DUST Search - [Discussion] Hit Detection is Great; Tone back Aim Assist?

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

[Discussion] Hit Detection is Great; Tone back Aim Assist?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Funkmaster Whale Whale Farm 1141	Posted - 2013.11.17 19:51:00 - [1] - Quote I'm wondering what people would think about toning back the aim assist back to what it was before (before magnetism and adhesion) and simply keep aim friction. People have been complaining about low TTK since 1.6 hit. Before, gunfights were increasingly difficult because lack of aim assist and crap hit detection made kills take longer. Now, with most bullets registering AND having our reticles stick to targets makes it a "who shot first" sort of twitch shooter. The skill in aiming was taken away because hit detection was not yet up to par. Now with hit detection actually working as intended, do you think it's time we take a look at aim assist again? This was a huge topic of discussion when it first hit and I still think it's the most pervading issue in regards to the low TTK. Let me play you the song of my people!
Joel II X AHPA 164	Posted - 2013.11.17 20:19:00 - [2] - Quote My shotgun shells only work 80% of the time. Should be 100%. Not only that, but it fires a second later after I click the trigger. Hit detection still needs work. But yeah, remove aim assist.
Arkena Wyrnspire Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance 5170	Posted - 2013.11.17 20:53:00 - [3] - Quote Agreed. Level 5 Forum Warrior Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution Supporter of CCP raRaRa.
Stephen Seneca Templis Dragoons 5	Posted - 2013.11.17 21:43:00 - [4] - Quote Agreed.
zibathy numbertwo Nox Aeterna Security 264	Posted - 2013.11.17 21:58:00 - [5] - Quote Agreed. Long Live Freedom; Long Live the Federation.
Sky Kage Clones Of The Damned 60	Posted - 2013.11.17 21:59:00 - [6] - Quote Agreed. I see a pattern... I die alot AND have fun... Who knew?
Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 4524	Posted - 2013.11.17 22:08:00 - [7] - Quote Disagree C-C-C-C-COMBO BREKAER! Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives.
Dominus Fatali Nox Aeterna Security 663	Posted - 2013.11.17 22:30:00 - [8] - Quote Agreed. Long Live Freedom; Long Live the Federation.
Aeon Amadi A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. Renegade Alliance 3785	Posted - 2013.11.17 22:31:00 - [9] - Quote Take off Aim Assist and we're back to Mass Drivers and Grenades being the only usable weapons, especially considering the camera jerk. If you can prevent the enemy from being able to aim at you you've effectively found the best tanking method in the game - hence why Shield tanking worked as well as it did back in the day. Game needs aim assist, that much is for certain, due to the jerky control scheme that is an analog controller. One thing I'd like to point out, just as well, is that this isn't an option that's available to just me or the guy next to me - it's available to everyone. If you have an issue with it and you think it's this big, over-powering thing... Turn it on! I've seen the same argument for -every- First Person Shooter game that's come out including Call of Duty and Battlefield. The Aim Assist isn't nearly as bad as the Dust 514 forums leads it on to be. Black Ops 2 had the most ridiculous Aim Assist There's no greater annoyance than aiming at someone and having someone else walk in front of them to pull your aim off. So, no, I disagree with this if only because this game fields the most comprehensive Aim Assist I've seen in a first person shooter. It still requires a great deal of skill and it doesn't 'lead' targets as many people say it does, it will follow them to some degree but you still have to put some effort to stay on target, as opposed to a game like Call of Duty. Edit: If you don't believe me, try not moving the right analog stick at all when aiming at someone and see how well it works out for you. ANON Diplomat -//- I Support SP Rollover ^_^
medomai grey WarRavens League of Infamy 352	Posted - 2013.11.17 22:36:00 - [10] - Quote We don't have aim friction, only aim adhesion. Also toning down aim assist won't really address the short TTK. Blatant Dust_514 recruiting in the silliest of places. :P

FAKIR REDETTa Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 0	Posted - 2013.11.17 22:38:00 - [11] - Quote Funkmaster Whale wrote: I'm wondering what people would think about toning back the aim assist back to what it was before (before magnetism and adhesion) and simply keep aim friction. People have been complaining about low TTK since 1.6 hit. Before, gunfights were increasingly difficult because lack of aim assist and crap hit detection made kills take longer. Now, with most bullets registering AND having our reticles stick to targets makes it a "who shot first" sort of twitch shooter. The skill in aiming was taken away because hit detection was not yet up to par. Now with hit detection actually working as intended, do you think it's time we take a look at aim assist again? This was a huge topic of discussion when it first hit and I still think it's the most pervading issue in regards to the low TTK. no suck my . pÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûäGûêGûÇGûêGûÇGûêGûä pÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûäGûêGûÇpÇÇpÇÇGûêpÇÇpÇÇGûÇGûêGûä pÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûäGûêGûÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûÇGûêGûä pÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûêpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûê pÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûêpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûê pÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûÇGûêGûäGûäpÇÇpÇÇGûêpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûäGûêGûÇ pÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûêpÇÇpÇÇGûäGûÇGûäpÇÇpÇÇGûê pÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûêpÇÇGûÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûÇpÇÇGûê pÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûêpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûê pÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûêpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûê pÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûêpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇ pÇÇpÇÇ Gûê pÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûêpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûê pÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûêpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûê pÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûäGûêGûÇGûÇGûêGûäGûêpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûêGûäGûêGûÇGûêGûä pÇÇGûäGûêGûÇGûÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûÇGûÇGûê GûêGûÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûÇGûê GûêpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûê GûêpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûäGûêGûäpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûê GûÇGûêpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûêGûÇpÇÇGûÇGûêpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûêGûÇ pÇÇGûÇGûêGûäpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûêGûÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûÇGûêpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûäGûêGûÇ pÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûÇGûêGûäGûäGûäGûêGûÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇpÇÇGûÇGûêGûäGûäGûäGûêGûÇ
Cosgar ParagonX 7878	Posted - 2013.11.17 22:57:00 - [12] - Quote It's not just aim assist that's the problem. I tried to put a level into Amarr Commando once, but got a server notification saying "Why?"
Ulysses Knapse duna corp 595	Posted - 2013.11.17 23:13:00 - [13] - Quote Somehow it feels like hit detection is the same for me as it's always been, but for everyone else it's gotten much better. I want an explanation for this dissonance. Humanity is the personification of change.
Meeko Fent Commando Perkone Caldari State 1572	Posted - 2013.11.17 23:14:00 - [14] - Quote medomai grey wrote: We don't have aim friction, only aim adhesion. Also toning down aim assist won't really address the short TTK. coughBothcough "Autoaim" doesn't Lock on target Only works when aiming DIRECTLY at target Go and play COD or BF, and you WILL notice how the game basically clicks your gun directly on the enemy, with out any help from you. DUST doesn't do that COD and BF have the Aim slow down when just on target in general. DUST doesn't do that. SOURCE Conclusion- DUST has one of the softest Aim Assist out there. For the State! For Caldari FW join Caldari Hierarchy Replication Warrior
Meeko Fent Commando Perkone Caldari State 1572	Posted - 2013.11.17 23:15:00 - [15] - Quote Ulysses Knapse wrote: Somehow it feels like hit detection is the same for me as it's always been, but for everyone else it's gotten much better. I want an explanation for this dissonance. Same here. For the State! For Caldari FW join Caldari Hierarchy Replication Warrior
dmitri soroka The Generals EoN. 14	Posted - 2013.11.17 23:42:00 - [16] - Quote Funkmaster Whale wrote: I'm wondering what people would think about toning back the aim assist back to what it was before (before magnetism and adhesion) and simply keep aim friction. People have been complaining about low TTK since 1.6 hit. Before, gunfights were increasingly difficult because lack of aim assist and crap hit detection made kills take longer. Now, with most bullets registering AND having our reticles stick to targets makes it a "who shot first" sort of twitch shooter. The skill in aiming was taken away because hit detection was not yet up to par. Now with hit detection actually working as intended, do you think it's time we take a look at aim assist again? This was a huge topic of discussion when it first hit and I still think it's the most pervading issue in regards to the low TTK. I challenge your hit detection, it is only good with AIM ASSIST, and only specific guns, such as pray and spray. Also guns are over powered for suit category. But i guess it is based on flavor you like of game play. I see assault players take out Heavies with easy like there is nothing to do. But reality is, it should be opposite lol. LIke a chain reaction.
dmitri soroka The Generals EoN. 14	Posted - 2013.11.17 23:49:00 - [17] - Quote Joel II X wrote: My shotgun shells only work 80% of the time. Should be 100%. Not only that, but it fires a second later after I click the trigger. Hit detection still needs work. But yeah, remove aim assist. Yes this engine is only good right now for spray and pray. If you have a sniper rifle notice, after you have cursor over a enemy it takes about 1+ seconds to detect hit boxes. SO unless you spray and pray like a fool average gun you have about 50% of registering bcs you moving fast around corners and enemy also moves in and out of cursor. Now if they nurf AR against heavies so it takes longer to take out heavy while heave on distance with splat Assault Suit, every one will complain that it is over powered but in reality engine registration just BLOWS. Now if you take AR and do one shot hits while moving cursor of and on a enemy. no shots will register. If ou have aim assist it will register all of them, bcs at works just like an aimbot. If they enable AIM assist on all devices and for all weapons, it will be more fair. I am actually deciding to contact PSN and notify that DUST is kind of abusing their game to force people to spend more money as they lose suits they buy with cash, and it is kind of a FRAUD. BCS a noob suit can KILL WAR suit just bcs of shots not registering, NOT LAG but issues in engine. :)
hgghyujh Expert Intervention Caldari State 165	Posted - 2013.11.18 00:45:00 - [18] - Quote mmmmmm aim assist is a crutch anyways so what ever, personally I would rather see an increase in base HP because if you play in matches with pros they will still drop you in a fraction of a second with out aim assist.
SponkSponkSponk The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine 521	Posted - 2013.11.18 01:13:00 - [19] - Quote I'm on the fence with aim assist, but I do think that fully-automatic fire should disable aim assist until turned off. "Pulvis et umbra sumus. (We are but dust and shadow.)" GÇò Horace, The Odes of Horace
Talos Vagheitan Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance 216	Posted - 2013.11.18 03:39:00 - [20] - Quote Everyone who agreed with this post should take a look at my auto aim suggestion here: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1493002#post1493002 Basically, slightly draw back AA as weapon tier increases: Reward skilled players, reduce TTK, reduce pumpstomping Who cares what some sniper has to say

Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 4543	Posted - 2013.11.18 08:22:00 - [21] - Quote Cosgar wrote: It's not just aim assist that's the problem. People who use that are few and far inbetween. Get over it. I know aim assist hurts you beceause you're a MD user, but hey, now people can actually retaliate against a weapon that requires zero aiming Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives.
Draco Cerberus Hell's Gate Inc 510	Posted - 2013.11.18 14:13:00 - [22] - Quote Aim assist? Is it really this broken? *One Universe...with friendly fire and Open World Game Play for all!*
Draco Cerberus Hell's Gate Inc 510	Posted - 2013.11.18 14:15:00 - [23] - Quote Cat Merc wrote: Cosgar wrote: It's not just aim assist that's the problem. People who use that are few and far inbetween. Get over it. I know aim assist hurts you beceause you're a MD user, but hey, now people can actually retaliate against a weapon that requires zero aiming I am slightly offended by that comment Cat. It takes a great deal of skill to calculate the trajectory of the MD to land shells on people's heads and anyone else able to do it has skill. *One Universe...with friendly fire and Open World Game Play for all!*
medomai grey WarRavens League of Infamy 355	Posted - 2013.11.18 14:33:00 - [24] - Quote Meeko Fent wrote: medomai grey wrote: We don't have aim friction, only aim adhesion. Also toning down aim assist won't really address the short TTK. coughBothcough "Autoaim" doesn't Lock on target Only works when aiming DIRECTLY at target Go and play COD or BF, and you WILL notice how the game basically clicks your gun directly on the enemy, with out any help from you. DUST doesn't do that COD and BF have the Aim slow down when just on target in general. DUST doesn't do that. SOURCE Conclusion- DUST has one of the softest Aim Assist out there. We have aim-assist, not auto-aim. There's a bid difference between the 2. I never state that AA(aim-assist) locks on to targets. AA actually only kicks in when you directly aim at a target; I have no idea why you claim it doesn't. Once you lock on to a target, the aiming reticle will follow the target to a very limited degree. The aiming reticle doesn't slow down over targets so much as it lightly sticks to them. Thus we don't have aim friction, only aim adhesion. Either your English sucks and you aren't correctly conveying your thoughts or your the kind of knuckle head that argues with someone you mostly agree with. Blatant Dust_514 recruiting in the silliest of places. :P
Funkmaster Whale Whale Farm 1171	Posted - 2013.11.18 22:56:00 - [25] - Quote medomai grey wrote: We have aim-assist, not auto-aim. There's a bid difference between the 2. I never state that AA(aim-assist) locks on to targets. AA actually only kicks in when you directly aim at a target; I have no idea why you claim it doesn't. Once you lock on to a target, the aiming reticle will follow the target to a very limited degree. The aiming reticle doesn't slow down over targets so much as it lightly sticks to them. Thus we don't have aim friction, only aim adhesion. Either your English sucks and you aren't correctly conveying your thoughts or your the kind of knuckle head that argues with someone you mostly agree with. Quote: The assists in question are magnetism and adhesion. Magnetism works by helping you maintain your aim as you strafe a target. Adhesion adjusts your rotation when an enemy is targeted to help you stay on target. Fine-tuning Aiming Dev Blog Just for reference. Let me play you the song of my people!
KA24DERT Pure Innocence. EoN. 259	Posted - 2013.11.19 00:01:00 - [26] - Quote Agree. Removing aim assist from the game is the first step in balancing the rifles.
Funkmaster Whale Fatal Absolution 1172	Posted - 2013.11.21 16:06:00 - [27] - Quote KA24DERT wrote: Agree. Removing aim assist from the game is the first step in balancing the rifles. They worked so hard to bring it back that I doubt they'd simply "remove" it. As a start, aim assist shouldn't be allowed in competitive (PC) matches if anything. They could also progressively reduce its effects as a player advances in skill or time played or what have you. Let me play you the song of my people!
Evolution-7 The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 202	Posted - 2013.11.21 16:15:00 - [28] - Quote Funkmaster Whale wrote: I'm wondering what people would think about toning back the aim assist back to what it was before (before magnetism and adhesion) and simply keep aim friction. People have been complaining about low TTK since 1.6 hit. Before, gunfights were increasingly difficult because lack of aim assist and crap hit detection made kills take longer. Now, with most bullets registering AND having our reticles stick to targets makes it a "who shot first" sort of twitch shooter. The skill in aiming was taken away because hit detection was not yet up to par. Now with hit detection actually working as intended, do you think it's time we take a look at aim assist again? This was a huge topic of discussion when it first hit and I still think it's the most pervading issue in regards to the low TTK. Hit detection is not great, my thales still gets the blue splash effect when you hit someone and the shields flash yet they still do not take a scratch of damage. Veteran Pilot "Fight on and fly on to the last drop of blood and the last drop of fuel, to the last beat of the heart."
Vell0cet Company of Marcher Lords Amarr Empire 581	Posted - 2013.11.21 16:25:00 - [29] - Quote AA isn't the problem. The problem is that the weapons have been balanced around sh*tty hit detection, which has mostly been fixed. They need to nerf damage on a few weapons that are OP right now (probably the upcoming rifles too) and add a slight bit of kick to the AR (significantly less than the AScR). Quick/Dirty Test Range Idea
CLONE117 planetary retaliation organisation 482	Posted - 2013.11.21 16:28:00 - [30] - Quote how many stupid ppl are going to think stupid things on these forums? first of all aim assist is not auto aim. that is the biased view that says its auto aim. im still having those moments in gameplay where i get shot from behind and manage to turn around or find some cover and react to save myself from dieing. im still getting those moments where im surviving even after ive been surrounded by enemies. most ppl seem to want to make themselves close to invincible so they can have hours to react to a certain scenario. that was how it used to be for proto vs mlt. still is. its just not as great a gap anymore. how else can zurg rush tactics be so effective?. its because an entire team in full proto could just rush into a place guns blazing and capture the objective with ease. although now its pretty much turned into a siege. a type of trench warfare of sorts. but clever tactics and thinking can hold a position under constant attack for some time before being overwhelmed now. i might not be able to survive running into a wall of gunfire now or survive out of cover for long but im still doing good with my mlt gear. this game isnt even near cod currently. if it was. i would most certainly never get any good kdrs in any of my matches. because my cover using playstyle that i use so much is pretty much useless in cod or bf. yet its very effective in dust 514 for some reason. hmm i wonder what that means?.. other than all of this my gameplay style hasnt changed much through all the nerfs and buffs. ive had to use new strategies and tactics but that about it. the only thing that changed my playstyle massively was when my beloved free starter fit lav was removed due to complaining proto bears who kept getting pancaked while standing in the middle of the road. ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 100% chance of trolls is to be expected

Meeko Fent Commando Perkone Caldari State 1633	Posted - 2013.11.21 16:39:00 - [31] - Quote medomai grey wrote: Meeko Fent wrote: medomai grey wrote: We don't have aim friction, only aim adhesion. Also toning down aim assist won't really address the short TTK. coughBothcough "Autoaim" doesn't Lock on target Only works when aiming DIRECTLY at target Go and play COD or BF, and you WILL notice how the game basically clicks your gun directly on the enemy, with out any help from you. DUST doesn't do that COD and BF have the Aim slow down when just on target in general. DUST doesn't do that. SOURCE Conclusion- DUST has one of the softest Aim Assist out there. We have aim-assist, not auto-aim. There's a bid difference between the 2. I never state that AA(aim-assist) locks on to targets. AA actually only kicks in when you directly aim at a target; I have no idea why you claim it doesn't. Once you lock on to a target, the aiming reticle will follow the target to a very limited degree. The aiming reticle doesn't slow down over targets so much as it lightly sticks to them. Thus we don't have aim friction, only aim adhesion. Either your English sucks and you aren't correctly conveying your thoughts or your the kind of knuckle head that argues with someone you mostly agree with. Thats what I said. For the State! For Caldari FW join Caldari Hierarchy Replication Warrior
Komodo Jones Chaotik Serenity 202	Posted - 2013.11.21 16:44:00 - [32] - Quote Aim assist was put in to counteract the power you get from using mouse and keyboard, if aim assist is being removed then they need to work on controller sensitivity (allow very fine movements while making quicker turns possible) or just remove mouse and keyboard support. Otherwise I'm all for it.
Meeko Fent Commando Perkone Caldari State 1633	Posted - 2013.11.21 16:46:00 - [33] - Quote Vell0cet wrote: AA isn't the problem. The problem is that the weapons have been balanced around shtty hit detection, which has mostly been fixed. They need to nerf damage on a few weapons that are OP right now (probably the upcoming rifles too) and add a slight bit of kick to the AR (significantly less than the AScR). EXACTLY. For the State! For Caldari FW join Caldari Hierarchy* Replication Warrior
Funkmaster Whale Fatal Absolution 1173	Posted - 2013.11.21 16:46:00 - [34] - Quote Komodo Jones wrote: Aim assist was put in to counteract the power you get from using mouse and keyboard, if aim assist is being removed then they need to work on controller sensitivity (allow very fine movements while making quicker turns possible) or just remove mouse and keyboard support. Otherwise I'm all for it. Or they could keep aim assist and give mouse/keyboard raw input. Mouse/keyboard is hardly as great as people think it is. There's pretty severe input lag as well as very awkward sensitivity controls which makes close-quarter combat an absolute nightmare vs any DS3 aim assist user. Let me play you the song of my people!
CLONE117 planetary retaliation organisation 487	Posted - 2013.11.21 19:43:00 - [35] - Quote well it looks like mouse/keyboard do great at sniping.
KA24DERT Pure Innocence. EoN. 259	Posted - 2013.11.21 21:29:00 - [36] - Quote CLONE117 wrote: well it looks like mouse/keyboard do great at sniping. Nope. The current mouse implementation has a habit of ignoring fine input. Getting a headshot on even a still target takes a few sweeps across their model to get the crosshairs to land just right. Even back in Chromosome (when the mouse had a turn speed cap, but arguably better precision) the top players were still DS3 users without the benefit of aim assist. I don't think aim assist really factors into the mouse vs ds3 argument. It's just a crutch that has become "tradition" on consoles, and I don't think it has a place in a seriously competitive game like this, especially with the amount of damage the rifles are doing.
Meeko Fent Commando Perkone Caldari State 1636	Posted - 2013.11.21 22:14:00 - [37] - Quote KA24DERT wrote: CLONE117 wrote: well it looks like mouse/keyboard do great at sniping. Nope. The current mouse implementation has a habit of ignoring fine input. Getting a headshot on even a still target takes a few sweeps across their model to get the crosshairs to land just right. Even back in Chromosome (when the mouse had a turn speed cap, but arguably better precision) the top players were still DS3 users without the benefit of aim assist. I don't think aim assist really factors into the mouse vs ds3 argument. It's just a crutch that has become "tradition" on consoles, and I don't think it has a place in a seriously competitive game like this, especially with the amount of damage the rifles are doing. Its a game. No video game should be "seriously competitive" This isn't football. Its a game people play to relax after a day of work to chill. For the State! For Caldari FW join Caldari Hierarchy Replication Warrior
KA24DERT Pure Innocence. EoN. 259	Posted - 2013.11.21 22:53:00 - [38] - Quote Meeko Fent wrote: KA24DERT wrote: CLONE117 wrote: well it looks like mouse/keyboard do great at sniping. Nope. The current mouse implementation has a habit of ignoring fine input. Getting a headshot on even a still target takes a few sweeps across their model to get the crosshairs to land just right. Even back in Chromosome (when the mouse had a turn speed cap, but arguably better precision) the top players were still DS3 users without the benefit of aim assist. I don't think aim assist really factors into the mouse vs ds3 argument. It's just a crutch that has become "tradition" on consoles, and I don't think it has a place in a seriously competitive game like this, especially with the amount of damage the rifles are doing. Its a game. No video game should be "seriously competitive" This isn't football. Its a game people play to relax after a day of work to chill. Get thee to Farmville and don't come back.
Meeko Fent Commando Perkone Caldari State 1640	Posted - 2013.11.21 23:02:00 - [39] - Quote KA24DERT wrote: Meeko Fent wrote: KA24DERT wrote: CLONE117 wrote: well it looks like mouse/keyboard do great at sniping. Nope. The current mouse implementation has a habit of ignoring fine input. Getting a headshot on even a still target takes a few sweeps across their model to get the crosshairs to land just right. Even back in Chromosome (when the mouse had a turn speed cap, but arguably better precision) the top players were still DS3 users without the benefit of aim assist. I don't think aim assist really factors into the mouse vs ds3 argument. It's just a crutch that has become "tradition" on consoles, and I don't think it has a place in a seriously competitive game like this, especially with the amount of damage the rifles are doing. Its a game. No video game should be "seriously competitive" This isn't football. Its a game people play to relax after a day of work to chill. Get thee to Farmville and don't come back. Why do you play a video game? Because all you want to do is play it and win every match/ A game is to be fun, and casual, even the more hardcore games are casual compared to actual competitive games. For the State! For Caldari FW join Caldari Hierarchy Replication Warrior
KA24DERT Pure Innocence. EoN. 259	Posted - 2013.11.21 23:33:00 - [40] - Quote Meeko Fent wrote: KA24DERT wrote: Meeko Fent wrote: Its a game. No video game should be "seriously competitive" This isn't football. Its a game people play to relax after a day of work to chill. Get thee to Farmville and don't come back. Why do you play a video game? Because all you want to do is play it and win every match/ A game is to be fun, and casual, even the more hardcore games are casual compared to actual competitive games. Yes, I play video games because I like competition, and I like to try hard, and I like to earn victories through effort. Why do you play video games? To sit around on the couch, put in the bare minimum effort, and to still be rewarded? There are many video games that can fill that need, and this is not one of them. I think this right here is an example of the vast gulf between between the current inhabitants of New Eden, and the types of people CCP is apparently trying to reach out to. If CCP keeps trying to appeal to people who want to click a cow, theyGÇÖre going to destroy one of the most unique universes in gaming history for the benefit of the lowest common denominator. Keep New Eden hard, disable aim assist and aim your damned selves!

Quil Evrything DUST University Ivy League 414	Posted - 2013.11.21 23:41:00 - [41] - Quote KA24DERT wrote: Agree. Removing aim assist from the game is the first step in balancing the rifles. Aim assist has nothing to do with the reason behind the fact I die in 0.2 seconds from a duvolle.
KA24DERT Pure Innocence. EoN. 259	Posted - 2013.11.22 00:47:00 - [42] - Quote Quil Evrything wrote: KA24DERT wrote: Agree. Removing aim assist from the game is the first step in balancing the rifles. Aim assist has nothing to do with the reason behind the fact I die in 0.2 seconds from a duvolle. Nope, nothing to do with it. Nothing at all.
Funkmaster Whale Fatal Absolution 1192	Posted - 2013.11.22 01:37:00 - [43] - Quote Quil Evrything wrote: KA24DERT wrote: Agree. Removing aim assist from the game is the first step in balancing the rifles. Aim assist has nothing to do with the reason behind the fact I die in 0.2 seconds from a duvolle. That's a pretty odd statement. Aim assist allows better tracking of targets which mathematically translates into more net damage Statistically, this means there's a higher percentage of bullets being landed over unit time which is why you die so much faster than before. Isn't it sort of a coincidence that the whole TTK arguments came about as soon as we got AA back and hit detection was improved? That's beside the point. I'm here asking for CCP to give us simple 1:1 raw input regarding mouse controls so that we can level the playing field. As if stands, DS3 users have far better CQC aiming that mouse users because (a) low framerate inherently inhibits your responsiveness to target movement thus increasing delay between tracking, and (b) very strange mouse control (read: not raw input) significantly reduces precision in regards player input. All I really seek to know is why whatever mouse scheme they created for this game cannot be converted to or at least given the option for raw input. Let me play you the song of my people!
FAKIR REDETTa Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 7	Posted - 2013.11.22 02:06:00 - [44] - Quote Funkmaster Whale wrote: Quil Evrything wrote: KA24DERT wrote: Agree. Removing aim assist from the game is the first step in balancing the rifles. Aim assist has nothing to do with the reason behind the fact I die in 0.2 seconds from a duvolle. That's a pretty odd statement. Aim assist allows better tracking of targets which mathematically translates into more net damage Statistically, this means there's a higher percentage of bullets being landed over unit time which is why you die so much faster than before. Isn't it sort of a coincidence that the whole TTK arguments came about as soon as we got AA back and hit detection was improved? That's beside the point. I'm here asking for CCP to give us simple 1:1 raw input regarding mouse controls so that we can level the playing field. As if stands, DS3 users have far better CQC aiming that mouse users because (a) low framerate inherently inhibits your responsiveness to target movement thus increasing delay between tracking, and (b) very strange mouse control (read: not raw input) significantly reduces precision in regards player input. All I really seek to know is why whatever mouse scheme they created for this game cannot be converted to or at least given the option for raw input. fuk u whale u use modded aim reticle for ur fg u ******
CLONE117 planetary retaliation organisation 494	Posted - 2013.12.03 16:04:00 - [45] - Quote KA24DERT wrote: Meeko Fent wrote: KA24DERT wrote: Meeko Fent wrote: Its a game. No video game should be "seriously competitive" This isn't football. Its a game people play to relax after a day of work to chill. Get thee to Farmville and don't come back. Why do you play a video game? Because all you want to do is play it and win every match/ A game is to be fun, and casual, even the more hardcore games are casual compared to actual competitive games. Yes, I play video games because I like competition, and I like to try hard, and I like to earn victories through effort. Why do you play video games? To sit around on the couch, put in the bare minimum effort, and to still be rewarded? There are many video games that can fill that need, and this is not one of them. I think this right here is an example of the vast gulf between between the current inhabitants of New Eden, and the types of people CCP is apparently trying to reach out to. If CCP keeps trying to appeal to people who want to click a cow, theyGÇÖre going to destroy one of the most unique universes in gaming history for the benefit of the lowest common denominator. Keep New Eden hard, disable aim assist and aim your damned selves! ok so i see one side that wants things easy. and another side that wants to be competitive. well heres a perfect solution to that problem. stop running your stupid proto suits pubstomping everything and maybe the game will become more challenging for u. other than that. if we get a better search parameter system in the form of a customizable gear restriction type thing. there could be a proto only mode for the "competitive players" and then there could be a mlt only mode for the ppl who want easy mode. lets see what gets used more after that. my guess is that the mlt side might be used more as the "try hards" who say they want "challenge" would jump into this mode only to have an easy time and pad their own kd/r. lets just ruin the game and give every1 full proto of every type of item in game and see how it goes from there. and infinite amounts of cpu and pg to fit on their suits and vehicles.


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.