| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2478
   |
Posted - 2013.12.24 19:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
Going to allow pilots to use a MLT HAVs as a scapegoat for the AV problem while they secretly justify the power of STD HAVs with the "I threw ISK/SP at it, so I should stomp", argument?
-HAND
We finally deployed in the MinFW Match!
\o/
|
DeadlyAztec11
Ostrakon Agency
Gallente Federation
2904
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 19:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
Probably until 1.8.
»We still have our honor!
|
Anmol Singh
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
627
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 19:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Going to allow pilots to use a MLT HAVs as a scapegoat for the AV problem while they secretly justify the power of STD HAVs with the "I threw ISK/SP at it, so I should stomp", argument?
-HAND
F*CK RAILGUNS!!
Sagaris lover!!!
Commando <3
|
Flix Keptick
Red Star.
EoN.
1804
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 19:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Instead of trying to start a flame war, why aren't you pressuring CCP about releasing webifiers and the rest of the racial AV?
Lack of content makes stuff broken...
G˙åTank driverG˙å
|
Rusty Shallows
585
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 19:48:00 -
[5] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Probably until 1.8.
Optimist.  *crosses fingers*
Any-hooooo I'm just amused that the Nerfing was so successful it is becoming an "in-house" issue for some people.
MCC Lounge Lizard
Forums > Game
Fix the game CCP
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2479
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 19:52:00 -
[6] - Quote
Flix Keptick wrote:Instead of trying to start a flame war, why aren't you pressuring CCP about releasing webifiers and the rest of the racial AV?
Not starting a flame war, just stating the obvious fact that was proven multipule times by what pilots have been posting in threads about V/AV balance.
Pushing for content? You and I both know that I'd be SoonGäķ'd to all hell.
Can't balance around content that doesn't exist, which is exactly why roles like the Scout are in the situation they are in now.
We finally deployed in the MinFW Match!
\o/
|
Nocturnal Soul
Immortal Retribution
1339
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 19:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
Well I'm about a good.... oh...you should change your title.
"The trick to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources..." Albert Einstein
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2480
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:01:00 -
[8] - Quote
Nocturnal Soul wrote:Well I'm about a good.... oh...you should change your title.
Done.
We finally deployed in the MinFW Match!
\o/
|
Gods Architect
Pradox One
Proficiency V.
1045
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:07:00 -
[9] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Going to allow pilots to use a MLT HAVs as a scapegoat for the AV problem while they secretly justify the power of STD HAVs with the "I threw ISK/SP at it, so I should stomp", argument?
-HAND
Isn't that the argument you tankers made?? "My 10 mil SP and my 2.3 mil isk tank shouldn't be dropped by avd AV." Our augment now is that "My proto AV should be able to drop a soma at least!"
I created Heaven and Hell I am God's Architect
Dust Illuminati soldier
Member of the Godslayer Gang and King of RP
|
Insufficient Data
Tickle My Null-Sac
2
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
Not hard taking out tanks thanks to reduced speed. Theres many ways like proto packed Lai Dai/Allotek Flux grenade, Wyrko swarm launcher with prof to LV3.+ complex dmg. Mods, jihad LAV with RE, Forge gunner and tanking yourself. If a merc simply adjusts their playstyle then tanks won't be a big issue. It's like the noobs of New Eden need a mom like figure to guide them by the hand.
When you Tickle My Null Sac the Canon shall appear. XD
|
|
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1569
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:10:00 -
[11] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Going to allow pilots to use a MLT HAVs as a scapegoat for the AV problem while they secretly justify the power of STD HAVs with the "I threw ISK/SP at it, so I should stomp", argument?
-HAND
"You AV guys" as if he isn't included in that.
Infantry cries for tank changes, and they don't like them. Tell them to use vehicles, they complain, and use cars anyway
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2480
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:15:00 -
[12] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Atiim wrote:Going to allow pilots to use a MLT HAVs as a scapegoat for the AV problem while they secretly justify the power of STD HAVs with the "I threw ISK/SP at it, so I should stomp", argument?
-HAND "You AV guys" as if he isn't included in that.
I'm as AV as I am a tanker. (by technicality)
We finally deployed in the MinFW Match!
\o/
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2480
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:16:00 -
[13] - Quote
Gods Architect wrote:Atiim wrote:Going to allow pilots to use a MLT HAVs as a scapegoat for the AV problem while they secretly justify the power of STD HAVs with the "I threw ISK/SP at it, so I should stomp", argument?
-HAND Isn't that the argument you tankers made?? "My 10 mil SP and my 2.3 mil isk tank shouldn't be dropped by avd AV." Our augment now is that "My proto AV should be able to drop a soma at least!"
I think you have a backwards perspective of things.
We finally deployed in the MinFW Match!
\o/
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1569
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:17:00 -
[14] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Atiim wrote:Going to allow pilots to use a MLT HAVs as a scapegoat for the AV problem while they secretly justify the power of STD HAVs with the "I threw ISK/SP at it, so I should stomp", argument?
-HAND "You AV guys" as if he isn't included in that. I'm as AV as I am a tanker. (by technicality)
So terrible at both?
Infantry cries for tank changes, and they don't like them. Tell them to use vehicles, they complain, and use cars anyway
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2480
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:19:00 -
[15] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Atiim wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Atiim wrote:Going to allow pilots to use a MLT HAVs as a scapegoat for the AV problem while they secretly justify the power of STD HAVs with the "I threw ISK/SP at it, so I should stomp", argument?
-HAND "You AV guys" as if he isn't included in that. I'm as AV as I am a tanker. (by technicality) So terrible at both?
Nope. More like:
Used to love them both to death, but now refuses to touch them.
We finally deployed in the MinFW Match!
\o/
|
Ghosts Chance
Inf4m0us
580
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
how long are you going to ***** rather the blow them up?
right now jihad jeeps/ remote explsives/ proxies and combo attacks get rid of them just fine |
drake sadani
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
123
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:28:00 -
[17] - Quote
every time someone starts a tank thread and the response is use proto AV gear i drink .
who wants to donate a liver .
also the problem being already stated elsewhere . when you start the game it has a suit called ANTI ARMOR
that cannot deal with armor of the same level that right there should be the indication that there is a problem
not everybody has proto AV gear . that's pretty damn expensive stuff . SP and ISK wise.
if you want to keep players and attract players . a tank should be a battlefield asset yes . but it should not be a win button .
when the other team starts to loose . i see RDV'S blacken the sky like a swarm of vengeful undead horrors .
it's not because they are desperate, it's not because they are invested in this battle .
it's because MLT and STD anti armor pose barely any threat to them .
and i agree you cannot balance around content you don't have but modification of content thats already there is possibl |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2480
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:29:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ghosts Chance wrote:how long are you going to ***** rather the blow them up?
right now jihad jeeps/ remote explsives/ proxies and combo attacks get rid of them just fine
Statement has next to nothing to do with my message to the AV community'
Off Topic: I saw you in a match yesterday, and you blew the LAV that some blue hijacked. And right when I was about to pull out the Kaalikiota RR I dc'd.
FML
We finally deployed in the MinFW Match!
\o/
|
Ghosts Chance
Inf4m0us
584
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:42:00 -
[19] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:how long are you going to ***** rather the blow them up?
right now jihad jeeps/ remote explsives/ proxies and combo attacks get rid of them just fine Statement has next to nothing to do with my message to the AV community' Off Topic: I saw you in a match yesterday, and you blew the LAV that some blue hijacked. And right when I was about to pull out the Kaalikiota RR I dc'd. FML
wierdly im in favor of an AV buff (as opposed to a tank nerf)
i just hate when people keep beating a dead horse about it instead of adapting against the tanks and giving them hell while they wait for a fix.
yah yah tanks are a ***** to kill with the best of tools, everyone knows and a fix is coming eventually.
in the meantime buck up and make em explode, pub matches mean nothing anyways and if you run with a squad instakilling tanks is still pretty easy if you have enough teamwork on your side, baiting a tank into a bad position then letting all hell lose on it is quite fun.
objectives with supply depots are key, just have everyone in squad have an AV fit made and ready for each type of tank and when one comes a knocking switch over and send him back to the clone vat.
|
knight of 6
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
898
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:44:00 -
[20] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Going to allow pilots to use a MLT HAVs as a scapegoat for the AV problem while they secretly justify the power of STD HAVs with the "I threw ISK/SP at it, so I should stomp", argument?
-HAND
how many times are you going to slightly rephrase your OP and make new threads out of it?
"God favors the side with the best artillery" ~ Napoleon
Ko6, scout, tanker.
CLOSED BETA VET
|
|
|
Ghosts Chance
Inf4m0us
584
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:45:00 -
[21] - Quote
knight of 6 wrote:Atiim wrote:Going to allow pilots to use a MLT HAVs as a scapegoat for the AV problem while they secretly justify the power of STD HAVs with the "I threw ISK/SP at it, so I should stomp", argument?
-HAND how many times are you going to slightly rephrase your OP and make new threads out of it?
probably at least 3 times a day going by his thread history :P |
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe.
Public Disorder.
2434
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:48:00 -
[22] - Quote
I think it'll be great when vehicles have capacitors. I think everything would be fine if there were capacitors to ensure there's never maximum rep and maximum damage output virtually nonstop.
Remove time in battle from ISK payout formula and provide a bonus to winning team... Watch battles become fun again.
|
IMPAIRS YOUR ABILITY
Molon Labe.
Public Disorder.
251
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:55:00 -
[23] - Quote
Lol you all killed the heavy role 18 months ago you get what you deserve. The HMG adjustment is so late most players who wanted to take on the heavy role left a long time ago. Know what's funnier than watching people get kicked in the nuts? Watching a swarm launcher chase an HAV. |
Commander Tzu
L.O.T.I.S.
110
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 21:05:00 -
[24] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Going to allow pilots to use a MLT HAVs as a scapegoat for the AV problem while they secretly justify the power of STD HAVs with the "I threw ISK/SP at it, so I should stomp", argument?
-HAND
You mean the same argument you and the other AVers used on the forums to justify AV being so ridiculously strong pre-1.7 Uprising? |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
634
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 22:10:00 -
[25] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Going to allow pilots to use a MLT HAVs as a scapegoat for the AV problem while they secretly justify the power of STD HAVs with the "I threw ISK/SP at it, so I should stomp", argument?
-HAND
This game is millions of years in the future and the swarm launcher is only capable of locking on up to 175m. That makes no sense. This game might as well be modern warfare. A stinger missile can have a greater lock on range than this thing. I thought the Caldari were all about long range. Well good work messing up the lore CCP. All for that sake of something as pointless as balance. No game will ever achieve balance or even get close to it. Something will always be super powerful. But sadly grown adults who act like children will never understand that. |
Soulja Ghostface
MCDUSTDONALDS
Zero-Day
2121
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 22:17:00 -
[26] - Quote
the first gun i skilled into was swarm launcher
even it it was only 1 level
I PITY THE FOOL WHO GOT 40+ KILLS BUT LOST +5 EXPENSIVE FITTINGS
*I RESPECT THE MAN THAT GOT 3 KILLS
|
Darken-Sol
BIG BAD W0LVES
1033
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 22:18:00 -
[27] - Quote
Commander Tzu wrote:Atiim wrote:Going to allow pilots to use a MLT HAVs as a scapegoat for the AV problem while they secretly justify the power of STD HAVs with the "I threw ISK/SP at it, so I should stomp", argument?
-HAND You mean the same argument you and the other AVers used on the forums to justify AV being so ridiculously strong pre-1.7 Uprising?
I got into tanking in 1.6. It was great fun. A real test of skill.
the tanks now days take no skill.
There was a time we fought good tankers. Now we just fight good tanks.
|
Benjamin Ciscko
The Generals
General Tso's Alliance
453
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 22:34:00 -
[28] - Quote
Since when was it a scape goat?
Tanker/Assault
Can I have my ADV and PRO tanks now (Honeyed Lamb enroute).
|
Tech Ohm Eaven
L.O.T.I.S.
D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1002
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 22:49:00 -
[29] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Going to allow pilots to use a MLT HAVs as a scapegoat for the AV problem while they secretly justify the power of STD HAVs with the "I threw ISK/SP at it, so I should stomp", argument?
-HAND
The only PS3 exclusive that I am waiting on is FFX HD in March.
And once April hits the question becomes :
If I have a PS4 then why do I need a PS3??
Tick, tock CCP.
Abandon Ship!, Abandon Ship!!
Jumps into escape pod!
Selected destination Planet PS4.
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2491
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 23:16:00 -
[30] - Quote
knight of 6 wrote:Atiim wrote:Going to allow pilots to use a MLT HAVs as a scapegoat for the AV problem while they secretly justify the power of STD HAVs with the "I threw ISK/SP at it, so I should stomp", argument?
-HAND how many times are you going to slightly rephrase your OP and make new threads out of it?
This topic is not similar, nor does it have the same points made in other threads by me.
As soon as pilots decide to stop making more than 1 thread about vehicles, then I'll start making only one thread about AV, and simply editing it.
We finally deployed in the MinFW Match!
\o/
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |