Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3894
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 01:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP doesn't like BPOs. They're viewed as a threat and/or imbalancing factor to the Dust economy.
First we saw them removed from sale, then we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
There's a conflict between CCP's distaste for these items, and our eagerness to trade them in the upcoming player market.
I think there's an option to appease both parties: Similar to weapon, and other contraband amnesties sometimes enacted by authorities, CCP could offer rewards to players who turn in their BPOs for destruction. These rewards could be lump sums of aurum or isk, or they could be bundles of FW boosters or disposable equivalents of the BPOs themselves.
The details are beside the point. What is important is that with such an act, CCP would get to minimise the effects of BPOs on Dust's economy, and we players would get to cash in on all those duplicates & unuseds that have sat in our merc cupboards for months and months.
What do you think? Is this an idea that appeals to you? I really think it'd be a great way to bridge the gap between our interests, and if it gets much support, maybe it could come to fruition.
No.
|
sebastian the huds
Legions of Infinite Dominion Zero-Day
71
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 01:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
I agree that my exile assault rifle isn't useful for much anymore, but I'm not giving it up unless I get another weapon bpo equivalent.
Just saying
Yes, I will see you
through the smoke and flames
on the frontlines of war
|
Nocturnal Soul
Immortal Retribution
2790
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 01:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
I better get 100million for every bpo destruction or I'm going to bring down the economy with my standard and militia fits +¦_+¦
Its alright everyone, no need to worry it's just an Amarr scout :(
|
Sourdough Muffins
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
112
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 01:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
The only thing unbalanced about the Dust Economy is the Economy itself. When its connected to Eve(in the year 3000) there are going to be major problems. |
Awry Barux
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
1793
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 01:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
They removed BPOs of items that they were removing from the game, specifically a few vehicle modules when the vehicle revamp came out. That's very different than "zomg CCP is taking our BPOs".
Nerdier than thou
|
General John Ripper
19878
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:02:00 -
[6] - Quote
Just make them into rare collectables. if the game stays this small or keeps decreasing in numbers its a fail game anyways. If it grows then these rare collectables can actually stimulate economic growth. Their prices will increase drastically over time.
Only the richest players will be able to afford them. Rich players who can afford to run proto all day. As they get bought and sold isk keeps changing hands. Large amounts of isk.
If this game grows a few players with bpo's will hardly hurt the economy. But the bpo's themselves can actually be used to stimulate the economy.
Everytime I get a like, another bug is fixed.
|
JL3Eleven
Ancient Exiles. Dirt Nap Squad.
1840
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
BPO's are fancy ISK sinks. Dust needs more ISK sinks.
Looking to buy:
Balac's Modified Assault ck.0
Balac's MRN-30 Submachine Gun
Balac's N-17 Sniper Rifle
Daemons Shotty BPO
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3895
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
They removed BPOs of items that they were removing from the game, specifically a few vehicle modules when the vehicle revamp came out. That's very different than "zomg CCP is taking our BPOs".
Oh not one of you people. The BPOs were easily replaceable with equivalents from the new content, and some people only bought aurum in the first place to get their hands on those very BPOs. Without them their refund was worthless. It was the single biggest middle finger to their customers I've ever seen CCP give.
No.
|
General John Ripper
19879
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:08:00 -
[9] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
They removed BPOs of items that they were removing from the game, specifically a few vehicle modules when the vehicle revamp came out. That's very different than "zomg CCP is taking our BPOs". Oh not one of you people. The BPOs were easily replaceable with equivalents from the new content, and some people only bought aurum in the first place to get their hands on those very BPOs. Without them their refund was worthless. It was the single biggest middle finger to their customers I've ever seen CCP give. well they could have nerfed them to uselessness but ccp actually manned up and took them out because they would be useless anyways.
CCP gives us the middle finger alot.. You just have to look and see.
Everytime I get a like, another bug is fixed.
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3896
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
General John Ripper wrote:Just make them into rare collectables. if the game stays this small or keeps decreasing in numbers its a fail game anyways. If it grows then these rare collectables can actually stimulate economic growth. Their prices will increase drastically over time.
Only the richest players will be able to afford them. Rich players who can afford to run proto all day. As they get bought and sold isk keeps changing hands. Large amounts of isk.
If this game grows a few players with bpo's will hardly hurt the economy. But the bpo's themselves can actually be used to stimulate the economy.
A BPO amnesty would increase their rarity. Make them even more sought after. It'd even give them a cool backstory:
"Back in the days of yore these precious weapons were a common sight, but alas, now only a handful remain, coveted by peasants and protobears alike"
No.
|
|
Duran Lex
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
699
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:11:00 -
[11] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
They removed BPOs of items that they were removing from the game, specifically a few vehicle modules when the vehicle revamp came out. That's very different than "zomg CCP is taking our BPOs". Oh not one of you people. The BPOs were easily replaceable with equivalents from the new content, and some people only bought aurum in the first place to get their hands on those very BPOs. Without them their refund was worthless. It was the single biggest middle finger to their customers I've ever seen CCP give.
There wasn't anything equivalent, that was the whole point of the removal.
Not to mention they refunded the AUR spent to make said purchase, with some receiving more aur then they spent.
If that's an issue for you, then your entire idea of giving back BPOs for AUR makes little sense. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3896
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:15:00 -
[12] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
They removed BPOs of items that they were removing from the game, specifically a few vehicle modules when the vehicle revamp came out. That's very different than "zomg CCP is taking our BPOs". Oh not one of you people. The BPOs were easily replaceable with equivalents from the new content, and some people only bought aurum in the first place to get their hands on those very BPOs. Without them their refund was worthless. It was the single biggest middle finger to their customers I've ever seen CCP give. There wasn't anything equivalent, that was the whole point of the removal. Not to mention they refunded the AUR spent to make said purchase, with some receiving more aur then they spent. If that's an issue for you, then your entire idea of giving back BPOs for AUR makes little sense.
I already addressed the refund issue. What value is aurum if the items you purchased it for no longer exist.
My idea makes sense because this one is optional. Nobody's taking these BPOs. We get to decide which option is most appealing.
No.
|
LittleCuteBunny
413
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:20:00 -
[13] - Quote
General John Ripper wrote:Just make them into rare collectables. if the game stays this small or keeps decreasing in numbers its a fail game anyways. If it grows then these rare collectables can actually stimulate economic growth. Their prices will increase drastically over time.
Only the richest players will be able to afford them. Rich players who can afford to run proto all day. As they get bought and sold isk keeps changing hands. Large amounts of isk.
If this game grows a few players with bpo's will hardly hurt the economy. But the bpo's themselves can actually be used to stimulate the economy.
^
Retired.
|
Second Cerberus
Tested In Production
121
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:24:00 -
[14] - Quote
If this was voluntary, that's fine. Involuntary would be very uncool.
For the record, I think the statements that "BPO's are ruining the economy" have neither data nor common sense to support them.
Like many that have BPO's, I rarely use them. Who really fits their main suit with a militia uplink or shield extender?
Their are a few exceptions of course, such as the LAV's or Exiles but overall their CPU/PG stats are too terrible compared to even STD items.
Saving a few thousand ISK per fit is a non-issue considering the trillions of ISK spent in DUST.
"I don't always test my code, but when I do, I do it in production." - CCP
|
Awry Barux
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
1796
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:25:00 -
[15] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
They removed BPOs of items that they were removing from the game, specifically a few vehicle modules when the vehicle revamp came out. That's very different than "zomg CCP is taking our BPOs". Oh not one of you people. The BPOs were easily replaceable with equivalents from the new content, and some people only bought aurum in the first place to get their hands on those very BPOs. Without them their refund was worthless. It was the single biggest middle finger to their customers I've ever seen CCP give. They completely were not replaceable with equivalents, that's why they were removed. The following items were removed:
AUR 4800 Militia 180mm Reinforced Steel Plates Blueprint AUR 4800 Militia Shield Regenerator Blueprint AUR 4800 Militia Shield Resistance Amplifier AUR 4800 Militia Power Diagnostic System Blueprint
The first is a size of plate that does not exist any more, the second and third are passive shield modules, which don't exist any more, and the last provides a small PG and shield bonus, which is another niche which doesn't exist any more. I think you're blowing this way out of proportion. I doubt anyone bought AUR specifically for those four modules which, let's face it, didn't see much use anyway, which is why CCP didn't include them in the vehicle revamp.
As for BPO removal in general, I'm not worried- the really nice blueprints were all from PSN store packs, which makes it much harder for CCP to mess with them (or so I've heard).
Nerdier than thou
|
Vitharr Foebane
Living Like Larry Schwag
1011
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:28:00 -
[16] - Quote
they will have to pry my Templar BPOs from my cold dead fingers...
Amarr: Sentinel V Scout V Assault IV Commando III Logistics III
I place my faith in my God, my Empress, and my Laz0r
|
Duran Lex
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
699
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:32:00 -
[17] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Duran Lex wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
They removed BPOs of items that they were removing from the game, specifically a few vehicle modules when the vehicle revamp came out. That's very different than "zomg CCP is taking our BPOs". Oh not one of you people. The BPOs were easily replaceable with equivalents from the new content, and some people only bought aurum in the first place to get their hands on those very BPOs. Without them their refund was worthless. It was the single biggest middle finger to their customers I've ever seen CCP give. There wasn't anything equivalent, that was the whole point of the removal. Not to mention they refunded the AUR spent to make said purchase, with some receiving more aur then they spent. If that's an issue for you, then your entire idea of giving back BPOs for AUR makes little sense. I already addressed the refund issue. What value is aurum if the items you purchased it for no longer exist. My idea makes sense because this one is optional. Nobody's taking these BPOs. We get to decide which option is most appealing.
The value of 100 aur is 100 aur regardless of personal opinions of worth changing your perspective. With your logic, I assume you would have been fine with keeping your BPOs even though they were no longer going to be usable.
CCP changed their game. It's stated they will be changing their game. They refunded exactly what you spent. You made the decision to spend real life currency for fantasy money, in a game that can change. That was your decision.
Should Blizzard give me my money back for Diablo 2 after removing the mutliplayer? I wouldn't have bought it if it was just a single player game. The answer is no.
Oh, and I spent cash for my BPO. Not aurum. Are you expecting CCP to start selling out a 100$ to everyone who bought the den merchandise pack?
|
J4yne C0bb
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
322
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:35:00 -
[18] - Quote
What I don't understand is why they are considered a threat to the economy, if CCP does indeed view them that way. Most BPOs are militia grade items anyways, and if I created an actual mil variant of my mil Sever suit, it's not like it's that much more money anyways -- I can make a completely BPO Sever suit for about 450 ISK (since I don't have BPO grenades), but I'm still gonna be making money in any match I play in, since an actual mil variant of that suit is gonna be what, 5000K to 8000K, probably? What's the difference?
Min Logi | aka Punch R0ckgroin, Fatsuit
|
Marston VC
SVER True Blood General Tso's Alliance
1665
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:39:00 -
[19] - Quote
Vitharr Foebane wrote:they will have to pry my Templar BPOs from my cold dead fingers...
Yeahhhhhhh my Templar set is worth over 1.5 billion isk in EVE and 300M isk in dust. I aint given that up for nothing
Marston VC, STB Director
|
ADAM-OF-EVE
Dead Man's Game
1227
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:46:00 -
[20] - Quote
no way i'm giving up my bpo's for any reward. just because you have a few hundred or even thousands of them doesn't mean you should be rewarded and the others who didn't abuse the system punished by having their single set removed for a reward they don't want
there is only one thing in dust that is going to destroy the player market and that is PC farmed isk. it generates hundreds of millions more isk than bpo's save
I will logi the s* out of you
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=99075&find
|
|
ADAM-OF-EVE
Dead Man's Game
1227
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:47:00 -
[21] - Quote
Marston VC wrote:Vitharr Foebane wrote:they will have to pry my Templar BPOs from my cold dead fingers... Yeahhhhhhh my Templar set is worth over 1.5 billion isk in EVE and 300M isk in dust. I aint given that up for nothing
if they gave me 1.5bil isk in dust as compensation i would be tempted to slum it on proto suits and weapons instead
I will logi the s* out of you
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=99075&find
|
DozersMouse XIII
Ultramarine Corp
412
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 02:54:00 -
[22] - Quote
you cant have my
skinweave set
blood raider set
templar set
MAG set
militia dropsuit set
militia dropsuit mod set
militia weapon set
militia vehicle mod set
Bacon pancakes makin' bacon pancakes
Take some bacon and I'll put it a pancake
Bacon pancakes thats what it's gonna make
|
General12912
Gallente Marine Corps
175
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 03:15:00 -
[23] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:CCP doesn't like BPOs. They're viewed as a threat and/or imbalancing factor to the Dust economy.
First we saw them removed from sale, then we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
There's a conflict between CCP's distaste for these items, and our eagerness to trade them in the upcoming player market.
I think there's an option to appease both parties: Similar to weapon, and other contraband amnesties sometimes enacted by authorities, CCP could offer rewards to players who turn in their BPOs for destruction. These rewards could be lump sums of aurum or isk, or they could be bundles of FW boosters or disposable equivalents of the BPOs themselves.
The details are beside the point. What is important is that with such an act, CCP would get to minimise the effects of BPOs on Dust's economy, and we players would get to cash in on all those duplicates & unuseds that have sat in our merc cupboards for months and months.
What do you think? Is this an idea that appeals to you? I really think it'd be a great way to bridge the gap between our interests, and if it gets much support, maybe it could come to fruition.
no. just leave them alone.
and CCP, DONT TOUCH THEM!
givng the option, or even suggesting the option, could result in CCP taking them from us altogether. an that could end up killing their game. a majority of Dust 514's playerbase has BPO's. getting rid of them could result in community backlash and veterans quitting (and veterans are a majority of the playerbase).
Every suit Gk.0 <3
Gallente Federation Patriot
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3899
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 03:38:00 -
[24] - Quote
General12912 wrote:no. just leave them alone.
and CCP, DONT TOUCH THEM!
givng the option, or even suggesting the option, could result in CCP taking them from us altogether. an that could end up killing their game. a majority of Dust 514's playerbase has BPO's. getting rid of them could result in community backlash and veterans quitting (and veterans are a majority of the playerbase).
What's wrong with having CCP offer you something for them? And how could such an offer result in CCP taking them altogether?
No.
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3899
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 03:45:00 -
[25] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:The value of 100 aur is 100 aur regardless of personal opinions of worth changing your perspective.
And with that statement goes any legitimacy you will ever have on any discussion of economics.
No.
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3899
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 03:52:00 -
[26] - Quote
Awry Barux wrote:They completely were not replaceable with equivalents, that's why they were removed. The following items were removed:
AUR 4800 Militia 180mm Reinforced Steel Plates Blueprint AUR 4800 Militia Shield Regenerator Blueprint AUR 4800 Militia Shield Resistance Amplifier AUR 4800 Militia Power Diagnostic System Blueprint
The first is a size of plate that does not exist any more, the second and third are passive shield modules, which don't exist any more, and the last provides a small PG and shield bonus, which is another niche which doesn't exist any more. I think you're blowing this way out of proportion. I doubt anyone bought AUR specifically for those four modules which, let's face it, didn't see much use anyway, which is why CCP didn't include them in the vehicle revamp.
As for BPO removal in general, I'm not worried- the really nice blueprints were all from PSN store packs, which makes it much harder for CCP to mess with them (or so I've heard).
Really? A passive shield hardener couldn't have been replaced with an active? An armour plate couldn't have been replaced with that hardener? If the only items you think qualify as "equivalent" are the exact same modules then no wonder you stuggle to think of anything other than a refund.
No.
|
Travis Stanush
GunFall Mobilization
98
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 04:09:00 -
[27] - Quote
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:no way i'm giving up my bpo's for any reward. just because you have a few hundred or even thousands of them doesn't mean you should be rewarded and the others who didn't abuse the system punished by having their single set removed for a reward they don't want
there is only one thing in dust that is going to destroy the player market and that is PC farmed isk. it generates hundreds of millions more isk than bpo's save Don't forget they can do it much quicker too... Damn PC |
|
ChribbaX
Otherworld Enterprises Dust Control Otherworld Empire Productions
1074
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 04:39:00 -
[28] - Quote
imo this isn't about getting a equivalent refund or similar. It's about taking away something I paid for in some way. Yes I know I don't own jack in CCP's universe but that doesn't change the fact that I paid for it.
The discussion that we have here about BPOs ruining the economy and CCP not really wanting the BPOs here is the same discussion that EVE has with Tech2 BPOs - and tbh the T2 BPOs are really not a problem beyond jealousy.
Sure the T2 BPO makes items cheaper than via invention, but the overall return profit wise is larger with invention than the BPO since you can only do one item at a time with the BPO while invention can do up to 11 at the same time thus giving you a better return over time.
Sure you can't exactly compare the two since one generates free fits vs someone that has to buy hers or his. But really, how many mercs run full BPO fits after 3 months?
I run BPO fits when I'm lazy playing because I don't want to lose ISK, but any time I feel like "playing" there's no BPO in my fit and I seriously doubt there is for others either - especially not KDR minded people since BPO vs KDR don't really go hand in hand.
Does BPOs ruin the economy? No, if anything like others said, it's in fact a big ISK sink, and will only become more of one as people will start pay more and more for the BPOs, be it for collectors or for people that just wants to be able to lazy run a free fit every now and then.
So what can CCP do? - Create a player run economy, allow the BPOs to stay, introduce BPCs that players can buy - and let us manufacture the dropsuits and similar found on the market using said BPOs and BPCs - BUT WAIT! THEN THE BPO OWNERS WILL HAVE FREE PRODUCTION OVER THE BPC OWNERS!!! OMG! - Look at my comment about Tech2 BPOs in EVE and you'll see how they don't really benefit that much from this.
From the collector perspective they better not remove them. Plus I paid for the BPO because I wanted it. Make it useless should you need, but they better not remove it.
/c
DUSTBoard
DUST Server Status
|
|
Lucrezia LeGrand
463
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 04:44:00 -
[29] - Quote
I feel like BPO's keep coming up as a controversial issue once every two months like clockwork. I would agree to CCP offering us something to destroy our BPO's if (and only if) it was completely optional, and didn't negate us being able to sell/ buy BPO's off of the market.
Besides, how long is CCP planning on having Dust 514? 3 years? 5 years? Forever? BPO's can no longer be purchased and as the player base grows, and time passes, they will only become rarer. Already most players with BPO's tend to play with other items or use just 1 or 2 BPO's. Full BPO fittings are rare to come across. I believe CCP took them off the market because they were a dead end to monetary success. Which will give you more money in the long run? multiple purchases of Aurum Caldari Assault Suits or a one time purchase of a Caldari Assault Suit BPO?
If CCP cared about the economy they would have done something about PC corps.
Thale groupie (not the gun, but the man).
|
Sourdough Muffins
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
121
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 04:46:00 -
[30] - Quote
Lucrezia LeGrand wrote:If CCP cared about the economy they would have done something about PC corps.
Pretty much this x1000 |
|
Marston VC
SVER True Blood General Tso's Alliance
1666
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 05:08:00 -
[31] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Awry Barux wrote:They completely were not replaceable with equivalents, that's why they were removed. The following items were removed:
AUR 4800 Militia 180mm Reinforced Steel Plates Blueprint AUR 4800 Militia Shield Regenerator Blueprint AUR 4800 Militia Shield Resistance Amplifier AUR 4800 Militia Power Diagnostic System Blueprint
The first is a size of plate that does not exist any more, the second and third are passive shield modules, which don't exist any more, and the last provides a small PG and shield bonus, which is another niche which doesn't exist any more. I think you're blowing this way out of proportion. I doubt anyone bought AUR specifically for those four modules which, let's face it, didn't see much use anyway, which is why CCP didn't include them in the vehicle revamp.
As for BPO removal in general, I'm not worried- the really nice blueprints were all from PSN store packs, which makes it much harder for CCP to mess with them (or so I've heard). Really? A passive shield hardener couldn't have been replaced with an active? An armour plate couldn't have been replaced with that hardener? If the only items you think qualify as "equivalent" are the exact same modules then no wonder you stuggle to think of anything other than a refund.
If statistically it is not the same item then they are not equivalent. One is either more or less valuable then the other. But because there is no base line price point for both items, the respective value of one over the other would be highly opinionated and based on a persons specific perspective. Which will differ from person to person.
People spent an X amount of aur on certain items. Sure, once the AUR refund is done there really isn't anything equivalent to buy with that AUR, but its better then just trying to guess what would be adequate compensation, and having people angry they didn't get an AUR refund because instead of that they got a module they may or may not have any use for anyway. At least with an AUR refund people get to choose what they want to spend it on, where as swapping the old BPO"s for completely different ones would be essentially robbing the customers of 1.) their money, and 2.) their choice.
Marston VC, STB Director
|
Rusty Shallows
1509
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 05:09:00 -
[32] - Quote
Trade Values Skill Points > Boosters > BPOs > AUR > ISK
I'm a reasonable man. Let's trade CCP.
Forums > Game: So here is a cookie and a Like. Please keep posting.
Bwahahahahahahahahahaha! >>> GòÜ(GÇóGîéGÇó)Gò¥ >>>
|
Marston VC
SVER True Blood General Tso's Alliance
1666
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 05:14:00 -
[33] - Quote
Sourdough Muffins wrote:Lucrezia LeGrand wrote:If CCP cared about the economy they would have done something about PC corps. Pretty much this x1000
statistically only about 12% of the total money generated in game daily comes from PC. I think BPO's and the pub matches are probably a bigger concern considering almost everyone uses a BPO, where as the PC phenomenon we have right now is somewhat isolated because the money generated in it is being held by a small portion of the population meaning that it wont cause any sort of inflation.
In short, PC is making some people unfairly rich, but it DOES NOT have a big effect on the future economy of the game.
BPO's are negating the fear of Isk VS risk, and because most people own them the risk of these items causing long term inflation is very real.
In the BPO's defense though, I made an all BPO suit and an all militia/standard equivalent and the difference between the free suit and the isk suit is never going to be more then 6-7k isk depending on what set up your using. So really, I don't think these BPO's are that big a deal at all. Of course I don't have all the statistics to look at like CCP does but meh. Will just have to see how the player market is when it happens.
Marston VC, STB Director
|
Duran Lex
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
699
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 05:18:00 -
[34] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Duran Lex wrote:The value of 100 aur is 100 aur regardless of personal opinions of worth changing your perspective. And with that statement goes any legitimacy you will ever have on any discussion of economics.
Out of context perhaps.
But when referring to your personal opinion that, just because you "feel" that the value of the aurum was lessened by the removal of the BPO you received a refund for, doesn't mean it's fact.
The value of the aurum hasn't changed because you personally[/b wouldn't spend it on something that isn't a BPO.
Hence my statement. [b]Your personal opinion of its worth doesn't change its value.
|
Lucrezia LeGrand
465
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 05:21:00 -
[35] - Quote
it doesn't really matter what we say though. we'll just have to wait and see what happens when the player market opens up. Personally, i would destroy one of my BPO's (just one, and I get to choose which one --_--) to speed up the player market.
Thale groupie (not the gun, but the man).
|
Vitharr Foebane
Living Like Larry Schwag
1014
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 05:23:00 -
[36] - Quote
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:Marston VC wrote:Vitharr Foebane wrote:they will have to pry my Templar BPOs from my cold dead fingers... Yeahhhhhhh my Templar set is worth over 1.5 billion isk in EVE and 300M isk in dust. I aint given that up for nothing if they gave me 1.5bil isk in dust as compensation i would be tempted to slum it on proto suits and weapons instead No... Just no... The Templar set is priceless to me for the smexy looks alone and not even an infinite supply of proto suits would excuse the loss of my Templar set
Amarr: Sentinel V Scout V Assault IV Commando III Logistics III
I place my faith in my God, my Empress, and my Laz0r
|
Regis Blackbird
DUST University Ivy League
157
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 09:46:00 -
[37] - Quote
Vitharr Foebane wrote:No... Just no... The Templar set is priceless to me for the smexy looks alone and not even an infinite supply of proto suits would excuse the loss of my Templar set
^ This is probably the core sticking point. I like my BPOs for the looks, not the free ISK it brings.
Now, the question you should ask yourself, would you accept an infinite supply of a Templar advanced or prototype suites (that look exactly like the BPO), but you had to pay an ISK (or material) cost to produce them?
|
TCP Logihoe
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 11:23:00 -
[38] - Quote
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:no way i'm giving up my bpo's for any reward. just because you have a few hundred or even thousands of them doesn't mean you should be rewarded and the others who didn't abuse the system punished by having their single set removed for a reward they don't want
there is only one thing in dust that is going to destroy the player market and that is PC farmed isk. it generates hundreds of millions more isk than bpo's save And biomssing alts |
jerrmy12 kahoalii
997
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 11:27:00 -
[39] - Quote
TCP Logihoe wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:no way i'm giving up my bpo's for any reward. just because you have a few hundred or even thousands of them doesn't mean you should be rewarded and the others who didn't abuse the system punished by having their single set removed for a reward they don't want
there is only one thing in dust that is going to destroy the player market and that is PC farmed isk. it generates hundreds of millions more isk than bpo's save And biomssing alts Lol your name
Closed beta vet
Tears, sweet delicious tears
|
jerrmy12 kahoalii
997
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 11:48:00 -
[40] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:CCP doesn't like BPOs. They're viewed as a threat and/or imbalancing factor to the Dust economy.
First we saw them removed from sale, then we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
There's a conflict between CCP's distaste for these items, and our eagerness to trade them in the upcoming player market.
I think there's an option to appease both parties: Similar to weapon, and other contraband amnesties sometimes enacted by authorities, CCP could offer rewards to players who turn in their BPOs for destruction. These rewards could be lump sums of aurum or isk, or they could be bundles of FW boosters or disposable equivalents of the BPOs themselves.
The details are beside the point. What is important is that with such an act, CCP would get to minimise the effects of BPOs on Dust's economy, and we players would get to cash in on all those duplicates & unuseds that have sat in our merc cupboards for months and months.
What do you think? Is this an idea that appeals to you? I really think it'd be a great way to bridge the gap between our interests, and if it gets much support, maybe it could come to fruition. If they remofe bpos the starter fits need to be removed
Closed beta vet
Tears, sweet delicious tears
|
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
3309
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 13:08:00 -
[41] - Quote
No
BPO are fine and ruin nothing
I wish CCP made a BPO set for each race like they did with the Templar set for a set price |
The Headless Horseman
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
199
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 13:44:00 -
[42] - Quote
NO! FK NO!
They can give me a cash refund so I can leave...... The bpo's are the ONLY thing keeping me here. That and selling my 900 officer weapons.
For the record, Bpo's don't ruin ANYTHING. They are milita garbage that half the people don't even use anymore. I have full templar set........garbage Skinweaves......... worse then garbage Got spoiled on proto........ :( If they ever took my sever, I would rage quit. That's my money maker. Bpo's are no different then starter gear.
Signed, Sealed, Delivered
|
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
1198
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 13:48:00 -
[43] - Quote
They can't refund items that we bought with real money on limited availability sales... the militia BPOs are different from e.g. exile or dren collectors items. |
Regis Blackbird
DUST University Ivy League
157
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 14:03:00 -
[44] - Quote
I really don't get the argument comparing the impact of ISK generation in PC and BPOs. Is PC a huge problem?, sure... But why should one unrelated problem prevent the other to be fixed?
Both PC and BPOs WILL affect the future market if left unchained (or at least contained), so both will need to be changed in some way.
I have a lot of BPOs, and I use them quite frequently, but I REALLY don't like the current implementation. There are many ways to go about changing these to something useful (and valuable) and still comply to the rules and lore of New Eden, but this has already been discussed in multiple threads.
I can say this though, if CCP would offer some trade-in program to get rid of duplicate copies of BPOs, I would happily comply. Regardless of how and if they will change, I will say with 99,9% certainty we will never be allowed to freely trade BPOs in their current form. |
Banjo Robertson
Bullet Cluster Lokun Listamenn
144
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 14:05:00 -
[45] - Quote
Dunno why BPOs were hated so much, they were mostly just militia versions of modules, so yeah if you wana use the worst gear in the game why not have an unimited supply, if you want to use something better you better have some ISK ready.
Yeah there were some basic level dropsuits and some basic level weapons, but its not like people are running around with proto BPOs |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3903
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 15:06:00 -
[46] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:They can't refund items that we bought with real money on limited availability sales... the militia BPOs are different from e.g. exile or dren collectors items.
They can't refund them. They can offer us something in exchange.
No.
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3903
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 15:08:00 -
[47] - Quote
The Headless Horseman wrote:NO! FK NO!
They can give me a cash refund so I can leave...... The bpo's are the ONLY thing keeping me here. That and selling my 900 officer weapons.
For the record, Bpo's don't ruin ANYTHING. They are milita garbage that half the people don't even use anymore. I have full templar set........garbage Skinweaves......... worse then garbage Got spoiled on proto........ :( If they ever took my sever, I would rage quit. That's my money maker. Bpo's are no different then starter gear.
Wo wo wo!
Chill out man!
Nobody's saying "take our BPOs".
What is so objectionable to CCP offering us something for them?
No.
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3904
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 15:11:00 -
[48] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Duran Lex wrote:The value of 100 aur is 100 aur regardless of personal opinions of worth changing your perspective. And with that statement goes any legitimacy you will ever have on any discussion of economics. Out of context perhaps. But when referring to your personal opinion that, just because you "feel" that the value of the aurum was lessened by the removal of the BPO you received a refund for, doesn't mean it's fact. The value of the aurum hasn't changed because you personally[/b wouldn't spend it on something that isn't a BPO.
Hence my statement. [b]Your personal opinion of its worth doesn't change its value.
That isn't out of context. You just doubled down on that context.
The only value ANY currency has is the value assigned to at the point of an exchange. If this were not the case, currency would not exist at all.
No.
|
Lucrezia LeGrand
Sentinels of NEW EDEN
469
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 15:17:00 -
[49] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:The Headless Horseman wrote:NO! FK NO!
They can give me a cash refund so I can leave...... The bpo's are the ONLY thing keeping me here. That and selling my 900 officer weapons.
For the record, Bpo's don't ruin ANYTHING. They are milita garbage that half the people don't even use anymore. I have full templar set........garbage Skinweaves......... worse then garbage Got spoiled on proto........ :( If they ever took my sever, I would rage quit. That's my money maker. Bpo's are no different then starter gear.
Wo wo wo! Chill out man! Nobody's saying "take our BPOs". What is so objectionable to CCP offering us something for them?
lol. There's nothing objectionable. But people get scared when BPO's are mentioned because 1) quite a lot of people who don't own BPO's advocate some sort of removal of BPO's 2)almost all BPO threads (not this one though) tend to put forward some idea on how to get rid of BPO's 3) We spent real money on BPO's and even though we don't use most of them, we love them dearly (being one of the few things that are permanent in Dust) 4) CCP has yet to give us a resounding, no-doubt, contract-binding, word on what will happen to BPO's in the future.
So yeah, you can hardly blame us to be alarmists.
Thale groupie (not the gun, but the man).
My other car is Utena.
|
Lynn Beck
Wake N' Bake Inc Top Men.
1119
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 15:37:00 -
[50] - Quote
In order to return a profit on Isk spent for my BPO(55 mill) and how much the new LAV's cost, i will have to destroy 2k+ BPO lavs to have saved any ISK.
My BPO Recruit SMG is pretty much a M512 with less Clipsize, and my Recruit Medframe is just a modified mlt suit(which can hit 900hp, but that's not really useful)
General John Ripper is my 2nd best friend!
|
|
Lucrezia LeGrand
Sentinels of NEW EDEN
470
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 15:41:00 -
[51] - Quote
Lynn Beck wrote:In order to return a profit on Isk spent for my BPO(55 mill) and how much the new LAV's cost, i will have to destroy 2k+ BPO lavs to have saved any ISK.
My BPO Recruit SMG is pretty much a M512 with less Clipsize, and my Recruit Medframe is just a modified mlt suit(which can hit 900hp, but that's not really useful) ooooh! you actually have a Recruit MedFrame? Sorry for derailing, but can you please tell me what colors it has, if it looks different than other Cal Medframes, what is its slot loadout, and CPU/PG, and Shield regen at normal and depleted and by how much?
Sorry, it's just I really really wanted one but no one I've ever met has one.
Thale groupie (not the gun, but the man).
My other car is Utena.
|
Seymor Krelborn
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1857
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 15:47:00 -
[52] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:CCP doesn't like BPOs. They're viewed as a threat and/or imbalancing factor to the Dust economy.
First we saw them removed from sale, then we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
There's a conflict between CCP's distaste for these items, and our eagerness to trade them in the upcoming player market.
I think there's an option to appease both parties: Similar to weapon, and other contraband amnesties sometimes enacted by authorities, CCP could offer rewards to players who turn in their BPOs for destruction. These rewards could be lump sums of aurum or isk, or they could be bundles of FW boosters or disposable equivalents of the BPOs themselves.
The details are beside the point. What is important is that with such an act, CCP would get to minimise the effects of BPOs on Dust's economy, and we players would get to cash in on all those duplicates & unuseds that have sat in our merc cupboards for months and months.
What do you think? Is this an idea that appeals to you? I really think it'd be a great way to bridge the gap between our interests, and if it gets much support, maybe it could come to fruition.
but bpo's don't effect the dust economy....want proof?
ancient exiles.... they make the most isk in dust right now with pc and they don't use bpo's teamplayers before them...
if ccp is really concerned about the state of the economy in dust they should fix pc and leave my effing bpo's alone....
this game makes me sad....
|
tander09
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
91
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 15:54:00 -
[53] - Quote
*polishes TOXIN SMG BPO* take my toxin away from me and you will find out why she is so toxic..
Recruiter link here: https://dust514.com/recruit/FepTs1/
Try and steal my BPOs. I dare ya.
AMARRIAN4LYFE
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3908
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 19:06:00 -
[54] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:CCP doesn't like BPOs. They're viewed as a threat and/or imbalancing factor to the Dust economy.
First we saw them removed from sale, then we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
There's a conflict between CCP's distaste for these items, and our eagerness to trade them in the upcoming player market.
I think there's an option to appease both parties: Similar to weapon, and other contraband amnesties sometimes enacted by authorities, CCP could offer rewards to players who turn in their BPOs for destruction. These rewards could be lump sums of aurum or isk, or they could be bundles of FW boosters or disposable equivalents of the BPOs themselves.
The details are beside the point. What is important is that with such an act, CCP would get to minimise the effects of BPOs on Dust's economy, and we players would get to cash in on all those duplicates & unuseds that have sat in our merc cupboards for months and months.
What do you think? Is this an idea that appeals to you? I really think it'd be a great way to bridge the gap between our interests, and if it gets much support, maybe it could come to fruition. but bpo's don't effect the dust economy....want proof? ancient exiles.... they make the most isk in dust right now with pc and they don't use bpo's teamplayers before them... if ccp is really concerned about the state of the economy in dust they should fix pc and leave my effing bpo's alone....
I don't think BPOs are a threat to the economy either, but your argument is a non-sequitur. The 1% aren't the people who benefit from infinite cheap items, so their low use of them makes no difference.
But that's beside the point. It doesn't matter if they're really a threat, only that CCP thinks they are. And this suggestion gives them an option to reduce their numbers.
No.
|
Obodiah Garro
Tech Guard RISE of LEGION
879
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 19:08:00 -
[55] - Quote
wheres the petition to get BPO sales back on the market? Its the only tool a casual player has at padding his isk wallet outside of exploiting or coma inducing american GI/kamikaze style gameplay.
Nemo me impune lacessit
|
Evicer
THE HECATONCHIRES
428
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 19:41:00 -
[56] - Quote
these threads need to stop. For real .There not getting rid of BPO"S. You just want your money back so you can quit the game and loose nothing .Thats all you're suggesting. Fucken go back in a hole.
Fortune favors the Bold,but Success favors the Resolute
Unbent,Unburdened, UNSTOPPABLE Amarr loyalist
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3910
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 19:43:00 -
[57] - Quote
Evicer wrote: these threads need to stop. For real .There not getting rid of BPO"S. You just want your money back so you can quit the game and loose nothing .Thats all you're suggesting. Fucken go back in a hole.
Did you read my OP at all?
No.
|
pegasis prime
BIG BAD W0LVES Canis Eliminatus Operatives
1640
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 20:09:00 -
[58] - Quote
Eh no. I have several boos that i bought for real cash on the premise that they would never run out. You can't just take away or remove something that is bought for real money but they can if you bought them with arum.
Proud Gunlogi pilot and forge gunner since August 2012.
I fought and bled for the State on Caldari prime.
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3910
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 20:28:00 -
[59] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:Eh no. I have several boos that i bought for real cash on the premise that they would never run out. You can't just take away or remove something that is bought for real money but they can if you bought them with arum.
Has anyone read my post? Does anyone understand what an amnesty is?
Nobody's asking CCP to take away your BPOs.
Seriously am I living in some bloody twilight zone where everything I say means something else?
No.
|
pegasis prime
BIG BAD W0LVES Canis Eliminatus Operatives
1640
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 20:31:00 -
[60] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Eh no. I have several boos that i bought for real cash on the premise that they would never run out. You can't just take away or remove something that is bought for real money but they can if you bought them with arum. Has anyone read my post? Does anyone understand what an amnesty is? Nobody's asking CCP to take away your BPOs. Seriously am I living in some bloody twilight zone where everything I say means something else?
We have read your postbut giving the option to hand bpos over volinterraly would leave the door open for the complete bpo removal.
Proud Gunlogi pilot and forge gunner since August 2012.
I fought and bled for the State on Caldari prime.
|
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3918
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 21:19:00 -
[61] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Eh no. I have several boos that i bought for real cash on the premise that they would never run out. You can't just take away or remove something that is bought for real money but they can if you bought them with arum. Has anyone read my post? Does anyone understand what an amnesty is? Nobody's asking CCP to take away your BPOs. Seriously am I living in some bloody twilight zone where everything I say means something else? We have read your postbut giving the option to hand bpos over volinterraly would leave the door open for the complete bpo removal.
How the hell would it do that?
No.
|
Vitharr Foebane
Living Like Larry Schwag
1016
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 23:56:00 -
[62] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Eh no. I have several boos that i bought for real cash on the premise that they would never run out. You can't just take away or remove something that is bought for real money but they can if you bought them with arum. Has anyone read my post? Does anyone understand what an amnesty is? Nobody's asking CCP to take away your BPOs. Seriously am I living in some bloody twilight zone where everything I say means something else? Tell me what they could possibly give me to replace the Templar set... I would be ok with getting a permanent but limited uses per day item but the complete removal my Templar BPOs is UNACCEPTABLE
Amarr: Sentinel V Scout V Assault IV Commando III Logistics III
I place my faith in my God, my Empress, and my Laz0r
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3918
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 23:59:00 -
[63] - Quote
Vitharr Foebane wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Eh no. I have several boos that i bought for real cash on the premise that they would never run out. You can't just take away or remove something that is bought for real money but they can if you bought them with arum. Has anyone read my post? Does anyone understand what an amnesty is? Nobody's asking CCP to take away your BPOs. Seriously am I living in some bloody twilight zone where everything I say means something else? Tell me what they could possibly give me to replace the Templar set... I would be ok with getting a permanent but limited uses per day item but the complete removal my Templar BPOs is UNACCEPTABLE
Then decline if they offer you a trade. Sheesh.
No.
|
Poonmunch
Sanguis Defense Syndicate
835
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 00:08:00 -
[64] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:CCP doesn't like BPOs. They're viewed as a threat and/or imbalancing factor to the Dust economy.
First we saw them removed from sale, then we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
There's a conflict between CCP's distaste for these items, and our eagerness to trade them in the upcoming player market.
I think there's an option to appease both parties: Similar to weapon, and other contraband amnesties sometimes enacted by authorities, CCP could offer rewards to players who turn in their BPOs for destruction. These rewards could be lump sums of aurum or isk, or they could be bundles of FW boosters or disposable equivalents of the BPOs themselves.
The details are beside the point. What is important is that with such an act, CCP would get to minimise the effects of BPOs on Dust's economy, and we players would get to cash in on all those duplicates & unuseds that have sat in our merc cupboards for months and months.
What do you think? Is this an idea that appeals to you? I really think it'd be a great way to bridge the gap between our interests, and if it gets much support, maybe it could come to fruition.
Just don't let players with BPOs trade them or sell them once the open market begins.
Munch
Minmatar Patriot (Level 7)
Dedicated Sniper
|
Vitharr Foebane
Living Like Larry Schwag
1016
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 00:23:00 -
[65] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Vitharr Foebane wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Eh no. I have several boos that i bought for real cash on the premise that they would never run out. You can't just take away or remove something that is bought for real money but they can if you bought them with arum. Has anyone read my post? Does anyone understand what an amnesty is? Nobody's asking CCP to take away your BPOs. Seriously am I living in some bloody twilight zone where everything I say means something else? Tell me what they could possibly give me to replace the Templar set... I would be ok with getting a permanent but limited uses per day item but the complete removal my Templar BPOs is UNACCEPTABLE Then decline if they offer you a trade. Sheesh. Sorry to sound so defensive but if you see my sig you would understand why I feel so strongly about the best BPOs in existence xD
Amarr: Sentinel V Scout V Assault IV Commando III Logistics III
I place my faith in my God, my Empress, and my Laz0r
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3921
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 01:48:00 -
[66] - Quote
Poonmunch wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:CCP doesn't like BPOs. They're viewed as a threat and/or imbalancing factor to the Dust economy.
First we saw them removed from sale, then we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
There's a conflict between CCP's distaste for these items, and our eagerness to trade them in the upcoming player market.
I think there's an option to appease both parties: Similar to weapon, and other contraband amnesties sometimes enacted by authorities, CCP could offer rewards to players who turn in their BPOs for destruction. These rewards could be lump sums of aurum or isk, or they could be bundles of FW boosters or disposable equivalents of the BPOs themselves.
The details are beside the point. What is important is that with such an act, CCP would get to minimise the effects of BPOs on Dust's economy, and we players would get to cash in on all those duplicates & unuseds that have sat in our merc cupboards for months and months.
What do you think? Is this an idea that appeals to you? I really think it'd be a great way to bridge the gap between our interests, and if it gets much support, maybe it could come to fruition. Just don't let players with BPOs trade them or sell them once the open market begins. Munch
That's exactly the kind of thing I want to avoid.
No.
|
Seymor Krelborn
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1896
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 02:01:00 -
[67] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:CCP doesn't like BPOs. They're viewed as a threat and/or imbalancing factor to the Dust economy.
First we saw them removed from sale, then we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
There's a conflict between CCP's distaste for these items, and our eagerness to trade them in the upcoming player market.
I think there's an option to appease both parties: Similar to weapon, and other contraband amnesties sometimes enacted by authorities, CCP could offer rewards to players who turn in their BPOs for destruction. These rewards could be lump sums of aurum or isk, or they could be bundles of FW boosters or disposable equivalents of the BPOs themselves.
The details are beside the point. What is important is that with such an act, CCP would get to minimise the effects of BPOs on Dust's economy, and we players would get to cash in on all those duplicates & unuseds that have sat in our merc cupboards for months and months.
What do you think? Is this an idea that appeals to you? I really think it'd be a great way to bridge the gap between our interests, and if it gets much support, maybe it could come to fruition. but bpo's don't effect the dust economy....want proof? ancient exiles.... they make the most isk in dust right now with pc and they don't use bpo's teamplayers before them... if ccp is really concerned about the state of the economy in dust they should fix pc and leave my effing bpo's alone.... I don't think BPOs are a threat to the economy either, but your argument is a non-sequitur. The 1% aren't the people who benefit from infinite cheap items, so their low use of them makes no difference. But that's beside the point. It doesn't matter if they're really a threat, only that CCP thinks they are. And this suggestion gives them an option to reduce their numbers.
ccp thinks a lot of things that are wrong and they don't have a good track record of doing the right thing by this game.
giving them options to reduce something that has no real effect on the game draws their attention away from the real problems.
pc is a real problem and holds this game back or any meaningful connection to eve.... give them some options on fixing that instead of non issues...
this game makes me sad....
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3921
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 02:11:00 -
[68] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:but bpo's don't effect the dust economy....want proof?
ancient exiles.... they make the most isk in dust right now with pc and they don't use bpo's teamplayers before them...
if ccp is really concerned about the state of the economy in dust they should fix pc and leave my effing bpo's alone....
I don't think BPOs are a threat to the economy either, but your argument is a non-sequitur. The 1% aren't the people who benefit from infinite cheap items, so their low use of them makes no difference. But that's beside the point. It doesn't matter if they're really a threat, only that CCP thinks they are. And this suggestion gives them an option to reduce their numbers. ccp thinks a lot of things that are wrong and they don't have a good track record of doing the right thing by this game. giving them options to reduce something that has no real effect on the game draws their attention away from the real problems. pc is a real problem and holds this game back or any meaningful connection to eve.... give them some options on fixing that instead of non issues...
But CCP's approach to BPOs IS an issue. Their removal from player inventories proves that. Look at all the people wanting to trade them on the forums already. What if trading them is restricted when the player market deploys?
No.
|
Seymor Krelborn
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1896
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 02:17:00 -
[69] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:but bpo's don't effect the dust economy....want proof?
ancient exiles.... they make the most isk in dust right now with pc and they don't use bpo's teamplayers before them...
if ccp is really concerned about the state of the economy in dust they should fix pc and leave my effing bpo's alone....
I don't think BPOs are a threat to the economy either, but your argument is a non-sequitur. The 1% aren't the people who benefit from infinite cheap items, so their low use of them makes no difference. But that's beside the point. It doesn't matter if they're really a threat, only that CCP thinks they are. And this suggestion gives them an option to reduce their numbers. ccp thinks a lot of things that are wrong and they don't have a good track record of doing the right thing by this game. giving them options to reduce something that has no real effect on the game draws their attention away from the real problems. pc is a real problem and holds this game back or any meaningful connection to eve.... give them some options on fixing that instead of non issues... But CCP's approach to BPOs IS an issue. Their removal from player inventories proves that. Look at all the people wanting to trade them on the forums already. What if trading them is restricted when the player market deploys?
then you demand they cut that crap out instead of offering ways for them to disenfranchise us more....
and another thing, think about this, if ccp is so afraid of bpo's why were they still giving them out with the CE and recruit rewards AFTER they removed four of them?
I think youre simply misinformed. ccp has just had so many personel changes with this game they don't know what side is up anymore nor where to take this game next and all youre doing is confusing them.
this game makes me sad....
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3921
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 02:24:00 -
[70] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:but bpo's don't effect the dust economy....want proof?
ancient exiles.... they make the most isk in dust right now with pc and they don't use bpo's teamplayers before them...
if ccp is really concerned about the state of the economy in dust they should fix pc and leave my effing bpo's alone....
I don't think BPOs are a threat to the economy either, but your argument is a non-sequitur. The 1% aren't the people who benefit from infinite cheap items, so their low use of them makes no difference. But that's beside the point. It doesn't matter if they're really a threat, only that CCP thinks they are. And this suggestion gives them an option to reduce their numbers. ccp thinks a lot of things that are wrong and they don't have a good track record of doing the right thing by this game. giving them options to reduce something that has no real effect on the game draws their attention away from the real problems. pc is a real problem and holds this game back or any meaningful connection to eve.... give them some options on fixing that instead of non issues... But CCP's approach to BPOs IS an issue. Their removal from player inventories proves that. Look at all the people wanting to trade them on the forums already. What if trading them is restricted when the player market deploys? then you demand they cut that crap out instead of offering ways for them to disenfranchise us more.... and another thing, think about this, if ccp is so afraid of bpo's why were they still giving them out with the CE and recruit rewards AFTER they removed four of them? I think youre simply misinformed. ccp has just had so many personel changes with this game they don't know what side is up anymore nor where to take this game next and all youre doing is confusing them.
How is this confusing CCP, how am I misinformed, and how would offering players something disenfranchise them?
No.
|
|
Seymor Krelborn
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1902
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 03:08:00 -
[71] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:
ancient exiles.... they make the most isk in dust right now with pc and they don't use bpo's teamplayers before them...
if ccp is really concerned about the state of the economy in dust they should fix pc and leave my effing bpo's alone....
I don't think BPOs are a threat to the economy either, but your argument is a non-sequitur. The 1% aren't the people who benefit from infinite cheap items, so their low use of them makes no difference. But that's beside the point. It doesn't matter if they're really a threat, only that CCP thinks they are. And this suggestion gives them an option to reduce their numbers. ccp thinks a lot of things that are wrong and they don't have a good track record of doing the right thing by this game. giving them options to reduce something that has no real effect on the game draws their attention away from the real problems. pc is a real problem and holds this game back or any meaningful connection to eve.... give them some options on fixing that instead of non issues... But CCP's approach to BPOs IS an issue. Their removal from player inventories proves that. Look at all the people wanting to trade them on the forums already. What if trading them is restricted when the player market deploys?
then you demand they cut that crap out instead of offering ways for them to disenfranchise us more....
and another thing, think about this, if ccp is so afraid of bpo's why were they still giving them out with the CE and recruit rewards AFTER they removed four of them?
I think youre simply misinformed. ccp has just had so many personel changes with this game they don't know what side is up anymore nor where to take this game next and all youre doing is confusing them.[/quote]
How is this confusing CCP, how am I misinformed, and how would offering players something disenfranchise them? [/quote]
your confusing them because this is a non issue yet you speak of it like ccp should be concerned about bpo's
I think youre misinformed because I don't recal ccp saying anything about them being a "threat" on that they are not working as intended... they were removed from the market so problem solved.. and you never answered my question on this note...if ccp is so afraid of bpo's why were they still giving them out with the CE and recruit rewards AFTER they removed four of them?
lastly anything other than having our bpo's untouched and free to trade as was intended when ccp sold them to us disenfranchises us.
this game makes me sad....
|
Poonmunch
Sanguis Defense Syndicate
835
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 03:34:00 -
[72] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Poonmunch wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:CCP doesn't like BPOs. They're viewed as a threat and/or imbalancing factor to the Dust economy.
First we saw them removed from sale, then we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
There's a conflict between CCP's distaste for these items, and our eagerness to trade them in the upcoming player market.
I think there's an option to appease both parties: Similar to weapon, and other contraband amnesties sometimes enacted by authorities, CCP could offer rewards to players who turn in their BPOs for destruction. These rewards could be lump sums of aurum or isk, or they could be bundles of FW boosters or disposable equivalents of the BPOs themselves.
The details are beside the point. What is important is that with such an act, CCP would get to minimise the effects of BPOs on Dust's economy, and we players would get to cash in on all those duplicates & unuseds that have sat in our merc cupboards for months and months.
What do you think? Is this an idea that appeals to you? I really think it'd be a great way to bridge the gap between our interests, and if it gets much support, maybe it could come to fruition. Just don't let players with BPOs trade them or sell them once the open market begins. Munch That's exactly the kind of thing I want to avoid.
Which one?
Allowing them to trade or not allowing them to trade?
Munch
Minmatar Patriot (Level 7)
Dedicated Sniper
|
Duran Lex
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
703
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 03:40:00 -
[73] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Duran Lex wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Duran Lex wrote:The value of 100 aur is 100 aur regardless of personal opinions of worth changing your perspective. And with that statement goes any legitimacy you will ever have on any discussion of economics. Out of context perhaps. But when referring to your personal opinion that, just because you "feel" that the value of the aurum was lessened by the removal of the BPO you received a refund for, doesn't mean it's fact. The value of the aurum hasn't changed because you personally[/b wouldn't spend it on something that isn't a BPO.
Hence my statement. [b]Your personal opinion of its worth doesn't change its value. That isn't out of context. You just doubled down on that context. The only value ANY currency has is the value assigned to at the point of an exchange. If this were not the case, currency would not exist at all.
Correct.
And as I've stated for the 3rd time now, your personal opinions haven't changed the value of aur nor will they ever change its value.
I would say I'm surprised you aren't comprehending this, but after continuing to read your responses in this thread.... |
Lucrezia LeGrand
Sentinels of NEW EDEN
472
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 03:45:00 -
[74] - Quote
this is still a thing? o_O
Thale groupie (not the gun, but the man).
My other car is Utena.
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3921
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 03:59:00 -
[75] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:But CCP's approach to BPOs IS an issue. Their removal from player inventories proves that. Look at all the people wanting to trade them on the forums already. What if trading them is restricted when the player market deploys? How is this confusing CCP, how am I misinformed, and how would offering players something disenfranchise them?
your confusing them because this is a non issue yet you speak of it like ccp should be concerned about bpo's
I think youre misinformed because I don't recal ccp saying anything about them being a "threat" on that they are not working as intended... they were removed from the market so problem solved.. and you never answered my question on this note...if ccp is so afraid of bpo's why were they still giving them out with the CE and recruit rewards AFTER they removed four of them?
lastly anything other than having our bpo's untouched and free to trade as was intended when ccp sold them to us disenfranchises us.[/quote]
I've never spoken like CCP should be concerned. I've said the opposite several times. All I have done is acknowledge that CCP are concerned. Be that rational or not.
An economic item not working as intended = threat to the economy. It doesn't have to be a major threat. It doesn't have to compete with the threat of PC or EVE isk. Your question is a little redundant given that BPOs were removed from the market in the first place. The fact that a few still remain available is moot.
You didn't answer my question. How does offering players something disenfranchise them? Your supposed answer was filled with caveats.
No.
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3921
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 04:00:00 -
[76] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Duran Lex wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Duran Lex wrote:The value of 100 aur is 100 aur regardless of personal opinions of worth changing your perspective. And with that statement goes any legitimacy you will ever have on any discussion of economics. Out of context perhaps. But when referring to your personal opinion that, just because you "feel" that the value of the aurum was lessened by the removal of the BPO you received a refund for, doesn't mean it's fact. The value of the aurum hasn't changed because you personally[/b wouldn't spend it on something that isn't a BPO.
Hence my statement. [b]Your personal opinion of its worth doesn't change its value. That isn't out of context. You just doubled down on that context. The only value ANY currency has is the value assigned to at the point of an exchange. If this were not the case, currency would not exist at all. Correct. And as I've stated for the 3rd time now, your personal opinions haven't changed the value of aur nor will they ever change its value. I would say I'm surprised you aren't comprehending this, but after continuing to read your responses in this thread....
Wow.
Just wow.
No.
|
Nevyn Tazinas
Company of Marcher Lords Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 04:12:00 -
[77] - Quote
Regis Blackbird wrote:
^ This is probably the core sticking point. I like my BPOs for the looks, not the free ISK it brings.
Now, the question you should ask yourself, would you accept an infinite supply of a Templar advanced or prototype suites (that look exactly like the BPO), but you had to pay an ISK (or material) cost to produce them?
This is still a BPO at that point. They have just changed how BPO's work to require an isk cost to manufacture them.
I wouldn't mind having to pay isk to utilise a BPO, assuming it's less isk than buying the same item from NPC seed. And there was a player market, so I could sell the items for a profit to everyone else without sexy looks if I wanted.
There would also have to be a time component of course so one person couldn't supply the entire market and selling the items becomes a trade off between personal use & sales.
So, reliant on a player market, BPO's requiring cost (To reflect materials) works for me. As a note, unless I can't read statistics properly, the Templar suits are actually basic suits. The Templar equipment certainly is basic. |
Lucrezia LeGrand
Sentinels of NEW EDEN
473
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 04:16:00 -
[78] - Quote
If BPO's become manufactured items that we have to pay isk to use I want them super cheap. Like militia cheap, even for my "standard" Dragonfly Suits.
Thale groupie (not the gun, but the man).
My other car is Utena.
|
Vitharr Foebane
Living Like Larry Schwag
1017
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 04:35:00 -
[79] - Quote
Nevyn Tazinas wrote:Regis Blackbird wrote:
^ This is probably the core sticking point. I like my BPOs for the looks, not the free ISK it brings.
Now, the question you should ask yourself, would you accept an infinite supply of a Templar advanced or prototype suites (that look exactly like the BPO), but you had to pay an ISK (or material) cost to produce them?
This is still a BPO at that point. They have just changed how BPO's work to require an isk cost to manufacture them. I wouldn't mind having to pay isk to utilise a BPO, assuming it's less isk than buying the same item from NPC seed. And there was a player market, so I could sell the items for a profit to everyone else without sexy looks if I wanted. There would also have to be a time component of course so one person couldn't supply the entire market and selling the items becomes a trade off between personal use & sales. So, reliant on a player market, BPO's requiring cost (To reflect materials) works for me. As a note, unless I can't read statistics properly, the Templar suits are actually basic suits. The Templar equipment certainly is basic. How DARE you call the Templar set "basic"... While they indeed use STD stats(mostly LR requires 4 less CPU) they are literally they sexiest suits(and weapons) in the game
Amarr: Sentinel V Scout V Assault IV Commando III Logistics III
I place my faith in my God, my Empress, and my Laz0r
|
Seymor Krelborn
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1910
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 04:49:00 -
[80] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:But CCP's approach to BPOs IS an issue. Their removal from player inventories proves that. Look at all the people wanting to trade them on the forums already. What if trading them is restricted when the player market deploys? How is this confusing CCP, how am I misinformed, and how would offering players something disenfranchise them? your confusing them because this is a non issue yet you speak of it like ccp should be concerned about bpo's I think youre misinformed because I don't recal ccp saying anything about them being a "threat" on that they are not working as intended... they were removed from the market so problem solved.. and you never answered my question on this note...if ccp is so afraid of bpo's why were they still giving them out with the CE and recruit rewards AFTER they removed four of them? lastly anything other than having our bpo's untouched and free to trade as was intended when ccp sold them to us disenfranchises us.
chunky munkey wrote:I've never spoken like CCP should be concerned. I've said the opposite several times. All I have done is acknowledge that CCP are concerned. Be that rational or not.
An economic item not working as intended = threat to the economy. It doesn't have to be a major threat. It doesn't have to compete with the threat of PC or EVE isk. Your question is a little redundant given that BPOs were removed from the market in the first place. The fact that a few still remain available is moot.
You didn't answer my question. How does offering players something disenfranchise them? Your supposed answer was filled with caveats.
im sorry chunky, but your replies are disjointed and your conclusions are alarmingly dim witted
I m afraid I must end this relationship....
this game makes me sad....
|
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3928
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 14:25:00 -
[81] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:chunky munkey wrote:I've never spoken like CCP should be concerned. I've said the opposite several times. All I have done is acknowledge that CCP are concerned. Be that rational or not.
An economic item not working as intended = threat to the economy. It doesn't have to be a major threat. It doesn't have to compete with the threat of PC or EVE isk. Your question is a little redundant given that BPOs were removed from the market in the first place. The fact that a few still remain available is moot.
You didn't answer my question. How does offering players something disenfranchise them? Your supposed answer was filled with caveats. im sorry chunky, but your replies are disjointed and your conclusions are alarmingly dim witted I m afraid I must end this relationship....
Right. I'm sure it has nothing to do with me relpying succinctly to each of your arguments.
No.
|
Regis Blackbird
DUST University Ivy League
159
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 15:40:00 -
[82] - Quote
Nevyn Tazinas wrote:Regis Blackbird wrote:
^ This is probably the core sticking point. I like my BPOs for the looks, not the free ISK it brings.
Now, the question you should ask yourself, would you accept an infinite supply of a Templar advanced or prototype suites (that look exactly like the BPO), but you had to pay an ISK (or material) cost to produce them?
This is still a BPO at that point. They have just changed how BPO's work to require an isk cost to manufacture them. I wouldn't mind having to pay isk to utilise a BPO, assuming it's less isk than buying the same item from NPC seed. And there was a player market, so I could sell the items for a profit to everyone else without sexy looks if I wanted. There would also have to be a time component of course so one person couldn't supply the entire market and selling the items becomes a trade off between personal use & sales. So, reliant on a player market, BPO's requiring cost (To reflect materials) works for me. As a note, unless I can't read statistics properly, the Templar suits are actually basic suits. The Templar equipment certainly is basic.
Current Templar suites are basic, that is correct.
My comment was more inclined to compensate for the "removal" (read: modification) of the current BPOs, if there is one. I.e. - BPOs suddenly carries a material cost (slightly less than market price), but stats stay the same = shitstorm on the forum about BPOs being worth less, not what I payed for, lawsuits etc etc.
Vs
- BPOs suddenly carries a material cost, but stats bumped up to advanced or proto. = probably still some whining on the forums, but suddenly you have a "permanent" sexy suite you actually could use outside of pub matches. For me that would be a fair compromise. |
CRNWLLC
Screwy Rabbit ULC
188
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 16:36:00 -
[83] - Quote
I think that ChribbaX's comparison of Dust BPOs to EVE T2 BPOs is a very good analogy--the problem mostly boils down to jealousy, and doesn't have much of an effect on the economy. Assuming manufacturing is even brought to Dust, having Dust BPOs function the same way as T2 BPOs in EVE pretty much solves everyone's problems (except the jellies). Also, I'm almost certainly not going to participate in manufacturing when/if it's available, and I'm sure the same is true for other mercs, so again, any feared, massive upset to the (as yet non-existent) economy seems a little premature.
Many people say that BPOs undermine the notion of "Risk vs. ISK". I do not think this is the case because, as other posters have mentioned, running BPOs is suboptimal for maintaining or improving one's KDR; since KDR (and WP, and possibly other numbers if CCP ever introduces more robust statistics) is also quite important to numerous players, they are inclined to run higher-tiered gear as running BPOs (ie, militia and standard level gear) definitely increases the risk of marring one's stats. It think most folks here will agree that, for the most part, the better gear a merc fits, the better the merc typically performs.
It's also worth noting that until at least the middle or end of January, the 'Exile' Assault Rifle BPO was available on the marketplace, via whatever AUR pack it came in. So, at least one BPO was available well after CCP started changing their stance on them and people started to get their feathers ruffled.
Since it does mostly seem to be an issue of jealousy, I'd say there's a few reasonable solutions. 1) What ChribbaX suggested; 2) make BPOs non-tradeable and have future events/marketplace packs where newer players can procure them (this mitigates jealousy, and since a 'Dren' AR = 'Exile' AR = 'Toxic' AR with different skins, who really cares?); 3) reinstate BPOs as normal, AUR-purchasable items, making them unusable for manufacturing or trading (this way, any Dust-side Ash Ketchums can collect 'em all and everyone feels warm fuzzies for being treated the same, regardless of when they started playing).
Or, here's an even more daring thought (but it requires CCP to provide a complete set of racial heavy weapons): since starter fits suck bwawls anyway, why not grant each merc a set of racial basic/standard level BPOs for building out whatever suits they dern well please? This would make selecting a race somewhat more significant (it determines what your free, "starter" BPOs will be), would remove the worthless starter fits from the game, and would make basic gear more relevant. If every new merc started the game with a set of racial BPOs (say, a basic suit in each size with a basic 'nade, racial light, heavy, and sidearm weapons; race-aligned tanking mods, etc.) they could mix and match, and it would make the new player experience much better, since trying to put together a fit with the starter suits is next to impossible without decent skills. Of course, all these BPOs would be available on the market, so interested parties could acquire each race's BPOs.
My other dropsuit is a Python.
|
Seymor Krelborn
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1916
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 17:59:00 -
[84] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:chunky munkey wrote:I've never spoken like CCP should be concerned. I've said the opposite several times. All I have done is acknowledge that CCP are concerned. Be that rational or not.
An economic item not working as intended = threat to the economy. It doesn't have to be a major threat. It doesn't have to compete with the threat of PC or EVE isk. Your question is a little redundant given that BPOs were removed from the market in the first place. The fact that a few still remain available is moot.
You didn't answer my question. How does offering players something disenfranchise them? Your supposed answer was filled with caveats. im sorry chunky, but your replies are disjointed and your conclusions are alarmingly dim witted I m afraid I must end this relationship.... Right. I'm sure it has nothing to do with me relpying succinctly to each of your arguments.
no it really doesn't... you have not refuted one of my points coherently, and I cant debate someone who cant follow a conversation... all the points I made are valid and I've yet to hear anything from you that makes sense disputing them.
this game makes me sad....
|
Seymor Krelborn
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1916
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 18:03:00 -
[85] - Quote
CRNWLLC wrote:I think that ChribbaX's comparison of Dust BPOs to EVE T2 BPOs is a very good analogy--the problem mostly boils down to jealousy, and doesn't have much of an effect on the economy. Assuming manufacturing is even brought to Dust, having Dust BPOs function the same way as T2 BPOs in EVE pretty much solves everyone's problems (except the jellies). Also, I'm almost certainly not going to participate in manufacturing when/if it's available, and I'm sure the same is true for other mercs, so again, any feared, massive upset to the (as yet non-existent) economy seems a little premature. Many people say that BPOs undermine the notion of "Risk vs. ISK". I do not think this is the case because, as other posters have mentioned, running BPOs is suboptimal for maintaining or improving one's KDR; since KDR (and WP, and possibly other numbers if CCP ever introduces more robust statistics) is also quite important to numerous players, they are inclined to run higher-tiered gear as running BPOs (ie, militia and standard level gear) definitely increases the risk of marring one's stats. It think most folks here will agree that, for the most part, the better gear a merc fits, the better the merc typically performs. It's also worth noting that until at least the middle or end of January, the 'Exile' Assault Rifle BPO was available on the marketplace, via whatever AUR pack it came in. So, at least one BPO was available well after CCP started changing their stance on them and people started to get their feathers ruffled. Since it does mostly seem to be an issue of jealousy, I'd say there's a few reasonable solutions. 1) What ChribbaX suggested; 2) make BPOs non-tradeable and have future events/marketplace packs where newer players can procure them (this mitigates jealousy, and since a 'Dren' AR = 'Exile' AR = 'Toxic' AR with different skins, who really cares?); 3) reinstate BPOs as normal, AUR-purchasable items, making them unusable for manufacturing or trading (this way, any Dust-side Ash Ketchums can collect 'em all and everyone feels warm fuzzies for being treated the same, regardless of when they started playing). Or, here's an even more daring thought (but it requires CCP to provide a complete set of racial heavy weapons): since starter fits suck bwawls anyway, why not grant each merc a set of racial basic/standard level BPOs for building out whatever suits they dern well please? This would make selecting a race somewhat more significant (it determines what your free, "starter" BPOs will be), would remove the worthless starter fits from the game, and would make basic gear more relevant. If every new merc started the game with a set of racial BPOs (say, a basic suit in each size with a basic 'nade, racial light, heavy, and sidearm weapons; race-aligned tanking mods, etc.) they could mix and match, and it would make the new player experience much better, since trying to put together a fit with the starter suits is next to impossible without decent skills. Of course, all these BPOs would be available on the market, so interested parties could acquire each race's BPOs.
I have said much of this in the past and agree with every word.... chunk doesn't seem to understand this, so I'm awaiting his lol reply to your sound logic.
this game makes me sad....
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3930
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:01:00 -
[86] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:I have said much of this in the past and agree with every word.... chunk doesn't seem to understand this, so I'm awaiting his lol reply to your sound logic.
Nothing said there contradicted anything I've said.
Sounds more like you're hanging around here on butthurt.
No.
|
Seymor Krelborn
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1922
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:14:00 -
[87] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:I have said much of this in the past and agree with every word.... chunk doesn't seem to understand this, so I'm awaiting his lol reply to your sound logic. Nothing said there contradicted anything I've said. Sounds more like you're hanging around here on butthurt.
my butt hurting has nothing to do with this thread....had the wife strap on last night...its hurts so good....in my butt.
this game makes me sad....
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |