Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Laurent Cazaderon
What The French
2026
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 15:18:00 -
[31] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:I just feel that I kill stuff too fast with Toxin AR and ScR. Maybe that is good for me, but it is not good for the game, since it it is supposed to be a shooter with High Hp, strafing and tracking skills.
I wont say otherwise. the 10% uprising buff needs to go for rifles\smgs as a first step. might end up being a good balance move across the board regarding rifles\other weapons dynamic.
Would love to have more feedback regarding taking this to the devs as a possible first step hotfix.
This Char i only use on the forum.
To contact me : "Cazaderon" in game and on Skype.
Et vive la France !
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
357
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 15:21:00 -
[32] - Quote
Laurent Cazaderon wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:I just feel that I kill stuff too fast with Toxin AR and ScR. Maybe that is good for me, but it is not good for the game, since it it is supposed to be a shooter with High Hp, strafing and tracking skills. I wont say otherwise. the 10% uprising buff needs to go for rifles\smgs as a first step. might end up being a good balance move across the board regarding rifles\other weapons dynamic. Would love to have more feedback regarding taking this to the devs as a possible first step hotfix.
Please make a name list or something. I will sign it immidiately for you. I bet most dust players will also do it.
+¦-damage specialist since Sep ´13.
CCP please make our decisions matter.
"AR 514. Core Locus 514. Bricktank 514."
|
Laurent Cazaderon
What The French
2029
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 15:29:00 -
[33] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Laurent Cazaderon wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:I just feel that I kill stuff too fast with Toxin AR and ScR. Maybe that is good for me, but it is not good for the game, since it it is supposed to be a shooter with High Hp, strafing and tracking skills. I wont say otherwise. the 10% uprising buff needs to go for rifles\smgs as a first step. might end up being a good balance move across the board regarding rifles\other weapons dynamic. Would love to have more feedback regarding taking this to the devs as a possible first step hotfix. Please make a name list or something. I will sign it immidiately for you. I bet most dust players will also do it.
No need, i lurk around enough ^^
Also, i already mentionned to Wolf many players were "surprised" by the lower TTK. Said i would keep lurking and discussing it. Wolf said they didnt get that feeling in internal play test so he is gonna play online himself to forge its own opinion.
And he'll probably lurk down here as well
This Char i only use on the forum.
To contact me : "Cazaderon" in game and on Skype.
Et vive la France !
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
7450
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 15:30:00 -
[34] - Quote
Laurent Cazaderon wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Laurent Cazaderon wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:I just feel that I kill stuff too fast with Toxin AR and ScR. Maybe that is good for me, but it is not good for the game, since it it is supposed to be a shooter with High Hp, strafing and tracking skills. I wont say otherwise. the 10% uprising buff needs to go for rifles\smgs as a first step. might end up being a good balance move across the board regarding rifles\other weapons dynamic. Would love to have more feedback regarding taking this to the devs as a possible first step hotfix. Please make a name list or something. I will sign it immidiately for you. I bet most dust players will also do it. No need, i lurk around enough ^^ Also, i already mentionned to Wolf many players were "surprised" by the lower TTK. Said i would keep lurking and discussing it. Wolf said they didnt get that feeling in internal play test so he is gonna play online himself to forge its own opinion. And he'll probably lurk down here as well Of course they didn't get that impression in internal testing when half their shots are missing because of bad aim
|
Laurent Cazaderon
What The French
2033
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 15:39:00 -
[35] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Of course they didn't get that impression in internal testing when half their shots are missing because of bad aim
THAT is exactly what i said to him .
This Char i only use on the forum.
To contact me : "Cazaderon" in game and on Skype.
Et vive la France !
|
Beren Hurin
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
1766
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 15:40:00 -
[36] - Quote
Could we get a little more technical?:
If we were to decide a 'paper' baseline HP:DPS (TTK) ratio at the STD skill/suit level what would you guys decide it should be? That's what we are talking about right? Also, what do you guys think the data has suits scaling up to on paper. If you can fit 2x the tank on a PRO suit while also doing 50% more DPS and everyone else can do that that means TTK goes up by 1/3rd (against like PRO fits), against the STD fits it drops by about 1/3rd.
The big disparity is that the STD loadout shooting the PRO loadout means that STD TTK vs. the PRO is 2x as long as STD TTK vs. another STD and 3x longer than it takes for the PRO to kill the STD. This means that in order to overcome his stat disadvantage, the STD fit player has to be 3x as efficient in hitting his target, using shield recharges, dodging rounds, utilizing reloads, etc. as the PRO fit players.
With those kinds of multipliers, you can see that as you make a STD vs. STD base TTK much more than 2 seconds, at least with the model's rate of scaling (more HP/damage for PRO suits) you really start to reward the kind of 'handicap allowance' that PRO suits/weapons give you.
For balance two core design questions would be:
1) What is a good STD vs. STD TTK. 2) How do you best scale the advantages of skill to reward SP investment, but not cripple the usefulness of STD gear? IOW, what should STD vs. STD/ PRO vs. PRO/ and STD vs PRO / PRO vs. STD TTK all be? 3) Should we be balancing TTK for 1v1 or for other combat models? |
Vell0cet
Company of Marcher Lords Amarr Empire
514
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 15:40:00 -
[37] - Quote
Laurent Cazaderon wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:I just feel that I kill stuff too fast with Toxin AR and ScR. Maybe that is good for me, but it is not good for the game, since it it is supposed to be a shooter with High Hp, strafing and tracking skills. I wont say otherwise. the 10% uprising buff needs to go for rifles\smgs as a first step imo. might end up being a good balance move across the board regarding rifles\other weapons dynamic. Would love to have more feedback regarding taking this to the devs as a possible first step hotfix. +1.
I agree completely with everything you've stated in this thread. I'm happy HD has been fixed, and you're absolutely right about the necessary balance changes to compensate. This needs to happen ASAP (hotfix). This is the worst DUST has felt since 1.3. I'm running cheap suits only right now because the expensive stuff is not worth running in 1.6.
Quick/Dirty Test Range Idea
|
Laurent Cazaderon
What The French
2033
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 15:46:00 -
[38] - Quote
Beren Hurin wrote:Could we get a little more technical?:
If we were to decide a 'paper' baseline HP:DPS (TTK) ratio at the STD skill/suit level what would you guys decide it should be? That's what we are talking about right? Also, what do you guys think the data has suits scaling up to on paper. If you can fit 2x the tank on a PRO suit while also doing 50% more DPS and everyone else can do that that means TTK goes up by 1/3rd (against like PRO fits), against the STD fits it drops by about 1/3rd.
The big disparity is that the STD loadout shooting the PRO loadout means that STD TTK vs. the PRO is 2x as long as STD TTK vs. another STD and 3x longer than it takes for the PRO to kill the STD. This means that in order to overcome his stat disadvantage, the STD fit player has to be 3x as efficient in hitting his target, using shield recharges, dodging rounds, utilizing reloads, etc. as the PRO fit players.
With those kinds of multipliers, you can see that as you make a STD vs. STD base TTK much more than 2 seconds, at least with the model's rate of scaling (more HP/damage for PRO suits) you really start to reward the kind of 'handicap allowance' that PRO suits/weapons give you.
For balance two core design questions would be:
1) What is a good STD vs. STD TTK. 2) How do you best scale the advantages of skill to reward SP investment, but not cripple the usefulness of STD gear? IOW, what should STD vs. STD/ PRO vs. PRO/ and STD vs PRO / PRO vs. STD TTK all be? 3) Should we be balancing TTK for 1v1 or for other combat models?
You lost me there pal That would deserve an entirely different topic to discuss it
This Char i only use on the forum.
To contact me : "Cazaderon" in game and on Skype.
Et vive la France !
|
Thumb Green
Novashift
502
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 15:46:00 -
[39] - Quote
PEW JACKSON wrote: Considering it has a 40m optimal and an effective range out to 120m.
It's effective range is 65 meters. Anyone that dies to the AR passed that range was already low health and stayed out in the open too long or are being shot at by multiple people.
PEW JACKSON wrote: Btw I've seen the new weaps that are coming. Chances are AR scrubs that die to them will cry NERF!!! Then after a few CCP hammer swings, we'll be playing AR 514 again. If anyone's left.
But the new weapons are AR's and the the people crying to nerf them will be the same people crying to nerf the current AR.
The problem with the AR as well as every other weapon is that they are all balanced around short range combat. With exception to the forge gun and sniper rifle there is no medium range and there is most certainly no such thing as long range not even with the sniper rifle; the damn thing can't even shoot beyond 500 meters and it's a freaking rail gun for christ's sake.
Never mind the president, let's overgrow the government.
|
Shotty GoBang
Pro Hic Immortalis
2084
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 15:47:00 -
[40] - Quote
M McManus wrote: From what I've read the only one that plays anymore is Kain and he's pretty awful as a heavy. So maybe the heavy will get more love...
Nova Knife is playing again.
|
|
Krom Ganesh
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
580
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 15:51:00 -
[41] - Quote
Beren Hurin wrote:Could we get a little more technical?:
If we were to decide a 'paper' baseline HP:DPS (TTK) ratio at the STD skill/suit level what would you guys decide it should be? That's what we are talking about right? Also, what do you guys think the data has suits scaling up to on paper. If you can fit 2x the tank on a PRO suit while also doing 50% more DPS and everyone else can do that that means TTK goes up by 1/3rd (against like PRO fits), against the STD fits it drops by about 1/3rd.
The big disparity is that the STD loadout shooting the PRO loadout means that STD TTK vs. the PRO is 2x as long as STD TTK vs. another STD and 3x longer than it takes for the PRO to kill the STD. This means that in order to overcome his stat disadvantage, the STD fit player has to be 3x as efficient in hitting his target, using shield recharges, dodging rounds, utilizing reloads, etc. as the PRO fit players.
With those kinds of multipliers, you can see that as you make a STD vs. STD base TTK much more than 2 seconds, at least with the model's rate of scaling (more HP/damage for PRO suits) you really start to reward the kind of 'handicap allowance' that PRO suits/weapons give you.
For balance two core design questions would be:
1) What is a good STD vs. STD TTK. 2) How do you best scale the advantages of skill to reward SP investment, but not cripple the usefulness of STD gear? IOW, what should STD vs. STD/ PRO vs. PRO/ and STD vs PRO / PRO vs. STD TTK all be? 3) Should we be balancing TTK for 1v1 or for other combat models?
Or we could this. And then just need to decide TTK for a single tier. |
Cat Merc
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
4139
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 15:55:00 -
[42] - Quote
In other news if CPM doesn't push your agenda, they're doing nothing.
Oculus Felis Semper Vigilant
Beta Vet
Level 4 Forum Warrior
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
357
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 15:58:00 -
[43] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:In other news if CPM doesn't push your agenda, they're doing nothing.
That is the job of the CPM, to push player's complaints and worries to ccp.
+¦-damage specialist since Sep ´13.
CCP please make our decisions matter.
"AR 514. Core Locus 514. Bricktank 514."
|
Flix Keptick
Red Star. EoN.
1236
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 16:01:00 -
[44] - Quote
Beren Hurin wrote:PEW JACKSON wrote:Beren Hurin wrote:What exactly is your issue with the AR? Have you seen the new weapons that are coming out? Are you dying too much from a close range high RoF high damage weapon? Are you staying inside its optimals where it is SUPPOSED to chew you to shreds? Considering it has a 40m optimal and an effective range out to 120m.... What do you suppose we all do? It chews through armor just as well, if not better than SMGs in their optimals. It can melt LR users faster in their own optimals with no overheat. Hmg is a huge airsoft gun compared to the AR. Ascr loses in dps due to it's dispersion(WTF???) Scr Rifles meh, there are exceptions, but they're not in a great place. Same with scram pistols Mass Driver users will be dead before the 2nd shot gets fired against an AR. Shotgun users get face raped if they miss more than 2 shots against the all mighty AR. Don't believe it? Find the nearest proto suited dmg modded AR scrub and see how you die. Btw I've seen the new weaps that are coming. Chances are AR scrubs that die to them will cry NERF!!! Then after a few CCP hammer swings, we'll be playing AR 514 again. If anyone's left. If there is an issue I have with the AR itself, yes it is dispersion. But frankly, as a player who has figured out how to pick engagement easily outside of the 50m circle on my map with weapons that can outperform against the AR I have little sympathy for your DPS arguments. If you tone down the DPS on the AR much more than 5-10%, then just outside their falloff EVERY OTHER rifle become completely dominant over them. Inside their optimals they are king. Changing it to have slightly more dispersion would be enough to mechanically alter DPS. At about 50% of their falloff they have pretty good sustained damage compared to other weapons. However, any AR but a duvolle/TAC with damage mods cannot compete with the lasers at its 70m optimals. The only other situation where your argument is more valid than not is in PC where lag favors high damage, close proximity, and reliably high RoF weapons. That is NOT A STAT ISSUE, that is a hardware/performance issue. That's the point, ever heard of diversity? An ar SHOULD be beaten by other weapons at longer ranges (if those weapons are designed for longer ranges).
"Please don't"
GÿåForum warrior lvl.1Gÿå
|
Beren Hurin
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
1766
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 16:08:00 -
[45] - Quote
Laurent Cazaderon wrote:You lost me there pal That would deserve an entirely different topic to discuss it
BAH! Where did I lose you? My point is that this is a TTK thread. What SHOULD be a good TTK for these different suit vs. suit combinations? If you take your militia AR and are looking at a militia starter suit standing still like a dolt, how long should it take to kill him with 100% accuracy?
Whatever this number is, it would then have to take into account, more or less the reality of combat. To what extent could he move to mitigate your accuracy? To what extent would YOUR moving reduce your own accuracy? To what extent could/should latency reduce weapon effectiveness?
Let's say you pick 1.5 seconds as the baseline for MLT AR killing MLT suit with 100% accuracy. If HIS movement reduces your accuracy by 25% and your own movement reduces it by 25% then this stacks as making you 56% of original effectiveness. This then makes TTK in this scenario 2.7 seconds. Now give him a PRO suit with 2x more HP, and your TTK doubles to >5 seconds, w/o modifying for him possibly being faster or getting in a shield recharge or having enough of a window to be getting logi reps.
Now you then have to keep in mind that different weapons reward accuracy different along with applying the range and 'speed' and of your dps (burst or sustained) differently.
So can we go there? How long should it take to kill a normal strafing MLT suit with a MLT rifle for a person with average accuracy? |
Cat Merc
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
4139
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 16:44:00 -
[46] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Cat Merc wrote:In other news if CPM doesn't push your agenda, they're doing nothing. That is the job of the CPM, to push player's complaints and worries to ccp. But it's YOUR agenda. I could want to nerf scouts, and since the CPM won't make CCP do it, then they're doing nothing?
Oculus Felis Semper Vigilant
Beta Vet
Level 4 Forum Warrior
|
Heinrich Jagerblitzen
D3LTA FORC3
1013
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 17:44:00 -
[47] - Quote
M McManus wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Jenza, IWS, Kain, etc, see title. From what I've read the only one that plays anymore is Kain and he's pretty awful as a heavy. So maybe the heavy will get more love...
Let's see.....2000-3000 PCU average, 6 individual CPM members. The chances of running into one of us are extremely slim, and that probability drops to zero if you don't run pubs, or aren't one of the PC corps we belong to or ring for. That probability also increases to 100% if you simply send us a mail with a time and chat channel where we can find you to squad up.
Caz and Jenza are the only two CPM members to go completely inactive for a stretch in the summer, but due to RL responsibilities and a lack of being given anything to work on by CCP. In other words - the only people believing this "CPM doesnt play Dust" bullshit are those incapable of doing basic math, the idiots that will believe anything posted on the internet BY those that are incapable of doing basic math, or those too lazy or stubborn to actually invite us to a squad sometime. I hope no one in this thread falls into these categories.
I play every single day, give me a poke and I'll happily squad up and you can see for yourself.
Quote:BAH! Where did I lose you? My point is that this is a TTK thread. What SHOULD be a good TTK for these different suit vs. suit combinations? If you take your militia AR and are looking at a militia starter suit standing still like a dolt, how long should it take to kill him with 100% accuracy?
TTK is totally relative - I'm fine with it being extremely low if you're using your weapon properly at the right range. I see nothing wrong with rapid takedowns of shield tanked suits with scrambler rifles at 80m, or quick blaps at point blank with the shotgun, or second and a half deaths at 30 m with an AR on a stationary target. This should be a tactical game, where positioning, flanking, and weapon usage matter more than individual twitch skill.
Quote: Now give him a PRO suit with 2x more HP, and your TTK doubles to >5 seconds, w/o modifying for him possibly being faster or getting in a shield recharge or having enough of a window to be getting logi reps.
THIS is where we get to the crux of the problem. As far as what I'm pushing for as a CPM member - I'd much rather have CCP rebalance suits and weapons to eliminate this major design problem of higher tiers = more raw power (or as many of you like to call it, "Tiericide.") It took years for CCP to weed this problem out of EVE Online - only to inject it right back into Dust. Instead of obsessing over the minutia of TTK figures, I'd rather the communite unite and collectively push CCP to redesign suits and weapons so that higher tiers enable specialization, not an easier beatdown.
Alternative, if CCP is too stubborn to go to this much work, at very least I think its time we seriously considered banning proto (and possibly advanced) gear from public contract matches, especially now that we'll have two "hardcore" game modes with FW and PC giving players plenty of competitive places to use their best gear. This would give younger players an easier foothold into the game and grow the community much faster than it does today. |
Beren Hurin
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
1766
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 18:05:00 -
[48] - Quote
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote:Quote: Now give him a PRO suit with 2x more HP, and your TTK doubles to >5 seconds, w/o modifying for him possibly being faster or getting in a shield recharge or having enough of a window to be getting logi reps.
THIS is where we get to the crux of the problem. As far as what I'm pushing for as a CPM member - I'd much rather have CCP rebalance suits and weapons to eliminate this major design problem of higher tiers = more raw power (or as many of you like to call it, "Tiericide.") It took years for CCP to weed this problem out of EVE Online - only to inject it right back into Dust. Instead of obsessing over the minutia of TTK figures, I'd rather the communite unite and collectively push CCP to redesign suits and weapons so that higher tiers enable specialization, not an easier beatdown. Alternative, if CCP is too stubborn to go to this much work, at very least I think its time we seriously considered banning proto (and possibly advanced) gear from public contract matches, especially now that we'll have two "hardcore" game modes with FW and PC giving players plenty of competitive places to use their best gear. This would give younger players an easier foothold into the game and grow the community much faster than it does today.
Huah! finally, someone wants to actually talk about the problem constructively! So if trying to design around a reasonable baseline TTK is not what we want to do, and you are proposing 'specialization' as the alternative to overpowered upgrading, then we have to describe concretely what is acceptable specialization.
If we DON'T mean 'categorically superiorior TTK' across all categories then specialization has to be well defined as something other than superior TTK. Also, if 'specialization' is the end-state of our hypothetical design, then are we saying that players should more or less be penalized for generalizing, and/or for not choosing the right specialization for whatever context they are in? If so, how badly should they be penalized for how poorly they choose? How much SP should be dedicated to effective specializations?
We should recognize that these are the very complicated kinds of design questions that get really nuanced, difficult to integrate into the many game systems that exist, plan out, and bring to fruition as CCP is unfolding this thing. They can put feelers out there for CPM input, and have ideas in mind for end-states, but a lot of the answers to the above questions don't have a lot of objective answers.
Short sighted rage posts along the lines of "TTK IS TOO SHORT" or "THIS IS AN EFFING TRACKING SHOOTER! WTF!" doesn't really give credit to the difficulty inherent in designing a solution to these questions. |
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
364
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 19:37:00 -
[49] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Cat Merc wrote:In other news if CPM doesn't push your agenda, they're doing nothing. That is the job of the CPM, to push player's complaints and worries to ccp. But it's YOUR agenda. I could want to nerf scouts, and since the CPM won't make CCP do it, then they're doing nothing?
When I talk about AR I mean AR and ScR right now, possibly RR and CR.
+¦-damage specialist since Sep ´13.
CCP please make our decisions matter.
"AR 514. Core Locus 514. Bricktank 514."
|
Laurent Cazaderon
What The French
2052
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 00:17:00 -
[50] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Cat Merc wrote:In other news if CPM doesn't push your agenda, they're doing nothing. That is the job of the CPM, to push player's complaints and worries to ccp. But it's YOUR agenda. I could want to nerf scouts, and since the CPM won't make CCP do it, then they're doing nothing?
Except we dont push stuff coming from a single individual. the whole point is to try and mix our own experience with community feedback and dev talks.
This Char i only use on the forum.
To contact me : "Cazaderon" in game and on Skype.
Et vive la France !
|
|
Delta 749
Kestrel Reconnaissance
2311
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 00:20:00 -
[51] - Quote
Mortedeamor wrote:M McManus wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Jenza, IWS, Kain, etc, see title. From what I've read the only one that plays anymore is Kain and he's pretty awful as a heavy. So maybe the heavy will get more love... hey plays last i saw him ina min logi witha proto smg
I saw him last week in a medium Amarr suit with an AR, poor guy went 5-8
Im not drunk, the planet just happens to be especially wobbly today.
|
Nova Knife
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
2093
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 00:34:00 -
[52] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote: (Stuff about AR's and the CPM)
Personally, my biggest gripe with the AR is the kick being bugged (or at very least, poorly implemented) and wolfman refusing to acknowledge it. What I mean by this is : Kick is exponential based on time firing, not based per bullet. IE: A bullet fired at the beggining of the clip will have significantly less kick than one fired after a few seconds of steady fring. This means that anyone who is smart enough to know that you should always be burst firing, is almost completely unaffected by any kick worth mentioning. Whereas anyone who just holds the trigger and goes full auto, sees a massive amount of kick in the last 15 rounds or so of their clip.
It makes no sense, and defintely contributes to the "AR EZ MODE" impressions people get. That is the one change I'd personally make to ARs before even touching the damage or range.
I'm also in the camp that the TTK has gone a little fubar and could use some looking at.
But, in regards to your actual question : The CPM is pretty much doing nothing about AR's. We've flat out told CCP on NUMEROUS occasions to take balance feedback from the main forums FIRST and then come to us if they need a filter for all the badposting. Balance isn't our job as a collective council, and aside from us raising red flags and saying "OH GOD THIS IS GOING TO BE HORRIBLE" we've tried as best as we can to keep our collective noses out of it, and to tell them to make devposts asking for feedback on whatever.
Spectral Clone wrote: When I talk about AR I mean AR and ScR right now, possibly RR and CR.
Though, if you want to talk about problems... Just wait until the CR hits. (Remember when the breach SMG was king? Yeah, it's gonna be that all over again, but with more range) For all intents and purposes the CR is pretty much an SMG with more accuracy and range.
Rail rifle is going to be entirely underwhelming or hilariously good.
However, aside from telling CCP when they first told us the stats "Yeah, CR is going to be OP as hell", they haven't been told from our end how to adjust them. Like said above. We urged them to post the stats and get peoples' thoughts from the general public.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |