Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3918
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 21:19:00 -
[61] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Eh no. I have several boos that i bought for real cash on the premise that they would never run out. You can't just take away or remove something that is bought for real money but they can if you bought them with arum. Has anyone read my post? Does anyone understand what an amnesty is? Nobody's asking CCP to take away your BPOs. Seriously am I living in some bloody twilight zone where everything I say means something else? We have read your postbut giving the option to hand bpos over volinterraly would leave the door open for the complete bpo removal.
How the hell would it do that?
No.
|
Vitharr Foebane
Living Like Larry Schwag
1016
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 23:56:00 -
[62] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Eh no. I have several boos that i bought for real cash on the premise that they would never run out. You can't just take away or remove something that is bought for real money but they can if you bought them with arum. Has anyone read my post? Does anyone understand what an amnesty is? Nobody's asking CCP to take away your BPOs. Seriously am I living in some bloody twilight zone where everything I say means something else? Tell me what they could possibly give me to replace the Templar set... I would be ok with getting a permanent but limited uses per day item but the complete removal my Templar BPOs is UNACCEPTABLE
Amarr: Sentinel V Scout V Assault IV Commando III Logistics III
I place my faith in my God, my Empress, and my Laz0r
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3918
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 23:59:00 -
[63] - Quote
Vitharr Foebane wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Eh no. I have several boos that i bought for real cash on the premise that they would never run out. You can't just take away or remove something that is bought for real money but they can if you bought them with arum. Has anyone read my post? Does anyone understand what an amnesty is? Nobody's asking CCP to take away your BPOs. Seriously am I living in some bloody twilight zone where everything I say means something else? Tell me what they could possibly give me to replace the Templar set... I would be ok with getting a permanent but limited uses per day item but the complete removal my Templar BPOs is UNACCEPTABLE
Then decline if they offer you a trade. Sheesh.
No.
|
Poonmunch
Sanguis Defense Syndicate
835
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 00:08:00 -
[64] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:CCP doesn't like BPOs. They're viewed as a threat and/or imbalancing factor to the Dust economy.
First we saw them removed from sale, then we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
There's a conflict between CCP's distaste for these items, and our eagerness to trade them in the upcoming player market.
I think there's an option to appease both parties: Similar to weapon, and other contraband amnesties sometimes enacted by authorities, CCP could offer rewards to players who turn in their BPOs for destruction. These rewards could be lump sums of aurum or isk, or they could be bundles of FW boosters or disposable equivalents of the BPOs themselves.
The details are beside the point. What is important is that with such an act, CCP would get to minimise the effects of BPOs on Dust's economy, and we players would get to cash in on all those duplicates & unuseds that have sat in our merc cupboards for months and months.
What do you think? Is this an idea that appeals to you? I really think it'd be a great way to bridge the gap between our interests, and if it gets much support, maybe it could come to fruition.
Just don't let players with BPOs trade them or sell them once the open market begins.
Munch
Minmatar Patriot (Level 7)
Dedicated Sniper
|
Vitharr Foebane
Living Like Larry Schwag
1016
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 00:23:00 -
[65] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Vitharr Foebane wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Eh no. I have several boos that i bought for real cash on the premise that they would never run out. You can't just take away or remove something that is bought for real money but they can if you bought them with arum. Has anyone read my post? Does anyone understand what an amnesty is? Nobody's asking CCP to take away your BPOs. Seriously am I living in some bloody twilight zone where everything I say means something else? Tell me what they could possibly give me to replace the Templar set... I would be ok with getting a permanent but limited uses per day item but the complete removal my Templar BPOs is UNACCEPTABLE Then decline if they offer you a trade. Sheesh. Sorry to sound so defensive but if you see my sig you would understand why I feel so strongly about the best BPOs in existence xD
Amarr: Sentinel V Scout V Assault IV Commando III Logistics III
I place my faith in my God, my Empress, and my Laz0r
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3921
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 01:48:00 -
[66] - Quote
Poonmunch wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:CCP doesn't like BPOs. They're viewed as a threat and/or imbalancing factor to the Dust economy.
First we saw them removed from sale, then we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
There's a conflict between CCP's distaste for these items, and our eagerness to trade them in the upcoming player market.
I think there's an option to appease both parties: Similar to weapon, and other contraband amnesties sometimes enacted by authorities, CCP could offer rewards to players who turn in their BPOs for destruction. These rewards could be lump sums of aurum or isk, or they could be bundles of FW boosters or disposable equivalents of the BPOs themselves.
The details are beside the point. What is important is that with such an act, CCP would get to minimise the effects of BPOs on Dust's economy, and we players would get to cash in on all those duplicates & unuseds that have sat in our merc cupboards for months and months.
What do you think? Is this an idea that appeals to you? I really think it'd be a great way to bridge the gap between our interests, and if it gets much support, maybe it could come to fruition. Just don't let players with BPOs trade them or sell them once the open market begins. Munch
That's exactly the kind of thing I want to avoid.
No.
|
Seymor Krelborn
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1896
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 02:01:00 -
[67] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:CCP doesn't like BPOs. They're viewed as a threat and/or imbalancing factor to the Dust economy.
First we saw them removed from sale, then we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
There's a conflict between CCP's distaste for these items, and our eagerness to trade them in the upcoming player market.
I think there's an option to appease both parties: Similar to weapon, and other contraband amnesties sometimes enacted by authorities, CCP could offer rewards to players who turn in their BPOs for destruction. These rewards could be lump sums of aurum or isk, or they could be bundles of FW boosters or disposable equivalents of the BPOs themselves.
The details are beside the point. What is important is that with such an act, CCP would get to minimise the effects of BPOs on Dust's economy, and we players would get to cash in on all those duplicates & unuseds that have sat in our merc cupboards for months and months.
What do you think? Is this an idea that appeals to you? I really think it'd be a great way to bridge the gap between our interests, and if it gets much support, maybe it could come to fruition. but bpo's don't effect the dust economy....want proof? ancient exiles.... they make the most isk in dust right now with pc and they don't use bpo's teamplayers before them... if ccp is really concerned about the state of the economy in dust they should fix pc and leave my effing bpo's alone.... I don't think BPOs are a threat to the economy either, but your argument is a non-sequitur. The 1% aren't the people who benefit from infinite cheap items, so their low use of them makes no difference. But that's beside the point. It doesn't matter if they're really a threat, only that CCP thinks they are. And this suggestion gives them an option to reduce their numbers.
ccp thinks a lot of things that are wrong and they don't have a good track record of doing the right thing by this game.
giving them options to reduce something that has no real effect on the game draws their attention away from the real problems.
pc is a real problem and holds this game back or any meaningful connection to eve.... give them some options on fixing that instead of non issues...
this game makes me sad....
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3921
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 02:11:00 -
[68] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:but bpo's don't effect the dust economy....want proof?
ancient exiles.... they make the most isk in dust right now with pc and they don't use bpo's teamplayers before them...
if ccp is really concerned about the state of the economy in dust they should fix pc and leave my effing bpo's alone....
I don't think BPOs are a threat to the economy either, but your argument is a non-sequitur. The 1% aren't the people who benefit from infinite cheap items, so their low use of them makes no difference. But that's beside the point. It doesn't matter if they're really a threat, only that CCP thinks they are. And this suggestion gives them an option to reduce their numbers. ccp thinks a lot of things that are wrong and they don't have a good track record of doing the right thing by this game. giving them options to reduce something that has no real effect on the game draws their attention away from the real problems. pc is a real problem and holds this game back or any meaningful connection to eve.... give them some options on fixing that instead of non issues...
But CCP's approach to BPOs IS an issue. Their removal from player inventories proves that. Look at all the people wanting to trade them on the forums already. What if trading them is restricted when the player market deploys?
No.
|
Seymor Krelborn
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1896
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 02:17:00 -
[69] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:but bpo's don't effect the dust economy....want proof?
ancient exiles.... they make the most isk in dust right now with pc and they don't use bpo's teamplayers before them...
if ccp is really concerned about the state of the economy in dust they should fix pc and leave my effing bpo's alone....
I don't think BPOs are a threat to the economy either, but your argument is a non-sequitur. The 1% aren't the people who benefit from infinite cheap items, so their low use of them makes no difference. But that's beside the point. It doesn't matter if they're really a threat, only that CCP thinks they are. And this suggestion gives them an option to reduce their numbers. ccp thinks a lot of things that are wrong and they don't have a good track record of doing the right thing by this game. giving them options to reduce something that has no real effect on the game draws their attention away from the real problems. pc is a real problem and holds this game back or any meaningful connection to eve.... give them some options on fixing that instead of non issues... But CCP's approach to BPOs IS an issue. Their removal from player inventories proves that. Look at all the people wanting to trade them on the forums already. What if trading them is restricted when the player market deploys?
then you demand they cut that crap out instead of offering ways for them to disenfranchise us more....
and another thing, think about this, if ccp is so afraid of bpo's why were they still giving them out with the CE and recruit rewards AFTER they removed four of them?
I think youre simply misinformed. ccp has just had so many personel changes with this game they don't know what side is up anymore nor where to take this game next and all youre doing is confusing them.
this game makes me sad....
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3921
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 02:24:00 -
[70] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:but bpo's don't effect the dust economy....want proof?
ancient exiles.... they make the most isk in dust right now with pc and they don't use bpo's teamplayers before them...
if ccp is really concerned about the state of the economy in dust they should fix pc and leave my effing bpo's alone....
I don't think BPOs are a threat to the economy either, but your argument is a non-sequitur. The 1% aren't the people who benefit from infinite cheap items, so their low use of them makes no difference. But that's beside the point. It doesn't matter if they're really a threat, only that CCP thinks they are. And this suggestion gives them an option to reduce their numbers. ccp thinks a lot of things that are wrong and they don't have a good track record of doing the right thing by this game. giving them options to reduce something that has no real effect on the game draws their attention away from the real problems. pc is a real problem and holds this game back or any meaningful connection to eve.... give them some options on fixing that instead of non issues... But CCP's approach to BPOs IS an issue. Their removal from player inventories proves that. Look at all the people wanting to trade them on the forums already. What if trading them is restricted when the player market deploys? then you demand they cut that crap out instead of offering ways for them to disenfranchise us more.... and another thing, think about this, if ccp is so afraid of bpo's why were they still giving them out with the CE and recruit rewards AFTER they removed four of them? I think youre simply misinformed. ccp has just had so many personel changes with this game they don't know what side is up anymore nor where to take this game next and all youre doing is confusing them.
How is this confusing CCP, how am I misinformed, and how would offering players something disenfranchise them?
No.
|
|
Seymor Krelborn
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1902
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 03:08:00 -
[71] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:
ancient exiles.... they make the most isk in dust right now with pc and they don't use bpo's teamplayers before them...
if ccp is really concerned about the state of the economy in dust they should fix pc and leave my effing bpo's alone....
I don't think BPOs are a threat to the economy either, but your argument is a non-sequitur. The 1% aren't the people who benefit from infinite cheap items, so their low use of them makes no difference. But that's beside the point. It doesn't matter if they're really a threat, only that CCP thinks they are. And this suggestion gives them an option to reduce their numbers. ccp thinks a lot of things that are wrong and they don't have a good track record of doing the right thing by this game. giving them options to reduce something that has no real effect on the game draws their attention away from the real problems. pc is a real problem and holds this game back or any meaningful connection to eve.... give them some options on fixing that instead of non issues... But CCP's approach to BPOs IS an issue. Their removal from player inventories proves that. Look at all the people wanting to trade them on the forums already. What if trading them is restricted when the player market deploys?
then you demand they cut that crap out instead of offering ways for them to disenfranchise us more....
and another thing, think about this, if ccp is so afraid of bpo's why were they still giving them out with the CE and recruit rewards AFTER they removed four of them?
I think youre simply misinformed. ccp has just had so many personel changes with this game they don't know what side is up anymore nor where to take this game next and all youre doing is confusing them.[/quote]
How is this confusing CCP, how am I misinformed, and how would offering players something disenfranchise them? [/quote]
your confusing them because this is a non issue yet you speak of it like ccp should be concerned about bpo's
I think youre misinformed because I don't recal ccp saying anything about them being a "threat" on that they are not working as intended... they were removed from the market so problem solved.. and you never answered my question on this note...if ccp is so afraid of bpo's why were they still giving them out with the CE and recruit rewards AFTER they removed four of them?
lastly anything other than having our bpo's untouched and free to trade as was intended when ccp sold them to us disenfranchises us.
this game makes me sad....
|
Poonmunch
Sanguis Defense Syndicate
835
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 03:34:00 -
[72] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Poonmunch wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:CCP doesn't like BPOs. They're viewed as a threat and/or imbalancing factor to the Dust economy.
First we saw them removed from sale, then we saw some forcibly removed from player inventories.
There's a conflict between CCP's distaste for these items, and our eagerness to trade them in the upcoming player market.
I think there's an option to appease both parties: Similar to weapon, and other contraband amnesties sometimes enacted by authorities, CCP could offer rewards to players who turn in their BPOs for destruction. These rewards could be lump sums of aurum or isk, or they could be bundles of FW boosters or disposable equivalents of the BPOs themselves.
The details are beside the point. What is important is that with such an act, CCP would get to minimise the effects of BPOs on Dust's economy, and we players would get to cash in on all those duplicates & unuseds that have sat in our merc cupboards for months and months.
What do you think? Is this an idea that appeals to you? I really think it'd be a great way to bridge the gap between our interests, and if it gets much support, maybe it could come to fruition. Just don't let players with BPOs trade them or sell them once the open market begins. Munch That's exactly the kind of thing I want to avoid.
Which one?
Allowing them to trade or not allowing them to trade?
Munch
Minmatar Patriot (Level 7)
Dedicated Sniper
|
Duran Lex
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
703
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 03:40:00 -
[73] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Duran Lex wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Duran Lex wrote:The value of 100 aur is 100 aur regardless of personal opinions of worth changing your perspective. And with that statement goes any legitimacy you will ever have on any discussion of economics. Out of context perhaps. But when referring to your personal opinion that, just because you "feel" that the value of the aurum was lessened by the removal of the BPO you received a refund for, doesn't mean it's fact. The value of the aurum hasn't changed because you personally[/b wouldn't spend it on something that isn't a BPO.
Hence my statement. [b]Your personal opinion of its worth doesn't change its value. That isn't out of context. You just doubled down on that context. The only value ANY currency has is the value assigned to at the point of an exchange. If this were not the case, currency would not exist at all.
Correct.
And as I've stated for the 3rd time now, your personal opinions haven't changed the value of aur nor will they ever change its value.
I would say I'm surprised you aren't comprehending this, but after continuing to read your responses in this thread.... |
Lucrezia LeGrand
Sentinels of NEW EDEN
472
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 03:45:00 -
[74] - Quote
this is still a thing? o_O
Thale groupie (not the gun, but the man).
My other car is Utena.
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3921
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 03:59:00 -
[75] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:But CCP's approach to BPOs IS an issue. Their removal from player inventories proves that. Look at all the people wanting to trade them on the forums already. What if trading them is restricted when the player market deploys? How is this confusing CCP, how am I misinformed, and how would offering players something disenfranchise them?
your confusing them because this is a non issue yet you speak of it like ccp should be concerned about bpo's
I think youre misinformed because I don't recal ccp saying anything about them being a "threat" on that they are not working as intended... they were removed from the market so problem solved.. and you never answered my question on this note...if ccp is so afraid of bpo's why were they still giving them out with the CE and recruit rewards AFTER they removed four of them?
lastly anything other than having our bpo's untouched and free to trade as was intended when ccp sold them to us disenfranchises us.[/quote]
I've never spoken like CCP should be concerned. I've said the opposite several times. All I have done is acknowledge that CCP are concerned. Be that rational or not.
An economic item not working as intended = threat to the economy. It doesn't have to be a major threat. It doesn't have to compete with the threat of PC or EVE isk. Your question is a little redundant given that BPOs were removed from the market in the first place. The fact that a few still remain available is moot.
You didn't answer my question. How does offering players something disenfranchise them? Your supposed answer was filled with caveats.
No.
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3921
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 04:00:00 -
[76] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Duran Lex wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Duran Lex wrote:The value of 100 aur is 100 aur regardless of personal opinions of worth changing your perspective. And with that statement goes any legitimacy you will ever have on any discussion of economics. Out of context perhaps. But when referring to your personal opinion that, just because you "feel" that the value of the aurum was lessened by the removal of the BPO you received a refund for, doesn't mean it's fact. The value of the aurum hasn't changed because you personally[/b wouldn't spend it on something that isn't a BPO.
Hence my statement. [b]Your personal opinion of its worth doesn't change its value. That isn't out of context. You just doubled down on that context. The only value ANY currency has is the value assigned to at the point of an exchange. If this were not the case, currency would not exist at all. Correct. And as I've stated for the 3rd time now, your personal opinions haven't changed the value of aur nor will they ever change its value. I would say I'm surprised you aren't comprehending this, but after continuing to read your responses in this thread....
Wow.
Just wow.
No.
|
Nevyn Tazinas
Company of Marcher Lords Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 04:12:00 -
[77] - Quote
Regis Blackbird wrote:
^ This is probably the core sticking point. I like my BPOs for the looks, not the free ISK it brings.
Now, the question you should ask yourself, would you accept an infinite supply of a Templar advanced or prototype suites (that look exactly like the BPO), but you had to pay an ISK (or material) cost to produce them?
This is still a BPO at that point. They have just changed how BPO's work to require an isk cost to manufacture them.
I wouldn't mind having to pay isk to utilise a BPO, assuming it's less isk than buying the same item from NPC seed. And there was a player market, so I could sell the items for a profit to everyone else without sexy looks if I wanted.
There would also have to be a time component of course so one person couldn't supply the entire market and selling the items becomes a trade off between personal use & sales.
So, reliant on a player market, BPO's requiring cost (To reflect materials) works for me. As a note, unless I can't read statistics properly, the Templar suits are actually basic suits. The Templar equipment certainly is basic. |
Lucrezia LeGrand
Sentinels of NEW EDEN
473
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 04:16:00 -
[78] - Quote
If BPO's become manufactured items that we have to pay isk to use I want them super cheap. Like militia cheap, even for my "standard" Dragonfly Suits.
Thale groupie (not the gun, but the man).
My other car is Utena.
|
Vitharr Foebane
Living Like Larry Schwag
1017
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 04:35:00 -
[79] - Quote
Nevyn Tazinas wrote:Regis Blackbird wrote:
^ This is probably the core sticking point. I like my BPOs for the looks, not the free ISK it brings.
Now, the question you should ask yourself, would you accept an infinite supply of a Templar advanced or prototype suites (that look exactly like the BPO), but you had to pay an ISK (or material) cost to produce them?
This is still a BPO at that point. They have just changed how BPO's work to require an isk cost to manufacture them. I wouldn't mind having to pay isk to utilise a BPO, assuming it's less isk than buying the same item from NPC seed. And there was a player market, so I could sell the items for a profit to everyone else without sexy looks if I wanted. There would also have to be a time component of course so one person couldn't supply the entire market and selling the items becomes a trade off between personal use & sales. So, reliant on a player market, BPO's requiring cost (To reflect materials) works for me. As a note, unless I can't read statistics properly, the Templar suits are actually basic suits. The Templar equipment certainly is basic. How DARE you call the Templar set "basic"... While they indeed use STD stats(mostly LR requires 4 less CPU) they are literally they sexiest suits(and weapons) in the game
Amarr: Sentinel V Scout V Assault IV Commando III Logistics III
I place my faith in my God, my Empress, and my Laz0r
|
Seymor Krelborn
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1910
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 04:49:00 -
[80] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:But CCP's approach to BPOs IS an issue. Their removal from player inventories proves that. Look at all the people wanting to trade them on the forums already. What if trading them is restricted when the player market deploys? How is this confusing CCP, how am I misinformed, and how would offering players something disenfranchise them? your confusing them because this is a non issue yet you speak of it like ccp should be concerned about bpo's I think youre misinformed because I don't recal ccp saying anything about them being a "threat" on that they are not working as intended... they were removed from the market so problem solved.. and you never answered my question on this note...if ccp is so afraid of bpo's why were they still giving them out with the CE and recruit rewards AFTER they removed four of them? lastly anything other than having our bpo's untouched and free to trade as was intended when ccp sold them to us disenfranchises us.
chunky munkey wrote:I've never spoken like CCP should be concerned. I've said the opposite several times. All I have done is acknowledge that CCP are concerned. Be that rational or not.
An economic item not working as intended = threat to the economy. It doesn't have to be a major threat. It doesn't have to compete with the threat of PC or EVE isk. Your question is a little redundant given that BPOs were removed from the market in the first place. The fact that a few still remain available is moot.
You didn't answer my question. How does offering players something disenfranchise them? Your supposed answer was filled with caveats.
im sorry chunky, but your replies are disjointed and your conclusions are alarmingly dim witted
I m afraid I must end this relationship....
this game makes me sad....
|
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3928
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 14:25:00 -
[81] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:chunky munkey wrote:I've never spoken like CCP should be concerned. I've said the opposite several times. All I have done is acknowledge that CCP are concerned. Be that rational or not.
An economic item not working as intended = threat to the economy. It doesn't have to be a major threat. It doesn't have to compete with the threat of PC or EVE isk. Your question is a little redundant given that BPOs were removed from the market in the first place. The fact that a few still remain available is moot.
You didn't answer my question. How does offering players something disenfranchise them? Your supposed answer was filled with caveats. im sorry chunky, but your replies are disjointed and your conclusions are alarmingly dim witted I m afraid I must end this relationship....
Right. I'm sure it has nothing to do with me relpying succinctly to each of your arguments.
No.
|
Regis Blackbird
DUST University Ivy League
159
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 15:40:00 -
[82] - Quote
Nevyn Tazinas wrote:Regis Blackbird wrote:
^ This is probably the core sticking point. I like my BPOs for the looks, not the free ISK it brings.
Now, the question you should ask yourself, would you accept an infinite supply of a Templar advanced or prototype suites (that look exactly like the BPO), but you had to pay an ISK (or material) cost to produce them?
This is still a BPO at that point. They have just changed how BPO's work to require an isk cost to manufacture them. I wouldn't mind having to pay isk to utilise a BPO, assuming it's less isk than buying the same item from NPC seed. And there was a player market, so I could sell the items for a profit to everyone else without sexy looks if I wanted. There would also have to be a time component of course so one person couldn't supply the entire market and selling the items becomes a trade off between personal use & sales. So, reliant on a player market, BPO's requiring cost (To reflect materials) works for me. As a note, unless I can't read statistics properly, the Templar suits are actually basic suits. The Templar equipment certainly is basic.
Current Templar suites are basic, that is correct.
My comment was more inclined to compensate for the "removal" (read: modification) of the current BPOs, if there is one. I.e. - BPOs suddenly carries a material cost (slightly less than market price), but stats stay the same = shitstorm on the forum about BPOs being worth less, not what I payed for, lawsuits etc etc.
Vs
- BPOs suddenly carries a material cost, but stats bumped up to advanced or proto. = probably still some whining on the forums, but suddenly you have a "permanent" sexy suite you actually could use outside of pub matches. For me that would be a fair compromise. |
CRNWLLC
Screwy Rabbit ULC
188
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 16:36:00 -
[83] - Quote
I think that ChribbaX's comparison of Dust BPOs to EVE T2 BPOs is a very good analogy--the problem mostly boils down to jealousy, and doesn't have much of an effect on the economy. Assuming manufacturing is even brought to Dust, having Dust BPOs function the same way as T2 BPOs in EVE pretty much solves everyone's problems (except the jellies). Also, I'm almost certainly not going to participate in manufacturing when/if it's available, and I'm sure the same is true for other mercs, so again, any feared, massive upset to the (as yet non-existent) economy seems a little premature.
Many people say that BPOs undermine the notion of "Risk vs. ISK". I do not think this is the case because, as other posters have mentioned, running BPOs is suboptimal for maintaining or improving one's KDR; since KDR (and WP, and possibly other numbers if CCP ever introduces more robust statistics) is also quite important to numerous players, they are inclined to run higher-tiered gear as running BPOs (ie, militia and standard level gear) definitely increases the risk of marring one's stats. It think most folks here will agree that, for the most part, the better gear a merc fits, the better the merc typically performs.
It's also worth noting that until at least the middle or end of January, the 'Exile' Assault Rifle BPO was available on the marketplace, via whatever AUR pack it came in. So, at least one BPO was available well after CCP started changing their stance on them and people started to get their feathers ruffled.
Since it does mostly seem to be an issue of jealousy, I'd say there's a few reasonable solutions. 1) What ChribbaX suggested; 2) make BPOs non-tradeable and have future events/marketplace packs where newer players can procure them (this mitigates jealousy, and since a 'Dren' AR = 'Exile' AR = 'Toxic' AR with different skins, who really cares?); 3) reinstate BPOs as normal, AUR-purchasable items, making them unusable for manufacturing or trading (this way, any Dust-side Ash Ketchums can collect 'em all and everyone feels warm fuzzies for being treated the same, regardless of when they started playing).
Or, here's an even more daring thought (but it requires CCP to provide a complete set of racial heavy weapons): since starter fits suck bwawls anyway, why not grant each merc a set of racial basic/standard level BPOs for building out whatever suits they dern well please? This would make selecting a race somewhat more significant (it determines what your free, "starter" BPOs will be), would remove the worthless starter fits from the game, and would make basic gear more relevant. If every new merc started the game with a set of racial BPOs (say, a basic suit in each size with a basic 'nade, racial light, heavy, and sidearm weapons; race-aligned tanking mods, etc.) they could mix and match, and it would make the new player experience much better, since trying to put together a fit with the starter suits is next to impossible without decent skills. Of course, all these BPOs would be available on the market, so interested parties could acquire each race's BPOs.
My other dropsuit is a Python.
|
Seymor Krelborn
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1916
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 17:59:00 -
[84] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:chunky munkey wrote:I've never spoken like CCP should be concerned. I've said the opposite several times. All I have done is acknowledge that CCP are concerned. Be that rational or not.
An economic item not working as intended = threat to the economy. It doesn't have to be a major threat. It doesn't have to compete with the threat of PC or EVE isk. Your question is a little redundant given that BPOs were removed from the market in the first place. The fact that a few still remain available is moot.
You didn't answer my question. How does offering players something disenfranchise them? Your supposed answer was filled with caveats. im sorry chunky, but your replies are disjointed and your conclusions are alarmingly dim witted I m afraid I must end this relationship.... Right. I'm sure it has nothing to do with me relpying succinctly to each of your arguments.
no it really doesn't... you have not refuted one of my points coherently, and I cant debate someone who cant follow a conversation... all the points I made are valid and I've yet to hear anything from you that makes sense disputing them.
this game makes me sad....
|
Seymor Krelborn
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1916
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 18:03:00 -
[85] - Quote
CRNWLLC wrote:I think that ChribbaX's comparison of Dust BPOs to EVE T2 BPOs is a very good analogy--the problem mostly boils down to jealousy, and doesn't have much of an effect on the economy. Assuming manufacturing is even brought to Dust, having Dust BPOs function the same way as T2 BPOs in EVE pretty much solves everyone's problems (except the jellies). Also, I'm almost certainly not going to participate in manufacturing when/if it's available, and I'm sure the same is true for other mercs, so again, any feared, massive upset to the (as yet non-existent) economy seems a little premature. Many people say that BPOs undermine the notion of "Risk vs. ISK". I do not think this is the case because, as other posters have mentioned, running BPOs is suboptimal for maintaining or improving one's KDR; since KDR (and WP, and possibly other numbers if CCP ever introduces more robust statistics) is also quite important to numerous players, they are inclined to run higher-tiered gear as running BPOs (ie, militia and standard level gear) definitely increases the risk of marring one's stats. It think most folks here will agree that, for the most part, the better gear a merc fits, the better the merc typically performs. It's also worth noting that until at least the middle or end of January, the 'Exile' Assault Rifle BPO was available on the marketplace, via whatever AUR pack it came in. So, at least one BPO was available well after CCP started changing their stance on them and people started to get their feathers ruffled. Since it does mostly seem to be an issue of jealousy, I'd say there's a few reasonable solutions. 1) What ChribbaX suggested; 2) make BPOs non-tradeable and have future events/marketplace packs where newer players can procure them (this mitigates jealousy, and since a 'Dren' AR = 'Exile' AR = 'Toxic' AR with different skins, who really cares?); 3) reinstate BPOs as normal, AUR-purchasable items, making them unusable for manufacturing or trading (this way, any Dust-side Ash Ketchums can collect 'em all and everyone feels warm fuzzies for being treated the same, regardless of when they started playing). Or, here's an even more daring thought (but it requires CCP to provide a complete set of racial heavy weapons): since starter fits suck bwawls anyway, why not grant each merc a set of racial basic/standard level BPOs for building out whatever suits they dern well please? This would make selecting a race somewhat more significant (it determines what your free, "starter" BPOs will be), would remove the worthless starter fits from the game, and would make basic gear more relevant. If every new merc started the game with a set of racial BPOs (say, a basic suit in each size with a basic 'nade, racial light, heavy, and sidearm weapons; race-aligned tanking mods, etc.) they could mix and match, and it would make the new player experience much better, since trying to put together a fit with the starter suits is next to impossible without decent skills. Of course, all these BPOs would be available on the market, so interested parties could acquire each race's BPOs.
I have said much of this in the past and agree with every word.... chunk doesn't seem to understand this, so I'm awaiting his lol reply to your sound logic.
this game makes me sad....
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3930
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:01:00 -
[86] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:I have said much of this in the past and agree with every word.... chunk doesn't seem to understand this, so I'm awaiting his lol reply to your sound logic.
Nothing said there contradicted anything I've said.
Sounds more like you're hanging around here on butthurt.
No.
|
Seymor Krelborn
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1922
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:14:00 -
[87] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:I have said much of this in the past and agree with every word.... chunk doesn't seem to understand this, so I'm awaiting his lol reply to your sound logic. Nothing said there contradicted anything I've said. Sounds more like you're hanging around here on butthurt.
my butt hurting has nothing to do with this thread....had the wife strap on last night...its hurts so good....in my butt.
this game makes me sad....
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |