Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Chances Ghost
D3M3NT3D M1NDZ The Umbra Combine
952
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 10:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
the answer is stability and reliability
Beucase of how long it takes to fully skill into a weapon and how oftin weapons go back and fourth in usefullness the AR has been the safe weapon to pick and run since the game began.
almost everyone has skilled into the AR.
investing SP at this point is a gamble, you never know if what your skilling into will still be viable by the time youve invested months to max it out.
and this results in people staying on the safe side of things sticking to the AR in order to have the security of knowing their playstyle will never have to change.
not only that but every player reguardless of race starts with the AR, so they naturally stick to it since its what they first get used to.
its not that the AR is OP its that its the only safe weapon to spec into, the one that wont change and will always be viable.
that combined with its jack of all trades nature is whats creating the AR prevalance we have now.
Stop the AR- VS - Specialist weapons war guys.
its just the natural result of how the game is presented to new players, and the result of the rapid changes the game keeps going under.
|
Piraten Hovnoret
No Tax Scrubs
79
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 11:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
So it's ok 2 nerf al the other guns/stuff but the AR?
This is just a pathetic try to justify that the AR with the AA as it is now is OP .
I have a suggestion wy don't we undo al the guns nerf that was done BEFORE AA came into play. |
Chances Ghost
D3M3NT3D M1NDZ The Umbra Combine
952
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 11:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:So it's ok 2 nerf al the other guns/stuff but the AR?
This is just a pathetic try to justify that the AR with the AA as it is now is OP .
I have a suggestion wy don't we undo al the guns nerf that was done BEFORE AA came into play.
you should probably read a post before you comment.
no buffing or nerfing was mentioned.
aim assaist is turned off... it doesnt exsist they took away its magnetism a few days ago.
i dont friggen use the AR dumbass, and this isnt a pro AR thread.
this is an explanation of people behavior, the source of the ARs popularity and even if it was nerfed... you would STILL see the AR as the most popular weapon becuase of these factors.
this thread has nothing to do with the strength of the AR as a weapon. |
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
186
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 11:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:So it's ok 2 nerf al the other guns/stuff but the AR?
This is just a pathetic try to justify that the AR with the AA as it is now is OP .
I have a suggestion wy don't we undo al the guns nerf that was done BEFORE AA came into play.
To be fair the AA is not only a buff for the GAR its a buff for all weapons that benefit from it. And besides commom believes the AR got nerf rounds as well two in chromosome (well one and a half ^^) and one (and a half) in uprising as well... |
Kasote Denzara
A Vulture
282
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 11:32:00 -
[5] - Quote
TL;DR = They work. |
Chances Ghost
D3M3NT3D M1NDZ The Umbra Combine
952
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 11:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote:TL;DR = They work.
and always will |
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
1481
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 11:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
Only few people was using the AR before the Aim-assist, just look back.. you won't see many AR QQing threads. Most of the QQing was about the MD, but curiously ... no one is QQing about the MD anymore ? You have to be blind or stupid to don't see that the AA is the real problem, or both. |
KalOfTheRathi
Black Phoenix Mercenaries
729
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 11:44:00 -
[8] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:TL;DR = They work. and always will yep, good thread.
If SP wasn't so expensive i would try Scrambler Rifles and Laser Rifles. But I cannot afford to skill into one more much less two. |
Chances Ghost
D3M3NT3D M1NDZ The Umbra Combine
954
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 11:49:00 -
[9] - Quote
Banning Hammer wrote:Only few people was using the AR before the Aim-assist, just look back.. you won't see many AR QQing threads. Most of the QQing was about the MD, but curiously ... no one is QQing about the MD anymore ? You have to be blind or stupid to don't see that the AA is the real problem, or both.
ive been here since closed beta and the reign of missle dropships.
AR QQ threads have exsisted since the begining.
AA is turned off right now... so dont even bring that up here.
and yes most people used the AR before aim assist |
Ion Crush
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
85
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 11:56:00 -
[10] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:So it's ok 2 nerf al the other guns/stuff but the AR?
This is just a pathetic try to justify that the AR with the AA as it is now is OP .
I have a suggestion wy don't we undo al the guns nerf that was done BEFORE AA came into play.
Give back the HMG of the old days pertty please! Zip! every ones dead. |
|
Monkey MAC
killer taxi company General Tso's Alliance
562
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 11:58:00 -
[11] - Quote
Banning Hammer wrote:Only few people was using the AR before the Aim-assist, just look back.. you won't see many AR QQing threads. Most of the QQing was about the MD, but curiously ... no one is QQing about the MD anymore ? You have to be blind or stupid to don't see that the AA is the real problem, or both.
Or you know it might be hit detection, since MD hit detection was fixed the same time flaylock was released, yet the ar struggled with hit detection all the way to .4
But humour me this, why did no one complain when hit detection for the ar was broke, was it prehaps the weapon was a closer semblance to balance back then? When yoj could peek round a corner with out getting 50 ar rounds in your face, you could actually run across 20m of terrain before being butchered?!
Im not saying the old ar was perfect, it prehaps could have done with a little more power BACK THEN however now its too powerful, and so is the scrambler (a little less so, but still too much), the sweetmspot exsists somewhere between the 30% dps from .3 and 90% dps of .4, I would say between 75-85% of its current power would be perfect.
But then you need to buff the shotgun, sniper up a little!! |
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
1481
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:Banning Hammer wrote:Only few people was using the AR before the Aim-assist, just look back.. you won't see many AR QQing threads. Most of the QQing was about the MD, but curiously ... no one is QQing about the MD anymore ? You have to be blind or stupid to don't see that the AA is the real problem, or both. Or you know it might be hit detection, since MD hit detection was fixed the same time flaylock was released, yet the ar struggled with hit detection all the way to .4 But humour me this, why did no one complain when hit detection for the ar was broke, was it prehaps the weapon was a closer semblance to balance back then? When yoj could peek round a corner with out getting 50 ar rounds in your face, you could actually run across 20m of terrain before being butchered?! Im not saying the old ar was perfect, it prehaps could have done with a little more power BACK THEN however now its too powerful, and so is the scrambler (a little less so, but still too much), the sweetmspot exsists somewhere between the 30% dps from .3 and 90% dps of .4, I would say between 75-85% of its current power would be perfect. But then you need to buff the shotgun, sniper up a little!!
The MD works perfectly fine.. the same as before 1.4, and the only improvement with the hit detection is the Aim-assist. |
Chances Ghost
D3M3NT3D M1NDZ The Umbra Combine
955
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:08:00 -
[13] - Quote
this isnt a balance discussion folks...
|
Monkey MAC
killer taxi company General Tso's Alliance
563
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:16:00 -
[14] - Quote
Banning Hammer wrote:Monkey MAC wrote:Banning Hammer wrote:Only few people was using the AR before the Aim-assist, just look back.. you won't see many AR QQing threads. Most of the QQing was about the MD, but curiously ... no one is QQing about the MD anymore ? You have to be blind or stupid to don't see that the AA is the real problem, or both. Or you know it might be hit detection, since MD hit detection was fixed the same time flaylock was released, yet the ar struggled with hit detection all the way to .4 But humour me this, why did no one complain when hit detection for the ar was broke, was it prehaps the weapon was a closer semblance to balance back then? When yoj could peek round a corner with out getting 50 ar rounds in your face, you could actually run across 20m of terrain before being butchered?! Im not saying the old ar was perfect, it prehaps could have done with a little more power BACK THEN however now its too powerful, and so is the scrambler (a little less so, but still too much), the sweetmspot exsists somewhere between the 30% dps from .3 and 90% dps of .4, I would say between 75-85% of its current power would be perfect. But then you need to buff the shotgun, sniper up a little!! The MD works perfectly fine.. the same as before 1.4, and the only improvement with the hit detection is the Aim-assist.
1.4 Patch Notes wrote: More hit detection fixes
I know the MD works just the same as .3, because that was fixed in .1, but the ar which most people dealt with wasn't now the ar hit detection is fixed over 300 dps on the mlt or over 400 dps on the proto is too much!! |
Dexter307
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
360
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:16:00 -
[15] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:Banning Hammer wrote:Only few people was using the AR before the Aim-assist, just look back.. you won't see many AR QQing threads. Most of the QQing was about the MD, but curiously ... no one is QQing about the MD anymore ? You have to be blind or stupid to don't see that the AA is the real problem, or both. ive been here since closed beta and the reign of missle dropships. AR QQ threads have exsisted since the begining. AA is turned off right now... so dont even bring that up here. and yes most people used the AR before aim assist aim assist is still on, it hasn't been changed since 1.4 came out. |
Monkey MAC
killer taxi company General Tso's Alliance
563
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:18:00 -
[16] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:this isnt a balance discussion folks...
No its a defend the ar thread, which doesn't need defending it needs balancing!! |
Cosgar
ParagonX
5356
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:19:00 -
[17] - Quote
Banning Hammer wrote:Only few people was using the AR before the Aim-assist, just look back.. you won't see many AR QQing threads. Most of the QQing was about the MD, but curiously ... no one is QQing about the MD anymore ? You have to be blind or stupid to don't see that the AA is the real problem, or both. People always QQ about the MD. As soon as someone makes a topic, it'll go 20+ pages in no time. |
Chances Ghost
D3M3NT3D M1NDZ The Umbra Combine
957
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:36:00 -
[18] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:this isnt a balance discussion folks...
No its a defend the ar thread, which doesn't need defending it needs balancing!!
*facepalm*
do you jsut assume any thread without the word nerf in it is defending something?
if you read it, you may notice that the thread is pointing out a problem with the way skills and balancing efforts make the AR a popular choice. |
True Adamance
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
2118
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:40:00 -
[19] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:the answer is stability and reliability
Beucase of how long it takes to fully skill into a weapon and how oftin weapons go back and fourth in usefullness the AR has been the safe weapon to pick and run since the game began.
almost everyone has skilled into the AR.
investing SP at this point is a gamble, you never know if what your skilling into will still be viable by the time youve invested months to max it out.
and this results in people staying on the safe side of things sticking to the AR in order to have the security of knowing their playstyle will never have to change.
not only that but every player reguardless of race starts with the AR, so they naturally stick to it since its what they first get used to.
its not that the AR is OP its that its the only safe weapon to spec into, the one that wont change and will always be viable.
that combined with its jack of all trades nature is whats creating the AR prevalance we have now.
Stop the AR- VS - Specialist weapons war guys.
its just the natural result of how the game is presented to new players, and the result of the rapid changes the game keeps going under.
I haven't skilled AR at all. |
Monkey MAC
killer taxi company General Tso's Alliance
565
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:40:00 -
[20] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:Monkey MAC wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:this isnt a balance discussion folks...
No its a defend the ar thread, which doesn't need defending it needs balancing!! *facepalm* do you jsut assume any thread without the word nerf in it is defending something? if you read it, you may notice that the thread is pointing out a problem with the way skills and balancing efforts make the AR a popular choice.
Chances Ghost wrote:
its not that the AR is OP-á
That sounds like your defending it to me!! People are annoyed with the power of AR, you tell us its fine, thats defending it in my books!
|
|
Keri Starlight
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
307
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:44:00 -
[21] - Quote
Dexter307 wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Banning Hammer wrote:Only few people was using the AR before the Aim-assist, just look back.. you won't see many AR QQing threads. Most of the QQing was about the MD, but curiously ... no one is QQing about the MD anymore ? You have to be blind or stupid to don't see that the AA is the real problem, or both. ive been here since closed beta and the reign of missle dropships. AR QQ threads have exsisted since the begining. AA is turned off right now... so dont even bring that up here. and yes most people used the AR before aim assist aim assist is still on, it hasn't been changed since 1.4 came out.
Wrong. Aim Assist has been hotfixed and dramatically tuned down. |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1121
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:44:00 -
[22] - Quote
Maybe, just maybe they are the standard issued weapon for infantry/assault types
/thread |
Chances Ghost
D3M3NT3D M1NDZ The Umbra Combine
958
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:45:00 -
[23] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Monkey MAC wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:this isnt a balance discussion folks...
No its a defend the ar thread, which doesn't need defending it needs balancing!! *facepalm* do you jsut assume any thread without the word nerf in it is defending something? if you read it, you may notice that the thread is pointing out a problem with the way skills and balancing efforts make the AR a popular choice. Chances Ghost wrote:
its not that the AR is OP-á
That sounds like your defending it to me!! People are annoyed with the power of AR, you tell us its fine, thats defending it in my books!
*facepalm*
again
the issue isnt weather its OP or not...
the issue is that because of the massive changes back and fourth in weapons the AR is the only option if you want any build stability and want a SAFE invetment for your skillpoints. and a build that will be viable no matter what match/map/ or suit you use.
this thread isnt defending the AR its attacking it from another direction.
if you cant identify a thread that pointsing out PROBLEMS with the AR development and instead cry "stop defending the AR" in a thread thats about FIXING IT then you have no right to comment on the situation.
|
Dexter307
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
360
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:46:00 -
[24] - Quote
Keri Starlight wrote:Dexter307 wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Banning Hammer wrote:Only few people was using the AR before the Aim-assist, just look back.. you won't see many AR QQing threads. Most of the QQing was about the MD, but curiously ... no one is QQing about the MD anymore ? You have to be blind or stupid to don't see that the AA is the real problem, or both. ive been here since closed beta and the reign of missle dropships. AR QQ threads have exsisted since the begining. AA is turned off right now... so dont even bring that up here. and yes most people used the AR before aim assist aim assist is still on, it hasn't been changed since 1.4 came out. Wrong. Aim Assist has been hotfixed and dramatically tuned down. Nope, devs confirmed no changes |
broonfondle majikthies
Bannana Boat Corp
260
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:50:00 -
[25] - Quote
I think its a little pointless agonising about a placeholder weapon. I know CCP wanted to give everyone something familiar but I think they should have just gone with their own style and made it as intended right from the start. They don't have to be like all the other games.
Or else they could have started with the Minmatar combat rifle as that is the one they envisioned as the standard/staple for the game like they said at fanfest |
Monkey MAC
killer taxi company General Tso's Alliance
565
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:52:00 -
[26] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:Monkey MAC wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Monkey MAC wrote: No its a defend the ar thread, which doesn't need defending it needs balancing!!
*facepalm* do you jsut assume any thread without the word nerf in it is defending something? if you read it, you may notice that the thread is pointing out a problem with the way skills and balancing efforts make the AR a popular choice. Chances Ghost wrote:
its not that the AR is OP-á
That sounds like your defending it to me!! People are annoyed with the power of AR, you tell us its fine, thats defending it in my books! *facepalm* again the issue isnt weather its OP or not... the issue is that because of the massive changes back and fourth in weapons the AR is the only option if you want any build stability and want a SAFE invetment for your skillpoints. and a build that will be viable no matter what match/map/ or suit you use. this thread isnt defending the AR its attacking it from another direction. if you cant identify a thread that pointsing out PROBLEMS with the AR development and instead cry "stop defending the AR" in a thread thats about FIXING IT then you have no right to comment on the situation.
Well I also happen to disagree on your points anyway.
MD was a fine and safe investment, which hasn't been changed since .1 ScR is a safe investment, hasn't changed since uprising The AR is going to get changed to the GAR so in reality it was the worst investment, because you skilled into a placeholder weapon, which is GUARANTEED to change in the next couple of months!!
its common among noobs indeed for the reasons you stated, but if you think that same logic applies to vets who have enough sp to proto multiple weapons, you've got another thing coming!!
|
PADDEHATPIGEN
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
63
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 13:31:00 -
[27] - Quote
You ALL act like the AR's NEVER got nerfed, well for all you ignorant, lying basterds, cry babys ect, AR's was nerfed MANY times by now. Go look at all the old DEV post and you will find one nerf after another.
Right now ONLY the full auto AR's are working, the rest of them are USELESS... TRY TO USE AR's before you speak of them.
Go look at the stats on all the weapons, insted of just comming op with falce statements you heard from some noob that dont know anything, but just makes things op as they go...
AR's DOES have kick/recoil, you can't controle it after 25-30 rounds.
AR's DOES have despersion, the tactical AR's are the worst of all weapons in the game.
The breach AR's, do you EVER se anyone use them ? NO they got nerfed SO BAD they are USELESS.
The burst AR's, do you se anyone use them ? HELL NO they are even more USELESS.
The tactial AR's, LOL, there was never a problem with the tactical AR's, there was a problem with players usein modded controllers to abuse the ROF, ALL that was needed to do was lower the ROF, but all you whiners had to get them nerfed even more, more kick, more disp, lower clip size to 18 rounds, etc. They are also almost usel+¬ss now to.
You can also use a modded controller to abuse the CSCR, but that is the weapon ALL the whiners, lying basterds and cry babys use, so no one talks about nerfing SCR's....
Btw. this was NOT a post about nerfs LOL.
I got the AR skills simply for this reason: When i started to play back in beta, there where only 2 assault weapons, 1. the laser, 2. the assailt rifle. I play for Caldari in Eve online so it was clear to me that i wanted to play Caldari in Dust 514 to, as i know about racial bonuses from Eve, i know that Caldari and Gallante use the same weapons, railguns and blasters, and thats the reason i have AR's on my Caldari suit, it fits my race, lasers DONT...
|
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
310
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 14:19:00 -
[28] - Quote
PADDEHATPIGEN wrote:The burst AR's, do you se anyone use them ? HELL NO they are even more USELESS.
Hay, I use the burst AR. Ima Gallente, and when you stack two comp damage mods on the burst it's actually a fairly decent weapon, very accurate, good rate of fire, the cycle reputation (3,3,3) makes it easy to track and place your shots, it has better zoom fidelity and slightly better range, it's a good weapon (I wouldn't use it without atleast two damage mods though). I like the Alottek, that thing really puts out the rounds, but I mostly use the gk-13. Really I use the Tac, burst, and assault, just about evenly (use them situationally) when I am playing a slayer role, but most of the time I am playing as a logi, and mostly with that I just use the exile because it is a blueprint, and the assault is the easiest to use in close quarters, and when you only got one weapon you have to make the most of it. |
Flix Keptick
Red Star. EoN.
75
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 14:29:00 -
[29] - Quote
Banning Hammer wrote:Only few people was using the AR before the Aim-assist, just look back.. you won't see many AR QQing threads. Most of the QQing was about the MD, but curiously ... no one is QQing about the MD anymore ? You have to be blind or stupid to don't see that the AA is the real problem, or both. You dont get to see ar QQ threads because the people that QQ about other weapons are mostly ar users. |
PADDEHATPIGEN
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
63
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 14:30:00 -
[30] - Quote
Exile is a standard weapon, Alloteck is a proto weapon, but we still rather use the Exile. You say you only use Alloteck with minimun 2 complex dmg mods.
I think you made a mistake here, you are saying that im right |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |