DUST Search - The "Last District Rule" Replaces PFC

All Channels

The War Room

The "Last District Rule" Replaces PFC

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Hawkin P Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 501	Posted - 2014.11.16 01:20:00 - [1] - Quote So I have listened to some of your comments. I have talked with ROFL leadership and we decided scrap PFC as it was. Instead we are going to replace it with the "Last District Rule." The means if you are a legit corp that can field at least 12 of their own players, if someone takes your last district, it will be returned to you. (FARMING ONLY CORPS DON'T QUALIFY) If you need a district and your corp can field a full 16 man team of corpmates, contact me and I will still get you a district. This is much easier to manage and there is no reason to take someones last district. This will be enforced by both ROFL and General TSO's.
Hakyou Brutor Capital Acquisitions LLC 1603	Posted - 2014.11.16 01:42:00 - [2] - Quote Rules are flawed. If the corp has one district left as soon as they get their second district they will be "camped," giving them no ability to grow. Knight Soiaire = my bae
Atiim Heaven's Lost Property 13750	Posted - 2014.11.16 01:46:00 - [3] - Quote Hawkin P wrote: [...] The means if you are a legit corp that can field at least 12 of their own players, if someone takes your last district, it will be returned to you. (FARMING ONLY CORPS DON'T QUALIFY) So now the risk of participating in Planetary Conquest is being removed? The 1st Matari Commando -HAND
Hawkin P Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 501	Posted - 2014.11.16 01:57:00 - [4] - Quote Hakyou Brutor wrote: Rules are flawed. If the corp has one district left as soon as they get their second district they will be "camped," giving them no ability to grow. Still better than it is now
Hawkin P Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 501	Posted - 2014.11.16 02:01:00 - [5] - Quote Atiim wrote: Hawkin P wrote: [...] The means if you are a legit corp that can field at least 12 of their own players, if someone takes your last district, it will be returned to you. (FARMING ONLY CORPS DON'T QUALIFY) So now the risk of participating in Planetary Conquest is being removed? No you can lose all your districts but your last one. Everytime you fight you are gambling all the suits you lose on the hope you will win. If you lose your corp is out 10-20mil in suits.
A-P-P-Baby KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 194	Posted - 2014.11.16 02:17:00 - [6] - Quote In opposition to all the negative Nancy's out there just trying to **** on anything they didn't think of, I commend you Hawkin for attempting to make other people's time on dust fun. They call me "Mr. Vacation"... I used to be relevant, but I learned to delegate so I could island hop
Hakyou Brutor Capital Acquisitions LLC 1603	Posted - 2014.11.16 02:23:00 - [7] - Quote Hawkin P wrote: Hakyou Brutor wrote: Rules are flawed. If the corp has one district left as soon as they get their second district they will be "camped," giving them no ability to grow. The game is flawed this solution is still much better than what we have now. If you have a better suggestion by all means speak up. Confine the "top" corps to a system and let the rest be PFC? Just a thought. Knight Soiaire = my bae
Dust User KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1065	Posted - 2014.11.16 02:31:00 - [8] - Quote A-P-P-Baby wrote: In opposition to all the negative Nancy's out there just trying to **** on anything they didn't think of, I commend you Hawkin for attempting to make other people's time on dust fun. Your lawn chair is getting cold.
Derrith Erador Fatal Absolution 3005	Posted - 2014.11.16 02:45:00 - [9] - Quote Hakyou Brutor wrote: Hawkin P wrote: Hakyou Brutor wrote: Rules are flawed. If the corp has one district left as soon as they get their second district they will be "camped," giving them no ability to grow. The game is flawed this solution is still much better than what we have now. If you have a better suggestion by all means speak up. Confine the "top" corps to a system and let the rest be PFC? Just a thought. uhhhhhhh... no? Let me rephrase that. Not just no, but HELL NO. R&B gets more kinky with every album Still rocking ADS
A-P-P-Baby KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 195	Posted - 2014.11.16 03:04:00 - [10] - Quote Dust User wrote: A-P-P-Baby wrote: In opposition to all the negative Nancy's out there just trying to **** on anything they didn't think of, I commend you Hawkin for attempting to make other people's time on dust fun. Your lawn chair is getting cold. I packed away in the shed. Really cold They call me "Mr. Vacation"... I used to be relevant, but I learned to delegate so I could island hop

Hawkin P Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 502	Posted - 2014.11.16 03:59:00 - [11] - Quote Hakyou Brutor wrote: Hawkin P wrote: Hakyou Brutor wrote: Rules are flawed. If the corp has one district left as soon as they get their second district they will be "camped," giving them no ability to grow. The game is flawed this solution is still much better than what we have now. If you have a better suggestion by all means speak up. Confine the "top" corps to a system and let the rest be PFC? Just a thought. The point is Clone packs are so expensive, no corps should ever have to spend 50mil on a useless clone pack. I mean it's just a waste of ISK you could be spending on quafe and exoctic dancers.
gustavo acosta Capital Acquisitions LLC General Tso's Alliance 393	Posted - 2014.11.16 05:25:00 - [12] - Quote Hawkin P wrote: Hakyou Brutor wrote: Hawkin P wrote: Hakyou Brutor wrote: Rules are flawed. If the corp has one district left as soon as they get their second district they will be "camped," giving them no ability to grow. The game is flawed this solution is still much better than what we have now. If you have a better suggestion by all means speak up. Confine the "top" corps to a system and let the rest be PFC? Just a thought. The point is Clone packs are so expensive, no corps should ever have to spend 50mil on a useless clone pack. I mean it's just a waste of ISK you could be spending on quafe and exoctic dancers. If we're being this socialistic to the point of allowing corps. to remain in an environment in which they cannot grow/thrive as a team why not just tax farming districts x amount of isk to donate to smaller/lesser known corps. who want to be in PC... I mean I'm not against socialism, but to create a pool of well oiled dedicated new players to compete against other corps in PC we can't just spoon feed them half-way we have to spoon feed them all the way, or until there is enough competitiveness in new corps. to actually have competition in PC again. Why? Because of how PC is played, versus how an idealist would assume it would be played. (i.e. PC being a nice competitive mode in which two corps. vie for control of match with varying playstyles and tactics)In reality it's all about which corp. can slay/spam better than the enemy. In that respect pubs are more attractive than PC. Other than farming isk, and bragging rights(if that). PC is very unattractive, either the mechanics need to change, or corps. in PC have to make it seem attractive enough for other players to want to play. Just a thought... Edit:I forgot to include the PC training programs that would have to be put in place to show corps that "this is how the enemy will play and the only way for you to win is to do the exact same thing but slightly better." Gallente scout, heavy, logi, and assault Eternal Can I haz ur isk?
Izlare Lenix Vengeance Unbound RISE of LEGION 1126	Posted - 2014.11.16 05:31:00 - [13] - Quote This idea isn't perfect but at least it is something. Trying to help more smaller corps get into PC is still better than only the top corps controlling everything. Gun control is not about guns...it's about control. The only way to ensure freedom is by having the means to defend it.
Marlin Kirby KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 503	Posted - 2014.11.16 07:41:00 - [14] - Quote A-P-P-Baby wrote: Dust User wrote: A-P-P-Baby wrote: In opposition to all the negative Nancy's out there just trying to **** on anything they didn't think of, I commend you Hawkin for attempting to make other people's time on dust fun. Your lawn chair is getting cold. I packed it away in the shed today. Really cold You're a wimpy Canadian. The not Logic Bomb! lollaserfocusedonPS3 Got to get those pub stomps over hours yo!
CUSE TOWN333 KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1882	Posted - 2014.11.16 08:20:00 - [15] - Quote this seems like a better idea then PFC at this point. its much more easy to enforce this with everyone on the same page. many vets have had there fill of PCs and would like to move on to different games and the PS4. any extra districts i take will be given to new corps. all the vet corps don't really need this many districts. i am in the process of giveing 1 UP there district back because i was not aware it was there last one when i flipped it. i also would like to get back to just training with vet corps and use our new guys at some point. we have all fought long and hard on dust and i see its a time to get more people involved in the PC experience. KEQ diplomat/ intel /GC officer
Zombie Supreme Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 172	Posted - 2014.11.16 08:49:00 - [16] - Quote gustavo acosta wrote: If we're being this socialistic to the point of allowing corps. to remain in an environment in which they cannot grow/thrive as a team why not just tax farming districts x amount of isk to donate to smaller/lesser known corps. who want to be in PC... I mean I'm not against socialism, but to create a pool of well oiled dedicated new players to compete against other corps in PC we can't just spoon feed them half-way we have to spoon feed them all the way, or until there is enough competitiveness in new corps. to actually have competition in PC again. Why? Because of how PC is played, versus how an idealist would assume it would be played. (i.e. PC being a nice competitive mode in which two corps. vie for control of match with varying playstyles and tactics)In reality it's all about which corp. can slay/spam better than the enemy. In that respect pubs are more attractive than PC. Other than farming isk, and bragging rights(if that). PC is very unattractive, either the mechanics need to change, or corps. in PC have to make it seem attractive enough for other players to want to play. Just a thought... Edit:I forgot to include the PC training programs that would have to be put in place to show corps that "this is how the enemy will play and the only way for you to win is to do the exact same thing but slightly better."but I think that's being covered already... WHY do people feel the need to write a novel? Lets face it if FA, CA, & KEQ wanted to team up and go DNS 2.0 they could. They aren't. They are trying to make this game alive again. We have to work with what we have. Not some fantasy of a perfect game we will never play. I am tired of people full of criticism that offer no other viable solutions. Molon Labe: Slow and Steady Wins the Race.
D4GG3R Fatal Absolution 513	Posted - 2014.11.16 09:42:00 - [17] - Quote Zombie Supreme wrote: gustavo acosta wrote: If we're being this socialistic to the point of allowing corps. to remain in an environment in which they cannot grow/thrive as a team why not just tax farming districts x amount of isk to donate to smaller/lesser known corps. who want to be in PC... I mean I'm not against socialism, but to create a pool of well oiled dedicated new players to compete against other corps in PC we can't just spoon feed them half-way we have to spoon feed them all the way, or until there is enough competitiveness in new corps. to actually have competition in PC again. Why? Because of how PC is played, versus how an idealist would assume it would be played. (i.e. PC being a nice competitive mode in which two corps. vie for control of match with varying playstyles and tactics)In reality it's all about which corp. can slay/spam better than the enemy. In that respect pubs are more attractive than PC. Other than farming isk, and bragging rights(if that). PC is very unattractive, either the mechanics need to change, or corps. in PC have to make it seem attractive enough for other players to want to play. Just a thought... Edit:I forgot to include the PC training programs that would have to be put in place to show corps that "this is how the enemy will play and the only way for you to win is to do the exact same thing but slightly better."but I think that's being covered already... WHY do people feel the need to write a novel? Lets face it if FA, CA, & KEQ wanted to team up and go DNS 2.0 they could. They aren't. They are trying to make this game alive again. We have to work with what we have. Not some fantasy of a perfect game we will never play. I am tired of people full of criticism that offer no other viable solutions. DNS 2.0? Let's call it something cool, like "Operation D4GG3R" \(^_^)/ I'm pretty plain. I watch anime for the boobs
gustavo acosta Capital Acquisitions LLC General Tso's Alliance 393	Posted - 2014.11.16 21:20:00 - [18] - Quote Zombie Supreme wrote: WHY do people feel the need to write a novel? Lets face it if FA, CA, & KEQ wanted to team up and go DNS 2.0 they could. They aren't. They are trying to make this game alive again. We have to work with what we have. Not some fantasy of a perfect game we will never play. I am tired of people full of criticism that offer no other viable solutions. It was nowhere near the length of a novel. There is no real criticism in what I've written, at least not toward the whole rule of last district, if anything it's a criticism about the PC mechanics. In fact I'm giving viable suggestions to how new/lesser known corps. should be introduced into PC.(you're welcome) I'm surprised you can write when you obviously can't read.(That short enough for you?) Gallente scout, heavy, logi, and assault Eternal Can I haz ur isk?
Hawkin P Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 504	Posted - 2014.11.17 04:20:00 - [19] - Quote gustavo acosta wrote: It was nowhere near the length of a novel. There is no real criticism in what I've written, at least not toward the whole rule of last district, if anything it's a criticism about the PC mechanics. In fact I'm giving viable suggestions to how new/lesser known corps. should be introduced into PC.(you're welcome) That short enough for you? Yes and a bit less preachy. I mean come on you went into a whole tangent about socialism.
CUSE TOWN333 KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1897	Posted - 2014.11.17 05:22:00 - [20] - Quote situation is going well i have a couple corps im giveing districts to. so there will be some new faces on the starmap popping up. and we ask that bloodline stop attacking these small corps as i give them districts. KEQ diplomat/ intel /GC officer

Hawkin P Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 505	Posted - 2014.11.17 06:33:00 - [21] - Quote CUSE TOWN333 wrote: situation is going well i have a couple corps im giveing districts to. so there will be some new faces on the starmap popping up. and we ask that bloodline stop attacking these small corps as i give them districts. I sent a mail to Espeon about it waiting for a response.
Ydubbs81 RND Ahrendee Mercenaries 3452	Posted - 2014.11.17 06:37:00 - [22] - Quote If you guys want more activity....remove all alliances where each corp fends for themselves. > Check RND out here
Zatara Rought Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 4605	Posted - 2014.11.17 07:51:00 - [23] - Quote Ydubbs81 RND wrote: If you guys want more activity....remove all alliances where each corp fends for themselves. Inevitably people who have good working relationships with others would end up being in alliances even if they weren't in alliances. See also: OH/DL/KEQ alliance pre OH leaving the game. B3RT > PFBHz > TEAM > MHPD > IMPS > FA They call me ~Princess Zatata~ Skype: Zatara.Rought Twitter: @ZataraRought
CUSE TOWN333 KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1897	Posted - 2014.11.17 08:49:00 - [24] - Quote Zatara Rought wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: If you guys want more activity....remove all alliances where each corp fends for themselves. Inevitably people who have good working relationships with others would end up being in alliances even if they weren't in alliances. See also: OH/DL/KEQ alliance pre OH leaving the game. that was not called a alliance. it was called the circle of trust. but DL was not in my circle or sipher. as long as you puff puff pass you can sit in the sipher. KEQ diplomat/ intel /GC officer
Ydubbs81 RND Ahrendee Mercenaries 3452	Posted - 2014.11.17 13:22:00 - [25] - Quote Zatara Rought wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: If you guys want more activity....remove all alliances where each corp fends for themselves. Inevitably people who have good working relationships with others would end up being in alliances even if they weren't in alliances. See also: OH/DL/KEQ alliance pre OH leaving the game. True...but opportunity will be there. Some corps may begin to **** each other off and before you know it Concord messages are sent. Not every corp likes every corp in most alliances....unless things have changed, corps tolerate some corps. Hell, all it could take is one player pissing off the right one in a pub. Or, for an ML player to ring vs FA, etc. I know if RND was active, we'd have friends we wouldn't hit but everyone wouldn't get the same courtesy. > Check RND out here
Cavani1EE7 Murphys-Law General Tso's Alliance 508	Posted - 2014.11.17 14:22:00 - [26] - Quote Ydubbs81 RND wrote: If you guys want more activity....remove all alliances where each corp fends for themselves. /signed Take a bow
ER-Bullitt 1650	Posted - 2014.11.17 15:51:00 - [27] - Quote Cavani1EE7 wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: If you guys want more activity....remove all alliances where each corp fends for themselves. /signed Hahahahahaha.... Pretty sure this is exactly what I said to everyone in the EoN donut right after OH joined them and they smashed LoI and took over most of the map. and I got soooo much hate for even mentioning it. I remember hearing this tidbit alot "we didnt create EoN for Dust, we play other games too.. why should we split up so that the other 95% of dust players can participate and have fun in PC? lolnoob, etc etc etc" Good luck. "You insulted my boat. No one insults my boat. It no doubt cost more then the entire village you came from." - Roman837
Marlin Kirby KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 503	Posted - 2014.11.17 15:55:00 - [28] - Quote CUSE TOWN333 wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: If you guys want more activity....remove all alliances where each corp fends for themselves. Inevitably people who have good working relationships with others would end up being in alliances even if they weren't in alliances. See also: OH/DL/KEQ alliance pre OH leaving the game. that was not called a alliance. it was called the circle of trust. but DL was not in my circle or sipher. as long as you puff puff pass you can sit in the sipher. Sphere* The more you know! The not Logic Bomb! lollaserfocusedonPS3 Got to get those pub stomps over hours yo!
Eugene Killmore Red Star. EoN. 439	Posted - 2014.11.17 16:49:00 - [29] - Quote Can I get a district someone? Mail me in game. EoN. #1 alliance of ALL TIME undefeated in bloc warfare ;) Forever repping that Red*Star 666 illuminati thug mafia.
CUSE TOWN333 KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1900	Posted - 2014.11.17 17:48:00 - [30] - Quote Marlin Kirby wrote: CUSE TOWN333 wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: If you guys want more activity....remove all alliances where each corp fends for themselves. Inevitably people who have good working relationships with others would end up being in alliances even if they weren't in alliances. See also: OH/DL/KEQ alliance pre OH leaving the game. that was not called a alliance. it was called the circle of trust. but DL was not in my circle or sipher. as long as you puff puff pass you can sit in the sipher. Sphere* The more you know! if your from the street its called sipher beotch. KEQ diplomat/ intel /GC officer

Dust User KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1067	Posted - 2014.11.17 18:09:00 - [31] - Quote Eugene Killmore wrote: Can I get a district someone? Mail me in game. You know where to find us.
Hawkin P Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 509	Posted - 2014.11.18 02:43:00 - [32] - Quote Eugene Killmore wrote: Can I get a district someone? Mail me in game. I did mail u waiting for you to respond.
Hawkin P Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 509	Posted - 2014.11.18 02:45:00 - [33] - Quote CUSE TOWN333 wrote: if your from the street its called sipher beotch. sipher = sigh - fer lol
Eugene Killmore Red Star. EoN. 439	Posted - 2014.11.20 21:44:00 - [34] - Quote So if a corp gets its only district taken it will be returned? Am I understanding this correctly ? EoN. #1 alliance of ALL TIME undefeated in bloc warfare ;) Forever repping that Red*Star 666 illuminati thug mafia.
Maximus Tarashara Red Star. EoN. 82	Posted - 2014.11.21 00:33:00 - [35] - Quote Eugene Killmore wrote: So if a corp gets its only district taken it will be returned? Am I understanding this correctly ? Yes Bae Also known as the pet shop owner of Red Star.
Atiim Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 13853	Posted - 2014.11.21 14:27:00 - [36] - Quote Hawkin P wrote: Atiim wrote: Hawkin P wrote: [...] The means if you are a legit corp that can field at least 12 of their own players, if someone takes your last district, it will be returned to you. (FARMING ONLY CORPS DON'T QUALIFY) So now the risk of participating in Planetary Conquest is being removed? No you can lose all your districts but your last one. Everytime you fight you are gambling all the suits you lose on the hope you will win. If you lose your corp is out 10-20mil in suits. This keep legit corps from being pushed out of PC, because there are not enough corps in pc. 20mil ISK is pitiful when you split the cost among your team (/16) and have a tax on your corporation. Not only that, but you can easily run crap gear if you know you're going to lose b/c the district will be immediately returned to you. "Legit Corps" don't need that rule as they could easily obtain another district if they get pushed out of PC. The only thing that will be accomplished here is discouraging corp to become "legit", as you're removing the need to be. The 1st Matari Commando -HAND
CUSE TOWN333 KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1918	Posted - 2014.11.21 14:55:00 - [37] - Quote Atiim wrote: Hawkin P wrote: Atiim wrote: Hawkin P wrote: [...] The means if you are a legit corp that can field at least 12 of their own players, if someone takes your last district, it will be returned to you. (FARMING ONLY CORPS DON'T QUALIFY) So now the risk of participating in Planetary Conquest is being removed? No you can lose all your districts but your last one. Everytime you fight you are gambling all the suits you lose on the hope you will win. If you lose your corp is out 10-20mil in suits. This keep legit corps from being pushed out of PC, because there are not enough corps in pc. 20mil ISK is pitiful when you split the cost among your team (/16) and have a tax on your corporation. Not only that, but you can easily run crap gear if you know you're going to lose b/c the district will be immediately returned to you. "Legit Corps" don't need that rule as they could easily obtain another district if they get pushed out of PC. The only thing that will be accomplished here is discouraging corp to become "legit", as you're removing the need to be. don't matter if they get better or fail horrible PC is crap right now with only 4 or 5 corps that put up a fight and the rest pick there bum on weirdO timers. but the last district rule may need to be revised if corps don't fight or use mlt suits or if your corp is a jack4ss you may be removed. KEQ diplomat/ lolromansboat cost more then your whole village
Viktor Hadah Jr Negative-Impact 6070	Posted - 2014.11.21 17:16:00 - [38] - Quote CUSE TOWN333 wrote: Atiim wrote: Hawkin P wrote: Atiim wrote: Hawkin P wrote: [...] The means if you are a legit corp that can field at least 12 of their own players, if someone takes your last district, it will be returned to you. (FARMING ONLY CORPS DON'T QUALIFY) So now the risk of participating in Planetary Conquest is being removed? No you can lose all your districts but your last one. Everytime you fight you are gambling all the suits you lose on the hope you will win. If you lose your corp is out 10-20mil in suits. This keep legit corps from being pushed out of PC, because there are not enough corps in pc. 20mil ISK is pitiful when you split the cost among your team (/16) and have a tax on your corporation. Not only that, but you can easily run crap gear if you know you're going to lose b/c the district will be immediately returned to you. "Legit Corps" don't need that rule as they could easily obtain another district if they get pushed out of PC. The only thing that will be accomplished here is discouraging corp to become "legit", as you're removing the need to be. don't matter if they get better or fail horrible PC is crap right now with only 4 or 5 corps that put up a fight and the rest pick there bum on weirdO timers. but the last district rule may need to be revised if corps don't fight or use mlt suits or if your corp is a jack4ss you may be removed. My corps always being prosecuted... NEG1 Amarr Fw EVE 21 Day Trial Viktor's 3rd Party Services
Ace Boone Capital Acquisitions LLC 389	Posted - 2014.11.23 20:58:00 - [39] - Quote It doesn't require taking the last district to completely demolish a corp's morale. Ask FA, lol, they should know. Only loyal to the republic.
Benjamin Ciscko Fatal Absolution 3499	Posted - 2014.11.23 21:24:00 - [40] - Quote Ace Boone wrote: It doesn't require taking the last district to completely demolish a corp's morale. Ask FA, lol, they should know. lolRamprage Fatal Absolution Director

Derrith Erador Fatal Absolution 3055	Posted - 2014.11.23 22:51:00 - [41] - Quote Ace Boone wrote: It doesn't require taking the last district to completely demolish a corp's morale. Ask FA, lol, they should know. I... just... no... just no. R&B gets more kinky with every album Still rocking ADS
CUSE TOWN333 KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1926	Posted - 2014.11.24 06:29:00 - [42] - Quote Ace Boone wrote: It doesn't require taking the last district to completely demolish a corp's morale. Ask FA, lol, they should know. the most any of us can do is leave corps with at least one district. but as far as peoples feelings getting demoralized thats a tuff one. the reason PFC failed to teach corps is it was to carebear and corps can't grow tuff in that environment. im telling you take the training wheels off and you be surprised at how fast these corps grow and get strong. KEQ diplomat/ lolromansboat cost more then your whole village
Ace Boone Capital Acquisitions LLC 394	Posted - 2014.11.24 06:38:00 - [43] - Quote CUSE TOWN333 wrote: Ace Boone wrote: It doesn't require taking the last district to completely demolish a corp's morale. Ask FA, lol, they should know. the most any of us can do is leave corps with at least one district. but as far as peoples feelings getting demoralized thats a tuff one. the reason PFC failed to teach corps is it was to carebear and corps can't grow tuff in that environment. im telling you take the training wheels off and you be surprised at how fast these corps grow and get strong. When a corp starts losing, a majority of the psuedo-loyal members (tend to be recent good recruits) start to leave, especially in the early stages of a corps creation. I've seen this happen with GAM, PE, Pheonix Federation, MIBO, etc. I think mass attacking or stacking timers is a ***** tactic, unless you're at all-out war with a corp of equal standings. Trying to wipe a corp off the map is just silly, especially when districts are worth nothing. Only loyal to the republic.
CUSE TOWN333 KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1927	Posted - 2014.11.24 07:50:00 - [44] - Quote Ace Boone wrote: CUSE TOWN333 wrote: Ace Boone wrote: It doesn't require taking the last district to completely demolish a corp's morale. Ask FA, lol, they should know. the most any of us can do is leave corps with at least one district. but as far as peoples feelings getting demoralized thats a tuff one. the reason PFC failed to teach corps is it was to carebear and corps can't grow tuff in that environment. im telling you take the training wheels off and you be surprised at how fast these corps grow and get strong. When a corp starts losing, a majority of the psuedo-loyal members (tend to be recent good recruits) start to leave, especially in the early stages of a corps creation. I've seen this happen with GAM, PE, Pheonix Federation, MIBO, etc. I think mass attacking or stacking timers is a ***** tactic, unless you're at all-out war with a corp of equal standings. Trying to wipe a corp off the map is just silly, especially when districts are worth nothing. there is to many corp hoppers in the game for many corporations to succeed anyway. to many crybaby little kids who as soon as they lose its time for them to switch tags and act like nothing happened. KEQ diplomat/ lolromansboat cost more then your whole village
Dust User KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1100	Posted - 2014.11.24 13:55:00 - [45] - Quote CUSE TOWN333 wrote: Ace Boone wrote: CUSE TOWN333 wrote: Ace Boone wrote: It doesn't require taking the last district to completely demolish a corp's morale. Ask FA, lol, they should know. the most any of us can do is leave corps with at least one district. but as far as peoples feelings getting demoralized thats a tuff one. the reason PFC failed to teach corps is it was to carebear and corps can't grow tuff in that environment. im telling you take the training wheels off and you be surprised at how fast these corps grow and get strong. When a corp starts losing, a majority of the psuedo-loyal members (tend to be recent good recruits) start to leave, especially in the early stages of a corps creation. I've seen this happen with GAM, PE, Pheonix Federation, MIBO, etc. I think mass attacking or stacking timers is a ***** tactic, unless you're at all-out war with a corp of equal standings. Trying to wipe a corp off the map is just silly, especially when districts are worth nothing. there is to many corp hoppers in the game for many corporations to succeed anyway. to many crybaby little kids who as soon as they lose its time for them to switch tags and act like nothing happened. It's our fault for giving out participation trophies in tee-ball. These kids just don't know how to lose. If you ain't first, you're last.
james jared Titans of Phoenix 53	Posted - 2014.11.24 16:04:00 - [46] - Quote CUSE TOWN333 wrote: Ace Boone wrote: CUSE TOWN333 wrote: Ace Boone wrote: It doesn't require taking the last district to completely demolish a corp's morale. Ask FA, lol, they should know. the most any of us can do is leave corps with at least one district. but as far as peoples feelings getting demoralized thats a tuff one. the reason PFC failed to teach corps is it was to carebear and corps can't grow tuff in that environment. im telling you take the training wheels off and you be surprised at how fast these corps grow and get strong. When a corp starts losing, a majority of the psuedo-loyal members (tend to be recent good recruits) start to leave, especially in the early stages of a corps creation. I've seen this happen with GAM, PE, Pheonix Federation, MIBO, etc. I think mass attacking or stacking timers is a ***** tactic, unless you're at all-out war with a corp of equal standings. Trying to wipe a corp off the map is just silly, especially when districts are worth nothing. there is to many corp hoppers in the game for many corporations to succeed anyway. to many crybaby little kids who as soon as they lose its time for them to switch tags and act like nothing happened. Yes there r very fue loyal ppl in this game. In a game built on team work ppl think they can just jump over to the winning team. But if u dont know how the ppl u fight with play u can only do so good in PC. True team work can beat a team of good players not working together. I like seeing u guys trying to help get more ppl in PC. Gets boaring fighting the same 4 teams of guys. Keep up the good work guys.
CUSE TOWN333 KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1929	Posted - 2014.11.24 16:58:00 - [47] - Quote james jared wrote: CUSE TOWN333 wrote: Ace Boone wrote: CUSE TOWN333 wrote: Ace Boone wrote: It doesn't require taking the last district to completely demolish a corp's morale. Ask FA, lol, they should know. the most any of us can do is leave corps with at least one district. but as far as peoples feelings getting demoralized thats a tuff one. the reason PFC failed to teach corps is it was to carebear and corps can't grow tuff in that environment. im telling you take the training wheels off and you be surprised at how fast these corps grow and get strong. When a corp starts losing, a majority of the psuedo-loyal members (tend to be recent good recruits) start to leave, especially in the early stages of a corps creation. I've seen this happen with GAM, PE, Pheonix Federation, MIBO, etc. I think mass attacking or stacking timers is a ***** tactic, unless you're at all-out war with a corp of equal standings. Trying to wipe a corp off the map is just silly, especially when districts are worth nothing. there is to many corp hoppers in the game for many corporations to succeed anyway. to many crybaby little kids who as soon as they lose its time for them to switch tags and act like nothing happened. Yes there r very fue loyal ppl in this game. In a game built on team work ppl think they can just jump over to the winning team. But if u dont know how the ppl u fight with play u can only do so good in PC. True team work can beat a team of good players not working together. I like seeing u guys trying to help get more ppl in PC. Gets boaring fighting the same 4 teams of guys. Keep up the good work guys. o7 i love you to death bro but didn't you just hop corps yesterday? KEQ diplomat/ lolromansboat cost more then your whole village
james jared Titans of Phoenix 53	Posted - 2014.11.24 18:02:00 - [48] - Quote No all of the Phoenix federation guys left vengeance because of leadership probalems. I have been with the same ppl that stayed with the phoenix federation back when we frist split up back in the day. We all stick together when we switch corps we all go together. The only way I would split up with my bros would be if most of them quit the game. If that day comes I will probaly just leave dust my self. At heart we will always be the phoenix federation. On another note I like the name titans of Phoenix.
CUSE TOWN333 KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1934	Posted - 2014.11.24 18:06:00 - [49] - Quote james jared wrote: No all of the Phoenix federation guys left vengeance because of leadership probalems. I have been with the same ppl that stayed with the phoenix federation back when we frist split up back in the day. We all stick together when we switch corps we all go together. The only way I would split up with my bros would be if most of them quit the game. If that day comes I will probaly just leave dust my self. At heart we will always be the phoenix federation. On another note I like the name titans of Phoenix. what would have made more sense is just staying n the phoenix federation in the first place. KEQ diplomat/ lolromansboat cost more then your whole village
james jared Titans of Phoenix 53	Posted - 2014.11.24 18:40:00 - [50] - Quote CUSE TOWN333 wrote: james jared wrote: No all of the Phoenix federation guys left vengeance because of leadership probalems. I have been with the same ppl that stayed with the phoenix federation back when we frist split up back in the day. We all stick together when we switch corps we all go together. The only way I would split up with my bros would be if most of them quit the game. If that day comes I will probaly just leave dust my self. At heart we will always be the phoenix federation. On another note I like the name titans of Phoenix. what would have made more sense is just staying n the phoenix federation in the first place. I would of love to stay in the phoenix federation but we were to the point of not having enough ppl to stay in PC with out having to use ringers all the time. Most of our long time players quit the game. That is y we teamed up with vengeance in the frist place. Most of there players were old phoenix members too but there were too many probalems between our leaderships. Hope we dont ever have to switch corps agen. If I do retire from the game I will be in the phoenix federation for my resting place. If I cant be in PC I would not be playing dust much at all. Organized team play is what keeps me playing dust. Pubs just r not that much fun.

Ace Boone Capital Acquisitions LLC 400	Posted - 2014.11.24 20:19:00 - [51] - Quote james jared wrote: CUSE TOWN333 wrote: james jared wrote: No all of the Phoenix federation guys left vengeance because of leadership probalems. I have been with the same ppl that stayed with the phoenix federation back when we frist split up back in the day. We all stick together when we switch corps we all go together. The only way I would split up with my bros would be if most of them quit the game. If that day comes I will probaly just leave dust my self. At heart we will always be the phoenix federation. On another note I like the name titans of Phoenix. what would have made more sense is just staying n the phoenix federation in the first place. I would of love to stay in the phoenix federation but we were to the point of not having enough ppl to stay in PC with out having to use ringers all the time. Most of our long time players quit the game. That is y we teamed up with vengeance in the frist place. Most of there players were old phoenix members too but there were too many probalems between our leaderships. Hope we dont ever have to switch corps agen. If I do retire from the game I will be in the phoenix federation for my resting place. If I cant be in PC I would not be playing dust much at all. Organized team play is what keeps me playing dust. Pubs just r not that much fun. Pheonix Fed was always a group of guys that provided some good fights. Zor-el is a good heavy, it's a shame you guys aren't under the same tags anymore. Only loyal to the republic.
james jared Titans of Phoenix 53	Posted - 2014.11.24 21:21:00 - [52] - Quote Ace Boone wrote: james jared wrote: CUSE TOWN333 wrote: james jared wrote: No all of the Phoenix federation guys left vengeance because of leadership probalems. I have been with the same ppl that stayed with the phoenix federation back when we frist split up back in the day. We all stick together when we switch corps we all go together. The only way I would split up with my bros would be if most of them quit the game. If that day comes I will probaly just leave dust my self. At heart we will always be the phoenix federation. On another note I like the name titans of Phoenix. what would have made more sense is just staying n the phoenix federation in the first place. I would of love to stay in the phoenix federation but we were to the point of not having enough ppl to stay in PC with out having to use ringers all the time. Most of our long time players quit the game. That is y we teamed up with vengeance in the frist place. Most of there players were old phoenix members too but there were too many probalems between our leaderships. Hope we dont ever have to switch corps agen. If I do retire from the game I will be in the phoenix federation for my resting place. If I cant be in PC I would not be playing dust much at all. Organized team play is what keeps me playing dust. Pubs just r not that much fun. Pheonix Fed was always a group of guys that provided some good fights. Zor-el is a good heavy, it's a shame you guys aren't under the same tags anymore. I miss my old tag too. Maby if this corp dose not work out I will see if the boys will go back to the phoenix federation. The way PC is these days we could rebuild and have other corps on our level to fight. It sucks only having a fue corps that u r not stomping or being stomped by. It is really hard to build a PC corp these days because the gap between the good vet players and the new coming players is so big and vet players that u can recruit tend to not be loyal and will jump ship as soon as things start looking bad.
bigolenuts Ancient Exiles. 1291	Posted - 2014.11.26 18:10:00 - [53] - Quote Keep knocking corps from PC just for the lulz...surely people are not worried about Molon Labes iron fist enforcing anything lol A wise man once said, "get that coon off of my porch!!"


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.