DUST Search - CoD 514: Tank Expansion Pack

All Channels

General Discussions

CoD 514: Tank Expansion Pack

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Operative 1171 Aajli Bragian Order Amarr Empire 990	Posted - 2014.01.05 08:54:00 - [31] - Quote Make militia anything unable to be customized. You get the fit CCP deems worthy. That would fix a lot of things. Do your part. Join the revolution. Sabotage FW. Help this game burn! BURN DUST 2014
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1635	Posted - 2014.01.05 10:27:00 - [32] - Quote daishi mk03 wrote: lol, you destroyed every reasonable tank play in dust 514, now every scrub can take a mlt sica / 2 dmg mods and 2 shot everything. another thing, I really love this line "Tanks shouldnt be able to solo a team yet AV should be able to solo all vehicles " now you went fully ****, never go fully **** edit: of course 1 guy shouldn't be able to kill 16 guys, but 1 guy with AV should be able to kill 1 guy in a tank. So now you're against tanks? I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
daishi mk03 BLACK-GUARD Die Fremdenlegion 544	Posted - 2014.01.05 10:32:00 - [33] - Quote believe it or not, there are people like me who are not "against" or "in favor" of anything, but who just want to play a balanced game O.o. also, I really hope you enjoy your tank play now, every good tanker I know doesn't. (mainly because of mlt sicas with rails and 2 dmg mods) but yeah, you made it like this. I'm just glad I could switch fully into my ScR Assault. but yeah, you guys are like all the kids in this one special class, every school has. drawing trees all days, talking stuff nobody understands, walking against walls and dirtying their pants every hour. To know the true path, but yet, to never follow it. That is possibly the gravest sin. The Scriptures,Book of Missions
Lorhak Gannarsein 1133	Posted - 2014.01.05 10:38:00 - [34] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: daishi mk03 wrote: lol, you destroyed every reasonable tank play in dust 514, now every scrub can take a mlt sica / 2 dmg mods and 2 shot everything. another thing, I really love this line "Tanks shouldnt be able to solo a team yet AV should be able to solo all vehicles " now you went fully ****, never go fully **** edit: of course 1 guy shouldn't be able to kill 16 guys, but 1 guy with AV should be able to kill 1 guy in a tank. So now you're against tanks? Apparently he's just against you. PRO tanker and proud. Number of PRO-turret HAVs killed w/ my permahardened MLT Blaster Gunny - 2 (so far xD)
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 293	Posted - 2014.01.05 10:39:00 - [35] - Quote waaaa waaaa waaaa tank scrub this tank scub that, im not ur maid bltch
Jason Pearson 3785	Posted - 2014.01.05 10:40:00 - [36] - Quote Eh, I disagree about the whole "skill-less" thing, if anything it was simply rock up shoot til the other is dead, atleast now we've got a chance to pull back or time your modules right to kill the other, problem is when a double damage mod sica rocks up on a hilltop and two shots you because your hardeners weren't up. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire. You're a total git, Jason. - Kingbabar
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 293	Posted - 2014.01.05 10:43:00 - [37] - Quote av shouldnt have gotten nerfed thats all tanks are finally how they should be, and if you dont know how they should be the most important thing is being able to turn a profit on the investment without that they are o worthless crap
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 293	Posted - 2014.01.05 10:44:00 - [38] - Quote av shouldnt have gotten nerfed thats all tanks are finally how they should be, and if you dont know how they should be the most important thing is being able to turn a profit on the investment without that they are o worthless crap
daishi mk03 BLACK-GUARD Die Fremdenlegion 544	Posted - 2014.01.05 10:44:00 - [39] - Quote Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote: av shouldnt have gotten nerfed thats all tanks are finally how they should be, and if you dont know how they should be the most important thing is being able to turn a profit on the investment without that they are o worthless crap you shouldn't play naked on the beach, too much sand now. To know the true path, but yet, to never follow it. That is possibly the gravest sin. The Scriptures,Book of Missions
THEAMAZING POTHEAD Nyain San Renegade Alliance 747	Posted - 2014.01.05 10:55:00 - [40] - Quote Us AV dudes went to Railguns w/ damage mods because a militia railgun outclasses an officer forge gun. What you thought dudes who spent millions of SP to be able to kill JUST you guys would lay down & get r@ped by tanks? Fu*k no, we got no other reason for being in a rail tank other than to kill YO ass. Railguns always outclassed AV at being AV due to being stronger than an ishukone AFG yet having a 5x faster ROF w/ more continuous shots(overheat compared to reload) Now the damage has been bufffed, You've got 30% damage mods, near invincibility mods, all at a cheaper price than a super slow, infantry killable heavy suit. There IS NO REASON TO USE AV. AT ALL. That's "MR." Pothead to you.

daishi mk03 BLACK-GUARD Die Fremdenlegion 544	Posted - 2014.01.05 10:59:00 - [41] - Quote THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote: Us AV dudes went to Railguns w/ damage mods because a militia railgun outclasses an officer forge gun. What you thought dudes who spent millions of SP to be able to kill JUST you guys would lay down & get r@ped by tanks? Fuk no, we got no other reason for being in a rail tank other than to kill YO ass. Railguns always outclassed AV at being AV due to being stronger than an ishukone AFG yet having a 5x faster ROF w/ more continuous shots(overheat compared to reload) Now the damage has been bufffed, You've got 30% damage mods, near invincibility mods, all at a cheaper price than a super slow, infantry killable heavy suit. There IS NO REASON TO USE AV. AT ALL. lol, no, i laugh everytime a seasoned tanker cries about this, because they made it like this. just keep killing them with sicas :D To know the true path, but yet, to never follow it. That is possibly the gravest sin.* The Scriptures,Book of Missions
Charlotte O'Dell Fatal Absolution 1444	Posted - 2014.01.05 12:14:00 - [42] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: Eh, I disagree about the whole "skill-less" thing, if anything it was simply rock up shoot til the other is dead, atleast now we've got a chance to pull back or time your modules right to kill the other, problem is when a double damage mod sica rocks up on a hilltop and two shots you because your hardeners weren't up. Why can sicas even fit anything!? I don't care that I got 2-shotted. I care that it was a militia rail gun. Charlotte O'Dell is the highest level unicorn!
Jason Pearson 3785	Posted - 2014.01.05 12:17:00 - [43] - Quote Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Eh, I disagree about the whole "skill-less" thing, if anything it was simply rock up shoot til the other is dead, atleast now we've got a chance to pull back or time your modules right to kill the other, problem is when a double damage mod sica rocks up on a hilltop and two shots you because your hardeners weren't up. Why can sicas even fit anything!? I don't care that I got 2-shotted. I care that it was a militia rail gun. Why can Gunnlogis fit everything?! :P Rails are too strong, Militia gear works as well as Proto gear, everything is too cheap, CCP missed the bit where we wanted Risk v Reward for tanks, you know risk a lot for a good reward, risk ** all, get ** all kind of deal. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire. You're a total git, Jason. - Kingbabar
Charlotte O'Dell Fatal Absolution 1445	Posted - 2014.01.05 12:23:00 - [44] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Eh, I disagree about the whole "skill-less" thing, if anything it was simply rock up shoot til the other is dead, atleast now we've got a chance to pull back or time your modules right to kill the other, problem is when a double damage mod sica rocks up on a hilltop and two shots you because your hardeners weren't up. Why can sicas even fit anything!? I don't care that I got 2-shotted. I care that it was a militia rail gun. Why can Gunnlogis fit everything?! :P Rails are too strong, Militia gear works as well as Proto gear, everything is too cheap, CCP missed the bit where we wanted Risk v Reward for tanks, you know risk a lot for a good reward, risk ** all, get ** all kind of deal. CCP 8um fuc%ed up again . Charlotte O'Dell is the highest level unicorn!
BattleCry1791 PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies 294	Posted - 2014.01.05 12:33:00 - [45] - Quote Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: Tanks are not some elite tool, they should be accessible to both vet and new players. According to your "logic" so then should Duvalle ARs and Ishkune Sniper Rifles All aboard the MLT Failboat.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1639	Posted - 2014.01.06 07:37:00 - [46] - Quote Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: daishi mk03 wrote: lol, you destroyed every reasonable tank play in dust 514, now every scrub can take a mlt sica / 2 dmg mods and 2 shot everything. another thing, I really love this line "Tanks shouldnt be able to solo a team yet AV should be able to solo all vehicles " now you went fully ****, never go fully **** edit: of course 1 guy shouldn't be able to kill 16 guys, but 1 guy with AV should be able to kill 1 guy in a tank. So now you're against tanks? Apparently he's just against you. Of course he is. For no reason at all. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Rusty Shallows 692	Posted - 2014.01.06 08:28:00 - [47] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: snip Isnt it great Now we have infantry complaining about a 70k ISK tank when there proto AV costs 150k, but back in the day having a 1.7mil tank didnt mean you should insta pwn when a cheap AV fit should be able to kill any vehicle Tanks shouldnt be able to solo a team yet AV should be able to solo all vehicles There isn't a single person on these forums who has proposed Dropsuits should be able to tank multiple HAVs. Takahiro Kashuken wrote: AV should be the only counter to tanks Seriously? I can't think of a single person who has ever stated that. Takahiro Kashuken wrote: AV should be as powerful if not more powerful than a tank No one using Infantry-AV ever said the Large Rails made sense. On the contrary the Nerf Brigade used the state of Large Rails as an excuse for calling on FG nerfs. Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Tanks should take teamwork but AV shouldnt Pre-1.7 there were armor HAVs that required multiple AV. This is perhaps my favorite Spkr hypocritical deluded wisdom. His old sign with that was always good for a laugh. Takahiro Kashuken wrote: I love the double standards from infantry, just makes this patch sweeter Are you aware that claiming a HAV entitles one to a significant game advantage over another is the textbook definition of a Double Standard? MCC Lounge Lizard Forums > Game Fix the game CCP
Korvin Lomont United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION 430	Posted - 2014.01.06 09:46:00 - [48] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Eh, I disagree about the whole "skill-less" thing, if anything it was simply rock up shoot til the other is dead, atleast now we've got a chance to pull back or time your modules right to kill the other, problem is when a double damage mod sica rocks up on a hilltop and two shots you because your hardeners weren't up. Why can sicas even fit anything!? I don't care that I got 2-shotted. I care that it was a militia rail gun. Why can Gunnlogis fit everything?! :P Rails are too strong, Militia gear works as well as Proto gear, everything is too cheap, CCP missed the bit where we wanted Risk v Reward for tanks, you know risk a lot for a good reward, risk ** all, get ** all kind of deal. Honestly the price is not really the problem, its survivabillity paired with accessibillity. HAV Pilots need to make profit just as Infantry so I think the lowered price is rather justified (maybe a tweak here and there), but as any Infantry the HAV pilot risk his asset. Currently the only risk is another HAV. Thats not enough to balance the playing field. And even in this harsh AV infantry environment some tankers are constantly complaining about the new tactics that AV infantry came up with pretty fast.
Big miku Nation of Miku 322	Posted - 2014.01.06 11:28:00 - [49] - Quote The effectiveness of all militia vehicle mods and weaponry needs to be reduced, the inbalance lays in the fact that mlt gear is just as good as proto gear only it has a longer cool down. MLT gear should be all around worse, they need longer cool down, shorter active duration, less bonuses and higher cost.
Tebu Gan Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance 362	Posted - 2014.01.06 13:32:00 - [50] - Quote Charlotte O'Dell wrote: That is exactly what tank warfare has become. Everyone runs around the map full speed and insta-kills eachother. There is no skill left in it. Tanking is dead. More dead than it was in 1.6. I'm gonna go be a logi, again. Tanks are ruining this game. The True Tankers hate them. The infantry hate them. The only people who like 1.7 are the soma/sica spamming scrubs (PYREX- how dare you call yourself a 'tanker') Sure, prior 1.7, all tankers thought tanks were UP for their COST and they were- even non-tankers and AV agreed. I miss when tanking took skill. When this game was balanced (CHROMOSOME). Being a dropship, tank, or infantry should be equally rewarding. I want balance, please. Now fix tanks so scrubs don't use them for easy kills. Totally ******* agree. I couldn't believe they were going to start over with tanks back in 1.4 or whatever. Tanks were pretty solid pre 1.7, aside from the gunnlogi. But the gunnlogi didn't need huges buffs, speed change, better regen, and longer lasting hardeners, would have done the trick and put them on par with maddies. Agreed though, tanking prior to 1.7 took skill. If you weren't on top of your game, you were going to get blown up. And back then you rarely saw tanks out. Most matches were tank empty. I think it is very clear though, that they had made it far too easy. Tank battles are either nearly instantaneous, or turn into 2 tanks staring at each other as they wait for each others hardeners to drop. I said it a few days into 1.7, Tanking is now BORING. respec please. lol Nuff Said

Tebu Gan Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance 362	Posted - 2014.01.06 13:39:00 - [51] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Eh, I disagree about the whole "skill-less" thing, if anything it was simply rock up shoot til the other is dead, atleast now we've got a chance to pull back or time your modules right to kill the other, problem is when a double damage mod sica rocks up on a hilltop and two shots you because your hardeners weren't up. Why can sicas even fit anything!? I don't care that I got 2-shotted. I care that it was a militia rail gun. Why can Gunnlogis fit everything?! :P Rails are too strong, Militia gear works as well as Proto gear, everything is too cheap, CCP missed the bit where we wanted Risk v Reward for tanks, you know risk a lot for a good reward, risk ** all, get all kind of deal. To all pre 1.7 maddie pilots, HAHA. How's it feel to be the little brother of the gunnlogi for a change???? But yeah, F duel damage modded Sicas. And I think it takes at least 3 shots. This is why I now run double hardeners and a booster on my tank. More than a few mitia tanks have ** themselves when they actually had to reload. But by then they are already dead! Nuff Said
Sextus Hardcock 0uter.Heaven 188	Posted - 2014.01.06 13:43:00 - [52] - Quote Monty Mole Clone wrote: make it take skill to drive a tank, take away 3rd person view and give them manual gears with seperate hull/movement controls tanks are now not just big cheapass toys ok never mind the manual gears but, take away third person view. I can't see from a perspective 4 meters above my mercs head, why should I suddenly get this ability in a tank?
NAV HIV The Generals General Tso's Alliance 724	Posted - 2014.01.09 16:51:00 - [53] - Quote Bump .... Tank vs AV not what suit bonuses are OP... Won't be able to wear the suit and walk around if AVs are not balanced
Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 5441	Posted - 2014.01.09 17:05:00 - [54] - Quote Charlotte. Every single ounce of respect I lost to you in the past has been restored, and then I made a bigger container to store even more respect. You have earned the Cat of Honor badge. Wear it with pride. Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives. Tuna > Tacos
Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 5442	Posted - 2014.01.09 17:11:00 - [55] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: daishi mk03 wrote: You, Spkr, Takahiro and many others are responsible for this. Constant QQ and now we are here, Isnt it great Now we have infantry complaining about a 70k ISK tank when there proto AV costs 150k, but back in the day having a 1.7mil tank didnt mean you should insta pwn when a cheap AV fit should be able to kill any vehicle Tanks shouldnt be able to solo a team yet AV should be able to solo all vehicles AV should be the only counter to tanks AV should be as powerful if not more powerful than a tank Tanks should take teamwork but AV shouldnt etc etc etc I love the double standards from infantry, just makes this patch sweeter You're comparing inherently different units. Tanks are much higher on the strategic scale, they can alone sway battlefields by pushing the entire enemy team back and forcing people to switch to AV, while your team wipes the floor with them. That alone should mean they cost more. But that also means AV should be an effective counter, because they suck at anti infantry, and if they suck at AV too they might as well call in a tank themselves that costs less. Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives. Tuna > Tacos
R F Gyro Clones 4u 922	Posted - 2014.01.09 17:18:00 - [56] - Quote Charlotte O'Dell wrote: That is exactly what tank warfare has become. Everyone runs around the map full speed and insta-kills eachother. There is no skill left in it. Tanking is dead. More dead than it was in 1.6. I'm gonna go be a logi, again. Tanks are ruining this game. The True Tankers hate them. The infantry hate them. The only people who like 1.7 are the soma/sica spamming scrubs (PYREX- how dare you call yourself a 'tanker') Sure, prior 1.7, all tankers thought tanks were UP for their COST and they were- even non-tankers and AV agreed. I miss when tanking took skill. When this game was balanced (CHROMOSOME). Being a dropship, tank, or infantry should be equally rewarding. I want balance, please. Now fix tanks so scrubs don't use them for easy kills. Any suggestions to how to balance tanks against infantry? Bearing in mind the key constraints:- 1. HAVs can't be inherently "better" than infantry or we get the current madness 2. HAVs have to "feel" like tanks: massive, powerful machines of destruction RF Gyro: 12.5% damage bonus; 10.5% rate of fire bonus
NAV HIV The Generals General Tso's Alliance 727	Posted - 2014.01.09 17:21:00 - [57] - Quote R F Gyro wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: That is exactly what tank warfare has become. Everyone runs around the map full speed and insta-kills eachother. There is no skill left in it. Tanking is dead. More dead than it was in 1.6. I'm gonna go be a logi, again. Tanks are ruining this game. The True Tankers hate them. The infantry hate them. The only people who like 1.7 are the soma/sica spamming scrubs (PYREX- how dare you call yourself a 'tanker') Sure, prior 1.7, all tankers thought tanks were UP for their COST and they were- even non-tankers and AV agreed. I miss when tanking took skill. When this game was balanced (CHROMOSOME). Being a dropship, tank, or infantry should be equally rewarding. I want balance, please. Now fix tanks so scrubs don't use them for easy kills. Any suggestions to how to balance tanks against infantry? Bearing in mind the key constraints:- 1. HAVs can't be inherently "better" than infantry or we get the current madness 2. HAVs have to "feel" like tanks: massive, powerful machines of destruction keep the tanks the way they are now and Bring backs AV's to how they were
noob cavman Tickle My Null-Sac 371	Posted - 2014.01.09 17:37:00 - [58] - Quote Who needs a mlt tank to kill other mlt tanks? I have a bpo lav and level 5 in demolition Hey mlt tank guess what my lav is ready and I GOT TWO TICKETS TO PARADISE!!! Renegade minja fighting for the empress
NAV HIV The Generals General Tso's Alliance 733	Posted - 2014.01.09 17:49:00 - [59] - Quote noob cavman wrote: Who needs a mlt tank to kill other mlt tanks? I have a bpo lav and level 5 in demolition That works too !!!
T'orq DUST University Ivy League 107	Posted - 2014.01.09 18:10:00 - [60] - Quote If you have seen me in a mlt tank it is to counter other tanks. I do not stack damage mods on it. I am trying two hardeners armor repair and rail ammo on a sica. No I am not a tanker, but I go to a tank if there is more than one or two on the enemy team. I have killed infantry with it, but it is harder to get them with a railgun than a blaster or missile. I agree some thing needs done to them Thanjac- Proud Member of Commando 6 Commando Lives



Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.