|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Shouper of BHD
Better Hide R Die
295
   |
Posted - 2013.12.30 20:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
its actually the way it should be, as a role in needs to be affordable, the issue is AV isn`t acting as a role as in its not being able to form its circle of the vehicle > infrantry, infantry > AV, AV > vehicles. it was an on going issue in privies builds (you CAN go and find them through forum history or thinking back). AV were doing there job destroying vehicles left and right although hated by vehicles its required, what wasn`t required was the cost of the vehicles, you can`t have strong AV and costly vehicles, that being said you can`t have cheap vehicles and weak AV. cheap vehicles (so its affordable as a role, LIKE any other role) and strong AV to keep the circle of battle life and to keep their role fed is needed, also lets be serious PRO infantrry gear can do asmuch damage as a tank (or the same thing just a squad of PRO or tanks) could do to infrantry, remember the infamous 'PROTO STOP" threads? why shouldn`t a anti infrantry role be that good against infrantry? well answer to that is becuse of a weak conuter to it but the counter to it isn`t going back to the wheel, it was only like 2 builds ago yet you complain that CCP is repeating itself... face it your doing that! AV needs a buff not vehicles need to cost more, that being said that its good to note that vehicles don`t have all there type of gear and the ones they do it only has 1 category of an average of 3-4 also the huals are STD, balancing AV needs to wait till vehicles are done or we are comparing PRO HMGs to STD assualt roles right before we add the rest of assualt (not real, its theorietrical, assualt has its STD-PRO). also note AV vehicles are better then AV since AV can`t beat AV vehicles since they can`t even beat vehicles that are anti infrantry so I put AV vehicles in the vehicle catigory since that makes sense, AV infrantry needs a buff (the only AV vehicle in need of a buff are small railguns). |
Shouper of BHD
Better Hide R Die
295
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 20:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
N1ck Comeau wrote:if tanks are cheap people will spam them. increase cost to basically limit tankers to 1 a game or they lose some serious isk.
or buff AV.
buff AV as I said in the OP, let them eat cake? no LET THEM SPAM TANKS then, the AVs (being buffed) will gain so much for their role and the tankers will go bankrupt becuse you won`t be able to do stomp tactics. in the last build vehicle users had to bubble rap their vehicle becuse they could loose it easily against AV, THATS GOOD thats the circle but it costing them everything makes no sense. A tank will do as good against infantry with an AV guy hunting him down asmuch as an AV guy would do against tanks while being hunted down by an anti infrantry. also theres the concern of 1 AV against a squad of tanks, well how well do you aspect an infrantry squad could do against 1 anti infrantry, yes the swarm tactic works in all books but there will plenty of AV, chances are more then there are tanks (just like last build infact!!!). so its not like that at all. |
Shouper of BHD
Better Hide R Die
295
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 21:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
also if they added damage points for WP when giving damage to vehicles it would make alot of sense, so even if the vehicle escapes with a fuel mod or becuse your just 1 man YOU gain for YOUR role, it shouldn`t require a role to be a squad, even if you are outmatched you are doing your role right? so you should be rewarded not punished by not playing the current numbers game. |
|
|
| |
|