Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
4610
|
Posted - 2014.02.12 20:17:00 -
[91] - Quote
Shokhann Echo wrote: I take that you have respect for me after months of being on opposite sides of the same class now....
To be honest, you were one of the few tankers on the forums who didn't pretend as if they are better than the rest of the playerbase, and some of your balance ideas were actually reasonable.
In a way, yes. While it hate to admit it, there are tankers on these forums that I did respect and admire, and still do to an extent.
Want to know how to make a strike-through?
[s[Example[/s]
Now go my Forum Warriors. Use this new weapon for glory!
|
Shokhann Echo
Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation
193
|
Posted - 2014.02.12 20:37:00 -
[92] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Shokhann Echo wrote: I take that you have respect for me after months of being on opposite sides of the same class now....
To be honest, you were one of the few tankers on the forums who didn't pretend as if they are better than the rest of the playerbase, and some of your balance ideas were actually reasonable. In a way, yes. While it hate to admit it, there are tankers on these forums that I did respect and admire, and still do to an extent.
hehehe, i have a loveable character once you get past the walls
Void Echo Alt #1
Back on main 3-31-14
Il be back in game within the next month or so.
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
6992
|
Posted - 2014.02.12 20:38:00 -
[93] - Quote
Shokhann Echo wrote:Atiim wrote:Shokhann Echo wrote: I take that you have respect for me after months of being on opposite sides of the same class now....
To be honest, you were one of the few tankers on the forums who didn't pretend as if they are better than the rest of the playerbase, and some of your balance ideas were actually reasonable. In a way, yes. While it hate to admit it, there are tankers on these forums that I did respect and admire, and still do to an extent. hehehe, i have a loveable character once you get past the walls
Am I one?
I hate the Large Blaster with a passion and long for the days of 1.6 now past.
"Just know that though our enemies may only #YOLO, through God's grace we can #YOLF at his side." - Disciple of Kesha
|
Shokhann Echo
Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation
193
|
Posted - 2014.02.12 20:46:00 -
[94] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Shokhann Echo wrote:Atiim wrote:Shokhann Echo wrote: I take that you have respect for me after months of being on opposite sides of the same class now....
To be honest, you were one of the few tankers on the forums who didn't pretend as if they are better than the rest of the playerbase, and some of your balance ideas were actually reasonable. In a way, yes. While it hate to admit it, there are tankers on these forums that I did respect and admire, and still do to an extent. hehehe, i have a loveable character once you get past the walls Am I one? I hate the Large Blaster with a passion and long for the days of 1.6 now past.
your a strange one...
Void Echo Alt #1
Back on main 3-31-14
Il be back in game within the next month or so.
|
el OPERATOR
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
85
|
Posted - 2014.02.12 21:03:00 -
[95] - Quote
Shokhann Echo wrote:TYCHUS MAXWELL wrote:I can't hear the sound of the tank QQ over the damage immunity to most of the weapons in the ******* game.
Seriously, what the **** is a tankers problem? What because something can kill you, suddenly you guys have the right to *****?
Militia Assault rifles have been killing proto suits since they were first introduced. We as a community make fun of the proto QQ because they shouldn't expect an auto win.
Why do tanks expect an auto win? Is it because they get an auto win on most suit loadouts and against lavs that aren't jihaded. Hills and shooting them once will stop jihad jeeps.
Tankers are such spoiled brats, they ignore their inherent immunities and the fact that more than anything else in the game they can kill without reproach. When something can kill them, they ***** to no end.
Please just do the whole community a favor CCP and remove tanks so they will go play WoT or something...
They aren't even a logical weapon in warfare 3000 years into the future. It's like using horses now, they would be far too easy to destroy. It's like thinking giant robots would be useful in warfare. We can use handheld devices to shred tanks in the modern world let alone in star wars future space world war sim. by that same logic, infantry is a very ancient military asset, if that's the case then infantry should be removed as well and everything replaced with drones. infantry is older than tanks are in the military world.
They were. By clones.
Open-Beta Vet.
NPC Corp Independent Contractor.
Drunk Night Tree Burner.
This is my Main and Original.
|
Shokhann Echo
Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation
194
|
Posted - 2014.02.12 21:06:00 -
[96] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Shokhann Echo wrote:my message to Atiim: and what about us tankers that persevered through over a year of AV's nerf to tanks over and over again, before 1.7 tanks were nearly extinct, it was call of duty 514, ******* boring. nice try but tankers have had 100x more bullshit to adapt to over the past year than AV has in the past 3 months. (im not a tanker anymore but your post really pissed me off as a former tanker, try not to sell anymore lies. btw see you when I get back on in a month or 2 hehehe ) 100x more bull$#!t? Not really. I would have commended you guys, but you never actually adapted. You QQ'd until the very end. AV // Infantry on the other hand, actually stopped the QQ. How is that a lie? When was the last time you've seen a Tank QQ thread created. We've adapted, you didn't. That's a fact.
how the **** did I miss this comment?????
yeah we adapted to everything AV and CCP hit us into the ground with. I see tank QQ threads all the time in the furms, just because there are none in GD section doesn't mean they don't exist anymore.
Void Echo Alt #1
Back on main 3-31-14
Il be back in game within the next month or so.
|
Shokhann Echo
Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation
194
|
Posted - 2014.02.12 21:07:00 -
[97] - Quote
el OPERATOR wrote:Shokhann Echo wrote:TYCHUS MAXWELL wrote:I can't hear the sound of the tank QQ over the damage immunity to most of the weapons in the ******* game.
Seriously, what the **** is a tankers problem? What because something can kill you, suddenly you guys have the right to *****?
Militia Assault rifles have been killing proto suits since they were first introduced. We as a community make fun of the proto QQ because they shouldn't expect an auto win.
Why do tanks expect an auto win? Is it because they get an auto win on most suit loadouts and against lavs that aren't jihaded. Hills and shooting them once will stop jihad jeeps.
Tankers are such spoiled brats, they ignore their inherent immunities and the fact that more than anything else in the game they can kill without reproach. When something can kill them, they ***** to no end.
Please just do the whole community a favor CCP and remove tanks so they will go play WoT or something...
They aren't even a logical weapon in warfare 3000 years into the future. It's like using horses now, they would be far too easy to destroy. It's like thinking giant robots would be useful in warfare. We can use handheld devices to shred tanks in the modern world let alone in star wars future space world war sim. by that same logic, infantry is a very ancient military asset, if that's the case then infantry should be removed as well and everything replaced with drones. infantry is older than tanks are in the military world. They were. By clones.
they are still infantry. if it has 2 legs and shoots something, its infantry.
Void Echo Alt #1
Back on main 3-31-14
Il be back in game within the next month or so.
|
el OPERATOR
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
85
|
Posted - 2014.02.12 21:24:00 -
[98] - Quote
Shokhann Echo wrote:el OPERATOR wrote:Shokhann Echo wrote:TYCHUS MAXWELL wrote:I can't hear the sound of the tank QQ over the damage immunity to most of the weapons in the ******* game.
Seriously, what the **** is a tankers problem? What because something can kill you, suddenly you guys have the right to *****?
Militia Assault rifles have been killing proto suits since they were first introduced. We as a community make fun of the proto QQ because they shouldn't expect an auto win.
Why do tanks expect an auto win? Is it because they get an auto win on most suit loadouts and against lavs that aren't jihaded. Hills and shooting them once will stop jihad jeeps.
Tankers are such spoiled brats, they ignore their inherent immunities and the fact that more than anything else in the game they can kill without reproach. When something can kill them, they ***** to no end.
Please just do the whole community a favor CCP and remove tanks so they will go play WoT or something...
They aren't even a logical weapon in warfare 3000 years into the future. It's like using horses now, they would be far too easy to destroy. It's like thinking giant robots would be useful in warfare. We can use handheld devices to shred tanks in the modern world let alone in star wars future space world war sim. by that same logic, infantry is a very ancient military asset, if that's the case then infantry should be removed as well and everything replaced with drones. infantry is older than tanks are in the military world. They were. By clones. they are still infantry. if it has 2 legs and shoots something, its infantry.
Hm. Ok, point made.
Open-Beta Vet.
NPC Corp Independent Contractor.
Drunk Night Tree Burner.
This is my Main and Original.
|
Benjamin Ciscko
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
1657
|
Posted - 2014.02.12 21:25:00 -
[99] - Quote
Tanks so OP they can be insta popped by a jihad jeep, die quickly without hardners die instantaneously by proxies with out a hardener remotes can be strategically placed and detonated, a team of two breach FG's can easily one shot it with hardeners down a team of 2 IAFG can kill a tank or force it to back off. double damage modded sica's can 2-3 shot tanks without hardener's and can retreat behind a hill in their redline when you engage yup tanks definitely OP.
Caldari Tanker/Minmatar Assault
Forum warrior lvl 1
Prof. V scrub
|
Monkey MAC
Rough Riders..
1945
|
Posted - 2014.02.12 23:12:00 -
[100] - Quote
el OPERATOR wrote:Shokhann Echo wrote:el OPERATOR wrote:Shokhann Echo wrote:TYCHUS MAXWELL wrote:I can't hear the sound of the tank QQ over the damage immunity to most of the weapons in the ******* game.
Seriously, what the **** is a tankers problem? What because something can kill you, suddenly you guys have the right to *****?
Militia Assault rifles have been killing proto suits since they were first introduced. We as a community make fun of the proto QQ because they shouldn't expect an auto win.
Why do tanks expect an auto win? Is it because they get an auto win on most suit loadouts and against lavs that aren't jihaded. Hills and shooting them once will stop jihad jeeps.
Tankers are such spoiled brats, they ignore their inherent immunities and the fact that more than anything else in the game they can kill without reproach. When something can kill them, they ***** to no end.
Please just do the whole community a favor CCP and remove tanks so they will go play WoT or something...
They aren't even a logical weapon in warfare 3000 years into the future. It's like using horses now, they would be far too easy to destroy. It's like thinking giant robots would be useful in warfare. We can use handheld devices to shred tanks in the modern world let alone in star wars future space world war sim. by that same logic, infantry is a very ancient military asset, if that's the case then infantry should be removed as well and everything replaced with drones. infantry is older than tanks are in the military world. They were. By clones. they are still infantry. if it has 2 legs and shoots something, its infantry. Hm. Ok, point made.
Isn't war outdated by then? Its a game that's why we aren't removing anything.
We BALANCE it.
Tanks 514
I told you, I bloody well told you.
Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl.1
|
|
Nothing Certain
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
228
|
Posted - 2014.02.12 23:24:00 -
[101] - Quote
Benjamin Ciscko wrote:Tanks so OP they can be insta popped by a jihad jeep, die quickly without hardners die instantaneously by proxies with out a hardener remotes can be strategically placed and detonated, a team of two breach FG's can easily one shot it with hardeners down a team of 2 IAFG can kill a tank or force it to back off. double damage modded sica's can 2-3 shot tanks without hardener's and can retreat behind a hill in their redline when you engage yup tanks definitely OP.
What is the average kdr of a tanker do you think? Don't you have in effect two characters when you tank, you have all the benefits a tank gives you, pop out of it and you still have a drop suit just like everybody else. Tanks can be killed, but it is nowhere near a 1:1 ratio, wouldn't you agree? So how are they NOT OP? Tanks are always going to be OP, they will always give an advantage to the person using them, what we are really arguing about is the limits we want and will accept.
Because, that's why.
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
4613
|
Posted - 2014.02.13 01:16:00 -
[102] - Quote
Benjamin Ciscko wrote:Tanks so OP they can be insta popped by a jihad jeep, die quickly without hardners die instantaneously by proxies with out a hardener remotes can be strategically placed and detonated, a team of two breach FG's can easily one shot it with hardeners down a team of 2 IAFG can kill a tank or force it to back off. double damage modded sica's can 2-3 shot tanks without hardener's and can retreat behind a hill in their redline when you engage yup tanks definitely OP. Railguns are so OP they can be avoided by strafing around the target, dropships can use afterburners to outmaneuver it's tracking speed, two Ion Cannons can pop a Particle Cannon, another railtank can easily 3- shot them, a strategically placed dropship can avoid and dodge them. yup tanks definitely OP.
Remote & Proximity Explosives? Really? Get Better.
Want to know how to make a strike-through?
[s[Example[/s]
Now go my Forum Warriors. Use this new weapon for glory!
|
Benjamin Ciscko
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
1657
|
Posted - 2014.02.13 02:33:00 -
[103] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Benjamin Ciscko wrote:Tanks so OP they can be insta popped by a jihad jeep, die quickly without hardners die instantaneously by proxies with out a hardener remotes can be strategically placed and detonated, a team of two breach FG's can easily one shot it with hardeners down a team of 2 IAFG can kill a tank or force it to back off. double damage modded sica's can 2-3 shot tanks without hardener's and can retreat behind a hill in their redline when you engage yup tanks definitely OP. Railguns are so OP they can be avoided by strafing around the target, dropships can use afterburners to outmaneuver it's tracking speed, two Ion Cannons can pop a Particle Cannon, another railtank can easily 3- shot them, a strategically placed dropship can avoid and dodge them. yup tanks definitely OP. Remote & Proximity Explosives? Really? Get Better. I've seen boundless remotes explode on contact when I was running with a nitrous active. Particle Cannon is fine just fix damage mods maybe slightly less ROF I've seen armor ADS's survive 2 particle cannon shots unhardened (no dmg mods either) Rail = Anti tank it should stomp an ION and legend can kill most rail tankers with an ION cannon.
EDIT: I rushed through that going to play actual game so if I missed something sarcastic don't troll me too much.
Caldari Tanker/Minmatar Assault
Forum warrior lvl 1
Prof. V scrub
|
TYCHUS MAXWELL
Ghosts of Dawn General Tso's Alliance
32
|
Posted - 2014.02.13 03:51:00 -
[104] - Quote
Shokhann Echo wrote:TYCHUS MAXWELL wrote:I can't hear the sound of the tank QQ over the damage immunity to most of the weapons in the ******* game.
Seriously, what the **** is a tankers problem? What because something can kill you, suddenly you guys have the right to *****?
Militia Assault rifles have been killing proto suits since they were first introduced. We as a community make fun of the proto QQ because they shouldn't expect an auto win.
Why do tanks expect an auto win? Is it because they get an auto win on most suit loadouts and against lavs that aren't jihaded. Hills and shooting them once will stop jihad jeeps.
Tankers are such spoiled brats, they ignore their inherent immunities and the fact that more than anything else in the game they can kill without reproach. When something can kill them, they ***** to no end.
Please just do the whole community a favor CCP and remove tanks so they will go play WoT or something...
They aren't even a logical weapon in warfare 3000 years into the future. It's like using horses now, they would be far too easy to destroy. It's like thinking giant robots would be useful in warfare. We can use handheld devices to shred tanks in the modern world let alone in star wars future space world war sim. by that same logic, infantry is a very ancient military asset, if that's the case then infantry should be removed as well and everything replaced with drones. infantry is older than tanks are in the military world.
You should of read my other post bud, I fully acknowledged everything about these games are not realistic. I just put it out of the way because the number one reason tankers say they should be OP is because they are "tanks". Claiming it's unrealistic if they can't eat 30 missles and a 6-8 rail gun blasts, when in reality the opposite is true, it's unrealistic that they can. It's all about GAME balance though, and tanks are not balanced from a game play perspective.
See my other post you skipped over for why.
Edit: Also no, you don't understand military strategy. Horses and Tanks aren't outdated because they are "Old". Infantry in modern warfare and future warfare would never be outdated. Drones can be disabled in ways that no military would hesitate to do unlike biological organisms. IE killing your own personnel and civilians. |
Shokhann Echo
Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation
195
|
Posted - 2014.02.14 07:20:00 -
[105] - Quote
TYCHUS MAXWELL wrote:Shokhann Echo wrote:TYCHUS MAXWELL wrote:I can't hear the sound of the tank QQ over the damage immunity to most of the weapons in the ******* game.
Seriously, what the **** is a tankers problem? What because something can kill you, suddenly you guys have the right to *****?
Militia Assault rifles have been killing proto suits since they were first introduced. We as a community make fun of the proto QQ because they shouldn't expect an auto win.
Why do tanks expect an auto win? Is it because they get an auto win on most suit loadouts and against lavs that aren't jihaded. Hills and shooting them once will stop jihad jeeps.
Tankers are such spoiled brats, they ignore their inherent immunities and the fact that more than anything else in the game they can kill without reproach. When something can kill them, they ***** to no end.
Please just do the whole community a favor CCP and remove tanks so they will go play WoT or something...
They aren't even a logical weapon in warfare 3000 years into the future. It's like using horses now, they would be far too easy to destroy. It's like thinking giant robots would be useful in warfare. We can use handheld devices to shred tanks in the modern world let alone in star wars future space world war sim. by that same logic, infantry is a very ancient military asset, if that's the case then infantry should be removed as well and everything replaced with drones. infantry is older than tanks are in the military world. You should of read my other post bud, I fully acknowledged everything about these games are not realistic. I just put it out of the way because the number one reason tankers say they should be OP is because they are "tanks". Claiming it's unrealistic if they can't eat 30 missles and a 6-8 rail gun blasts, when in reality the opposite is true, it's unrealistic that they can. It's all about GAME balance though, and tanks are not balanced from a game play perspective. See my other post you skipped over for why. Edit: Also no, you don't understand military strategy. Horses and Tanks aren't outdated because they are "Old". Infantry in modern warfare and future warfare would never be outdated. Drones can be disabled in ways that no military would hesitate to do unlike biological organisms. IE killing your own personnel and civilians.
then stop saying that years in the future tanks are no longer needed, your contradicting yourself all over here
Void Echo Alt #1
Back on main 3-31-14
Il be back in game within the next month or so.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |