Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Outlaw OneZero
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1379
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
So scouts are now the kings of EWAR, which is great, they now have a role that can really contribute to their team. There is even significant variety in how this role can contribute to team, including intel gathering, infiltration / disruption, stealth hacking, and vehicle ambushing. Again, great stuff, scouts are in the best place they've ever been.
Unfortunately, they can also fit a serious tank without a significant loss to their EWAR capability. This leads to less variety in fits and an assault class that has been outclassed.
I propose that HP modules come with an EWAR penalty. Because of the way Cal and Gal scouts are bonused, I think the following penalties make the most sense:
Armor plates should increase suit signature. You're adding more mass to your suit, it should increase the sig. This makes a player have to decide between increasing HP and maintaining a low signature. Basic plates are made from the cheapest materials and have the highest sig hit, proto are made of cutting edge materials and take the least hit. This also helps balance against the speed penalties for plates. Feroscale are made of super-light materials and incur no penalty at any level. Reactive plates have a built-in repper that generates a constant high noise level.
Below are some suggested values, (this needs some careful analysis to find the right balance):
Armor Plate Signature Penalties Basic Armor Plate -----: +5dB sig / plate Advanced Armor Plate:-+4dB sig / plate Prototype Armor Plate-: +3dB sig / plate Feroscale Plates -------: +0db sig Reactive Plates ---------: +5db sig / plate
Shield modules should reduce scan precision. The shield is generating interference with your on-suit scanners. Again Basic Extenders have the largest penalty and Prototype has the smallest.
Shield Extender Precision Penalties Basic Shield Extender ---: -5dB precision / module Adv Shield Extender ------: -4dB precision / module Proto Shield Extender ----: -3dB precision / module
These changes should create more fitting decisions and increase the use of non-HP high/low slot modules. It should also let assaults reclaim their position as scouts now have to lose signature or precision in order to fit assault levels of HP. |
Henrietta Unknown
Sooper Speshul Ponee Fors Dropsuit Samurai
91
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
I might be wrong, but I heard that by EVE lore, shield extenders lead to a higher profile signature, not armor. |
Django Quik
Dust2Dust.
2663
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
Knowing anything about the lore of the Eve universe, this entire post is contradictory to the way things work.
Shields are fine. Plates are bad because regular ones add far too much HP. That is all.
Brick tanking is not a scout problem - it is an everyone problem and needs to be solved for the entire game, not just scouts.
Dedicated sidearm scout - Watch out for that headshot
Scout community is the nuts
|
Aikuchi Tomaru
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2137
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
Nerfing armor even more? Yeah, no.
Shield Extenders is what increases your signature.
Sign up for Caldari FW and defeat the evil Gallente Overlords!
|
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster Lokun Listamenn
2945
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
Henrietta Unknown wrote:I might be wrong, but I heard that by EVE lore, shield extenders lead to a higher profile signature, not armor. Yeah, I think plates should make you a tad bit slower.
"I do agree with you there though. shudders"
-Arkena Wyrnspire
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
4801
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
Outlaw OneZero wrote:Unfortunately, they can also fit a serious tank without a significant loss to their EWAR capability. This leads to less variety in fits and an assault class that has been outclassed. Considering this is completely wrong and Scouts HAVE to place a lot of importance in choosing between stacking EWAR modules or stacking tanking modules, I shouldn't really need to address the rest of your post, but because it does things so backwards, I'm going to anyway...
Quote:I propose that HP modules come with an EWAR penalty. Because of the way Cal and Gal scouts are bonused, I think the following penalties make the most sense: Uhhhh... lolwut?
Quote:Armor plates should increase suit signature. You're adding more mass to your suit, it should increase the sig. This makes a player have to decide between increasing HP and maintaining a low signature. Basic plates are made from the cheapest materials and have the highest sig hit, proto are made of cutting edge materials and take the least hit. This also helps balance against the speed penalties for plates. Feroscale are made of super-light materials and incur no penalty at any level. Reactive plates have a built-in repper that generates a constant high noise level. So you're saying that a suit that's designed for armour tanking and profile signature should LOSE one advantage in order to capitalise on the other? And the suit that's designed for scanning capabilities and shield tanking should give up one of its primary roles if it wants to focus more heavily on the other?
If - and that would be a massive "if" - adding any penalties to these modules was a good idea in the first place, then they should be the exact opposite of what you're proposing FOR THE EXACT REASONS YOU'RE CLAIMING TO BE THINKING OF.
I hope you just typed the whole thing up the wrong way around by mistake or something, because if not... wow. |
Outlaw OneZero
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1379
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:31:00 -
[7] - Quote
Henrietta Unknown wrote:I might be wrong, but I heard that by EVE lore, shield extenders lead to a higher profile signature, not armor.
I understand that this isn't EVE lore, the problem is that CCP produced a sig bonus for the scout that can stack the most plates. If it doesn't cost them sig to brick tank, why wouldn't you do it? |
Outlaw OneZero
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1379
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:33:00 -
[8] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Outlaw OneZero wrote:Unfortunately, they can also fit a serious tank without a significant loss to their EWAR capability. This leads to less variety in fits and an assault class that has been outclassed. Considering this is completely wrong and Scouts HAVE to place a lot of importance in choosing between stacking EWAR modules or stacking tanking modules, I shouldn't really need to address the rest of your post, but because it does things so backwards, I'm going to anyway... Quote:I propose that HP modules come with an EWAR penalty. Because of the way Cal and Gal scouts are bonused, I think the following penalties make the most sense: Uhhhh... lolwut? Quote:Armor plates should increase suit signature. You're adding more mass to your suit, it should increase the sig. This makes a player have to decide between increasing HP and maintaining a low signature. Basic plates are made from the cheapest materials and have the highest sig hit, proto are made of cutting edge materials and take the least hit. This also helps balance against the speed penalties for plates. Feroscale are made of super-light materials and incur no penalty at any level. Reactive plates have a built-in repper that generates a constant high noise level. So you're saying that a suit that's designed for armour tanking and profile signature should LOSE one advantage in order to capitalise on the other? And the suit that's designed for scanning capabilities and shield tanking should give up one of its primary roles if it wants to focus more heavily on the other? If - and that would be a massive "if" - adding any penalties to these modules was a good idea in the first place, then they should be the exact opposite of what you're proposing FOR THE EXACT REASONS YOU'RE CLAIMING TO BE THINKING OF. I hope you just typed the whole thing up the wrong way around by mistake or something, because if not... wow.
Yes a scout shouldn't be able to stack more armor than an assualt, have a lower sig, be faster, with a smaller hitbox...
These penalties would address that.
|
Django Quik
Dust2Dust.
2667
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
Outlaw OneZero wrote:Henrietta Unknown wrote:I might be wrong, but I heard that by EVE lore, shield extenders lead to a higher profile signature, not armor. I understand that this isn't EVE lore, the problem is that CCP produced a sig bonus for the scout that can stack the most plates. If it doesn't cost them sig to brick tank, why wouldn't you do it? Actually, gallente scouts do have to sacrifice 'sig' to armour tank because profile dampeners are low slots, same as armor mods.
In order to still avoid caldari scouts and gallente logis, gallente scouts still have to fit at least one dampener.
Dedicated sidearm scout - Watch out for that headshot
Scout community is the nuts
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
4803
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
Outlaw OneZero wrote:Yes a scout shouldn't be able to stack more armor than an assualt, have a lower sig, be faster, with a smaller hitbox... EVERY Assault has better baseline HP and good enough slot layout and capacity to out-tank their Scout equivalents.
Prove me wrong.
(also, I've already said elsewhere, but the current state of the Assault suit is mildly underpowered and needs a buff) |
|
Outlaw OneZero
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1381
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:43:00 -
[11] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Outlaw OneZero wrote:Henrietta Unknown wrote:I might be wrong, but I heard that by EVE lore, shield extenders lead to a higher profile signature, not armor. I understand that this isn't EVE lore, the problem is that CCP produced a sig bonus for the scout that can stack the most plates. If it doesn't cost them sig to brick tank, why wouldn't you do it? Actually, gallente scouts do have to sacrifice 'sig' to armour tank because profile dampeners are low slots, same as armor mods. In order to still avoid caldari scouts and gallente logis, gallente scouts still have to fit at least one dampener.
1 WHOLE LOW SLOT? OH NOES!!! HOW WILL I EVER FIT 4 PLATES NOW!?!? |
Harpyja
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1455
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:43:00 -
[12] - Quote
Henrietta Unknown wrote:I might be wrong, but I heard that by EVE lore, shield extenders lead to a higher profile signature, not armor. He uses signature as in detectability. In EVE, signature is your ship's size, which is akin to the hitbox in Dust. I always thought that the penalty for shield extenders in Dust should have been an increased hitbox.
It makes perfect sense that adding bulky armor plates increases the dB that your suit produces, while shield extenders interfere with your scan precision.
"By His light, and His will"
- The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
|
buzzzzzzz killllllllll
TRA1LBLAZERS
400
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:47:00 -
[13] - Quote
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Nerfing armor even more? Yeah, no.
Shield Extenders is what increases your signature. Plates make you slower. This is the way it's in Eve Online.
what the **** do you mean nerfing armor even more? armor is a thousand times better than shields in this game, its not ******* eve online, and armor barely slows you down. btw, i have level 5 plates, reppers, and armor upgrades, so i would be biased against shields, not for them ( i also am an amarr heavy, so no im not for shields because my race is caldari)
Dedicated heavy through the hard times, still supporter of A FULL 1.8 respec and MOAR HEAVY WEAPONS!
|
Django Quik
Dust2Dust.
2667
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:51:00 -
[14] - Quote
Outlaw OneZero wrote:Django Quik wrote:Outlaw OneZero wrote:Henrietta Unknown wrote:I might be wrong, but I heard that by EVE lore, shield extenders lead to a higher profile signature, not armor. I understand that this isn't EVE lore, the problem is that CCP produced a sig bonus for the scout that can stack the most plates. If it doesn't cost them sig to brick tank, why wouldn't you do it? Actually, gallente scouts do have to sacrifice 'sig' to armour tank because profile dampeners are low slots, same as armor mods. In order to still avoid caldari scouts and gallente logis, gallente scouts still have to fit at least one dampener. 1 WHOLE LOW SLOT? OH NOES!!! HOW WILL I EVER FIT 4 PLATES NOW!?!? Well, you could still fit 3 complex plates. 3x 135 = 405hp. That's roughly 1 second of fire from many rifles. OMG so tanked it will never die.
Dedicated sidearm scout - Watch out for that headshot
Scout community is the nuts
|
Outlaw OneZero
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1381
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:56:00 -
[15] - Quote
Django Quik wrote: Well, you could still fit 3 complex plates. 3x 135 = 405hp. That's roughly 1 second of fire from many rifles. OMG so tanked it will never die.
That's over 600 armor on a skilled proto Gal scout, that is also invisible to all EWAR. |
Django Quik
Dust2Dust.
2667
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:57:00 -
[16] - Quote
Look, my point is that you are trying to balance tanking specifically in regards to scouts, which is the wrong way to do it. You need to be balancing tanking with regards to the entire game, otherwise you'll just continue to be tinkering with symptoms and not causes.
Scout tanking is a symptom of brick tanking being the best thing to do to any suit. The top scouts were doing this way before 1.8 came along but now because there are so many more, suddenly they're a problem! Brick tanking in general needs to be taken down a peg and shields aren't too bad (apart from really being the only worthwhile high slot mod), so it's really a problem with regular armor plating. Reduce armor plate hp to a level where running it instead of ewar or biotics or even reps is not the obvious best choice. That's balance. Not make up some silly class specific penalty to stop one role from having any diversity beyond what you or anyone else thinks should be the only way to fit it.
Dedicated sidearm scout - Watch out for that headshot
Scout community is the nuts
|
Django Quik
Dust2Dust.
2667
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:58:00 -
[17] - Quote
Outlaw OneZero wrote:Django Quik wrote: Well, you could still fit 3 complex plates. 3x 135 = 405hp. That's roughly 1 second of fire from many rifles. OMG so tanked it will never die.
That's over 600 armor on a skilled proto Gal scout, that is also invisible to all EWAR. Just under 600 armor actually but nonetheless 1.5 seconds of fire. Big woop.
Dedicated sidearm scout - Watch out for that headshot
Scout community is the nuts
|
Outlaw OneZero
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1382
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 15:04:00 -
[18] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Look, my point is that you are trying to balance tanking specifically in regards to scouts, which is the wrong way to do it. You need to be balancing tanking with regards to the entire game, otherwise you'll just continue to be tinkering with symptoms and not causes.
Scout tanking is a symptom of brick tanking being the best thing to do to any suit. The top scouts were doing this way before 1.8 came along but now because there are so many more, suddenly they're a problem! Brick tanking in general needs to be taken down a peg and shields aren't too bad (apart from really being the only worthwhile high slot mod), so it's really a problem with regular armor plating. Reduce armor plate hp to a level where running it instead of ewar or biotics or even reps is not the obvious best choice. That's balance. Not make up some silly class specific penalty to stop one role from having any diversity beyond what you or anyone else thinks should be the only way to fit it.
You are of course correct. My mistake is in trying to implement a small change that would help bring about more balance. The problem is greater than a small change will fix however. The problem is and always has been that modules other than HP modules are not useful enough (for the most part) to warrant using something else. Particularly now that damage mods are nearly useless. |
Yan Darn
Science For Death
479
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 15:14:00 -
[19] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Look, my point is that you are trying to balance tanking specifically in regards to scouts, which is the wrong way to do it. You need to be balancing tanking with regards to the entire game, otherwise you'll just continue to be tinkering with symptoms and not causes.
Scout tanking is a symptom of brick tanking being the best thing to do to any suit. The top scouts were doing this way before 1.8 came along but now because there are so many more, suddenly they're a problem! Brick tanking in general needs to be taken down a peg and shields aren't too bad (apart from really being the only worthwhile high slot mod), so it's really a problem with regular armor plating. Reduce armor plate hp to a level where running it instead of ewar or biotics or even reps is not the obvious best choice. That's balance. Not make up some silly class specific penalty to stop one role from having any diversity beyond what you or anyone else thinks should be the only way to fit it.
^
Sorry, I'm tired of having to type the same thing in every nerf scout thread I see.
The Ghost of Bravo
|
xSir Campsalotx
G0DS AM0NG MEN D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
185
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 15:17:00 -
[20] - Quote
Under? max skill makes base armor 163 +445.5= 608.5 + passive shield life of 87=695.5 + (2x 72.6) shield extenders =840.7 double dampened, passive scan range of 37.5m, small hitbox, 2 equipments, easy cloak fit...needless to say 840.7 is nothing to scoff at especially when it's nearly unscannable and can go invisible.
G0DS AM0NG MEN Director
1.8 is going to be Heavy 514 they said... Looking around all I see are twig men
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |