DUST Search - CCP PLEASE REMOVE TANKS FROM AMBUSH

el OPERATOR wrote:

SALH wrote:

Or give us ambush without tanks. You have ambush oms, ambush, why not infantry ambush. Most players would agree that tanks are ruining ambush. Please CCP make a infantry vs infantry mode. I know if this happen players would be happy, but the down side is that no one would hardly play the ambush modes with tanks, but tankers. CCP look at the leaderboards those at the top are majority tankers with unbeleivable KDR"S I think I seen some one with a 1009.0 KDR that's the highest. Come on CCP that is rediculous. Players like me support your game and spend money on aur to see the game develope in the right direction. I enjoy playing but I really thought 1.8 would have been awesome.

No. At risk of sounding like some of the more vociferous EVElings in here, HTFU. DUST is all about the WARFARE, ie You war, You pay. It isn't WARFAIR, ie You war, You do it from an even field. Learn some AV skills, or learn to keep your head down and stay the f out of the way. Maybe, if you want to focus on infantry, try covering the backs of anyone you see running AV since they're the suicidal few who are covering your back against those tanks.

inb4FUQQ- I agree tanks are OP vs. Inf (but they're TANKS) , since most AV (proxes and swarms especially) are generally UP, agree with the hardener nerf and the total vehicle on-field limits recently enacted. I also agree a huge chunk of the DUST514 population cry too hard over dumb ****.

If you want to train AV tactics without sacrificing your precious kdr here, hate to say it but, go do a couple hundred hours in BF3 or 4. Our tanks are actually easier in a lot of ways than those over there.

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
SALH Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 6	Posted - 2014.03.29 16:45:00 - [1] - Quote Or give us ambush without tanks. You have ambush oms, ambush, why not infantry ambush. Most players would agree that tanks are ruining ambush. Please CCP make a infantry vs infantry mode. I know if this happen players would be happy, but the down side is that no one would hardly play the ambush modes with tanks, but tankers. CCP look at the leaderboards those at the top are majority tankers with unbeleivable KDR"S I think I seen some one with a 1009.0 KDR that's the highest. Come on CCP that is rediculous. Players like me support your game and spend money on aur to see the game develope in the right direction. I enjoy playing but I really thought 1.8 would have been awesome.
waistr DEAD-MEN-WALKING 132	Posted - 2014.03.29 17:09:00 - [2] - Quote Fine.. have it your way I'm packing up my forge gun and going home
Forever ETC 703rd Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive 179	Posted - 2014.03.29 17:17:00 - [3] - Quote Make a new game mode, called onslaught. 150 clones, only supply depots, 15 min, and no vehicles. This would only be fought on city sockets and their would be a read line 100m from around the city Well, time to go Commando. Fill the Ranks at 703rd. Love,Hate, and everything in between.- ETC 2013 THIS IS AMARR!!!
Zaaeed Massani RisingSuns 67	Posted - 2014.03.29 17:19:00 - [4] - Quote Forever ETC wrote: Make a new game mode, called onslaught. 150 clones, only supply depots, 15 min, and no vehicles. This would only be fought on city sockets and their would be a read line 100m from around the city +1
Michael-J-Fox Richards Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 138	Posted - 2014.03.29 17:21:00 - [5] - Quote dont use the word please, use caps, be mean, and post the same thing over and over again and it might actually come true i fought in WW2, viet nam and in near future wars involving robots all in one lifetime just like MGS and COD characters!
NextDark Knight Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 332	Posted - 2014.03.29 17:28:00 - [6] - Quote Forever ETC wrote: Make a new game mode, called onslaught. 150 clones, only supply depots, 15 min, and no vehicles. This would only be fought on city sockets and their would be a red line 100m from around the city Or instead of red line just hundreds of turrets that never miss the target.. Forge Changes needed Officer Splash 3.0, Proto 2.7 Advanced 2.5 Standard 2.1. Original ROF needs to return!
Joel II X Dah Gods O Bacon 2071	Posted - 2014.03.29 17:33:00 - [7] - Quote waistr wrote: Fine.. have it your way I'm packing up my forge gun and going home This isn't Burger King. You can't have it your way.
Forever ETC 703rd Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive 183	Posted - 2014.03.29 18:00:00 - [8] - Quote I have put my idea in the features forum, check it out for more info. Well, time to go Commando. Fill the Ranks at 703rd. Love,Hate, and everything in between.- ETC 2013 THIS IS AMARR!!!
el OPERATOR Capital Acquisitions LLC Dirt Nap Squad. 103	Posted - 2014.03.29 18:11:00 - [9] - Quote SALH wrote: Or give us ambush without tanks. You have ambush oms, ambush, why not infantry ambush. Most players would agree that tanks are ruining ambush. Please CCP make a infantry vs infantry mode. I know if this happen players would be happy, but the down side is that no one would hardly play the ambush modes with tanks, but tankers. CCP look at the leaderboards those at the top are majority tankers with unbeleivable KDR"S I think I seen some one with a 1009.0 KDR that's the highest. Come on CCP that is rediculous. Players like me support your game and spend money on aur to see the game develope in the right direction. I enjoy playing but I really thought 1.8 would have been awesome. No. At risk of sounding like some of the more vociferous EVElings in here, HTFU. DUST is all about the WARFARE, ie You war, You pay. It isn't WARFAIR, ie You war, You do it from an even field. Learn some AV skills, or learn to keep your head down and stay the f out of the way. Maybe, if you want to focus on infantry, try covering the backs of anyone you see running AV since they're the suicidal few who are covering your back against those tanks. inb4FUQQ- I agree tanks are OP vs. Inf (but they're TANKS) , since most AV (proxes and swarms especially) are generally UP, agree with the hardener nerf and the total vehicle on-field limits recently enacted. I also agree a huge chunk of the infantry population cry too hard over dumb ****. If you want to train AV tactics without sacrificing your precious kdr here, hate to say it but, go do a couple hundred hours in BF3 or 4. Our tanks are actually easier in a lot of ways than those over there. Open-Beta Vet. Drunk Night Tree Burner. This is my Main and Original.
Athena Sentinel SOE Knights Templar 184	Posted - 2014.03.29 18:29:00 - [10] - Quote Or another map type that plays like that. A huge map where you could only have dropship would rock. Maybe some jungle cover....

el OPERATOR Capital Acquisitions LLC Dirt Nap Squad. 103	Posted - 2014.03.29 18:33:00 - [11] - Quote Athena Sentinel wrote: Or another map type that plays like that. A huge map where you could only have dropship would rock. Maybe some jungle cover.... This I agree with. Map design that effectively promotes certain tactics. Although such maps would be, for all intents and purposes, "unbalanced". But again, Warfare not Warfair. Open-Beta Vet. Drunk Night Tree Burner. This is my Main and Original.
KalOfTheRathi Nec Tributis 1069	Posted - 2014.03.29 18:37:00 - [12] - Quote You just got a gift of two tanks for each team. So enjoy the rush of it appearing like matchmaking. Cause Dust514 does not have matchmaking. Tanks, DS, LAVs and PROTO are available everywhere all the time. Except for those that were too slow getting their tank request in. And so it goes.
SALH Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 8	Posted - 2014.03.29 19:39:00 - [13] - Quote el OPERATOR wrote: SALH wrote: Or give us ambush without tanks. You have ambush oms, ambush, why not infantry ambush. Most players would agree that tanks are ruining ambush. Please CCP make a infantry vs infantry mode. I know if this happen players would be happy, but the down side is that no one would hardly play the ambush modes with tanks, but tankers. CCP look at the leaderboards those at the top are majority tankers with unbeleivable KDR"S I think I seen some one with a 1009.0 KDR that's the highest. Come on CCP that is rediculous. Players like me support your game and spend money on aur to see the game develope in the right direction. I enjoy playing but I really thought 1.8 would have been awesome. No. At risk of sounding like some of the more vociferous EVElings in here, HTFU. DUST is all about the WARFARE, ie You war, You pay. It isn't WARFAIR, ie You war, You do it from an even field. Learn some AV skills, or learn to keep your head down and stay the f out of the way. Maybe, if you want to focus on infantry, try covering the backs of anyone you see running AV since they're the suicidal few who are covering your back against those tanks. inb4FUQQ- I agree tanks are OP vs. Inf (but they're TANKS) , since most AV (proxes and swarms especially) are generally UP, agree with the hardener nerf and the total vehicle on-field limits recently enacted. I also agree a huge chunk of the DUST514 population cry too hard over dumb ****. If you want to train AV tactics without sacrificing your precious kdr here, hate to say it but, go do a couple hundred hours in BF3 or 4. Our tanks are actually easier in a lot of ways than those over there. I'm not worried about my kdr. Tanks are way more balanced in battlefield than dust 514, so there is no comparison. If you don't like complaints about the game then why bother sticking your nose in the conversation. It's obvious CCP wants to here them as well, because they are always nerfing something that makes even you happy, Av's aint shyt . Half the time scouts with their new cloaks are too busy running around with remote explosives blowing up infantry instead of useing it to blow up tanks.
SALH Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 8	Posted - 2014.03.29 19:41:00 - [14] - Quote waistr wrote: Fine.. have it your way I'm packing up my forge gun and going home Fine. and don't bring that some timeing ass peice of shyt back until it's fixed.
el OPERATOR Capital Acquisitions LLC Dirt Nap Squad. 104	Posted - 2014.03.29 19:54:00 - [15] - Quote Go get your OP militia tank and I'll go get my UP AV fit and we can compare who and what ain't ****. Is BF a better balance between infantry and vehicles? In some ways. Are troopers in BF tactically more effective in dealing with vehicles than most troops in here? In most ways yes. And as long as your proposing sweeping changes to the same game/modes/matches as I am playingI will continue to be a part of the discussion whether you like it, agree or not. If that doesn't work for you, then I'm sorry open forums are too OP for you to handle. Open-Beta Vet. Drunk Night Tree Burner. This is my Main and Original.
Michael Arck Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu Lokun Listamenn 3790	Posted - 2014.03.29 19:56:00 - [16] - Quote No. I'm not a tanker but I don't vehicles removed from ambush. Too much of them are annoying but at its current state, its pretty manageable. Stop running around in open fields and playing this game like its COD. Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Are you OUKH?
waistr DEAD-MEN-WALKING 133	Posted - 2014.03.29 19:58:00 - [17] - Quote SALH wrote: waistr wrote: Fine.. have it your way I'm packing up my forge gun and going home Fine. and don't bring that some timeing ass peice of shyt back until it's fixed. TOUCH+ë
SALH Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 8	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:08:00 - [18] - Quote el OPERATOR wrote: Go get your OP militia tank and I'll go get my UP AV fit and we can compare who and what ain't ****. Is BF a better balance between infantry and vehicles? In some ways. Are troopers in BF tactically more effective in dealing with vehicles than most troops in here? In most ways yes. And as long as your proposing sweeping changes to the same game/modes/matches as I am playing I will continue to be a part of the discussion whether you like it, agree or not. If that doesn't work for you, then I'm sorry open forums are too OP for you to handle. It seems it may be OP for you. Like I suggest CCP PLEASE TAKE THE TANKS OUT OF AMBUSH GL, HF o7! NOSEY
Harpyja Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1432	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:13:00 - [19] - Quote Infantry cries to lower tank limits. CCP lowers vehicle limit to two. Infantry remains unhappy, cries for the entire removal of tanks. This is why we can't have good things and balance. "By His light, and His will" - The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
el OPERATOR Capital Acquisitions LLC Dirt Nap Squad. 105	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:13:00 - [20] - Quote SALH wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Go get your OP militia tank and I'll go get my UP AV fit and we can compare who and what ain't ****. Is BF a better balance between infantry and vehicles? In some ways. Are troopers in BF tactically more effective in dealing with vehicles than most troops in here? In most ways yes. And as long as your proposing sweeping changes to the same game/modes/matches as I am playing I will continue to be a part of the discussion whether you like it, agree or not. If that doesn't work for you, then I'm sorry open forums are too OP for you to handle. It seems it may be OP for you. Like I suggest CCP PLEASE TAKE THE TANKS OUT OF AMBUSH GL, HF o7! NOSEY Yeah, they're OP against stupid. Which is why I effectively solo them often and have yet to start a thread pleading to CCP to exclude them. GL,HF o7, TREEEEAAAACK! Open-Beta Vet. Drunk Night Tree Burner. This is my Main and Original.

BrownEye1129 Death In Xcess Corporation 244	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:14:00 - [21] - Quote How many of these threads are there? Limiting the vehicle count to 2 isn't enough for you QQs? A playstyle should not be banned from any mode. LOL "Easy Mode" Logi QQ
SALH Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 8	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:17:00 - [22] - Quote BrownEye1129 wrote: How many of these threads are there? Limiting the vehicle count to 2 isn't enough for you QQs? A playstyle should not be banned from any mode. It should from this one.
Harpyja Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1432	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:17:00 - [23] - Quote Forever ETC wrote: Make a new game mode, called onslaught. 150 clones, only supply depots, 15 min, and no vehicles. This would only be fought on city sockets and their would be a red line 100m from around the city. Also spawns would be from opposite sides of the city. 3 Supply Depots, 2 in the outside for each team and one in the center of the city. There used to be a similar game mode where the ground spawns and redlines were right outside city sockets with lots of installations. Vehicles were still allowed. But it got pulled out of rotation as players didn't enjoy having to run the distance after respawning. "By His light, and His will" - The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
bamboo x Eternal Beings Proficiency V. 534	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:17:00 - [24] - Quote The answer isn't to remove content. It's to add more content. B.D. Wong AKA Dr. Wu returns to Jurassic Park sequel
SALH Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 8	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:19:00 - [25] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Infantry cries to lower tank limits. CCP lowers vehicle limit to two. Infantry remains unhappy, cries for the entire removal of tanks. This is why we can't have good things and balance. When was it ever balanced?
Forever ETC 703rd Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive 190	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:20:00 - [26] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Forever ETC wrote: Make a new game mode, called onslaught. 150 clones, only supply depots, 15 min, and no vehicles. This would only be fought on city sockets and their would be a red line 100m from around the city. Also spawns would be from opposite sides of the city. 3 Supply Depots, 2 in the outside for each team and one in the center of the city. There used to be a similar game mode where the ground spawns and redlines were right outside city sockets with lots of installations. Vehicles were still allowed. But it got pulled out of rotation as players didn't enjoy having to run the distance after respawning. I have explained this in the Features forum, please give feedback there. Well, time to go Commando. Fill the Ranks at 703rd. Love,Hate, and everything in between.- ETC 2013 THIS IS AMARR!!!
SALH Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 8	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:21:00 - [27] - Quote el OPERATOR wrote: SALH wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Go get your OP militia tank and I'll go get my UP AV fit and we can compare who and what ain't ****. Is BF a better balance between infantry and vehicles? In some ways. Are troopers in BF tactically more effective in dealing with vehicles than most troops in here? In most ways yes. And as long as your proposing sweeping changes to the same game/modes/matches as I am playing I will continue to be a part of the discussion whether you like it, agree or not. If that doesn't work for you, then I'm sorry open forums are too OP for you to handle. It seems it may be OP for you. Like I suggest CCP PLEASE TAKE THE TANKS OUT OF AMBUSH GL, HF o7! NOSEY Yeah, they're OP against stupid. Which is why I effectively solo them often and have yet to start a thread pleading to CCP to exclude them. GL,HF o7, TREEEEAAAACK! How cute
el OPERATOR Capital Acquisitions LLC Dirt Nap Squad. 106	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:30:00 - [28] - Quote What can I say? Learing to fight tanks instead of constantly qqing about tanks is bringing sexy back. Open-Beta Vet. Drunk Night Tree Burner. This is my Main and Original.
neausea 1987 R 0 N 1 N 81	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:32:00 - [29] - Quote the fact that there is a two vehicle limit is awesome,and i never had a problem with tanks anyway. step 1 if there is a tank blow it up/ step two if you cant destroy it up avoid it. i run scout ( not the fake fotm kind) and recently started using the heavy class ( because i finally have my minmitar fatty) and i see no problem with the way it is now. plus they will have an infantry only game mode when P v E comes out. (Gò»°Gûí°n+ëGò»n+¦ Gö+GöüGö+ watches a scout activate cloak and laughes, i can still see you dummy.
SALH Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 8	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:36:00 - [30] - Quote neausea 1987 wrote: the fact that there is a two vehicle limit is awesome,and i never had a problem with tanks anyway. step 1 if there is a tank blow it up/ step two if you cant destroy it up avoid it. i run scout ( not the fake fotm kind) and recently started using the heavy class ( because i finally have my minmitar fatty) and i see no problem with the way it is now. plus they will have an infantry only game mode when P v E comes out. Infantry only? That sounds wonderful. Just tired of being uplinked trapped by tanks.

el OPERATOR Capital Acquisitions LLC Dirt Nap Squad. 106	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:45:00 - [31] - Quote SALH wrote: Infantry only? That sounds wonderful. Just tired of being uplinked trapped by tanks. coughSmart deploy sucking is a totally different issue than that tanks need to be removedcough Open-Beta Vet. Drunk Night Tree Burner. This is my Main and Original.
Cyzad4 Blackfish Corp. 227	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:46:00 - [32] - Quote Forever ETC wrote: Make a new game mode, called onslaught. 150 clones, only supply depots, 15 min, and no vehicles. This would only be fought on city sockets and their would be a red line 100m from around the city. Also spawns would be from opposite sides of the city. 3 Supply Depots, 2 in the outside for each team and one in the center of the city. ^THIS^ **** right here has to happen +10 ... I'll owe you 9 more Welcome to you're "DOOM"
Harpyja Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1432	Posted - 2014.03.29 20:57:00 - [33] - Quote el OPERATOR wrote: SALH wrote: Infantry only? That sounds wonderful. Just tired of being uplinked trapped by tanks. coughSmart deploy sucking is a totally different issue than that tanks need to be removedcough Also the stupidity of some infantry to keep spawning at the same location when they know a tank is going to kill them in a few seconds. "By His light, and His will" - The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
deepfried salad gilliam Sanguine Knights 574	Posted - 2014.03.29 21:01:00 - [34] - Quote if you want to have maps that are very much anti tank sure but to completely remove them no and by anti tank maps i mean lots of ally ways and buildings to hide in and wait for tank to pass and hit them when there not looking or hit run through building hit from another side etc make it so there at a complete disadvantage but dont remove them Module effectiveness for suits
SALH Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 8	Posted - 2014.03.29 21:02:00 - [35] - Quote el OPERATOR wrote: SALH wrote: Infantry only? That sounds wonderful. Just tired of being uplinked trapped by tanks. coughSmart deploy sucking is a totally different issue than that tanks need to be removedcough Atleast untill they get the smart deployment fixed it's been broke since day one. for some reson i have this issue most of the time ,and tanks are always there.
SALH Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 8	Posted - 2014.03.29 21:05:00 - [36] - Quote Harpyja wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: SALH wrote: Infantry only? That sounds wonderful. Just tired of being uplinked trapped by tanks. coughSmart deploy sucking is a totally different issue than that tanks need to be removedcough Also the stupidity of some infantry to keep spawning at the same location when they know a tank is going to kill them in a few seconds. I'm not stupid. Sometimes you have no choice but to spawn if you want to get the isk at the end of the round. Wait to long and the game automatically kick you out.
SALH Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 8	Posted - 2014.03.29 21:11:00 - [37] - Quote deepfried salad gilliam wrote: if you want to have maps that are very much anti tank sure but to completely remove them no and by anti tank maps i mean lots of ally ways and buildings to hide in and wait for tank to pass and hit them when there not looking or hit run through building hit from another side etc make it so there at a complete disadvantage but dont remove them If they were at a total disadvantage players then would not use tanks.
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 9037	Posted - 2014.03.29 21:31:00 - [38] - Quote SALH wrote: Or give us ambush without tanks. You have ambush oms, ambush, why not infantry ambush. Most players would agree that tanks are ruining ambush. Please CCP make a infantry vs infantry mode. I know if this happen players would be happy, but the down side is that no one would hardly play the ambush modes with tanks, but tankers. CCP look at the leaderboards those at the top are majority tankers with unbeleivable KDR"S I think I seen some one with a 1009.0 KDR that's the highest. Come on CCP that is rediculous. Players like me support your game and spend money on aur to see the game develope in the right direction. I enjoy playing but I really thought 1.8 would have been awesome. I'm a tanker.....I wish to play in ambush.... I've probably spent more money on this game that you every will.... does that make my opinion more valid? NOPE! Ambush is not Infantry's little play ground or safe space where they can farm themselves stupid and get their own KD's bumped up. "Get thine Swag out of my face! Next you'll be writing #YOLOswagforJamyl in all your posts!" -Dagger Two
Harpyja Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1432	Posted - 2014.03.29 21:46:00 - [39] - Quote SALH wrote: Harpyja wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: SALH wrote: Infantry only? That sounds wonderful. Just tired of being uplinked trapped by tanks. coughSmart deploy sucking is a totally different issue than that tanks need to be removedcough Also the stupidity of some infantry to keep spawning at the same location when they know a tank is going to kill them in a few seconds. I'm not stupid. Sometimes you have no choice but to spawn if you want to get the isk at the end of the round. Wait to long and the game automatically kick you out. I was referring to those that spawn at uplinks and CRUs. Smart deploy itself can be rather rage-enducing "By His light, and His will" - The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
Patrick57 Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 6367	Posted - 2014.03.29 21:48:00 - [40] - Quote 1009 KDR? Also, why are you in my corp?

SALH Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 8	Posted - 2014.03.29 21:50:00 - [41] - Quote Patrick57 wrote: 1009 KDR? Also, why are you in my corp? Lets play
SALH Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 8	Posted - 2014.03.29 21:58:00 - [42] - Quote Patrick57 wrote: 1009 KDR? Also, why are you in my corp? Patrick 57 I think I seen your name on youtube. HOLD FAST KEEP TIGHT BE SWIFT SYNDICATE! LOL
Rusty Shallows 1320	Posted - 2014.03.29 22:33:00 - [43] - Quote el OPERATOR wrote: snip inb4FUQQ- I agree tanks are OP vs. Inf (but they're TANKS) , since most AV (proxes and swarms especially) are generally UP, agree with the hardener nerf and the total vehicle on-field limits recently enacted. I also agree a huge chunk of the DUST514 population cry too hard over dumb ***. If you want to train AV tactics without sacrificing your precious kdr here, hate to say it but, go do a couple hundred hours in BF3 or 4. Our tanks are actually easier in a lot of ways than those over there. Your in-block is late by a year. We've had request for no HAVs in Ambush since Chromosome. These posts are classic and still enjoyable to read. Forums > Game: So here is a cookie and a Like. Please keep posting. Bwahahahahahahahahahaha!* >>> GòÜ(GÇóGîéGÇó)Gò¥ >>>
Forever ETC 703rd Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive 191	Posted - 2014.03.29 22:44:00 - [44] - Quote Cyzad4 wrote: Forever ETC wrote: Make a new game mode, called onslaught. 150 clones, only supply depots, 15 min, and no vehicles. This would only be fought on city sockets and their would be a red line 100m from around the city. Also spawns would be from opposite sides of the city. 3 Supply Depots, 2 in the outside for each team and one in the center of the city. ^THIS^ **** right here has to happen +10 ... I'll owe you 9 more You can pay me back by supporting me in the Features Forum in the thread New Gamemode: Onslaught Well, time to go Commando. Fill the Ranks at 703rd. Love,Hate, and everything in between.- ETC 2013 THIS IS AMARR!!!
el OPERATOR Capital Acquisitions LLC Dirt Nap Squad. 107	Posted - 2014.03.29 23:41:00 - [45] - Quote Rusty Shallows wrote: Your in-block is late by a year. We've had request for no HAVs in Ambush since Chromosome. These posts are classic and still enjoyable to read. True dat, I meant the inb4 for the OP more than anyone else so we could avoid the diatribe that would just reveal all that anyways, and make that post a statement of full disclosure so we (OP, the forum community and I) could be reasonably logical with one another moving forward. Open-Beta Vet. Drunk Night Tree Burner. This is my Main and Original. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR.


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]