| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
2993
   |
Posted - 2015.03.24 03:28:00 -
[31] - Quote
Tread Loudly 2 wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Tread Loudly 2 wrote:As far as Officer HAV's go I would be happy with any of a few things being the "upgrade"
1st +1 small turret
2nd Higher PG/CPU by about 5-10%
3rd The ability to not die over going over bumps in a road
4th The ability to not fall under the map, whilst checking the map
5th The ability to keep it grounded rather than flying into outer space after hitting an invisible pebble
6th The ability to use rails properly without any random issues with overheating in a tense situation
Lastly 7th Their being a complete balance between the two hulls (armor and Shield)
Any of these or a combo of these would be greatly appreciated o/
3-6 should just be a buff  Shhhh I know... I was just saying that so hopefully they'd finally get fixed 
I know 
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
17823
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 03:35:00 -
[32] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:True Adamance wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:True Adamance wrote:Um.....wait really?
No I just won't take this seriously. Some pilot you are. So you base a pilot on how unreasonable they can be? Top lel Hold me back Godin! Hold me back! I'm sorry, but I watch fights, not stop them. Which reminds me. Sumo fights are funny. They are strong though.
Yeah they are. Last Christmas Party at work the bosses hired out Sumo suits and got a drunken Operations Manager and Maintenance Manager to have a fantastic fight to the death.
Glorious!
Raphael: I'm warning you. Do not leave me here. I will find you.
Castiel: Maybe one day. Today you're my little bitch
|
anaboop
Ahrendee Inc.
Negative-Feedback
163
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 03:51:00 -
[33] - Quote
Its possible to fit 4 complex repairs on maddy for 580 armor reps, but gimped everywyere else
Fully sick Anaboop trading card
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3123
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 04:21:00 -
[34] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:True Adamance wrote:Um.....wait really?
No I just won't take this seriously. Some pilot you are. So you base a pilot on how unreasonable they can be? Top lel
Essentially someone claiming they're a pilot not at all liking the idea of officer hulls/turrets. That would be like someone that only plays scout saying "officer scouts are a terrible idea."
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Racro 01 Arifistan
Simple Minded People Pty. Ltd.
522
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 06:49:00 -
[35] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:DarthJT5 wrote:True Adamance wrote:Um.....wait really?
No I just won't take this seriously. Why not? Infantry/vehicle parity FTW right? Okay so I'm not against Officer Vehicles....what I take issue with is blatant and unapologized insanity. Base 180 Repairs per second plus 5x Low Slot Modules and the PG/CPU allotments to adequately fit said vehicle.... That is beyond the bounds of reasonable. 180 +137.5+137.5+ 137.5 = 592.5 Repairs per second..... even if you only ran 2x Prototype Heavy Repairers that would amount to 455 repairs per second with likely either 2x Armour Hardeners. This would quite literally be a game breaking vehicle.
I don't think 3 blaster tanks running complex blaster/ heat sinks coujld break that rep rate.
accounbting for said tanks own fitting capabiltys/ ability to return the same fire....just much greater.
defently game breaking....far ahead of having to be overpowered like the officer suits. at least they don't break the game.
Elite Gallenten Soldier
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
17836
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 07:24:00 -
[36] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:True Adamance wrote:Um.....wait really?
No I just won't take this seriously. Some pilot you are. So you base a pilot on how unreasonable they can be? Top lel Essentially someone claiming they're a pilot not at all liking the idea of officer hulls/turrets. That would be like someone that only plays scout saying "officer scouts are a terrible idea."
It's not that they are a bad idea it's that they have to be approached carefully.
Raphael: I'm warning you. Do not leave me here. I will find you.
Castiel: Maybe one day. Today you're my little bitch
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
5575
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 08:26:00 -
[37] - Quote
The idea of officer vehicles is a good one, not entire sure if I agree with your exact numbers, but the concept itself is sound. Infantry have it for suits and weapons, so the same treatment for vehicles is reasonable as well.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast
www.biomassed.net
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star.
4383
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 10:55:00 -
[38] - Quote
So pilots don't want an OP HAV even if it is rarely dropped?
What is wrong with you? Vehicles still suck and it doesn't look like it will get any better anytime soon.
Disclaimer:
The above post is respectful, contains no ranting, contains no personal attacks, contains no trolling, contains no racism, contains no discrimination, contains no profanity, contains no spamming. This post is an opinion and is related to DUST514
CCP Rattati - "One giant vehicle nerf with more power to AV", you have got to be kidding...''
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3123
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 15:30:00 -
[39] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:True Adamance wrote:Um.....wait really?
No I just won't take this seriously. Some pilot you are. So you base a pilot on how unreasonable they can be? Top lel Essentially someone claiming they're a pilot not at all liking the idea of officer hulls/turrets. That would be like someone that only plays scout saying "officer scouts are a terrible idea." It's not that they are a bad idea it's that they have to be approached carefully.
Not sure how "careful" adding a light slot to a sentinel is, or a 5th low slot and 3rd equipment slot to a scout is.
Officer suits are pretty OP, and nigh-unkillable in the right hands, no reason the same shouldn't apply to an officer tank driven by a pilot with a boatload of experience.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3123
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 15:31:00 -
[40] - Quote
Racro 01 Arifistan wrote:True Adamance wrote:DarthJT5 wrote:True Adamance wrote:Um.....wait really?
No I just won't take this seriously. Why not? Infantry/vehicle parity FTW right? Okay so I'm not against Officer Vehicles....what I take issue with is blatant and unapologized insanity. Base 180 Repairs per second plus 5x Low Slot Modules and the PG/CPU allotments to adequately fit said vehicle.... That is beyond the bounds of reasonable. 180 +137.5+137.5+ 137.5 = 592.5 Repairs per second..... even if you only ran 2x Prototype Heavy Repairers that would amount to 455 repairs per second with likely either 2x Armour Hardeners. This would quite literally be a game breaking vehicle. I don't think 3 blaster tanks running complex blaster/ heat sinks coujld break that rep rate. accounbting for said tanks own fitting capabiltys/ ability to return the same fire....just much greater. defently game breaking....far ahead of having to be overpowered like the officer suits. at least they don't break the game.
Two rails would tear it apart.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
|
|
Tread Loudly 2
Ametat Security
Amarr Empire
110
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 16:19:00 -
[41] - Quote
As said before. I'd much rather have the current issues (both balancing, fitting and in-game bugs) fixed before we worry about adding in new vehicles as they wouldn't be in a better state than the current one's if they haven't been fixed yet.
I Like Tanks, Nova Knives and MagSec SMG's.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3123
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 16:47:00 -
[42] - Quote
Tread Loudly 2 wrote:As said before. I'd much rather have the current issues (both balancing, fitting and in-game bugs) fixed before we worry about adding in new vehicles as they wouldn't be in a better state than the current one's if they haven't been fixed yet.
Yeah the railguns failing to fire, firing late, firing without you pulling the trigger until it overheats.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
2996
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 23:20:00 -
[43] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:True Adamance wrote:Um.....wait really?
No I just won't take this seriously. Some pilot you are. So you base a pilot on how unreasonable they can be? Top lel Essentially someone claiming they're a pilot not at all liking the idea of officer hulls/turrets. That would be like someone that only plays scout saying "officer scouts are a terrible idea."
That is false, considering not a single pilot here has said that. We've specifically said that YOUR idea is unreasonable as all ****. Manuke.
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3125
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 23:48:00 -
[44] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:True Adamance wrote:Um.....wait really?
No I just won't take this seriously. Some pilot you are. So you base a pilot on how unreasonable they can be? Top lel Essentially someone claiming they're a pilot not at all liking the idea of officer hulls/turrets. That would be like someone that only plays scout saying "officer scouts are a terrible idea." That is false, considering not a single pilot here has said that. We've specifically said that YOUR idea is unreasonable as all ****. Manuke.
Why is it unreasonable? Because I want an officer tank to be an officer tank, like officer suits are superior to regular PRO suits?
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
2996
|
Posted - 2015.03.25 02:17:00 -
[45] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:
Why is it unreasonable? Because I want an officer tank to be an officer tank, like officer suits are superior to regular PRO suits?
Officer suits are still reasonably killable. These aren't.
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3125
|
Posted - 2015.03.25 02:21:00 -
[46] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
Why is it unreasonable? Because I want an officer tank to be an officer tank, like officer suits are superior to regular PRO suits?
Officer suits are still reasonably killable. These aren't.
So then maybe 2980 armor and an extra 25 reps a second is more reasonable.
Are you still complaining about tanks running damage mods when you get blown up?
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |