|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
el OPERATOR
Capital Acquisitions LLC
Dirt Nap Squad.
103
   |
Posted - 2014.03.29 18:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
SALH wrote:Or give us ambush without tanks. You have ambush oms, ambush, why not infantry ambush. Most players would agree that tanks are ruining ambush. Please CCP make a infantry vs infantry mode. I know if this happen players would be happy, but the down side is that no one would hardly play the ambush modes with tanks, but tankers. CCP look at the leaderboards those at the top are majority tankers with unbeleivable KDR"S I think I seen some one with a 1009.0 KDR that's the highest. Come on CCP that is rediculous. Players like me support your game and spend money on aur to see the game develope in the right direction. I enjoy playing but I really thought 1.8 would have been awesome.
No. At risk of sounding like some of the more vociferous EVElings in here, HTFU. DUST is all about the WARFARE, ie You war, You pay. It isn't WARFAIR, ie You war, You do it from an even field. Learn some AV skills, or learn to keep your head down and stay the f out of the way. Maybe, if you want to focus on infantry, try covering the backs of anyone you see running AV since they're the suicidal few who are covering your back against those tanks.
inb4FUQQ- I agree tanks are OP vs. Inf (but they're TANKS) , since most AV (proxes and swarms especially) are generally UP, agree with the hardener nerf and the total vehicle on-field limits recently enacted. I also agree a huge chunk of the infantry population cry too hard over dumb ****.
If you want to train AV tactics without sacrificing your precious kdr here, hate to say it but, go do a couple hundred hours in BF3 or 4. Our tanks are actually easier in a lot of ways than those over there.
Open-Beta Vet.
Drunk Night Tree Burner.
This is my Main and Original.
|
el OPERATOR
Capital Acquisitions LLC
Dirt Nap Squad.
103
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 18:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Athena Sentinel wrote:Or another map type that plays like that.
A huge map where you could only have dropship would rock. Maybe some jungle cover....
This I agree with. Map design that effectively promotes certain tactics. Although such maps would be, for all intents and purposes, "unbalanced". But again, Warfare not Warfair.
Open-Beta Vet.
Drunk Night Tree Burner.
This is my Main and Original.
|
el OPERATOR
Capital Acquisitions LLC
Dirt Nap Squad.
104
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Go get your OP militia tank and I'll go get my UP AV fit and we can compare who and what ain't ****. Is BF a better balance between infantry and vehicles? In some ways. Are troopers in BF tactically more effective in dealing with vehicles than most troops in here? In most ways yes.
And as long as your proposing sweeping changes to the same game/modes/matches as I am playingI will continue to be a part of the discussion whether you like it, agree or not. If that doesn't work for you, then I'm sorry open forums are too OP for you to handle.
Open-Beta Vet.
Drunk Night Tree Burner.
This is my Main and Original.
|
el OPERATOR
Capital Acquisitions LLC
Dirt Nap Squad.
105
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
SALH wrote:el OPERATOR wrote:Go get your OP militia tank and I'll go get my UP AV fit and we can compare who and what ain't ****. Is BF a better balance between infantry and vehicles? In some ways. Are troopers in BF tactically more effective in dealing with vehicles than most troops in here? In most ways yes.
And as long as your proposing sweeping changes to the same game/modes/matches as I am playing I will continue to be a part of the discussion whether you like it, agree or not. If that doesn't work for you, then I'm sorry open forums are too OP for you to handle. It seems it may be OP for you. Like I suggest CCP PLEASE TAKE THE TANKS OUT OF AMBUSH GL, HF o7! NOSEY
Yeah, they're OP against stupid. Which is why I effectively solo them often and have yet to start a thread pleading to CCP to exclude them. GL,HF o7, TREEEEAAAACK!
Open-Beta Vet.
Drunk Night Tree Burner.
This is my Main and Original.
|
el OPERATOR
Capital Acquisitions LLC
Dirt Nap Squad.
106
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
What can I say? Learing to fight tanks instead of constantly qqing about tanks is bringing sexy back.
Open-Beta Vet.
Drunk Night Tree Burner.
This is my Main and Original.
|
el OPERATOR
Capital Acquisitions LLC
Dirt Nap Squad.
106
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:45:00 -
[6] - Quote
SALH wrote:
Infantry only? That sounds wonderful. Just tired of being uplinked trapped by tanks.
*cough*Smart deploy sucking is a totally different issue than that tanks need to be removed*cough*
Open-Beta Vet.
Drunk Night Tree Burner.
This is my Main and Original.
|
el OPERATOR
Capital Acquisitions LLC
Dirt Nap Squad.
107
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 23:41:00 -
[7] - Quote
Rusty Shallows wrote:
Your in-block is late by a year. We've had request for no HAVs in Ambush since Chromosome. These posts are classic and still enjoyable to read.
True dat, I meant the inb4 for the OP more than anyone else so we could avoid the diatribe that would just reveal all that anyways, and make that post a statement of full disclosure so we (OP, the forum community and I) could be reasonably logical with one another moving forward.
Open-Beta Vet.
Drunk Night Tree Burner.
This is my Main and Original.
DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR.
|
|
|
| |
|