Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1426
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 01:14:00 -
[61] - Quote
TIMMY DAVIS wrote:[ I apologize for hurting your feelings. I will refrain from commenting on anything, in the forums, you say from now on.
Have a nice day.
You are a grand troll lad but until you learn to actually create a cogent argument, reason and clear evidence, like what I presented, will always win. Good luck convincing anyone you are correct until then.
Fun > Realism
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
5246
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 09:35:00 -
[62] - Quote
TIMMY DAVIS wrote:Mobius Kaethis wrote:TIMMY DAVIS wrote:As I neglected to include all of the info I used to compare the two weapons, your surface level analysis might be correct. I do not agree with your analysis though, based on my larger level of info.
Thank you for the comment though. What larger level of info? My argument is based upon the actual stats of the weapons, almost two years of experience as well as testing both weapons on alts with created to only skill into the two weapons (so there were no other supporting skills clouding my observations). How does your own hugely unquantified and completely subjective opinion even come close to countering what I have posted? What "larger level of info" do you have that I and the rest of the DUST514 community don't have access too? I apologize for hurting your feelings. I will refrain from commenting on anything, in the forums, you say from now on. Have a nice day. That wasn't hurt feelings.
It was a request for you to share the "larger level of info" you claim to be basing your conclusion on.
You stated that the Rail Rifle is a better weapon than the Combat Rifle, and the only evidence you have is that you, personally, perform better using it. Many other players use the Combat Rifle because they find THAT more powerful for the same reasons. They're more right than you, but they're still wrong. They've come to an accurate conclusion using invalid reasoning.
Other people use the actual weapon stats to determine that the Combat Rifle is a more powerful weapon. These people are actually correct, but using incomplete data.
The ones who really know what they're talking about have performed CONTROLLED tests with both weapons, and/or have studied the prevalence of those weapons within the playerbase across more than just their own personal experiences. These people's in-game tests have confirmed that the numbers stack up in practical use.
The Rail Rifle is a solid weapon, but the Combat Rifle is demonstrably more effective in most situations. The numbers provided by the game AND the wider player experience confirms this to be fact. If you have additional information beyond your subjective experience with the weapons which proves this conclusion wrong, feel free to share. If not, welcome to New Eden. |
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
955
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 09:42:00 -
[63] - Quote
xxwhitedevilxx M wrote:Matticus Monk wrote:I tried brick-tanking a cloaked shotgun scout. I died a lot.
Guess these dudes got more skill than me. Doing it wrong: brick tanked scouts and shotgun are an easy kill, unless they got you from behind. The real bad thing are Gallente Brick tanked Gal scouts with a complex dampener, cloak and a Combat Rifle.
I am way more afraid of these cal scout with the six kin ACR, most of scout related deaths goes to them... |
Justicar Karnellia
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
807
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 09:48:00 -
[64] - Quote
I hear your pain. Everything you mentioned is a well known issue and we have been told it is on their radar - how far out is unknown - we'll see if they mention anything like that in the EVE fanfest Dust keynote. The new player experience is atrocious and the retention is close to zero. I'm cautiously optimistic about what they are going to announce - they really need to have realistic projections. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |