Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Adicto One
Nyain San General Tso's Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 18:49:00 -
[31] - Quote
because Dust514 can not look like MGS4?
when someone riding inside of a ship looks worse than a PS2....
AddictPunk
|
Seymour KrelbornX
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
15
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 18:51:00 -
[32] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:Onesimus Tarsus wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:Actually, there are valid tech reasons for the lack of PvE, matches bigger than 16v16, hell maybe even dedicated tutorial maps - simply put, due to the unique nature of the game, Dust has a larger overhead than other games it might be compared to. The PS3 can't cope anything that would add any more.
Controls - the DS3 does not have enough buttons.
Player market / EVE market - overhead, plus network stuff and the whole "not breaking EVE" thing
Balance and NPE - both could and should have been done better. However, Dust is effing complicated, so neither are exactly exactly easy. Dust is unnecessarily complicated. It's a schizophrenic mish-mash of front-end equation fiddling and results-based criticism. They could have easily simulated the ties to EvE, simplified the weapons load-outs, matchmade by K/D(r) and WP/D(r) and had something worth selling until Legion hit. They chose to do, um, this. Whatever that is. Not really, not if they wanted it to still be Dust - although there are some decent efficiency gains to be made by reworking Catma in a similar manner to what the EVE guys are doing with Dogma (assuming the two's inner working are similar - which isn't unreasonable). Matchmaking, yeah that's a whole thing...
I never said I knew anything about coding btw.... I'm simply an intuitive person with some critical thinking skills, so I'm able to see what has been done with the ps3 and then look at dust and see how far below that bar the game is and for no reason that I can see or for that matter any reason ccp ever detailed....
because there is no reason other than they hired the wrong people to work on this project from the jump...name specifics as to what makes dust so much more complicated than any other ps3 game and I bet I shoot you down with logic and examples that counter any claim you make. |
Ryder Azorria
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1002
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 18:54:00 -
[33] - Quote
Seymour KrelbornX wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:Actually, there are valid tech reasons for the lack of PvE, matches bigger than 16v16, hell maybe even dedicated tutorial maps - simply put, due to the unique nature of the game, Dust has a larger overhead than other games it might be compared to. The PS3 can't cope anything that would add any more.
Controls - the DS3 does not have enough buttons.
Player market / EVE market - overhead, plus network stuff and the whole "not breaking EVE" thing
Balance and NPE - both could and should have been done better. However, Dust is effing complicated, so neither are exactly exactly easy. the idea of dust is more complicated than the reality of it.... its all smoke and mirrors just like eve.... eve has almost no graphics when you think about it its just a lot of pretty looking space pictures on a 2-d plain that gives the illusion of a large open universe, when really (and I don't have the exact numbers) every X amount of distance just puts you in a new "room" every time you jump, it just puts you in a new "room" you didn't actualy travel all the distance youre made to believe you covered... dust is the same kind of illusion. it's a lobby shooter... you go from your little room to a bigger room with 31 random people, the red line are the walls to that room... you don't actually travel through a universe to a planet... nothing but the text telling you that you are on xyz planet is done to put you there... my point? pve could be done the same way, incredibly easily... a single player or maybe 4 man "room" where you kill some drones or npc soldiers and such and then back to your little room when its done. there is nothing complicated about doing something like this... there are many complicated ps3 games that do so much more than this... don't let ccp fool you... it was their lack of skill and not short comings on the ps3 that made dust the way it was/is Hi, EVE player here, and as such very familiar with the concept of grids.
Dust's complexity doesn't solely come from the number of people on grid (and 16 v 16 is still pretty high by PS3 standards), but from the Items, skills etc - basically anything Catma (Dust's Dogma) touches.
PvE, I guess CCP could have done a crappy, very much on rails, version where a small squad has to clear out a series of small room / waves - but that would have been both a waste of resources and a slap in the face to the playerbase. |
Onesimus Tarsus
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
2034
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:00:00 -
[34] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:Onesimus Tarsus wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:Actually, there are valid tech reasons for the lack of PvE, matches bigger than 16v16, hell maybe even dedicated tutorial maps - simply put, due to the unique nature of the game, Dust has a larger overhead than other games it might be compared to. The PS3 can't cope anything that would add any more.
Controls - the DS3 does not have enough buttons.
Player market / EVE market - overhead, plus network stuff and the whole "not breaking EVE" thing
Balance and NPE - both could and should have been done better. However, Dust is effing complicated, so neither are exactly exactly easy. Dust is unnecessarily complicated. It's a schizophrenic mish-mash of front-end equation fiddling and results-based criticism. They could have easily simulated the ties to EvE, simplified the weapons load-outs, matchmade by K/D(r) and WP/D(r) and had something worth selling until Legion hit. They chose to do, um, this. Whatever that is. Not really, not if they wanted it to still be Dust - although there are some decent efficiency gains to be made by reworking Catma in a similar manner to what the EVE guys are doing with Dogma (assuming the two's inner working are similar - which isn't unreasonable). Matchmaking, yeah that's a whole thing... I see no real virtue in remaining something that can't work.
Battlefield 1943. Running since 2009. I'm diskinetic, BTW.
Birth, growth, decline, death.
|
knight of 6
Heaven's Lost Property
1977
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:03:00 -
[35] - Quote
okay, let's step back for a second and look at this from a different perspective...
disclaimer wrote:I'm not going to be CCP's pr team or try to explain what "I think" happened. last time I did that they royally shafted me, lesson learned fellas, the only thing you're laser focused on is my anus.
now everything I'm about to say is probably total bullshit, but I feel like it's important to add another perspective.
dust on PS3 was going to fail, that was a given, they optimized it as far as they could and then came to a jucture. do they stay the course and start PS4 development or do they move to a different system?
benefits of PC existing fanbase 10 yrs development experience no need to worry about console lifecycles existing code for nonessential systems (IE the market) a test server
benefits of PS4 small existing hardcore fanbase some code will transfer up with less modification
as a business decision, leaving out your own feelings, the PC has more to offer the company. that sucks but damned if it isn't true. and in the same situation I'd be hard pressed not to make the same decision.
my gif is gone, DINKLEBURG!!
Ko6, scout
|
Seymour KrelbornX
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
15
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:03:00 -
[36] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:Seymour KrelbornX wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:Actually, there are valid tech reasons for the lack of PvE, matches bigger than 16v16, hell maybe even dedicated tutorial maps - simply put, due to the unique nature of the game, Dust has a larger overhead than other games it might be compared to. The PS3 can't cope anything that would add any more.
Controls - the DS3 does not have enough buttons.
Player market / EVE market - overhead, plus network stuff and the whole "not breaking EVE" thing
Balance and NPE - both could and should have been done better. However, Dust is effing complicated, so neither are exactly exactly easy. the idea of dust is more complicated than the reality of it.... its all smoke and mirrors just like eve.... eve has almost no graphics when you think about it its just a lot of pretty looking space pictures on a 2-d plain that gives the illusion of a large open universe, when really (and I don't have the exact numbers) every X amount of distance just puts you in a new "room" every time you jump, it just puts you in a new "room" you didn't actualy travel all the distance youre made to believe you covered... dust is the same kind of illusion. it's a lobby shooter... you go from your little room to a bigger room with 31 random people, the red line are the walls to that room... you don't actually travel through a universe to a planet... nothing but the text telling you that you are on xyz planet is done to put you there... my point? pve could be done the same way, incredibly easily... a single player or maybe 4 man "room" where you kill some drones or npc soldiers and such and then back to your little room when its done. there is nothing complicated about doing something like this... there are many complicated ps3 games that do so much more than this... don't let ccp fool you... it was their lack of skill and not short comings on the ps3 that made dust the way it was/is Hi, EVE player here, and as such very familiar with the concept of grids. Dust's complexity doesn't solely come from the number of people on grid (and 16 v 16 is still pretty high by PS3 standards), but from the Items, skills etc - basically anything Catma (Dust's Dogma) touches. PvE, I guess CCP could have done a crappy, very much on rails, version where a small squad has to clear out a series of small room / waves - but that would have been both a waste of resources and a slap in the face to the playerbase.
should have smelled you for an eve player with how snotty you come across... played 2 years my self would still play if I had any respect left for ccp...
and no they could have done a lot more than this... but yes they could have at least done this...they could have done a lot... so much more than they did. and it is my belief that because they didn't they wont be able to do it on PC either because they don't know what they are doing...games like ff14 have to keep track of tons of items skills combinations of such etc etc... so does DCUO and they are legitimate functioning fleshed out mmo's call of duty and battlefield have pve and pvp and do it well enough millions love those games... tell me why dust was unable to have a 4 hour single player campaign or some such?
theres just no reason other than inability on the devs part why dust is such a poor skeletal lobby shooter... |
Ryder Azorria
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1002
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:04:00 -
[37] - Quote
Seymour KrelbornX wrote:I never said I knew anything about coding btw.... I'[b]m simply an intuitive person with some critical thinking skills, so I'm able to see what has been done with the ps3 and then look at dust and see how far below that bar the game is and for no reason that I can see or for that matter any reason ccp ever detailed....
So in other words, you assumed everything - well we all know what happens when you assume things...
...You make an ASS out of U and ME You miss some really important stuff that is admittedly not immediately obvious. |
RogueTrooper 2000AD
RoyaLBanKof
64
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:09:00 -
[38] - Quote
knight of 6 wrote:okay, let's step back for a second and look at this from a different perspective... disclaimer wrote:I'm not going to be CCP's pr team or try to explain what "I think" happened. last time I did that they royally shafted me, lesson learned fellas, the only thing you're laser focused on is my anus.
now everything I'm about to say is probably total bullshit, but I feel like it's important to add another perspective. dust on PS3 was going to fail, that was a given, they optimized it as far as they could and then came to a jucture. do they stay the course and start PS4 development or do they move to a different system? benefits of PC existing fanbase 10 yrs development experience no need to worry about console lifecycles existing code for nonessential systems (IE the market) a test server benefits of PS4 small existing hardcore fanbase some code will transfer up with less modification as a business decision, leaving out your own feelings, the PC has more to offer the company. that sucks but damned if it isn't true. and in the same situation I'd be hard pressed not to make the same decision.
Iv gotten so bored trying to make people see it from that perspective.
In game as well.
I don't like what they have done but its the right decision.
Dustbook.
|
Seymour KrelbornX
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
15
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:13:00 -
[39] - Quote
knight of 6 wrote:okay, let's step back for a second and look at this from a different perspective... disclaimer wrote:I'm not going to be CCP's pr team or try to explain what "I think" happened. last time I did that they royally shafted me, lesson learned fellas, the only thing you're laser focused on is my anus.
now everything I'm about to say is probably total bullshit, but I feel like it's important to add another perspective. dust on PS3 was going to fail, that was a given, they optimized it as far as they could and then came to a jucture. do they stay the course and start PS4 development or do they move to a different system? benefits of PC existing fanbase 10 yrs development experience no need to worry about console lifecycles existing code for nonessential systems (IE the market) a test server benefits of PS4 small existing hardcore fanbase some code will transfer up with less modification
more bs propaganda from the ccp anal sniffing canine sycophants...
10years of fumbling and bumbling... still have not met most of their promises in eve development... lets not forget what happened to WOD in that 10 years of experience either... just another ccp fail...
console lifecycles are getting longer and longer... whats ps3 going on now? 8 years ish...still making content like DS2 and stick of truth.... how long did the ps2 stay relevant after ps3 release? about 3 or 4 years?..... ps3 will still be relevant for at least 1/2 of that time...
how does ff14 or dcuo test content? they are on ps3... what about when destiny and the division come out for ps4? what about eso online? seems to be going fine... test server is a lame copout exuse there are obviously work arounds.
small existing hardcore fanbase... like eve... and those are the ones who spend the most $$$ and ccp shite on a whole bunch of them.....all because they still cant be honest and admit they are just bad at this thing, and to stuck up to listen to people who know better, or even to hire some... |
Seymour KrelbornX
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
15
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:19:00 -
[40] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:Seymour KrelbornX wrote:I never said I knew anything about coding btw.... I'[b]m simply an intuitive person with some critical thinking skills, so I'm able to see what has been done with the ps3 and then look at dust and see how far below that bar the game is and for no reason that I can see or for that matter any reason ccp ever detailed....
So in other words, you assumed everything - well we all know what happens when you assume things... ... You make an ASS out of U and ME You miss some really important stuff that is admittedly not immediately obvious.
and for all your pomp, you still haven't said anything relevant... you just regurgitate vague statements that have been vomited over and over since this debacle began...
back your shite up... tell us from a "coders" perspective what makes dust more complicated than call of duty, and FF14....or mag... or dcuo... or battlefield... or darksouls 2....
tell us why the ps4 which can handle eso and will be supporting destiny, cant handle complicated dust....
be specific since you act like you know this stuff....
why cant dust have a player market not connected to eve? why cant dust have pve like a battlefield style campaign or a horde mode?
why cant dust have a more in depth tutorial? or cosmetic items? etc etc...
spell this shite out for me oh wise one.....
|
|
knight of 6
Heaven's Lost Property
1977
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:30:00 -
[41] - Quote
Seymour KrelbornX wrote:knight of 6 wrote:okay, let's step back for a second and look at this from a different perspective... disclaimer wrote:I'm not going to be CCP's pr team or try to explain what "I think" happened. last time I did that they royally shafted me, lesson learned fellas, the only thing you're laser focused on is my anus.
now everything I'm about to say is probably total bullshit, but I feel like it's important to add another perspective. dust on PS3 was going to fail, that was a given, they optimized it as far as they could and then came to a jucture. do they stay the course and start PS4 development or do they move to a different system? benefits of PC existing fanbase 10 yrs development experience no need to worry about console lifecycles existing code for nonessential systems (IE the market) a test server benefits of PS4 small existing hardcore fanbase some code will transfer up with less modification more bs propaganda from the ccp anal sniffing canine sycophants... 10years of fumbling and bumbling... still have not met most of their promises in eve development... lets not forget what happened to WOD in that 10 years of experience either... just another ccp fail... console lifecycles are getting longer and longer... whats ps3 going on now? 8 years ish...still making content like DS2 and stick of truth.... how long did the ps2 stay relevant after ps3 release? about 3 or 4 years?..... ps3 will still be relevant for at least 1/2 of that time... how does ff14 or dcuo test content? they are on ps3... what about when destiny and the division come out for ps4? what about eso online? seems to be going fine... test server is a lame copout exuse there are obviously work arounds. small existing hardcore fanbase... like eve... and those are the ones who spend the most $$$ and ccp shite on a whole bunch of them.....all because they still cant be honest and admit they are just bad at this thing, and to stuck up to listen to people who know better, or even to hire some... yea you're probably right, but I'd still throw it out there in the off chance that there is a shred of truth to it.
my gif is gone, DINKLEBURG!!
Ko6, scout
|
Gemini Cuspid
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
70
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:33:00 -
[42] - Quote
RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:Seymour KrelbornX wrote:RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:This wont be nice.
The average gamer is too thick and has too little an attention span for such deep and complex games like eve. Even planetside 2 is too much for most and its a very simple fps lol.
Dust was continually dumbed down for console players and was probably another reason to stop making it on console. The players cant even handle the game so why bother?.
this is why companies churn out game after same shtty game with different graphics and a story, to keep the fishes happy in their bowl and milk the f out of that pathetic attention span and people may as well be as blind as a fish because they keep falling for rubbish like titanfool and lol destiny.
A lot of the new stuff in destiny has been featured in many games as well.
Keep drinking the console scrubaid. troll post is troll. No im serious. you can palm it off as that if you want though, im sure that will make you feel better.
Actually if you take genre on a platform basis then it's the exact 180 of what you are posting: most PC gamers are heavy purchasers of strategy games, mmo's and sims. Most console gamers lean toward action and fps games. Additionally complexity works against a FPS game overall; in EvE you're not limited to an overall set of individuals and players and specific layouts whereas Dust HAS all of these and works pretty much against EVERYTHING you said which is why if I could downvote your post if pure idiocy I would.
Things that would help put Dust more immensely is better matchmaking to ensure that if protostomping among corps would occur, it would be along similar corp numbers and skill sets. Likewise higher rewards for winners of a match can help turn the tide from players who worry more about Kill-to-Death ratio and easy skill points versus those actively contributing. This would have to take into account a more complex approach of how maps, matches and roles would get skill points such as how a sniper wouldn't get penalized for matches just because of being a sniper but wouldn't get as much as a logi/assault/heavy at the lettered objective. This should be a default versus relying on squad designation.
The problem that Dust faces is that the typical rules of EvE and mmo's don't blend well with FPS games; CCP hasn't by far cracked this at all. It has nothing to do with being "dumbed down" but rather how they've just added stuff atop stuff atop content that makes no sense when you look at the paper.
|
Zahle Undt
Bullet Cluster Lokun Listamenn
1677
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:43:00 -
[43] - Quote
Seymour KrelbornX wrote: 10years of fumbling and bumbling... still have not met most of their promises in eve development... lets not forget what happened to WOD in that 10 years of experience either... just another ccp fail...
This, a million times this. CCP has had one "success" and that is using the term success loosely, we'll see how successful Eve is when it has competition in its little genre.
For 6 years CCP labored on WoD a MMO on the PC, so that should have been right in CCP's wheelhouse, but all they have to show for it is a cancelled project and what looks like some pretty neat character models and clothes. So all of you Dust vets who think Legion is going to succeed because its on PC are likely to be disappointed yet again.
Most tankers are like sand people. They frighten easily, but will quickly return...and in greater numbers.
|
Seymour KrelbornX
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
20
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 02:13:00 -
[44] - Quote
Seymour KrelbornX wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:Seymour KrelbornX wrote:I never said I knew anything about coding btw.... I'[b]m simply an intuitive person with some critical thinking skills, so I'm able to see what has been done with the ps3 and then look at dust and see how far below that bar the game is and for no reason that I can see or for that matter any reason ccp ever detailed....
So in other words, you assumed everything - well we all know what happens when you assume things... ... You make an ASS out of U and ME You miss some really important stuff that is admittedly not immediately obvious. and for all your pomp, you still haven't said anything relevant... you just regurgitate vague statements that have been vomited over and over since this debacle began... back your shite up... tell us from a "coders" perspective what makes dust more complicated than call of duty, and FF14....or mag... or dcuo... or battlefield... or darksouls 2.... tell us why the ps4 which can handle eso and will be supporting destiny, cant handle complicated dust.... be specific since you act like you know this stuff.... why cant dust have a player market not connected to eve? why cant dust have pve like a battlefield style campaign or a horde mode? why cant dust have a more in depth tutorial? or cosmetic items? etc etc... spell this shite out for me oh wise one..... well this guy has had like 10 hours to reply... I guess he has nothing more to say.... whole lot of hot air.... I'd like to hear from anyone who can refute my truth with more truthy truth....but the truthiest truth is that my OP is the truthiest... |
Thurak1
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
759
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 02:47:00 -
[45] - Quote
Dust showcases CCP's lack of talent to program for the PS3. By switching to a PC platform CCP is hoping that they can overcome their coding shortcomings with raw computing power. What they really are doing is switching from a mature console with millions of gamers and fixed hardware to a market that has great variations of hardware and significantly lower numbers. Personally I suspect that legion will be a very short lived game assuming it ever even makes it into production. CCP has alienated a great deal of the current player base.
Sure the PS3 might be limited when compaired to modern consoles or a modern PC. However if you look at other games on the PS3 you can easily see that there was a lot of room DUST could have improved on IF CCP had the talent.
Also FWIW CCP is using the unreal 3 engine for Legion which i think is just going to doom the project to failure and shows CCP's unwillingness to actually LEARN anything at all. |
Duran Lex
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
1059
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 02:53:00 -
[46] - Quote
RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:knight of 6 wrote:okay, let's step back for a second and look at this from a different perspective... disclaimer wrote:I'm not going to be CCP's pr team or try to explain what "I think" happened. last time I did that they royally shafted me, lesson learned fellas, the only thing you're laser focused on is my anus.
now everything I'm about to say is probably total bullshit, but I feel like it's important to add another perspective. dust on PS3 was going to fail, that was a given, they optimized it as far as they could and then came to a jucture. do they stay the course and start PS4 development or do they move to a different system? benefits of PC existing fanbase 10 yrs development experience no need to worry about console lifecycles existing code for nonessential systems (IE the market) a test server benefits of PS4 small existing hardcore fanbase some code will transfer up with less modification as a business decision, leaving out your own feelings, the PC has more to offer the company. that sucks but damned if it isn't true. and in the same situation I'd be hard pressed not to make the same decision. Iv gotten so bored trying to make people see it from that perspective. In game as well. I don't like what they have done but its the right decision.
Well it's flawed logic.
They are using the same heavily modified UE3 that they used for dust. They gained that experience working on dust, not eve. So no they do not have 10 years of experience to contribute to legion. They have simply developed a PC game for 10 years on an entirely different engine. Not to mention the development team for Legion is CCP Shanghai, the same exact people that made dust. It's not like the devs of EVE are now making Legion.
There's also a reason they are sticking with the UE3, to salvage code from dust so they don't have to start from scratch. They aren't magically having code available to them by just switching to PC.
The code for the market on dust exists as well. They never implemented it because they had no idea how to regulate the two existing economies. It had nothing to do with consoles or the pc, so that argument is entirely moot point.
|
P14GU3
The Southern Legion Final Resolution.
769
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 03:03:00 -
[47] - Quote
Thurak1 wrote:Dust showcases CCP's lack of talent to program for the PS3. By switching to a PC platform CCP is hoping that they can overcome their coding shortcomings with raw computing power. What they really are doing is switching from a mature console with millions of gamers and fixed hardware to a market that has great variations of hardware and significantly lower numbers. Personally I suspect that legion will be a very short lived game assuming it ever even makes it into production. CCP has alienated a great deal of the current player base.
Sure the PS3 might be limited when compaired to modern consoles or a modern PC. However if you look at other games on the PS3 you can easily see that there was a lot of room DUST could have improved on IF CCP had the talent.
Also FWIW CCP is using the unreal 3 engine for Legion which i think is just going to doom the project to failure and shows CCP's unwillingness to actually LEARN anything at all. Spot on. Except for the numbers maybe. PC has a very good player count, even in regards to consoles. A big issue for PCs is that a lot (not all) of their players tend to stick to a single genre or two, where as console players are more inclined to play a wide variety of games (in my twenty+ years of gaming on BOTH platforms.)
I only play dust514ums now. It was always more fun than the actual game anyways.
|
Seymour KrelbornX
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
27
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 01:29:00 -
[48] - Quote
what really gets me is all the people who think eve players will play legion...
yes its true many will try it, but the hardcore eve community isn't an fps crowd.
they are a spreadsheets in space crowd.
just like with dust you will see a huge surge in player pop when/if legion debuts, followed by a mass exodus pf players who are either not into the gameplay or frustrated by their inability to "get gud" which is the category I think a lot of the eve players will fall into... a lot of them are almost exclusively eve players and will not have the chops for an fps. |
Leeroy Gannarsein
Legio DXIV
362
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 01:49:00 -
[49] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:knight of 6 wrote:okay, let's step back for a second and look at this from a different perspective... disclaimer wrote:I'm not going to be CCP's pr team or try to explain what "I think" happened. last time I did that they royally shafted me, lesson learned fellas, the only thing you're laser focused on is my anus.
now everything I'm about to say is probably total bullshit, but I feel like it's important to add another perspective. dust on PS3 was going to fail, that was a given, they optimized it as far as they could and then came to a jucture. do they stay the course and start PS4 development or do they move to a different system? benefits of PC existing fanbase 10 yrs development experience no need to worry about console lifecycles existing code for nonessential systems (IE the market) a test server benefits of PS4 small existing hardcore fanbase some code will transfer up with less modification as a business decision, leaving out your own feelings, the PC has more to offer the company. that sucks but damned if it isn't true. and in the same situation I'd be hard pressed not to make the same decision. Iv gotten so bored trying to make people see it from that perspective. In game as well. I don't like what they have done but its the right decision. Well it's flawed logic. They are using the same heavily modified UE3 that they used for dust. They gained that experience working on dust, not eve. So no they do not have 10 years of experience to contribute to legion. They have simply developed a PC game for 10 years on an entirely different engine. Not to mention the development team for Legion is CCP Shanghai, the same exact people that made dust. It's not like the devs of EVE are now making Legion. Also there are test servers available for games on a ps3. CCP screwed the pooch on that when they melted their In house ps3's trying to use the carbon engine. As a result Sony said no test servers for you, ever, for liability reasons. That has nothing to do with the pc or console. There's also a reason they are sticking with the UE3, to salvage code from dust so they don't have to start from scratch. They aren't magically having code available to them by just switching to PC. The code for the market on dust exists as well. They never implemented it because they had no idea how to regulate the two existing economies. Again It had nothing to do with consoles or the pc, so that argument is entirely moot point. I'm gonna need you to source those assertions.
A quick google search tells me nothing about ps3 test servers (can't prove a negative and all that, of course), and there is, to the best of my knowledge a significant difference between the market DUST has and the market you allege exists; the fact that we don't have player to player trading does not support that assertion either.
RE: OP.
I was going to respond to your post directly, but your attitude is such that I actually cannot see a way to convince you of our side. There is literally no set of evidence I might supply that could change your mind, whether that evidence be actual or falsified.
Consequently, all I can say to you, based on the attitude expressed in your posts, is this. Grow up.
Great, you don't want to support CCP with your money anymore. I get that. Approaching it in such a juvenile and pathetic manner? Poor show, IMO.
MY ACTUAL NAME IS LORHAK
It would seem like wisdom, but for the warning in my heart...
CCP BLOWOUT FOR CPM1
|
Duran Lex
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
1062
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 02:14:00 -
[50] - Quote
Leeroy Gannarsein wrote:Duran Lex wrote:RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:knight of 6 wrote:okay, let's step back for a second and look at this from a different perspective... disclaimer wrote:I'm not going to be CCP's pr team or try to explain what "I think" happened. last time I did that they royally shafted me, lesson learned fellas, the only thing you're laser focused on is my anus.
now everything I'm about to say is probably total bullshit, but I feel like it's important to add another perspective. dust on PS3 was going to fail, that was a given, they optimized it as far as they could and then came to a jucture. do they stay the course and start PS4 development or do they move to a different system? benefits of PC existing fanbase 10 yrs development experience no need to worry about console lifecycles existing code for nonessential systems (IE the market) a test server benefits of PS4 small existing hardcore fanbase some code will transfer up with less modification as a business decision, leaving out your own feelings, the PC has more to offer the company. that sucks but damned if it isn't true. and in the same situation I'd be hard pressed not to make the same decision. Iv gotten so bored trying to make people see it from that perspective. In game as well. I don't like what they have done but its the right decision. Well it's flawed logic. They are using the same heavily modified UE3 that they used for dust. They gained that experience working on dust, not eve. So no they do not have 10 years of experience to contribute to legion. They have simply developed a PC game for 10 years on an entirely different engine. Not to mention the development team for Legion is CCP Shanghai, the same exact people that made dust. It's not like the devs of EVE are now making Legion. Also there are test servers available for games on a ps3. CCP screwed the pooch on that when they melted their In house ps3's trying to use the carbon engine. As a result Sony said no test servers for you, ever, for liability reasons. That has nothing to do with the pc or console. There's also a reason they are sticking with the UE3, to salvage code from dust so they don't have to start from scratch. They aren't magically having code available to them by just switching to PC. The code for the market on dust exists as well. They never implemented it because they had no idea how to regulate the two existing economies. Again It had nothing to do with consoles or the pc, so that argument is entirely moot point. I'm gonna need you to source those assertions. A quick google search tells me nothing about ps3 test servers (can't prove a negative and all that, of course), and there is, to the best of my knowledge a significant difference between the market DUST has and the market you allege exists; the fact that we don't have player to player trading does not support that assertion either. RE: OP. I was going to respond to your post directly, but your attitude is such that I actually cannot see a way to convince you of our side. There is literally no set of evidence I might supply that could change your mind, whether that evidence be actual or falsified. Consequently, all I can say to you, based on the attitude expressed in your posts, is this. Grow up. Great, you don't want to support CCP with your money anymore. I get that. Approaching it in such a juvenile and pathetic manner? Poor show, IMO.
I never said the market we want exists. I said they have the code to implement it. You are correct, there is a big difference between your assumption of my statement, and what was actually said.
|
|
Seymour KrelbornX
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
29
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 02:41:00 -
[51] - Quote
Leeroy Gannarsein wrote:
RE: OP.
I was going to respond to your post directly, but your attitude is such that I actually cannot see a way to convince you of our side. There is literally no set of evidence I might supply that could change your mind, whether that evidence be actual or falsified.
Consequently, all I can say to you, based on the attitude expressed in your posts, is this. Grow up.
Great, you don't want to support CCP with your money anymore. I get that. Approaching it in such a juvenile and pathetic manner? Poor show, IMO.
lol so let me get this straight... because you feel that you cant sway me to your position I need to grow up? that's too funny...
I need to grow up but you cant even put forth a few bullet points on why you are still loyal to ccp...
if your only goal is to convince people of your side of things instead of having an engaging and adult conversation on why or why not ccp still deserves our respect and loyalty
if you are of the mind set "if you don't see it my way you're wrong and a child"
if you have to resort to petty insult instead of either ignoring the thread all together or providing a relevant reply (perhaps due to lacking one?)
then I think you may need to take another look at who's maturity level has some catching up.
but please feel free to tell me why you think my OP is misguided if you have a valid argument and are also not afraid and mature enough for a rebuttal...or just throw more insults at me... your choice,
/throws lorhak the ball |
Leeroy Gannarsein
Legio DXIV
362
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 02:50:00 -
[52] - Quote
Seymour KrelbornX wrote:Leeroy Gannarsein wrote:
RE: OP.
I was going to respond to your post directly, but your attitude is such that I actually cannot see a way to convince you of our side. There is literally no set of evidence I might supply that could change your mind, whether that evidence be actual or falsified.
Consequently, all I can say to you, based on the attitude expressed in your posts, is this. Grow up.
Great, you don't want to support CCP with your money anymore. I get that. Approaching it in such a juvenile and pathetic manner? Poor show, IMO.
lol so let me get this straight... because you feel that you cant sway me to your position I need to grow up? that's too funny... I need to grow up but you cant even put forth a few bullet points on why you are still loyal to ccp... if your only goal is to convince people of your side of things instead of having an engaging and adult conversation on why or why not ccp still deserves our respect and loyalty if you are of the mind set "if you don't see it my way you're wrong and a child" if you have to resort to petty insult instead of either ignoring the thread all together or providing a relevant reply (perhaps due to lacking one?) then I think you may need to take another look at who's maturity level has some catching up. but please feel free to tell me why you think my OP is misguided if you have a valid argument and are also not afraid and mature enough for a rebuttal...or just throw more insults at me... your choice, /throws lorhak the ball
Based on the sheer amount of vitriol you've spewed, I don't feel it's a worthwhile use of my time. If you'd like me to start working through some arguments, I will.
Expect them in a few hours; I start work in eleven minutes :)
MY ACTUAL NAME IS LORHAK
It would seem like wisdom, but for the warning in my heart...
CCP BLOWOUT FOR CPM1
|
Seymour KrelbornX
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
30
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 03:07:00 -
[53] - Quote
Leeroy Gannarsein wrote:Seymour KrelbornX wrote:Leeroy Gannarsein wrote:
RE: OP.
I was going to respond to your post directly, but your attitude is such that I actually cannot see a way to convince you of our side. There is literally no set of evidence I might supply that could change your mind, whether that evidence be actual or falsified.
Consequently, all I can say to you, based on the attitude expressed in your posts, is this. Grow up.
Great, you don't want to support CCP with your money anymore. I get that. Approaching it in such a juvenile and pathetic manner? Poor show, IMO.
lol so let me get this straight... because you feel that you cant sway me to your position I need to grow up? that's too funny... I need to grow up but you cant even put forth a few bullet points on why you are still loyal to ccp... if your only goal is to convince people of your side of things instead of having an engaging and adult conversation on why or why not ccp still deserves our respect and loyalty if you are of the mind set "if you don't see it my way you're wrong and a child" if you have to resort to petty insult instead of either ignoring the thread all together or providing a relevant reply (perhaps due to lacking one?) then I think you may need to take another look at who's maturity level has some catching up. but please feel free to tell me why you think my OP is misguided if you have a valid argument and are also not afraid and mature enough for a rebuttal...or just throw more insults at me... your choice, /throws lorhak the ball Based on the sheer amount of vitriol you've spewed, I don't feel it's a worthwhile use of my time. If you'd like me to start working through some arguments, I will. Expect them in a few hours; I start work in eleven minutes :)
I'm allowed to be angry...I have not said anything I haven't honestly felt and only on occasion have I been obstinate...but I am only human and whether for bad or good I am passionate about new eden, and it sucks for me that on principle I will not resub to eve or buy any AUR, but I am sick of the way CCP as a company treats it's customers and I will be vocal, I will make my stand, and I will also continue to protest the financial support of CCP.... and if you want my laundry list as to why I'm happy to provide it, but you have been here as long as I have (or longer) so I think you know my grievances...
I still play Dust because it's free and I have invested quite a bit of time and money into it, and honestly... it's a lot of fun.
I deleted dust affter the Rogue Wedding and I want on to play a bunch of different ps3 games ( no ps4 yet)... but nothing was as much fun... so I re downloaded dust.
but, I'm still angry, I feel justifiably so....and I think CCP owes this community a lot. I think any company owes it's customers respect, honest trade, dignity, and quality and responsible service. I feel CCP has let us down in all these areas, I don't understand why so many seem so blindly loyal to them after all that has happened....but i am willing to talk about |
Gemini Cuspid
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
73
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 09:21:00 -
[54] - Quote
Leeroy Gannarsein wrote:Seymour KrelbornX wrote:Leeroy Gannarsein wrote:
RE: OP.
I was going to respond to your post directly, but your attitude is such that I actually cannot see a way to convince you of our side. There is literally no set of evidence I might supply that could change your mind, whether that evidence be actual or falsified.
Consequently, all I can say to you, based on the attitude expressed in your posts, is this. Grow up.
Great, you don't want to support CCP with your money anymore. I get that. Approaching it in such a juvenile and pathetic manner? Poor show, IMO.
lol so let me get this straight... because you feel that you cant sway me to your position I need to grow up? that's too funny... I need to grow up but you cant even put forth a few bullet points on why you are still loyal to ccp... if your only goal is to convince people of your side of things instead of having an engaging and adult conversation on why or why not ccp still deserves our respect and loyalty if you are of the mind set "if you don't see it my way you're wrong and a child" if you have to resort to petty insult instead of either ignoring the thread all together or providing a relevant reply (perhaps due to lacking one?) then I think you may need to take another look at who's maturity level has some catching up. but please feel free to tell me why you think my OP is misguided if you have a valid argument and are also not afraid and mature enough for a rebuttal...or just throw more insults at me... your choice, /throws lorhak the ball Based on the sheer amount of vitriol you've spewed, I don't feel it's a worthwhile use of my time. If you'd like me to start working through some arguments, I will. Expect them in a few hours; I start work in eleven minutes :)
Only one argument no supporter of CCP or Legion can seem to provide and answer for: what does the PS3 in therealm of this known universe have to do with the inability to address simple core mechanics just surrounding functionality and ability to play? Because ANY and ALL excused also presuppose the logic that CCP can create cloaks in this game, make new weapons since beta from nova knives to railguns to equipment that didn't exist on day one like active scanners BUT they CANNOT do anything as simple creating a game that focuses on the issues with core mechanics and player retention for whatever reason.
This also significantly PRESUPPOSES that stuff like cloaks, active scanners, rail guns, mag sec smg's were SO important to allocate resources to that even doing something like making a better matchmaking AI were just tedious to investigate.
Seriously feel free to reply with an honestly legitimate answer to all of this because it's makes no sense to do all CCP did. If my kitchen sink is leaking I don't make an addition to my place and make that additional room a kitchen with a new sink that isn't leaking. No, YOU FIX THE BROKEN SINK THEN ADD STUFF AFTER THE FACT!!! Is this such a crazy concept?
This is why a lot of us feel we get ignored because it seems so obvious: fix stuff, get your basic foundation for the game set and THEN add content. Makes sense? well not to CCP duh! And this is far from a trashing because it's based solely on logic of how hundreds and thousands of ppl act everyday. Car has a broken tire? You replace it and fix the broken tire not add a 5th wheel. That's why tons of us are steaming mad and pissed because instead of fixing stuff and allocating resources, we're getting resources allocated to add game content atop of an already semi broken game WHICH MAKES NO LOGICAL SENSE WHATSOEVER. Yea defend that point white knights because in all of my rants NO ONE SEEMS TO EVER REPLY TO IT. Caps to emphasize for the excessively filled vitrol of a rant because someone is going to say "but the pc is better blah blah blah. Yes that "really" helps as a rebuttal now...
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
5603
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 10:11:00 -
[55] - Quote
Seymour KrelbornX wrote:DCUO, have also been done successfully. Sorry for the cut-down quote having the appearance of poor grammar, but it seemed worthwhile.
I think DCUO needs to be pointed to as an example more often.
Not only is it a successful MMO running on the PS3, but it's currently running on a free-to-play model, AND it was made in Unreal Engine 3, just like DUST. It gets updated less often than DUST (not counting hotfixes), but it's kept being updated for longer than DUST has, and the updates cover more content than the same amount of time spent on updates for DUST.
DUST does have a few advantages over it though. The 16GB+ install for DCUO is one of them. Yes, really. And that was quite a while ago, it's gotten BIGGER since then. Not sure how much of that is the (excellent) voice acting though. Another problem is that the game is, unlike DUST, totally disconnected from its PC-equivalent (which frequently sees updates before the PS3 version, and has a test server while the PS3 doesn't). It also has region-specific servers AND no option to choose which server to play on. If I'm using a New Zealand PSN account, I have to use the EU server. This is despite the fact that I have more friends on the US servers and the fact that I'm closer to America and have better routing there than EU. |
Seymour KrelbornX
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
40
|
Posted - 2014.05.30 01:27:00 -
[56] - Quote
Gemini Cuspid wrote:Leeroy Gannarsein wrote:Seymour KrelbornX wrote:Leeroy Gannarsein wrote:
RE: OP.
I was going to respond to your post directly, but your attitude is such that I actually cannot see a way to convince you of our side. There is literally no set of evidence I might supply that could change your mind, whether that evidence be actual or falsified.
Consequently, all I can say to you, based on the attitude expressed in your posts, is this. Grow up.
Great, you don't want to support CCP with your money anymore. I get that. Approaching it in such a juvenile and pathetic manner? Poor show, IMO.
lol so let me get this straight... because you feel that you cant sway me to your position I need to grow up? that's too funny... I need to grow up but you cant even put forth a few bullet points on why you are still loyal to ccp... if your only goal is to convince people of your side of things instead of having an engaging and adult conversation on why or why not ccp still deserves our respect and loyalty if you are of the mind set "if you don't see it my way you're wrong and a child" if you have to resort to petty insult instead of either ignoring the thread all together or providing a relevant reply (perhaps due to lacking one?) then I think you may need to take another look at who's maturity level has some catching up. but please feel free to tell me why you think my OP is misguided if you have a valid argument and are also not afraid and mature enough for a rebuttal...or just throw more insults at me... your choice, /throws lorhak the ball Based on the sheer amount of vitriol you've spewed, I don't feel it's a worthwhile use of my time. If you'd like me to start working through some arguments, I will. Expect them in a few hours; I start work in eleven minutes :) Only one argument no supporter of CCP or Legion can seem to provide and answer for: what does the PS3 in therealm of this known universe have to do with the inability to address simple core mechanics just surrounding functionality and ability to play? Because ANY and ALL excused also presuppose the logic that CCP can create cloaks in this game, make new weapons since beta from nova knives to railguns to equipment that didn't exist on day one like active scanners BUT they CANNOT do anything as simple creating a game that focuses on the issues with core mechanics and player retention for whatever reason. This also significantly PRESUPPOSES that stuff like cloaks, active scanners, rail guns, mag sec smg's were SO important to allocate resources to that even doing something like making a better matchmaking AI were just tedious to investigate. Seriously feel free to reply with an honestly legitimate answer to all of this because it's makes no sense to do all CCP did. If my kitchen sink is leaking I don't make an addition to my place and make that additional room a kitchen with a new sink that isn't leaking. No, YOU FIX THE BROKEN SINK THEN ADD STUFF AFTER THE FACT!!! Is this such a crazy concept? This is why a lot of us feel we get ignored because it seems so obvious: fix stuff, get your basic foundation for the game set and THEN add content. Makes sense? well not to CCP duh! And this is far from a trashing because it's based solely on logic of how hundreds and thousands of ppl act everyday. Car has a broken tire? You replace it and fix the broken tire not add a 5th wheel. That's why tons of us are steaming mad and pissed because instead of fixing stuff and allocating resources, we're getting resources allocated to add game content atop of an already semi broken game WHICH MAKES NO LOGICAL SENSE WHATSOEVER. Yea defend that point white knights because in all of my rants NO ONE SEEMS TO EVER REPLY TO IT. Caps to emphasize for the excessively filled vitrol of a rant because someone is going to say "but the pc is better blah blah blah. Yes that "really" helps as a rebuttal now...
there is no legitimate answer to this that doesn't blow their "ps3 is obsolete" cover story.... which still makes them look bad since dust launched right when ps3's days were already numbered....
it's funny because no one can really give a good argument as to why ccp had to LEGITIMATELY move to PC.... no one can... 2 people so far in this thread have claimed there are good reasons yet haven't posted one...
in every other thread when the fanbois and employees start trying to explain why all this had to happen and why dust cant work on a console they are quickly shot down with logic and then either ignore you or insult you...
|
Seymour KrelbornX
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
50
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 06:13:00 -
[57] - Quote
still waiting to hear lorhaks reasoning for having such undying loyalty and blind faith in ccp.... |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |