks (A Check, B Check, C Check, etc.), some do annual inspections, others do progressive inspections, or some other form that is approved by both the manufacturer and the FAA. By the way, you're lucky to be working for Northrop. That company has a lot of history. Eve Online Invite https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=ed64524f-15ca-4997-ab92-eaae0af74b7f&action=buddy
Soldner VonKuechle SAM-MIK General Tso's Alliance 2314	Posted - 2015.05.10 16:01:00 - [39] - Quote Maken Tosch wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: Maken Tosch wrote: That would be a great idea but there is a problem. The game needs to continue making money and that means Rattati has to maintain a balance between focusing on bug fixes and introducing more content. Let me give you an analogy to better explain why. Pretend that I am an aircraft mechanic working for an airline. A commercial jet rolls into the hangar and is due for an annual inspection. However, since the aircraft is needed in action as often as possible to maintain revenue for the airline and since an aircraft on ground is an aircraft that is NOT making any money, we already filed the necessary paperwork to perform a progressive inspection instead. A progressive inspection is exactly like an annual inspection only it is performed at set intervals (usually every month) over the course of an entire year rather than being performed all at once. On the first month we inspect the wings. The following month we inspect the tail section. The month after that we inspect the landing gear, hydraulic & pneumatic systems, and so on and so forth until the 12th month when finally sign it off as completed and say it's airworthy. In the meantime, the aircraft continues to fly for the airline to make more money. This is preferred over doing the entire inspection process all in one go. Congratulations, you just learned something new that you probably won't even bother to use for the rest of your life unless you're an aircraft mechanic like me. I work at Northrop Grumman. Just thought I'd throw that out there. Sounds like we do things a lot different. That not surprising to be honest. Airlines, cargo companies, repair stations, and aircraft/engine manufacturers do things differently from each other depending on what's needed of the aircraft and under what Part of the FARs the aircraft operates in. Some places do what I like to call the Alphabet soup of Checks (A Check, B Check, C Check, etc.), some do annual inspections, others do progressive inspections, or some other form that is approved by both the manufacturer and the FAA. By the way, you're lucky to be working for Northrop. That company has a lot of history. I fly on a lot of airplanes, does that count? Better netcoding and plugged memory leaks. Last pieces of the broken puzlzle.
Maken Tosch DUST University Ivy League 11618	Posted - 2015.05.10 16:04:00 - [40] - Quote Soldner VonKuechle wrote: I fly on a lot of airplanes, does that count? /not sure if actual pilot or frequent flyer with a lot of miles Eve Online Invite https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=ed64524f-15ca-4997-ab92-eaae0af74b7f&action=buddy

Soldner VonKuechle SAM-MIK General Tso's Alliance 2314	Posted - 2015.05.10 16:07:00 - [41] - Quote Maken Tosch wrote: Soldner VonKuechle wrote: I fly on a lot of airplanes, does that count? /not sure if actual pilot or frequent flyer with a lot of miles the latter. all on the co-ops dime. yay bureaucracy! Better netcoding and plugged memory leaks. Last pieces of the broken puzlzle.
Tech Ohm Eaven Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 1793	Posted - 2015.05.10 21:53:00 - [42] - Quote Maken Tosch wrote: Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Orly? -60 used on what plane? Item was called a DASH sixty I'm just recently certified and I was only using the airline part as an analogy. But a quick search on AviationPros reveals that you're talking about a power unit used for testing things like landing gear retraction or any other part of the aircraft that relies on hydraulic power. Given its design, I would probably say it's used on regional aircraft that are not too big. http://www.aviationpros.com/product/10025602/avtron-manufacturing-inc-dash-60-upgrade-kit http://www.aviationpros.com/product/10025541/avtron-manufacturing-inc-testing-equipment PS: Sorry for throwing this thread off topic. I did not intend to turn this into a class covering the FARs. back then a dash sixty was a generator powering a blower turbine to startup f4 jet engines but sometimes the dash sixty was over rpm and the turbine flew past the f4 jet cockpit._._.Scary times
Flaylock Steve Nos Nothi 875	Posted - 2015.05.10 23:15:00 - [43] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP put new content and balancing on hold for a month or two to work solely on nothing but bug fixes? I usually don't like you, but I agree with your post. +1 and respect! (jk on the not liking you part, don't really know you, just know a lot of people don't like you, oh well xD)
Aeon Amadi Negative-Feedback. Negative-Feedback 10035	Posted - 2015.05.11 00:46:00 - [44] - Quote Flaylock Steve wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP put new content and balancing on hold for a month or two to work solely on nothing but bug fixes? I usually don't like you, but I agree with your post. +1 and respect! (jk on the not liking you part, don't really know you, just know a lot of people don't like you, oh well xD) I'm just misunderstood. Jk, I revel in the fact that people hate me. More people know who ****** is than Edward Snowden, afterall. EDIT: See? Even the forums censors out Punchler. You guys are like a broken record with this "CPM material" business xD Let it go
KalOfTheRathi Nec Tributis 1506	Posted - 2015.05.11 01:10:00 - [45] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP put new content and balancing on hold for a month or two to work solely on nothing but bug fixes? Aeon, the bug focus would be difficult to honor. The current bug count is massive and a few months would scarcely scratch the surface. There are bugs that I have documented, analyzed and suggested possible methods to solve that are beyond any programmer working at CCP. The skill level is simply not there. Indeed, one suspects the level of skill has never been in attendance. Additionally there are a list of problems that are commonly called bugs but are in truth the reality of the network/server/client architecture that CCP/Iceland has foisted upon CCP/Shanghai. That is not to mention the limitations of the PS3 itself, or upper management's decision to save money by not upgrading past Unreal Engine 3+. They have modified an underperforming game engine that the industry has gladly left behind and are loathe to spend real world cash on a fix. Indeed, as UE4 has yet to be released to PS3 the simplest path isn't even possible and truth be told wasn't all that simple a change as UE4 is a dramatic change. Solving the hit box issues, burdensome graphic detail that is useless in game, educating the players such that they realize the server resolved them getting killed before they got around the corner and the bullet did not actually go through the corner. It was merely displayed as such by their client software. The UI is not acceptable. But this is what we have, should they spend more hours on it or leave it alone? Whether you ask that question to a thousand different subjects the truth is CCP Rattati has the actual responsibility and, for the most part, has served Dust514 players better than they were served previously. I do have significant disagreement with some of his decisions, but I am not his manager nor does he gives a rat's behind about my preferences. If we had a dozen bugs that were well known, prioritized correctly (as in agreement which is impossible by the very nature of these forums) then I would say go for it. However, the bugs are in the hundreds. Two additional programmers, of exceptional quality, would be necessary to add to the staff full time and I don't see that happening. The best course would require addressing the mediocre and unbalanced input device handlers, clarifying the network/server/client relationship so the gamers can get realistic about what is actually happening in game, improving the network communications and a persistent dialing back of the graphic load (getting rid of the stupid moods would be great). Of course, as a player that tanks more than anything else fixing the horrendous problems with the turrets would be high on my list. Please post again when you have a bug list that you propose they focus on. My favorite tank is a Lightning. Just sayin.
Aeon Amadi Negative-Feedback. Negative-Feedback 10038	Posted - 2015.05.11 01:13:00 - [46] - Quote KalOfTheRathi wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP put new content and balancing on hold for a month or two to work solely on nothing but bug fixes? Please post again when you have a bug list that you propose they focus on. -Blinks. Looks up at the stickied thread on GD. Looks back at this thread. Decides it's best just to let this one go.- You guys are like a broken record with this "CPM material" business xD Let it go
Mobius Wyvern Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 6331	Posted - 2015.05.11 03:16:00 - [47] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP put new content and balancing on hold for a month or two to work solely on nothing but bug fixes? As long as it's only a month. SOE did that to Planetside 2 for almost a year and it just about killed the game. Amidst the blue skies A link from past to future The sheltering wings of the protector
Jack the Rlpper TRAILS AND TRIBULATIONS 183	Posted - 2015.05.11 04:23:00 - [48] - Quote Happy. (Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ. LASERS BTCH!!!!!! The Incursions are back... and they're golden baby!


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

SCV Ready!