DUST Search - My Final Message To The AV Community.(Maybe)

el OPERATOR wrote:

Shokhann Echo wrote:

el OPERATOR wrote:

Shokhann Echo wrote:

TYCHUS MAXWELL wrote:

I can't hear the sound of the tank QQ over the damage immunity to most of the weapons in the ******* game.

Seriously, what the **** is a tankers problem? What because something can kill you, suddenly you guys have the right to *****?

Militia Assault rifles have been killing proto suits since they were first introduced. We as a community make fun of the proto QQ because they shouldn't expect an auto win.

Why do tanks expect an auto win? Is it because they get an auto win on most suit loadouts and against lavs that aren't jihaded. Hills and shooting them once will stop jihad jeeps.

Tankers are such spoiled brats, they ignore their inherent immunities and the fact that more than anything else in the game they can kill without reproach. When something can kill them, they ***** to no end.

Please just do the whole community a favor CCP and remove tanks so they will go play WoT or something...

They aren't even a logical weapon in warfare 3000 years into the future. It's like using horses now, they would be far too easy to destroy. It's like thinking giant robots would be useful in warfare. We can use handheld devices to shred tanks in the modern world let alone in star wars future space world war sim.

by that same logic, infantry is a very ancient military asset, if that's the case then infantry should be removed as well and everything replaced with drones. infantry is older than tanks are in the military world.

They were. By clones.

they are still infantry. if it has 2 legs and shoots something, its infantry.

Hm. Ok, point made.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 1934	Posted - 2014.02.12 14:37:00 - [1] - Quote I love Tankers responses. AV hasn't adapted there just Scrubs. So using Tanks to take out tanks, as per the suggestion of tankers, isn't adapting? . . . . we never said that. Spkr4thedead wrote: Infantry just cannot accept that the best counter to a tank should be another tank. No, it has to be infantry weapons, that are each all more powerful than a turret. That's like saying a 40mm 203 round is more powerful than the main gun of an Abrams. You told us to adapt and use tanks, we did . . . . and how aren't LAV bombs adapting? AV didn't do the job we needed to do, so we built mobile landmines. If anything LAV bombs are the definition of adaption, changing ones method to achieve results that were no longer achievable with the orginal method. . . . . but there OP? How? They can be scanned, blown up with an AR and require the sacrifice of the user, they are a last resort. . . . . . but OP Tanker commemces crying about Tanks and LAV bombs We have adapted, the problem tankers have is that we didn't adapt the way they wanted us to. I.E running around trying to kill tanks with AR's while they slaughter everyone with immunity. Tanks 514 I told you, I bloody well told you. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl.1
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 1945	Posted - 2014.02.12 23:12:00 - [2] - Quote el OPERATOR wrote: Shokhann Echo wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Shokhann Echo wrote: TYCHUS MAXWELL wrote: I can't hear the sound of the tank QQ over the damage immunity to most of the weapons in the ***** game. Seriously, what the is a tankers problem? What because something can kill you, suddenly you guys have the right to *? Militia Assault rifles have been killing proto suits since they were first introduced. We as a community make fun of the proto QQ because they shouldn't expect an auto win. Why do tanks expect an auto win? Is it because they get an auto win on most suit loadouts and against lavs that aren't jihaded. Hills and shooting them once will stop jihad jeeps. Tankers are such spoiled brats, they ignore their inherent immunities and the fact that more than anything else in the game they can kill without reproach. When something can kill them, they *** to no end. Please just do the whole community a favor CCP and remove tanks so they will go play WoT or something... They aren't even a logical weapon in warfare 3000 years into the future. It's like using horses now, they would be far too easy to destroy. It's like thinking giant robots would be useful in warfare. We can use handheld devices to shred tanks in the modern world let alone in star wars future space world war sim. by that same logic, infantry is a very ancient military asset, if that's the case then infantry should be removed as well and everything replaced with drones. infantry is older than tanks are in the military world. They were. By clones. they are still infantry. if it has 2 legs and shoots something, its infantry. Hm. Ok, point made. Isn't war outdated by then? Its a game that's why we aren't removing anything. We BALANCE it. Tanks 514 I told you, I bloody well told you. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl.1