Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Fizzer94
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1652
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 17:21:00 -
[61] - Quote
sira draco wrote:Fizzer94 wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:People seem to think dust is real life, and not a video game Life is a game if you really think about it., we make made up goals and rules to live/play by. Ethics and Morality are completely made up ideas that humanity evolved to increase it's chances of survival. The only rules are the ones we enforce upon ourselves, and there is no cosmic law, other than the laws of physics. The ideas of Good and Evil are false ideologies. Whatever you can do, you can do. Are you playing to win? I didn't think so... Because there is no win condition. Edit: give us a skill refund! So if i walk up to you and stab you to death just to steal your wallet that is not morally wrong? If i kidnap and rrape girls just because I can, is that okay too? Whatever I can do I can do, according to you Yup. You'll be punished due to the way our societies' work however. Morals are nothing more than rules that humans made up for themselves. There are no great forces of good and evil, and the universe does not judge you for your actions. This is not me saying I don't find murder and **** disgusting, I do find them to be horrid and disgusting things and think that anyone who does either should be punished. I just understand that I find them to be horrid things because my brain is hardwired that way, not because they are fundamentally wrong with the balance of the universe or whatever. I just have an understanding that morals are unsubstantial, and the only thing holding us to them are our own minds... Just a bit of philosophy.
Yours Truly,
Reginald Fizzer94 Delafontaine III, Esquire
|
CaoticFox
Axis of Chaos
125
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 17:51:00 -
[62] - Quote
Tebu Gan wrote:devonus durga wrote:Bethhy wrote:Quote:A scrub is a player who is handicapped by self-imposed rules that the game knows nothing about. A scrub does not play to win.
There is the mistaken notion, though, that by merely continuing to play or GÇ£learnGÇ¥ the game, one can become a top player. In reality, the GÇ£scrubGÇ¥ has many more mental obstacles to overcome than anything actually going on during the game. The scrub has lost the game even before it starts. HeGÇÖs lost the game even before deciding which game to play. His problem? He does not play to win.
The scrub would take great issue with this statement for he usually believes that he is playing to win, but he is bound up by an intricate construct of fictitious rules that prevents him from ever truly competing. These made-up rules vary from game to game, of course, but their character remains constant. Yes, its called ethics. By that notion, the us is scrubs, for not nuking everyone. Definition noted, lulled at, and discarded. Fella, I think you missed a lot of the points I was trying to make. Something you need to understand, there will always be FOTM chasers. As long as this is a competitive game, people will always be looking for the next best thing. A single respec isn't going to flip the whole world upside down. Some will go into the FOTM, yeah. A lot will go right back into what they had. Some will go for something totally new. I find it foolish to assume that every single person will go into the FOTM to be competitive. It takes all kinds of suits to make a PC match result in a win! We will still need heavies, tanks, logis, slayers, scouts, ect ect ect. Something else, I really don't think CCP listens as heavily as you think to feedback. Yes they will take in issues player bring up, and then look to find why there might or might not be an issue there. I don't think it has anything to do with player feedback, if anything players are warning of the next FOTM, yet CCP does nothing to change it. As for respecs, they are needed. This game is becoming stagnant, and needs a little bump. The EVE comparison, was meant to only compare what it means to PVP combat. Yeah I know you can take a miner out and PVE, but hey, YOU CAN'T DO THAT ON DUST. What you can do is PVP. And Ethics. You call it Ethics. You know, the early colonist and soldiers feared the Native Americans (my people). They were big on honor in combat, so standing in clear view of one another was the way to go. No sneaky bullshit, all ethical. The natives, they used camo, surprise, deceit. They would slit your throat while you slept, never giving you the chance to fight back. The warriors, they fought with honor too. They understood well, that a superior force was only as superior as their tactics. That is what dust currently is. Play to win. So by your reasoning, we should identify what is OP, and all together, not spec into it? Are you that DAFT! Ethics has no place in new eden! Yeah yea, you want pve blah blah blah. Guess what, THIS is what you have. It's not changing anytime soon. i am native american... Seminole RunningBear is my tribe and birth name... that said, u r a disgrace... only commanchi, and mohawks did as u say... the rest MOVED elswhere to be left alone... thos 2 tribes btw (that fought as u described) were exterminated |
MINA Longstrike
2Shitz 1Giggle
233
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 18:04:00 -
[63] - Quote
Money in eve does not come from pvp. It comes from pve - high value moons & moon mining, ship production (capital, t2, t3) and sales, wormholes, research, lp sales, hauling, trading, incursions, missions, mining. It is incredibly rare to make money off of pvp - pvp is done mostly to deny resources and income to others, to safeguard ones 'territory' and because its fun.
Your analogy is flawed by the mere idea that the most money comes from pvp, while stuff like suicide tanking can be worth a bit it's not nearly as good income (or as consistent) as owning an r64 moon. |
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
450
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 18:29:00 -
[64] - Quote
CaoticFox wrote:Tebu Gan wrote:devonus durga wrote:Bethhy wrote:Quote:A scrub is a player who is handicapped by self-imposed rules that the game knows nothing about. A scrub does not play to win.
There is the mistaken notion, though, that by merely continuing to play or GÇ£learnGÇ¥ the game, one can become a top player. In reality, the GÇ£scrubGÇ¥ has many more mental obstacles to overcome than anything actually going on during the game. The scrub has lost the game even before it starts. HeGÇÖs lost the game even before deciding which game to play. His problem? He does not play to win.
The scrub would take great issue with this statement for he usually believes that he is playing to win, but he is bound up by an intricate construct of fictitious rules that prevents him from ever truly competing. These made-up rules vary from game to game, of course, but their character remains constant. Yes, its called ethics. By that notion, the us is scrubs, for not nuking everyone. Definition noted, lulled at, and discarded. Fella, I think you missed a lot of the points I was trying to make. Something you need to understand, there will always be FOTM chasers. As long as this is a competitive game, people will always be looking for the next best thing. A single respec isn't going to flip the whole world upside down. Some will go into the FOTM, yeah. A lot will go right back into what they had. Some will go for something totally new. I find it foolish to assume that every single person will go into the FOTM to be competitive. It takes all kinds of suits to make a PC match result in a win! We will still need heavies, tanks, logis, slayers, scouts, ect ect ect. Something else, I really don't think CCP listens as heavily as you think to feedback. Yes they will take in issues player bring up, and then look to find why there might or might not be an issue there. I don't think it has anything to do with player feedback, if anything players are warning of the next FOTM, yet CCP does nothing to change it. As for respecs, they are needed. This game is becoming stagnant, and needs a little bump. The EVE comparison, was meant to only compare what it means to PVP combat. Yeah I know you can take a miner out and PVE, but hey, YOU CAN'T DO THAT ON DUST. What you can do is PVP. And Ethics. You call it Ethics. You know, the early colonist and soldiers feared the Native Americans (my people). They were big on honor in combat, so standing in clear view of one another was the way to go. No sneaky bullshit, all ethical. The natives, they used camo, surprise, deceit. They would slit your throat while you slept, never giving you the chance to fight back. The warriors, they fought with honor too. They understood well, that a superior force was only as superior as their tactics. That is what dust currently is. Play to win. So by your reasoning, we should identify what is OP, and all together, not spec into it? Are you that DAFT! Ethics has no place in new eden! Yeah yea, you want pve blah blah blah. Guess what, THIS is what you have. It's not changing anytime soon. i am native american... Seminole RunningBear is my tribe and birth name... that said, u r a disgrace... only commanchi, and mohawks did as u say... the rest MOVED elswhere to be left alone... thos 2 tribes btw (that fought as u described) were exterminated
I'm sorry, I think you are mistaken. Many tribes warred, and being a people of the land, they used that same land for protection. Yes some were peaceful, like the cherokee, but even they warred. Strife is a part of human nature anywhere.
Your tribe, the Seminole, like the Creeks, originated from Florida. Which is where they ran to escape pressure from other tribes and colonists. And don't you think for one second they did not war for their lands. Florida as you know can be SWAMPY. When american troops came a knocking, the Seminole, like the creeks, employed Guerrilla tactics, and surprised the american troops more than a little.
No, it could be offensive to say they would slit your throat while you slept, but what I had intended on was that they used Guerrilla tactics to counter a superior force. No not all tribes would kill sleeping victims, but it might surprise you that quite a few tribes weren't above doing whatever necessary to win.
No fella, it wasn't just the commanchi and the mohawks that did this, all tribes used various forms of guerrilla warfare. And I believe the mohawks were a part of a larger confederacy along with 4 other tribes, and they called themselves the Iroquois. The term Iroquois like the term Seminole are corruptions of their respective languages. I know seminole means runaway, but I forget what the Iroquois mean. Though I know the Iroquois actually call themselves the Haudenosaunee.
Yes sir, I'm a proud native american myself, though like many, my blood has been mixed with many of other tribes, and bit of white. I belong to the Cherokee, Creek, and Seminole that I know of directly, and my grandfather is full blooded. Do a quick wiki of some of your own tribes history, and of other tribes. It was a different time and place back then, and what has been taught in school, I can assure you, is only the half of it. I'm proud sir of my roots, and there is no dishonor in protecting your homeland by whatever means necessary.
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
450
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 18:36:00 -
[65] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:Money in eve does not come from pvp. It comes from pve - high value moons & moon mining, ship production (capital, t2, t3) and sales, wormholes, research, lp sales, hauling, trading, incursions, missions, mining. It is incredibly rare to make money off of pvp - pvp is done mostly to deny resources and income to others, to safeguard ones 'territory' and because its fun.
Your analogy is flawed by the mere idea that the most money comes from pvp, while stuff like suicide tanking can be worth a bit it's not nearly as good income (or as consistent) as owning an r64 moon.
What? I made no mention of money. The comparison between EvE and Dust was meant to focus on the point of PVP and nothing else. Competition.
Nuff Said
|
sira draco
Ancient Erectiles
48
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 19:22:00 -
[66] - Quote
Fizzer94 wrote:sira draco wrote:Fizzer94 wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:People seem to think dust is real life, and not a video game Life is a game if you really think about it., we make made up goals and rules to live/play by. Ethics and Morality are completely made up ideas that humanity evolved to increase it's chances of survival. The only rules are the ones we enforce upon ourselves, and there is no cosmic law, other than the laws of physics. The ideas of Good and Evil are false ideologies. Whatever you can do, you can do. Are you playing to win? I didn't think so... Because there is no win condition. Edit: give us a skill refund! So if i walk up to you and stab you to death just to steal your wallet that is not morally wrong? If i kidnap and rrape girls just because I can, is that okay too? Whatever I can do I can do, according to you Yup. You'll be punished due to the way our societies' work however. Morals are nothing more than rules that humans made up for themselves. There are no great forces of good and evil, and the universe does not judge you for your actions. This is not me saying I don't find murder and **** disgusting, I do find them to be horrid and disgusting things and think that anyone who does either should be punished. I just understand that I find them to be horrid things because my brain is hardwired that way, not because they are fundamentally wrong with the balance of the universe or whatever. I just have an understanding that morals are unsubstantial, and the only thing holding us to them are our own minds... Just a bit of philosophy.
I agree with some of your points, I think that most of what we consider morals are relative, but some things like stealing from the poor and hurting or killing people just because you can is wrong.
As far as this game goes, its not fun when everyone is exploiting everything and always working to stack the odds in their favor, its ruining the game for vets and new people. |
sira draco
Ancient Erectiles
48
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 19:25:00 -
[67] - Quote
This a videogame, its not real life war, its supposed to be fun, its not fun if its unbalance and everyone is forced to use the same gear. |
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
450
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 19:33:00 -
[68] - Quote
sira draco wrote:Fizzer94 wrote:sira draco wrote:Fizzer94 wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:People seem to think dust is real life, and not a video game Life is a game if you really think about it., we make made up goals and rules to live/play by. Ethics and Morality are completely made up ideas that humanity evolved to increase it's chances of survival. The only rules are the ones we enforce upon ourselves, and there is no cosmic law, other than the laws of physics. The ideas of Good and Evil are false ideologies. Whatever you can do, you can do. Are you playing to win? I didn't think so... Because there is no win condition. Edit: give us a skill refund! So if i walk up to you and stab you to death just to steal your wallet that is not morally wrong? If i kidnap and rrape girls just because I can, is that okay too? Whatever I can do I can do, according to you Yup. You'll be punished due to the way our societies' work however. Morals are nothing more than rules that humans made up for themselves. There are no great forces of good and evil, and the universe does not judge you for your actions. This is not me saying I don't find murder and **** disgusting, I do find them to be horrid and disgusting things and think that anyone who does either should be punished. I just understand that I find them to be horrid things because my brain is hardwired that way, not because they are fundamentally wrong with the balance of the universe or whatever. I just have an understanding that morals are unsubstantial, and the only thing holding us to them are our own minds... Just a bit of philosophy. I agree with some of your points, I think that most of what we consider morals are relative, but some things like stealing from the poor and hurting or killing people just because you can is wrong. As far as this game goes, its not fun when everyone is exploiting everything and always working to stack the odds in their favor, its ruining the game for vets and new people.
True, but the point is that it isn't the fault of the players. The players just want to be top dog, and when there is an opportunity, they seize upon. Can't blame them for that.
Nuff Said
|
Espartoi
Zero-Day Attack Zero-Day
19
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 19:37:00 -
[69] - Quote
sira draco wrote:This a videogame, its not real life war, its supposed to be fun, its not fun if its unbalance and everyone is forced to use the same gear.
Agreed
ANother one of those respecs topics, there sould be a section forum for that inside a trash can.
You think that everything must be like you want and all is unfair? the answer is simple as Deal with it or GTFO.
|
Bethhy
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
920
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 19:42:00 -
[70] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:Money in eve does not come from pvp. It comes from pve - high value moons & moon mining, ship production (capital, t2, t3) and sales, wormholes, research, lp sales, hauling, trading, incursions, missions, mining. It is incredibly rare to make money off of pvp - pvp is done mostly to deny resources and income to others, to safeguard ones 'territory' and because its fun.
Your analogy is flawed by the mere idea that the most money comes from pvp, while stuff like suicide tanking can be worth a bit it's not nearly as good income (or as consistent) as owning an r64 moon.
WTF ??? Tech was about PVP not moon mining.... Sure you moon mined for it but it was the PVP that allowed it to happen.
Same with Capital building in a giant open pvp zone....
If you said 0.0 Incursions produced the most ISK compared to others then sure.... even that has a huge element of PVP ask rooks and kings.
Nothing happens in a giant 0.0 Open free pvp zone without it being directly related back to PVP. |
|
Bethhy
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
921
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 19:56:00 -
[71] - Quote
devonus durga wrote:Bethhy wrote:Quote:A scrub is a player who is handicapped by self-imposed rules that the game knows nothing about. A scrub does not play to win.
There is the mistaken notion, though, that by merely continuing to play or GÇ£learnGÇ¥ the game, one can become a top player. In reality, the GÇ£scrubGÇ¥ has many more mental obstacles to overcome than anything actually going on during the game. The scrub has lost the game even before it starts. HeGÇÖs lost the game even before deciding which game to play. His problem? He does not play to win.
The scrub would take great issue with this statement for he usually believes that he is playing to win, but he is bound up by an intricate construct of fictitious rules that prevents him from ever truly competing. These made-up rules vary from game to game, of course, but their character remains constant. Yes, its called ethics. By that notion, the us is scrubs, for not nuking everyone. Definition noted, lulled at, and discarded.
The US can't nuke everyone? a lot of people have nukes... including Pakistan totaling well over a hundred. The US can however with their "Ethics" in operation for that, and what every person who knows the history of their actions,isn't so good. and proves the point further. The US would put those very ideals aside to win, to find the terrorist and worse...
CCP doesn't build a game with "Ethics" in mind and never has. playing to win was always its own set of morale code within a human, and has dictated much of the history we know as true today.
|
MINA Longstrike
2Shitz 1Giggle
233
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 19:58:00 -
[72] - Quote
Bethhy wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:Money in eve does not come from pvp. It comes from pve - high value moons & moon mining, ship production (capital, t2, t3) and sales, wormholes, research, lp sales, hauling, trading, incursions, missions, mining. It is incredibly rare to make money off of pvp - pvp is done mostly to deny resources and income to others, to safeguard ones 'territory' and because its fun.
Your analogy is flawed by the mere idea that the most money comes from pvp, while stuff like suicide tanking can be worth a bit it's not nearly as good income (or as consistent) as owning an r64 moon. WTF ??? Tech was about PVP not moon mining.... Sure you moon mined for it but it was the PVP that allowed it to happen. Same with Capital building in a giant open pvp zone.... If you said 0.0 Incursions produced the most ISK compared to others then sure.... even that has a huge element of PVP ask rooks and kings. Nothing happens in a giant 0.0 Open free pvp zone without it being directly related back to PVP.
R64 moons were upwards of 20b isk monthly per moon and all you had to do was fuel the pos and empty the silos. Pvp was not a money generating activity |
Bethhy
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
921
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 20:17:00 -
[73] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:Bethhy wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:Money in eve does not come from pvp. It comes from pve - high value moons & moon mining, ship production (capital, t2, t3) and sales, wormholes, research, lp sales, hauling, trading, incursions, missions, mining. It is incredibly rare to make money off of pvp - pvp is done mostly to deny resources and income to others, to safeguard ones 'territory' and because its fun.
Your analogy is flawed by the mere idea that the most money comes from pvp, while stuff like suicide tanking can be worth a bit it's not nearly as good income (or as consistent) as owning an r64 moon. WTF ??? Tech was about PVP not moon mining.... Sure you moon mined for it but it was the PVP that allowed it to happen. Same with Capital building in a giant open pvp zone.... If you said 0.0 Incursions produced the most ISK compared to others then sure.... even that has a huge element of PVP ask rooks and kings. Nothing happens in a giant 0.0 Open free pvp zone without it being directly related back to PVP. R64 moons were upwards of 20b isk monthly per moon and all you had to do was fuel the pos and empty the silos. Pvp was not a money generating activity
Oh yea setting up then fueling the POS and moving out the stuff was easy as pie :p
no PVP what so ever. or defense of said POS needed... |
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
451
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 20:18:00 -
[74] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:Bethhy wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:Money in eve does not come from pvp. It comes from pve - high value moons & moon mining, ship production (capital, t2, t3) and sales, wormholes, research, lp sales, hauling, trading, incursions, missions, mining. It is incredibly rare to make money off of pvp - pvp is done mostly to deny resources and income to others, to safeguard ones 'territory' and because its fun.
Your analogy is flawed by the mere idea that the most money comes from pvp, while stuff like suicide tanking can be worth a bit it's not nearly as good income (or as consistent) as owning an r64 moon. WTF ??? Tech was about PVP not moon mining.... Sure you moon mined for it but it was the PVP that allowed it to happen. Same with Capital building in a giant open pvp zone.... If you said 0.0 Incursions produced the most ISK compared to others then sure.... even that has a huge element of PVP ask rooks and kings. Nothing happens in a giant 0.0 Open free pvp zone without it being directly related back to PVP. R64 moons were upwards of 20b isk monthly per moon and all you had to do was fuel the pos and empty the silos. Pvp was not a money generating activity
Yeah, everything done in game is only able to be done because of PVP. PVP is what drives EVEs economy. Without ships blowing up, pve would be nothing.
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
451
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 20:20:00 -
[75] - Quote
Espartoi wrote:sira draco wrote:This a videogame, its not real life war, its supposed to be fun, its not fun if its unbalance and everyone is forced to use the same gear. Agreed ANother one of those respecs topics, there sould be a section forum for that inside a trash can.
You clearly didn't read my OP. It is so much more than that lol. In fact, that is probably the least of what this post is about.
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
451
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 20:28:00 -
[76] - Quote
sira draco wrote:This a videogame, its not real life war, its supposed to be fun, its not fun if its unbalance and everyone is forced to use the same gear.
No it is not, agreed. Though I think the point I was trying to make is that CCP is ultimatly responsible for the imbalances, not the players. I have heard so many players beat down on the try hards, fotm users, Kdr whores, ect. They actually blame the health of the game on the very players that contribute to the health of the game.
So some players pub stomp, don't expect them to drop to your level for the sake of fairness. It takes a lot of time to get that proto, they worked for that gear. And by god I'm going to wear that gear and nothing but. That was the point of my SP was it not.
There are genuine issues with this game, but far too many think the issues are caused by the player, who has no control over anything design wise.
Proto stomp = matchmaking and tiers
Tryhards = proto stomp = refer above
FotM = gear imbalances
You should thank these players for making the issues so very clear.
Nuff Said
|
MINA Longstrike
2Shitz 1Giggle
233
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 21:23:00 -
[77] - Quote
Bethhy wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:Bethhy wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:Money in eve does not come from pvp. It comes from pve - high value moons & moon mining, ship production (capital, t2, t3) and sales, wormholes, research, lp sales, hauling, trading, incursions, missions, mining. It is incredibly rare to make money off of pvp - pvp is done mostly to deny resources and income to others, to safeguard ones 'territory' and because its fun.
Your analogy is flawed by the mere idea that the most money comes from pvp, while stuff like suicide tanking can be worth a bit it's not nearly as good income (or as consistent) as owning an r64 moon. WTF ??? Tech was about PVP not moon mining.... Sure you moon mined for it but it was the PVP that allowed it to happen. Same with Capital building in a giant open pvp zone.... If you said 0.0 Incursions produced the most ISK compared to others then sure.... even that has a huge element of PVP ask rooks and kings. Nothing happens in a giant 0.0 Open free pvp zone without it being directly related back to PVP. R64 moons were upwards of 20b isk monthly per moon and all you had to do was fuel the pos and empty the silos. Pvp was not a money generating activity Oh yea setting up then fueling the POS and moving out the stuff was easy as pie :p no PVP what so ever. or defense of said POS needed...
Pvp was to deny access of that asset to others, it didn't necessarily mean you gained control of it yourself, as said before pvp in the vast majority of cases is almost always a net LOSS of capital. It is supplemented through other things ie. you get to pvp because your alliance controls 300b worth of moons and has assets that make selling moon goo easy (jump bridges etc). The average player is also supplemented by being able to rat or run incursions.
Pvp is not an inherently money generating activity.
|
Darken-Soul
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
156
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 21:37:00 -
[78] - Quote
Tebu Gan wrote:sira draco wrote:This a videogame, its not real life war, its supposed to be fun, its not fun if its unbalance and everyone is forced to use the same gear. No it is not, agreed. Though I think the point I was trying to make is that CCP is ultimatly responsible for the imbalances, not the players. I have heard so many players beat down on the try hards, fotm users, Kdr whores, ect. They actually blame the health of the game on the very players that contribute to the health of the game. So some players pub stomp, don't expect them to drop to your level for the sake of fairness. It takes a lot of time to get that proto, they worked for that gear. And by god I'm going to wear that gear and nothing but. That was the point of my SP was it not. There are genuine issues with this game, but far too many think the issues are caused by the player, who has no control over anything design wise. Proto stomp = matchmaking and tiers Tryhards = proto stomp = refer above FotM = gear imbalances You should thank these players for making the issues so very clear even if you yourself refuse to see the truth of the situation.
We used to allow people out of the redline and capture points. You can't anymore. The default of most new players is bent over. It seems they are so used to getting ravaged they lost the will to fight at all. Even corps that rock proto come on strong for like a minute, then when you push they break. They just fall back and refuse to engage. Its sad that most players are acclimated to the New Eden welcome.
I am the real Darken
|
Bethhy
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
925
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 21:37:00 -
[79] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:
Pvp was to deny access of that asset to others, it didn't necessarily mean you gained control of it yourself, as said before pvp in the vast majority of cases is almost always a net LOSS of capital. It is supplemented through other things ie. you get to pvp because your alliance controls 300b worth of moons and has assets that make selling moon goo easy (jump bridges etc). The average player is also supplemented by being able to rat or run incursions.
Pvp is not an inherently money generating activity.
Just the means to do so. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |