DUST Search - Destiny Bans "toxic" players.....

All Channels

General Discussions

Destiny Bans "toxic" players.....

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
ROTFL Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 8	Posted - 2015.04.03 03:55:00 - [1] - Quote http://news.yahoo.com/bungie-bans-toxic-players-destiny-011139913.html;_ylt=A0LEVzrBDh5VpDIAzyVXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTByMjB0aG5zBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw-- Anybody who leaves a match in Dust is TOXIC and must be dealt with!
Xocoyol Zaraoul Superior Genetics 3734	Posted - 2015.04.03 03:58:00 - [2] - Quote Lol you get your news from Yahoo. "You see those red dots over there? Go and shoot them until you see a +50 on the screen" - Arkena Wyrnspire
gustavo acosta Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention 1106	Posted - 2015.04.03 04:29:00 - [3] - Quote loldestiny GimmeDatSuhWeet isk We found a new pope to teach shield users how to shield tank, all hail pope redblood the 6th
JIMvc2 Consolidated Dust 850	Posted - 2015.04.03 04:47:00 - [4] - Quote Its the game that lasted only 1 day. Yet Bungie calls it a "mmo" more like a cash grab (Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ. LASERS BTCH!!!!!! Die YOU SHADOW BEING IN THE DARK!!!
Fizzer XCIV Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire 2894	Posted - 2015.04.03 05:04:00 - [5] - Quote JIMvc2 wrote: Its the game that lasted only 1 day. Yet Bungie calls it a "mmo" more like a cash grab I held out hope until the first DLC, which I beat in little more than 1-+ hours. I thought the base game was going to be somewhat bare, and that they would have huge expansions with the DLC to pace the game better for the whole community. I was wrong... The reality is that they don't have much content at all for the entire game, and so they decided to spread it out thinly and sell tiny bits for rediculous prices. The very though that people had to pay $15 dollars for 90 minutes of what is, to be honest, average gameplay, horrifies me... This is coming from someone who would gladly pay $60 for Journey, and that game only lasts 2 hours at most. The best 2 hours of gamepley to have ever been crafted, IMO, but still. Quality is more important, but if you don't have quality... Home at Last <3
Apocalyptic Destroyer L.O.T.I.S. 398	Posted - 2015.04.03 05:04:00 - [6] - Quote CCP should take notes... True Amarr In Disguise Pain is weakness leaving the body Proto : ADS Pilot Ak.0 : Mando, Scout, Assault
Avallo Kantor 590	Posted - 2015.04.03 05:06:00 - [7] - Quote Fizzer XCIV wrote: JIMvc2 wrote: Its the game that lasted only 1 day. Yet Bungie calls it a "mmo" more like a cash grab I held out hope until the first DLC, which I beat in little more than 1-+ hours. I thought the base game was going to be somewhat bare, and that they would have huge expansions with the DLC to pace the game better for the whole community. I was wrong... The reality is that they don't have much content at all for the entire game, and so they decided to spread it out thinly and sell tiny bits for rediculous prices. The very though that people had to pay $15 dollars for 90 minutes of what is, to be honest, average gameplay, horrifies me... This is coming from someone who would gladly pay $60 for Journey, and that game only lasts 2 hours at most. The best 2 hours of gamepley to have ever been crafted, IMO, but still. Quality is more important, but if you don't have quality... Yeah, a lot of people get caught up on how long a game lasts, but imo it's all about the experience. A game that can be amazing for 1 hour is far better than 5 hours of padding in game. That said, a game that's mediocre AND Short like certain order games... that's just a double dose of terrible.
xTheSiLLyRaBBiTx Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 473	Posted - 2015.04.03 05:17:00 - [8] - Quote ROTFL wrote: http://news.yahoo.com/bungie-bans-toxic-players-destiny-011139913.html;_ylt=A0LEVzrBDh5VpDIAzyVXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTByMjB0aG5zBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw-- Anybody who leaves a match in Dust is TOXIC and must be dealt with! Lol, we'll need a larger player base before those kinds of bans will happen. *\|LOGi GOD\|* Director of Fatal Absolution
gustavo acosta Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention 1106	Posted - 2015.04.03 05:26:00 - [9] - Quote xTheSiLLyRaBBiTx wrote: ROTFL wrote: http://news.yahoo.com/bungie-bans-toxic-players-destiny-011139913.html;_ylt=A0LEVzrBDh5VpDIAzyVXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTByMjB0aG5zBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw-- Anybody who leaves a match in Dust is TOXIC and must be dealt with! Lol, we'll need a larger player base before those kinds of bans will happen. Ayy you see them boosters I reported a couple months back? Neither do I .... GimmeDatSuhWeet isk We found a new pope to teach shield users how to shield tank, all hail pope redblood the 6th
Petrified Ancient Tree Kinsho Swords Caldari State 38	Posted - 2015.04.03 05:43:00 - [10] - Quote ROTFL wrote: http://news.yahoo.com/bungie-bans-toxic-players-destiny-011139913.html;_ylt=A0LEVzrBDh5VpDIAzyVXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTByMjB0aG5zBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw-- Anybody who leaves a match in Dust is TOXIC and must be dealt with! You mean anybody who stands around idle for most of the match. That does more harm than someone who leaves but can be replaced by a real player. And of course sometimes the drop from the game is not because of the player - server funkiness, ISP funkiness, Wife Aggro... But sitting around in a match and not contributing? Oh yeah: They don't earn SP because of the new rules. Petrified Ancient Tree - me, of course. Urgtz Ciao'Main - My son Joanne Shelton - My Daughter

DeadlyAztec11 Defenders of the Helghast Dream 7999	Posted - 2015.04.03 05:47:00 - [11] - Quote Your news outlet is named Yahoo!: your argument is therefore invalid. Put your flags up in the sky. And wave them side to side. Show the world where you're from. Show the world we are one.
VAHZZ 1182	Posted - 2015.04.03 06:32:00 - [12] - Quote Wait a fudging minute here. Is no one shocked that people play destiny? I though that was a damn myth parents tell kids to scare them....you know, like the boogyman or Santa and krampas. *BRUH.* Closed Beta Vet

CCP Rattati C C P C C P Alliance 19655	Posted - 2015.04.03 07:24:00 - [13] - Quote Players that keep harassing the academy by recreating new characters will be banned, if I get my way. And I usually do. "As well as stupid, Rattati is incredibly slow and accident-prone, and cannot even swim"

gustavo acosta Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention 1106	Posted - 2015.04.03 07:27:00 - [14] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Players that keep harassing the academy by recreating new characters will be banned, if I get my way. And I usually do. dayum son #triggerhappy #banhammercrush #vetstriedtodefeatthematchmakingbuttheyfailedastheywerestrickendowntotheground GimmeDatSuhWeet isk We found a new pope to teach shield users how to shield tank, all hail pope redblood the 6th
MINA Longstrike Kirjuun Heiian 2451	Posted - 2015.04.03 07:33:00 - [15] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Players that keep harassing the academy by recreating new characters will be banned, if I get my way. And I usually do. Shouldn't be hard to get your way, Eve already bans people for **ing with players in the starter systems through any of the various methods available. The precedent is set, swing that damn hammer. Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.** I have a few alts.
Jonny D Buelle Mors Effera 875	Posted - 2015.04.03 07:55:00 - [16] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Players that keep harassing the academy by recreating new characters will be banned, if I get my way. And I usually do. Out of curiosity, if I was to make a new toon so I could have an Amarr alt would I be in danger if being banned? I find your lack of heaviness... disturbing...
duster 35000 Algintal Core Gallente Federation 470	Posted - 2015.04.03 08:15:00 - [17] - Quote Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: Lol you get your news from Yahoo. Kek. Destiny, kek. Molestia approved
bathtubist TRUE SAVAGES Learning Alliance 75	Posted - 2015.04.03 09:23:00 - [18] - Quote ROTFL wrote: http://news.yahoo.com/bungie-bans-toxic-players-destiny-011139913.html;_ylt=A0LEVzrBDh5VpDIAzyVXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTByMjB0aG5zBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw-- Anybody who leaves a match in Dust is TOXIC and must be dealt with! good for destiny still a let down tho
MINA Longstrike Kirjuun Heiian 2454	Posted - 2015.04.03 09:41:00 - [19] - Quote Jonny D Buelle wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Players that keep harassing the academy by recreating new characters will be banned, if I get my way. And I usually do. Out of curiosity, if I was to make a new toon so I could have an Amarr alt would I be in danger if being banned? If it was demonstrated to be highly repeated behaviour done largely to grind new players faces into the dirt? Yeah. If its just a new account and you're not there simply to destroy people, probably not. Whenever I went back through battle academy I always made sure that I tried to make someone's experience better by teaching them something like a proper suit fitting. Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian. I have a few alts.
Mad Syringe ReDust Inc. 754	Posted - 2015.04.03 09:55:00 - [20] - Quote MINA Longstrike wrote: Jonny D Buelle wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Players that keep harassing the academy by recreating new characters will be banned, if I get my way. And I usually do. Out of curiosity, if I was to make a new toon so I could have an Amarr alt would I be in danger if being banned? If it was demonstrated to be highly repeated behaviour done largely to grind new players faces into the dirt? Yeah. If its just a new account and you're not there simply to destroy people, probably not. Whenever I went back through battle academy I always made sure that I tried to make someone's experience better by teaching them something like a proper suit fitting. Rats problem is people constantly creating and biomassing alts, just to harass noobs in the academy. Which is obviously pathetic, and those lowlifers should be banned.

steadyhand amarr shadows of 514 3679	Posted - 2015.04.03 12:36:00 - [21] - Quote Jonny D Buelle wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Players that keep harassing the academy by recreating new characters will be banned, if I get my way. And I usually do. Out of curiosity, if I was to make a new toon so I could have an Amarr alt would I be in danger if being banned? one character no, 3 characters still no (normall alt ammount) 10-20-30 characters yes i think its right you shoul be banned, and yes their are players that are doing this constantly, its very easy to spot. repeat afking should also be banable im glad the industry is starting to tackle toxic players in their games long over due. You can never have to many chaples -Templar True adamance
Aeon Amadi Ahrendee Inc. Negative-Feedback 9441	Posted - 2015.04.03 17:19:00 - [22] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Players that keep harassing the academy by recreating new characters will be banned, if I get my way. And I usually do. Do it! Have a suggestion for the Planetary Services Department? *Founder of AIV*
Xocoyol Zaraoul Superior Genetics 3748	Posted - 2015.04.04 19:26:00 - [23] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Players that keep harassing the academy by recreating new characters will be banned, if I get my way. And I usually do. Hey, woah there. Stop. Hammertime. How about then you create an option where if your main is *Veteran* then your alts are placed in normal matchmaking and not academy? I like to creat alts every now and then to try some hairbrained thing, so my SP on my main is saved unless I really like the "thing." I did this for PLCs, made an PLC alt, messed with it for a week, then decided yes this is fun and voila my main invested the SP into it, then deleted my alt. "You see those red dots over there? Go and shoot them until you see a +50 on the screen" - Arkena Wyrnspire
steadyhand amarr shadows of 514 3680	Posted - 2015.04.04 19:38:00 - [24] - Quote xocoyol, you would not stand out as smashing newbs, its the people who constantly make alts to cycle into the academy, 1 to 3 a month fine, its the 20-30 people are doing thats the problem You can never have to many chaples -Templar True adamance
Knight Soiaire Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 5961	Posted - 2015.04.04 19:38:00 - [25] - Quote Those players that go around stomping academy newbs make it difficult to find players for a farm corp. A damn shame.
One Eyed King Nos Nothi 9063	Posted - 2015.04.04 19:50:00 - [26] - Quote Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Players that keep harassing the academy by recreating new characters will be banned, if I get my way. And I usually do. Hey, woah there. Stop. Hammertime. How about then you create an option where if your main is *Veteran* then your alts are placed in normal matchmaking and not academy? I like to creat alts every now and then to try some hairbrained thing, so my SP on my main is saved unless I really like the "thing." I did this for PLCs, made an PLC alt, messed with it for a week, then decided yes this is fun and voila my main invested the SP into it, then deleted my alt. But that is different than repeatedly having an alt on the biomass timer with an alt that is running through the academy ad nauseam. I wouldn't mind if those accounts were banned. Former CEO of the Land of the BIind. Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

GimmeDatSuhWeet isk

GimmeDatSuhWeet isk

GimmeDatSuhWeet isk